DOCSLIB.ORG

December, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
December, 2015 CONTENTS Appointments and Retirements in the Supreme Court of India .........................2 Vacancies in the Courts ................................................................................ 3 - 6 Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases in the Supreme Court.................7 Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases in the High Courts .................. 8-9 Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases in the District and Subordinate Courts............................................................................ 10 - 12 Some Supreme Court Judgments / Orders of Public Importance .......... 13 - 17 Major activities of National Judicial Academy ........................................... 18 - 20 Major activities of National Legal Services Authority ....................................... 21 Some Important Visits and Meetings .................................................................... 22 - 24 This newsletter is intended to provide public access to information on the activities and achievements of the Indian Judiciary in general. While every care has . been taken to ensure accuracy and to avoid errors/omissions, information given in the newsletter is merely for reference and must not be taken as having the authority of, or being binding in any way on, the Editorial Board of the newsletter and the officials involved in compilation thereof, who do not owe any responsibility whatsoever for any loss, damage, or distress to any person, whether or not a user of this publication, on account of any action taken or not taken on the basis of the information given in this newsletter. 2 COURT NEWS, OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2015 APPOINTMENTS AND RETIREMENTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM 01-10-2015 TO 31-12-2015) APPOINTMENT OF NEW CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. Thakur was appointed as the Chief Justice of India on 3-12-2015 RETIREMENTS S. No. Name of the Hon’ble Judge Date of Retirement 1 Hon'ble Shri H.L. Dattu, CJI 03-12-2015 2 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikramajit Sen 31-12-2015 COURT NEWS, OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2015 3 VACANCIES IN THE COURTS A) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (As on 01-01-2016) Sanctioned Strength Working strength Vacancies 31 26 05 B1) HIGH COURTS (As on 30-09-2015) S.No. Name of the High Court Sanctioned Strength Working Strength Vacancies 1 Allahabad 160 75 85 2 Andhra Pradesh & 49 27 22 Telangana 3 Bombay 94 61 33 4 Calcutta 58 42 16 5 Chhatisgarh 22 9 13 6 Delhi 60 39 21 7 Gujarat 52 28 24 8 Gauhati 24 17 7 9 Himachal Pradesh 13 7 6 10 Jammu & Kashmir 17 10 7 11 Jharkhand 25 14 11 12 Karnataka 62 31 31 13 Kerala 38 36 2 14 Madhya Pradesh 53 30 23 15 Madras 60 37 23 16 Manipur 5 3 2 17 Meghalaya 3 3 0 18 Orissa 27 22 5 19 Patna 43 30 13 20 Punjab & Haryana 85 52 33 21 Rajasthan 50 25 25 22 Sikkim 3 3 0 23 Tripura 4 4 0 24 Uttarakhand 9 6 3 Total 1016 611 405 . Above statement is compiled on the basis of figures received from the High Courts 4 COURT NEWS, OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2015 B2) HIGH COURTS (As on 31-12-2015) S.No. Name of the High Court Sanctioned Strength Working Strength Vacancies 1 Allahabad 160 74 86 2 Andhra Pradesh & 49 27 22 Telangana 3 Bombay 94 59 35 4 Calcutta 58 39 19 5 Chhatisgarh 22 9 13 6 Delhi 60 39 21 7 Gujarat 52 28 24 8 Gauhati 24 17 7 9 Himachal Pradesh 13 7 6 10 Jammu & Kashmir 17 9 8 11 Jharkhand 25 14 11 12 Karnataka 62 31 31 13 Kerala 38 35 3 14 Madhya Pradesh 53 30 23 15 Madras 60 37 23 16 Manipur 5 3 2 17 Meghalaya 3 3 0 18 Orissa 27 22 5 19 Patna 43 28 15 20 Punjab & Haryana 85 50 35 21 Rajasthan 50 25 25 22 Sikkim 3 2 1 23 Tripura 4 4 0 24 Uttarakhand 11 6 5 Total 1018 598 420 . Above statement is compiled on the basis of figures received from the High Courts COURT NEWS, OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2015 5 C1) DISTRICT & SUBORDINATE COURTS (As on 30-09-2015) S.No. State/Union Territory Sanctioned Strength Working Strength Vacancies 1 Uttar Pradesh 2099 1845 254 2 Andhra Pradesh & 1034 795 239 Telangana 3(a) Maharashtra 2251 1709 542 3(b) Goa 57 49 8 3(c) Diu and Daman & Silvasa 7 6 1 4 West Bengal and 994 904 90 Andaman & Nicobar 5 Chhatisgarh 384 319 65 6 Delhi 778 475 303 7 Gujarat 1914 1181 733 8(a) Assam 424 306 118 8(b) Nagaland 27 25 2 8(c) Mizoram 67 31 36 8(d) Arunachal Pradesh 16 15 1 9 Himachal Pradesh 152 138 14 10 Jammu & Kashmir 246 221 25 11 Jharkhand 590 471 119 12 Karnataka 1122 820 302 13(a) Kerala 457 422 35 13(b) Lakshadweep 3 3 0 14 Madhya Pradesh 1461 1218 243 15 Manipur 41 31 10 16 Meghalya 39 30 9 17(a) Tamil Nadu 1011 967 44 17(b) Puducherry 21 14 7 18 Orissa 713 614 99 19 Bihar 1727 1070 657 20(a) Punjab 672 495 177 20(b) Haryana 644 476 168 20(c) Chandigarh 30 30 0 21 Rajasthan 1191 986 205 22 Sikkim 18 14 4 23 Tripura 104 70 34 24 Uttarakhand 280 207 73 Total 20574 15957 4617 . Above statement is compiled on the basis of figures received from the High Courts INSTITUTION, DISPOSAL AND 6 COURT NEWS, OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2015 C2) DISTRICT & SUBORDINATE COURTS (As on 31-12-2015) S.No. State/Union Territory Sanctioned Strength Working Strength Vacancies 1 Uttar Pradesh 2100 1825 275 2 Andhra Pradesh & 1034 786 248 Telangana 3(a) Maharashtra 2251 1917 334 3(b) Goa 57 48 9 3(c) Diu and Daman & Silvasa 7 6 1 4 West Bengal and 994 868 126 Andaman & Nicobar 5 Chhatisgarh 394 341 53 6 Delhi 778 490 288 7 Gujarat 1939 1170 769 8(a) Assam 424 319 105 8(b) Nagaland 27 25 2 8(c) Mizoram 63 30 33 8(d) Arunachal Pradesh 17 15 2 9 Himachal Pradesh 152 134 19 10 Jammu & Kashmir 245 220 25 11 Jharkhand 592 466 126 12 Karnataka 1122 820 302 13(a) Kerala 457 442 15 13(b) Lakshadweep 3 3 0 14 Madhya Pradesh 1461 1215 246 15 Manipur 41 34 7 16 Meghalya 39 30 9 17(a) Tamil Nadu 1015 969 46 17(b) Puducherry 26 14 12 18 Orissa 716 598 118 19 Bihar 1727 1067 660 20(a) Punjab 672 490 182 20(b) Haryana 644 474 170 20(c) Chandigarh 30 30 0 21 Rajasthan 1191 985 206 22 Sikkim 18 14 4 23 Tripura 104 68 36 24 Uttarakhand 280 206 74 Total 20620 16119 4501 . Above statement is compiled on the basis of figures received from the High Courts INSTITUTION, DISPOSAL AND COURT NEWS, OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2015 7 INSTITUTION, DISPOSAL AND PENDENCY OF CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT [01-10-2015 to 31-12-2015] i) Table I Pendency (At the end of 30-09-2015) Admission Regular Total matters matters matters 33,506 26,404 59,910 Institution (including Disposal (including Pendency unregistered CC matters and unregistered CC matters and (At the end of 31-12-2015) conversion) (01-10-2015 to conversion) (01-10-2015 to 31-12-2015) 31-12-2015) Admission Regular Total Admission Regular Total Admission Regular Total matters matters matters matters matters matters matters matters matters 16,821 2,470 19,291 17,064 2,865 19,929 33,263 26,009 59,272 ii) Table II OPENING INSTITUTION DISPOSAL PENDENCY BALANCE AS FROM 01-10-15 FROM 01-10-15 AT THE END ON 01-10-15 TO 31-12-15 TO 31-12-15 OF 31-12-15 Civil cases 48,717 14,447 14,983 48,181 Criminal cases 11,193 4,844 4,946 11,091 ALL CASES (Total) 59,910 19,291 19,929 59,272 NOTE: 1. Out of the 59,272 pending matters as on 31-12-2015, if connected matters are excluded, the pendency is only of 34,502 matters as on 31-12-2015. 2. Out of the 59,272 pending matters as on 31-12-2015, 16,558 matters are upto one year old and thus arrears (i.e. cases pending more than a year) are only of 42,714 matters as on 31-12-2015. 3. Total institution shown above of 19,291 includes conversion of 2,457 matters from one case type to other and also registration of 6,999 unregistered CC matters. 4. Total Disposal shown above of 19,929 includes conversion of 1,125 matters from one case type to other and also registration of 5,859 unregistered CC matters. 8 COURT NEWS, OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2015 INSTITUTION, DISPOSAL AND PENDENCY OF CASES IN THE HIGH COURTS 1) HIGH COURTS (FROM 01-07-15 TO 30-09-15) Cases brought forward Freshly instituted Cases Disposed of Cases during Pending cases at the % of % of % from the previous Quarter during this Quarter this Quarter end of this Quarter Institution Disposal Increase or (Nos.) (Civil/Crl.) (Nos.) (Civil/Crl.) (Nos.) (Civil/Criminal) (Nos.)(Civil/Criminal) of Cases of Cases Decrease in (As on 1-7-2015) (As on 30-9-2015) w.r.t w.r.t Pendency S. Name of the CIVIL CRL. CIV.+ CIVIL CRL. CIV.+ CIVIL CRL. CIV.+ CIVIL CRL. CIV.+ Opening Opening w.r.t. No. High Court CRL. CRL. CRL. CRL Balance Balance Opening as on as on Balance as 1-07-15 1-07-15 on 1-07 -15 1 Allahabad* 555422 359511 914933 41820 45723 87543 38658 47320 85978 558584 357914 916498 9.57 9.40 0.17 2 Andhra Pradesh & 226159 35989 262148 18315 5416 23731 15050 4148 19198 229424 37257 266681 9.05 7.32 1.73 Telangana 3 Bombay 187615 44648 232263 19399 6918 26317 18165 6278 24443 188849 45288 234137 11.33 10.52 0.81 4 Calcutta 180124 39078 219202 17594 4753 22347 18673 4232 22905 179045 39599 218644 10.19 10.45 -0.25 5 Chhatisgarh 28822 17292 46114 4267 3738 8005 3932 3534 7466 29157 17496 46653 17.36 16.19 1.17 6 Delhi 54204 15423 69627 8895 3974 12869 7061 4035 11096 56038 15362 71400 18.48 15.94 2.55 7 Gujarat 55307 33905 89212 11293 8174 19467 15817 8856 24673 50783 33223 84006 21.82 27.66 -5.84 8 Gauhati 36157 7101 43258 5079 1953 7032 4207 2258 6465 37029 6796 43825 16.26 14.95 1.31 9 Himachal Pradesh 28559 5149 33708 5143 1189 6332 5987 1072 7059 27715 5266 32981 18.78 20.94 -2.16 10 Jammu & Kashmir* 52480 3890 56370 2890 479 3369 3623 284 3907 51747 4085 55832 5.98 6.93 -0.95 11 Jharkhand 42781 37438 80219 2516 6785 9301 3183 6396 9579 42114 37827 79941 11.59 11.94 -0.35 12 Karnataka 208087 18104 226191 33549 4776 38325 32479 4208 36687 209157 18672 227829 16.94 16.22 0.72 13 Kerala 118841
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dat~D: ~: -~--L~I~(I' ~- CIRCULAR
    HIGH COURT OJ1' DELHI: NEW DELHI No.3G IG-4/GcnllDHC Dat~d: ~: -~--L~I~(I' ~- CIRCULAR It is circulated for information of all the concerned that for speedy and direct delivery of inward mails, Department of Post, Ministry of Communications and IT, Government of India, has allotted new customer specific Pin Code No. 11020 1 exclusively 10 Supreme Court of India. Further, the Pin Code allotted to the Delhi High Court is 110503 for speedy delivery of inward mails. It is, therefore, requested that the aforesaid Pincodes may be used in all future corrcspontlence to Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court. ~/- (S. P. SINGH) JOINT REGISTRAR (GENL) Endst No. '(~~3 ~_/G-4/Genl/DHC Dated. (8)6j ) '- ~ _ Copy forwarded for information and necessary action to:­ l. The Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, R. No. 113, Gate No.4, North Block, New Delhi. 2. The Secretary, M,inistry of Law, Justice & Co. Affairs, Govt. ofIndia, Jaisalmer Housc, New Delhi. ,., ..1. The Principal Secretary (Law, Justice & LA), Delhi Secretariat, IP Estate, New Delhi. 4. The Secretary General, Supreme COllli ofIndia, Tilak Marg, New Delhi. 5. The Registrars General, All High Courts of India. 6. The District & Sessions Judge (Headqualicrs), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. 7. The District & Sessions Judge (East), Karkardooma COLllis, Delhi. 8. The District & Sessions Judge (New Delhi), Patiala House COLllis, New Delhi. 9. The District & Sessions Judge (South West), Dwarka Co Lllis, New Delhi. 10. The District & Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari COLllis, Delhi. ll. The District & Sessions Judge (NOlib West), Tis Hazari COlllis, Delhi.
    [Show full text]
  • Oram, Shri Jual
    For official use only LOK SABHA DEBATES ON THE CONSTITUTION (ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIRST AMENDMENT) BILL, 2014 (Insertion of new articles 124A, 124B and 124C) AND THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION BILL, 2014 (Seal) LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI EDITORIAL BOARD P.K. Grover Secretary General Lok Sabha R.K. Jain Joint Secretary Vandna Trivedi Director Parmjeet Karolia Additional Director J.B.S. Rawat Joint Director Pratibha Kashyap Assistant Editor © 2014 Lok Sabha Secretariat None of the material may be copied, reproduced, distributed, republished, downloaded, displayed, posted or transmitted in any form or by any means, including but not limited to, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Lok Sabha Secretariat. However, the material can be displayed, copied, distributed and downloaded for personal, non-commercial use only, provided the material is not modified and all copyright and other proprietary notices contained in the material are retained. CONTENTS Tuesday/Wednesday, August 12/13, 2014/Shravana 21/22, 1936 (Saka) Pages THE CONSTITUTION (ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY- 1-105 FIRST AMENDMENT) BILL, 2014 (Insertion of new articles 124A, 124B and 124C) AND THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION BILL, 2014 Motion to consider 1-2 Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad 2-13, 77-99 Shri M. Veerappa Moily 16-26 Shri S.S. Ahluwalia 26-31 Dr. M. Thambidurai 31-38 Shri Kalyan Banerjee 39-46 Shri Bhartruhari Mahtab 46-52 Shri Anandrao Adsul 52-53 Shri B. Vinod Kumar 53-55 Dr. A. Sampath 55-59 Shri Ram Vilas Paswan 60-63 Shri Dharmendra Yadav 63-64 Shri Rajesh Ranjan 65-66 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 216Th Report on Non-Feasibility Of
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA NON-FEASIBILITY OF INTRODUCTION OF HINDI AS COMPULSORY LANGUAGE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Report No. 216 December 2008 1 LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA (REPORT NO. 216) NON-FEASIBILITY OF INTRODUCTION OF HINDI AS COMPULSORY LANGUAGE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Presented to Dr. H.R.Bhardwaj, Union Minister for Law & Justice, Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, by Dr. Justice AR. Lakshmanan, Chairman, Law Commission of India, on the 17th day of December, 2008. The 18th Law Commission was constituted for a period of three years from 1st September, 2006 by Order No. A.45012/1/2006-Admn.III (LA) dated the 16th October, 2006, 2 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi. The Law Commission consists of the Chairman, the Member-Secretary, one full-time Member and seven part- time Members. Chairman Hon’ble Dr Justice AR. Lakshmanan Member-Secretary Dr Brahm A. Agrawal Full-time Member Prof. Dr Tahir Mahmood Part-time Members Dr (Mrs) Devinder Kumari Raheja Dr K. N. Chandrasekharan Pillai Prof. (Mrs) Lakshmi Jambholkar Smt. Kirti Singh Shri Justice I. Venkatanarayana Shri O.P. Sharma Dr (Mrs) Shyamlha Pappu The Law Commission is located in ILI Building, 2nd Floor, Bhagwan Das Road, 3 New Delhi-110 001 Law Commission Staff Member-Secretary Dr Brahm A. Agrawal Research Staff Shri Sushil Kumar : Joint Secretary & Law Officer Ms. Pawan Sharma : Additional Law Officer Shri J. T. Sulaxan Rao : Additional Law Officer Shri A. K. Upadhyay : Deputy Law Officer Dr V.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituent Assembly Debates (Proceedings)- Volume Viii
    CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY DEBATES (PROCEEDINGS)- VOLUME VIII Tuesday, the 24th May, 1949 ---------- The Constituent Assembly of India met in the Constitution Hall, New Delhi, at Ten minutes past Eight of the Clock, Mr. President (The Honourable Dr. Rajendra Prasad) in the Chair. ---------- The Honourable Shri Ghanshyam Singh Gupta (C.P. & Berar : General): Sir, could we not do something to be punctual? It pains me very much to see that we commence our business eleven minutes late. This is very bad for us and it ought to be a matter worthy of your consideration that we should be punctual. Mr. Tajamul Husain (Bihar: Muslim): For that we are to blame. The fault is ours. We do not come here in time. The Honourable Shri Ghanshyam Singh Gupta: What I once did in the C.P. Assembly was that I entered punctually and when I found that there was no quorum, I told honourable Members that I would retire for five minutes to see whether there was quorum. This was the solitary instance and I have found that I have not to wait even for five seconds. It is a matter of very great concern that this august House should commence its work eleven minutes after time. Mr. President: I am glad that the honourable Member has drawn attention to this. I myself have been waiting for the past twenty minutes in the chamber. I hope the point that he has raised will receive due consideration at the hands of honourable Members and it will not be necessary for me to take the step which he took in the C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • ADJUDICATING the HUMAN RIGHT to ADEQUATE HOUSING Analysis of Important Judgments from Indian High Courts
    ADJUDICATING THE HUMAN RIGHT TO ADEQUATE HOUSING Analysis of Important Judgments from Indian High Courts HOUSING AND LAND RIGHTS NETWORK Adjudicating the Human Right to Adequate Housing Analysis of Important Judgments from Indian High Courts 01 Suggested Citation: Adjudicating the Human Right to Adequate Housing: Analysis of Important Judgments from Indian High Courts, Housing and Land Rights Network, New Delhi, 2019 Conceptual Framework, Analysis, and Editing: Shivani Chaudhry and Miloon Kothari Legal Research and Analysis: Aishwarya Ayushmaan [with inputs from Ikshaku Bezbaroa for the initial draft] Published by: Housing and Land Rights Network G-18/1 Nizamuddin West Lower Ground Floor New Delhi – 110 013, INDIA +91-11-4054-1680 [email protected] www.hlrn.org.in New Delhi, April 2019 ISBN: 978-81-935672-2-7 This publication is printed on CyclusPrint based on 100% recycled fibres ADJUDICATING THE HUMAN RIGHT TO ADEQUATE HOUSING Analysis of Important Judgments from Indian High Courts HOUSING AND LAND RIGHTS NETWORK ii Housing and Land Rights Network PREFACE “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” ~ Theodore Parker While justice should be an inherent component of the law and, incontestably, is its end, in many parts of the world, law and justice, unfortunately, are not synonymous. Even where just laws exist, they are often not implemented, or selectively used. The judiciary, too, does not always ensure the uniform administration of justice. However, for the poor and marginalized, who find their rights being violated by state and non-state actors, the judiciary, at times, is the only hope for the pursuit of justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial System in India a Critical Study
    International Journal of Law International Journal of Law ISSN: 2455-2194; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.12 Received: 02-08-2020; Accepted: 17-08-2020; Published: 03-09-2020 www.lawjournals.org Volume 6; Issue 5; 2020; Page No. 29-35 Judicial system in India a critical study Janmejay Singh Pursuing Ph. D. in Law, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, India Abstract Man is a social being. The society is characterized by the interdependence of men. This interdependence serves various purposes and needs. But it also gives rise to a conflict of individual interest with social interest. To settle this conflict certain norms and rules are made by the society. These rules are enforced by some kind of sanctions which settle the conflict under the wider wings of equity, justice and good conscience which are and have been gradually recognized by the state. The intervention of the state through its organs is necessary for fair play. It is at this stage that the quest for justice becomes significant The nations which do not ensure to its people justice without delay are destined to doom and loose their identity sooner or later. In our country, the Justice Delivery System has reached on the verge of collapse. To make a critical analysis of present Indian judicial system and the impact on the society give suggestion like A.D.R. The topic of the present research is an attempt to study the present state of affairs of the Justice Delivery System, its problems like the biggest problem of delay, expensiveness being the reason of docket exclusion, uncertainty and lack of infrastructure etc., the identification of causes and concrete suggestions so as to ensure the true spirit of the Preamble of the Constitution of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover-64 Report-Law and Justice-13-14
    REPORT NO. 64 PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICE SIXTY FOURTH REPORT The Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2013 (Presented to the Rajya Sabha on 9th December, 2013) (Laid on the Table of Lok Sabha on 9th December, 2013) Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi December, 2013/Agrahayana, 1935 (Saka) Website: http://rajyasabha.nic.in E-mail: [email protected] 117 Hindi version of this publication is also available CS (P & L) - 127 PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICE SIXTY FOURTH REPORT The Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2013 (Presented to the Rajya Sabha on 9th December, 2013) (Laid on the Table of Lok Sabha on 9th December, 2013) Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi December, 2013/Agrahayana, 1935 (Saka) CONTENTS PAGES 1. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE ......................................................................................... (i)-(ii) 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ (iii)-(iv) 3. ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. (v) 4. REPORT ................................................................................................................................... 1—9 A. Overview......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Review
    NON MAJOR ELECTIVE PAPER I ​ INDIAN POLITICS FOR CIVIL SERVICES EXAM ​ Paper Name:Indian Politics For Civil Services Exam Paper code :18BPO5EL Class : III B.A B.Com B.Sc Faculty Name : V.Senthil Kumar PHONE NUMBER : 9944004231 UNIT 2 POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF INDIAN PRESIDENT President and Vice President election, the process of election, their qualifications, roles and functions of the President and Vice-President, Election and removal, Powers enjoyed and functions performed by the President can be studied under the following heads, 1. Executive powers 2. Legislative powers 3. Financial powers 4. Judicial powers 5. Diplomatic powers 6. Military powers 7. Emergency powers Emergency Powers National emergency (Article 352) Presidential rule (Article 356) Financial emergency (Article 360) Powers and Functions of Prime Minister and his council Constitutional Powers Powers and Functions Relation to council ministers In relation to the President In relation to the Parliament Legislative and Executive Powers Supreme Court Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial body of India and the highest court of India under the constitution . it is the most senior constitutional court , had has the power of judicial review. The chief justice of India is the head and the chief judge of the supreme court and the court consists of a maximum of 34 judges and its has extensive powers in the form of original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions ii is regarded as the most powerful public institution in india. ​ JUDICIAL REVIEW Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws, acts and governmental actions that are incompatible with a higher authority: an executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful or a statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Nu NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, DELHI Delhi Prof
    ilitFt&t,l FqIUi€rqil nu NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, DELHI DELHi Prof. (Dr.) G. S. Bajpai Registrar NOTIFICATION NLUD/REG/2020/t Dated 24tn September 2020 Sub: Notification of Appointment of Prof, (Dr.) Srikrishna Deva Rao as the Vice-Chancellor, National Law University Delhi ln pursuance to the recommendation of the Governing Council vide its meeting dated 23'd September 2020, the Chancellor, NLU Delhi, vide his letter dated 23 September 2020, as per the provisions of National Law University Act 2007 (Delhi Act No. 1 of 2008) as amended by Act 7 of 2009 is'pleased to appoint Prof. (Dr,) Srikrishna Deva Rao as the Vice-Chancellor of National Law University Delhi for a period of five years from the date of resumption of charge or till the age of 70-years whichever is earlier, Prof, (Dr,) Srikrishna Deva Rao has joined his duties as the Vice-Chancellor on 24th September 2020. Copy of the above is forwarded to the following for information: t, Hon'ble Mr. Justice, N.V. Ramana, Judge, Supreme Court of India and Visitor of National Law University Delhi 2. Hon'ble Mr, Justice Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, Chief Justice of Delhi High Court & Chancellor, National Law University Delhi 3, Chairman and Members of Governing Council, Executive Council, Academic Council and Finance Committee of National Law Universitv Delhi. A University of Law established in 2008 by Act No. 1 of 2008 of Delhi (Accredited in rA' grade with a score 3.59 on a four point scale by NAAC) Sector - 140 Dwarka, New Delhi - 110 078 India I Tet: +91 11 2303 4255 | Fax: +91 112803 4254 E-mail: [email protected] I website: www.nludelhi.ac.in 4' Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunshine in the Courts Ranking the High Courts on Their Compliance with the RTI Act
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN Sunshine in the Courts Ranking the High Courts on their Compliance with the RTI Act Supported by WWW.LIVELAW.IN Acknowledgements About The Authors This Report is an independent, non-commissioned piece Vaidehi Misra, Chitrakshi Jain, Tarika Jain and Shreya Tripathy of academic work. The authors would like to thank Tata are Research Fellows at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy Trusts for their support. The funding for the report is part of working in the Judicial Reforms Initiative. Prashant Reddy T. “Vidhi-Tata Trusts Fellowship,” under which fellows undertake is a Senior Resident Fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy research under the Justice, Access, and Lowering Delays and leads the Judicial Reforms Initiative. All the fellows who in India (JALDI) project. This multi-year initiative aims to worked on this report are Vidhi-Tata Trusts Fellows. advocate for and implement evidence-based reforms to eliminate existing backlog in courts, and ensure that cases are The Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy is an independent think- disposed within reasonable timelines. tank doing legal research to make better laws and improve governance for the public good. The authors would like to thank Mr. Shailesh Gandhi, former Information Commissioner the Central Information This report has been designed by Kunal Agnihotri. Commission, for reviewing this report and providing his valuable comments. Reshma Sekhar, Research Fellow at For more information, see www.vidhilegalpolicy.in Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, is also thanked for her inputs on the report. The authors are also grateful to Divya Dhavan, Contact us at [email protected] Jyoti Shankar Nayak, Megha Katheria, Pallavi Khatri, Saachi Agrawal and Vaidik Bajpai who as interns provided assistance October 2019 for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Answered on 07.08.2013 Judicial Accountability 52
    8/11/2015 Untitled Page GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO 52 ANSWERED ON 07.08.2013 JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY 52 . Azad Shri Kirti (Jha) Sule Supriya Will the Minister of LAW AND JUSTICE be pleased to state:­ (a) whether the Government is aware of the alleged corruption in judiciary; (b) if so, the steps taken/proposed to be taken to address the issue and to bring in structural reforms in the judicial system; (c) the current status of the proposal to set up All India Judicial Service; (d) whether the Government plans to bring in fairness and transparency in the selection of High Court Judges and also ensure accountability in judicial system; and (e) if so, the details thereof? ANSWER MINISTER OF LAW AND JUSTICE AND COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SHRI KAPIL SIBAL) (a) to (e) A Statement is laid on the Table of the House Statement referred to in reply to parts (a) to (e) of the Lok Sabha Starred Question No.52 to be answered on 07.08.2013 regarding ‘Judicial Accountability’. (a) and (b) Representations alleging corruption in judiciary are received in the Government from time to time. As per the established “in­house mechanism” for the higher judiciary, the Chief Justice of India is competent to receive complaints against the conduct of the Judges of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of the High Courts. Similarly, the Chief Justices of the High Courts are competent to receive complaints against the conduct of Judges of their Courts. Administrative control over the members of the subordinate judiciary in the States vests with the concerned High Court.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Court at Calcutta 150 Years : an Overview
    1 2 The High Court at Calcutta 150 Years : An Overview 3 Published by : The Indian Law Institute (West Bengal State Unit) iliwbsu.in Printed by : Ashutosh Lithographic Co. 13, Chidam Mudi Lane Kolkata 700 006 ebook published by : Indic House Pvt. Ltd. 1B, Raja Kalikrishna Lane Kolkata 700 005 www.indichouse.com Special Thanks are due to the Hon'ble Justice Indira Banerjee, Treasurer, Indian Law Institute (WBSU); Mr. Dipak Deb, Barrister-at-Law & Sr. Advocate, Director, ILI (WBSU); Capt. Pallav Banerjee, Advocate, Secretary, ILI (WBSU); and Mr. Pradip Kumar Ghosh, Advocate, without whose supportive and stimulating guidance the ebook would not have been possible. Indira Banerjee J. Dipak Deb Pallav Banerjee Pradip Kumar Ghosh 4 The High Court at Calcutta 150 Years: An Overview तदॆततत- क्षत्रस्थ क्षत्रैयद क्षत्र यद्धर्म: ।౛`& 1B: । 1Bद्धर्म:1Bत्पटैनास्ति।`抜֘टै`抜֘$100 नास्ति ।`抜֘$100000000स्ति`抜֘$1000000000000स्थक्षत्रैयदत । तस्थ क्षत्रै यदर्म:।౛`& 1Bण । ﾴC:\Users\सत धर्म:" ।౛`&ﲧ1Bशैसतेधर्मेण।h अय अभलीयान् भलीयौसमाशयनास्ति।`抜֘$100000000 भलीयान् भलीयौसमाशयसर्म: ।౛`& य राज्ञाज्ञा एवम एवर्म: ।౛`& 1B ।। Law is the King of Kings, far more powerful and rigid than they; nothing can be mightier than Law, by whose aid, as by that of the highest monarch, even the weak may prevail over the strong. Brihadaranyakopanishad 1-4.14 5 Copyright © 2012 All rights reserved by the individual authors of the works. All rights in the compilation with the Members of the Editorial Board. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]