Sulfur and Lead Isotope Characteristics of the Greens Creek Polymetallic Massive Sulfide Deposit, Admiralty Island, Southeastern Alaska

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sulfur and Lead Isotope Characteristics of the Greens Creek Polymetallic Massive Sulfide Deposit, Admiralty Island, Southeastern Alaska Sulfur and Lead Isotope Characteristics of the Greens Creek Polymetallic Massive Sulfide Deposit, Admiralty Island, Southeastern Alaska By Cliff D. Taylor, Wayne R. Premo, and Craig A. Johnson Chapter 10 of Geology, Geochemistry, and Genesis of the Greens Creek Massive Sulfide Deposit, Admiralty Island, Southeastern Alaska Edited by Cliff D. Taylor and Craig A. Johnson Professional Paper 1763 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................241 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................241 Regional and District Setting ...................................................................................................................242 Terrane Relationships ......................................................................................................................242 District Geology ..........................................................................................................................................242 Deposit Geology .........................................................................................................................................243 Mine Sequence Nomenclature and Stratigraphy .......................................................................243 Ore Types and Ore Mineralogy ................................................................................................................244 Ore Distribution: Ore-Type Zonation and Metal Zoning .......................................................................245 Previous Sulfur and Lead Isotope Studies ............................................................................................246 Methods.......................................................................................................................................................247 Lead Isotope Analyses .....................................................................................................................247 Sulfur Isotope Analyses ...................................................................................................................247 Isotopic Data...............................................................................................................................................247 Sulfur Isotopes ..................................................................................................................................247 Lead Isotopes ....................................................................................................................................261 Interpretation of Sulfur Isotopes ....................................................................................................271 Interpretation of Lead Isotope Data .......................................................................................................276 Conclusions.................................................................................................................................................280 Acknowledgments .....................................................................................................................................280 References Cited........................................................................................................................................280 Figures 1. Composite stratigraphic column of the Upper Triassic section at the Greens Creek mine, northern Admiralty Island ...................................................................243 2. Plan view map of the Greens Creek mine showing the spatial distribution of major orebodies and major structures .............................................................................245 3. Histogram showing the distribution of all sulfide and sulfate δ34S values obtained from the Greens Creek deposit ..............................................................................248 4. Greens Creek sulfide sulfur isotope data sorted by: (A) mineral texture, (B) mine location, and (C) type of host rock .........................................................................249 5. Comparison of sulfide sulfur isotope data in footwall versus hanging-wall lithologies ...................................................................................................................................260 6. Sulfide sulfur isotope data sorted by mineralogy and ore type ........................................263 7. Sulfide and barite sulfur isotope data from host rocks and occurrences elsewhere on Admiralty Island ...............................................................................................263 8. Plot showing the range of galena lead isotopic compositions from Greens Creek ore and several occurrences on Admiralty Island ..................................................268 9. Plot showing the range of lead isotopic compositions of pyrargyrite and tetrahedrite from Greens Creek ore, and compared to galena from Greens Creek (shaded field) and from several occurrences on Admiralty Island ......................269 10. Plot showing the range of lead isotopic compositions of sphalerite and pyrite from Greens Creek ore, and compared to galena from Greens Creek (shaded field) and from several occurrences on Admiralty Island ..................................270 11. Plot showing the range of lead isotopic compositions of pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, and several ore bands from Greens Creek, and compared to galena from Greens Creek and from several occurrences on Admiralty Island ..................................272 12. Plots showing δ34S versus 207Pb/204Pb and 206Pb/204Pb isotopic data for ores and sulfides in the Greens Creek deposit and for sulfides from Late Triassic and other mineral occurrences on Admiralty Island. .................................................................273 13. Figure showing calculated ranges of various major processes of sulfate reduction compared to the histogram showing the range of all sulfide and sulfate δ34S analyses from the Greens Creek deposit ........................................................275 14. Plot comparing Greens Creek sulfide lead data with initial lead values at 215 Ma for argillites as well as many of the metabasalts and metagabbros of the area, including other Admiralty Island host rock samples, presumably of the same age .........................................................................................................................277 15. Plot (206Pb/204Pb versus 207Pb/204Pb) showing a comparison of the range of Greens Creek lead isotope values to those from other Alaskan VMS deposits of various ages ......279 Tables 1. Greens Creek sulfur isotope data, sample locations, and descriptions for samples from drill core and underground exposures ........................................................252 2. Sulfur isotope data, sample locations, and descriptions for samples from Admiralty Island host rocks and mineral occurrences ......................................................258 3. Uranium-thorium-lead (U-Th-Pb) isotope data, sample locations, and descriptions of ores and sulfide minerals from the Greens Creek mine, and mineral occurrences and host rocks on Admiralty Island .........................................264 Sulfur and Lead Isotope Characteristics of the Greens Creek Polymetallic Massive Sulfide Deposit, Admiralty Island, Southeastern Alaska Cliff D. Taylor, Wayne R. Premo, and Craig A. Johnson Abstract line overlaps the field of Late Triassic age basalts and gabbros. The 207Pb-enriched end is poorly constrained but permissive of Sulfur isotopic analyses were obtained for 221 sulfide lead extraction from the hanging-wall argillites. mineral separates and bulk ore samples and 14 barite separates taken from the mine workings and underground drill core. Also, 55 sulfide mineral separates and 4 barites from mineral occur- Introduction rences and country rock elsewhere on Admiralty Island were analyzed. Pyrite δ34S values span the range –38 to 2 per mil, In this chapter we describe the results of a comprehen- and chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and galena values cluster tightly sive study of the sulfur and lead isotopic characteristics of the between –11 and –16 per mil. Sphalerite-galena mineral pairs Greens Creek ores. We have attempted to sample in such a display consistent isotopic fractionations corresponding to an manner as to allow evaluation of the isotopic variations within equilibrium temperature of about 300 degrees Celsius. Primary- the deposit in a spatial as well as temporal/textural context. textured sulfides are generally more 34S-depleted than recrystal- Thus, we have analyzed all of the major sulfide minerals lized or remobilized sulfides, and the most 34S-enriched values present in the deposit and have obtained a series of footwall occur in the smaller and more distally located orebodies. On a to hanging-wall profiles, primarily in drill core and several deposit scale the most 34S-enriched sulfides are near the footwall underground crosscuts, in each of the six major orebodies of igneous rocks and white siliceous ores. The progression toward the mine. For each analysis the type of ore or host rock has 34S-depleted sulfides roughly follows the ore paragenesis from been noted, as has the primary, recrystallized, or remobilized
Recommended publications
  • Advanced Treatment Processes for Hydrogen Sulfide
    Removing the Stink: Advanced Treatment Processes for Hydrogen Sulfide Clayton Johnson, Christine Owen, Luke Mulford, Shahnawaz Sinha, Zaid Chowdhury, Andre Dieffenthaller, and Andrew Coleman ampa Bay Water supplies drinking The final alternative under considera- water to more than 2 million people in tion is biological oxidation followed by chlo- Clayton Johnson is a project engineer in Tthe greater Tampa Bay and adjacent rination and ultrafiltration following biolog- the Tampa office of the environmental areas. Approximately 60 percent of its source ical oxidation prior to distribution. engineering firm Malcolm Pirnie Inc. water comes from groundwater supplies. This article will discuss preliminary Christine Owen is a water quality assur- ance officer with Tampa Bay Water. Luke Groundwater in some portions of the region findings of this ongoing pilot study, including Mulford is a water quality engineer with has a moderate amount (about 2 mg/L as operational variables and effectiveness of the Hillsborough County Water Resource total sulfides) of hydrogen sulfide. Tampa Bay proposed treatment processes for hydrogen Services. Shahnawaz Sinha is a project Water currently provides water to a water sulfide removal. As many Florida utilities are engineer with Malcolm Pirnie in Phoenix, treatment facility that utilizes aeration fol- faced with the challenge of removing hydro- Arizona. Zaid Chowdhury is a senior lowed by biological oxidation to remove gen sulfide from their groundwater, prelimi- associate with Malcolm Pirnie in Phoenix. hydrogen sulfide. nary results of this study will be broadly Andre Dieffenthaller is a senior associate This combined practice (Figure 1) is applicable. Results from this study will pro- with Malcolm Pirnie in Schaumburg, effective, but there are occasional reductions in vide useful information to water utilities that Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichtj Annual Report 2002
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES AND METHODS 121 PROCESS ENGINEERING CERAMIC MEMBRANES APPLIED FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTES PROCESSING Grażyna Zakrzewska-Trznadel, Marian Harasimowicz, Bogdan Tymiński, Andrzej G. Chmielewski Ceramic membranes (MEMBRALOX® and CeRAM use of different complexing agents are shown in INSIDE®) were used for filtration of liquid radio- Fig.1. Best removal of cobalt, europium and am- active wastes. The experimental runs with samples ericium was observed when chelating polymers of original radioactive wastes were carried out. The NaPAA or PEI were applied. Complexing with poly- waste was characterized by a relatively low salinity acrylic acid of molecular weight 1200 and 8000 did (<1 g/dm3), however, the specific radioactivity not result in sufficient increase of decontamina- was in the medium-level liquid waste range (~150 tion factor. For the membrane of 15 nm pore size, kBq/dm3). The main activity came from radioac- which was used in experiments, the proper molecu- tive cobalt and caesium, but also a significant lar weight of NaPAA was 15 000 or 30 000. In most amount of lanthanides and actinides was present. of experiments the removal of Eu-154 and Am-241 To enhance the separation, membrane filtration was complete (specific activity below the detection was combined with complexation (sole ultrafiltra- limit). Binding the caesium ions with all tested poly- tion gave decontamination factors in the range of mers gave rather poor results. The best complexing 1.1-1.7). Soluble polymers like polyacrylic acid agent for caesium was cobalt hexacyanoferrate, (PAA) derivatives of different average molecular which gave decontamination factors higher than weight, polyethylenimine (PEI) and cyanoferrates 100.
    [Show full text]
  • Platinum-Group Elements and Gold in Sulfide Melts from Modern Arc Basalt (Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Australian National University ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Platinum-group elements and gold in sulfide melts from modern arc basalt (Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka) M. Zelenski, V.S. Kamenetsky, J.A. Mavrogenes, L.V. Danyushevsky, D. Matveev, A.A. Gurenko PII: S0024-4937(17)30290-6 DOI: doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2017.08.012 Reference: LITHOS 4395 To appear in: LITHOS Received date: 30 May 2017 Accepted date: 21 August 2017 Please cite this article as: Zelenski, M., Kamenetsky, V.S., Mavrogenes, J.A., Danyu- shevsky, L.V., Matveev, D., Gurenko, A.A., Platinum-group elements and gold in sul- fide melts from modern arc basalt (Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka), LITHOS (2017), doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2017.08.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Platinum-group elements and gold in sulfide melts from modern arc basalt (Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka) M. Zelenski a, V.S. Kamenetsky a,b,*, J.A. Mavrogenes c, L.V. Danyushevsky b, D. Matveev d, A.A. Gurenko e a Institute of Experimental Mineralogy RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia b Earth Sciences and CODES, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia c Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia d Institute of Solid State Physics RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia e Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques (CRPG), UMR 7358, Université de Lorraine, 54501 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France * Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Determination of Sulfate and Sulfide Sulfur in Rocks Or Minerals
    The Determination of Sulfate and Sulfide Sulfur in Rocks or Minerals By ANGELINA C. VLISIDIS CONTRIBUTIONS TO GEOCHEMISTRY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1214-D UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract_____--__-___-_______-__---____,__-_-__-_---_-_______-_- Dl Introduction. ______________________________________________________ 1 Preparations. _________._.-.__-_-.__.._-_---__----.________._.._____ 2 Standard samples____________________________________________ 2 Reagents. _______________.-_-___-____-__-_-__-_-___-_______-_- 2 Procedure._______________________________________________________ 2 Results__ __________-______-_____----__--_--_----_-_-_-___-___--_ 3 References.._ _____________________________________________________ 5 TABLE Page TABLE 1. Results of sulfide and sulfate sulfur analyses in which varying amounts of a sulfate standard were added to sulfide minerals.. _ D4 m 209-517 66 CONTRIBUTIONS TO GEOCHEMISTRY THE DETERMINATION OF SULFATE AND SULFIDE SULFUR IN ROCKS OR MINERALS By ANGELINA C. VLISEDIS , ABSTRACT A method for the determination of sulfate and sulfide sulfur that occur together in rocks or minerals is presented. All the sulfate sulfur is converted to barium sulfate in an inert atmosphere to prevent oxidation of any sulfide sulfur. Cadmium chloride is added to precipitate any sulfide ion that may be liberated. The sulfate sulfur is then measured indirectly by the determination of the barium and is therefore unaffected by any. subsequent oxidation of the sulfide sulfur.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name: SELENIUM SULFIDE HAZARD SUMMARY
    Common Name: SELENIUM SULFIDE CAS Number: 7446-34-6 RTK Substance number: 1653 DOT Number: UN 2657 Date: October 1995 Revision: October 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- HAZARD SUMMARY * Selenium Sulfide can affect you when breathed in and by * If you think you are experiencing any work-related health passing through your skin. problems, see a doctor trained to recognize occupational * Selenium Sulfide should be handled as a CARCINOGEN- diseases. Take this Fact Sheet with you. -WITH EXTREME CAUTION. * Contact can irritate the eyes with possible eye damage. WORKPLACE EXPOSURE LIMITS * Breathing Selenium Sulfide can irritate the nose and The following exposure limits are for Selenium compounds throat. (measured as Selenium): * High exposure may cause headache, nausea, vomiting, garlic odor of the breath, metallic taste and coated tongue. OSHA: The legal airborne permissible exposure limit * Repeated exposure can cause pallor, nervousness and (PEL) is 0.2 mg/m3 averaged over an 8-hour mood changes. workshift. * Selenium Sulfide may damage the liver and kidneys. NIOSH: The recommended airborne exposure limit is IDENTIFICATION 0.2 mg/m3 averaged over a 10-hour workshift. Selenium Sulfide is a bright orange powder. It is used in medicated shampoos. ACGIH: The recommended airborne exposure limit is 3 0.2 mg/m averaged over an 8-hour workshift. REASON FOR CITATION * Selenium Sulfide is on the Hazardous Substance List * Selenium Sulfide may be a CARCINOGEN in humans. because it is regulated by OSHA and cited by ACGIH, There may be no safe level of exposure to a carcinogen, so DOT, NIOSH, NTP, DEP, HHAG and EPA. all contact should be reduced to the lowest possible level.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Sulfide Public Health Statement
    PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT Hydrogen Sulfide Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences December 2016 This Public Health Statement summarizes what is known about hydrogen sulfide such as possible health effects from exposure and what you can do to limit exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identifies the most serious hazardous waste sites in the nation. These sites make up the National Priorities List (NPL) and are sites targeted for long-term federal clean-up activities. U.S. EPA has found hydrogen sulfide in at least 34 of the 1,832 current or former NPL sites. The total number of NPL sites evaluated for hydrogen sulfide is not known. But the possibility remains that as more sites are evaluated, the sites at which hydrogen sulfide is found may increase. This information is important because these future sites may be sources of exposure, and exposure to hydrogen sulfide may be harmful. If you are exposed to hydrogen sulfide, many factors determine whether you’ll be harmed. These include how much you are exposed to (dose), how long you are exposed (duration), and how you are exposed (route of exposure). You must also consider the other chemicals you are exposed to and your age, sex, diet, family traits, lifestyle, and state of health. WHAT IS HYDROGEN SULFIDE? Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a flammable, colorless gas that smells like rotten eggs. People usually can smell hydrogen sulfide at low concentrations in air, ranging from 0.0005 to 0.3 parts hydrogen sulfide per million parts of air (ppm). At high concentrations, a person might lose their ability to smell it.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetics of the Ozonation of Dimethyl Sulfide in the Gas Phase
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1973 Kinetics of the ozonation of dimethyl sulfide in the gas phase Robert John Moody The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Moody, Robert John, "Kinetics of the ozonation of dimethyl sulfide in the gas phase" (1973). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8125. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8125 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KINETICS OF THE OZONATION OF DIMETHYL SOLFIDB IN THE GAS PHASE by Robert J, Moody B.S., University of Montana, 1968 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1973 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners Deanf 'Graduait Schoo Date 7 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP38926 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Sulfide Fact Sheet
    Hydrogen Sulfide Fact Sheet What is hydrogen sulfide? Hydrogen sulfide (H 2S) occurs naturally in crude petroleum, natural gas, volcanic gases, and hot springs. It can also result from bacterial breakdown of organic matter. It is also produced by human and animal wastes. Bacteria found in your mouth and gastrointestinal tract produce hydrogen sulfide from bacteria decomposing materials that contain vegetable or animal proteins. Hydrogen sulfide can also result from industrial activities, such as food processing, coke ovens, kraft paper mills, tanneries, and petroleum refineries. Hydrogen sulfide is a flammable, colorless gas with a characteristic odor of rotten eggs. It is commonly known as hydrosulfuric acid, sewer gas, and stink damp. People can smell it at low levels. What happens to hydrogen sulfide when it enters the environment? • Hydrogen sulfide is released primarily as a gas and spreads in the air. • Hydrogen sulfide remains in the atmosphere for about 18 hours. • When released as a gas, it will change into sulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid. • In some instances, it may be released as a liquid waste from an industrial facility. How might I be exposed to hydrogen sulfide? • You may be exposed to hydrogen sulfide from breathing contaminated air or drinking contaminated water. • Individuals living near a wastewater treatment plant, a gas and oil drilling operation, a farm with manure storage or livestock confinement facilities, or a landfill may be exposed to higher levels of hydrogen sulfide. • You can be exposed at work if you work in the rayon textiles, petroleum and natural gas drilling and refining, or wastewater treatment industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxidation of Sulfide Minerals. V. Galena, Sphalerite and Chalcogite
    Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 18,pp. 365-372(1980) OXIDATIONOF SULFIDEMINERALS. V. GALENA,SPHALERITE AND CHALCOGITE H.F. STEGBR eup L.E. DESJARDINS Mineral SciencesLaboratories, Canada Centre lor Mineral and Energy Technology, Department ol Energy, Mines and Resources,Ottawa, Ontaio KIA OGI AssrRecr long-term stability of sulfide-bearing ores and concentrates.Part of this study was concerned Samples of galena, sphalerite and cbalcocite were with the nature of the products and kinetics of oxidized at 52oC and, 68Vo of relative humidity the oxidation of the commonly encountered periods to five weeks, and the prqd- in air for up sulfide minerals. The oxidation of pyrite, chal- for metal and sulfur-bearing ucts were analyzed pyrrhotite at 52oC and, 687o of. species. Galena is. oxidized to PbSOa, sphalerite copyrite and (RH) has already been in- to ZnSO. * FezO, if iron-bearing, and chalcocite relative humidity to CuO and CuS. The oxidation of galena and vestigated (Steger & Desjardins 1978). This re- sphalerite proceeds according to a linear rate potr summarizes the results of the study 9f tle law: that of chalcocite leads to the formation of a bxidation of galena, sphalerite and chalcocite coherent product layer impenetrable to Oz and HrO under the same conditions. vapor. The air oxidation of galena at relatively low without Keywords: air oxidation, oxidation products, sul- temperatures has been investigated fide minerals, galena, sphalerite, chalcocite. reaching a consensuson the nature of the oxida- tion product. Hagihara (1952), using a re- Sourvrlrnp flection electron-diffraction technique, and Kirkwood & Nutting (1965), using a trans- Nous avons 6tudi6 I'oxydation dans I'air d'6chan- mission electron-diffraction technique, found tillons de galdne, de sphal6rite et de chalcocite i this product to be PbSOo,whereas Leia et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Hydrogen Sulfide from Landfills
    Fact Sheet: Hydrogen Sulfide from Landfills How might I be exposed to hydrogen sulfide from a landfill? Hydrogen sulfide is a flammable, colorless gas with a characteristic odor of rotten eggs. It is heavier than air and is commonly known as hydrosulfuric acid, sewer gas, and stink damp. Hydrogen sulfide occurs both naturally and from industrial processes. Hydrogen sulfide can be released from landfills and people living near landfills may be exposed to it by breathing it in. How can hydrogen sulfide affect my health? Exposure to low concentrations within the range of 30 parts of hydrogen sulfide in one billion parts of air (ppb) may cause irritation to the eyes, nose, or throat. It may also cause difficulty breathing for some individuals with respiratory problems, such as asthmatics. DOH uses the Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) developed by the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to assess the possibility of non-cancer health effects. An MRL is an estimate of the daily human exposure to a hazardous substance, at or below which, that substance is unlikely to pose a measurable risk of adverse, non-cancer health effects. These particular values have many safety factors built in and the actual levels where health effects would be observed are much higher. The acute MRL, which represents short time periods of exposure (less than 15 days), is 70 ppb. Per the study that established this acute MRL, it should be noted that the actual level where health effects (respiratory problems and headaches) were observed was 2,000 ppb. The intermediate MRL is defined for exposure periods of 15 to 365 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways for Neoarchean Pyrite Formation Constrained by Mass
    Pathways for Neoarchean pyrite formation constrained SPECIAL FEATURE by mass-independent sulfur isotopes James Farquhara,b,1, John Cliffb, Aubrey L. Zerklec, Alexey Kamyshnyd, Simon W. Poultone, Mark Clairef, David Adamsb, and Brian Harmsa aDepartment of Geology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; bCentre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; cSchool of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom; dDepartment of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel; eSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; and fSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom Edited by Mark H. Thiemens, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved December 28, 2012 (received for review November 1, 2012) It is generally thought that the sulfate reduction metabolism is range of variability for Δ33S is significantly greater in samples older ancient and would have been established well before the Neo- than ∼2.4 Ga than in younger samples (e.g., compilation in refs. archean. It is puzzling, therefore, that the sulfur isotope record of 4 and 5). This observation has been linked to the production, the Neoarchean is characterized by a signal of atmospheric mass- transfer, and preservation of mass-independent sulfur isotope independent chemistry rather than a strong overprint by sulfate signals (presumably of atmospheric origin) early in Earth history. reducers. Here, we present a study of the four sulfur isotopes The production of this signal in the atmosphere and its subsequent obtained using secondary ion MS that seeks to reconcile a number transfer to the Earth surface is sensitive to atmospheric O2 levels of features seen in the Neoarchean sulfur isotope record.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple and Reliable Method Reducing Sulfate to Sulfide For
    A simple and reliable method reducing sulfate to sulfide for multiple sulfur isotope analysis Lei Geng, Joel Savarino, Clara Savarino, Nicolas Caillon, Pierre Cartigny, Shohei Hattori, Sakiko Ishino, | Naohiro Yoshida To cite this version: Lei Geng, Joel Savarino, Clara Savarino, Nicolas Caillon, Pierre Cartigny, et al.. A simple and reliable method reducing sulfate to sulfide for multiple sulfur isotope analysis. Rapid Communications inMass Spectrometry, Wiley, 2017, 32 (4), pp.333-341. 10.1002/rcm.8048. insu-02187037 HAL Id: insu-02187037 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-02187037 Submitted on 17 Jul 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Received: 12 October 2017 Revised: 5 December 2017 Accepted: 9 December 2017 DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8048 RESEARCH ARTICLE A simple and reliable method reducing sulfate to sulfide for multiple sulfur isotope analysis Lei Geng1 | Joel Savarino1 | Clara A. Savarino1,2 | Nicolas Caillon1 | Pierre Cartigny3 | Shohei Hattori4 | Sakiko Ishino4 | Naohiro Yoshida4,5 1 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Institut des Rationale: Precise analysis of four sulfur isotopes of sulfate in geological and environmental Géosciences de l'Environnement, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France samples provides the means to extract unique information in wide geological contexts.
    [Show full text]