DOCSLIB.ORG

Rifles Regimental Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rifles Regimental Road THE RIFLES CHRONOLOGY 1685-2012 20140117_Rifles_Chronology_1685-2012_Edn2.Docx Copyright 2014 The Rifles Trustees http://riflesmuseum.co.uk/ No reproduction without permission - 2 - CONTENTS 5 Foreword 7 Design 9 The Rifles Representative Battle Honours 13 1685-1756: The Raising of the first Regiments in 1685 to the Reorganisation of the Army 1751-1756 21 1757-1791: The Seven Years War, the American War of Independence and the Affiliation of Regiments to Counties in 1782 31 1792-1815: The French Revolutionary Wars, the Napoleonic Wars and the War of 1812 51 1816-1881: Imperial Expansion, the First Afghan War, the Crimean War, the Indian Mutiny, the Formation of the Volunteer Force and Childers’ Reforms of 1881 81 1882-1913: Imperial Consolidation, the Second Boer War and Haldane’s Reforms 1906-1912 93 1914-1918: The First World War 129 1919-1938: The Inter-War Years and Mechanisation 133 1939-1945: The Second World War 153 1946-1988: The End of Empire and the Cold War 165 1989-2007: Post Cold War Conflict 171 2007 to Date: The Rifles First Years Annex A: The Rifles Family Tree Annex B: The Timeline Map 20140117_Rifles_Chronology_1685-2012_Edn2.Docx Copyright 2014 The Rifles Trustees http://riflesmuseum.co.uk/ No reproduction without permission - 3 - 20140117_Rifles_Chronology_1685-2012_Edn2.Docx Copyright 2014 The Rifles Trustees http://riflesmuseum.co.uk/ No reproduction without permission - 4 - FOREWORD by The Colonel Commandant Lieutenant General Sir Nick Carter KCB CBE DSO The formation of The Rifles in 2007 brought together the histories of the thirty-five antecedent regiments, the four forming regiments, with those of our territorials. Collectively these regiments have given us a remarkable legacy from which we have drawn our modern identity – in terms of ethos, culture and regional affiliation. This historical chronology records the dates of significant events from the origins of the Regiment in 1685 through the Seven Years War, the formation of light troops, the Napoleonic Wars – including the Peninsular War that defined so much of what the Regiment is now about – the wars and skirmishes of Empire, the Crimean War, the Indian Mutiny, the World Wars, the Cold Wars and the post Cold War period. Our forebears fought on every continent and played a role in almost every campaign in which the British Army was engaged. From Argentina to Zululand, from Norway to New Zealand, men from our antecedent regiments fought and died for their country. But it is perhaps the number of Victoria Crosses that highlight the rich variety of our history most clearly, and each and every one of these is recorded in the chronology as an inspiration to every rifleman. It is worth reflecting on the scale of what our antecedent regiments accomplished. By 1862 there were 134,096 rifle volunteers in the United Kingdom; as we look forward to the 100th anniversary of the start of the First World War in which 264 battalions were raised, 90 of which fought in the Battle of the Somme, and almost 100,000 died – every county and city whence we recruit was represented and their sacrifice is remembered with great pride. I take my hat off to Colonel Ted Shields for pulling this together. It is a remarkable piece of work that whilst not exhaustive or completely definitive, brings together for the first time the Regiment’s extraordinarily rich heritage. I commend it to you – it charts the evolution of today’s Regiment and the development of the ethos of innovation and forward thought that is our hallmark. Swift and Bold 20140117_Rifles_Chronology_1685-2012_Edn2.Docx Copyright 2014 The Rifles Trustees http://riflesmuseum.co.uk/ No reproduction without permission - 5 - 20140117_Rifles_Chronology_1685-2012_Edn2.Docx Copyright 2014 The Rifles Trustees http://riflesmuseum.co.uk/ No reproduction without permission - 6 - DESIGN The Rifles Timeline is a chronological list of every significant event in the history of the Regiment. These events are divided into ten discrete periods for ease of reference. An overview introduces each period and is shown in italics. Each entry gives the year (and precise date(s) where known), its location and a brief description of the event. Some entries have warranted greater explanation, most usually because the event or people mentioned are of particular significance. Battle Honours are marked with an asterisk and our representative Battle Honours are highlighted in bold. It should be noted that Battle Honours in the First and Second World Wars were awarded by Regiment, not Battalion. Regimental histories reveal most, but not necessarily all, of the battalions (Regular, Territorial and Service) who were present. Consequently, a few entries record only the name of the regiment and not the individual battalion(s). The British Army has always adapted and changed to best meet the needs of the Nation and its defence. As The Rifles constantly endeavour to be at the forefront of change, so did our predecessors similarly strive. Change has thus always been a constant. This, in part, explains frequent regimental re-titling. To keep things as simple as possible, it was decided to refer to regiments between 1685 and 1751 by the name of their first Colonel rather than to record the changes every time a new Colonel took command. Between 1751 and 1881 the regiments are referred to by the number they were allotted in accordance with the order in which they were raised. For example, the ‘Duke of Beaufort’s Regiment’ describes that regiment, which was to become the Devonshire Regiment, from 1685 until 1751. In 1751 this regiment was numbered the 11th. Although county titles were added in 1782, the Timeline refers to their regimental numbers until 1881 at which time the Cardwell Reforms paired regiments and substituted the numbers with names. For example, the 28th (North Gloucestershire) Regiment and the 61st (South Gloucestershire) Regiment were paired and became the 1st and 2nd Battalions The Gloucestershire Regiment. Abbreviated regimental titles, such as Glosters, R BERKS, SOM LI, KOYLI and KRRC, are used after 1881. Since the late 1950s, there have been a number of changes in name as regiments have amalgamated or have otherwise re-organised. These changes in name are made clear in the Timeline. The Rifles Family Tree at Annex A enables the reader to track the evolution of those regiments who now comprise The Rifles. The Timeline Map at Annex B allows the reader to better visualise our history. Reference material included: • David Ascoli (1983), A Companion to the British Army, Harrap (London). • Anthony Baker (1986), Battle Honours of the British and Commonwealth Armies, Ian Allan Ltd (Shepperton, Surrey). • Alexander Rodger (2003), Battle Honours of the British Empire and Commonwealth Land Forces, The Crowood Press (Marlborough, Wiltshire). 20140117_Rifles_Chronology_1685-2012_Edn2.Docx Copyright 2014 The Rifles Trustees http://riflesmuseum.co.uk/ No reproduction without permission - 7 - • The Rifles Family Tree V3 01/10/09 created by Fostersolutions.co.uk. • Lineage and Battle Honours of London Volunteer Reserve Forces 1908-2008, RFCA for Greater London. • LI Handbook, RHQ LI, Chapter XII. • Various regimental histories held by the Prince Consort’s Library at Aldershot. No work of this scale and in its first iteration can claim to be free from error or omission. Comments on content and format are thus welcome in order to ensure that the next edition can be improved and provide a better resource to riflemen, past and present, as well as to supporters and historians of the Regiment. The Timeline will therefore be revised and updated from time to time. Observations and recommendations should be passed to the Regimental Secretary for consideration by the Heritage Committee. THECompiled RIFLES’ by ColonelREPRESENTATIVE Ted Shields MBE BATTLE on behalf HONOURS of The Rifles Heritage Committee 20140117_Rifles_Chronology_1685-2012_Edn2.Docx Copyright 2014 The Rifles Trustees http://riflesmuseum.co.uk/ No reproduction without permission - 8 - ‘As a rifle regiment, battalions of The Rifles will not carry Colours. Instead, battle honours are entrusted to each Rifleman, who wears a representative selection of battle honours from all the forming regiments on the cross belt or belt badge.’ (The Principles of The Rifles, 11 July 2006). The British infantry of the line have borne their Battle Honours on their Colours since 1784 but, such has been the rifleman’s role on the field of battle, no British (or Commonwealth) rifle regiment has ever carried Colours. A rifle regiment’s Battle Honours – or a representative selection - have thus been displayed on cap and/or belt badges. But it was not just our rifle forebears who chose to display particular Battle Honours on their badges. The cap badge of the 13th Light Infantry (later the Somerset Light Infantry) included a mural crown and the title ‘Jellalabad’ following the award in 1842. The cap badge of Dorsetshire Regiment included the title ‘Marabout’ and the Egyptian Sphinx after that award in 1801. The 66th (Berkshire) Foot displayed their nine Peninsular War Battle Honours on their Officers’ shoulder belt plate from 1829 to 1855. It had previously been agreed that The Rifles’ cap badge would be the bugle horn badge of the Light Infantry surmounted by St Edward's Crown. Representative Battle Honours would thus have to be selected for display on the belt badge only. The task of recommending to The Light Division Council which Battle Honours would best represent the new Regiment on the belt badge fell to the Working Group of Commanding Officers which met in late 2005 and early 2006. The Working Group’s ‘canvas’ was: ‘A wreath of laurel intertwined with a scroll, bearing Battle Honours of the Regiment. Within the wreath, a Maltese Cross. On the divisions further Battle Honours of the Regiment. On the centre of the Cross, a circle inscribed ‘The Rifles’ and ‘Swift and Bold’; within the circle a bugle with strings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Colours Part 1: the Regular Battalions
    The Colours Part 1: The Regular Battalions By Lieutenant General J. P. Riley CB DSO PhD MA FRHistS 1. The Earliest Days At the time of the raising of Lord Herbert’s Regiment in March 1689,i it was usual for a regiment of foot to hold ten Colours. This number corre- sponded to the number of companies in the regiment and to the officers who commanded these companies although the initial establishment of Herbert’s Regiment was only eight companies. We have no record of the issue of any Colours to Herbert’s Regiment – and probably the Colo- nel paid for their manufacture himself as he did for much of the dress and equipment of his regiment. What we do know however is that each Colour was the rallying point for the company in battle and the symbol of its esprit. Colours were large – generally six feet square although no regulation on size yet existed – so that they could easily be seen in the smoke of a 17th Century battlefield for we must remember that before the days of smokeless powder, obscuration was a major factor in battle. So too was the ability of a company to keep its cohesion, deliver effec- tive fire and change formation rapidly either to attack, defend, or repel cavalry. A company was made up of anywhere between sixty and 100 men, with three officers and a varying number of sergeants, corporals and drummers depending on the actual strength. About one-third of the men by this time were armed with the pike, two-thirds with the match- lock musket.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample File Miquelet Ferguson Mfg: Greek 1790 to 1850 Mfg: English 1776 to 1778 .65 Cal .60 Cal Muzzle Velocity: 800 Fps Weight: 13 Lb
    Recoil Action: Firearm action that uses the force of the recoil to provide energy to cycle the action. Roller-delayed Blowback: A type of fi rearm action where rollers on the sides of the bolt are driven inward against a tapered bolt carrier extension. This forces the bolt carrier rearward at a higher velocity and delays movement of the bolt head. Rolling Block Action: A fi rearm action where the breech is seeled with a specially shaped breechblock able to rotate on a pin. The breechblock is locked in place by the hammer preventing the cartridge from moving backwards when fi red. Cocking the weapon allows the breechblock to be rotated to reload the weapon. Short Recoil Action: Action where the barrel and slide recoil together a short distance before they unlock and separate. The barrel stops quickly, and the slide continues rearward, compressing the recoil spring and performing the automated extraction and feeding process. During the last portion of its forward travel, the slide locks into the barrel and pushes the barrel back into battery. Slide Action: A fi rearm action where the handgrip is moved back and forth along the barrel in order to eject a spent cartridge and chamber a new one. This type of action is most common in shotguns and is also used in some rifl e designs. It is also called pump action. Snaphance: A method of fi ring a gun that uses a fl int set in the hammer that when the trigger is pulled causes the fl int to strike the frizzen to create a shower of sparks to ignite the priming powder.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 122 November 2012
    No. 122 November 2012 THE RED HACKLE RAF A4 JULY 2012_Layout 1 01/08/2012 10:06 Page 1 their future starts here Boarding Boys & Girls aged 9 to 18 Scholarship Dates: Sixth Form Saturday 17th November 2012 Junior (P5-S1) Saturday 26th January 2013 Senior (Year 9/S2) Monday 25th – Wednesday 27th February 2013 Forces Discount and Bursaries Available For more information or to register please contact Felicity Legge T: 01738 812546 E: [email protected] www.strathallan.co.uk Forgandenny Perthshire PH2 9EG Strathallan is a Scottish Charity dedicated to education. Charity number SC008903 No. 122 42nd 73rd November 2012 THE RED HACKLE The Chronicle of The Black Watch (Royal Highland Regiment), its successor The Black Watch, 3rd Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland, The Affiliated Regiments and The Black Watch Association The Old Colours of the 1st Battalion The Black Watch and 1st Battalion 51st Highland Volunteers were Laid Up in Perth on 23 June 2012. This was the final military act in the life of both Regiments. NOVEMBER 2012 THE RED HACKLE 1 Contents Editorial ..................................................................................................... 3 Regimental and Battalion News .............................................................. 4 Perth and Kinross The Black Watch Heritage Appeal, The Regimental Museum and Friends of the Black Watch ...................................................................... 8 is proud to be Correspondence .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Sides: Political and Social Divisions in the Niagara Area from 1780 to 1845
    1 Taking sides: political and social divisions in the Niagara area from 1780 to 1845. Sir William Johnson John Johnson It began with Sir William Johnsonʼs favoritism. Johnson came from Ireland to run the large estate of his Uncle, Admiral Warren, in the Mohawk Valley. He was given an army command in the French and Indian War and credited with winning the Battle of Lake George in 1755 and the Battle of Fort Niagara in 1759. He was made Superintendent of Indian Affairs and had many children by Iroquois ladies and some with Europeans. He had his son John and his two daughters by an indentured servant, a German girl; one daughter married his nephew Guy Johnson and the other married Daniel Claus. John Johnson, sent to England to refine him, to wear off the rustic edges of a frontiersman, was made a baronet by King George III who admired his fatherʼs accomplishments. Sir William Johnsonʼs longest attachment was to Molly Brant by whom he had eight children. Mollyʼs brother Joseph, was part of Sir Williamʼs household from time to time and well known to the Johnson clan and to the Butlers. Sir William Johnson, however, depended upon a neighbor in the Mohawk Valley John Butler as an aide in the Indian Department and also in the battles with the French when Butler was his second in command. Butler, the son of the army commander at Fort Hunter where the Mohawk and Schoharie Rivers meet, spoke Indian languages and 2 knew Indian customs well. Of his children, the most famous or notorious to Americans for his escapades in the Revolutionary War was Walter, a charismatic historical figure.
    [Show full text]
  • James Anthony Horne 2Nd Lieutenant, 16 Th Battalion London Regiment (Queen’S Westminster Rifles) !
    ! James Anthony Horne 2nd Lieutenant, 16 th Battalion London Regiment (Queen’s Westminster Rifles) ! James Anthony Horne was born on 3 August 1892 and was baptised on 1 September that year in the Parish Church of St. James, Islington. The ceremony was performed by James’s father the Reverend Joseph White Horne, Vicar of St. James at that time. The family address is given as St. James Vicarage, Islington. In 1901 Joseph became Vicar at St. Mary Magdalene, Monkton, Kent, and the family, by this time including three children, took up residence in the Vicarage there. The Census of that year shows a nurse (domestic), a cook and two housemaids also resident at the Vicarage so the family obviously had plenty of help and lived in some comfort. Their stay in Monkton was fairly short however, and by 1905 they were living at Ivy House, High Street, Highgate, North London, where they were to remain until the outbreak of the war. They moved once more to reside briefly at Chesham Bois, Buckinghamshire, with Joseph by that time being retired, but returned to London, firstly to Highgate and subsequently to Kensington where he was to live out the remainder of his life. James received his secondary school education at Highgate School which he entered in September 1904. He left in July 1910 having been awarded a Choral Exhibition to Christ’s College, Cambridge. He studied there for four years gaining honours in both parts of the Theological Tripos and being awarded his B.A. Degree. As one would expect, he had a fine voice and he regularly performed as a member of a vocal quartet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Battlefield Tours - Anglo Zulu War of 1879
    BATTLEFIELD TOURS - ANGLO ZULU WAR OF 1879 Isandlwana Lodge flagship tours are Isandlwana and Rorke's Drift. All other tours by pre-arrangement, although not essential it would be advisable for groups of 4 or more in order to reduce the cost which quoted in a flat price regardless of number. Battle of Isandlwana, 22 January 1879 Half Day Tour - Rand 300 per person On the 22nd January 1879, the centre column of the British invasionary force, under the command of Lord Chelmsford, was defeated while camped on the eastern slope of the Isandlwana Mountain. 1,329 British and Colonial soldiers died in an attack by King Cetshwayo's Zulu Army. Battle of Rorke's Drift, 22/23 January, 1879 Half Day Tour - Rand 300 per person In the aftermath of Isandlwana an Impi of 4,500 Zulu warriors mounted an assault on a British Garrison of 140 men stationed at the border post at Rorke's Drift. After 11 hours of ferocious fighting, the remnants of the Zulu Impi departed in defeat, leaving 600 dead. 17 British soldiers died. 11 Victoria Crosses and 4 Distinguished Conduct Medals were awarded to the brave men manning the Garrison. Following Lord Chelmsford's Movements Half Day Tour - Rand 300 per person, minimum 4 people. This tour gives the opportunity of following Lord Chelmsford's movements while the famous battle raged at Isandlwana. (A) The Battle of Hlobane, 28th March, 1879 combined with (B) The Battle of Kambula, 29th March 1879 Full Day Tour - Rand 1,500. Maximum 6 people regardless of number (A) Hlobane is a flat-topped mountain 80 kms north of Isandlwana.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS CONFUSION OVER the BATTLES of HLOBANE and KAMBULA in the LONDON and DEVON NEWSPAPERS by Stephen Manning ______
    PRESS CONFUSION OVER THE BATTLES OF HLOBANE AND KAMBULA IN THE LONDON AND DEVON NEWSPAPERS By Stephen Manning ________________________________________________________________________________ After the news of the British defeat at Ntombe Drift, the British press became evidently concerned as to the fate of those troops of Pearson’s command besieged in Eshowe and this appears to have resulted in the papers taking, initially, little notice of the news of Wood’s battles with the Zulus around the Hlobane mountains. Despite the fact that news of a British reversal at Hlobane, followed by a defeat for the Zulus at Khambula, was reported as early as 17 April, nearly a week before news of the relief of Eshowe arrived in England, these events were overshadowed in the press by concerns about the relief of the besieged troops. Although the events of the two battles were reported in the daily papers, editorial comment was still restricted to speculation as to the progress of the relief column under Chelmsford. The timing of the receipt of the news of the relief of Eshowe, on Tuesday 22 April, meant that the majority of the weekly newspapers of Devon, produced between Wednesday and Saturday, concentrated on the events of the relief and the battle of Gingindlovu. Indeed, details of the battles of Hlobane and Khambula did not appear in many Devon weekly papers until two weeks, or more, after they were first reported in the London daily papers. By then, of course, the news of the relief of Eshowe, and other British military successes, overshadowed news of a British reversal.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Islands Great War Study Group
    CHANNEL ISLANDS GREAT WAR STUDY GROUP Lancashire Landing (W Beach) V Beach Ocean Beach, sweeping around towards Suvla Point The Sphinx Ari Burnu (Y Beach) from Walker’s Ridge Brighton Beach and Shell Green Cemetery The Deadly Shores – Gallipoli Today JOURNAL 28 OCTOBER 2009 Please note that Copyright for any articles contained in this Journal rests with the Authors as shown. Please contact them directly if you wish to use their material. 1 Hello All I must confess that for many months up to the time that I boarded my flight took off from Heathrow bound for Istanbul, and to travel from there to the Dardanelles, my feeling was one of considerable apprehension – was I wasting my money, would I learn and see much, would a troublesome knee hold out? Yet, wheezing my way up to Plugge’s Plateau a few days later, that feeling had long since evaporated even though I could now fully understand why the Turkish soldiers had thought that their Australian counterparts worshipped the God “Bastard”! I learnt and saw much, my money was well spent (a common Jersey consideration!), and I made it back safely, albeit in a somewhat worn out and bedraggled state. Gallipoli was a first-rate experience, and I would recommend it and the Holts’ tour company to anyone. Hopefully, I can convey that experience adequately in later pages of this Journal, but trust that I will be forgiven if I don’t, as a few days after my return, my brain is still scrambled and too full of images, impressions and information from the trip to guarantee a decent article.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
    THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error.
    [Show full text]
  • Moments As Chatham Had Been Allowed to Fall Into Disrepair, Almost Devoid of Stores
    The Royals at the Battle of the Medway Royal Scots Museum In 1666 the Regiment was recalled from France, landing at Rye, Sussex it marched to Chatham. At this period the British Navy had been left unmanned, and the defenses of such an important arsenal Moments as Chatham had been allowed to fall into disrepair, almost devoid of stores. In June the Dutch fleet appeared at the mouth of the Thames. in Time An appeal for help was sent by the Governor of Sheerness, and a company of Douglas’s Regiment was dispatched. It manned the weak J u n e defenses, but the batteries were so ill placed that the ships could pour 2 1953 Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. a fierce fire inside them; and any shot which fell short sent showers of 5 1953 1st Battalion sail for Korea. shingle into the faces of the defenders. The post was eventually 6 1761 Dominica captured – 2nd Battalion. abandoned, and the Dutch passed on up the river. They had, 1944 D-Day invasion of Normandy by 1 million however, been delayed twenty-four hours by the gallant defence. Allied troops to liberate Western Europe On the 13th the Dutch prepared for a further move up the Medway. from German occupation - 8th Battalion. At Upnor three great battleships Royal Oak, Royal James and Loyal 7 1762 1st Battalion lands at Havannah to capture it London had been sunk, but only rested on the river bottom. Captain from Spanish possession. Casualties from Douglas and a party from Douglas’s had been sent for duty on board landing through to August 13 number 34 the Royal Oak.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, July 26, 1910
    5400 THE LONDON GAZETTE, JULY 26, 1910. 4th Battalion, The Hampshire Regiment; Neville iQth (County of London) Battalion, The London- Reeks to be Second Lieutenant. Dated 27th Regiment (Paddington Rifles); Captain and May, 1910. Honorary Major Alfred D. Bayliffe to be- Frank Arthur Searle Hinton to be Second Major. Dated 28th June, 1910. Lieutenant. (To be supernumerary.) Dated Lieutenant William R. Walter to be Captain. 8th June, 1910. Dated 28th June, 1910. 6th Battalion, The South Staffordshire Regiment: 18^ (County of London) Battalion, The London George Henry Muras to be Second Lieu- Regiment (London Irish Rifles); Second Lieu- tenant. Dated 8th June, 1910. tenant Augustine ap Ellis to be Lieutenant. Dated 28th June, 1910. 4th Battalion. The Welsh Regiment; Arthur Stanley Williams to be Second Lieutenant. 23rd (County of London) Battalion, The London Dated 18th June, 1910. Regiment; the undermentioned officers are seconded, under the conditions of paragraph 6th (Glamorgan) Battalion, The Welsh Regiment; 114, Territorial Force Regulations:— Lieutenant Charles F. E. Gough to be Captain. Lieutenant Montgomery R.' Harris. Dated Dated 1st March, 1910. 20th November, 1909. oth Battalion, The Sherwood foresters {Notting- Lieutenant Roger J. Cholmeley. Dated 26tit hamshire and Derbyshire Regiment'); Second December, 1909. Lieutenant Frederick W. Wragg to be Lieu- Lieutenant Burton William Eills Getbing,. tenant. Dated 23rd January, 1910. The Northumberland Fusiliers, to be Adjutant, Lieutenant Frederick E. M. Doone to be vice Captain Thomas W. Bullock, The Dorset- Captain. Dated 1st April, 1910. shire Regiment, who vacates that appointment. Second Lieutenant Stewart J. Aldous to be Dated 12th July, 1910. Lieutenant. Dated 1st April, 1910.
    [Show full text]