DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT For Modifications to Federal Levee Systems R-616-613 (Missouri River Right Bank and Papillion Creek Left Bank) and R-613 (Papillion Creek Right Bank, Missouri River Right Bank, and Platte River Left Bank) Sarpy County, Nebraska U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwest Division Omaha District Prepared for: Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District 8901 S. 154th St Omaha, NE 68138 Contact: Marlin Petermann 402.444.6222 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt and Ullevig FYRA Engineering 321 S. 9th Street 12702 Westport Parkway, Suite 300 Lincoln, NE 68508 Omaha, NE 68138 Contact: Amy Zlotsky Contact: Lindy Rogers 402.438.7530 402.934.8475 Revised December 2017 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District December 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Location and General Description .......................................................................................................2 1.2 Regulatory Background...................................................................................................................................5 1.3 Project Need....................................................................................................................................................6 1.4 Project Purpose...............................................................................................................................................7 1.5 Prior Reports .................................................................................................................................................10 1.6 Public Notification..........................................................................................................................................10 2.0 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Components of On-site, Off-site, and Non-structural Alternatives.................................................................13 2.2 Purpose and Practicability Screening of Alternatives ....................................................................................17 2.2.1 Alternative 1: Raise Levee Embankment and Improve Seepage Berms per USACE ATR Team Design Standards..............................................................................................................17 2.2.2 Alternative 2: Raise Levee Embankment and Improve Seepage Berms per Alternative USACE Design Standards...........................................................................................................18 2.2.3 Alternative 3: Raise Levee Embankment and Improve Seepage Berms per Combination Design Standards........................................................................................................................18 2.2.4 Alternative 4: Raise Levee Embankment and Install Relief Wells ...............................................19 2.2.5 Alternative 5: Raise Levee Embankment and Install Full Cutoff Wall..........................................19 2.2.6 Alternative 6: Construct Floodwalls on Top of Levees and Improve Seepage Berms per USACE ATR Team Design Standards ........................................................................................20 2.2.7 Alternative 7: Construct Floodwalls on Top of Levees and Improve Seepage Berms per Alternative USACE Design Guidance..........................................................................................20 2.2.8 Alternative 8: Construct Floodwalls on Top of Levees and Improve Seepage Berms per Combination USACE Design Guidance.......................................................................................21 2.2.9 Alternative 9: Construct Floodwalls on Top of Levees and Install Relief Wells............................21 2.2.10 Alternative 10: Construct Floodwalls on Top of Levees and Install Full Cutoff Wall ....................22 2.2.11 Alternative 11: Widen the Existing Channel and Improve Seepage Berms per USACE ATR Team Design Standards......................................................................................................23 2.2.12 Alternative 12: Widen the Existing Channel and Improve Seepage Berms per Alternative USACE Design Standards.........................................................................................23 2.2.13 Alternative 13: Widen the Existing Channel and Improve Seepage Berms per Combination Design Standards...................................................................................................24 2.2.14 Alternative 14: Widen the Existing Channel and Install Relief Wells ...........................................24 2.2.15 Alternative 15: Widen the Existing Channel and Install Full Cutoff Wall......................................25 2.2.16 Alternative 16: Provide Channel and Overbank Modifications.....................................................26 2.2.17 Alternative 17: Provide Upstream Storage ..................................................................................26 2.2.18 Alternative 18: Provide Non-Structural Restrictions and Acquire Lands......................................27 Draft Environmental Assessment i Federal Levee Systems R-616-613 and R-613 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District December 2017 2.2.19 Alternative 19: No Action Alternative ...........................................................................................27 2.3 Summary of Purpose and Practicability Screening........................................................................................28 2.4 Aquatic Resources Screening of Alternatives................................................................................................31 2.5 Summary of Aquatic Resources Screening...................................................................................................33 2.6 Alternatives to be Carried Forward................................................................................................................37 2.6.1 Alternative 3 – Proposed Action ..................................................................................................37 2.6.2 Alternative 19 – No Action ...........................................................................................................42 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ...............................................................43 3.1 Cultural Resources........................................................................................................................................46 3.2 Environmental Justice....................................................................................................................................47 3.3 Air ..................................................................................................................................................................50 3.4 Noise .............................................................................................................................................................50 3.5 Vegetation and Invasive Species...................................................................................................................51 3.6 Prime Farmland.............................................................................................................................................53 3.7 Floodplain Protection.....................................................................................................................................55 3.8 Economics.....................................................................................................................................................61 3.9 Water Quality.................................................................................................................................................66 3.10 Wetlands........................................................................................................................................................68 3.11 Threatened and Endangered Species...........................................................................................................70 3.12 Fish and Wildlife ............................................................................................................................................76 3.13 Raptors and Migratory Birds..........................................................................................................................77 3.14 Hazardous Materials......................................................................................................................................78 3.15 Recreational Resources ................................................................................................................................83 4.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ............................................................................................................................................. 84 4.1 Past, Present, and Future Activities...............................................................................................................84 4.2 Road Construction.........................................................................................................................................85 4.3 Development .................................................................................................................................................86
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sarpy County Appendix Papio-Missouri River Nrd Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    FEBRUARY 2016 SARPY COUNTY APPENDIX PAPIO-MISSOURI RIVER NRD MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK CONTENTS PLAN OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................... 1 SARPY COUNTY .......................................................................................................... 3 CITY OF BELLEVUE ..................................................................................................33 CITY OF GRETNA .....................................................................................................61 CITY OF LA VISTA ...................................................................................................81 CITY OF PAPILLION ...............................................................................................106 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ...........................................................................................137 PAPILLION-LA VISTA COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT .......................................162 Section Seven: Sarpy County Appendix Overview PLAN OVERVIEW This plan is an update to the Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District (P-MRNRD) Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) approved in 2011. The plan update was developed in compliance with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000). Hazard mitigation planning is a process in which hazards are identified and profiled, people and facilities at risk are identified and assessed for threats and potential vulnerabilities,
    [Show full text]
  • [LR152] the Committee on Transportation and Telecommunications
    Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Rough Draft Transportation and Telecommunications Committee October 08, 2009 [LR152] The Committee on Transportation and Telecommunications met at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, October 8, 2009, in Room 138 of Metro Community College, Papillion, Nebraska, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on LR152. Senators present: Deb Fischer, Chairperson; Tim Gay; Charlie Janssen; Scott Lautenbaugh; and LeRoy Louden. Senators absent: Kathy Campbell; Galen Hadley; and Arnie Stuthman, Vice Chairperson. SENATOR FISCHER: Welcome to the Transportation and Telecommunications Committee. My name is Deb Fischer. I am Chair of the committee. I am from Valentine, Nebraska, and I represent Legislative District 43. I would like to thank Senator Gay and Metro Community College for providing us with this facility today and Senator Gay for helping us get organized to be here. We have had a number of hearings across the state on highway funding. We began in Kearney. We went to North Platte, Scottsbluff, Alliance. Yesterday we were in Columbus and Fremont. And we started in Lincoln at the first part of September so this will be our last hearing. I hoped we have folks here who will be able to offer us information and suggestions because that's what we're here for. At this time, I would like to introduce the members of the committee. On my far right, we have Senator LeRoy Louden. He is from Ellsworth, Nebraska. Next, we have Senator Charlie Janssen from Fremont. On my immediate right is our committee counsel, Dusty Vaughan.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Highway Design Public Hearing Agnew North and South April 28, 2004, 7:30 P.M
    Notice of Highway Design Public Hearing Agnew North and South April 28, 2004, 7:30 p.m. The Nebraska Department of Roads, along with the State Highway Commission, will hold a Highway Design Public Hearing regarding Project STPD-BR-79-2(108), known as "Agnew North and South," on April 28, 2004, 7:30 p.m. at American Legion Post 371, 430 West 2nd Street, Valparaiso, Nebraska. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ROADS NOTICE OF HIGHWAY DESIGN HEARING Date: April 28, 2004 gation will be required. The department intends to Time: 7:30 p.m. establish replacement wetlands for about 2.5 acres on Place: American Legion Post 371 public right-of-way along the project. Realignment of 430 West 2nd Street two segments of stream channel will be required to Valparaiso, Nebraska construct the project. The public hearing is being held to provide informa- The Nebraska Department of Roads along with the tion about design features of the project. All people State Highway Commission will hold a public hearing are invited to attend and present relevant comments regarding reconstruction of about 8 ½ miles of Nebra- and questions. ska Highway 79 south of Valparaiso. Written statements and exhibits may be presented The proposed project in Saunders and Lancaster at the hearing, and they will be accepted as part of Counties involves grading, asphalt surfacing, bridges, the public record for 10 days after the hearing. culverts and lighting. The project is identified as STPD- BR-79-2(108), also known as Agnew North and The public is invited to stop at the hearing site South.
    [Show full text]
  • PORT of HOOD RIVER COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA May 1, 2018 Marina Center Boardroom
    PORT OF HOOD RIVER COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA May 1, 2018 Marina Center Boardroom 5:00 P.M. Regular Session 1. Call to Order 2. Modifications, Additions to Agenda 3. Open Public Hearing on Draft Administrative Rules Governing Public Private Partnerships related to Bridge Replacement (Kevin Greenwood – Page 3) 4. Public Comment (5 minutes per person per subject; 30-minute limit) 5. Consent Agenda a. Approve Minutes of April 17 Spring Planning Work Session and Regular Session (Jana Scoggins – Page 53) 6. Reports, Presentations and Discussion Items a. Expo DDA Lot 6 Parking Analysis (Michael McElwee – Page 59) b. Bridge Replacement Project Update (Kevin Greenwood – Page 69) c. Spring Planning Discussion Topic: Future Focus (Michael McElwee – Page 93) 7. Director’s Report (Michael McElwee – Page 111) 8. Commissioner, Committee Reports a. Airport Advisory Committee – April 26 9. Action Items a. Approve Contract with S2 Contractors, Inc. for Paving East Portion of West Jensen Building Parking Lot (Anne Medenbach – Page 115) b. Approve Contract for Stadleman Waterline Improvement Project (Anne Medenbach – Page 117) c. Approve Service Contract with Kapsch TraffiCom USA for Tolling System Hardware Service Not to Exceed $43,662 (Fred Kowell – Page 119) d. Approve Port Resolution No. 2017-18-5 Adopting Personnel Policies as Defined (Fred Kowell – Page 127) 10. Commission Call 11. Close Public Hearing Executive Session under ORS 192.660(2)(e) Real Estate Negotiations. 12. Possible Action 13. Adjourn If you have a disability that requires any special materials, services, or assistance, please contact us at 541-386-1645 so we may arrange for appropriate accommodations.
    [Show full text]
  • Approve Agreement Between the Om
    CITY OF PAPILLION MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORT August 6, 2019 Subject: Type Submitted By: Approve Agreement Between the Christine Myers, City Omaha-Council Bluffs Metropolitan Area RESOLUTION NO. Administrator Planning Agency, Sarpy County, City of R19-0156 Papillion and City of Gretna for an I-80 Interchange Planning and Environmental Linkages Study SYNOPSIS Resolution R19-0156 approves an Agreement between the Omaha-Council Bluffs Metropolitan Area Planning Agency (MAPA), Sarpy County, City of Papillion and City of Gretna for an I-80 Interchange Planning and Environmental Linkages Study. Approval of Resolution R19-0156 will provide for the funding and administration of a Planning and Environmental Linkages Study for a new interchange along Interstate 80 in Sarpy County that is proposed between the locations of Nebraska Highway 31 (N-31) interchange to the west and Nebraska Highway 370 (N-370) to the east. The study shall consist of developing the actual Area of Potential Effect (APE) to be included in the study, broadly considered to be between Harrison Street to the north, Platteview Road to the south, N-370 and I-80 to the east, and Pflug Road and I-80 to the west. FISCAL IMPACT One-third of study costs above the $125,000 amount provided by the Metropolitan Area Planning Agency federal transportation planning funds (PL), currently estimated at approximately $60,000. RECOMMENDATION Approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution #R19-0156 2. Agreement RESOLUTION R19-0156 BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Papillion that the Agreement between the Omaha-Council Bluffs Metropolitan Area Planning Agency, Sarpy County, City of Papillion and City of Gretna for an I-80 Interchange Planning and Environmental Linkages Study, is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Gretna, Nebraska City Council August 6, 2019
    City of Gretna, Nebraska City Council August 6, 2019 A meeting of the Gretna City Council was held on August 6, 2019. Mayor Timmerman announced that the open meetings laws is located in the back of the room. The Mayor called the meeting to order. Present: Logan Herring, Angie Lauritsen, Bill Proctor, Jason Stahr. Notice of the meeting was given in advance thereof to the Mayor and City Council, published in the Gretna Guide and posted in at least three Public places as shown by the Certificate of Posting Notice attached to these minutes. All proceedings hereafter shown were taken while the convened meeting was open to the attendance of the Public. CONSENT AGENDA AND INFORMATIONAL REPORTS Approval of Consent Agenda - Motion to Approve: 1) Approval of Agenda for August 6, 2019 2) Approval of Council Minutes, July 16, 2019 3) Approval of Claims Claims A&M ex 590.00; AT&T ex 45.55; Abes ex 1,135.60; Adms & Sllvn PC ex 62,066.00; Advtng Seed ex 6,120.00; AFLAC ex 954.24; A Lauritsen ex 40.00; Anytm Wrldwd ex 1,952.09; Aqua- Chem ex 3,667.77; AtoZ Dtbs ex 3,528.00; Bkr & Tylr ex 1,233.20; Big Rig Rpr ex 79.82; Blck Hls ex 108.90; BCBS ex 20,198.01; B Rieck ex 60.00; B Jacques ex 37.78; Crl Cnstrn ex 240.88; Cntr Pnt Lrg ex 86.88; Cntry Lk ex 339.02; Cty Omh Cshr ex 181,022.25; Cncrt Sply ex 725.00; Core & Main ex 292.75; Core Tech ex 8,774.80; Cox ex 2,653.78; Crdt Bru Srvs ex 20.00; Drbrn Ntl Ins ex 504.42; ECHO Grp ex 237.04; Feld Equip ex 5,152.00; Frgsn Enter ex 354.46; Frst Wrlss ex 555.00; Grg Dr Srvs ex 790.00; GDI LLC ex 3,117.90; G
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln Highway Special Resource Study / Environmental Assessment 2 1
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Lincoln Highway Lincoln Highway Special Resource Study / Environmental Assessment 2 1 3 4 6 5 8 7 Cover Illustrations Key 1. Dodge Street circa 1930 (Nebraska) Dodge Street in Omaha attracted the Lincoln Highway in 1913 and numerous highway improvement projects such as this 1930s-era road widening and grade separation. 2. Lisbon (Ohio) The early Lincoln Highway was the 'Main Street of America' bringing a sense of identity and connectivity to the small down- towns it passed through. Towns like Lisbon, Ohio, readily changed the name of their main street to 'Lincoln Way.' 3. Hotel Joliet (Illinois) Widely advertised by motor guides and postcards, the Hotel Joliet benefited from its central location relative to four major trunk routes that came to intersect in Joliet, Illinois; the Lincoln Highway (U.S. 30), U.S. 66, U.S. 52 and U.S. 6. 4. Wooster Motel (Ohio) The Wooster Motel was one of many Lincoln Highway cabin courts that emerged on the new, lucrative commercial strip at the edge of town. This was a considerably less formal setting catering to a growing number of road-weary middle class travel- ers looking to avoid the pomp, social scrutiny and expense of better apportioned hotels downtown. 5. Lincoln Highway Bridge (Iowa / Illinois) Built in 1891, the Fulton and Lyons Bridge across the Mississippi River was one of the more significant pieces of infrastructure inherited by the Lincoln Highway. 6. Toll Gate Rock (Wyoming) Westward Lincoln Highway motorists charted their progress using familiar landmarks, such as Toll Gate Rock along the Green River in Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • 3" #Has$Lfication
    Fi{R-9-30O (11-73) L$niterJStates Separtaraentof the lnterisr ' .- ! Heritage Cons'ervatinn and ilecreation Service i--.cr!-ICFS use onlv :..:'..i . ':l { .)l . g rrcelved 1l,1 P"*a,tlgmffffiegist..*r s'f fi"$ss'freru*,ru$e,ses i - ,'l *;te entered 'i $nw'pm'f stry--*h$ $ ffi?ngaat e,on F'earffa '4 -{ , 1 ,:,: See instructions in How to Comptefef{ati ona!Fegister Forms Type ail entries--completeapplicable sections $ " Li{affi?e historic Jotrn Sautter Farnhouse sY00-11 and/orcornmon Sautter Farnihouse H" Locfiti'Bn street & number 220 Norrh Jefferson Street - not for publication city, town ?api1-lion - vicinityof congressionatdistrict Second \--.L-^ -!.^ state _\ <-:J I d.5 A-O. code 031 county SarPY code 1-53 3" #Has$lfication Gategory Ownership Status Preserrt Use - district X pubiic -- occupied - agriculture __ museum _ X_ ouiroing{s) -* prlvate -X- unoccupied - commercial -__ park - structure - both _--- work in progress --L educational - privateresidence - site Fublic Acquisition Accessibie -- en?ertainment _-- religious -- object -.- in process -L yes: restricted - governmenl - scientific - beingconsidered - yes: unrestricted - industrial - transportation -__no - rrrilitary - other: 4, ffi-ws?er@f Fropertil Union Pacif ic Railroad Contoanv narne Papillion Ar:ea l{istorical Sogrg!y___*7o__H . ri. _Rranil i. G.e_n_ara1__Llanager_ " L4L6 Doclge Street, street& rrunrhrer LL23 Delmar Street _0_uraha_*_I_ebsaska-6-8fZa- city, town Paoill ion - vicinityof slate Nebraska S, L'p$.rtii *n ,rlf fl-*..qJ aI cour+house,registry of deeds,etc.
    [Show full text]
  • JPA) to BE HELD THURSDAY, August 22, 2013 at 8:00 A.M
    AGENDA FOR THE WEST HAYMARKET JOINT PUBLIC AGENCY (JPA) TO BE HELD THURSDAY, August 22, 2013 AT 8:00 A.M. CITY-COUNTY BUILDING 555 S. 10TH STREET CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROOM 112 LINCOLN, NE 68508 1. Introductions and Notice of Open Meetings Law Posted by Door (Chair Beutler) 2. Public Comment and Time Limit Notification Announcement (Chair Beutler) Individuals from the audience will be given a total of 5 minutes to speak on specific items listed on today’s agenda. Those testifying should identify themselves for the official record. 3. Approval of the minutes from the JPA meeting held July 26, 2013 (Chair Beutler) (Staff recommendation is for the JPA Board to approve the minutes as presented) 4. Approval of July 2013 Payment Registers (Steve Hubka) Public Comment (Staff recommendation is for the JPA Board to approve the payment registers) 5. Review of July 2013 Expenditure Reports (Steve Hubka) Public Comment 6. WH 13-76 Resolution to approve Amendment No. 2 to the Contract Agreement between Terracon Consultants Inc. and the West Haymarket Joint Public Agency (JPA) to add Pedestrian Bridge special inspections to the Contract for West Haymarket Arena and Garage Special Inspections. (Paula Yancey) Public Comment (Staff recommendation is for the JPA Board to approve the resolution) 7. WH 13-77 Resolution to approve Maintenance Contract between the West Haymarket Joint Public Agency and the Downtown Lincoln Association to provide day to day maintenance of the planting areas and sidewalks within the West Haymarket Area. (Dan Marvin) Public Comment (Staff recommendation is for the JPA Board to approve the resolution) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1
    FHR-a-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1. Name historic John' Sautter/Farmhouse (SYOO-11) and/or common Sautter Farmhouse 2. Location street & number 220 North Jefferson Street not for publication city, town Papillion vicinity of congressional district Second state Nebraska code 031 county Sarpy code 153 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X public occupied agriculture museum X building(s) private X unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress X educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process _JL_ yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property Union Pacific Railroad Company name Papillion Area Historical Society r./n H. H. Rranrfl-., flpnpral 1416 Dodge Street, street & number 1123 Delmar Street Omaha, Nebraska 68179 city, town Papillion vicinity of state Nebraska 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Register of Deeds, Sarpy County Nebraska street & number Nebraska Highway 370 and South 84th Street city, town Papillion state Nebraska 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Nebraska Historic Buildings Survey has this property been determined elegible? __ yes no date On-going federal JL__ state county local depository for survey records 1500 R Street city, town Lincoln state Nebraska 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated X unaltered original site good ruins altered X moved date November 15, 1979 X fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The Sautter family farmhouse is a one-and-one-half story, white, wood-frame structure with attached cobshed.
    [Show full text]
  • Res. R21-0123
    CITY OF PAPILLION MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORT JULY 6, 2021 AGENDA Subject: Type: Submitted By: Adoption of the 2021 Papio-Missouri Resolution Mark A. Stursma, AICP River Natural Resources District #R21-0123 Planning Director Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. SYNOPSIS This is a request for adoption of the 2021 Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. The purpose of the mitigation plan is to lessen the effects of disasters by increasing the disaster resistance of the Natural Resources District and participating jurisdictions located within the planning boundary by identifying the hazards that affect the Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District and prioritize mitigation strategies to reduce potential loss of life and property damage from those hazards. FEMA regulations require documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of the City of Papillion in the form of a resolution and further requesting approval of the plan at the Federal Level. FISCAL IMPACT Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION Approval. BACKGROUND In September 2006, City Council adopted a multi-jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan that was prepared by the Nebraska Department of Natural Resources. In August of 2011, City Council adopted the 2011 update to the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. In July 2016, City Council adopted the 2016 update to the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. The Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2020 was signed into law on October 30, 2000, placing new emphasis on state and local mitigation planning for natural hazards and requiring communities to adopt a hazard mitigation action plan to be eligible for pre-disaster and post-disaster federal funding for mitigation purposes.
    [Show full text]