Attitudes of Women to Fetal Tissue Research

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attitudes of Women to Fetal Tissue Research Journal of medical ethics 1994; 20: 36-40 J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.20.1.36 on 1 March 1994. Downloaded from Attitudes of women to fetal tissue research Fionn Anderson, Anna Glasier, Jonathan Ross and David T Baird Edinburgh Authors' abstract research had been approved by an ethical The use ofhuman fetal tissuefor scientific research has committee. enormous potential but is subject to government In the late 1980s, concerned principally about legislation. In the United Kingdom the Polkinghorne experiments in which human fetal tissue was being Committee's guidelines were accepted by the Department grafted into the brains of patients suffering from ofHealth in 1990. These guidelines set out to protect Parkinsonism, the British government invited a women undergoing termination ofpregnancyfrom second committee, led by the Reverend Dr John exploitation but in so doing may significantly restrict Polkinghorne, to review Peel's guidelines. The potential research. Although the committee took Polkinghorne Committee took advice from organisa- evidence from a wide variety ofexperts they did not seek tions involved in medical research and in the pro- the views ofthe general public. vision of abortion services and also from a significant a We asked 108 women about to have therapeutic number of religious organisations and groupscopyright. abortion; 167 women who had had a pregnancy campaigning against abortion. The recommen- terminated in the past, and 419 women who had never dations of the committee were published in 1989 (3) had an abortion, their views on research using human and accepted by the Department of Health in 1990. fetal tissue. Regardless of their past experiences the One of the principal concerns of the committee women were overwhelmingly in favour of research using and of opponents of fetal tissue research was that fetal tissue (94 per cent). They made little distinction women might be pressurised into terminating a between basic research and research with obvious pregnancy in order to provide fetal material. To http://jme.bmj.com/ clinical relevance and supported the concept ofusing safeguard women from exploitation the new recom- transplantedfetal tissue for the treatment ofadult mendations included a recommendation that disease such as Parkinsonism. Women about to undergo doctors involved in obtaining fetal tissue, ie those an abortion were significantly more likely (p<0 001) to who agreed to a woman's request for abortion or approve ofall types of research including that aimed at who performed the termination - called in the report improving methods of abortion and research using live 'the source' - should be totally separate from doctors fetuses in utero. and scientists carrying out research - 'the user'. Indeed the two parties were specifically prohibited on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected from discussing the proposed research. Women Introduction from whom tissue was obtained should give a The use of human fetal tissue for research purposes general informed consent to the research but should is a subject which arouses strong feelings. Although not be told what the research was about or even there is no doubt that scientific research using fetal whether the tissue was used. tissue has enormous potential, different govern- Although the committee sought the views ofmany ments impose very different restrictions on its use relevant bodies, no attempt was made to seek the (for review see British Medical_Journal (1). In the UK opinions of women of reproductive age and in an advisory group was asked in 1970 'to consider the particular of women about to have a termination of ethical, medical, social and legal implications of pregnancy. using fetuses and fetal material for research'. The In this study we have sought to investigate the resulting Peel Report, published in 1972 (2), attitudes of women to fetal tissue research by a recommended that research should be allowed on questionnaire based on the points brought out in the fetuses weighing less than 300g, provided there was Polkinghorne Report. no objection on the part of the mother and the Subjects and methods Key words Thirty questions were devised to investigate the Attitudes; fetal tissue; research. attitudes of women to a variety of aspects of fetal Fionn Anderson, Anna Glasier, J7onathan Ross, David T Baird 37 J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.20.1.36 on 1 March 1994. Downloaded from tissue research and to the main recommendations of the Chi Square test with Yates correction where the Polkinghome Report. The questionnaire was appropriate (Epi Inf v 5-01a, Public Domain designed to be completed by women while waiting at Software). clinics. Effort was made to simplify the question- naire by providing explanatory paragraphs where appropriate, giving examples of relevant research Results areas. A pilot version of the questionnaire was given DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS to 30 women attending a family planning clinic, The demographic details of the women completing minor modifications were made and a final version the questionnaire are shown in Table 1. Women prepared. attending for termination of pregnancy were younger Two groups of women were selected in an (p<0 001) and more likely to be unmarried attempt to identify differences of opinion that might (p<0 001) while women who had never had a relate to different reproductive experience. Five termination of pregnancy were less likely to have had hundred and twenty-seven consecutive women children (p<0-001) than women in the other two attending a large family-planning clinic in the centre groups. Forty-two per cent of women attending for of Edinburgh (The Dean Terrace Centre) were an abortion had had a previous termination of given the questionnaire, 108 of these women had a pregnancy, while only 13 per cent of women who history of termination of pregnancy while 419 had had an abortion at some time in the past had had women had never had an abortion. A second group more than one. of 167 women attending the Royal Infirmary of Fewer women attending with a request for Edinburgh who were pregnant and requesting ter- abortion were aware of the existence of research mination of pregnancy were also asked to complete using fetal tissue (28 per cent v 53 per cent, the questionnaire. One hundred and fifty-eight p<0o001). women did so; two women were short of time; two said they found the subject too upsetting, while five ATTITUDES TOWARDS FETAL RESEARCH refused to participate as they felt that they held no per cent women Only 6 of said they thought it was copyright. strong views. None of the women were given the unjustifiable to use fetal tissue for research. Of the questionnaire until after the gynaecologist had 94 per cent of women who felt that research was agreed to the request for abortion and the woman justifiable, 88 per cent thought it appropriate to had left the consulting room. The person who asked undertake research aimed at improving our under- the patient to complete the questionnaire was not standing of the basic physiology of the developing involved with the consultation. It was made clear fetus and 84 per cent said they would allow this sort that women were not being asked to participate in of research to be done on their own fetus. All women http://jme.bmj.com/ the sort of research being discussed nor was any part who approved of research agreed with the idea of of their treatment dependent upon their responses to undertaking research into clinical problems affecting the questionnaire. The study and the questionnaire the fetus and neonate, such as investigating the effect both received the approval of the Paediatric/ of giving drugs to accelerate lung maturation in the Reproductive Medicine Ethics of Medical Research event of premature labour. Only 2 per cent of the Sub-committee of the Lothian Health Board. women felt reluctant to allow their own fetus to be The data were entered onto a computerised used for this kind of research. Eighty-seven per cent on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected database (d Base VI v 1 1, Borland software) and of the total sample approved of research which initial analysis performed by summing the answers aimed to improve methods of abortion although for each question and subdividing by group. significantly fewer of the women who had never had Statistical analysis between groups was made using an abortion approved of this kind of research (84 per Table 1 Demographic details of respondents Gynaecological. Outpatient clinic Family planning clinic Attending for abortion History of abortion No abortion Number 158 108 419 % <20 years 20 2 13 /o/ <20-39 years 74 90 82 /o>39 years 6 8 5 % with children 29 28 15 O/o married/cohabiting 28 50 47 % higher education 58 66 68 38 Attitudes ofwomen tofetal tissue research J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.20.1.36 on 1 March 1994. Downloaded from cent v 92 per cent, p<0001). Eighty-seven per cent Practicalities of research of women felt that research aimed towards using Less than half of the women felt that abortions fetal tissue for transplantation was in principle right should be especially timed to allow research to take and 86 per cent of them would allow their own fetus place. However, once again women about to to be used. Overall fewer women felt that research undergo an abortion were more likely to feel this on a live fetus was justifiable but significantly more would be acceptable (41 per cent v 27 per cent, of the women about to undergo termination of p<0-001). Few of the women felt their decision to pregnancy found this idea acceptable (68 per cent allow research on their fetus would be affected if p<0-001) and more than half of them would have either they (8 per cent) or their fetus (7 per cent) had permitted research to be carried out on their own to be tested for HIV infection.
Recommended publications
  • Women's Reproductive Health Across the Life-Course Is Required
    Women’s Reproductive Health across the Lifecourse – Implications for Public Policy Report of a Conference organised by The Royal Society of Edinburgh 27–28 February 2013 Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………..4 Conference Programme…………………………………………..6 Executive Summary……………………………………………….9 Key Messages…………………………………………………....10 Overview…………………………………………………………..12 Day 1………………………………………………………………15 Day 2………………………………………………………………31 Chair & Speaker Biographies…………………………………..49 Rapporteurs: Emma Doyle Sarah Elizabeth Jeavons Emily Ross © The Royal Society of Edinburgh: October 2013 ISBN: 978 0 902198 96 8 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street EDINBURGH EH2 2PQ Tel: 0044 (0)131 240 5000 www.royalsoced.org.uk Opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the view of The Royal Society of Edinburgh, nor its Fellows. 3 The Royal Society of Edinburgh wishes to acknowledge the support of HRA Pharma; Pfizer; The Edinburgh Family Planning Trust; PregLem (educational grant); School of Clinical Sciences, School of Molecular, Genetic and Population Health Sciences, Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, University of Edinburgh 4 and thanks the Organising Committee: Professor Alice Brown CBE FRSE (Then) General Secretary, The Royal Society of Edinburgh Professor John Coggins OBE FRSE Chairman, RSE Scotland Foundation Professor Hilary Critchley FRSE FMedSci Professor of Reproductive Medicine Professor Sarah Cunningham-Burley AcSS Professor
    [Show full text]
  • BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available
    BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029978 on 30 October 2019. Downloaded from BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email [email protected] http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029978 on 30 October 2019. Downloaded from A cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of bridging from emergency to regular contraception: The Bridge–It study protocol For peer review only Journal: BMJ Open Manuscript ID bmjopen-2019-029978 Article Type: Protocol Date Submitted by the 16-Apr-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Cameron, Sharon; University of Edinburgh, Obstetrics and Gynaecology; NHS Lothian, Sexual and Reproductive Health Baraitser, Paula; King's College London School of Medical Education Glasier, Anna; University of Edinburgh McDaid, Lisa; University of Glasgow, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit Norrie, John; Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh No.
    [Show full text]
  • Report IMPOSED
    The Royal S ociety of Edinburgh Reproductive Health Report of a Conference Reproductive Health organised by the © The Royal Society of Edinburgh The Royal Society of Edinburgh and the ISBN 0 902198 24 6 Caledonian Research Foundation November 2004 Thursday 14 & Friday 15 October 2004 Reproductive Health ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS If you would like further information about the work of the RSE The Royal Society of Edinburgh would like to thank the following people and organisations: Please contact The Royal Society of Edinburgh Organising Committee 22-26 George Street Edinburgh Professor David T Baird CBE FRSE EH2 2PQ MRC Clinical Research Professor in Reproductive Endocrinology, Centre for Reproductive Biology, The University of Edinburgh Telephone/Textphone: +44 (0) 131 240 5000 Chairman, Caledonian Research Foundation Fax: +44 (0) 131 240 5024 Email: [email protected] Professor Anna Glasier Director, Family Planning & Well Woman Services, Lothian Primary Care NHS Trust School of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, The University of Edinburgh Department of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine www.royalsoced.org.uk Professor Stephen Hillier Professor of Reproductive Endocrinology Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Edinburgh Scottish Charity No: SC000470 The Caledonian Research Foundation If you would like further information about the work of the CRF www.calres.co.uk Scottish Charity No: SC014705 Reproductive Health: International Conference. 14 - 15 October 2004 Reproductive Health:
    [Show full text]
  • Provision of the Progestogen-Only Pill by Community Pharmacies As Bridging Contraception for Women Receiving Emergency Contraception: the Bridge-It RCT
    Journals Library Health Technology Assessment Volume 25 • Issue 27 • May 2021 ISSN 1366-5278 Provision of the progestogen-only pill by community pharmacies as bridging contraception for women receiving emergency contraception: the Bridge-it RCT Sharon T Cameron, Anna Glasier, Lisa McDaid, Andrew Radley, Susan Patterson, Paula Baraitser, Judith Stephenson, Richard Gilson, Claire Battison, Kathleen Cowle, Thenmalar Vadiveloo, Anne Johnstone, Alessandra Morelli, Beatriz Goulao, Mark Forrest, Alison McDonald and John Norrie DOI 10.3310/hta25270 Provision of the progestogen-only pill by community pharmacies as bridging contraception for women receiving emergency contraception: the Bridge-it RCT Sharon T Cameron ,1,2*AnnaGlasier ,1 Lisa McDaid ,3,4 Andrew Radley ,5,6 Susan Patterson ,4 Paula Baraitser ,7 Judith Stephenson ,8 Richard Gilson ,9 Claire Battison ,10 Kathleen Cowle,11 Thenmalar Vadiveloo ,12 Anne Johnstone ,1 Alessandra Morelli ,7 Beatriz Goulao ,12 Mark Forrest ,12 Alison McDonald 12 and John Norrie 10 1Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK 2Sexual and Reproductive Health, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK 3Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia 4Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK 5Directorate of Public Health, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK 6Division of Cardiovascular Medicines and Diabetes, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK 7Department of Sexual Health, King’s
    [Show full text]
  • BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available
    BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email [email protected] BMJ Open A cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of bridging from emergency to regular contraception: The Bridge–It study protocol For peer review only Journal: BMJ Open Manuscript ID bmjopen-2019-029978 Article Type: Protocol Date Submitted by the 16-Apr-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Cameron, Sharon; University of Edinburgh, Obstetrics and Gynaecology; NHS Lothian, Sexual and Reproductive Health Baraitser, Paula; King's College London School of Medical Education Glasier, Anna; University of Edinburgh McDaid, Lisa; University of Glasgow, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit Norrie, John; Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh No.
    [Show full text]
  • Provision of the Progestogen-Only Pill by Community Pharmacies As
    University of Dundee Provision of the progestogen-only pill by community pharmacies as bridging contraception for women receiving emergency contraception Cameron, Sharon T.; Glasier, Anna; McDaid, Lisa; Radley, Andrew; Patterson, Susan; Baraitser, Paula Published in: Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) DOI: 10.3310/hta25270 Publication date: 2021 Licence: UK Government Non-Commercial Licence Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Cameron, S. T., Glasier, A., McDaid, L., Radley, A., Patterson, S., Baraitser, P., Stephenson, J., Gilson, R., Battison, C., Cowle, K., Vadiveloo, T., Johnstone, A., Morelli, A., Goulao, B., Forrest, M., McDonald, A., & Norrie, J. (2021). Provision of the progestogen-only pill by community pharmacies as bridging contraception for women receiving emergency contraception: the Bridge-it RCT. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 25(27), 1-120. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta25270 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Dewhurst's Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, EIGHTH EDITION
    Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology This book is dedicated to my wife, Gill, and my children, Alastair, Nicholas and Timothy, and to the memory of Sir Jack Dewhurst. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology EDITED BY D. KEITH EDMONDS FRCOG, RRACOG Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Queen Charlotte’s & Chelsea Hospital London, UK EIGHTH EDITION A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication This edition first published 2012 © 2007, 1999, 1995, 1986, 1981, 1976 Blackwell Science; 1972 Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Wiley-Blackwell is an imprint of John Wiley & Sons, formed by the merger of Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical and Medical business with Blackwell Publishing. Registered office: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial offices: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Effective Contraception Following Provision of The
    University of Dundee Use of effective contraception following provision of the progestogen-only pill for women presenting to community pharmacies for emergency contraception (Bridge-It) Cameron, Sharon T.; Glasier, Anna; McDaid, Lisa M.; Radley, Andrew; Baraitser, Paula; Stephenson, Judith M. Published in: Lancet DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31785-2 Publication date: 2020 Licence: CC BY Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Cameron, S. T., Glasier, A., McDaid, L. M., Radley, A., Baraitser, P., Stephenson, J. M., Gilson, R., Battison, C., Cowle, K., Forrest, M., Goulao, B., Johnstone, A., Morelli, A., Patterson, S., McDonald, A., Vadiveloo, T., & Norrie, J. D. T. (2020). Use of effective contraception following provision of the progestogen-only pill for women presenting to community pharmacies for emergency contraception (Bridge-It): a pragmatic cluster-randomised crossover trial. Lancet, 396(10262), 1585-1594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31785-2 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]