AMIA 2017 Annual Symposium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AMIA 2017 Annual Symposium AMIA 2017 Annual Symposium Washington, DC, USA 4 - 8 November 2017 Volume 1 of 3 ISBN: 978-1-5108-5307-2 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2017) by American Medical Informatics Association All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2018) For permission requests, please contact American Medical Informatics Association at the address below. American Medical Informatics Association 4720 Montgomery Lane, Suite 500 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 USA Phone: (301) 657-1291 Fax: (301) 657-1296 www.amia.org Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2633 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Enabling Interoperability between Healthcare Devices and EHR Systems.................................................................................................1 Swapna Abhyankar ; Paul Schluter ; Kathryn Bennett ; Daniel J. Vreeman ; Clement J. McDonald Applying a Process-based Framework to examine Interunit Patient Transfers .........................................................................................3 Joanna Abraham ; Shirley Burton ; Imade Ihianle Medical Benefit Drug Claims: Assessing the NDC Documentation Gap .....................................................................................................5 Terrence J. Adam ; Bithia Anderson ; Angeline Carlson ; Mahsa Salsabili ; Glenn Trygstad ; Stephen Schondelmeyer Advanced Use of EHRs in US Hospitals and the Emergence of a Digital "Use" Divide ............................................................................7 Julia Adler-Milstein ; A J. Holmgren Phenotyping Physiologic Measurement of Lung Function in a Large Electronic Health Record Using Automated Tools.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................9 Kathleen M. Akgün ; Keith Sigel ; Kei Cheung ; Farah Kidwai-Khan ; Alex K. Bryant ; Cynthia Brand ; Amy C. Justice ; Kristina Crothers Why Predicting Postprandial Glucose Using Self-monitoring Data is Difficult........................................................................................11 David Albers ; Matthew Levine ; Andrew Stuart ; Bruce Gluckman ; George Hripcsak ; Lena Mamykina Pain Assessment Automatic Documentation Initiated by Patients and Parents: A Case Study from the University of Minnesota Masonic Children’s Hospital ...................................................................................................................................................13 Ranyah Aldekhyyel ; Michael Pitt ; Yan Wang ; Genevieve B. Melton Quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and St. John Sepsis Surveillance Agent to Detect Patients At-Risk of Sepsis: An Observational Cohort Study...........................................................................................................15 Robert C. Amland ; Bharat B. Sutariya Identifying and Predicting Falls among Elderly Residents of Baltimore City Using Hospital Discharge Summaries and Health Information Exchange Data........................................................................................................................................................17 Laura Anzaldi ; Elyse Lasser ; Joshua Sharfstein ; Hadi Kharrazi Differing Patterns of Satisfaction and Perception Among Clinical and Non-clinical Users Following Replacement of a Legacy EHR System..................................................................................................................................................................................19 Nate C. Apathy ; Joshua R. Vest ; Nir Menachemi ; John W. Putz ; Justin Morea ; Christopher A. Harle Novel Targeting of Clinical Decision Support: Utilizing Machine Learning To Improve Provider Acceptance – Repeat Imaging as an Example.......................................................................................................................................................................21 Wasim Al Assad ; Ivan Ip ; Li Zhou ; Ramin Khorasani Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria Fail to Meet Burden of Generalizability ...............................................................................................23 Amelia J. Averitt ; Chunhua Weng ; Adler Perotte Using Computer Agents to Explain Clinical Test Results............................................................................................................................25 Renato F. Azevedo ; Kuangxiao Gu ; Yang Zhang ; Victor Sadauskas ; Tarek Sakakini ; Daniel Morrow ; Mark Hasegawa-Johnson ; Thomas S. Huang ; Suma Bhat ; Ann Willemsen-Dunlap ; Donald J. Halpin ; James F. Graumlich ; William Schuh EHR-based Quality Measurement to Reduce Antibiotic Use in Children.................................................................................................27 L. Charles Bailey ; Hanieh Razzaghi ; Elizabeth R. Earley ; Jeanhee Moon ; Levon Utidjian ; Jessica Hawkins ; Chris Forrest Usability and Acceptability of a System to Identify Pediatric Patients at Risk of 30-day Hospital Readmission Prior to Discharge.......................................................................................................................................................................................................29 Amie Barda ; Lingyun Shi ; Andrew H. Urbach ; Srinivasan Suresh ; Fuchiang Tsui Large-Scale Text Mining of Social Determinants from Electronic Health Records: Case Studies of Homelessness and Adverse Childhood Experiences..............................................................................................................................................................31 Cosmin A. Bejan ; John Angiolillo ; Douglas Conway ; Robertson Nash ; Jana Shirey-Rice ; Loren Lipworth-Elliot ; Robert M. Cronin ; Jill Pulley ; Sunil Kripalani ; Shari Barkin ; Kevin B. Johnson ; Joshua C. Denny A Digital Health Advisor for High-Need, High-Cost Patients: Exploring Needs, Functions and System Constraints.........................33 Onil Bhattacharyya ; Arnav Shah ; Lovisa Gustafsson ; Kathryn Mossman ; Eric Schneider The OpenNotes Patient and Family Reporting Tool: Engaging Patients and Families as Partners in Safety and Quality ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................35 Fabienne C. Bourgeois ; Macda Gerard ; Alan Fossa ; Lindy Lurie ; Dianne Arnold ; Monique Mello ; Jenny Sadler ; Patricia A. Folcarelli ; Sigall Bell Evaluating the Quality of Patient Address Data in an EHR system...........................................................................................................37 Michael N. Cantor Data-driven Risk Characterization and Prediction of Renal Failure among Diabetic Type 2 Patients using Electronic Medical Records.............................................................................................................................................................................39 Prithwish Chakraborty ; Vishrawas Gopalakrishnan ; Sharon Hensley Alford ; Faisal Farooq Using Electronic Health Records Data for Comparative Effectiveness Research ....................................................................................41 David Cheng ; Ashwin Ananthakrishnan ; Tianxi Cai Patient and Physician Predictors of Patient Receipt of Empiric Therapies Recommended by a Computerized Decision Support System: A Cohort Study....................................................................................................................................................43 Angela Chow ; David C. Lye ; Onyebuchi A. Arah Opportunities and Challenges for an Interdisciplinary Team to Guide Adoption of Technology to Dissipate Threats to Patient Safety in Real-Time..........................................................................................................................................................45 Anuj K. Dalal ; Theresa E. Fuller ; Pamela M. Neri ; Dominic Breuer ; David Bates ; James Benneyan Use of Clinical Phenotypes and Non-negative Tensor Factorization for Heart Failure Prediction........................................................47 Yu Deng ; Al'Ona Furmanchuk ; Robert Chen ; Faraz S. Ahmad ; Jimeng Sun ; Abel N. Kho Meeting User Needs for a Data Discovery Index of Biomedical Big Data..................................................................................................49 Ram Dixit ; Deevakar Rogith ; Vidya Narayana ; Mandana Salimi ; Anupama E. Gururaj ; Lucila Ohno-Machado ; Hua Xu ; Todd R. Johnson Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Community Health Assessment and Surveillance .......................................................51 Brian E. Dixon ; P. Joseph Gibson ; Karen F. Comer ; Jian Zou ; Marc Rosenman ; Jennifer Williams Predictors of OpenNotes Use Among Veterans receiving Mental Health Care ........................................................................................53 Steven K. Dobscha ; Lauren M. Denneson ; Maura Pisciotta ; Donald S. Bourne ; David Phillips-Moses ; Susan Woods The Role of Chronic Inflammation
Recommended publications
  • Fall 2014 Course Schedule
    Fall 2014 Course Schedule TPL011: Introduction to C Programming ................................................................................................................................ 2 TPL036: Introduction to Ruby and Rails ................................................................................................................................. 2 TPL064: An Introduction to Computer Vision and Automated Object Recognition ................................................................ 3 TPL103: Introduction to Intel x86-64 ....................................................................................................................................... 4 TPL109: Introduction to ARM (Advanced/Acorn RISC Machine) Architecture & Software Systems ..................................... 5 TPL465: Intermediate Intel x86: Architecture, Assembly, and Applications ........................................................................... 6 TPL477: Introduction to Android Forensics and Security Testing ........................................................................................... 8 TPL482: JSON and JSON Schema ........................................................................................................................................ 9 TST414: Introduction to Bayesian Data Analysis.................................................................................................................. 10 TSV062: Privacy Engineering ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Software Design
    Software Design April 26, 2013 1. Introduction 1.1.1. Purpose of This Document This document provides a high level description of the design and implementation of Cypress, an open source certification testing tool for the calculation of Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) as part of the stage 2 Meaningful Use (MU2) requirements of the EHR Incentive Program. This document has been written for software engineers, software architects, and technical program managers. The latest information about Cypress is available at the project’s open source website[1]. 1.1.2. Overview Cypress is an open source (see section 5) certification testing tool that automates testing of the ability of electronic health record (EHR) systems to correctly calculate MU Stage 2 CQM results. Cypress is recognized by the Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT (ONC) as the official test tool for use by Authorized Testing Laboratories (ATL) in CQM certification. In addition, Cypress can be used, free of charge, for pre-certification testing by any EHR developer. The CQM certification criteria addressed by Cypress are: • Capture and Export - the ability of an EHR system to capture the data required for each CQM for which the EHR system is being certified through its clinical user interface and to create a QRDA-I formatted data file with appropriate content that can be input by another EHR system for use in CQM calculation • Import and Calculate - the ability of an EHR system to incorporate data (from other EHR systems where necessary) in QRDA-I format and correctly calculate the CQM results and present them in QRDA-III format • Electronic Submission - the capability of an EHR system to create a standard data file that can be electronically accepted by the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) Cypress includes a standard set of synthetic patient records that exercise all of the MU Stage 2 CQMs.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Training Courses
    Fall 2014 Course Schedule TPL036: Introduction to Ruby and Rails .................................................................................................................................. 2 TPL482: JSON and JSON Schema ............................................................................................................................................. 3 SV066: Linux/Unix Security ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 TSV436: Secure Code Review .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1 | P a g e Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Case Number 14-3731 ©2014 The MITRE Corporation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Fall 2014 Course Schedule TPL036: Introduction to Ruby and Rails Course Description: This course provides a thorough introduction to the Ruby programming language. Students will explore what differentiates Ruby from other modern programming languages. The class will have a strong focus on the tools that Ruby provides to generate logic and build applications with less code than other programming languages. Once a basic understanding of the Ruby programming language is attained, the class will provide an introduction to Ruby on Rails. This is a popular development framework for rapidly creating web applications. Students will leave the class with the tools they need to create simple Ruby and Rails
    [Show full text]
  • Toby Cabot Email: [email protected] URL: Http
    Toby Cabot Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.caboteria.org/~tobyc/ Who am I? • I'm a technical architect, engineer, and erstwhile manager who has been responsible for software development and IT organizations that build and run large, high-volume transaction systems. I design and write software and have grown and managed organizations up to 35 people. • I have been successful at clean-slate development efforts, and have also taken 'raw' applications and turned them into manageable products. • I have written, deployed, and managed business-critical Ruby On Rails applications, both web-facing and internal. • I have worked extensively with large-scale technology, both proprietary and Open Source. • I am well-versed in the procedural aspects of software development such as configuration management and policy development, and have worked extensively with Agile, Scrum, Kanban, and User Stories. Back in the dark ages I was even involved in an ISO-9000 certification (twice), and in a CMM effort. • I have managed IT organizations through periods of growth and technology transitions. Employment History Chief Software and Operations Architect Affectiva, Boston, MA April 2013–Present Affectiva is an MIT Media Lab spin-off that reads peoples' emotions from their facial expressions. We use Tensorflow, Ruby on Rails, Python, MySQL, and Presto/Hadoop. We run our infrastructure on AWS using AMI's and Docker and we use Terraform, Chef and ad-hoc Python scripts to manage it. I'm the company's engineering technical leader. This involves applying the core technology to specific applications such as market research, cloud API's, and mobile apps.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment H (Health Information Technology)
    Prepared by: The MITRE Corporation A Product of the CMS Alliance to Modernize Healthcare Federally Funded Research and Development Center Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Prepared for: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs At the Request of: Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 Section 201: Independent Assessment of the Health Care Delivery Systems and Management Processes of the Department of Veterans Affairs Assessment H (Health Information Technology) September 1, 2015 Prepared by CAMH under: Prime Contract No. HHS-M500-2012-00008I Prime Task Order No. VA118A14F0373 This document was prepared for authorized distribution only. It has not been approved for public release. ©2015 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Assessment H (Health Information Technology) This page intentionally left blank. The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of The MITRE Corporation should not be construed as an official government position, policy, or decision. ii Assessment H (Health Information Technology) Preface Congress enacted and President Obama signed into law the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-146) (“Veterans Choice Act”), as amended by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Expiring Authorities Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-175), to improve access to timely, high-quality health care for Veterans. Under “Title II – Health Care Administrative Matters,” Section 201 calls for an Independent Assessment of 12 areas of VA’s health care delivery systems and management processes. VA engaged the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies to prepare an assessment of access standards and engaged the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Alliance to Modernize Healthcare (CAMH)1 to serve as the program integrator and as primary developer of the remaining 11 Veterans Choice Act independent assessments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Progress Report
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) AREA 4: Secondary Use of EHR Data (SHARPn) Program Annual Progress Report Reporting period: 1/1/2011 – 12/31/2011 Program: AREA 4 - Secondary Use of EHR Data (SHARPn) Award Number: 90TR0002 Prime DUNS: 006471700 Principal Investigators: Christopher Chute, MD, DrPh, Mayo Clinic; Stan Huff, MD, Intermountain Healthcare Program Manager: Lacey Hart, MBA, PMP® Program Background ............................................................................................................. 3 Clinical Data Normalization (DN) ............................................................................................ 4 Clinical Natural Language Processing (cNLP) ........................................................................... 6 High-throughput Phenotyping (HTP) .................................................................................... 10 Infrastructure & Scalability .................................................................................................. 13 Data Quality (DQ) ................................................................................................................ 17 Evaluation Framework ......................................................................................................... 19 Program Outputs ................................................................................................................. 20 Events ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment H (Health Information Technology)
    Prepared by: The MITRE Corporation A Product of the CMS Alliance to Modernize Healthcare Federally Funded Research and Development Center Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Prepared for: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs At the Request of: Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 Section 201: Independent Assessment of the Health Care Delivery Systems and Management Processes of the Department of Veterans Affairs Assessment H (Health Information Technology) September 1, 2015 Prepared by CAMH under: Prime Contract No. HHS-M500-2012-00008I Prime Task Order No. VA118A14F0373 This document was prepared for authorized distribution only. It has not been approved for public release. ©2015 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Assessment H (Health Information Technology) This page intentionally left blank. The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of The MITRE Corporation should not be construed as an official government position, policy, or decision. ii Assessment H (Health Information Technology) Preface Congress enacted and President Obama signed into law the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-146) (“Veterans Choice Act”), as amended by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Expiring Authorities Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-175), to improve access to timely, high-quality health care for Veterans. Under “Title II – Health Care Administrative Matters,” Section 201 calls for an Independent Assessment of 12 areas of VA’s health care delivery systems and management processes. VA engaged the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies to prepare an assessment of access standards and engaged the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Alliance to Modernize Healthcare (CAMH)1 to serve as the program integrator and as primary developer of the remaining 11 Veterans Choice Act independent assessments.
    [Show full text]