DOCSLIB.ORG

Freshwater Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UPGRADE OF ROAD D4407 BETWEEN HLUVUKANI AND TIMBAVATI (7.82 KM), ROAD D4409 AT WELVERDIEND (6.88 KM) AND ROAD D4416/2 BETWEEN WELVERDIEND AND ROAD P194/1 (1.19 KM) IN THE BOHLABELA REGION OF THE MPUMALANGA PROVINCE FRESHWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT PREPARED FOR: COMPILED BY: DATED: March 2020 www.ncc-group.co.za D4407 Road Upgrade Freshwater Assessment Report – Mar 2020 Page 1 of 105 DOCUMENT CONTROL TITLE: Upgrade of Road D4407 between Hluvukani and Timbavati (7.82 Km), Road D4409 At Welverdiend (6.88 Km) and Road D4416/2 between Welverdiend And Road P194/1 (1.19 Km) in the Bohlabela Region of the Mpumalanga Province LOCATION: Bohlabela Region of the Mpumalanga Province CLIENT: Lidwala Consulting Engineers CONSULTANT: NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd DOCUMENT NUMBER: TBC REVISION: 00 DATE: 18/03/2020 CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE: AUTHOR: Etiene Roux Craig Burne Project Engineer Freshwater Ecologist T · 082 852 5323 T · 078 467 3685 E · [email protected] E · [email protected] REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: Jonathan Szoke Operations Manager: SHERQ Consulting T · 083 232 6356 in E · [email protected] REVIEWED BY: NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd D4407 Road Upgrade Freshwater Assessment Report – Mar 2020 Page 2 of 105 Reg No: 2007/023691/07 DOCUMENT GUIDE The table below provides the 2014 NEMA requirements (as amended) for specialist reports and the relevant sections in the report where these requirements are addressed: EIA Regulations Description Page/Section 2014, GN982 in the report (as amended in 2017) Appendix 6 (a) A specialist report prepared in terms of these Regulations must contain details of— Page 3 i. the specialist who prepared the report; and Also see BAR ii. the expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae Appendix 6 (b) A declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be specified by the Page 3 competent authority Appendix 6 (c) An indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared Sections 2, 4 & 5 Appendix 6 (cA) An indication of the quality and age of base data used for the specialist report Sections 8, 9 & referenced throughout Appendix 6 (cB) A description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of the proposed Sections 8 & 9 development and levels of acceptable change Appendix 6 (d) The duration, date and season of the site investigation and the relevance of the season Section 8 to the outcome of the assessment Appendix 6 (e) A description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the Section 8 specialised process inclusive of equipment and modelling used Appendix 6 (f) Details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the Maps in proposed activity or activities and its associated structures and infrastructure, inclusive Sections 3, 9 of a site plan identifying site alternatives & Annexures I & M Also see BAR Appendix 6 (g) An identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers Sections 9, 10 & Annexure N Appendix 6 (h) A map superimposing the activity including the associated structures and Section 9 infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; Appendix 6 (i) A description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps in knowledge; Sections 6, 7 & Annexure K Appendix 6 (j) A description of the findings and potential implications of such findings on the impact Section 9 & of the proposed activity or activities Annexure N Appendix 6 (k) Any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; Section 10 & Annexure N Appendix 6 (l) Any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation; Section 10 & Annexure N Appendix 6 (m) Any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or environmental Section 10 & authorisation; Annexure N Appendix 6 (n) A reasoned opinion— Sections 11 & i. whether the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised; 12 (iA) regarding the acceptability of the proposed activity or activities; and ii. if the opinion is that the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr, and where applicable, the closure plan; Appendix 6 (o) A description of any consultation process that was undertaken during the course of See BAR preparing the specialist report; Appendix 6 (p) A summary and copies of any comments received during any consultation process and See BAR where applicable all responses thereto Appendix 6 (q) Any other information requested by the competent authority. None NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd D4407 Road Upgrade Freshwater Assessment Report – Mar 2020 Page 3 of 105 Reg No: 2007/023691/07 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE I, Craig Burne, as duly authorised representative of NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd (NCC), hereby confirm my independence as a specialist and declare that neither I nor NCC have any interest; be it business, financial, personal or other, in any proposed activity, application or appeal in respect of NCC being appointed as environmental assessment practitioner in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), other than fair remuneration for the work performed. This is specifically in connection with the appointment of NCC, by Lidwala Consulting Engineers, to undertake a NEMA Section 24G Rectification Process via Basic Assessment for the Upgrade of road D4407 between HluvukanI and Timbavati, Road D4409 at Welverdiend and road D4416/2 between Welverdiend and road P194/1 in the Bohlabela region of the Mpumalanga Province. In terms of the prerequisites of the Natural Scientific Professions, 2003 (Act No. 27 of 2003) and as a registered member of the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions, I will undertake my profession in accordance with the Code of Conduct of the Council. I declare this study to be my own work prepared independently of any influence or prejudice with respect to any other party where the findings and conclusions have been made, to the best of my ability, with objective and truthful intention. Signed: Craig Burne Pr.Sci.Nat. MSc (Freshwater Ecology) 18 March 2020 NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd D4407 Road Upgrade Freshwater Assessment Report – Mar 2020 Page 4 of 105 Reg No: 2007/023691/07 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lidwala Consulting Engineers SA (Pty) Ltd (Lidwala) were appointed by the Mpumalanga Province, Department of Public Works, Roads and Transport (DPWRT) for the planning, design, tender documentation, and construction supervision for the “Upgrading of road D4407 between Hluvukani and Timbavati (7.82 km), road D4409 at Welverdiend (6.88 km) and road D4416/2 between Welverdiend and road P194/1 (1.19 km) in the Bohlabela region of the Mpumalanga Province”. NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd (NCC) were appointed by Lidwala to conduct a NEMA Section 24G application after it was confirmed that the road upgrade project triggered NEMA listed activity no. 19 of Listing Notice 1 and listed activity no. 14 of Listing Notice 3. Construction activity subsequently commenced without acquiring the mandatory environmental authorisation required for the project. In terms of the NEMA Section 24G rectification process, a freshwater assessment relating to freshwater resources (watercourses/drainage lines, riparian zones and wetlands) associated with the project is one of the specialist studies required as part of the basic environmental assessment process and application for environmental authorisation. NCC was duly appointed by Lidwala to conduct the freshwater assessment. An initial desktop study and literature review was conducted followed by field visit and ground-truth verification for purposes of more accurate delineation and mapping of freshwater resources in the broader study area. As part of the scope of the delineation, the 32m watercourse regulated area in terms of the NEMA EIA Regulations and the respective 100m and 500m watercourse and wetland regulated areas in terms of section 21 (c) & (i) of the National Water Act (NWA) were used for the delineation and for proposing buffers to afford protection to freshwater resources within the regulated area of the project footprint. Wetlands within the regulated area were classified and assessed in terms of their present ecological state and (PES) ecological importance and sensitivity (EIS) using the widely utilised tools namely Wet-Health (after Macfarlane et al., 2008), Wet-Ecoservices (after Kotze et al. 2009) and DWS EIS assessment criteria (after Kleynhans, 1999). Given the non-perennial nature of the watercourses in the study area and no flow underway at the time of the assessment, the components of freshwater aquatic systems typically included in an aquatic impact assessment were not possible to assess. No in-situ water quality assessment and no field-based assessments of macroinvertebrates, fish or vegetation were carried out. A riparian and instream habitat assessment using the Index of Habitat Integrity (IHI) (after Kleynhans, 1996) with background literature and studies and aerial imagery combined with the field observations informing the watercourse PES and EIS assessments. A risk assessment relating to potential impacts of the development on watercourses and freshwater biodiversity in NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd D4407 Road Upgrade Freshwater Assessment Report – Mar 2020 Page 5 of 105 Reg No: 2007/023691/07 terms of section 21 (c) and (i) of the NWA was carried out using the DWS-regulated risk matrix approach promulgated in GN509 dated 26th August 2016 and DEAT guidelines on impact assessment. Freshwater resource maps have been developed for the study area indicating the location of freshwater features. Six wetlands, two seep systems and four artificial benches (dams) were identified within 500m of the road and borrow pit footprints. Two drainage culvert road crossings and one bridge crossing are directly within non-perennial watercourses traversed by the existing gravel road.
Recommended publications
  • Local Economic Development Strategy Implementation Within Bushbuckridge Local Municipality

    Local Economic Development Strategy Implementation Within Bushbuckridge Local Municipality

    LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION WITHIN BUSHBUCKRIDGE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY BY LAZARUS LUCKY NKUNA A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Development Studies in the Department of Anthropology and Development Studies at the University of Zululand Supervisor: Dr PT Sabela Co-supervisor: Dr E.M Isike 2016 i DECLARATION I, Lazarus Lucky Nkuna, hereby declare that this dissertation submitted to the University of Zululand for the Degree of Master of Development Studies, has never been previously submitted by me for a degree at this or any other University, and that this is my own work and the material contained therein has been dully acknowledged and cited using the Harvard style of referencing. ___________________ _________________________ Signature Date ……………………………………. Lazarus Lucky Nkuna 2016 ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my late father, Moses Nkuna, to my daughter Mikhenso Miranda Nkuna, and to the entire Nkuna family. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank the Almighty God for taking me from nowhere, and for guiding me throughout my academic achievements. God has been the source of my strength, my pillar, my spiritual inspiration and has built and shaped my character throughout the study. I would like to take this opportunity to extend my deepest gratitude and acknowledgements to the following people for their valuable contributions in various ways which made it possible for me to complete this dissertation. My Supervisors, Doctor Primrose Thandekile Sabela and Dr Effe Marry Isike for the belief you had in me, motherly love, guidance provided and for reviving my hope and igniting the desire in me to finish this project.
  • Bushbuckridge-LED-Strategy-2010

    Bushbuckridge-LED-Strategy-2010

    Bushbuckridge Local Municipality Local Economic Development Strategy 2010 – 2014 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Process and Methodology ................................................................................................................. 14 1.1.1 Profile .................................................................................................................................... 15 1.1.2 Sector Plans ........................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.3 Ward Consultation ................................................................................................................. 16 1.1.4 Business Consultations ........................................................................................................... 18 1.1.5 Leadership Consultations ....................................................................................................... 18 1.2 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 19 1.3 Outcome ........................................................................................................................................... 20 1.4 Bushbuckridge Municipality IDP and Vision ........................................................................................ 21 1.5
  • Growing the Wildlife Economy in Bushbuckridge

    Growing the Wildlife Economy in Bushbuckridge

    1 Growing the Wildlife Economy in Bushbuckridge Master Plan prepared by Linkd Environmental Services for the Department of Environmental Affairs September 2013 Linkd Environmental Services 2 t: +27 11 486 4076 f: +27 866 717 236 e: [email protected] w: www.8linkd.com 3 Executive Summary The Bushbuckridge Master Plan is an integrated, multi-stakeholder sustainable development strategy for the Bushbuckridge area in Mpumalanga province, South Africa. The Bushbuckridge area possesses exceptional biodiversity and natural assets, with some of the most outstanding game experiences and well developed tourism products. But the region is also densely settled, with chronic poverty, poor economic growth, weak environmental management, a lack of capacity to exploit economic opportunities, and poor governance capacity. The situational analysis highlights that poverty, lack of infrastructure, poor catchment management and water scarcity are key threats to the ecological and economic integrity of Bushbuckridge. The state of the economy and poverty is further exacerbated by the approximately 3000 outstanding land claims in Mpumalanga Province, which threaten the political and economic stability of the region as long as they remain unresolved. Bushbuckridge is home to relocated people who were forcibly removed from their farms and now seek land restitution. Bushbuckridge has been identified as a poverty node and earmarked for the implementation of interventions aimed at creating sustainable employment and development. The Bushbuckridge Master Plan seeks to address these issues by presenting a comprehensive strategy to guide development through a multi-dimensional approach that addresses environmental management, economic development, development of skills, and strengthening of governance capacity and effectiveness. Drawing on the notion of sustainable development and the success of the wildlife and tourist economy in existing parks, the overarching concept of the BBR Master Plan is to develop an expanded tourist and wildlife economy and conservation estate in the BBR region.
  • Spatial Development Framework

    Spatial Development Framework

    BUSHBUCKRIDGE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY: SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Bushbuckridge Local Municipality: Spatial Development Framework TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................... 7 1.1 INTRODUCTION TO SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK ........... 7 1.2 HIERARCHY OF SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS ............... 8 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE SDF AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH LAND USE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM........................................................................ 9 2 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 13 3 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS .................... 15 4 LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ..................................................... 18 4.1 MUNICIPAL STRUCTURES ACT, 1998 ................................................ 19 4.2 MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS ACT, 2000 (ACT NO. 32 OF 2000) .................. 20 4.3 LAND USE MANAGEMENT BILL ......................................................... 21 4.4 DEVELOPMENT FACILITATION ACT, 1995 (ACT NO. 67 OF 1995) ... 23 4.5 LAND-USE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LUMS) ..................................... 26 4.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ................................................................................ 27 4.7 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1996 (ACT NO. 108 OF 1996) .................................................................................. 29 4.8 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1998) ...............................................................................................
  • Conservation Labour Geographies: Subsuming Regional Labour Into Private Conservation Spaces in South Africa

    Conservation Labour Geographies: Subsuming Regional Labour Into Private Conservation Spaces in South Africa

    Geoforum 123 (2021) 1–11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geoforum journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geoforum Conservation labour geographies: Subsuming regional labour into private conservation spaces in South Africa Lerato Thakholi Sociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University and Research, De Leeuwenborch, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, the Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Critical scholars have started analysing conservation as a ‘mode of production’, which entails conservation’s Primitive accumulation inclination to transform the value of nature into capital. This mode of production is underpinned by labour Social reproduction relations that have thus far escaped systematic analysis. To fill this gap, I use Smiths’ reading of the capitalist Production of space production of space to develop the concept of conservation labour geographies which untangles the spatial out­ Conservation labour geographies comes of the dialectical relation between the production of conservation space and labour. The concept is concretized through an analysis of the historical development of the private wildlife economy in the Lowveld area of South Africa. Through this case study I argue that private nature reserves subsume communal and state properties -beyond its fence- into exploitative symbiotic conservation labour geographies. I do this by firstly demonstrating that conservation labour geographies are an outcome of the historical production of conservation space because the development of the private wildlife economy in the Lowveld reinforced geographical differ­ entiation by reproducing a spatialized and racialised division of labour. Secondly, I show that these labour ge­ ographies are characterised by the unpaid reproductive work of spouses and in-laws, traumatised rangers, and a racially segregated landscapes within the reserve and between the reserves and the former Bantustans.
  • The Significance of the Local Trade in Natural Resource Products for Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation in South Africa

    The Significance of the Local Trade in Natural Resource Products for Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation in South Africa

    THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOCAL TRADE IN NATURAL RESOURCE PRODUCTS FOR LIVELIHOODS AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION IN SOUTH AFRICA SHEONA ELIZABETH SHACKLETON A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Environmental Science Faculty of Science RHODES UNIVERSITY June 2005 ABSTRACT What role can the commercialisation of natural resource products play in the efforts to reduce poverty and vulnerability and how can this be enhanced? With poverty alleviation at the top of the global development agenda, this is a question posed by many scholars, practitioners, donor agencies and government departments operating at the environment-development interface. However, recent commentary on this issue is mixed and ambiguous, with some observers being quite optimistic regarding the potential of these products, while others hold a counter view. This thesis explores the livelihood contributions and poverty alleviation potential of four products traded locally in the Bushbuckridge municipality, South Africa; namely traditional brooms, reed mats, woodcraft and a beer made from the fruits of Sclerocarya birrea . A common approach, employing both quantitative and qualitative methods, was used to investigate the harvesting, processing and marketing arrangements, sustainability and livelihood contributions of each product. The results illustrate that any inference regarding the potential of the trade to alleviate poverty depends on how poverty is defined and interpreted, and on whether the role of these products is assessed from a holistic livelihood perspective that includes notions of vulnerability, alternatives and choice, diversification and the needs of rural producers themselves. Overall, the products studied were key in enhancing the livelihood security of the poorest members of society, forming an important safety net and assisting in raising household incomes to levels equivalent to the wider population, but generally were unlikely, on their own, to provide a route out of poverty.