River Meon – Titchfield

River Meon – Titchfield An Advisory Visit by the Wild Trout Trust, June 2017 1 1. Introduction This report is the output of a site visit to a short 50m section of the River Meon near Titchfield in Hampshire. The river here, which borders residential property at Place House Cottages, is owned by Mr and Mrs Wilton-Smith and Mr and Mrs Groves. The request for the advisory visit came from Elaina Whittaker-Slark who is Lead Ranger for the South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA). The reason for the site visit was to inspect a section of river where the owners have concerns about bank erosion and to explore options for effective and sustainable bank defences. This section of the River Meon has recently been the subject of a collaborative water vole reintroduction programme. So far, this project has been very successful, with water vole now well established in the lower Meon following the re-introduction and a concerted campaign to eradicate non-native mink from the catchment. The land owners have concerns that water vole burrows might be responsible for weakening the river bank adjacent to their property. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with the land owners and Ms Whittaker-Slark and staff from the SDNPA. Throughout the report, normal convention is followed with respect to bank identification, i.e. banks are designated Left Bank (LB) or Right Bank (RB) whilst looking downstream. Map 1. River Meon, Tichfield © streetmap 2 River Meon River River Meon Waterbody Name River Meon Waterbody ID GB 107042016640 Management Catchment East Hampshire rivers River Basin District South East Current Ecological Quality Moderate Status – Good by 2027 U/S Grid Ref inspected SU5430306567 D/S Grid Ref inspected SU5430006520 Length of river inspected 0.05km Table 1. Overview of the waterbody. Information sourced from http://environment.data.gov.uk/catchment-planning/WaterBody/GB107042016640 2. Catchment overview The River Meon rises from the Hampshire chalk aquifer near the village of East Meon and flows south for approximately 37km before entering the sea at Hill Head. The river enjoys a steep gradient for a chalk river, falling approximately 120m from source to sea. The middle and upper reaches of the river flow over deposits of Lower Chalk, which is less permeable than the Upper Chalk geology predominantly found in the rest of East Hampshire. As a result, the Meon tends to have a greater flow range compared to other southern chalk streams. Near Exton and Warnford, the river flows over a predominantly chalk geology, but further downstream (near Soberton) glacial deposits of London Clay and Reading Sand become more prominent. These deposits dominate the Meon catchment south of Soberton Heath until the river enters the sea at Titchfield Haven. For much of its length, the river displays the classic chalk stream characteristics of clear water, low soft margins and an abundance of in-channel macrophytes dominated by water crowfoot (Ranunculus spp.), starwort (Callitriche spp.) and water moss (Fontinalis antipyretica). As with most chalk rivers, the channel is 3 heavily modified and in-channel habitats are influenced by the numerous structures and milling impoundments found throughout its length. Fishery surveys of the Meon conducted by the Environment Agency (EA) have concluded that the river is “a productive brown trout river”. The Meon is also noted for a strong run of migratory sea trout although they are rarely targeted by anglers. Sea trout are known to run upstream of Droxford during wet years and the EA have plans to improve access for migratory fish by improving existing fish passes on the lower river. In recent years, a small salmon population has become established in the lower reaches of the Meon, probably as a result of changes to water level control structures located near Titchfield which has seen more flow allowed to flow via the natural channel, as opposed to the high level mill channel, which is the location of this particular site visit. The river also supports a range of coarse fish, eel and strong populations of brook lamprey and bullhead which, along with salmon, are designated as species of conservation importance under the EU Habitats Directive. The Meon (Waterbody ID GB107042016640) has been assessed as being in ‘Moderate Condition’ under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the river is known to be both over-abstracted and over-licensed for abstraction under the EA’s own Catchment Abstraction Management Plan. 3. Channel and bank assessment The river channel adjacent to Place House Cottages forms part of the old mill leat which was constructed to feed high level flows to Titchfield Mill, located approximately 0.5km downstream. The leat is very much a man-made feature, albeit an old one. The mill leat has a shallow bed gradient and the water is impounded by the weir structure downstream. The slow-moving water in the leat means that sediment which had been carried by faster-moving water upstream is deposited in the mill channel, particularly towards the lower sections. Deposited fine sediment is only moved on in exceptionally high flow years, when the gates at Titchfield Mill will be fully drawn (opened) for long periods of time to prevent flooding. Under normal flow conditions, water velocities will invariably be slower in the mill leat compared to the parallel river channel, resulting in a mainly depositional, rather than an eroding flow regime. In the mill leat, water is contained in a perched (raised) channel to the west of the valley floor. Any bank erosion pressures to the left bank could potentially lead to a serious bank breach, which would require early intervention because flow would naturally spill through any gap in an effort to reach the valley floor, potentially leading to a serious failure. Any erosion of the right bank is highly unlikely to lead to serious bank damage because there is no scope for the water to cut in and flow down-hill. In depositional channels, it is very rare to have bank erosion issues, other than those caused by anthropogenic, rather than river-related activities. These generally include inappropriate land use, poor bank management and maintenance, non-native plant communities, heavy footfall, dog slides or heavy grazing pressures coupled with livestock trampling. Some burrowing animals are 4 known to exacerbate bank erosion but this is invariably associated with non- native species, such as signal crayfish and mitten crab, which in some systems can turn a vertical river bank into veritable Swiss cheese, sometimes resulting in block slumping and partial collapse. Voles are most likely genetically predisposed to burrowing into comparatively stable bank areas. Natural selection pressures suggest that if voles decided to burrow where flow velocities are potentially erosive then they are far less likely to be as successful in breeding compared to those animals that elect to bring up their young in stable environments. This may be one of the reasons why benign mill leats, with stable banks and managed water levels make attractive locations for voles to colonise. As a native species, with a host of native predators, it is highly unlikely that vole populations can build to such an extent as to cause serious bank failure and where bank failure on a man–made channel has occurred, it is invariably due to a combination of factors. Following the inspection of the banks at both properties, it would appear that the banks adjacent to the upstream property (photo 1) are potentially more at risk from a block bank failure than the banks adjacent to the downstream property. This is simply because the bank here is on the outside tail of a sweeping bend. Potentially, any high flow velocities will sweep down the outside of the bend adjacent to the well defended (tree lined) bank next to the Fisherman’s Rest car park before barreling into the vertical bank upstream of the large willow tree (marked A). Photo 1 Bank adjacent to the upstream property The large willow tree will undoubtedly have a network of strong roots that will help to bind the bank together. This extensive root system is providing bank 5 protection in the vulnerable area marked A. It will be important to keep this tree healthy to maintain optimum bank protection. Crack and white willow have a tendency to split and fall, rather than upending with root plate attached. Pollarding tall trees to take the weight of the top of the tree will often increase the lifespan of large willow trees, however expert arboriculture advice is required before contemplating any work. Without an extensive root system, the bank marked A would be extremely vulnerable due to its vertical configuration and undefended top soils (managed lawn). Ordinary lawn grass is very shallow rooted and does not provide any significant support for the top or face of the bank and therefore leaves the bank vulnerable to erosion. The vertical “cliff” face is also a hostile environment for any plants to grow and therefore there is no complex root matrix available to help bind the soils. Battering back the bank to a sloping angle would enable some planting to become established but would involve a loss of garden and leave the willow vulnerable. The best option here is to establish a new toe to the existing bank and plant up with energy-absorbing aquatic emergent plants. This is discussed further in the recommendations section. The bag work bank protection highlighted at B in photo1 and also shown in photo 2 has obviously been installed to provide critically important protection for the ancient wall behind. This will undoubtedly protect the wall immediately behind the bag work from any bank failure but it will lead to increased erosion pressures on the downstream end of the bag work, where flow will eddy off the hard promontory created by the bag work and nibble away at any soft, vertical surfaces downstream.

Load more