A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Environmental Statement

Appendix 15.1 APPROACH TO SCREENING DEVELOPMENT FOR POTENTIAL CUMULATIVE EFFECTS

Developing a ‘long-list of potentially relevant other developments 15.1A.3 In addition, the local authorities, Natural and the Environment Agency were invited to comment on the cumulative effects methodology as a matter of 15.1A.1 A ‘long list’ of potentially relevant other developments was developed, built up in good practice. line with the criteria set out in Table 15.1 and taking into account the following additional factors: Sifting the long list to identify a ‘short list’ of other developments for  Any transport infrastructure or other development on the ‘traffic uncertainty assessment log’65 that was deemed sufficiently certain to be included in the ‘core scenario’ 15.1A.4 A proportion of the developments were not suitable for inclusion in the cumulative for traffic modelling were included in the long list. effects assessment, either because:  Applications under other regimes were limited to ‘major applications’ within the  There was too much uncertainty about the project going ahead, and therefore of relevant local authorities (, , and its impacts occurring, to justify its inclusion in the assessment; or ) as defined in the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2010 (TCPO). ‘Major applications’  There was too little information available about the project, and in particular its include: environmental effects, to allow an assessment.  Employment proposals of 1000m2 or more; 15.1A.5 Therefore, the ‘short list’ of developments that may act cumulatively with the A19/A184 Testos Junction Improvement scheme for inclusion in the assessment  Residential proposals with 10 or more houses or, where the number of was determined by taking into account the following factors: houses is not known, a site area of 0.5 hectares or more;  How certain it is that each development will go ahead;  Minerals or waste sites with an area of 1 hectare or more; or  The availability of environmental information regarding the developments;  Transport infrastructure proposals with an area of 1 hectare or more.  Potential temporal overlap between any of the effects of the Scheme and the  Any other relevant developments identified through consultation with effects of other developments; and developers and stakeholders.  Potential spatial overlap between any of the effects of the Scheme and the 15.1A.2 The following stakeholders were consulted during the consultation process to effects of the other developments. ensure that all relevant developments were taken into consideration: 15.1A.6 Consideration of whether there is sufficient certainty of a project going ahead was  South Tyneside Council; based on the ‘tiers’ identified in Table 15.1, as follows:  Sunderland City Council;  Any Tier 1 and Tier 2 project deemed to have sufficient certainty was taken into  North Tyneside Council; the short list, providing other criteria were met (see paragraph 15.1A.5);  Gateshead Council;  For Tier 3 projects, there was variation in the level of confidence that a project would go ahead. Some individual projects have public commitments with a  Sunderland City Council Highways Department; defined timescale and identified funding, while others remain policy or  South Tyneside Council Highways Department; commercial aspirations. These projects were considered on a case-by-case basis to determine whether there was sufficient confidence to carry them  Nexus (formerly Passenger Transport Executive); forward into the short list, taking other criteria into account.  North-East Combined Authority (formerly Tyne and Wear Integrated Transport 15.1A.7 Cumulative impact assessment cannot be undertaken unless there is sufficient Authority); information about the other developments included. As a minimum, this must  Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limited; include an environmental Scoping Report or other environmental report that enables:  National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc; and  Identification of the environmental zone of influence of the other project, overall  National Grid Plc. and on a topic-by-topic basis; and

 Identification of the time period over which the impacts of the other project 65 The traffic uncertainty log is a similar ‘long list’ process used by traffic modellers to identify other planned could occur. developments that may influence the quantity, speed or distribution of traffic. 15.1A.8 Projects with sufficient confidence were placed on the short list.

A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Environmental Statement

Gathering information on the projects in the short list 15.1A.9 The following categories of information were sought for each of the developments included on the short list of developments for assessment, to inform the cumulative effects assessment:

 The location and extent of the other development;

 Information on the design of the other development;

 Its proposed programme for obtaining consent (if relevant), construction,

operation and decommissioning;

 Environmental assessment information that wouldl allow the identification of:

 The environmental baseline;

 The environmental effects of the development;

 The environmental zone of influence of the development as a whole and on a topic by topic basis; and  The timescale on which effects would occur, overall and on a topic by topic basis. 15.1A.10 It was recognised that the extent to which this information is available, and the level of detail of the information, is likely to vary between developments, even where the

minimum requirement for inclusion in the short list has been met.

15.1A.11 The starting point for data gathering was websites of the relevant competent authorities (i.e. the local authorities and the Planning Inspectorate). Where required, we supplemented by liaising with the competent authorities and consulting other stakeholders and statutory bodies. In some cases, information was available from the developers themselves, from their websites or directly.

A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Environmental Statement

Appendix 15.2 SHORT-LISTED DEVELOPMENTS

ID1: Land north of Nissan Agricultural Land, west of the A19, east of  A road bridge across the A19 to connect with Washington Road; A1290 and north of Washington Road (also known as ‘Wearpoint 55’)  Other associated ancillary uses (including a public transport interchange, retail, 15.2A.1 A proposed industrial/commercial development adjacent to the A19, located between leisure and a hotel, known as ‘the Hub’); and the Nissan plant and Downhill Lane junction. An application for planning consent, with  Utilities provision with the potential provision of an energy centre, and electricity an ES, has been submitted to Sunderland City Council. Full planning permission was sub-station upgrades. sought to build two manufacturing warehouses (Unit A 27,870 sqm and Unit B 46,451 sqm) plus associated car parking and access from the A1290. Outline planning 15.2A.8 Environmental information for the IAMP site is available from an EIA Scoping Report permission was included for a third manufacturing warehouse (Unit C 28,863 sqm) and published on the Planning Inspectorate website, and from ecological survey reports 8,805 sqm of commercial development comprising a Hotel (use class C1), Retail (use that have been shared with Highways England. There has also been extensive liaison class A1) and Car Showroom (use class Sui Generis). between Highways England and the developers of IAMP and their respective environmental teams. 15.2A.2 It is important to note that Wearpoint 55 and IAMP (see short list site ID3) cannot both proceed without modification as the entirety of Wearpoint 55 would occupy some of ID4: Site of Former Industrial Units Bedewell Industrial Park/Baker the same land proposed for IAMP. Perkins Sports Ground, Red House Road ID2: Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) Limited Washington Road, 15.2A.9 Consented housing development for 335 new residential dwellings and associated Usworth access, landscaping and engineering works. 15.2A.3 Construction of new link road between an existing supplier site and the main Nissan ID5: Land in bounded by Eskdale Drive, Coniston Drive, site. Lodore Grove, Kirkstone Avenue and Grasmere Avenue ID3: International Advanced Manufacturing Park (IAMP), Washington 15.2A.10 Planning application for construction of 36 new residential dwellings comprising a mix Road, Usworth of 1 to 3 bedroom: flats, bungalows, semi-detached and terraced properties. Would include new boundary treatments, landscaping, parking and associated access. 15.2A.4 An IAMP is proposed immediately south-west of Testos junction, south and west of Downhill Lane junction. The IAMP is a joint venture between Sunderland and South ID6: Housing development adjacent to east side of A19, north-west Tyneside Council to develop an employment site for advanced manufacturing that of Simonside would attract both national and international business investment and job creation. The site is predicted to generate £295 million of private sector investment and 5,200 new 15.2A.11 Planning application for construction of 20 new residential dwellings comprising 6 jobs by 2026/ 27. apartments, 10 bungalows and 4 houses, plus associated parking, landscaping and highways improvements. 15.2A.5 The IAMP site would be developed on an area that is currently in the Green Belt. Sunderland and South Tyneside Councils have been consulting the local community ID7: Land in Jarrow adjacent to Friar Way/Saxon Way and High on changes to their local plans required to remove the relevant area from the Green Belt. Street/Stanley Street 15.2A.6 The IAMP project is being pursued as a commercial Nationally Significant 15.2A.12 Consented development under construction for 55 new residential dwellings: 29 units Infrastructure Project, and the Secretary of State gave a direction authorising it to be at Friar Way / Saxon Way (comprising 17 two bedroom houses, 10 three bedroom considered for consent under the Planning Act 2008 on 15th September 2015. An houses and 2 one bedroom) and 26 units at High Street / Stanley Street (comprising application for development consent is expected during 2017. 16 two bedroom houses, 2 two bedroom bungalows and 8 one bedroom). Associated 2 infrastructure works includes new vehicle access/egress points and new boundary 15.2A.7 IAMP would provide up to 260,000m of floor space, whilst a further 50ha will remain treatments. safeguarded land for future development as demand for floor space and services increases. In addition to the development of the floor space, the development would ID8: Land in north of Blue Sky Way and Apollo Court include: Koppers Way  Internal access roads and footways; 15.2A.13 Planning application for construction of three B1, B2, B8 industrial units split across  Landscaped areas; two buildings with ancillary car parking, landscaping and service yards.  Ecological and landscape mitigation area, surrounding the River Don, Bridge across the River Don;

A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Environmental Statement

ID9: 1 to 11 George Court and Former Wilfred Street Day Care Centre, in Boldon Colliery 15.2A.14 Consented development comprising demolition of existing redundant day centre and construction of 11 residential dwellings with associated road, car parking and landscaping. ID10: Land in Boldon Colliery, west of Cotswold Lane and north of Hutton Street 15.2A.15 Consented development for construction of 33 residential dwellings with associated landscape/boundary treatments and creation of new access to Cotswold Lane.

A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Environmental Statement

Appendix 15.3 LONG LIST OF DEVELOPMENTS

A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Environmental Statement

Environmental Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Development Plan (full Planning Allocation Policy Development Plan Number of Housing Development Site Boundary Map Long List ID Location Development Description Application or Allocation Development Type Local Planning Authority Planning Application Status (see look up) Development Plan Date Predominant Use Class Site Area (ha) Assessment Traffic Assessment Available Reference Submission Date Decision Date document title) Ref Status (see look up) Units Certainty (see look up) (Yes/No) Available

Hybrid planning application comprising: Full planning permission for the erection of 2no manufacturing warehouse (Unit A 27,870 sqm and Unit B 46,451 sqm) (use class B2), associated car parking, SuDs, detail access from A1290, internal road structure and footpaths, turning circles, utilities Land North Of Nissan Agricultural Land West Of The A19, East Of A1290 And provision and associated landscaping. 1 Application Employment Sunderland City Council 16/01341/HE4 21/07/2016 N/A Consented Site N/A N/A N/A N/A B2 and B8 N/A 22.20 ha Highly Likely Yes Yes Yes North Of Washington Road, Sunderland SR5 3HX SR5 3HU Outline planning permission for the erection of 1no manufacturing warehouse (Unit C 28,863 sqm) (use class B2 and/or B8) and 8,805 sqm of commercial development comprising of a Hotel (use class C1), Retail (use class A1) and Car Showroom (use class Sui Generis), including details of access, infrastructure, car parking, SUDS provision and associated landscaping. Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) Limited Washington Road Usworth Transport 2 Sunderland SR5 3NS Construction of new link road between an existing supplier site and the main Nissan site. Application Sunderland City Council 16/01238/FUL 11/07/2016 07/10/2016 Consented Site N/A N/A N/A N/A Sui Generis N/A 2.2 ha Highly Likely Yes Yes Yes Infrastructure Unit 2 Sunrise Enterprise Park Sunderland SR5 3RX Change of use from children's play centre into a distribution warehouse with ancillary offices and trade counter (Use 3 Application Employment Sunderland City Council 15/00160/FUL 29/01/2015 27/03/2015 Under Construction N/A N/A N/A N/A B8 N/A 5,500 sq. m Certain Yes No No Class B8).

Infrastructure Advanced Manufacturing Park (IAMP) will provide up to 260,000m2 of floor space. A further 50ha will remain as safeguarded land for development in the future as demand for floor space and services increases. In addition to the development of the floor space indicated the development will include: - Internal access roads and footways; National Strategic - Landscaped areas; Infrastructure Sunderland City Council and 4 IAMP Washington Road Usworth Sunderland - Ecological and landscape mitigation area, surrounding the River Don, Bridge across the River Don; Application 16/01543/SCO 27/09/2016 N/A Pre-Application Submission N/A N/A N/A N/A B1, B2 and B8 N/A 26 ha Probable Yes (within Scoping Report) Yes No Project South Tyneside Council - A road bridge across the A19 to connect with Washington Road; (Employment) - Other associated ancillary uses (including a public transport interchange, retail, leisure and a hotel, known as ‘the Hub’); and - Utilities provision with the potential provision of an energy centre, and electricity sub-station upgrades.

Other anticipated enabling infrastructure is likely to be produced which can be found within the Scoping Report on the link.

Site of Former Industrial Units Bedewell Industrial Park/Baker Perkins Sports Ground, Red House Road and Car Park Opposite 81-103 Red House Road 5 Hebburn 1-135 (odd) and 2-98 (even) Adair Way, 2-26 (even) Red House Erection of 335 residential dwellings (Use Class C3) and associated access, landscaping and engineering works. Application Housing South Tyneside Council ST/0539/15/FUL 22/06/2015 17/05/2016 Consented Site N/A N/A N/A N/A C3 335 09.10 ha Highly Likely Yes Yes Yes Road, Portrush Drive, Troon Walk, Turnberry Drive, Wentworth Close

Land either side of Monkton Lane / Lukes Lane (Known locally as Monkton Fell) Hebburn NE31 2HB Phase 2: Bruce Drive/Gresford Application for the approval of reserved matters for the residential development of the site comprising 291 No. Close/Holmes Drive/1-9 (odd & even) Lukes Lane/ 60-76 (odd & even) dwellings and associated works. Details of layout, scale, appearance and landscaping submitted for consideration 6 Application Housing South Tyneside Council ST/0461/15/RES 01/06/2015 28/09/2015 Consented Site N/A N/A N/A N/A C3 291 12.2 ha Highly Likely Yes Yes No Monkton Lane/Penrose Place/Saint Close/Victoria Walk/Wollaston (outline consent with all matters reserved except access under reference ST/0947/12/FUL) Way

Construction of 36no. dwellings (comprising a mix of 1-3 bedroom: flats, bungalows, semi-detached and terraced properties), Land bounded by Eskdale Drive, Coniston Drive,Lodore Grove, Kirkstone 7 new boundary treatments, landscaping, parking and associated access. Application Housing South Tyneside Council ST/0114/17/LAA 22/03/2017 N/A Planning Application N/A N/A N/A N/A C3 36 0.70 ha Probable Yes Yes Yes Avenue and Grasmere Avenue Jarrow Erection of 20no. new dwellings comprising 6 apartments, 10 bungalows and 4 houses including associated parking, landscaping 8 ….. and highways improvements. Application Housing South Tyneside Council ST/1258/16/LAA 08/03/2017 N/A Planning Application N/A N/A N/A N/A C3 20 0.466 ha Probable Yes No Yes

Retrospective application for construction of new warehouse/training 9 Quay Corner Training Centre Church Bank Jarrow NE32 3HH Application Employment South Tyneside Council ST/1247/16/FUL 08/02/2017 N/A Planning Application N/A N/A N/A N/A B1 and B8 N/A 0.3 ha Probable Yes No No

Extension of Jarrow Brewery to provide cold store and additional micro brewery with ancillary education room, display area and bar area for local heritage display and brewery tours. New internal storage area to first floor with 10 Unit 54A Aidan Court Jarrow NE32 3EF Application Employment South Tyneside Council ST/0925/14/FUL 06/10/2014 26/11/2014 Under Construction N/A N/A N/A N/A B8 N/A 0.2078 ha Certain Yes No No external windows. Erection of 2.4m high fencing and gates.

11 Site of Former The Allison Arms Public House Straker Street Jarrow Change of use of land for the sale of cars and erection of a car sales modular Application Employment South Tyneside Council ST/0300/14/FUL 16/07/2014 08/08/2014 Complete N/A N/A N/A N/A B1 N/A 0.15 ha Certain Yes No No

Expedient Training Services Ltd. Quay Corner Training Centre Church Proposed demolition of existing single storey office building and construction of a two storey office/training 12 Application Employment South Tyneside Council ST/0261/14/FUL 19/05/2014 04/08/2014 Under Construction N/A N/A N/A N/A B1 and B2 N/A 0.2338 ha Certain Yes No No Bank Jarrow NE32 3HH building, including an industrial unit for plant operative training

The demolition of existing buildings and re-development of adjacent open space comprising the erection of an 1-47 Joseph Collins House North Street Jarrow Formerly Tunnel Club 13 apartment block (part two storey / part four storey) to provide 48 affordable housing units for the over 55's with Application Housing South Tyneside Council ST/1049/14/FUL 07/11/2014 02/04/2015 Consented Site N/A N/A N/A N/A Sui Generis 48 00.27 ha Highly Likely Yes No No & Open Space to the East North Street Jarrow NE32 3PG associated access, parking, landscaping and boundary treatments.

Proposed construction of 55 new dwellings: 29 units at Friar Way / Saxon Way comprising 17 two bedroom houses, 10 three Land adjacent to two sites Friar Way/Saxon Way and High Street/Stanley bedroom houses and 2 one bedroom "Tyneside" apartments and 26 units at High Street / Stanley Street comprising 16 two 14 Street Jarrow 10-66 (even) Friar Way 109, 111, 250-274 (even) High Street 1- bedroom houses, 2 two bedroom bungalows and 8 one bedroom "Tyneside" flats. Associated infrastructure works including new Application Housing South Tyneside Council ST/0721/13/LAA 30/09/2013 23/12/2013 Under Construction/Complete N/A N/A N/A N/A Sui Generis and C3 55 00.92 ha Certain Yes Yes Yes 23 (odd) Stanley Street vehicle access/egress points and new boundary treatments

Construction of 3 no. B1, B2, B8 industrial units split across 2 no. buildings with ancillary car parking, landscaping and service 15 Land North of Blue Sky Way and Apollo Court Koppers Way Hebburn Application Employment South Tyneside Council ST/0169/17/FUL 08-03-2017 Not yet Determined Planning Application Submitted N/A N/A N/A N/A B1/B2/B8 N/A 0.5352ha Probable Yes Yes Yes yards. Change of use of vacant Police Station to mixed use - ground floor storage/distribution (Use Class B8), first and 16 North Road Boldon Colliery NE35 9AF Application Employment South Tyneside Council ST/1249/16/FUL 23/02/2017 16/03/2017 Planning Permission (yet to be implemented) N/A N/A N/A N/A B1/B8 N/A 0.15ha Probable Yes No No second floors to office (Use Class B1) 1 to 11 George Court Boldon Colliery Former Wilfred Street Day Care Centre Demolition of existing redundant day centre and construction of 11no. residential housing dwellings with associated road, car 17 Application Residential South Tyneside Council ST/0006/15/FUL 22/01/2015 02/03/2016 Planning Permission (under construction) N/A N/A N/A N/A C3 11 N/A Certain Yes Yes No Wilfred Street Boldon Colliery NE35 9DL parking and landscaping. Land West of Cotswold Lane and North of Hutton Street Boldon Colliery Now Proposed construction of 33no. residential dwelling houses with associated landscape/boundary treatments and creation of new 18 Application Residential South Tyneside Council ST/0969/13/FUL 11/09/2013 03/03/2014 Planning Permission (under construction) N/A N/A N/A N/A C3 33 N/A Certain Yes Yes Yes 1-34 Colliery Mews (exc 13) access to highway (Cotswold Lane). SA9(Axxvii): Balgownie Site-Specific Allocations House & Suffolk St Local Development 19 Balgownie House & Suffolk St Registry Office, Bede Burn Road Part of the 2,581 housing completions by 2016 Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 C3 approx. 10. N/A Likely Yes No No Registry Office, Bede Plan - Adopted Document Burn Road

Site-Specific Allocations Local Development 20 Land at Boldon Business Park, Brooklands Way, Boldon Colliery Priority Sites under 2 hectares (by 2016): Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA3(Cx) B1,B2,B8 N/A 0.2 ha Likely Yes No No Plan - Adopted Document Site-Specific Allocations Local Development 21 Land west of 16 Brooklands Way, Boldon Business Park Priority Sites under 2 hectares (by 2016): Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA3(Cxi) B1,B2,B9 N/A 0.8ha Likely Yes No No Plan - Adopted Document Site-Specific Allocations Charles Street / John Street, Boldon Colliery – demolition of 59 properties and the Local Development 80 dwellings (21 net 22 Charles Street / John Street, Boldon Colliery Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA8(B) C3 N/A Likely Yes No No construction of 80 new homes Plan - Adopted increase) Document Site-Specific Allocations Local Development 23 Cotswold Lane / Hutton Street Cotswold Lane / Hutton Street, Boldon Colliery (approx. 1.1ha) Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA3(Cix) B1,B2,B9 0 1.1ha Likely Yes No No Plan - Adopted Document Site-Specific Allocations Local Development 24 Blue Sky Way (Phase 2) Blue Sky Way (Phase 2), Monkton Business Park South, Hebburn (approx. 0.7ha) Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA3(Cxiv) B1 0 0.7 Likely Yes No No Plan - Adopted Document Site-Specific Allocations Local Development 25 Land west of 16 Brooklands Way Land west of 16 Brooklands Way, Boldon Business Park (approx. 0.8ha) Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA3(Cxi) B1,B2,B8 0 0.8 Likely Yes No No Plan - Adopted Document Site-Specific Allocations Local Development 26 Land at Leam Lane/Lukes Lane Land at Leam Lane/Lukes Lane, Monkton Fell (south), Hebburn (approx. 4.0ha) Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA3(Dii) B1,B2,B8 0 4.0 Likely Yes No No Plan - Adopted Document Site-Specific Allocations 2016-2021 priority sites [Sub-total = approx. 1,152 net additional dwellings]: within the South Local Development 27 Land at Monkton Fell (central), Hebburn Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA9(Bxii) C3 330 0.0 Likely Yes No No Shields/Urban Fringe Housing Market Area [Sub-total = approx. 380 net additional dwellings]: Plan - Adopted Document Site-Specific Allocations Local Development 28 Land at Monkton Fell Land at Monkton Fell (north), Hebburn Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Development Plan April 2012 SA9(Axxxviii) C3 170 0.0 Likely Yes No No Plan - Adopted Document The creation of sustainable communities in the Central Jarrow area will be promoted by the development of key strategic regeneration sites for a mix of uses where appropriate, giving priority to the most accessible and Central Jarrow Area Action Local Development 29 land at Mercantile wharves, Priory Road / Curlew Road Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-10 J2(Bi) B2, B8 0 7.6 Likely Yes No No sustainable sites within the town centre. (Riverside Area) Plan Plan - Adopted

allocating the following priority and reserve sites for high quality office-based Central Jarrow Area Action Local Development 30 Grange Road / Monkton Road business, commercial and industrial developments (Use Classes as specified), where Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-10 J4(Bii) (B1(a,b)) Likely Yes No No Plan Plan - Adopted appropriate as part of a mixed-use development scheme The creation of sustainable communities in the Central Jarrow area will be promoted by the Central Jarrow Area Action Local Development 31 land at Quay Corner, Priory Road / High Street ( development of key strategic regeneration sites for a mix of uses where appropriate, giving Allocation Mixed use South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-10 J2(Ci) (B1, B2, C1, D1 0 1.0 Likely Yes No No Plan Plan - Adopted priority to the most accessible and sustainable sites within the town centre. We will promote the provision of a sustainable mix and choice of housing in the Central Jarrow area that meets the needs of everyone. Improvements to the quality of residential Central Jarrow Area Action Local Development 32 site of St. Bede’s RC Primary School areas in the town will be encouraged, including proposals for the restoration of existing Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-10 J9(iv) C3 30 0.0 Likely Yes No No Plan Plan - Adopted properties, bringing upper floors of premises back into viable use, and the reclamation and regeneration of disused sites. We will promote the provision of a sustainable mix and choice of housing in the Central Jarrow area that meets the needs of everyone. Improvements to the quality of residential Central Jarrow Area Action Local Development 33 land at Friar Way areas in the town will be encouraged, including proposals for the restoration of existing Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-10 J9(Bi) C3 30 0.0 Likely Yes No No Plan Plan - Adopted properties, bringing upper floors of premises back into viable use, and the reclamation and regeneration of disused sites. We will promote the provision of a sustainable mix and choice of housing in the Central Jarrow area that meets the needs of everyone. Improvements to the quality of residential areas in the town will be encouraged, including Central Jarrow Area Action Local Development 34 land at High Street / Stanley Street Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-10 J9(Bii) C3 10 0.0 Likely Yes No No proposals for the restoration of existing properties, bringing upper floors of premises back into viable use, and the Plan Plan - Adopted reclamation and regeneration of disused sites. South Tyneside Strategic Land to North of Town End Farm, Boston Crescent / Boston Street, Residential / 35 South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 BC18 SHLAA/ELA Site C3/B1/B2/B8 221 3.9 Very Low Yes No No Sunderland Mixed

South Tyneside Strategic Residential / 36 Land to the west of Boldon Business Park, West Boldon South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 FG18 SHLAA/ELA Site C3/B1/B2/B8 756 13.4 Very Low Yes No No Mixed

South Tyneside Strategic 37 Land west of 16 Brooklands Way, Boldon Business Park South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: GREEN- Site considered suitable Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 BC9 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B8 0 0.3 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 38 Land north of Brooklands Way, Boldon Business Park South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: GREEN- Site considered suitable Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 BC8 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B8 0 0.2 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 39 Land to North and East of Holland Park Drive, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 FG3 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 22 0.0 Very Low Yes No No South Tyneside Strategic 40 Land at Perth Green Community Centre, Inverness Road, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA33 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 69 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic Land at Bedes Children Centre and playing fields, Inverness Road, 41 South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA34 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 72 0.0 Very Low Yes No No Jarrow

South Tyneside Strategic 42 Land to north of Kirkstone Avenue / east of Coniston Drive, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA36 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 12 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 43 Land at Leamside, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA43 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 74 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 44 Land at Calf Close Walk, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 FG26 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 61 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic Residential / 45 Land at Monkton Fell, Lukes Lane / Leam Lane, Hebburn South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: GREEN- Site considered suitable Allocation South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 FG9 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 168 1.7 Very Low Yes No No Mixed

South Tyneside Strategic 46 Blue Sky Way (Phase 2), Monkton Business Park South, Hebburn South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: GREEN- Site considered suitable Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 FG11 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B8 0 0.4 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 47 Land at former Wardley Colliery disposal point and spoil tip, Wardley South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Employment South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 FG22 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B8 0 24.5 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 48 arge open grassed space, Stanhope Road, South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA27 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 22 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 49 Land at Salcome Avenue, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA21 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 32 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic Residential / 50 Land at Rohm and Haas, Ellison Street, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: GREEN- Site considered suitable Allocation South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA38 SHLAA/ELA Site C3/B1/B2/B8 408 5.4 Very Low Yes No No Employment

South Tyneside Strategic 51 Land at Friar Way, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: GREEN- Site considered suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA12 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 29 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 52 Large open grassed space, Saxon Way, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA11 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 32 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic 53 Land at High Street/Stanley Street, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: GREEN- Site considered suitable Allocation Residential South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA13 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 26 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

South Tyneside Strategic Residential / 54 Large open grassed space, west of Priory Road, Jarrow South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA10 SHLAA/ELA Site C3/B1/B2/B8 18 0.2 Very Low Yes No No Employment

South Tyneside Strategic Land at Shell UK, adjacent businesses and railhead, Priory Road / Residential / 55 South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Assessment key: AMBER- site considered potentially suitable Allocation South Tyneside Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Land Review Mar-16 JA39 SHLAA/ELA Site C3/B1/B2/B8 341 4.6 Very Low Yes No No Church Bank, Jarrow Employment

Sunderland City Council 56 phases 2 to 6 Gentoo short term programme- Designated Open Space Allocation Residential Sunderland City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Mar-10 107 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 450 15.85 Very Low Yes No No SHLAA Sunderland City Council 57 Ferryboat Lane Ferryboat Lane, land at Allocation Residential Sunderland City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Mar-10 301 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 16 0.6 Very Low Yes No No SHLAA Land North and Sunderland City Council 58 West Ferryboat Land North and West Ferryboat Lane Allocation Residential Sunderland City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Mar-10 416 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 190 12.5 Very Low Yes No No SHLAA Lane Sunderland City Council 59 North Hylton Washington Road Allocation Residential Sunderland City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Mar-10 276 SHLAA/ELA Site C3 333 22.2 Very Low Yes No No SHLAA

Sunderland Employment 60 Ferryboat Lane (Sunrise Enterprise Park) Ferryboat Lane (Sunrise Enterprise Park) Allocation Employment Sunderland City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-09 46 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B8 0 12.0 Very Low Yes No No Land Study 2009

Sunderland Employment 61 Pennywell Industrial Estate (18 or SA 1.5) Pennywell Industrial Estate (18 or SA 1.5) Allocation Employment Sunderland City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-09 18 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B8 0 14.4 Very Low Yes No No Land Study 2009

Sunderland Employment 62 Doxford International Doxford International Allocation Employment Sunderland City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-09 24,25,28,29 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B8 0 47.4 Very Low Yes No No Land Study 2010

Sunderland Employment 63 Nissan Nissan Allocation Employment Sunderland City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Sep-09 62 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B18 0 354.0 Very Low Yes No No Land Study 2011

Land south of Follingsby Lane is allocated for development and will deliver: 1. Approximately 22hectares of net developable employment land for B8 Future - Core Strategy and uses. Urban Core Plan for 64 South of Follingsby Lane Allocation Employment Gateshead City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Mar-15 Policy KEA2 Adopted Local Plan B1/B2/B19 0 22.0 Likely Yes No No 2. Approximately 90,000 square metres of warehouse premises (B8 use Gateshead and Newcastle class). upon Tyne 2010-2030

65 Land adjacent to South Follingsby Farm South Follingsby Farm- identified as Unsuitable Allocation Residential Gateshead City Council N/A N/A N/A N/A Gateshead Council SHLAA Jul-13 G310 SHLAA/ELA Site B1/B2/B20 3.0 ha 0.0 Very Low Yes No No

A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Environmental Statement

Appendix 15.4 SHORT LIST OF DEVELOPMENTS

A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Environmental Statement

No Cumulative effects as either: operational effects covered by analysis using traffic model data; no overlap of Zone of Influence; or no temporal overlap during construction periods. Short list Planning Site Area Development KEY: Long list ID Location Development Description Development Type ID Application Status (ha) Certainty Air Quality Cultural heritage Landscape and visual effects Ecology and nature conservation Geology and soils Materials Noise and vibration People and communities Road drainage and the water environment

There would be an additive cumulative adverse effect of, at The schemes do not overlap to create cumulative Hybrid planning application comprising: worst, Minor significance on the landscape character due to There would be an additive adverse effect of Operation = covered by analysis direct adverse risks to habitats, but there would Full planning permission for the erection of 2no manufacturing the combined increase in developed area and short-term loss increased permanent and temporary loss of using traffic model data. be a risk of additive and synergistic cumulative Operation = covered by analysis using traffic model warehouse (Unit A 27,870 sqm and Unit B 46,451 sqm) (use class of existing vegetation. Residents and transient users of the agricultural land, which, at worst, could be a Construction = risk of additive The schemes do not overlap to create adverse effects on local biodiversity / protected data. Construction = there would be a risk of an B2), associated car parking, SuDs, detail access from A1290, internal local road and NMU networks around Downhill Lane Junction, cumulative effect of Minor significance. There There is a risk of an additive adverse effect on adverse effects from dust cumulative direct adverse risks to buried species during operation and construction from Operation = No effect. Construction = Possible cumulative additive cumulative adverse effect of, at worst, road structure and footpaths, turning circles, utilities provision and such as residents of Make-me-Rich Farm, Elliscope Farm, East The sites do not direct overlap and through would be a synergistic adverse effect on users of land drainage and flood risk from increased Land North Of Nissan Agricultural Land emissions where works on both archaeology, but there may be a risk of a the combined loss of habitat and species adverse effect from demand for materials and waste Minor significance on residents and transient users associated landscaping. Hylton and Town End Farm, plus users of the Great North good construction practices, effects beyond the cycleway and Great North Forest Trail crossing change of greenfield to hard standing feeding West Of The A19, East Of A1290 And schemes within 200m of each additive cumulative adverse effect on the disturbance / displacement from works on both disposal if construction periods overlap, but the effect of the local road and NMU networks around Downhill ID1 1 Employment Consented Site 22.20 ha Highly Likely Forest Trail) would experience additive adverse cumulative the site boundaries within the overlapping Downhill Lane Junction, but the cumulative effect into the River Don catchment, but inclusion of North Of Washington Road, Sunderland other (i.e. around Downhill Lane setting of the heritage landscape and non- schemes near Downhill Lane Junction and would be not significant due to type of material demand Lane Junction, such as residents of Make-me-Rich Outline planning permission for the erection of 1no manufacturing effects on visual amenity from the presence of the two zones of influence should result in no would be localised and Not Significant due to the SUDs within both schemes would mean a SR5 3HX SR5 3HU Junction), but application of good statutory historic assets around Downhill Elliscope Farm East Hylton Bridge Local Wildlife compared to A19 Testos Junction scheme and effort to Farm, Elliscope Farm, East Hylton and Town End warehouse (Unit C 28,863 sqm) (use class B2 and/or B8) and 8,805 developments potentially in the same panoramic view from a cumulative effects. context of an existing A19 junction and the cumulative effect of, at worst, Minor construction dust control practices Lane Junction setting. However, this would Site. However, assuming both sites mitigate minimise waste disposal through re-use on site. Farm, plus users of the Great North Forest Trail. Any sqm of commercial development comprising of a Hotel (use class number of locations. However, with very few receptors likely receptor being transient. Driver stress and local significance. and limited receptors at risk mean be at worst of Minor significance. construction effects and seek to minimise net cumulative effect would be, at worst, of Minor C1), Retail (use class A1) and Car Showroom (use class Sui Generis), to be affected by both schemes and suitable establishment of economic benefits from improved traffic flows the cumulative effect should not biodiversity loss, through consultation with the significance. including details of access, infrastructure, car parking, SUDS long term vegetation screening, any cumulative visual would have been considered using the traffic be Not Significant. Local Authority Ecologist, the effects would be of provision and associated landscaping. amenity effect would be at worst of Minor significance modelling data. Minor significance. (mainly during construction).

Operation = No effect. Construction = Possible cumulative Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) effect from demand for materials and waste disposal if Limited Washington Road Usworth Construction of new link road between an existing supplier site and Transport ID2 2 Consented Site 2.2 ha Highly Likely construction periods overlap, but the effect would be not Sunderland SR5 3NS the main Nissan site. Infrastructure significant due to small scale of new link road development compared to A19 Testos Junction scheme.

Infrastructure Advanced Manufacturing Park (IAMP) will provide up to 260,000m2 of floor space. A further 50ha will remain as There would be an additive risk of There would be an additive cumulative adverse effect of There is a risk of permanent and temporary safeguarded land for development in the future as demand for floor There would be an additive adverse effect of cumulative direct adverse effects to buried potentially Moderate significance on the landscape character additive adverse effects on habitats west of the space and services increases. Operation = covered by analysis increased permanent and temporary loss of archaeology and effects on the setting of due to the combined increase loss of rural landscape to A19 between Testos and Downhill Lane junctions Operation = covered by analysis using traffic model In addition to the development of the floor space indicated the using traffic model data. agricultural land, which, at worst, could be a the heritage landscape and non-statutory commercial / infrastructure development, which would need from the combined of IAMP and A19 Testos data. Construction = there would be a risk of an development will include: Construction = risk of additive cumulative effect of Minor significance. There historic assets around Downhill Lane further work to incorporate the schemes into the landscape. junction footprints. There would also be a risk of There would be an additive adverse effect of additive cumulative adverse effect of, at worst, There is a risk of an additive adverse effect on - Internal access roads and footways; adverse effects from dust Operation = No effect. Construction = Possible cumulative would be a synergistic adverse effect on users of Junction. For all these the worst case This in turn would create an potentially additive adverse additive and synergistic cumulative effects on increased permanent loss and temporary Minor significance on residents and transient NMUs land drainage and flood risk from increased - Landscaped areas; emissions where works on both adverse effect from demand for materials and waste the local non-motorised user networks west of the National Strategic cumulative effect would be of Minor effect of potentially Moderate significance to many receptors local biodiversity, such as increased pollution risk disturbance of soils. There would also be a south-west of Testos Junction, especially around change of greenfield to hard standing feeding IAMP Washington Road Usworth - Ecological and landscape mitigation area, surrounding the River Pre-Application schemes within 200m of each disposal if construction periods overlap, but the effect A19 and , especially the cycleway and Great North ID3 4 Infrastructure Project 26 ha Probable significance. The main additive adverse looking towards A19 Testos scheme where IAMP is set in the and Elliscope Farm East Hylton Bridge Local risk of double handling material where the Downhill Lane Junction, such as residents of Make- into the River Don catchment, but inclusion of Sunderland Don, Bridge across the River Don; Submission other, but application of good would be Not Significant due to type of material demand Forest Trail crossing Downhill Lane Junction, but (Employment) heritage effect would be on the setting of background. However, the IAMP footprint may also remove Wildlife Site and disturbance to or displacement sites overlap, but good construction practices me-Rich Farm, Elliscope Farm, East Hylton and Town SUDs within both schemes would mean a - A road bridge across the A19 to connect with Washington Road; construction dust control practices compared to A19 Testos Junction scheme and effort to the cumulative effect would be localised and Not and panoramic views to the east from or screen many of the A19 Testos receptors south-west of of protected species in these areas during and advance planning any cumulative effects End Farm, plus users of the Great North Forest Trail. cumulative effect of, at worst, Minor - Other associated ancillary uses (including a public transport and limited receptors near at risk minimise waste disposal through re-use on site. Significant due to the context of an existing A19 Listed Buildings west of Testos Junction, Testos junction (e.g. residents and transient users of the local operation and construction. However, assuming should be Not Significant. Assuming application of good construction practices significance. interchange, retail, leisure and a hotel, known as ‘the Hub’); and Downhill Lane Junction overlap junction and the receptor being transient. Driver with two major developments needing road and NMU networks around Downhill Lane Junction, such both sites mitigate construction effects and seek to minimise noise emissions, any cumulative effect - Utilities provision with the potential provision of an energy centre, area mean the cumulative effect stress and local economic benefits from improved careful design and screening to mitigate the as residents of Make-me-Rich Farm, Elliscope Farm and East to minimise net biodiversity loss, through would be, at worst, of Minor significance. and electricity sub-station upgrades. should not be Not Significant. traffic flows would have been considered using effect; this could be cumulative effect of Hylton, plus users of the Great North Forest Trail west of consultation with the Local Authority Ecologist, the traffic modelling data. Moderate significance. A19). the effects would be of Minor significance. Other anticipated enabling infrastructure is likely to be produced which can be found within the Scoping Report on the link.

Site of Former Industrial Units Bedewell Industrial Park/Baker Perkins Sports Operation = No effect. Construction = Possible cumulative Ground, Red House Road and Car Park adverse effect from demand for materials and waste Opposite 81-103 Red House Road Erection of 335 residential dwellings (Use Class C3) and associated disposal if construction periods overlap, but the effect ID4 5 Hebburn 1-135 (odd) and 2-98 (even) Housing Consented Site 09.10 ha Highly Likely access, landscaping and engineering works. would be not significant due to type of material demand Adair Way, 2-26 (even) Red House Road, and small scale of housing development compared to A19 Portrush Drive, Troon Walk, Turnberry Testos Junction scheme. Drive, Wentworth Close

Operation = No effect. Construction = Possible cumulative Construction of 36no. dwellings (comprising a mix of 1-3 bedroom: adverse effect from demand for materials and waste Land bounded by Eskdale Drive, Coniston flats, bungalows, semi-detached and terraced properties), new disposal if construction periods overlap, but the effect ID5 7 Drive,Lodore Grove, Kirkstone Avenue Housing Planning Application 0.70 ha Probable boundary treatments, landscaping, parking and associated access. would be not significant due to type of material demand and Grasmere Avenue Jarrow and small scale of housing development compared to A19 Testos Junction scheme. Operation = No effect. Construction = Possible cumulative Erection of 20no. new dwellings comprising 6 apartments, 10 adverse effect from demand for materials and waste bungalows and 4 houses including associated parking, landscaping disposal if construction periods overlap, but the effect ID6 8 ….. Housing Planning Application 0.466 ha Probable and highways improvements. would be not significant due to type of material demand and small scale of housing development compared to A19 Testos Junction scheme. Proposed construction of 55 new dwellings: 29 units at Friar Way / Saxon Way comprising 17 two bedroom houses, 10 three bedroom Land adjacent to two sites Friar houses and 2 one bedroom "Tyneside" apartments and 26 units at Way/Saxon Way and High Street/Stanley Under High Street / Stanley Street comprising 16 two bedroom houses, 2 ID7 14 Street Jarrow 10-66 (even) Friar Way Housing Construction/Compl 00.92 ha Certain two bedroom bungalows and 8 one bedroom "Tyneside" flats. 109, 111, 250-274 (even) High Street 1- ete Associated infrastructure works including new vehicle 23 (odd) Stanley Street access/egress points and new boundary treatments

Operation = No effect. Construction = Possible cumulative adverse effect from demand for materials and waste Land North of Blue Sky Way and Apollo Construction of 3 no. B1, B2, B8 industrial units split across 2 no. Planning Application disposal if construction periods overlap, but the effect ID8 15 Employment 0.5352ha Probable Court Koppers Way Hebburn buildings with ancillary car parking, landscaping and service yards. Submitted would be not significant due to type of material demand and small scale of industrial unit development compared to A19 Testos Junction scheme.

1 to 11 George Court Boldon Colliery Demolition of existing redundant day centre and construction of Planning Permission ID9 17 Former Wilfred Street Day Care Centre 11no. residential housing dwellings with associated road, car Residential N/A Certain (under construction) Wilfred Street Boldon Colliery NE35 9DL parking and landscaping.

Land West of Cotswold Lane and North of Proposed construction of 33no. residential dwelling houses with Planning Permission ID10 18 Hutton Street Boldon Colliery Now 1-34 associated landscape/boundary treatments and creation of new Residential N/A Certain (under construction) Colliery Mews (exc 13) access to highway (Cotswold Lane).

There would be an additive risk of There would be an additive cumulative adverse effect of, at There is a risk of permanent and temporary cumulative direct adverse effects to buried worst, Minor significance on the landscape character due to additive adverse effects on habitats from the There would be an additive adverse effect of Operation = covered by analysis Operation = covered by analysis using traffic model archaeology and effects on the setting of the combined increase in developed area and short-term loss extended works footprint around the A19 increased permanent and temporary loss of using traffic model data. data. Construction = there would be a risk of an the heritage landscape and non-statutory of existing vegetation. Residents and transient users of the between Testos and Downhill Lane junctions. agricultural land, which, at worst, could be a Construction = risk of additive additive cumulative adverse effect during historic assets around Downhill Lane local road and NMU networks around Downhill Lane Junction, There would also be a risk of additive and There would be an additive adverse effect of cumulative effect of Minor significance. There There is a risk of an additive adverse effect on adverse effects from dust Operation = No effect. Construction = Possible cumulative construction of, at worst, Minor significance on Junction. For all these the worst case such as residents of Make-me-Rich Farm, Elliscope Farm, East synergistic cumulative effects on local increased permanent loss and temporary would be a synergistic adverse effect on users of land drainage and flood risk from increased emissions where works on both adverse effect from demand for materials and waste residents and transient users of the local road and NSIP Registered cumulative effect would be of Minor Hylton and Town End Farm, plus users of the Great North biodiversity, such as increased pollution risk and disturbance of soils. There would also be a the cycleway and Great North Forest Trail crossing change of greenfield to hard standing feeding New and improved slip roads and junction layout to support IAMP Transport schemes within 200m of each disposal if construction periods overlap, but the effect NMU networks around Downhill Lane Junction, such ID11 n/a Downhill Lane Junction Scheme (application N/A Highly Likely significance. There is a risk of some Forest Trail) would experience additive adverse cumulative Elliscope Farm East Hylton Bridge Local Wildlife risk of double handling material where the Downhill Lane Junction, but the cumulative effect into the River Don catchment, but inclusion of development and interaction with new A19 Testos Junction layout. Infrastructure other, but application of good would be not significant due to type of material demand as residents of Make-me-Rich Farm, Elliscope Farm, under development) additive adverse effect on the setting of and effects on visual amenity from the presence of the two Site and disturbance to or displacement of sites overlap, but good construction practices would be localised and Not Significant due to the SUDs within both schemes would mean a construction dust control practices compared to A19 Testos Junction scheme and effort to East Hylton and Town End Farm, plus users of the panoramic views to the east from Listed developments potentially in the same panoramic view from a protected species in these areas during operation and advance planning any cumulative effects context of an existing A19 junction and the cumulative effect of, at worst, Minor and limited receptors near at risk minimise waste disposal through re-use on site. Great North Forest Trail. Assuming application of Buildings west of Testos Junction, but the number of locations. However, with very few receptors likely and construction. However, assuming both sites should be Not Significant. receptor being transient. Driver stress and local significance. Downhill Lane Junction overlap good construction practices to minimise noise main influence would be Testos Junction so to be affected by both schemes and suitable establishment of mitigate construction effects and seek to minimise economic benefits from improved traffic flows area mean the cumulative effect emissions, any cumulative effect would be, at worst, the cumulative effect would unlikely long term vegetation screening, any cumulative visual net biodiversity loss, through consultation with would have been considered using the traffic should not be Not Significant. of Minor significance. increase the worse case effect predicted for amenity effect would be at worst of Minor significance the Local Authority Ecologist, the effects would be modelling data. Testos Junction. (mainly during construction). of Minor significance.