DOCSLIB.ORG

Towson University Office of Graduate Studies a STUDY of NATURE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Towson University Office of Graduate Studies a STUDY of NATURE i Towson University Office of Graduate Studies A STUDY OF NATURE PLAY SPACE SUSTAINABILITY IN THE PIEDMONT REGION OF MARYLAND by Victoria Rose Brusaferro A thesis Presented to the faculty of Towson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Science in the Department of Environmental Science of Towson University Towson, Maryland 21252 (May, 2015) Thesis Committee: Dr. Sarah Haines Dr. Amy Trauth-Nare Dr. Brian Fath ii ii ABSTRACT Most of the United States population lives in urban areas, where heightened anthropogenic activity acts as a source of the majority of greenhouse gases (Hoornweg, 2011). Adaptive ways to deal with regional land management efforts need to be addressed in an effort to combat the effects of spreading urbanization (Roling, 1997). A positive environmental ethic is developed through children’s regular contact with nature, as well as substantial nature-based play (Bunting and Cousins, 1985). This paper proposes targeting the age when children first begin developing their bond with earth to harness a generation of environmentally conscious thinkers that will integrate sustainable practices in their behaviors and careers (Sobel, 1994). The most rapidly urbanizing region of Maryland, the Piedmont, can be studied to discern the present-day perspectives of best sustainable practices for naturalization of outdoor spaces specifically targeted to children ages four to seven years old in that area. ii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………..vi LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………...vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE ..................................................................................................................5 1.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ........................................................................................8 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................10 2.1 EARLY CHILDHOOD AND NATURE .................................................................10 2.1.1 Benefits of getting outside .................................................................................11 2.1.2 Framework for Maryland ..................................................................................12 2.2 MARYLAND PIEDMONTPLATEAU PROVINCE ..............................................15 2.2.1 Overview of attributes .......................................................................................16 2.3 NATURE PLAY SPACES .......................................................................................17 2.3.1 Brief history of the playground..........................................................................18 2.3.2 Maryland resources for outdoor play................................................................20 2.4 SUSTAINABILITY .................................................................................................22 2.4.1 Definition ...........................................................................................................23 2.4.2 Economic ...........................................................................................................25 2.4.3 Development ......................................................................................................27 2.5 USING COUNTIES AS CASE STUDIES ..............................................................30 2.5.1 Cecil ...................................................................................................................32 2.5.2 Carroll ...............................................................................................................33 2.5.3 Baltimore ...........................................................................................................34 2.5.4 Baltimore City ...................................................................................................34 2.5.5 Harford ..............................................................................................................35 2.5.6 Howard ..............................................................................................................35 2.5.7 Frederick ...........................................................................................................36 2.5.8 Anne Arundel .....................................................................................................36 CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS .............................................37 3.1 METHODS ...............................................................................................................37 3.2 CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................38 3.3 CONTEXT WITH SIMILAR STUDIES .................................................................39 iii 3.4 DATA SOURCES ....................................................................................................40 3.4.1 Nature play space surveys .................................................................................41 3.4.2 Nature play space interviews .............................................................................42 3.5 DATA ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................43 CHAPTER 4. FINDINGS ...............................................................................................46 4.1 CHARACTERISTICS .............................................................................................47 4.1.1 Place based ........................................................................................................49 4.1.2 Experiential .......................................................................................................50 4.1.3 Physical location ...............................................................................................51 4.1.4 Legislative support ............................................................................................53 4.1.5 Community involvement ....................................................................................54 4.1.6 Malleability........................................................................................................55 4.1.7 Disconfirming codes ..........................................................................................56 4.2 USES ........................................................................................................................57 4.2.1 Environmental education...................................................................................57 4.2.1 Eco-psychological development ........................................................................58 4.2.1 Community benefit .............................................................................................59 4.2.1 Hindrances ........................................................................................................61 4.2.1 Disconfirming codes ..........................................................................................63 4.3 SUSTAINABILITY .................................................................................................64 4.3.1 Environmental ...................................................................................................65 4.3.2 Economic ...........................................................................................................66 4.3.3 Social .................................................................................................................67 4.3.4 Disconfirming codes ..........................................................................................68 CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION ..........................................................................................70 5.1 FUTURE IMPLICATIONS .....................................................................................83 APPENDIX A .................................................................................................................103 APPENDIX B .................................................................................................................104 APPENDIX C .................................................................................................................106 APPENDIX D .................................................................................................................108 REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................121 CURRICULUM VITA ..................................................................................................127 iv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. Diagram showing the aggregation of codes into groups with corresponding sub-code………………………………………………………………………………….87 FIGURE 2. Example of process by which research coding was done in order to thematically analyze survey data………………………………………………………...88 FIGURE 3. NASA satellite image of North American city lights……………………....89 FIGURE 4. Maryland land use as reported by the Maryland Department of Planning....90 v LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. Focal research questions of study with data collection techniques and analysis………………………………………………………………………………...…91 TABLE 2. Summary of populations, financial data, and land use of seven Piedmont counties and one Atlantic Coastal Plain province……………………………………..…92 TABLE 3. Summary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Irvine Nature Center Stream & Wetland Restoration Design-Build
    IRVINE NATURE CENTER Irvine Nature Center Stream & Wetland Restoration Design-Build Owings Mills, Maryland An educational nature center lives its mission to protect nature by restoring stability, function, and habitat to more than 1,500 feet of degraded stream and adjacent wetlands. ditched to support agricultural wet habitat areas, restore ripar- practices. Those alterations, ian wetland hydrology, reduce along with more recent land sediment and nutrient loading, use changes on adjacent and and reestablish a mosaic of native nearby properties, had caused emergent, forested, and scrub ocated on a 210-acre site the streams and wetlands to shrub wetlands. The project re- L featuring forests, mead- become degraded. stored 1,550 linear feet of stream ows, wetlands, and headwater and restored and enhanced tributaries of the Jones Falls, With funding from the wetlands adjacent to the stream. a highly regarded headwater Chesapeake and Atlantic Revegetation involved the plant- trout stream in Baltimore Coastal Bays Trust Fund Capital ing of more than 2,100 trees and County, Irvine Nature Center Improvement Grant and a shrubs, and seeding with native offers experiential environ- partnership with the Maryland dry and wet meadow herba- mental education programs Association of Soil Conservation ceous seed mixes. The project for children and adults of Districts (MASCD), Resource is regarded by the MASCD as a the greater Baltimore area. Environmental Solutions, model for municipalities seeking With a mission that includes Biohabitats, and Irvine Nature nutrient and sediment credits. inspiring people to explore, Center teamed up to implement respect, and protect nature, stream and wetland restora- SERVICES Irvine recognized the need to tion.
    [Show full text]
  • New State Plans Reveal Tough Path to 2025 Cleanup Goals ≈ PA Plan Admits It Falls Short of Nia, Which Submitted a Draft Plan to the Programs to Implement Them
    M ay 2019 Volume 29 Number 3 New state plans reveal tough path to 2025 cleanup goals ≈ PA plan admits it falls short of nia, which submitted a draft plan to the programs to implement them. the Bay’s most important habitats for goal; NY hints it may not follow U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The agency has the ability to take juvenile crabs, fish and waterfowl. When that falls far short of its cleanup goal. New action against states that fall behind on the algae die, they draw oxygen from the theirs; ag and stormwater runoff York submitted a plan, but suggested it their goals, and pressure is mounting for water, leading to oxygen-starved dead bedevil almost all jurisdictions. did not intend to fully implement it. Pennsylvania to face consequences if it zones that put large areas of the Bay BY KARL BLANKENSHIP Other states drafted plans that meet continues to come up short. off-limits for everything from fish to In April, states submitted yet another their goals on paper. But in many cases, The region has been working to clean bottom-dwelling worms. round of roadmaps outlining how they require a nearly unprecedented up the Bay since 1983 and set its first After earlier goals were missed, the they intend to reach Chesapeake Bay increase in the amount of on-the-ground voluntary cleanup goal in 1987. It then EPA imposed a regulatory plan, called cleanup goals by 2025. But, 36 years actions that reduce polluted runoff from repeatedly established and fell short of the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum after the region committed to cleaning farms and developed lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Localities Challenged to Meet Stormwater Reductions More Pollutants from Coal Ash
    April 2019 Volume 29 Number 2 Coal ash contaminated groundwater at almost all monitored sites ≈ Sites found in MD, PA and VA; one in the Patuxent watershed was among the 10 worst in the nation. BY WHITNEY PIPKIN Just after Virginia legislators voted to end the storage of coal ash in pits where it could leach into groundwater and rivers, a report released in March revealed widespread coal-ash contami- nation in 39 states — and at more than 91 percent of the power plants moni- tored. They include sites in Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia. The report by Earthjustice and the Environmental Integrity Project relies on monitoring data from coal-fired power plants that an Obama era Construction crews restore Chinquapin Run in Baltimore city, moving sewer line out of a channel and stabilizing banks. regulation required them to release Trees planted along stream by volunteers were taken out, but officials say the reductions in erosion and sewage leaks for the first time in 2018. Of the 265 outweigh the loss. (Dave Harp) power plants that were impacted by the requirement, the report found that groundwater near 242 of them contained “unsafe levels” of one or Localities challenged to meet stormwater reductions more pollutants from coal ash. It also Anne Arundel and Baltimore counties localities could claim greatly increased cited a coal ash landfill in Maryland’s ≈ Critics question effectiveness said they’ve managed to avoid a similar pollution reduction credits for stream Patuxent River watershed as one of the of some methods, say MD has fate. But they only did so with help restoration projects — far beyond what 10 worst coal ash contamination cases let some places off easy.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Conference 2005 Weekend Field Trips
    MNPS 2005 Annual Fall Conference Weekend Field Trips Field trips will be held Saturday afternoon and Sunday. They have been grouped on this page around the conference themes, and by levels of plant and/or ecological knowledge. Saturday afternoon field trips will end in time for the social. Lengthier field trips and those to more distant sites are scheduled for Sunday. Start and end times of Sunday field trips vary. SIGN UP FOR FIELD TRIPS SATURDAY MORNING AT THE CONFERENCE. • Field Trips to Natural Areas • Native Plant Garden Tours • Field Trips to Managed Natural Areas, Mitigation Sites, and Other Planting Sites Field Trips to Natural Areas Primarily for Beginners Introductory field trips. Leader will make a point of explaining basic concepts of native plant communities and plant/animal relationships, and will use mainly common names. • Irvine Nature Center (Saturday) – BEGINNER ONLY. Introduction to plant communities and plant/wildlife relationships. • Patapsco Valley State Park (Saturday) – Primarily for BEGINNERS, may be of interest to others who want to get to know this park – unusually rugged terrain. Emphasis on plant/wildlife relationships. Beginner - Intermediate Field trips to exceptionally fine natural areas. Leader will make a point of explaining basic concepts of native plant communities and habitat, and will use mainly common names. • Robert E. Lee Memorial Park (Saturday) – Globally rare ecosystem: mainly serpentine forest, may see some grasses and rare plants. • Gunpowder Falls State Park (Sunday) - Piedmont forest. Emphasis on plant communities. • Marshy Point Nature Center (Sunday) – Canoe trip through estuarine marshes and open water, short walk through Coastal forest. • North Point State Park (Sunday) – Marsh plants, butterfly and waterfowl habitat field trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Keep Maryland Beautiful Award Recipients
    Protecting Land Forever Keep Maryland Beautiful Award Recipients Fiscal Year 2019 Bill James Environmental Grants Historic Sotterley, Inc Howard County Antique Farm Machinery Club Mountain Laurel Garden Club North County High School Pocomoke Middle School Clean Up & Green Up Maryland Grants African American Firefighters Historical Society Alice Ferguson Foundation Allegany County Commissioners & the Allegany County Solid Waste Management Board Annapolis Arts District Annapolis Green, Inc. Antietam-Conococheague Watershed Alliance Back River Restoration Committee, Inc. Banner Neighborhoods Bel Air Downtown Alliance Bethesda Green Beyond the Classroom, Inc. Brunswick Main Street, Inc. BUILD - Rebuild Johnston Square Neighborhood Org C.A.R.E Community Association, Inc Centreville Main Street Town of Centreville City of Greenbelt Department of Public Works Downtown Frederick Partnership Downtown Sykesville Connection at the Community Foundation of Carroll County Druid Heights Community Development Corporation Dundalk Renaissance Corporation Elkton Alliance, Inc. Fusion Partnerships, Inc. (Whitelock Community Farm) Galena Tree and Park Committee Havre de Grace Citizens Against Trash Historic Frostburg - a Maryland Main Street Community Howard County Conservancy I'm Still Standing By Grace Intersection of Change, Inc. Let's Beautify Cumberland! Main Street Historic Chestertown Main Street Middletown, MD Inc Main Street Princess Anne Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Milton Montford Montgomery Parks Foundation Park Heights Renaissance Pigtown Main Street, Inc. Sandtown South Neighborhood Alliance Southeast Community Development Corporation Strong City Baltimore Takoma/Langley Crossroads Development Authority, Inc. The 6th Branch The Town of Colmar Manor Town of Emmitsburg Town of Manchester Town of Oakland Town of Thurmont & Main Street Westport Community Economic Development Corporation Margaret Rosch Jones Awards All Saints Episcopal Church Cool Green Schools Maryland Coastal Bays Program Sky Valley Association, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus Hinders Bay Restoration Efforts, Seafood Industry
    April 2020 Volume 30 Number 2 Coronavirus hinders Bay restoration efforts, seafood industry ≈ Cleanup and planting in coming months, and projects, farm visits put possibly years, at a time when on hold; groups worry they had hoped to significantly increase spending on the Bay about funding for future cleanup. BY BAY JOURNAL STAFF “There’s obviously going Watermen have no to be a delay in any new plans restaurants that can buy their and conservation work,” said catches. Help for farmers who Lindsay Thompson, execu- want to install runoff controls tive director of the Maryland has been sharply curtailed. Association of Conservation Streams throughout the region Districts. In a sentiment are missing their annual spring reflected by many, she added, cleaning. And many students “Right now, it’s really just are losing their chance to [about] trying to keep the experience the Chesapeake wheels rolling and keep Bay firsthand. everyone safe.” The impact of the new coronavirus, barely on the Delays & cancellations radar only a few months Tree plantings, school field ago, is rippling through the trips, citizen oyster restoration Chesapeake Bay region, with activities and the region’s larg- Brendan Burke, impacts felt from Pennsylvania est litter cleanup event are all president of the farm fields to Eastern Shore being postponed or altered as Maritime Heri- oyster grounds. While some environmental groups struggle tage Chapter of impacts are minor, such as with the sweeping disruptions. the Archaeologi- the postponement of meetings “We’re in uncharted terri- cal Society of and cleanup events, others tory,” said Willy Agee, vice Virginia, walks could become significant if president of the Chesapeake by the ribs of the COVID-19 crisis lingers, Bay Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 33, Number 1 (October, 2012)
    Phaëton The Official Newsletter of the Maryland Entomological Society Volume 33, Number 1 October 2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ EDITOR: Eugene J. Scarpulla – [email protected] FACULTY SPONSORS: Frank E. Hanson and Austin P. (Bob) Platt Department of Biological Sciences University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) 1000 Hilltop Circle Baltimore, MD 21250 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Meeting Announcement The Maryland Entomological Society's 288th regular meeting will be held Friday, 19 October 2012, at 8:00 p.m., in Room 004 (one floor below the street level), Biological Sciences Building, University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC). Bring a friend and specimens, observations, and books to share. Refreshments will be provided. Presentations are scheduled to begin at 8:15 p.m. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Speaker: Leo J. Kenefic, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Maryland
    [Show full text]
  • April/May/June 2015 Trailblazer
    April/May/June 2015 Supporting Oregon Ridge Park TRAILBLAZERand Nature Center for 32 years WANT BUTTERFLIES? DON’T FORGET THE CATERPILLARS! Presentation By Naturalist Sheryl Pedrick Monday, April 20, 2015, 7:30 PM Most people love butterflies in their garden and often provide flowering plants to attract them. However, many WHAT’S INSIDE... aren’t certain or aware of how to attract the greatest diversity of butterfly species. One solution is to consider the caterpillars, WILDLFOWER WANDERINGS and the plants on which they depend. Join Sheryl Pedrick, Talk by Naturalist Heather Helm Ladew Gardens’ Education Director, on a metamorphic May 18, 7:30 PM journey to examine the full life cycle and needs of common butterflies of the central Maryland region. Examine PRIMITIVE TECHNOLOGY WEEKEND recommended nectar plants for butterflies and the host May 2 and 3, 10 AM to 4 PM plants for their caterpillars. Also, learn about Ladew’s 1500 MUSIC IN THE WOODS square foot, native butterfly house, which features all four life cycle stages of numerous butterflies (and moths), including May 9, 10 AM to 4 PM monarchs, spicebush swallowtails, buckeyes, hummingbird PICNIC UNDER THE STARS moths and more. June 19, 6 PM, Location in Park TBA Sheryl Pedrick began her environmental education/ naturalist career almost 20 years ago at Oregon Ridge Nature SECRETS AND MYSTERIES OF SPRING WILDFLOWERS Center as a weekend/seasonal naturalist. She received her Master’s Degree in Environmental Studies from Montclair essay by ORNC Director Winny Tan State University through a Graduate Fellowship with the ORNC HOPES TO BE A GREEN CENTER New Jersey School of Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Reports
    March 2013 MARYLAND BIRDLIFE 35 CHAPTER REPORTS ALLEGANY & GARRETT COUNTIES BIRD CLUB The Allegany/Garrett Chapter is a small one, but even so, we had plenty of activities this year, starting off with our annual picnic at Carey Run in September. It’s always a good way to get the year started, and we had a nice turn-out. Bill Devlin led a number of us on a hike around the Blue Bird trail, pointing out bear damage as we walked. Bill has been responsible for the Blue Bird trail for 39 years!!, and wants to hand the job over to someone else. He is actively seeking a replacement. We held all our meetings at Compton Hall, Frostburg State University. We had excellent speakers this past year, including Donnelle Keech of The Nature Conservancy, speaking on forest habitat conservation; Gwen Brewer and George Jett, talking about their trip to Cuba (and a good overview of what Cuba is like today). Our Annual Banquet speaker was Ron Gut- berlet, speaking on Alaska 2008. We have a nice turn-out for the banquet, with approximately 33 attendees. Our speakers for January through April were Sara Rothamel, an FSU graduate student, who gave a presentation on “Territoriality and habitat composition of Cerulean war- bler assemblages in Western Maryland”; Tom Matthews, retired biologist from DNR, who spoke about restoring habitat for the woodcock and golden-winged warbler; J.B. Churchill gave a presentation on “Birding tech”; and Mikey Lutmerding gave a great presentation on “Birding in Peru from the Andes to the Pacific.” Our meetings were generally well attended this year! We participated in the Fall count, the Christmas count, and the May count.
    [Show full text]
  • Cromwell Valley Park
    BALTIMORE BIRD CLUB PROGRAM 2014 - 2015 Updated March 2015 BALTIMORE BIRD CLUB a chapter of the MARYLAND ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Cylburn Arboretum 4915 Greenspring Avenue Baltimore, MD 21209-4168 Website: http://www.baltimorebirdclub.org/ Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/382565775136349/members/ OFFICERS PRESIDENT ..................................................................................... Joan Cwi 633 Stoney Spring Drive, Baltimore, MD 21210 .......................... 410 467-5352 ........................................................................................ [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT ............................................................................. Peter Lev 7 Devon Hill Rd., Unit A6, Baltimore MD 21210 ......................410 823-2962 ......................................................................................... [email protected] TREASURER ................................................................................. Dick Krejci 101 Daleview Court, Timonium, MD 21093................................... 410 252-7147 ............................................................................. [email protected] RECORDING SECRETARY ................................................ Mary Anne Fluke 4246 Darleigh Rd, Nottingham, MD 21236 ................................... 443 690-4319 .................................................................................... [email protected] MEMBERSHIP .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FY14 Approved Grants Grant Organization Amount Description
    FY14 Approved Grants Grant Organization Amount Description Allegany for support of professional development, stream investigation costs, and student led action project supplies to support the Restore Allegany County Public Schools $1,500.00 and Explore your Schoolshed Program. for a tree planting on Frost Avenue by Frostburg State University Frostburg State University $2,095 students and community volunteers. for costs associated with implementing four rain gardens and a Allegany Soil Conservation District $25,129 bioswale at the George's Creek Elementary School. for partial transportation and native plant costs for 50 students to visit Swan Creek Wetlands at Cox Creek followed by a planting on West Side Elementary School $3,090 their school campus. Ridge and Valley Streamkeepers $4,451 for costs associated with preparing and printing a report card. for partial program, transportation, native plant and supply costs for 66 fourth grade students to attend a field experience to the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center followed by a planting West Side Elementary School $4,461 on their school campus. for support of professional development, stream investigation costs, and student led action project supplies to support the Restore Allegany County Public Schools $999.13 and Explore your Schoolshed Program. Anne Arundel for partial program and transportation costs for 75 students to attend a field experience to the Smithsonian Environmental Talbott Springs Elementary School $1,000.00 Research Center. for native plants and supplies for an action project for a 3-part Annapolis Maritime Museum $1,000.00 service learning internship program for local high school students. for water quality monitoring and outreach supply costs to measure chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) concentrations and total suspended solids to clarify which one is the primary source of South River Federation $1,240 decreased water clarity in the South River, MD.
    [Show full text]
  • Native News, May/June 2002
    Native News Newsletter of the Maryland Native Plant Society May/June 2002 Volume 2 Number 3 Inside This Issue: Upcoming Monthly Meetings President’s Letter “The Flora of the Greater Washington, D.C. Area” Page 2 ~ Tuesday, May 28, 7:00 pm MNPS Contacts Visitors Center Auditorium of the National Zoo, Page 2 Washington, D.C. ~ Committee Updates and Stanwyn Shetler, Botanist Emeritus, National Museum of Natural History, Volunteer Needs Smithsonian Institution, and author of Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Page 3 Plants of the Washington – Baltimore Area, will give a presentation on the ~ botanical work in the greater Washington, D.C. area, from the early botanists and floras up to and including the current flora checklist. Changes in spring Montgomery County flowering times will also be discussed. This regular monthly meeting of the Celebrates Legacy Open Space Maryland Native Plant Society is cosponsored by the Virginia Native Plant Acquisition Society and the National Zoo. Page 4 ~ Directions: From the Capital Beltway (I-495) take the Connecticut Avenue It’s Your Website Exit 33 south for about 5 miles. The Zoo will be on your left at 3001 Page 4 Connecticut Ave. Parking Lot A is closest to the Auditorium. After-hours ~ parking is free. Follow signs to the Visitors Center/Auditorium. Late Spring Field Trips By Metro: take the Red Line to the Woodley Park/Zoo/Adams-Morgan stop Page 5 or the Cleveland Park stop; the Zoo entrance lies halfway between these ~ stops. Please note that it is an uphill walk from the Woodley Park stop to the Zoo.
    [Show full text]