DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effect of Turnaround Migration on the Rural Landscape

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effect of Turnaround Migration on the Rural Landscape The Effect of Turnaround Migration on the Rural Landscape: A study o~ Grayson county, Virginia by James F. Shepherd thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Department of Landscape Architecture APPROVED: Benjamin C. Johnson, Jeanne B. Howard Chairman Linda A. Irvine Jean H. Speer March, 1986 Blacksburg, Virginia The Effect of Turnaround Migration on the Rural Landscape: A study of Grayson County, Virginia by James F. Shepherd Benjamin C. Johnson, Chairman Department of Landscape Architecture (ABSTRACT) Research has shown that more people are migrating to rural areas from urban ones. Rural areas are now composed of a variety of residents from different social and economic backgrounds. Because of this variety of residents, potential for social conflicts exists. One area of possible conflict is the difference in attitudes regarding land use and objectives for the rural landscape. Some planners and sociologists believe a better understanding of the impact of urban migration on the rural landscape is needed. The future character of the rural landscape is uncertain. This research will concentrate on the potential conflicts in attitudes toward the rural landscape among the different groups of residents who now live there. From the possible research questions raised in this area of study, the following hypothesis is suggested: Rural natives and non- natives have a shared interest in preserving the character of the rural landscape.in which they reside. Testing this hypothesis should provide the land use planner and the landscape architect with a framework with which to evaluate plans and decisions for rural areas. The study area for this research will be Grayson County, Virginia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people supported and encouraged me while working on this thesis. First, I would like to thank the numerous people I interviewed in Grayson County who welcomed me into their homes and offices and were willing to share some of their time. Second, I would like to thank my thesis committee. I thank Jeanne Howard for her encouragement and interest in rural-urban issues. I thank Linda Irvine for her support and enthusiasm. I thank Jean Speer for sharing her keen insight into the people of Appalachia and for introducing me to different ways of research. I am also grateful to her of all the help she gave before and during my presentation at the Blue Ridge Parkway 50th Anniversary Conference. I thank my committee chairman, Ben Johnson, for his initial encouragement, his constant belief in the project and for his friendship during my tenure at Virginia Tech. Third, I thank my classmates: Brian, Cary, Ron, Warren, Bunny, Liza and Leslie for their companionship throughout our graduate study strug- gles, triumphs and pleasures (particularly the lunches). I would also like to thank Lynn for her help with SPSS and Maxine and Nora for an- swering all my questions about word processing. Last, I would like to thank my family for their constant love and support. I especially thank my mother, a Grayson County native, for all her love and giving me an appreciation for the rural landscape. Acknowledgements iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Intr-oduction 1 Study Area: Grayson County, Virginia 3 Grayson County Location Map 4 Resear-ch Dir-ection 7 Research Question 9 Liter-atur-e Review 12 Historical Background 12 Current Migration Trends 16 Current Studies 18 Method 23 Gathering Background Knowledge and Selection of Sample 24 Development of Interview Format 27 Collection of Data 28 Tabulation and Analysis of Data 29 Conclusions and Recommendations 30 Method Flow Chart 32 Results and Discussion 33 Grayson County Magisterial Districts 34 Proposed Blue Ridge Dam Project 40 Table of Contents iv Conclusions and Reconanendations 60 Recommendations 65 Bibliography 68 Appendix A. Primary Documents 71 Appendix B. Frequencies 77 Appendix c. Biographical Data Sheet 93 Appendix D. Native Interview Format 95 Appendix E. Non-native Interview Format 98 Appendix F. Code Book 101 Appendix G. Field Note Form 113 Appendix H. Tape Log Form 115 Appendix I. Release Form 117 Vita 118 Table of Contents v INTRODUCTION Census data indicate that the rural population continues to increase. The first significant evidence of the shift from urban to rural areas in population patterns occurred in 1970. A new phenomenon has been taking place: non-metropolitan areas are growing at a faster rate than metro- politan ones (Marans and Wellman, 1978). Growth in rural areas now ex- ceeds that of metropolitan counties. This shift in population growth from rural-to-urban to urban-to-rural is termed turnaround migration (Marans and Wellman, 1978). Most rural population growth is occurring in and around small rural cities and towns (Zube, 1977). Although each rural area may possess unique characteristics, there are several common factors which contribute to turnaround migration (Marans and Wellman 1978, Zube 1977, Stephenson 1984, Healy and Short 1981, Schwarzweller 1979, Schiefelbien 1977, Shelly 1978, Dubbink 1984). • Industries locate in rural areas providing employment. • Transportation and highway systems are improved. • A great number of national parks and recreational areas are created. • Dissatisfaction with the urban environment attracts many retirees, recreationists and persons seeking a different lifestyle. Introduction 1 • Development of residential areas in a variety of price ranges makes the rural areas more accessible to a larger economic market. Because the diverse groups of rural residents have different attitudes regarding their residential environment, potential for social conflicts exists for the rural landscape (Healy and Short, 1981). Understanding social conflict in areas experiencing turnaround migration is vital to rural areas which want to retain their non-urban quality of life (Wellman 1980). Turnaround migration may upset the rural sense of community (Wellman 1980). If we want to retain a rural quality of life, we need a better understanding of conflicts which might occur in the rural commu- nity. The community plays an important role in people's social well-being (Wellman 1980). Currently, the rural landscape is clouded by a shared desire to live in a rural community that "conceals quite divergent con- cepts and objectives" (Dubbink, 1984). Rural population growth is bringing about changes in land use as well as the appearance of the rural landscape (Zube, 1977). Land use seldom has a single purpose. It is closely linked to food production, energy use, environmental quality and rural and urban development. These mul- tiple areas must be considered when studying land use (Chicoine, Scott and Jones, 1980). Growth and development is an obvious source of conflict when consid- ering land use in the rural landscape. In too many cases growth is en- couraged without consideration of how to control it. Robert B. Riley ( 1977) asks an important question: "How do we introduce new settlers with all their paraphernalia of affluence into the landscape without destroy- Introduction 2 ing those very amenities which they came to enjoy?" Presently, "rural sprawl" is being created, a sprawl of houses along both sides of every good road out of town (Riley, 1977). If rural areas are to prosper, they must be different from cities and suburbs (Riley, 1977). The complexity of the problem appears overwhelming. Riley thinks such an enormous job of planning for the rural landscape should not start with money, new tax structures or political channels, but with considering the needs of people who live in the countryside now (Riley, 1977). "After two decades of grappling with the complexities of urban civilization, we are learning, painfully, that the 'big' problems of money and land own- ership and political authority often turn out to be less important than the attitudes of people" (Riley, 1977). Study Area: Grayson County, Virginia Riley (1977) believes it is best to study an area where new principles for the rural landscape will have the potential to create the most change. These are regions with few people, where present poverty exists in a landscape of underdeveloped richness (Riley, 1977). Grayson County, Virginia is a rural area appropriate for such a study. Introduction 3 Grayson County Location Map ··-0 ®--·-··-- .® s·-··--·- Introduction 4 An operational definition of the term rural area is needed to clarify what is meant by rural for Grayson County. As populations change, the term rural is becoming more and more ambiguous. Rural sociologists have been grappling with a general definition for rural for a long time. One approach to the definition has been any area which is not urban. Some demographers define rural in terms of population size and density. How- ever, this does not consider culture or lifestyle and yet another con- sideration is geographical area or region. Culture and lifestyle are terms in which to define rural in Grayson County. Due to isolation and low density of population the area has known few 20th century intrusions. Culture and lifestyle center on agriculture of small self-sufficient farms which have been slow to accept change. Schoenbaum (1979) describes the upper New River Valley, consisting of Grayson County, Virginia and Ashe and Alleghany Counties in North Carolina as: A unique, unified mountain region, very different from the steep- sided gorges of the lower valley or the broader middle valley of Virginia. The winding courses of the New River and its tributaries enclose rich bottoms of seventy-five to two hundred acres against the curve of the hills, creating an almost perfect setting for small farms units. The geographic characteristic was the determining factor in the cultural and economic evolution of the area. A history of isolation has resulted in the "rural" culture and lifestyle of Grayson County remaining relatively unaffected until the 1970's (Schoebaum 1979). The area also differs from other parts of Appalachia in the absence of coal and coal mining.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watauga County Survey, 2003
    Historic and Architectural Resources of Watauga County, North Carolina, ca. 1763-1952 Tony VanWinkle September 2003 [Prepared in MPDF format but not submitted to NPS] NPSForm10-900-b OMBNo.1024-0018 (Revised March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. NewSubmission AmendedSubmission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic and Architectural Resources of Watauga County, North Carolina, ca. 1763-1952. B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) I. Prehistory, Exploration, and Early Euro-American Settlement, pre-1800. II. Settlement Patterns and the Formation of the County, 1800-1850. III. Growth, Change, and Distinction: 1842-1900. IV. Modernization: Transportation, Extractive Industry, and the Ascendancy of National Influences, 1900-1952. C. Form Prepared by name/title Tony VanWinkle, Preservation Specialist organization North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office date 9/9/2003 street&number 1VillageLane,Suite3 telephone 828/274-6789 cityortownAsheville stateNC zipcode28803-2677 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Watauga County Heritage Development Plan
    Watauga County Heritage Development Plan Prepared by The Watauga Heritage Council Updated September 2008 WATAUGA HERITAGE COUNCIL TEAM ROSTER Name Affiliation Contact Information 1. Dan Meyer Boone Area Chamber of Commerce [email protected] President 828-264-2225 2. Charles Hardin Blowing Rock Chamber of Commerce [email protected] Executive Director 828-295-7851 3. Cherry Johnson Watauga County Arts Council [email protected] Executive Director 828-264-1789 4. Cathy Robbins Tweetsie Railroad [email protected] Marketing Director 828-264-9061 5. Pat Beaver ASU Appalachian Studies Center [email protected] Director 828-262-4089 6. Mike Evans ASU Hospitality Management [email protected] Professor 828-262-6222 7. Mac Forehand Boone CVB [email protected] Director 828-262-3516 8. Chuck Watkins Appalachian Cultural Museum [email protected] Director 828-262-3117 10. CeCe Conway Appalachian State University [email protected] Professor 828-262-2350 11. Joe Furman Watauga Economic Development [email protected] Director 828-265-8043 12. Sheri Moretz Mast General Store [email protected] Public Relations Specialist 828-963-6511 13. Anne Burgess Middle Fork Greenway Association [email protected] President 828-264-3754 14. Bettie Bond Appalachian Cultural Museum [email protected] 828-262-3117 15. Tuesdae Rice Downtown Boone Development [email protected] Director 828-262-4532 17. Jeff Clark Hayes Performing Arts Center [email protected] Executive Director 828-295-0119 18. Tracy Brown Blowing Rock TDA [email protected] 828-295-4636 19. Rob Holton Watauga County TDA [email protected] 828-964-1500 19. Karin Moss High Country Host [email protected] 828-264-2120 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Summarize the Initiatives Identified on the Following Pages
    Alleghany County Heritage Development Plan Blue Ridge Parkway in Alleghany County Prepared by The Alleghany Heritage Council 1 Blue Ridge National Heritage Area NARRATIVE SUMMARY Alleghany County is North Carolina’s eastern most county in the Blue Ridge. Bordered by Virginia on the north, and Ashe, Wilkes and Surry counties on the west, south and east respectively, it is 235 square miles with an average elevation of approximately 2,700 feet. It is the state’s fifth smallest county in land area and sixth smallest in population with around 10,000 residents. Sparta, its county seat and only municipality, sits at the crossroads of US 21 and NC 18. Alleghany is shaped by the land. The Crest of the Blue Ridge — the Eastern Continental Divide — forms the eastern and southern border and is home to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Alleghany is fortunate to have Cumberland Knob, where construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway began in l935, and Doughton Park, the largest and most diverse of the Parkway’s recreational areas. Portions of Stone Mountain State Park and New River State Park are also within Alleghany’s boundaries. The county is principally drained by the New River, which flows along the western and northern border, and its main tributary, the Little River, which runs through the central portion of the county. The North Carolina portion of the New River is designated a National Scenic River and offers camping and other recreational opportunities along its shores. For years, the Blue Ridge Mountains were not a vantage point, but rather a barrier separating Alleghany from the rest of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Facts Concerning Appalachian and Western North Carolina
    Colonel B en n eha n Cameron , Cha irm a n , C . B o wie Hon . T . , . Major W . C . Heath , E xec u tive Com m ittee , 8 . Special Commissio n , A . W N . C Railroad , Gentlemen a 9 2 3 Following instructions given me by your Committee , in M y, 1 , organizations were perfected and work gotten under way for making three Wes preliminary surveys , to determine the location for the Appalachian and tern North Ca rolina Railroad . These three Projects are as follows Ashe County Project , Alleghany County Project , Watauga County Project . Later it was decided to add an additional project , namely Taylorsville P roject . The first meeting of the Executive Committee was held at North Wilkesboro , and was attended by the Chief Engineer as well a s the Consult ing Engineer . At this meeting it was decided by the Committee that the three original projects should be confined to a maximum of eight degree curvature and one per cent . compensated grades against east bound traffic , - and one and one half per cent . compensated grades a gainst west bound tra fli c . r Later , when the Taylo sville Project was added , it was decided that curvature o limitati ns for this project should be ten degrees maximum , and that the tw e gradient limitations should be o per c nt . compensated in either direction . The maps covering all fo u r projects have been prepared and the p ro j e c tions made within the prescribed limitations . Taking them up in their respective order , a detailed description follows ASHE COUNTY PROJECT Starting at the western terminus of the Wilkesboro Branch of South i ern Ra lway , this project extends through Wilkes and Ashe Counties , North 3 Carolina , and Johnson County , Tennessee , distance of miles to a connection with the Big S tone Gap - Mountain City Branch of Southern Railway, at Mountain City , Tennessee .
    [Show full text]
  • Perry – Shepherd Farm, Ashe County
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Office of Archives and History Department of Cultural Resources NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Perry-Shepherd Farm Lansing, Ashe County, AH0108, Listed 4/5/2006 Nomination by Sherry Joines Wyatt Photographs by Sherry Joines Wyatt, July 2005 Overall view of farm, looking northeast Façade view NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Perry-Shepherd Farm other names/site number Shepherd, Swansie Farm 2. Location street & number 410 Swansie Shepherd Rd. not for publication N/A city or town Lansing vicinity X state North Carolina code NC county Ashe code 009 zip code 28643 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X_ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Laud Utilization in the New and Watauga River Basins Of
    LAUD UTILIZATION IN THE NEW AND WATAUGA RIVER BASINS OF NORTH CAROLINA DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By- Edgar Bingham, B. A*, M. S. The Ohio State University 1954 Approved bys Adviser Department of Geography i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The writer would like to acknowledge the assistance and encouragement given by the entire Department of Geography at the Ohio State University. He would especially like to express ap­ preciation to: Dr. Roderick Peattie, his adviser, for aid in or­ ganizing the field of study and for many helpful suggestions dur­ ing the course of the study; Dr. Alfred J, Wright, for constructive criticism and inspiration during the summer of 195-4} and Dr. Guy- Harold Smith, for suggestions concerning the organization of this study and for advice freely offered throughout the writer's at­ tendance at the Ohio State University. Also, gratitude is hereby extended to the many individuals, agencies, and companies who aided in the accumulation of the basic data necessary to complete this study. Interviews were secured with farmers, merchants, businessmen, industrial representatives, and agents of the various governmental departments serving the New- Watauga region and the information thus recieved forms an integral part of the study. To these few groups and individuals mentioned and to many not mentioned the writer expresses his most sincere thanks. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement i List of Figures vi List of Tables ii CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II - THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE 7 A. Physiography 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Itional Register of Historic Places Multiple Property
    , 10·900·b (Rev. 8/2002) OMS No. 1024·0018 (Expires 1·31·2009) ~tates Department of the Interior Park Service .Itional Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form I his fann is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instrucllons in How to Complete the Multiple Properly Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 168). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor. or computer to complete all items. _X_ New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing H istOlic and Architectural Resources of Ashe County, North Carolina, c.1799 - 1955 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, Identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Topography, Geography, Prehistory and Settlement of Ashe County Through 1860 Slavery, the Civil War, and the Age of the Yeoman Farmer: 1860 - 1915 ~-hange Comes with a Full Head of Steam: 1915-1929 '\ ational Crisis, Local Impact: 1930 - 1955 "'she County After 1955 :::. Form Prepared by 1a me/title __S",lccle""n.c.·yLJ""o",i""ne",s,-W-'-'-.ly",a",tt",a""n""d",L",o,,,r!...i T"-,,,o I""h",,' v-"el!...'-",J o"'n"'e"'s _______________ ;tl'eet & number 21 E. Main Street, Suite 202 telephone (540) 381-3336 ity or town _-,=C",lll=·i=st",ia",l""ls",b-"Ul,",·g~ __________s.tate VA zip code 24073 ). Certification 5 the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Know Your Own State- North Carolina
    Gr2- (o Vol. IV. No. 11 March 1, 1925 UNIVERSITY EXTENSION DIVISION UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA EXTENSION BULLETIN 1 KNOW YOUR OWN STATE- NORTH CAROLINA A PROGRAM FOR WOMEN’S CLUBS <Sy S. H. HOBBS, Jr. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS CHAPEL HILL, N. C. Entered as Second-Class Matter October ig, 1921 EXTENSION BULLETINS Vol. I, No. 1. University Extension Service. Free. Vol. I, No. 6. The Rural Playground. Harold D. Meyer. Price 25c. Vol. I, No. 7. Attainable Standards in Municipal Programs. Edited by Howard W. Odum. Price 60c. Vol. I, No. 11. The Church and Landless Men. L. G. Wilson and Others. Free. Vol. I, No. 14. Play Production for Amateurs. F. H. Koch and Others. Price 50c. Vol. II, No. 4. Town Studies. A Program for Women’s Clubs. Harold D. Meyer. Price 50c. Vol. II, No. 6 . The Enforcement of Railroad Labor Board Decisions. Debate Handbook. Compiled by E. R. Rankin. Price 50c. Vol. II, No. 6. How Farm Tenants Live. J. A. Dickey and E. C. Branson. Price 50c. Vol. II, No. 7. The Parent-Teacher Association. Handbook. Revised Edi- tion. Harold D. Meyer. Price 50c. Vol. II, No. 10. The Commencement Program. Harold D. Meyer. Price 50c. Vol. II, No. 11. Relativity—A Romance of Science. Archibald Henderson, Price $1.00. Vol. II, No. 12. Recent Tendencies in the Theatre. A Program for Women’s Clubs. Dougald MacMillan. Price 50c. Vol. II, No. 13. Agricultural Graphics. North Carolina and the United States, 1866-1922. H. R. Smedes. Price $1.00. Vol. II.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Education in Appalachia: East Tennessee State Normal School and Appalachian State Normal School Holly Heacock
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Undergraduate Honors Theses Student Works 5-2017 Progressive Education in Appalachia: East Tennessee State Normal School and Appalachian State Normal School Holly Heacock Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/honors Part of the Appalachian Studies Commons, Cultural History Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Public History Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Heacock, Holly, "Progressive Education in Appalachia: East Tennessee State Normal School and Appalachian State Normal School" (2017). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 378. https://dc.etsu.edu/honors/378 This Honors Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Holly Heacock East Tennessee State University Undergraduate Thesis: Spring, 2017 Progressive Education in Appalachia: East Tennessee State Normal School and Appalachian State Normal School 2 Progressive education is a pedagogical movement that began in the late nineteenth century. Progressive education, a new form of liberal ideas and educational reform, emerged during the late nineteenth century and supported children both as learners and as citizens. In the rural areas of Appalachia during the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century most students did not have the money to attend private schools, and if they were able to attend school, they often did not have the opportunities to attend high school or college because so few opportunities existed.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamorphic Mountain, Mount Jefferson State Park: an Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for Grades 5-7
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 439 902 SE 063 014 AUTHOR Pittman, George K., II; Hubbard, William F.; Lambert, Michael D.; Beazley, Lea J. TITLE Metamorphic Mountain, Mount Jefferson State Park: An Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for Grades 5-7. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh. Div. of Parks and Recreation. PUB DATE 1999-03-00 NOTE 137p.; For an earlier edition, see ED 374 938. Originally printing funded by CP&L. AVAILABLE FROM North Carolina Div. of Parks and Recreation, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611-7687. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Earth Science; Environmental Education; *Geology; Intermediate Grades; Junior High Schools; *Minerals; Science Activities; Water IDENTIFIERS *North Carolina; State Parks ABSTRACT Mount Jefferson State Natural Area is located in the southern Blue Ridge highlands of North Carolina and covers 489 acres, which includes peaks and upper slopes to the Mount Jefferson mountain. This document introduces students to the geology of Mount Jefferson State Park and focuses on the geologic processes and rocks and minerals of Mount Jefferson. Major concepts covered include the rock types and their uses, rock cycle, weathering and erosion, rock and mineral identification, geologic history, and resource use. Three types of activities are featured:(1) pre-visit activities;(2) on-site activities; and (3) post-visit activities. The pre-visit activities will introduce students to the different rock types, how rocks are formed, how to identify them, and how they weather. Students will also learn about geologic time scale and identify the geologic belts of North Carolina.
    [Show full text]