Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Legislative
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Effects of Bicameralism on U.S. Appropriations Policies
THE EFFECTS OF BICAMERALISM ON U.S. APPROPRIATIONS POLICIES by MARK EDWARD OWENS (Under the Direction of Jamie L. Carson) ABSTRACT This dissertation examines how supermajority rules interact with other institutional constraints. I study appropriations policies to better understand how the content of legislation develops in response to bicameral differences over a one-hundred and four year period. As each chamber has developed independently of one another, the institutional differences that have emerged have had a dynamic impact on the lawmaking process. The time frame of the study, 1880 to 1984, is particularly important because it captures the years when the Senate grew to play a more active role in the legislative process and a number of key budgetary reforms. To study this phenomenon empirically, I measure how regular appropriations bills were packaged differently by the House and Senate from 1880 to 1984 and compare the final enactment to the difference in chamber proposals to determine the magnitude of a chamber’s leverage on enacted policy changes. By treating the Senate’s choice to amend the House version as a selection effect, we can examine the effect bicameralism has on policy outcomes. Specifically, I analyze a ratio that represents how close the final bill is to the Senate version, given the size of the bicameral distance. Finally, I complete the study by examining how the president influences bicameral negotiations and how bicameralism complicates our theories of intra-branch relations. INDEX WORDS: Appropriations, Bicameralism, Budgeting, Polarization, Senate THE EFFECTS OF BICAMERALISM ON U.S. APPROPRIATIONS POLICIES by MARK EDWARD OWENS B.A., University of Florida, 2006 M.A., Johns Hopkins University, 2008 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2014 © 2014 Mark Edward Owens All Rights Reserved THE EFFECTS OF BICAMERALISM ON U.S. -
Contents Around the Rotunda Around the Rotunda
September 13 - 19, 2019 Report provided courtesy of: KSA Group Contents Around the Rotunda Around the Rotunda ...... 1 Committee News ......... 2 PA GIVEN FAILING GRADE FOR SPENDING VOLKSWAGEN SETTLEMENT Bullet.in.Points .......... 11 MONEY By Matt Hess, Pennsylvania Legislative Services | September 17, 2019 Cosponsor Memos ....... 12 Bill Actions ............. 13 The PennEnvironment Research and Policy Center held a press conference today to announce that they have given Pennsylvania an “F” for how the state is spending the Upcoming Events ........ 18 Volkswagen settlement money. In the News ............. 19 Kelly Flanigan, Global Warming Solutions Campaign for PennEnvironment, noted that SESSION STATUS this week is “National Drive Electric Week” and explained that transportation is the largest At 12:10 p.m. on Friday, source of global warming pollution in the nation and the third largest source in Pennsylvania. June 28, 2019 the Senate “If we’re going to fight climate change, we need to limit global warming pollution from the stands in recess until Monday, transportation sector by transitioning away from dirty fossil-fuel-burning cars and buses and September 23, 2019 at 1:00 investing in electric vehicles (EVs),” she stated. “There is no question we need cleaner p.m., unless sooner recalled vehicles on our roads and there is no cleaner vehicle than an electric vehicle.” by the President Pro Tempore. Flanigan said Pennsylvania received $118 million from the Volkswagen settlement and At 2:10 p.m. on Thursday, explained that the report card scores were based upon eight criteria. “Our research found September 19, 2019 the that Pennsylvania’s funding structure heavily favors dirty diesel buses over electric buses. -
Thom Hartmann
Pennsylvania State Representatives Pennsylvania State Representatives Continued Pennsylvania State Representatives Continued Pennsylvania State Representatives Continued Rep. Aaron Bernstine (R-10) Rep. R. Lee James (R-64) Rep. Tedd Nesbit (R-8) Rep. Tommy Sankey (R-73) 5 East Wing, House Box 202010 145 A East Wing House Box 202064 150 A East Wing Box 202008 149 B East Wing House Box 202073 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2010 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2064 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2008 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2074 Phone: 717-783-8322 Phone: 717-783-8188 Phone: 717-783-6438 Phone: 717-787-7099 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] http://www.repsankey.com/contact.aspx Rep. Ryan Bizzarro (D-3) Rep. Joshua Kail (R-15) Rep. Donna Oberlander (R-63) Rep. Curtis G. Sonney (R-4) 324 Main Capitol Bldg., House Box 202003 428 Irvis Office Bldg., House Box 202015 121 Main Capitol Building Box 202063 214 Ryan Office Bldg., Building Box 202004 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2003 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2015 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2063 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2004 Phone; 717-772-2297 Phone: 717-260-6144 Phone: 717-772-9908 Phone: 717-783-9087 http://www.pahouse.com/3/Contact/ Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Rep. Bob Brooks (R-54) Rep. Mark Longietti (D-7) Rep. Jason Ortitay (R-46) Rep. James Struzzi II (R-62) 155A East Wing House Box 202054 127 Irvis Office Building House Box 202007 143 A East Wing House Box 202046 147 B East Wing, House Box 202062 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2054 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2007 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2046 Harrisburg, PA 17120-2062 Phone: 717-260-6129 Phone: 717-772-4035 Phone: 717-787-1281 Phone: 717-705-7173 Email: www.repbrooks.com/contact Email: [email protected] http://www.reportitay.com/contact.aspx Email: www.repstruzzi.com/contact Rep. -
Annual Report
2 0 1 8 ANNUAL REPORT WAYNE • PIKE • MONROE • CARBON COUNTIES TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL THANKS .................................................................................................. 03 POCONO MOUNTAINS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 04 VISITORS BUREAU EXECUTIVE MESSAGE ........................................................................................... 05 1004 W. Main St. Stroudsburg, PA 18360 MARKETING ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 06 (570) 421-5791 MARKETING & ADVERTISING .............................................................................. 08 [email protected] PoconoMountains.com MARKETING: STREAMING .................................................................................... 11 @PoconoTourism POCONOMOUNTAINS.COM ................................................................................. 12 #PoconoMtns WEBSITE ENHANCEMENTS.................................................................................... 13 SOCIAL MEDIA ....................................................................................................... 14 COMMUNICATIONS .............................................................................................. 15 SALES....................................................................................................................... 16 GROUPS ................................................................................................................ -
Management Challenges at the Centre of Government: Coalition Situations and Government Transitions
SIGMA Papers No. 22 Management Challenges at the Centre of Government: OECD Coalition Situations and Government Transitions https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kml614vl4wh-en Unclassified CCET/SIGMA/PUMA(98)1 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques OLIS : 10-Feb-1998 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Dist. : 11-Feb-1998 __________________________________________________________________________________________ Or. Eng. SUPPORT FOR IMPROVEMENT IN GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES (SIGMA) A JOINT INITIATIVE OF THE OECD/CCET AND EC/PHARE Unclassified CCET/SIGMA/PUMA Cancels & replaces the same document: distributed 26-Jan-1998 ( 98 ) 1 MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES AT THE CENTRE OF GOVERNMENT: COALITION SITUATIONS AND GOVERNMENT TRANSITIONS SIGMA PAPERS: No. 22 Or. En 61747 g . Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format CCET/SIGMA/PUMA(98)1 THE SIGMA PROGRAMME SIGMA — Support for Improvement in Governance and Management in Central and Eastern European Countries — is a joint initiative of the OECD Centre for Co-operation with the Economies in Transition and the European Union’s Phare Programme. The initiative supports public administration reform efforts in thirteen countries in transition, and is financed mostly by Phare. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is an intergovernmental organisation of 29 democracies with advanced market economies. The Centre channels the Organisation’s advice and assistance over a wide range of economic issues to reforming countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Phare provides grant financing to support its partner countries in Central and Eastern Europe to the stage where they are ready to assume the obligations of membership of the European Union. -
Budget Impact in September, Spring Twp
2017 – 2018 COMMONWEALTH BUDGET These links may expire: January 19 Lawmakers hear state tax proposals HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania lawmakers should consider expanding the base of some state taxes and lowering tax rates in order to address long-standing fiscal issues, several economists told members of a House panel Thursday. That could include making more items subject to the state sales tax and... - Altoona Mirror January 17 All aboard plan to spruce up SEPTA's trolley lines SEPTA’s trolleys haven’t been replaced since the 1980s when Ronald Regan was president, yet they are wildly popular with their 100,000 riders who squeeze into them every day. Thankfully, the transit agency wants to replace them with bigger cars which can handle roughly twice as many... - Philadelphia Inquirer January 16 Legislators outline goals for new year Local legislators look forward to passing bills in the new year, and saying goodbye to the budget woes of 2017. Both Rep. Dan Moul (R-91) and Sen. Rich Alloway II (R-33) were unhappy with the decision to borrow money against future revenue in order to patch the... - Gettysburg Times January 14 Lowman Henry: Pa. budget follies set to resume The last time a Pennsylvania governor signed a full, complete state budget into law was July 10, 2014. Gov. Tom Corbett signed off on that state fiscal plan just days after it was approved by the Legislature, completing a four-year run of on-time state budgets.... - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review January 12 Lawmakers react to governor's opioid state of emergency Local lawmakers said Gov. -
2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support
16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support 1 16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support Lilly employees are dedicated to innovation and the discovery of medicines to help people live longer, healthier and more active lives, and more importantly, doing their work with integrity. LillyPAC was established to work to ensure that this vision is also shared by lawmakers, who make policy decisions that impact our company and the patients we serve. In a new political environment where policies can change with a “tweet,” we must be even more vigilant about supporting those who believe in our story, and our PAC is an effective way to support those who share our views. We also want to ensure that you know the story of LillyPAC. Transparency is an important element of our integrity promise, and so we are pleased to share this 2016 LillyPAC annual report with you. LillyPAC raised $949,267 through the generous, voluntary contributions of 3,682 Lilly employees in 2016. Those contributions allowed LillyPAC to invest in 187 federal candidates and more than 500 state candidates who understand the importance of what we do. You will find a full financial accounting in the following pages, as well as complete lists of candidates and political committees that received LillyPAC support and the permissible corporate contributions made by the company. In addition, this report is a helpful guide to understanding how our PAC operates and makes its contribution decisions. On behalf of the LillyPAC Governing Board, I want to thank everyone who has made the decision to support this vital program. -
Representative Districts for the Susquehanna River Basin
April 30, 2021 Representative Districts for the Susquehanna River Basin Rom e !( 118 !( Utica Roche ste r HERKIMER !( !( !( One ida ONEIDA !( S yra cuse He rkim e r Aub urn ONONDAGA 127 Ca na joha rie Ca na nda ig ua !( !( !( !( Ge ne se o Ge ne va !( ONTARIO MADIS ON Coope rstown S CHOHARIE 131 121 !( !( 133 YATES CORTLAND !( 126 101 Cob le skill LIVINGS TON Pe nn Ya n OTS EGO !( Cortla nd !( 102 TOMPKINS Norwich One onta !( S CHUYLER !( 125 CHENANGO !( Itha ca Ba th !( Wa tkins Gle n 122 ALLEGANY S TEUBEN TIOGA Wa lton Corning !( We llsville 132 !( Bing ha m ton Ole a n !( CHEMUNG Owe g o 148 !( !( !( !( 124 123 DELAWARE Elm ira BROOME !( S a yre S US QUEHANNA Port Alle g a ny !( Ma nsfie ld !( Coude rsport !( Towa nda Montrose !( Ga le ton !( 111 McKEAN !( WAYNE 68 BRADFORD Montice llo TIOGA !( POTTER 110 114 Hone sda le Tunkha nnock LACKA- !( Em porium 67 !( !( !( WANNA Dushore WYOMING 112 S t. Ma rys !( CAMERON S cra nton S ULLIVAN 117 !( 139 84 LYCOMING ELK Re novo 113 !( 75 120 Willia m sport Wilke s-Ba rre !( JEFFERS ON CLINTON 83 !( 121 109 LUZERNE 118 DuBois !( 76 CLEARFIELD COLUMBIA 119 66 116 Ea st S troudsb urg !( MON- Bloom sb urg !( Punxsuta wne y Cle a rfie ld CENTRE Le wisb urg TOUR !( Ha zle ton 122 !( !( !( !( UNION CARBON Da nville 77 Le hig hton 73 85 !( S unb ury 107 S ta te Colle g e 171 !( S e linsg rove INDIANA !( !( NORTH- S NYDER 108 UMBERLAND 123 MIFFLIN !( Northe rn !( !( Ca m b ria S CHUYLKILL Pottsville Alle ntown Le wistown JUNIATA !( India na 72 !( 124 Altoona Port Roya l 125 !( Hunting don !( !( DAUPHIN -
Why Pre-K? Pre-K Works, Why Not in PA?
Making the Case for Pre-K for PA 2018 UWP Webinar Series United Way of Pennsylvania www.uwp.org Vision & Goals Pre-K Accessible to Every Child by 2022 United Way of Pennsylvania www.uwp.org Vision: To ensure that all children can enter school ready to succeed by making high-quality pre-k accessible to every 3- and 4-year old in Pennsylvania Goal: By 2022, every at-risk child will have access to a high-quality pre-kindergarten program and middle-income families will more easily afford these services for their children. How to Accomplish this Goal? Work with the Pre-K for PA coalition and policymakers to ensure a state investment of $440 million ($285 million remaining). United Way of Pennsylvania 3 www.uwp.org Coalition Members Pennsylvania’s coalition consists of regional and statewide nonprofit and non-governmental organizations that work together to advance a shared agenda and to advocate on behalf of young children. The Coalition has recruited nearly 16,000 individual supporters, including 130 civic and business leaders and 600 supporting organizations 4 Why Pre-K? Pre-K Works, Why not in PA? United Way of Pennsylvania Access to High Quality Pre-K: Provides Opportunity & Strengthens Schools • Children who are enrolled in a high-quality pre-k program are more likely to advance grades and have improved social skills. • When children begin with high-quality pre-k, this investment prevents the achievement gap from becoming too wide and reduces the need for costly interventions in the future. United Way of Pennsylvania 6 www.uwp.org Pre-K -
Pensylvania Kicks the Can Down the Road “So Tell Me What You Want, What You Really, Really Want.” 1997
Volume 96, Number 2 October 2012 www.asce-pgh.org Pensylvania Kicks the Can Down the Road “So tell me what you want, what you really, really want.” 1997. What were you doing in 1997? How old were your kids? What car did you drive? Bob Carlisle’s “Butterfly Kisses” was the #12 hit. The Spice Girls had 3 top hits in 1997. Basic Cable TV was $29.52 per month. A postage stamp was 29¢. Republican Tom Ridge was Governor. Three Rivers Stadium existed. 1997 Construction Cost Index: 5825. August, 2012 CCI was 9351, up 60%. The PA Liquid Fuel tax, to maintain our roads, was 12¢ per gallon. It still is. In 2012, the Oil Franchise Tax also remains at 19.2¢ per gallon. In 2012, 17% of Pennsylvania bridges are structurally deficient, and 800 must be replaced, and all average over 50 years old. About 20% of the workers in the Pennsylvania Construction industry are unemployed, with 3,300 less in August. In 1997 the Pennsylvania unemployment rate was about 5.1%. After the inflation adjustment to the tax, the rate declined to about 4.2%. In August, 2012 it was 8.1%. Following a nearly decade-long effort in crafting and advocating legislation designed to explore and create public-private partnerships (P3) in transportation, this summer Gov. Tom Corbett signed House Bill 3 into law, making it Act 88 of 2012. It funded nothing. 1997 Governor Tom Ridge “This act opens a new chapter in the way Pennsylvania can fund projects designed to repair and replace our structurally deficient roads and bridges with the cooperation, financial resources and efficiencies of the private sector.” Retiring Rep. -
S/L Sign on Letter Re: Rescue Plan State/Local
February 17, 2021 U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Members of Congress: As elected leaders representing communities across our nation, we are writing to urge you to take immediate action on comprehensive coronavirus relief legislation, including desperately needed funding for states, counties, cities, and schools, and an increase in states’ federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP). President Biden’s ambitious $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan will go a long way towards alleviating the significant financial strain COVID-19 has placed on our states, counties, cities, and schools, and the pocketbooks of working families. Working people have been on the frontlines of this pandemic for nearly a year and have continued to do their jobs during this difficult time. Dedicated public servants are still leaving their homes to ensure Americans continue to receive the essential services they rely upon: teachers and education workers are doing their best to provide quality education and keep their students safe, janitors are still keeping parks and public buildings clean, while healthcare providers are continuing to care for the sick. Meanwhile, it has been ten months since Congress passed the CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund to support these frontline workers and the essential services they provide. Without significant economic assistance from the federal government, many of these currently-middle class working families are at risk of falling into poverty through no fault of their own. It is a painful irony that while many have rightly called these essential workers heroes, our country has failed to truly respect them with a promise to protect them and pay them throughout the crisis. -
Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard
This is a repository copy of Comparing the dynamics of party leadership survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82697/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Heppell, T and Bennister, M (2015) Comparing the dynamics of party leadership survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard. Government and Opposition, FirstV. 1 - 26. ISSN 1477-7053 https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.31 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard Abstract This article examines the interaction between the respective party structures of the Australian Labor Party and the British Labour Party as a means of assessing the strategic options facing aspiring challengers for the party leadership.