State Societyand Governancein Melanesia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State Societyand Governancein Melanesia View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Australian National University Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies State, Society and Governance in Melanesia StateSociety and in Governance Melanesia DISCUSSION PAPER Discussion Paper 2008/10 COURTS AND COUPS IN FIJI: THE 2008 HIGH COURT JUDGMENT IN QARASE V BAINIMARAMA INTRODUCTION not provided for in the constitution, and that GEORGE ‘exceptional circumstances existed’ because WILLIAMS On 21st October 2008, the State, Society ‘the stability of the State was endangered’. & Governance in Melanesia Program held a The decision effectively legitimised the interim GRAHAM workshop entitled Courts and Coups; Fiji’s government that had emerged in the wake of LEUNG October 2008 High Court Judgment in the Fiji’s December 5 2006 military coup. Qarase v Bainimarama Case. This brought together George Williams, the Anthony In the first of the four papers included ANTHONY J. Mason Professor in the Faculty of Law at here, Professor George Williams, who REGAN the University of New South Wales, Graham served as Counsel in the 2001 Chandrika Leung, the Managing Partner of Howards Prasad case - which ruled the government JON Lawyers in Suva, as well as Anthony Regan that arose after Fiji’s 2000 coup to be illegal FRAENKEL and Jon Fraenkel from the State, Society - discusses the precedents set by that earlier & Governance in Melanesia Program at case, and how these were dealt with by the ANU. The meeting was chaired by Duncan Fiji judges in 2008. In the second paper, Kerr, Australia’s Parliamentary Secretary for Graham Leung, a lawyer who practises in Fiji Pacific Affairs. and was formerly Chairman of the Electoral Commission, discusses the changing role The objective of the workshop was to of the judiciary in Fiji. In the third paper, discuss a judgment by Fiji’s High Court Anthony Regan considers whether the 2008 on 9th October 2008 which found that the Fiji Court ruling was, as it claimed to be, a President’s actions in appointing an interim purposive interpretation of Fiji’s constitution, cabinet in January 2007, and in continuing to and examines the scope for presidential rule by decree in the wake of Fiji’s December exercise of prerogative powers granted by 5th 2006 coup, ‘were valid and are held to the 1997 constitution. In the final paper, Jon be lawful’. The judges declared that Fiji’s Fraenkel examines the political context of the President held certain ‘prerogative powers’ 2008 judgment and its likely consequences. Courts and Coups in Fiji: The 2008 High Court Judgement in Qarase v Bainimarama QARASE V BAINIMARAMA AND the rule of law and the existing legal order, 2 THE RULE OF law IN FIJI and, therefore, cannot be applied to uphold the legality of a new revolutionary regime. The latter can only be achieved under the George Williams doctrine of ‘effectiveness’. According to FM Brookfield, a leading writer in this field: On 29 May 2000, the Commander of the the power of a Head of State under a Fiji Military Forces issued a decree abrogating written Constitution extends by implication the 1997 Fijian Constitution (the Constitution). to executive acts, and also to legislative Nine months later on 1 March 2001, the acts taken temporarily (that is, until Court of Appeal of Fiji in Republic of Fiji v confirmed, varied or disallowed by the Prasad upheld an earlier High Court decision lawful Legislature) to preserve or restore the that the 1997 Fiji Constitution remained in Constitution, even though the Constitution force as the supreme law of Fiji. Immediately itself contains no express warrant for them. after the decision, the Prime Minister of (Brookfield, 1988, p. 47). the Interim Civilian Government, which had been installed by the Fiji Military Forces, This construction of the necessity doctrine stated that the nation would be returned to is consistent with decisions of the Supreme democratic rule under the Constitution. Court of Pakistan (Bhutto v Chief of Army These events, centring upon the decision Staff 1977 p. 723, 728, 753; Zafar Ali Shah of the Court of Appeal, were an important v Pervez Musharraf 2000 p.1160-1161 per landmark in the history of the common law. It Irshad Hasan Khan CJ), where it has been was the first, and so far as I am aware the still held that emergency action cannot be taken the only, time that the leaders of a coup d’etât under the principle of necessity in order to voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction of a subvert the existing constitutional structure court only months after a takeover. It is also (See also Texas v White, 1862 p.733 per the first time that a court decision restored a Chase CJ; Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke Constitution, and the democratic system of 1968 p. 441 per Fieldsend AJA; Mokotso v government created by it. By contrast, the HM King Moshoeshow II 1989 p. 122 per October 2008 High Court of Fiji judgment in Cullinan CJ). Hence, the doctrine cannot Qarase v Bainimarama gave legal recognition authorise the abrogation of the existing legal to an otherwise unlawful usurper. order, only its temporary suspension. In the context of the 2000 coup in Fiji, the necessity doctrine was applied by Justice Necessity and Effectiveness and the Gates of the High Court (in Prasad v Republic Prasad Litigation of Fiji 2001 p.665) to find that actions of the When asked to determine the legality of a President of Fiji and the Commander of the coup or coup-like events, courts usually use Fijian Military could be regarded as lawful one of two alternative analytical methods, insofar as they were designed to resolve called necessity and effectiveness. There the hostage crisis and to uphold the 1997 is no reference to either doctrine in the text Constitution. Justice Gates’ preparedness of the 1997 Fiji Constitution, but, as in other to apply the doctrine was based upon his constitutional systems (see, for example, finding that there had been no genuine desire Attorney-General v Ibrahim 1964), the on the part of the Commander to abrogate necessity doctrine at least was seen by the the 1997 Constitution: Fijian courts in Prasad as being necessarily implied into the instrument as a means of Commodore Bainimarama is clearly no ensuring its preservation. usurper. Having acted as he thought best in a temporary but dire hostage crisis, he Courts have recognised a principle of handed over power to a civilian caretaker necessity that dictates that, in times of extreme administration. Necessity would permit him crisis, emergency action may validly be taken to suspend the Constitution just for so long that would otherwise be illegal. Such action, as to allow him to free the hostages and to including a declaration of martial law, must restore law and order. That concluded his be a transient and proportionate response to role. the crisis. It may be invoked only to uphold Courts and Coups in Fiji: The 2008 High Court Judgement in Qarase v Bainimarama Gates ordered that ‘[t]he revocation of the urged on behalf of Prasad, namely, whether 1997 Constitution was not made within the the new regime acknowledges basic human 3 doctrine of necessity and such revocation rights as evidenced by international obligations was unconstitutional and of no effect’ and assumed by the nation (Robertson, et al, ‘[t]he Parliament of Fiji, consisting of the 2001p.151). President, the Senate, and the House of On the evidence before it, the Court Representatives, is still in being.’ He stated held that the effectiveness test was not that ‘the military is invited and recommended satisfied for two reasons. First, there was a by the court to ensure a smooth and amicable rival government striving for power. Affidavits hand over of Government to that which had been filed by former Prime Minister will soon be chosen by the incoming Prime Chaudhry and by members of his Cabinet Minister’. that claimed that the Peoples Coalition was ‘ready and willing’ to resume office under By contrast, under the effectiveness the 1997 Constitution. Second, although doctrine a court exercises a supra- the Interim Civilian Government was able to constitutional jurisdiction in determining demonstrate the continuing operation of the whether a revolution or coup ought to be administration of government throughout the given legal recognition in place of the deposed attempted coup and its aftermath, this was political order. The idea is that if a coup is insufficient to prove popular acceptance and effective, it ought to be given recognition on support for the Interim Civilian Government. the basis that there is no practical point in The Court found that ‘passive compliance doing otherwise. One test for determining is hardly a persuasive indication of true effectiveness was set out by Cullinan CJ of acquiescence in a government which has the High Court of Lesotho in Mokotso v HM been in power for only about seven months King Moshoeshow II (1989 p. 133): and severely restricts public protest’. A court may hold a revolutionary government to be lawful, and its acts to have been legitimated ab initio, where it is satisfied The Decision in Qarase v Bainimarama that (a) the government is firmly established, This case arose out of the December there being no other government in 2006 military take-over of Fiji. The previous opposition thereto; and (b) the government’s 18 months had been characterised by administration is effective, in that the increasing ill-will and conflict between the majority of the people are behaving, by and Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF) and large, in conformity therewith. Government of Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase over matters such as: In the earlier decision of Mitchell v Director of Public Prosecutions (1986 p.
Recommended publications
  • Mccoskar and Nadan V. State, High Court of Fiji at Suva
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL CASE NOS.: HAA0085 & 86 OF 2005 BETWEEN: DHIRENDRA NADAN THOMAS MCCOSKAR Appellant AND: STATE Respondent Counsel: Ms. N. Khan - for both Appellants Mr. K. Tunidau –for the State Dr. S. Shameem – for Human Rights Commission Ms D. Herman – for Human Rights Commission Ms S. Tabaiwalu – for Attorney-General Ms M.R. Vuniwaqa – for Attorney-General Dates of Hearing: 15th, 16th and 17th August, 2005 (in Suva) Date of Judgment: 26th August, 2005 (in Lautoka) JUDGMENT Introduction The criminal law has at times tried to keep the powerful forces of sexual expression in check. Some such laws are absolutely necessary; to protect children and the vulnerable against sexual exploitation or corruption and to protect adults from unwanted approaches by sexual predators. In most societies these necessary laws have found their limits in a citizens right to privacy and equality. In this appeal the court is urged to find and declare some limits for the prosecution, conviction and sentencing of two homosexuals engaged in consensual, intimate, private but criminal conduct. Background Mr. McCoskar was a tourist in the country from Melbourne, Australia. He arrived on the 20th of March 2005 for a holiday and met up with the second appellant Mr. Nadan. They stayed together as partners. At the end of his vacation, on the 3rd of April, Mr. McCoskar suspected that Mr. 1 Nadan had stolen AUD$1500.00 from him during their time together. He lodged a complaint with the police, checked in at international departures and went to board his flight home.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Fiji Handbook
    Parliament of Fiji Handbook Message from the Speaker The Fijian Parliament resumed its work in October 2014 following an election held in September 2014. The Constitution of the Republic of Fiji outlines the role and functions of the Parliament in Fiji’s system of governance. At one of its first sittings, the Parliament of Fiji adopted the Parliament’s Standing Orders that outline in detail the way that the Parliament operates. This Handbook is not designed to be an exhaustive, technical compendium of parliamentary procedure as we already have this in the Parliament of Fiji Standing Orders. The purpose of this Handbook is to provide a brief overview of the Parliament and it is designed for the use of all citizens. The Handbook aims to provide an introductory and straightforward description of the Parliament as an institution, the parliamentary context and the main jobs of Parliament and parliamentarians. This is a first edition, and the Handbook will be updated periodically, not least because it should be the intention of every Parliament to undergo a process of continual improvement. In developing this handbook, I am thankful to the senior Parliament staff who have provided expert technical input and the UNDP Fiji Parliament Support Project for their support in developing this important publication. Hon. Dr Jiko Luveni October 2016 Table of Contents A. Roles & Responsibilities 1 i) Rights & Responsibilities of MPs 1 Rights 1 Responsibilities 2 ii) Key Actors in Parliament 4 B. Passing a Law 6 i) Development of a Bill 6 Bill Originating from the Government 6 Bills Originating from MPs 7 ii) Stages of a Bill in Parliament 9 Introduction 9 2nd Reading 10 Standing Committee 11 Committee of the Whole Parliament on Bills 12 3rd Reading 14 Coming into Force 14 C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Country Review
    Fiji 2016 Country Review http://www.countrywatch.com Table of Contents Chapter 1 1 Country Overview 1 Country Overview 2 Key Data 4 Fiji 5 Pacific Islands 6 Chapter 2 8 Political Overview 8 History 9 Political Conditions 10 Political Risk Index 42 Political Stability 57 Freedom Rankings 72 Human Rights 84 Government Functions 87 Government Structure 92 Principal Government Officials 100 Leader Biography 101 Leader Biography 101 Foreign Relations 104 National Security 109 Defense Forces 111 Chapter 3 114 Economic Overview 114 Economic Overview 115 Nominal GDP and Components 117 Population and GDP Per Capita 118 Real GDP and Inflation 119 Government Spending and Taxation 120 Money Supply, Interest Rates and Unemployment 121 Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate 122 Data in US Dollars 123 Energy Consumption and Production Standard Units 124 Energy Consumption and Production QUADS 125 World Energy Price Summary 126 CO2 Emissions 127 Agriculture Consumption and Production 128 World Agriculture Pricing Summary 130 Metals Consumption and Production 131 World Metals Pricing Summary 133 Economic Performance Index 134 Chapter 4 146 Investment Overview 146 Foreign Investment Climate 147 Foreign Investment Index 151 Corruption Perceptions Index 164 Competitiveness Ranking 175 Taxation 184 Stock Market 184 Partner Links 185 Chapter 5 186 Social Overview 186 People 187 Human Development Index 188 Life Satisfaction Index 192 Happy Planet Index 203 Status of Women 213 Global Gender Gap Index 215 Culture and Arts 225 Etiquette 227 Travel Information 228 Diseases/Health Data 237 Chapter 6 243 Environmental Overview 243 Environmental Issues 244 Environmental Policy 252 Greenhouse Gas Ranking 253 Global Environmental Snapshot 264 Global Environmental Concepts 275 International Environmental Agreements and Associations 289 Appendices 314 Bibliography 315 Fiji Chapter 1 Country Overview Fiji Review 2016 Page 1 of 327 pages Fiji Country Overview FIJI Fiji became independent in 1970 after nearly a century as a British colony.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 EXPLANATORY NOTE This Is the Report of the Commonwealth
    EXPLANATORY NOTE This is the Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group which was present for the General Election in Fiji Islands, held from 6 to 13 May 2006. The Group’s report is reproduced here in the form in which it was signed by the Observers prior to their departure from Suva on 21 May 2006. It was transmitted to the Commonwealth Secretary- General on Friday 2 June 2006. During the following week he sent it to the Prime Minister of Fiji Islands, the Chairman of the Electoral Commission, the Supervisor of Elections, the leaders of the main political parties and Commonwealth governments. It was placed on this web-site and released to the media on Monday 12 June 2006. Printed copies are available from: Democracy Section Political Affairs Division Commonwealth Secretariat Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 747 6407/6397/6398 Fax: +44 207 930 2189 • Please note that the page numbers shown on the contents page relate to the printed version of the report. Only Annexes II and IV are shown. The others will be added at a later date. 1 Fiji Islands General Election 6-13 May 2006 REPORT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OBSERVER GROUP 2 CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1 Invitation 1 Terms of Reference 1 Activities of the Group 2 CHAPTER TWO – POLITICAL BACKGROUND 4 Brief Historical Background 4 Political Overview 4 The Development of the 1997 Constitution 5 1999 Elections 6 2000 George Speight Coup 6 Commonwealth Engagement 7 2001 Election and Section 99 (5) of the Constitution 7 Talanoa Process 8 CMAG Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Report
    ACP-EU JOINT PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY BUREAU 17 September 2012 REPORT OF THE FACT-FINDING MISSION OF THE ACP-EU JPA BUREAU TO FIJI 22 TO 24 JULY 2012 Musikari KOMBO, EGH, MP (Kenya), Co-President, Head of Delegation Michèle RIVASI, MEP (Greens/EFA, France), Vice-President and Co-President a.i, Head of Delegation and Lenata‟i Victor Faafoi TAMAPUA (Samoa), Vice-President Benedict Glen NOEL (Grenada), Vice-President Frank ENGEL, MEP (EPP, Luxembourg), Member CR\913035EN.doc AP101.253/BUR EN 1 EN Introduction At its meeting of 27 May 2012, the Bureau of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly decided to send a fact-find mission to Fiji to assess the progress made by the authorities to return the country to constitutional order and parliamentary democracy. The mission was undertaken from 22 to 24 July 2012 and held extensive and open discussions with Government Representatives and a wide range of political stakeholders, leaders of Political Parties and the two previous Prime Ministers, as well as civil society and non-state actor representatives. Brief historical background to the current Fiji political crisis The current political crisis in Fiji can be traced back to the ethnic make-up of the population, which is divided between indigenous Fijians and Indo-Fijians (the descendants of indentured labourers brought from India a century ago). At independence, Indo-Fijians were roughly 51% of the population until the mid-2000s, by which time political issues had prompted thousands of Indo-Fijians to leave the country. They currently make up 39% of the population. For 17 years after independence from British rule in 1970, the country was relatively stable until Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka‟s 1987 coup against an Indo-Fijian dominated government.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court 3 R- ( , CHAPTER 13 SUPREME COURT
    Cap. 13 Ed. 1978 Supreme Court 3 r- ( , CHAPTER 13 SUPREME COURT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I-PRELIMINARY SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Name of Court and general jurisdiction. 4. Seal of Court. PART II-CONSTITUTION OF THE COURT 5. Constitution of Court. 6. Powers of judges. 7. Precedence of judges. PART III-OFFICERS OF THE COURT 8. Officers. 9. Duties of Chief Registrar. 10. When Chief Registrar unable to perform his duties. 11. Magistrate to act as Chief Registrar in certain cases. 12. Powers of Deputy Registrar or District Registrar. PART IV-FUNDS IN COURT 13. Funds in Court. 14. Moneys to be held in trust. 15. Liability of Consolidated Fund. 16. Rules. PART V-SHERIFF AND ADMIRALTY MARSHAL 17. Appointment and duties of Sheriff and Admiralty Marshal. PART VI-JURISDICTION 18. Court to have jurisdiction of High Court of Justice in England. 19. In probate, divorce and matrimonial causes. 20. Power to appoint guardians and committees. 21. Admiralty jurisdiction of Court. 4 Supreme Court Cap. 13 Ed. 1978 PART VII-IMPERIAL LAWS 22. What imperial laws to be in force. 23. Practice. 24. Imperial laws to be subject to Fiji jurisdiction and Acts. PART VIII-RULES 25. Power to make rules. PART IX-MISCELLANEOUS ""') 26. Sittings of the Court. 27. Delivery of judgments and orders. 28. Vacations. 29. Expenses of witnesses in civil proceedings. 30. Expenses of witnesses in criminal proceedings. 31. Mode of trial in civil causes. 32. Power to impose charge on land of judgment debtors. SUPREME COURT Ordinances Nos. 14 of 1875,9 of 1883,7 of 1893,9 of 1899,1 of 1904,8 of 1904,7 of 1909,7 of 1910, 13 of 1916, 5 of 1920, 4 of 1924, 19 of 1929,5 of 1930, 32 0[1930, 19 of1931 , 290f1932, 23 of 1937,3 of 1940,30 of 1940,21 of 1944,2 of 1945,3 of 1945, 19 of 1951,44 of 1960, 8 of 1961,37 of 1961, 23 of 1965, 35 of 1965, 27 of 1966, Order, 31st Jan., 1967, 7th Oct., 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case That Stopped the Coup? the Rule of Law in Fiji
    1 THE CASE THAT STOPPED A COUP? THE RULE OF LAW IN FIJI George Williams Anthony Mason Professor and Director Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law Faculty of Law University of New South Wales THIS IS A TRANSCRIPT OF THE 2003 QUENTIN-BAXTER MEMORIAL TRUST LECTURE DELIVERED AT THE LAW SCHOOL OF VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON ON 27 NOVEMBER 2003. 2 I INTRODUCTION∗ I appreciate the privilege of addressing you today. As a scholar at Victoria University of Wellington, Professor Quentin-Baxter recognised something that is only becoming fully apparent today. That is the idea, reflected in his own academic work and public service, that it is not only possible, but necessary to bridge the divide that is often imagined between the fields of international and constitutional law. I am also delighted to be giving this lecture because it deals with a subject to which Mrs Alison Quentin- Baxter, as a constitutional and international lawyer, has made a distinguished contribution. That subject is the development of legal institutions and the strengthening of the rule of law in the Pacific. Mrs Quentin-Baxter was Counsel assisting the Fiji Constitution Review Committee that was instrumental in drafting Fiji’s multi-racial 1997 Constitution.1 My lecture today concerns that Constitution and the events that overtook it. On 29 May 2000, the Commander of the Fiji Military Forces issued a decree abrogating the 1997 Fijian Constitution. Nine months later on 1 March 2001, the Court of Appeal of Fiji held in Republic of Fiji v Prasad2 that the 1997 Constitution remains in force as the supreme law of Fiji.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiefly Leadership in Fiji After the 2014 Elections Stephanie Lawson
    3 Chiefly leadership in Fiji after the 2014 elections Stephanie Lawson ‘Chiefdoms are highly variable, but they are all about power.’ (Earle 2011, p. 27) Introduction The last quarter century has seen a significant decline of chiefly influence in Fiji’s politics, albeit with some periods of enhanced status for the paramount symbol of indigenous Fijian traditionalism, the Great Council of Chiefs (GCC). This body, however, was abolished by decree under the military regime of Commodore Josaia Voreqe (Frank) Bainimarama in March 2012. The September 2014 elections held prospects for the restoration of chiefly authority and the role of traditionalism through the Social Democratic Liberal Party (SODELPA) led by Ro Teimumu Vuikaba Kepa, holder of a prominent chiefly title. A victory by SODELPA would also have seen the restoration of the GCC. With SODELPA’s resounding defeat by Bainimarama’s FijiFirst Party, such prospects have received a significant blow. This chapter provides an account of chiefly leadership in national politics, beginning with a survey of Fiji’s colonisation, the role of chiefs in the British colonial regime generally, and their domination 41 THE PEOPLE Have SPOKEN of national politics up until 1987. The second section reviews the political dynamics surrounding chiefly leadership from 1987 until the Bainimarama-led coup of 2006. The final sections examine chiefly involvement in national politics in the lead-up to the 2014 elections and prospects for the future of traditional chiefly political leadership which, given the results, look somewhat bleak. British colonialism and chiefly rule In contrast with many other parts of the world, where colonial rule was imposed by force, the paramount chiefs of Fiji petitioned the British to establish a Crown Colony.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Fiji at Lautoka Appellate Jurisdiction
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT LAUTOKA APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No. HAA 0083 of 2001 (C. P. No. 0001 of 2001L). NAUSHAD ALl v STATE G.P. Shankar for the Appellant D. Prasad for the state Dr. S Shameem, Mr. Ratuvili & Ms D. Sudhakar, for the Proceedings Commissioner, Fiji Human Rights Commission, (Amicus Curiae) Date of Hearing: 1 November 2001 Date of Judgment: 21 March 2002 JUDGMENT Introduction The Appellant appeared before the Ba Magistrates Court on 16 August 2001. He was charged with one Count of Unnatural Offence -contrary to section 175 of the Penal Code. The particulars alleged that: "Naushad Ali s/o Mohammed Ali between January, 2000 to the 14th day of August 2001 at Korovuto, Ba in the Western Division had carnal Knowledge of Banu Farnaz Bano d/o Naushad Ali against the order of nature. He pleaded guilty. The facts were read out and also tendered in writing. The medical report on the victim was tendered. The Appellant's caution interview, in Hindi, and translation were also tendered. The appellant admitted the facts. The learned Magistrate convicted the appellant. The Appellant was a first offender. The appellant spoke briefly in mitigation. The learned Magistrate sentenced him to 5 years imprisonment. He further ordered 6 strokes of corporal punishment subject to confirmation by the High Court. The Officer-in-Charge of the Ba Magistrates Court, via memo dated 20/08/01, sent the relevant Criminal rile together with 2 certified copies of the record for confirmation of Corporal Punishment. The matter was first called before this Court on 31/08/0 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanesia in Review: Issues and Events, 2002
    Melanesia in Review: Issues and Events, 2002 Reviews of West Papua and Solomon mined, circumvented and ignored by Islands are not included in this issue. the highest in the land including those who were sworn in to uphold it” Fiji (Times, 19 May, 10). During the final The political and economic highlights months of 2002, the Fiji Labour Party in Fiji in 2002 have again brought and some quasi-political civil society into sharp focus a lesson painfully movements like the Citizens Constitu- learned after the 1987 military coups: tional Forum (ccf) questioned why it takes years to recover from the neg- some members of Parliament had been ative ramifications of any national permitted to continue serving in Prime political upheaval. The economic and Minister Qarase’s cabinet despite sociopolitical fallout of the May 2000 videotaped evidence of their close civilian coup in Fiji continued to involvement in the May 2000 civilian impact major events in both the uprising. The extensive video footage politico-legal and economic domains of siege activities at the Veiuto Parlia- of the nation during the year. The mentary Complex emerged during the path to economic recovery and socio- first treason trial of Josefa Nata and political normalcy was generally shaky Timoci Silatolu, which commenced on and fraught with difficulties. The local 26 November and featured deposed tabloids regularly featured major Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry scams within the civil service, exacer- as a key state witness (Post, 27 Nov, bated by gross fiscal mismanagement 2; Times, 29 Nov, 1). Following the by the state and a general lack of 14 November conviction of fifteen political goodwill between the major former Counter Revolutionary War- political parties—the ruling Soqosoqo fare Unit soldiers who had been found Duavata ni Lewenivanua (sdl) and guilty of the November 2000 mutiny the opposition Fiji Labour Party (flp).
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Fragments from a Fiji Coup Diary
    DIVERSITY, IDENTITY AND THE MEDIA 5. Fragments from a Fiji coup diary ABSTRACT Fiji has endured four coups in the past 22 years. On 10 April 2009, President Ratu Josefa Iloilo suspended the Constitution, sacked the judi- ciary, postponed any general election until 2014 and appointed himself as head of state. He reinstated 2006 coup leader Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama as interim Prime Minister, who in turn reappointed his cabi- net in defiance of international condemnation. A censorship crackdown on the media and civil society followed. The author is a media educator and journalist who worked for a total of 11 years at the University of the South Pacific, including experiencing both the 2000 and the 2006 coups. He later returned to Fiji as social media educator for the National Council for Building a Better Fiji (NCBBF). The Council was critical of the media during the period it developed a draft of the People’s Charter. It recom- mended changes to the law to establish a Media Tribunal, which was also planned to encourage qualified local personnel for editorial, subeditorial and publisher positions; provide a wide diversity of local programmes for television media and develop community radio and community television through a media tax. While the People’s Charter was seen as a neces- sary and constructive contribution to the future of Fiji, the leadership of Bainimarama was questioned after the repeal of the constitution. This arti- cle, opening with the author’s open letter to Bainimarama after the Easter putsch, offers reflections from a coup diary. PATRICK CRADDOCK Media educator, New Zealand AN open letter to the interim regime leader of the Republic of Fiji: ear Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama, So—only good news can be reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Constitutional Courts: Foreign Judges on National Constitutional Courts
    Hybrid Constitutional Courts: Foreign Judges on National Constitutional Courts ROSALIND DIXON* & VICKI JACKSON** Foreign judges play an important role in deciding constitutional cases in the appellate courts of a range of countries. Comparative constitutional scholars, however, have to date paid limited attention to the phenomenon of “hybrid” constitutional courts staffed by a mix of local and foreign judges. This Article ad- dresses this gap in comparative constitutional schol- arship by providing a general framework for under- standing the potential advantages and disadvantages of hybrid models of constitutional justice, as well as the factors likely to inform the trade-off between these competing factors. Building on prior work by the au- thors on “outsider” models of constitutional interpre- tation, it suggests that the hybrid constitutional mod- el’s attractiveness may depend on answers to the following questions: Why are foreign judges appoint- ed to constitutional courts—for what historical and functional reasons? What degree of local democratic support exists for their appointment? Who are the foreign judges, where are they from, what are their backgrounds, and what personal characteristics of wisdom and prudence do they possess? By what means are they appointed and paid, and how are their terms in office structured? How do the foreign judges approach their adjudicatory role? When do foreign * Professor of Law, UNSW Sydney. ** Thurgood Marshall Professor of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law School. The authors thank Anna Dziedzic, Mark Graber, Bert Huang, David Feldman, Heinz Klug, Andrew Li, Joseph Marko, Sir Anthony Mason, Will Partlett, Iddo Porat, Theunis Roux, Amelia Simpson, Scott Stephenson, Adrienne Stone, Mark Tushnet, and Simon Young for extremely helpful comments on prior versions of the paper, and Libby Bova, Alisha Jarwala, Amelia Loughland, Brigid McManus, Lachlan Peake, Andrew Roberts, and Melissa Vogt for outstanding research assistance.
    [Show full text]