THE MOUTH of the HAW the NEWSLETTER of the HAW RIVER TRAIL PARTNERSHIP Fall 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System, 2013
Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System, 2013 By Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver and James F. Merritt August 2014 CMS Report No. 14-02 Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington, N.C. 28409 Executive Summary Multiparameter water sampling for the Lower Cape Fear River Program (LCFRP) has been ongoing since June 1995. Scientists from the University of North Carolina Wilmington’s (UNCW) Aquatic Ecology Laboratory perform the sampling effort. The LCFRP currently encompasses 33 water sampling stations throughout the lower Cape Fear, Black, and Northeast Cape Fear River watersheds. The LCFRP sampling program includes physical, chemical, and biological water quality measurements and analyses of the benthic and epibenthic macroinvertebrate communities, and has in the past included assessment of the fish communities. Principal conclusions of the UNCW researchers conducting these analyses are presented below, with emphasis on water quality of the period January - December 2013. The opinions expressed are those of UNCW scientists and do not necessarily reflect viewpoints of individual contributors to the Lower Cape Fear River Program. The mainstem lower Cape Fear River is a 6th order stream characterized by periodically turbid water containing moderate to high levels of inorganic nutrients. It is fed by two large 5th order blackwater rivers (the Black and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers) that have low levels of turbidity, but highly colored water with less inorganic nutrient content than the mainstem. While nutrients are reasonably high in the river channels, major algal blooms have until recently been rare because light is attenuated by water color or turbidity, and flushing is usually high (Ensign et al. -
Suspended Sediment and Nutrients in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, 2002–04, with an Analysis of Temporal Changes, 1976–2004
Prepared in cooperation with the Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association Suspended Sediment and Nutrients in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, 2002–04, with an Analysis of Temporal Changes, 1976–2004 Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5271 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Deep River spillway upstream from the U.S. highway 1 bridge in Chatham County, North Carolina (photograph by Ryan B. Rasmussen, U.S. Geological Survey). Suspended Sediment and Nutrients in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, 2002–04, with an Analysis of Temporal Changes, 1976–2004 By Timothy B. Spruill, Phillip S. Jen, and Ryan B. Rasmussen Prepared in cooperation with the Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5271 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. -
The Trading Path and North Carolina
Journal of Backcountry Studies The Trading Path and North Carolina BY REBECCA TAFT FECHER Frontier is a subjective term, and one that has shifted and evolved over the years. North Carolina‟s piedmont and mountains originally were „frontier‟. The ever shifting frontier of North Carolina was explored cautiously, and with the help of the natives. In their explorations, and settlement of North Carolina, old native “trading paths” were utilized. Although some has been written about roads and paths into this area, most of the focus has been on the “Great Wagon Road”. A more fascinating look into the settlement of North Carolina‟s frontier is “the braided network of paths” and roads that make up what are referred to as the Great Trading Path.1 The label, in reality, referred to any number of different paths/roads within the state. This network allowed for the settlement of far flung areas in North Carolina, laying the ground work for where towns were formed, and providing a starting point for later roads throughout the state. Trade path routes were originally buffalo paths that then became Indian trails which were taken over by European explorers and settlers. Remnants of these old roads and trails have largely been forgotten as cars speed by, but can still be seen along many roads in this state. In many places, current roads overlay the centuries old paths. “The slender paths of aboriginal intercourse have been broadened and interwoven into the complex mazes of modern commercial lines”.2 Not only do these old roads represent our colonial beginnings, but they are a tangible part of our history that had a direct impact on where and how North Carolina was settled. -
Elkin & Jonesville
ELKIN & JONESVILLE WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION PLAN The Piedmont Triad Regional Council is is working with stakeholders to ensure lon-term ecological health and public use of the the water supply for the Towns of Elkin & Jonesville. While waters in Big Elkin Creek and around the Yadkin River intake are not rated as impaired, both fail to meet their full potential as public and ecological resources, and have opportunities to be restored to greater function as natural and recreational resources. Water Supply Protection Plan Town of Elkin & Town of Jonesville February 2015 Cy Stober, Senior Regional Planner Joy Fields, Planner I Marc Allred, GIS Planner Elizabeth Jernigan, Planner II With Support From Table of Contents ELKIN & JONESVILLE ........................................................................................................... I WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION PLAN .................................................................................... I Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... v Figures & Tables .................................................................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 WATERSHED CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 7 Background ............................................................................................................................................... -
A Case Study of Carolina Bays and Ditched Streams at Risk Under the Proposed WOTUS Definition
CAPE FEAR RIVER WATERSHED: A Case Study of Carolina Bays and Ditched Streams at Risk under the Proposed WOTUS Definition The Cape Fear River. Photo by Kemp Burdette The Cape Fear River Basin is North Carolina’s largest watershed, with an area of over 9,000 square miles. Major tributaries include the Deep River, the Haw River, the Northeast Cape Fear River, the Black River, and the South River. These rivers converge to form a thirty-mile-long estuary before flowing into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear.1 The Cape Fear supplies water to some of the fastest growing counties in the United States;2 roughly one in five North Carolinians gets their drinking water from the Cape Fear, including residents of Greensboro, Fayetteville, and Wilmington.3 The Cape Fear Basin is a popular watershed for a variety of recreation activities. State parks along the river include Haw River State Park, Raven Rock State Park, and Carolina Beach State Park. The faster-flowing water of the upper basin is popular with paddlers, as are the slow meandering blackwater rivers and streams of the lower Cape Fear and estuary. Fishing is very popular; the Cape Fear supports a number of freshwater species, saltwater species, and even anadromous (migratory) species like the endangered sturgeon, striped bass, and shad. Cape Fear River Watershed: Case Study Page 2 of 8 The Cape Fear is North Carolina’s most ecologically diverse watershed; the Lower Cape Fear is notable because it is part of a biodiversity “hotspot,” recording the largest degree of biodiversity on the eastern seaboard of the United States. -
Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System, 2015
Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System, 2015 By Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver and James F. Merritt November 2016 CMS Report No. 16-02 Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington, N.C. 28409 Executive Summary Multiparameter water sampling for the Lower Cape Fear River Program (LCFRP) http://www.uncw.edu/cms/aelab/LCFRP/index.htm, has been ongoing since June 1995. Scientists from the University of North Carolina Wilmington’s (UNCW) Aquatic Ecology Laboratory perform the sampling effort. The LCFRP currently encompasses 33 water sampling stations throughout the lower Cape Fear, Black, and Northeast Cape Fear River watersheds. The LCFRP sampling program includes physical, chemical, and biological water quality measurements and analyses of the benthic and epibenthic macroinvertebrate communities, and has in the past included assessment of the fish communities. Principal conclusions of the UNCW researchers conducting these analyses are presented below, with emphasis on water quality of the period January - December 2015. The opinions expressed are those of UNCW scientists and do not necessarily reflect viewpoints of individual contributors to the Lower Cape Fear River Program. The mainstem lower Cape Fear River is a 6th order stream characterized by periodically turbid water containing moderate to high levels of inorganic nutrients. It is fed by two large 5th order blackwater rivers (the Black and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers) that have low levels of turbidity, but highly colored water with less inorganic nutrient content than the mainstem. While nutrients are reasonably high in the river channels, major algal blooms have until recently been rare because light is attenuated by water color or turbidity, and flushing is usually high (Ensign et al. -
Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: the North Carolina Experience
Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: The North Carolina Experience Zack Moore, MD, MPH State Epidemiologist Division of Public Health, N.C. DHHS Outline • Timeline of GenX response and scope of issue • Public health responses • Challenges and data gaps • Ongoing and future activities Wilmington, North Carolina Timeline of Response to GenX in Drinking Water • June 2017 −News coverage brings GenX to the forefront −N.C. DHHS contacted by local health departments 4 What is GenX? • Replacement chemical for PFOA • Perfluoroalkyl Ether Carboxylic Acid (PFECA) • Manufactured since 2009 • Byproduct of other manufacturing processes since ~1980 Scope of Problem – Surface water sourced public water • Hundreds of thousands public water customers affected by GenX and other PFAS in Cape Fear River Sun et al 2016 Timeline of Response to GenX in Drinking Water • June 2017 • August 2017 −News coverage brings GenX to −GenX detected in monitoring the forefront wells on-site −N.C. DHHS contacted by local • September 2017 health departments −Private well sampling near the −N.C. DHHS issues initial drinking facility begins water assessment −Chemours stops discharge of GenX to Cape Fear River • July 2017 −N.C. DHHS updates assessment and issues a provisional health goal of 140 ng/L (ppt) Scope of Problem – Groundwater sourced private wells • Hundreds of parcels with private wells near the facility potentially impacted by GenX and other PFAS • Phase 1 & 2 GenX results −Blue: ND −Green: 11-100 ng/L −Yellow: 101-140 ng/L −Orange: 141-420 ng/L −Red: >420 ng/L N.C. DEQ Scope of Problem – Groundwater sourced private wells • Sampling will continue until full extent of contamination is determined −Dark blue: phase 1 −Orange: phase 2 −Light blue/yellow: phase 3 −Fuchsia: phase 4 N.C. -
Genx, Environmental Justice, and North Carolina's Legacy of Pollution
GenX, Environmental Justice, and North Carolina’s Legacy of Pollution Christine Billings Nicholas Krebs Jatu F. Nugrohorukmi Cameron Smith Mackenzie Todd December 8, 2017 Department of Public and International Affairs Leutze Hall, University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington, NC 28403 GenX, Environmental Justice, and North Carolina’s Legacy of Pollution Final Project Fall Semester 2017 Prepared For Dr. Weinkle’s MCOP 595 Prepared By University of North Carolina at Wilmington Coastal and Ocean Policy Program The cover page pictures were provided by the EPA and StarNews Online. Maps throughout this paper were created using ArcGIS software by Esri. ArcGIS and ArcMap are the intellectual property of Esri and are used herein under license. Copyright © Esri. All Rights Reserved. For more information about Esri software, please visit www.esri.com. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Dr. Rob Hart of UNC Wilmington Department of History, Dr. Larry Cahoon of UNC Wilmington Department of Marine Biology, and Kemp Burdette of Cape Fear River Watch. i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ i Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review ......................................................................................................................... 4 Methods ......................................................................................................................................... -
Coastal Resilience Assessment of the Cape Fear Watershed
PILOT: Coastal Resilience Assessment of the Cape Fear Watershed i IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER: This report represents a Regional Coastal Resilience Assessment that can be used to identify places on the landscape for resilience-building efforts and conservation actions through understanding coastal flood threats, the exposure of populations and infrastructure have to those threats, and the presence of suitable fish and wildlife habitat. As with all remotely sensed or publicly available data, all features should be verified with a site visit, as the locations of suitable landscapes or areas containing flood hazards and community assets are approximate. The data, maps, and analysis provided should be used only as a screening-level resource to support management decisions. This report should be used strictly as a planning reference tool and not for permitting or other legal purposes. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government, or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s partners. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation or its funding sources. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION DISCLAIMER: The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NOAA or the Department of Commerce. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS DISCLAIMER: NFWF’s assessment methodology focuses on identifying and ranking Resilience Hubs, or undeveloped areas of open space. -
INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES • $52 Million • Classroom Resources Including Textbooks, Instructional Supplies and Equipment
Investing in Infrastructure •Targeted, long-term investments •Historically low interest rates •Will not jeopardize our credit ratings •No new INSTRUCTIONALtaxes RESOURCES • $52 million • Classroom resources including textbooks, •Broad, bipartisaninstructional supplies public and support equipment 2 15 Years Since Last Bond Referendum INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES • $52 million • Classroom resources including textbooks, instructional supplies and equipment Note: Population data from OSBM and voter approved debt from the Department of State Treasurer. 3 Now is the Time INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES • $52 million • Classroom resources including textbooks, instructional supplies and equipment 4 Ample Debt Service Capacity INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES • $52 million • Classroom resources including textbooks, instructional supplies and equipment Note: General Fund revenue data reflect budgeted amounts (HB 97) for FYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 and OSBM estimates for FY 2017-18 to FY 2025-26. Debt-service payments based on NC Fiscal Research Division estimates. 5 INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES • $52 million • Classroom resources including textbooks, instructional supplies and equipment Note: Based on data from the 2015 DAAC Study by the NC Department of State Treasurer and HB 943 estimates from the NC Fiscal Research Division. Debt amounts include General Obligation debt and Special Indebtedness, but do not include capital leases and debt issued by NC Turnpike Authority. Projections assume four debt issuances over the next four fiscal years. 6 Focus on Education INSTRUCTIONAL -
Alamance County Recreation & Parks July 2020
Haw River Trail - Great Bend Park Alamance County Recreation & Parks July 2020 04 Alamance Parks 05 Cedarock Park 10 Community Centers 14 Haw River Trail 18 Cane Creek Mountains Natural Area 19 Athletics 21 Special Populations 24 Public Relations & Communications 26 Alamance County Visitors Bureau 31 Textile Heritage Museum 33 Staff & Facilty Information 38 Funds 39 Recreation & Parks Commission 40 Appendix A: Visitation PAGE 04 ALAMANCE PARKS 2019-20 ANNUAL REPORT Alamance For more than 40 years, Alamance Parks has worked to improve the Parks quality of life of Alamance County residents. Through our parks and programs, we encourage healthy lifestyles for children and adults, offer inclusive activities for all of our citizens, and provide access to the natural world. The department, founded in the early 1970s, offers a variety of outdoor activities and program options to the Alamance community. Alamance Parks offers access to the outdoors through Cedarock Park, Cane Creek Mountains Natural Area, Great Bend Park, Shallow Ford Natural Area, Saxapahaw Island Park, and trails associated with the Haw River Trail. Cedarock Park offers a Historical Farm restored to the 1800s time period, more than six miles each of hiking and equestrian trails, two disc golf courses, a footgolf course, a fishing pond, picnic shelters, a playground, and open play spaces. Special events and programs take place at the parks throughout the year. Alamance Parks offers year -round youth athletics programs including Little League, softball, baseball, Tee - ball, basketball, and football. The department has a Special Olympics chapter that provides a variety of activities for children and adults with intellectual and physical disabilities in Alamance County, as well as a Visually Impaired Program offering monthly activities for the visually impaired. -
Nc State Parks
GUIDE TO NC STATE PARKS North Carolina’s first state park, Mount Mitchell, offers the same spectacular views today as it did in 1916. 42 OUR STATE GUIDE to the GREAT OUTDOORS North Carolina’s state parks are packed with opportunities: for adventure and leisure, recreation and education. From our highest peaks to our most pristine shorelines, there’s a park for everyone, right here at home. ACTIVITIES & AMENITIES CAMPING CABINS MILES 5 THAN MORE HIKING, RIDING HORSEBACK BICYCLING CLIMBING ROCK FISHING SWIMMING SHELTER PICNIC CENTER VISITOR SITE HISTORIC CAROLINA BEACH DISMAL SWAMP STATE PARK CHIMNEY ROCK STATE PARK SOUTH MILLS // Once a site of • • • CAROLINA BEACH // This coastal park is extensive logging, this now-protected CROWDERSMOUNTAIN • • • • • • home to the Venus flytrap, a carnivorous land has rebounded. Sixteen miles ELK KNOB plant unique to the wetlands of the of trails lead visitors around this • • Carolinas. Located along the Cape hauntingly beautiful landscape, and a GORGES • • • • • • Fear River, this secluded area is no less 2,000-foot boardwalk ventures into GRANDFATHERMOUNTAIN • • dynamic than the nearby Atlantic. the Great Dismal Swamp itself. HANGING ROCK (910) 458-8206 (252) 771-6593 • • • • • • • • • • • ncparks.gov/carolina-beach-state-park ncparks.gov/dismal-swamp-state-park LAKE JAMES • • • • • LAKE NORMAN • • • • • • • CARVERS CREEK STATE PARK ELK KNOB STATE PARK MORROW MOUNTAIN • • • • • • • • • WESTERN SPRING LAKE // A historic Rockefeller TODD // Elk Knob is the only park MOUNT JEFFERSON • family vacation home is set among the in the state that offers cross- MOUNT MITCHELL longleaf pines of this park, whose scenic country skiing during the winter. • • • • landscape spans more than 4,000 acres, Dramatic elevation changes create NEW RIVER • • • • • rich with natural and historical beauty.