Studies of Less Familiar Birds 161 Booted Eagle R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Studies of Less Familiar Birds 161 Booted Eagle R Studies of less familiar birds 161 Booted Eagle R. F. Porter Photographs by Pierre Petit, M. D. England and A. N. H. Peach Plates j 2- j 8 The Booted Eagle Hkramtus pennatus is a small eagle similar in size to a Buzzard Buteo buteo, but of slimmer build, with narrower wings and a longer tail. In flight its proportions are not unlike those of a Black Kite Mikus migrans, though the tail is square-ended, not forked (plate 58). When perched, its long feathered tarsi, or 'boots', are characteristic (plate 53b). The species is dimorphic, a feature which, among European birds of prey, it shares only with Eleonora's Falcon Fa/co eleonorae. Many raptors show considerable plumage variations, but in most cases these take the form of clines from very pale to very dark through a whole range of intermediates. The Booted Eagle has two very distinct phases—a light and a dark. This dimorphism is exhibited by both sexes; breeding pairs frequently consist of one dark and one light and their offspring may be either light or dark. Both phases are brilliantly illustrated in plates 52-58. The light phase has a lightly streaked tawny-rufous head and neck, with a white forehead and superciliary stripe and dark tawny-brown ear-coverts and cheeks. The under-parts are white with rufous streaks on the chin, upper breast and flanks (plates 5 5 a and b), and the under wing-coverts are also white with brownish flecks (plate 5 8b). Im- matures look more 'gingery' below. The white under-parts extend on to the 'shoulder' to form a white patch (especially plate 5 2). The mantle and back are dark brown, with blackish primaries and secondaries, and there is a conspicuous broad bar of pale huffish-brown on the upper wing-coverts and scapulars, giving the upper-parts the appear­ ance of a well-marked Black Kite (plate 52 again). The upper tail- coverts are pale buffish-brown, contrasting with the brown back and brown tail; the latter is faintly barred with grey. The under tail- feathers are white with a varying amount of dark smudgy grey on the tips, particularly of the central feathers. The upper-parts of the dark phase (plates 54a and b) are similar to those of the light phase, but the under-parts (plates 54c and 55 c) are wholly dark brown, streaked with black, though the bases to the primaries are paler brown and the under-tail is also paler, frequently taking on an orange tinge. The white shoulder-patch can occasionally be discerned in the field (plates 54a and 5 5 c), In flight at long range, light-phase Booted Eagles show a conspic- 353 334 Booted Eagle studies uous under-wing pattern of white forewings contrasting with black flight-feathers, not unlike the pattern of an adult Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus (plate 5 8b); despite their differences in shape and structure, I have seen these two species confused more than once. Dark-phase birds can be more easily overlooked, particularly among flocks of Black Kites. To some extent they also resemble brown Marsh Harriers Circus aeruginosus, though the wing position when soaring is quite different: the Booted Eagle holds its wings level, not in the shallow ' V of the harrier. From beneath, both phases show a paler area on the inner primaries and outer secondaries (plate 5 8), but a much more elusive character (just discernible in plates 58a and 5 8d) is the translucent whitish trailing edge to the wings and tail, sometimes visible when overhead in bright sunshine. The wing-beats are deeper and more floppy than those of Buz2ards and are interspersed with glides on level wings. The breeding distribution of the Booted Eagle was described in detail by Vaurie (1965) and Dementiev and Gladkov (1966). In western Europe it is confined to Spain, Portugal, central and north-east France and the Balearic Islands, and in the east to Hungary, Jugo­ slavia, Albania, northern Greece, Bulgaria, Romania and European Russia almost as far north as Moscow. Its range extends along the north coast of Africa from Morocco to Tunisia, and in southern Asia from Turkey, northern Syria and the Caucasus through northern Iran to Afghanistan and north-west India, as well as the Turkmen, southern Uzbek, Tadzhik and Kirghiz Republics north-east to the region of Lake Balkhash. In central eastern Asia it occurs again in the northern Altai Mountains, northern Mongolia, the Sayan Mountains and the Irkutsk region eastwards beyond Lake Baikal to northern Manchuria. Thus this eagle is distributed in three main regions: western Europe and north-west Africa, eastern Europe and southern Asia, and northern Mongolia and the Lake Baikal area. At its broadest the range extends south to 55°N and north to 5 j°N. Systematists differ on the degree of subspeciation involved over this range of 7,000 miles from west to east. Vaurie (1965) treated the species as monotypic, but B. Stegmann (Orn. Monatsber., 43: 151) separated the population of southern Siberia and northern Mongolia as H. p. harterti (with which H. p. milvoides and H. p. albipectus are synonymous). Brown and Amadon (1968) also split the species into two races. Whatever the conclusion, the fact remains that Booted Eagles in the east of the range are longer-winged and migrate to Malaya, Burma and India, while those in the west migrate to north­ east and tropical Africa. There does not appear to be any clear geo­ graphical distribution of the light and dark phases throughout the range (Dementiev and Gladkov 1966), though there is a tendency to find a higher ratio of dark birds in the east. From observations of Booted Eagle studies 335 migrants in Turkey, and in particular at the Bosphorus, it would appear that the Booted Eagles of eastern Europe are largely of the light phase (of the order of 75 %). As with nearly all raptors, the Booted Eagle is decreasing in numbers. In France the population has been estimated at only 30 to 50 pairs and steadily decreasing; in Portugal it is 'scarce' and in Spain 'thinly spread' (I.C.B.P. 1964). At the Bosphorus 260 migrants were counted between 1 ith August and 9th October 1966, and similar totals in 1967, 1968 and 1969; a century ago, however, A. Alleon and J. Vian recorded flocks of several hundreds passing in rapid succession (Porter and Willis 1968). In Russia Dementiev and Gladkov (1966) recorded a decline in the population of the Kharkov region and indicated that changes in habitat were responsible. The breeding areas include deciduous or coniferous woodland from well-forested areas to scattered clumps of trees and from sea-level up to 10,000 feet. The preferred habitat, however, seems to be wooded slopes with open glades and adjacent open or cultivated areas in the foothills of more mountainous regions. Forest clearance throughout Europe and Asia must have had an adverse effect on the population. In addition, the habitual shooting of birds of prey throughout much of their range, particularly in the countries through which they migrate, must have taken a considerable toll. In the three countries of western Europe where Booted Eagles nest—Spain, Portugal and France—the species is not protected. Even if protection were afforded to it, enforcement would be impossible without protection of all other birds of prey, for how many members of the shooting populace could distinguish between, say, a Buzzard and a Booted Eagle? On migration in Europe, Booted Eagles can be most easily observed at the Bosphorus and Gibraltar. Spring migrants start to arrive in late March and the peak generally occurs in the first two weeks of April, though migrants (possibly non-breeding birds) can still be seen on passage in late May. In autumn the peak occurs in the middle weeks of September, and at the Bosphorus it coincides with the peak passage of Lesser Spotted Eagles Aquila pomarina and Buzzards. In both spring and autumn my own observations have been of single birds, or occasi­ onally of groups of up to three. In Europe Booted Eagles start to take up their territories in mid- April. As with most birds of prey, the nuptial display-flights are spectacular and the birds are then extremely vociferous. Booted Eagles which I watched in Istanbul's Forest of Belgrade were far more active and spent longer on the wing than the other nesting raptors of the area. The most frequent display consists of a series of steep undu­ lations with the wings held close to the body. This is performed by both sexes and the position adopted is similar to that in plate 58c, which shows one diving towards its prey, in this case a sparrow 336 Booted Eagle studies Passer sp. Sometimes one of the pair turns on to its back in mid-air and presents upstretched claws to its mate. During these nuptial aerobatics the call I have heard is generally a rather querulous kvee-kvee- kvee, uttered by both birds, though clearly from Dementiev and Gladkov (1966) and Brown and Amadon (1968) there are many variations of this. Both at the breeding grounds and on migration, their great agility and rapid manoeuvrability are seen at their best when being mobbed by or mobbing other birds, particularly raptors, and one gains the distinct impression that Booted Eagles indulge in these aerial forays as much for their own sake as in guarding a territory. When being mobbed, the bird may rapidly gain speed with deep, powerful, wing-beats and then suddenly roll over sideways flinging its talons into the air at its pursuer.
Recommended publications
  • A Multi-Gene Phylogeny of Aquiline Eagles (Aves: Accipitriformes) Reveals Extensive Paraphyly at the Genus Level
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com MOLECULAR SCIENCE•NCE /W\/Q^DIRI DIRECT® PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION ELSEVIER Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35 (2005) 147-164 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multi-gene phylogeny of aquiline eagles (Aves: Accipitriformes) reveals extensive paraphyly at the genus level Andreas J. Helbig'^*, Annett Kocum'^, Ingrid Seibold^, Michael J. Braun^ '^ Institute of Zoology, University of Greifswald, Vogelwarte Hiddensee, D-18565 Kloster, Germany Department of Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Rd., Suitland, MD 20746, USA Received 19 March 2004; revised 21 September 2004 Available online 24 December 2004 Abstract The phylogeny of the tribe Aquilini (eagles with fully feathered tarsi) was investigated using 4.2 kb of DNA sequence of one mito- chondrial (cyt b) and three nuclear loci (RAG-1 coding region, LDH intron 3, and adenylate-kinase intron 5). Phylogenetic signal was highly congruent and complementary between mtDNA and nuclear genes. In addition to single-nucleotide variation, shared deletions in nuclear introns supported one basal and two peripheral clades within the Aquilini. Monophyly of the Aquilini relative to other birds of prey was confirmed. However, all polytypic genera within the tribe, Spizaetus, Aquila, Hieraaetus, turned out to be non-monophyletic. Old World Spizaetus and Stephanoaetus together appear to be the sister group of the rest of the Aquilini. Spiza- stur melanoleucus and Oroaetus isidori axe nested among the New World Spizaetus species and should be merged with that genus. The Old World 'Spizaetus' species should be assigned to the genus Nisaetus (Hodgson, 1836). The sister species of the two spotted eagles (Aquila clanga and Aquila pomarina) is the African Long-crested Eagle (Lophaetus occipitalis).
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Eagle Genus Hieraaetus Is Distinct from Aquila, with Comments on the Name Ayres’ Eagle
    William S. Clark 295 Bull. B.O.C. 2012 132(4) The eagle genus Hieraaetus is distinct from Aquila, with comments on the name Ayres’ Eagle by William S. Clark Received 16 April 2012 Consensus has long existed among taxonomists as to the placement of the species of the eagles in the genera Aquila and Hieraaetus, the only exception being Wahlberg’s Eagle, which has been treated either as A. wahlbergi or H. wahlbergi. However, recent comparisons of DNA sequences of these eagles revealed that both genera were polyphyletic (Helbig et al. 2005, Lerner & Mindell 2005, Griffiths et al. 2007, Haring et al. 2007). To ensure monophyly, these authors recommended that some species be moved into and out of both genera and placed Wahlberg’s Eagle definitely in Hieraaetus. On the other hand, Sangster et al. (2005) recommended that Hieraaetus be subsumed into Aquila, for which they cite eight recent phylogenetic studies, only four of them published in peer-reviewed journals (Roulin & Wink 2004, Bunce et al. 2005, Helbig et al. 2005, Lerner & Mindell 2005); all of which, nevertheless, retained Hieraaetus. Thus, none of the four peer-reviewed journal articles cited by Sangster et al. (2005) to justify placing Hieraaetus into Aquila actually recommended this. Further, Sangster et al. (2005) proposed only that Booted Eagle (pennatus) be included in Aquila, because their recommendations only considered European birds. The generic treatment of Sangster et al. (2005) was followed without comment by Gjershaug et al. (2009) in describing Weiske’s or Pygmy Eagle (weiskei) as a species separate from Little Eagle H.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Peninsula
    THE CONSERVATION STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE BREEDING BIRDS OF THE ARABIAN PENINSULA Compiled by Andy Symes, Joe Taylor, David Mallon, Richard Porter, Chenay Simms and Kevin Budd ARABIAN PENINSULA The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM - Regional Assessment About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with almost 1,300 government and NGO Members and more than 15,000 volunteer experts in 185 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by almost 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org About the Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of around 7,500 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation, and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. About BirdLife International BirdLife International is the world’s largest nature conservation Partnership. BirdLife is widely recognised as the world leader in bird conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Report Colour Morph Does Not Predict Brood Size in the Booted Eagle
    Ornis Fennica 93: 130–136. 2016 Brief report Colour morph does not predict brood size in the Booted Eagle José Enrique Martínez*, José Francisco Calvo, María Victoria Jiménez-Franco, Iñigo Zuberogoitia & Pascual López-López J.E. Martínez, Bonelli’s Eagle Study and Conservation Group, Apdo. 4009, 30080 Murcia, Spain. * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] J.E. Martínez, J.F. Calvo, M.V. Jiménez-Franco, Departamento de Ecología e Hidro- logía. Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain I. Zuberogoitia, Estudios Medioambientales Icarus, S.L. C/ San Vicente, 8. 6ª Planta. Dpto 8. Edificio Albia I, 48001 Bilbao, Spain P. López-López, Terrestrial Vertebrates Group, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, C/ Catedrático José Beltrán 2, E-46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain Received 22 October 2015, accepted 19 February 2016 Mechanisms regulating colour polymorphism remain largely unknown and detailed in- vestigation is required to explore the biological consequences on population dynamics. This paper presents the first study of the possible connection between colour polymor- phism and productivity in a Booted Eagle (Aquila pennata) population breeding in south- eastern Spain. To that end we used 19 years of data of non-marked individuals. A total of 738 pale (91.6%) and 68 dark (8.4%) adult Booted Eagles were observed in our study area, including 57 territories. Our results suggest that colour morph of both sexes re- mained stable in the population over the study period. Although we found a higher num- ber of offspring produced by parents exhibiting the dark morph than those of the pale morph, statistical differences were not significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Eagle
    Species Sheets: Golden Eagle Common name: Golden Eagle Latin Name: Aquila chrysaetos Field Marks: Length 30-40 inches Wing span 80-88 inches photo by Kate Davis © arge raptor with seven-foot wingspan. Dark Nest and eggs: Lbrown overall with golden feathers on back of Large stick nests on cliffs, lined with greenery. In head. Young show white patches in middle of wings some regions nests in trees. Nests may be used year and white at base of tale up until breeding age of 4- after year by mated pair. 1-3 eggs, incubation 41-45 6 years. Adult males have several light bars on tail, days. Often only one chick survives. Fledging 65-80 females one band. “Booted eagle” with feathers days. Young dependant upon adults for several months down to the toes. In flight holds wings in slight afterward. May live up to 38 years in wild. dihedral, versus flatter profile of Bald Eagles. Six subspecies across Northern Hemisphere. Movement: Habitat: Northern birds may migrate into Mexico and Central America. Many remain year-round. Most breeders in Open, often remote country. Mountains, plains, Montana are probably year-round residents. plateaus, deserts with winds and thermals to help hunting abilities. Less successful where thick vegetation and shrubs provide hiding cover for prey Interesting Fact: and obstruct low flight. More than 20,000 Golden Eagles were shot and trapped in the southwest U.S. in the 1950’s and 60’s Behavior: because they were known to kill newborn sheep. With Prey is mostly medium and large mammals. Rabbits, this and the killing of coyotes, the rabbit population hares, ground squirrels, marmots, and young deer increased to numbers that reduced the forage of grass and antelope.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOD of the BOOTED EAGLE &Lpar;<I>HIERAAETUS PENNATUS</I
    FOOD OF THE BOOTED EAGLE (HIERAAETUS PENNATUS) IN CENTRAL SPAIN JoskP. VEIGA ABSTRACT.m The identificationof 202 prey remainsof the BootedEagle (Hieraaetus pennatus) shows that mammals (41.6%of preyitems identified), birds (36.6%) and reptiles(21.8%) are importantprey in CentralSpain. Most mammals capturedwere youngrabbits, and the majorityof the bird prey were fledglingsor juveniles.Lizards were adult or subadultindividuals. Over 90% of the preycaptured weighed between 27 and 243 g. Little is known about the biologyof the Booted but no eagleswere seen in 1981.Visits were made approximately Eagle(Hieraaetus pennatus), as it occursin countries every 15 d from shortlybefore incubation (mid-late April) until after the youngleft the nest(mid-late August). During the feeding with little ornithologicalactivity. Most published periodnests were occasionallyvisited every 7 d. Pelletsand prey accountsof food habitsare singleenumerations of remainswere sought in andaround nests and below perches which prey remainsrecorded mainly during sporadicvis- were usuallywithin a 200 m radiusof the nests. its to nests(Valverde 1967; Arafijo 1973; Garz0n A total of 110 pellets,containing 130 identifiableprey items, 1973;Iribarren ! 975). This procedureprovides an and72 preyremains were collected. Each species found in anyone pelletwas counted as 1 individualunless it waspossible to show inaccuratepicture of diet, sinceprey that are large that more than 1 wasrepresented. Therefore, it wasnecessary to and leave persistentremains are over-represented countpieces of remainssuch as nails, beaks, teeth, etc. Weight and in samples(e.g., Valverde 1967;Delibes 1975). In approximateage of the prey were estimatedby comparingre- spiteof this, severalrecent papers dealing with the mainswith materialfrom zoologicalcollections and with speci- menscollected in the studyareas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Serpent and Hawk Eagle Species, Their
    1 The taxonomy, status and conservation of serpent eagles (Circaetnae) and booted eagles 2 (Aquilinae). 3 4 M.J. McGrady Natural Research Ltd, Banchory, Scotland; L. Kiff Peregrine Fund Boise, Idaho, USA; J. 5 O. Gjershaug Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway; J. Parry-Jones International 6 Centre for Birds of Prey, Newent, England; A. Gamauf Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna, Austria; T. 7 Yamazaki Asian Raptor Research and Conservation Network, Japan 8 9 Abstract Serpent and booted eagles as groups are generally imperilled. Eagles within these groups 10 often have small population sizes, limited distribution (sometimes confined to islands), and occupy 11 habitats (especially tropical forests in Asia and Africa) under threat. In addition, the ecology of many of the 12 species in these groups is not well known and this undermines conservation efforts. As a first step in 13 understanding which species should be made a conservation priority we aimed to assemble the dispersed 14 data on population size and conservation status, main conservation threats and main on-going 15 conservation activities. Because of new taxonomy resulting from recent genetic work, we made some 16 effort to clarify species nomenclature within the context of the main aims of assembling the data. We 17 review information from a variety of sources for 61 eagle species in the (current and historical) genera: 18 Eutriorchis, Spilornis, Pithecophaga, Terathopius, Circaetus, Dryotriorchis, Nisaetus, Stephanoatus, 19 Spizaetus, Hieraaetus, Polemaetus, Lophaetus, Lophotriorchis, Ictinaetus, and Aquila. In reviewing all 20 species in these groups we sought also to identify species where relatively low cost solutions to 21 conservation problems might be applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonelliís Eagle Aquila Fasciata Renschi in the Lesser
    FORKTAIL 29 (2013): 100–106 Bonelli’s Eagle Aquila fasciata renschi in the Lesser Sundas, Wallacea: distribution, taxonomic status, likely origins and conservation status COLIN R. TRAINOR, STEPHEN J. S. DEBUS, JERRY OLSEN, JANETTE A. NORMAN & LES CHRISTIDIS Records of Bonelli’s Eagle Aquila fasciata renschi on 18 islands in the Lesser Sundas, from Lombok to the Tanimbar islands, in Indonesia and Timor-Leste are reviewed, and its taxonomic status examined. The species is resident on many islands, known to breed on several of the larger islands and is most abundant on Flores and Timor. It appears to be rare on Lombok and Sumba. There is minimal genetic differentiation between local subspecies A. f. renschi and nominate A. f. fasciata, suggesting only recent geographic isolation and that it should not be afforded species status. The species may have been introduced to the Lesser Sundas by traders or colonists in the past. The species’s biology and ecology are poorly known in Wallacea. It occurs in a wide range of sites from sea level to about 2,000 m, in wooded habitats with a preference for tropical forest. The sparse data on diet show that it feeds on introduced wild junglefowl Gallus sp., but presumably it also feeds on large-bodied frugivorous pigeons, other birds and small mammals. The two reports of nesting were in May and June–July. The frequency of records on Flores and Timor suggests that these populations are currently secure, but may be threatened by hunting, capture and deforestation. A predator of village chickens, it is likely to be targeted by local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Data Book of European Vertebrates : a Contribution to Action Theme N° 11 of the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy, Final Draft
    Strasbourg, 5 July 2001 T-PVS (2001) 31 [Bern\T-PVS 2001\tpvs31e_2001] English only CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee Preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates Draft for comments - Volume 1 - Joint project between the Council of Europe and the European Environment Agency, based on WCMC draft from 1998. Co-ordinated by the European Topic Centre/Nature Conservation – Paris This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS (2001) 31 - II - Comments should be sent to: European Topic Centre for Nature Protection and Biodiversity MNHN 57 rue Cuvier 75231 PARIS Cedex, France [email protected] - III - T-PVS (2001) 31 About this draft Red List This document is the result of a joint project between the European Environment Agency and the Council of Europe to develop a preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates. It is based on a first draft by WCMC in 1998. Except for Birds (Birdlife International, 1994), no assessment is yet available on the conservation status of Vertebrate species at European level, while Red Books exist at national level in almost all European countries. On the other hand, a global list of threatened species is published and maintained up-dated by IUCN according to well defined criteria (IUCN, 2000). The present assessment is a first attempt to identify the most threatened Vertebrates species at European level, building upon a first analysis of the list of globally threatened species present in Europe (WCMC, 1998) and taking into account the most recent available overviews on European species distribution provided by the various European atlas committees (European Bird Census Council; Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Societas Europea Mammalogica).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Distribution Patterns of Diurnal Raptors in Northeastern Algeria: Seasonal Variation and Some Nesting Characteristics
    Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 39, No. 1, p. 58–71, 2020 DOI:10.2478/eko-2020-0005 POPULATION DYNAMICS AND DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS OF DIURNAL RAPTORS IN NORTHEASTERN ALGERIA: SEASONAL VARIATION AND SOME NESTING CHARACTERISTICS ALI ELAFRI1*, OKBA BOUMAAZA2, MOHAMED DHAYA EL-HAK KHEMIS3, KHIE- REDIN BOUCHERIT2, MOUSSA HOUHAMDI2 1Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Abbés Laghrour, Khenchela, Algeria; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2Laboratoire Biologie, Eau et Environnement (LBEE), Faculté SnV-STU, Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, Algeria; e-mail: [email protected] 3Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Badji Moukhtar, Annaba, Alge- ria; e-mail: [email protected] *Author for correspondence Abstract Elafri A., Boumaaza O., Khemis M.D.E., Boucherit K., Houhamdi M.: Population dynamics and distribution patterns of diurnal raptors in northeastern Algeria: seasonal variation and some nest- ing characteristics. Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 39, No. 1, p. 58–71, 2020. Providing a live data monitoring of raptor abundances and spatial localization of their most important nesting areas is very helpful in building a strong future study and applying a sound strategy for effective safeguarding of these emblematic species. Using geographic information system (GIS) and global positioning system (GPS) techniques, we investigated spatial patterns of raptors distribution in the northeastern areas of Algeria during two consecutive breeding seasons (2014 and 2015). The total area sampled (31,000 km2) host diverse raptor species (14 species), among them, the threatened species Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus; 108 individuals and 19 active nests) and red-footed falcon (Falco vespertinus; 12individuals).
    [Show full text]
  • Bald Eagle.Pdf
    Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Hal Korber/PGC Photo CURRENT STATUS: In Pennsylvania, the bald eagle is threatened and protected under the Game and Wildlife Code. Although not listed as endangered or threatened at the federal level, the bald eagle is pro- tected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Protection Treaty Act. POPULATION TREND: The recovery of the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) has been one of the great wildlife conservation stories in the history of both the state and the nation. Pennsylvania’s nesting bald eagle population has increased steadily and dramatically in recent years. As recently as 1980, the state’s known nesting population numbered only three pairs. In 1990, there were eight active nests, 48 in 2000, and by 2006 the number cleared 100 for the first time since DDT decimated Pennsylvania’s nesting bald eagle population in the 1950s and ‘60s. The increases continued into 2008 when the state’s nesting eagles numbered more than 150 pairs, more than 200 pairs in 2011, and more than 270 pairs in 2013. The exponential increase in Pennsylvania’s nesting bald eagle population is part of a regional in- crease and similar increases are taking place in Chesapeake Bay and New York populations. The bald eagle recovery was fueled by the Game Commission’s eagle reintroduction program from 1983- 89. Conditions were right for the project because population limitations including the harmful effects of pesticides on eagle reproduction, poor stream water quality, the lack of trees along many streams, and, in some cases, direct persecution had subsided by that time.
    [Show full text]