Statistical Entropy of Radiation: Different Approaches
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Universal Journal of Physics and Application 1(2): 121-124, 2013 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2013.010211 Statistical Entropy of Radiation: Different Approaches A.V. Shepelev I.M. Gubkin Russian State University, Department of Physics, Moscow, Russia 119991 *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright © 2013 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved. Abstract A number of definitions of entropy in optics It can be shown, that Planck’s entropy of the black have both advantages and disadvantages. The major features radiation is proportional to the third degree of temperature. of different entropy definitions are briefly characterized. The Unlike other entropy definitions in classical physics, such principal distinction between the statictics entropy definition as Boltzmann’s entropy, the Planck’s entropy can be used and the thermodynamics one is indicated. The even in case if the measure, including a Lebesgue’s measure, diffraction-caused radiation entropy is calculated. is not conserved. Therefore Planck’s entropy is applicable to the irreversible processes which do not obey the Liouville’s Keywords Optics, Radiation, Entropy, theorem. Thermodynamics Besides fundamental importance of Planck’s radiation PACS 78.20.Bh entropy for the solution of blackbody radiation problem, that has led to occurrence of quantum physics, it is possible to note also only some particular results: The general thermodynamic restrictions on efficiencies of 1. Introduction the Stokes and anti-Stokes luminescence have been established [3]; the general conditions on radiation According to the memoirs C. Shannon, when discussing temperature rising in passive optical systems have been the ideas that formed the basis of his famous work [1], John received, that, in particular, has allowed interpreting the von Neumann told him: "You should call it entropy, for two features of nature of astrophysical masers. [4,5]. reasons ... In the second place, and more important, nobody However Planck’s entropy is based on concept of knows what entropy really is". Now a number of problems in brightness which is not an observable value [6]. First, for quantum and statistical optics requires the concept of brightness calculation, both the knowledge of local values of radiation entropy, but at the moment there are a lot of coordinate and the knowledge of a corresponding projections different entropy definitions. All of them have both of radiation impulse are necessary simultaneously, that is advantages, and drawbacks. Characterising them, first of all impossible. Secondly, there is no exact definition of it is necessary to distinguish the entropy introduced through brightness of partially coherent radiation. Its definition concepts of warmth and temperature, i.e. thermodynamically through coherence degree and Wigner’s function, (R. Clausius), from the entropy determined through the concept of distribution function, the field of physics where k 2 BW(r,n)= (r +− r'/2,r r'/2)exp( −ik s⊥ r') d r', the first were L. Boltzmann and J.W. Gibbs. 2π ∫ Only the most known and often used for description of the optical phenomena the entropy concepts presented by ( W is the cross-spectral dencity function in points different authors are considered in this short review. More r' r' information about the problem of radiation entropy and r + , r − , k is a wavenumber, n is a unit specific results can be obtained from the referenced papers 2 2 and their references. directional vector) is more heuristic, than proved. 2) Shannon’s entropy is one of the fundamental concepts 2. Results of the classical information theory, and is defined as: ∑ ppiiln , where p is probability. However for 1) Planck’s entropy of radiation [2] is based on the concept i of radiation brightness B and on the distribution function of a noncommuting operators, in particular for operators of coordinate and impulse, it is impossible to consider a joint system of noninteracting bosons: distribution of corresponding observables. In quantum optics, kν2 cB 2 cB 2 cB 22 cB a numer of authors propose to account additively the S =1 + ln 1 +−ln . contribution of coordinate and impulse distributions into this PL 2 3 3 33 c hν h ν hh νν entropy, 122 Statistical Entropy of Radiation: Different Approaches 22 2 2 S=−ψ( x ) ln ψ ( x ) dx − ψ ( p ) ln ψ ( p ) dp expressed through a density matrix, is widely used in SH ∫∫ quantum mechanics. Moreover, in many respects this The fundamental inequality, named the entropic concept has formed a basis of rapidly developing area of uncertainty relation, is proved for such presentation of mathematics – non-additive theory of probability. The Von entropy: Neumann’s entropy of the whole system can be zero, but the entropy of the sybsystems differs from zero. Statistical SSH ≥+1 ln π distribution arises in this case, as it were, out of nothing. For recently offered probability representation of quantum However von Neuman’s entropy contradicts the mechanics other new inequalities for distributions of thermodynamic entropy increasing with time up to the probabilities have been received also [7]. It is shown, that greatest possible value corresponding to an equilibrium this entropy correlates with squeezing and other nonclassical condition. From the movement equation for a density matrix characteristics of radiation states [8]. ∂ρ (Particular subject is the use of the maximum entropy i =[ HH ρ] = ρ−ρ H ∂t method (MEM) for correcting the optical information. A lot of works is devoted to this subject. Application of MEM and definition of von Neumann’s entropy, the movement enables to increase significantly the resolving power of an equation follows for entropy optical system. Usually, the entropy of an optical image is − dS calculated according to Shannon, but in some cases it is −ik 1 N =Tr( H ρ ln ρ−ρ H ln ρ ) preferable to use the Boltzmann’s entropy.) dt 3) Wehrl’s entropy is defined via coherent states [9], From the property of a trace commutativity, 1 ρ ρ= ρρ α=(q + ip) , ρW ( α) = αραˆ , TrHH ln Tr (ln ) 2 and from commutativity of the density operator ρ and as its function ρρln , it follows, that 1 2 SS=( ρ( α=−ρ)) ln ρd α. dSN WW π ∫ WW TrHHρ ln ρ= Tr ρ ln ρ i.e. = 0 dt So, the Wehrl’s entropy is based on the quasi-probability, Hence, the von Neumann’s entropy of a closed system not on the probability itself. Obviously, according to remains constant in time (more detailes are in [11]). That is uncertainty principle, ρα cannot by localized within ( ) why the von Neumann’s entropy in quantum optics does not the area that is smaller than h . (P. Erenfest was the first who enable to get a correct answer for the irreversible processes. suggested the idea of introduction of the similar entropy, that Thus, the quantum entropy fails when one wants to use it for accounted for a minimal possible phase volume). justifying the classical entropy. But if excluding the For Wehrl’s entropy the condition of monotony for variables, which concern the parameters of matter, compound systems is satisfied: if a system A is a composition conversion of the incident-field characteristic function to the of two subsystems 1 and 2, then scattered-field one is not unitary, and can not be described by SASWW( )≥ (1) . the Schrödinger's equation, but can be described by the kinetic equation. Only in this case the von Neumann's The mimimum value of the Wehrl’s entropy is 1, unlike entropy is not constant for a closed system and can coinside Neumann's entropy and Shannon’s entropy. For coherent with the thermodynamics entropy. states, SW =1. 5) As for example it is useful to consider the increase of Wehrl’s entropy describes well enough also the time the radiation entropy due to a finite beam aperture. dynamics of systems, for example time evolution of the Localization of radiation by a finite aperture leads to isolated system “a field + two-level atom” [10]. Wehrl’s uncertainty of the wave vector and, consequently, to entropy in this example approaches saturation, though not emergence of the irreversibility. As mentioned above, it can monotonically in time. be adequately described only by means of the For photon-number states radiation the Wehrl’s entropy is thermodynamics entropy of radiation introduced by Planck. given by [10]: (For the equilibrium radiation, the von Neumann’s and Planck’s entropies actually coincide under replacement of n 1 the normalized brightness by the number of photons per . SW =1 + n + ln n ! +γ nn − ∑ k mode n, and are defined by the equilibrium distribution of k=1 the non-interacting bosons: 4) Von Neumann’s entropy SN =∫∫{(1 + n) ln( 1 + n) − n ln nd} Ωσ d ). Sk=−ρρTr( ln ) , Ωσ N For axially symmetric, generally "soft" aperture, both the Universal Journal of Physics and Application 1(2): 121-124, 2013 123 brightness and the number of photons per mode are radiation emitted by the antenna with the same intensity proportional to U2D. Here, U2 is the intensity distribution distribution. (In order to make adequate the comparison over the aperture, D is the directivity pattern in the far-field between the entropies of radiation diffracted by different zone. The latter is expressed by the Hankel transform: apertures, the additional conditions have been imposed - the equality of radiation power and the ideal transmission at 1 some point). Fig.1 shows the entropy of the transmitted Fq = (∫ U() r I0 ( qr ) rdr) (2π )2 radiation, depending on the ratio of the effective diameter of the aperture to the wavelength for a circular hole and a 2 Gaussian aperture. For both apertures there is a monotonic Fq Dq()= decrease of entropy with increasing of this ratio, which is 2 ∫ Fq qdq explained by the decrease of the diffraction effects.