MINUTES

Meeting: London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Date: Thursday 19 July 2018 Time: 10.00 am Place: Chamber, City Hall, The Queen's Walk, London, SE1 2AA

Copies of the minutes may be found at: http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/whole-assembly

Present:

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman) Florence Eshalomi AM

Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Deputy Chair) Susan Hall AM

Gareth Bacon AM David Kurten AM

Shaun Bailey AM Joanne McCartney AM

Sian Berry AM Steve O'Connell AM

Andrew Boff AM Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM

Leonie Cooper AM Keith Prince AM

Tom Copley AM Caroline Russell AM

Unmesh Desai AM Dr Onkar Sahota AM

Tony Devenish AM Navin Shah AM

Andrew Dismore AM Fiona Twycross AM

Len Duvall AM Peter Whittle AM

City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom: 020 7983 4458 www.london.gov.uk Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 19 July 2018

1 Apologies for Absence and Chairman's Announcements (Item 1)

1.1 An apology for absence was received from Nicky Gavron AM.

1.2 The Chairman welcomed to the public gallery Year 12 students from Higham Lane School in Warwickshire; political journalism students from the University of Oregon; journalism students from South Bank University; young people from Streamz, a charity in Lambeth working with young people aged 16-19 to improve their employment prospects; and Kamahl Sami-Miller, Co-Chair of the Waltham Forest Independent Advisory Group, Stop and Search.

1.3 The Chairman then gave an update on recent Assembly activity. The Assembly had marked the 70th anniversary of the founding of the NHS with a video tribute from all political parties. On behalf of the Assembly, the Chairman thanked Professor Sharma and Dr Malhotra, cardiologists at St George’s Hospital in Tooting, for their contributions.

1.4 The Chairman noted that the Assembly had marked Armed Forces Day with a flag raising ceremony which had been well attended by Assembly Members and the Mayor.

1.5 The Housing Committee had recently heard from tenants on the governance of social housing estates, and the Economy Committee had worked with micro-businesses to collect their views on the challenges they face to survive and prosper.

1.6 The Chairman highlighted the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS), Cressida Dick CBE’s, recent appearance before the Police and Crime Committee to give evidence on the violence blighting London and what the MPS was doing to stem the tide of crime. This would feed into the Committee’s ongoing investigation on tackling the rise of violent crime in London.

1.7 The Chairman noted the recent retirement of Brian Oakaby after sixteen years of dedicated service to the GLA. As Senior Events Officer he had been instrumental in establishing and maintaining the high quality of events across the GLA, and played a significant role in community cultural festivals, the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics, the Holocaust Memorial, and the New Year’s Eve celebrations. The Deputy Chair had made a small presentation to him, on the Assembly’s behalf, at his leaving function. The Chairman wished him all the best in his retirement.

2 Declarations of Interests (Item 2)

2.1 Resolved:

That the list of offices held by Assembly Members, as set out in the table at Agenda Item 2, be noted as disclosable pecuniary interests.

2

Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 19 July 2018

2.2 The Chairman confirmed that the dispensation awarded to all Members by the Monitoring Officer in 2017 meant that, while Members had a disclosable pecuniary interest in the issue at Agenda Item 7, they were properly able to take a decision on matters relating to their remuneration under that item on the agenda.

3 Minutes (Item 3)

3.1 Resolved:

That the minutes from the London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) meeting held on 21 June 2018 be signed by the Chairman as a correct record.

4 Mayor's Report (Item 4)

4.1 The Assembly noted the Mayor’s Report covering the period from 8 June to 5 July 2018.

4.2 In accordance with Standing Order 5.4A, the Mayor gave an oral update on matters occurring since the publication of his report. The record of the oral update is attached at Appendix 1.

5 Questions to the Mayor (Item 5)

5.1 The record of the discussion with the Mayor, including oral answers given by the Mayor to Members’ questions, is attached as Appendix 2.

5.2 The written answers to those questions not asked or unanswered during the meeting is attached as Appendix 3.

5.3 During the course of the question and answer session the Chairman proposed, and it was agreed, that Standing Order 2.9B be suspended to extend the meeting in order to allow the remaining questions on the priority order paper to be put to the Mayor and for the remaining items of business on the agenda to be considered.

5.4 At the conclusion of the question and answer session, the Assembly agreed the motion set out on the agenda in the name of the Chairman, namely:

“That the Assembly notes the answers to the questions asked”.

3

Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 19 July 2018

6 Motions (Item 6)

6.1 Tony Arbour AM moved and Jenette Arnold OBE AM seconded the following motion, which, in accordance with Standing Order 3.5, incorporated a minor alteration moved by Tony Arbour AM, namely to add the Economy Committee to those Assembly committee’s listed in the motion:

“The motion agreed by the Assembly at the London Assembly (Plenary) meeting on 7 June 2018 reiterated the Assembly’s long-standing opposition to a third runway at Heathrow airport and set out a positive resolution to campaign to prevent its implementation. Noting that motion, the Assembly agrees that the Transport, Environment, Housing, Planning, Economy and Health Committees will have a standing item on the agenda for each of its meetings to formally consider how it will contribute to the Assembly’s work in opposing the expansion of Heathrow Airport and a third runway.”

6.2 Upon being put to the vote, the motion in the name of Tony Arbour AM, as alterered, was unanimously agreed.

7 Pay Award 2018-19 for GLA Statutory Officers (Item 7)

7.1 The Assembly received the report of the Interim Head of Paid Service.

7.2 Resolved:

That:

(a) Noting that it is a joint decision with the Mayor, a pay award of 2% be made to the Head of Paid Service and the Executive Director of Resources, as Statutory Officers, be agreed;

(b) The substantive pay of the Monitoring Officer to be settled through the staff pay award be noted; and

(c) In accordance with the Senior Salaries Review Body (SRRB) recommendation made and agreed in 2009, the application of the local government pay settlement of 2% for 2018-19 to the pay of the Mayor and Assembly Members be noted.

[Note: See also Item 2: Declarations of Interest.]

4

Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 19 July 2018

8 Proposed Changes to the Assembly's Decision-Making Framework and Scheme of Delegation (Item 8)

8.1 The Assembly received the report of the Executive Director of Secretariat.

8.2 Resolved:

(a) That the proposed changes to the Decision-Making Framework: The London Assembly & its Committees, as set out at Appendix A to the report, including approval to the following delegations of authority, be agreed:

(i) That the Assembly agrees to delegate authority to the Chair of the GLA Oversight Committee, to approve, following consultation with the Deputy Chair of the GLA Oversight Committee and, where appropriate, the relevant Assembly Committee Chair (and any other Member as deemed necessary), any non-routine expenditure in relation to the Assembly’s scrutiny functions, with the exception of expenditure for consultancy, including research services and polling, which is subject to separate procedures, as outlined in the Assembly’s Decision-Making Framework;

(ii) That the Assembly agrees to delegate authority to the Chair of the GLA Oversight Committee, to approve, following consultation with the Deputy Chair of the GLA Oversight Committee, the relevant Assembly Committee Chair (and any other Member as deemed necessary), any urgent requests for expenditure for consultancy, including research services and polling, noting that, where there is no case for urgency, the usual procedures set out in the Assembly’s Decision-Making Framework will apply; and

(b) That the Scheme of Delegations of Functions of the London Assembly be updated to reflect the additional delegations of authority to the Chair of the GLA Oversight Committee accordingly.

9 Fire, Resilience and Emergency Planning Committee Revised Terms of Reference (Item 9)

9.1 The Assembly received the report of the Executive Director of Secretariat.

9.2 Resolved:

That the revised terms of reference for the Fire, Resilience and Emergency Planning Committee as set out in Appendix 1 to the report, be agreed.

5

Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 19 July 2018

10 Future Meetings (Item 10)

10.1 Resolved:

(a) That it be agreed that the Assembly, under section 61 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999, require the attendance of Sir Peter Hendy CBE (Chair, LLDC) and Lyn Garner (Chief Executive, LLDC) at the 6 September 2018 London Assembly (Plenary) meeting at 10am, for which notice will be given in accordance with section 62 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 in due course, to answer questions in relation to the policies and work of the London Legacy Development Corporation; and

(b) That the Assembly provisionally agree to hold an additional Plenary meeting on Monday 3 September 2018 at 2pm in the Chamber principally to hold a question and answer session with Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London, regarding his draft Health Inequalities Strategy, subject to its finalisation.

11 Proposed Delegation of Authority to the Chairman of the Assembly (Item 11)

11.1 The Assembly received the report of the Executive Director of Secretariat.

11.2 Resolved:

That, in relation to urgent matters only, a general delegation of authority in respect of the Assembly’s powers and functions (apart from those that cannot under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 be delegated) be given to the Chairman of the Assembly, in consultation with the Deputy Chair, party Group Leaders and relevant Committee Chair(s), from the close of this meeting until the next meeting of the Assembly, which will be the Plenary meeting on 3 September 2018.

12 Date of Next Meeting (Item 12)

12.1 The next scheduled meeting of the London Assembly was the Plenary meeting at 2pm on Monday 3 September 2018 in the Chamber, City Hall.

13 Any Other Business the Chairman Considers Urgent (Item 13)

13.1 There was no business the Chairman considered urgent.

6

Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 19 July 2018

14 Close of Meeting

14.1 The meeting ended at 12.52pm

Chairman Date

Contact Officer: Laura Pelling Principal Committee Manager GLA Secretariat, City Hall The Queen’s Walk, London, SE1 2AA Telephone: 020 7983 5526 Email: [email protected]

7

This page is intentionally left blank Appendix 1

London Assembly Mayor’s Question Time – Thursday 19 July 2018 Transcript of Item 3 – Oral Update to the Mayor’s Report

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): The Mayor will now provide an oral update of up to five minutes in length on matters occurring since the publication of his report. Assembly Members have submitted two requests for topics for inclusion within the update.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Good morning. This week the news has been dominated by Brexit yet again, an issue that could have profound consequences for the lives of millions of Londoners. Since the day after the European Union (EU) referendum, I have been working to ensure that London’s voice is heard and to fight for a Brexit deal that is in the best interests of all Londoners, and that is what I will continue to do.

Last week I wrote to the Prime Minister [the Rt. Hon Theresa May MP] to warn her that the Government’s White Paper completely fails to meet the needs of our leading service sectors, which represent 92% of our economy in London, a concern shared by many business leaders in London and across our country. There is no doubt that the kind of hard Brexit the Government is now proposing would throw up new regulatory barriers that will damage the ability of our world-leading creative, tech and financial services to do business across the EU. This would cause huge economic harm, with repercussions felt not just here in London but across the country. Worse still, with the division and disarray within the Government and the Prime Minister capitulating once again to the hard Brexiteers in her party, it is clearer than ever before there is a grave risk that we could crash out of the EU with no deal at all. This is the worst possible scenario, one that independent experts predict could lead to nearly 90,000 fewer jobs in our city. That is why I have instructed officials here at City Hall to step up preparations for such a devastating no-deal situation. I urge the Prime Minister to start putting the national interest ahead of her own interests, and her country ahead of her party. We are now running out of time. The Government needs to change course and quickly, and accept that staying within the single market and the customs union is the best way to protect jobs and growth across the United Kingdom (UK).

Since we last met, I have also been working on a number of strategies and initiatives to improve the lives of Londoners. This includes continuing to do everything possible to tackle violent crime, not only by cracking down on violent crime but the root causes of violent crime, too. I have also continued to lobby Ministers for the extra resources we need to help keep our city safe.

Chairman, I have been asked for two oral updates. The first one is on the Brexit White Paper from Assembly Member [Andrew] Dismore. I wrote to the Prime Minister last week warning that her White Paper completely fails to meet the needs of our leading service sectors, a concern shared by many London and UK business leaders. This kind of hard Brexit will throw up new regulatory barriers which will damage the ability of our world-leading creative, tech, professional and financial services to do business across the EU, putting jobs at risk across the country. 92% of London’s economy is service-based, and the strength of these businesses is seen beyond the capital. The financial and professional services industries alone employ over 2.2 million people across the country, only a third of whom are based in London. Trading services accounts for roughly 40% of UK exports to the EU and includes our world-leading financial services, accountants and lawyers.

It was my intention to respond more fully to the White Paper, taking on board the advice of my Brexit Advisory Panel. However, given the Prime Minister’s capitulation to her hard Brexiteers, it is looking increasingly unclear whether there will be a White Paper to respond to. It is already clear that the kind of Brexit that the

Page 1

Government is currently offering is untested, complex, expensive, and will take years to fully implement. Even if the EU were to agree with the deal being proposed, due to the exclusion of services there is a very real risk that jobs and investment that could have been ours might go elsewhere in Europe. Now, with the Prime Minister having accepted amendments to the Customs Bill proposed by hard-line Brexiteers, it is clearer than ever that we are at grave risk of crashing out of the EU with no deal, a situation that would cost nearly 90,000 jobs in London and nearly 500,000 across the UK according to independent analysis we commissioned from Cambridge Econometrics. This is now a risk. That is why in my letter to the Prime Minister last Friday I urged her, for the good of the economy and thousands of people’s jobs, to change course and seek a deal that keeps us in the Single Market and Customs Union.

The second request, Chairman, for an urgent oral update was from Assembly Member [Caroline] Pidgeon MBE. It is on Oxford Street. I wrote to the Leader of Westminster [Council] on 3 July [2018] and stated my disappointment at Westminster’s unilateral decision to walk away from two years of joint work to transform Oxford Street and the surrounding district. Westminster is the highway and planning authority for Oxford Street, and it is now incumbent on it to prepare an alternative plan that adequately addresses the known challenges to the area, including poor air quality, road safety, pedestrian crowding and a poor public realm. Failure to address these issues comprehensively and holistically will undermine the future economic success of London’s West End offer. The success of Oxford Street is important not only to the economic prosperity of London but also to the UK economy as a whole. The Council has now set out its intention to bring forward some initial pedestrianisation and safety changes to be delivered later this year, followed by a wider piece of work on the Oxford Street district. This timetable indicated Westminster will provide information on the safety scheme next month. I expect it to stick to this timeline, and I have also requested an update on the district-wide scheme by September [2018].

When I have seen these proposals and assessed how they address the challenges in the area, I will make a decision on Transport for London’s (TfL) and the GLA’s next steps for this project. We are doing our part and have already reduced the number of buses that use Oxford Street by 40%, and we continue to do what we can to reduce this further. Now it is up to the Council to step up and tell us how it proposes to make Oxford Street fit for a world-leading 21st-century city. It is worth reminding Assembly Members that pedestrianised Oxford Street was a manifesto commitment also made by the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives.

Thank you. I look forward to answering questions during the course of this morning.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much.

Tony Devenish AM: Mr Mayor, good morning. I know we have had some ill-tempered discussions recently on Oxford Street on other issues, but are you aware that your officers have agreed funding that has been pulled of £23.5 million for one of the most deprived wards in London, namely Church Street, for a redevelopment project? The reason given, Mr Mayor, is we have not held a ballot. We have held a ballot for that scheme. Would you please re-look at this? This is hitting the most vulnerable people. We may disagree on Oxford Street, we may disagree on closed-circuit television (CCTV), but this is about the most vulnerable people on a housing scheme that will actually increase by 406 homes net affordable housing in the City of Westminster.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, the question must be in order because you have allowed it. I am not sure what it has to do with Oxford Street or Brexit.

Page 2

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Yes, indeed. I understood this was going to be related to a suggestion that this was in retaliation for Westminster City Council’s policy on Oxford Street.

Tony Devenish AM: I am trying to be more diplomatic than that, Chairman.

Joanne McCartney AM: That is not what was said.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): I am not very good at being diplomatic.

Tony Devenish AM: What we are looking for is the money that was agreed.

Len Duvall AM: Chairman, I am asking for a ruling. Is there a new way that we are doing these updates and anyone can chip in with any extra questions that they like? If that is what the policy is going to be, that is fine; I agree with the Assembly Member asking his question; but we will be ready and waiting for that, to introduce that.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): No. That is not the policy. Assembly Member Devenish did tell me beforehand that he was going to link this, as I already mentioned to the Mayor, with his policy on Oxford Street, but he did not do that in his question.

Tony Devenish AM: I thought I had tried to, but if I did not do that, I apologise.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Anyway, that is why it is in order. You could simply say it is not and that is the end of it.

Len Duvall AM: Point of order, Chairman. I do not wish to challenge the Chairman, but I am not sure that the way you have worked this out between you beforehand, or not, is the right way on the mayoral update. I think the Mayor can handle himself and I hope he answers it quickly, but it is just not the way that the updates are meant to be done. If we are going to have a new way of these updates, I do not mind, Chairman, but let us have a discussion around that, that we all are treated equally about this. I do not think this question or the way that it is being phrased is correct, to be honest, and I think it goes against our procedures.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Indeed, but of course any Member can speak to me beforehand as to how it is discussed. I am completely even-handed as far as that is concerned.

Len Duvall AM: It is about our procedures and rules, and you are the guardian of those procedures and rules. In this case, I think your ruling is wrong. I would beg you to take advice from officers. I stand to be corrected, but I do not think this is the right way to raise that question under the current rules unless you change them. Sorry.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Yes. In this particular case, given the way that the question was phrased, there is no appropriate linkage. Therefore, the question falls, but I have no doubt that Assembly Member Devenish will think of some subtle way of raising the matter later.

Andrew Dismore AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor, for your statement on the White Paper. Coincidentally, just a few days after the Chequers so-called agreement, the Economy Committee at City Hall held an evidence hearing on Brexit and its impact on London. All the experts, from whichever side of the debate they came, agreed that this was not the comprehensive plan we need to protect the capital’s economy and Londoners’

Page 3 jobs, and there was not a hope that Brussels would accept it anyway. I think you do agree that after the White Paper wrangling this week and the deadlock in Parliament, with the Prime Minister in thrall to the Conservative Party’s Brexiteer extremists, the economic health of London is very much at risk. Is the time not coming for the People’s Vote, a second referendum on the final deal, if there is one, and with an option to remain? Then we can all make a properly informed choice, hopefully without fake news, without broken campaign spending limits and without Russian or President [Donald] Trump’s involvement.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The new Secretary of State is going to Brussels today, and we wish [The Rt. Hon] Dominic Raab [MP, Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union] well in his meeting with Michel Barnier [European Chief Negotiator for the UK Exiting the EU] and his team. I think you are right to remind us that a negotiation involves two sides. Even assuming that the Government were able to achieve all her objectives with the White Paper, it would still be catastrophic for London’s economy. As I said in my answer, 92% of our economy is the service sector. I think of finance, think of insurance, think of legal and think of accountancy. I can understand the concern about consequences for our city.

In relation to the people’s referendum point you raised in part of your question, I have been quite clear since the day after the referendum results that I am devastated that our country has voted to leave the EU, and I am incredibly proud that London voted to remain, the one region in England that voted to remain. I have also said, if it is the case that the UK Parliament, which is sovereign, rejects the deal the Government secures with the EU in October, then everything is back on the table. That includes the possibility of a referendum, but it also includes the possibility of a general election. The reality is that Brexiteers cannot have it both ways. On the one hand they claim Parliament is sovereign. On the other hand, if Parliament rejects the EU deal made by the Government, they are scared about a referendum or a general election. They are also scared, by the way, of Parliament’s vote, and so it is for them to answer what happens if Parliament rejects the EU deal.

Andrew Dismore AM: Thank you.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you very much for your answer. I share your frustration with Westminster City Council. Obviously, it had a Cabinet meeting on Monday evening. I am wondering, have you spoken to Councillor Nickie Aiken, the Leader of Westminster Council, since they rejected these joint proposals since this Cabinet meeting?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I have written to the Leader and she has responded to me. You will appreciate, Assembly Member, that in light of the hard work and conversations we have been having over two years, there is a certain feeling among TfL, City Hall and myself about the lack of goodwill on their part, hence you will appreciate my reluctance to meet. Frankly speaking, it is clear from the evidence we have had over two years that you cannot put much weight on what politicians or officers say to us from that Council. That is why we are very angry and frustrated.

Just to give you an idea, it looks like we have wasted £8 million of taxpayers’ money. There have been dozens and dozens and dozens of meetings with the Council and with officers, including with stakeholders, and so you will appreciate we are now doing things through correspondence. I have written to the Leader, I think she has responded to me, and I will be dealing with her letter soon. The ball is in their court now. They have said they are going to come up with plans that are better than the plans we spent two years working together on, that had the support of the vast majority of Londoners, and let us wait and see what they do.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Have you seen or discussed at all their new limited plans for changing Oxford Street which were outlined in this Cabinet report? Have you looked at any of that yet?

Page 4

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): TfL officials are going through them now. You will appreciate the objectives that we had, and we spent many hustings talking about this. You will appreciate that their concerns are not in relation to crowding, not in relation to public realm, not in relation to air quality. The additional concern we now know about - vehicle mitigation duties there are - but also we all know that once the Elizabeth line opens there will be additional people coming into that part of London. The question that the Council has to answer is not just in relation to those concerns, but what is the future of retail in the 21st century for Oxford Street when you have internet shopping but also shopping malls that are attractive for customers? That is why it is frustrating that the Council does not appreciate that this is important not just for London but the entire UK economy.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: You said you are expecting a full update by September [2018] and you are then going to look at that and make a decision. Have you looked at your powers under the GLA Act to either take over Oxford Street as a strategic road or to actually direct the borough in order for Westminster to meet the requirements of your Transport Strategy? It is very clear in your Strategy. You specifically state that you will transform the experience of walking and cycling in central London by transforming Oxford Street. If Westminster’s new plans do not transform Oxford Street, could you use your powers on this strategically important road?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Could I thank you for the motion that you moved and was passed by the Assembly -- I beg your pardon.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: It is the other Caroline.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The other Caroline, Assembly Member Russell, moved it and it was passed by the Assembly. Apologies, Caroline. The best way to answer that, bearing in mind it is only fair to wait for the Council’s response, is that we will consider all options.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: OK. Thank you for that. Regent Street is currently having its annual traffic-free Summer Streets for the sixth consecutive year. What are your plans for Oxford Street to have similar events?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You mean car-free streets. The problem is it needs the partnership and co-operation of the Council to do these things. The retailers on Regent Street plus the Crown Estate have worked collegiately with the Council, and the Council deserves credit for the four days during July where they closed the street off. It is fantastic. You have been there. You have seen how great it is: the ambience, the atmosphere it creates and stuff. That is why this U-turn from the Council is surprising, but let us wait and see what the Council does.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: In your manifesto, though, you specifically said you were going to bring back car-free days, possibly weekends, before moving towards full pedestrianisation. For many years Oxford Street was pedestrianised in the run up to Christmas for at least one day. They had these Very Important Pedestrian Days. They were really successful and brought tens of thousands more people into Oxford Street. Will you do everything you can to see if you could get a traffic-free day on Oxford Street before Christmas?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You will know we have managed to achieve some traffic-free areas in that part of London during Lumiere, so it can be done where there is a willingness on all sides to make it work. We

Page 5 are keen to do so. The good news is actually it is easier now because there are fewer buses, so the diversions are fewer. We would like to do so.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Will you try to get one before Christmas?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): To be fair, let us wait and see the Council’s response to pedestrianisation. Then, hopefully, when the feelings we have thaw, we can maybe talk about that stuff. We are happy to support this. You will hear in answer to a question later on the support we are giving financially, plus officer time, to car-free days and car-free events. It is really important we do so because it gives people the experience that there is a life outside of cars, using the busy roads, that sometimes they are able to be pedestrians.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you very much. I welcome your answers.

Page 6 Appendix 2

London Assembly Mayor’s Question Time – Thursday 19 July 2018 Transcript of Item 4 – Questions to the Mayor

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you. Now we go to the questions which have been formally tabled, and the first question is from Assembly Member McCartney and it relates to serious youth violence.

2018/1820 - Serious Youth Violence - Parents’/Carers’ Advice Joanne McCartney AM

Parents/Carers often don’t know where to go for advice when their child is at risk or involved in criminal activity. How are you ensuring that they have easy access to advice and guidance, and how are you ensuring that their experiences are taken into account in your youth violence prevention work?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. We are doing everything we can from City Hall to tackle youth violence, but we cannot do this alone. We need more help from Government. We also need the whole community, including parents and carers, to play their vital part in tackling violent crime. Parents and carers play a crucial role in our response to tackling youth violence, and we must support them in doing this.

Throughout the development and now delivery of this [London Knife Crime] Strategy, my officials have continued to work with and consult parents, including bereaved parents, to inform our responses to knife crime. This includes hearing from bereaved parents at my Knife Crime Summits and at partnership roundtable discussions. Most recently, parents and carers were actively involved and consulted within the development of my London Needs You Alive toolkit which I launched last month. The toolkit will be disseminated to community groups, faith groups and to schools and colleges across London, and provides targeted advice that will support parents and carers in talking to their children about knife crime. It includes a parent’s guide to knife crime and a range of resources which have been developed to support parents to work with their children. The toolkit also signposts parents to a number of helplines, including the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) helpline, which provides 24-hour help and support to thousands of parents and families. This information will also be accessible via our London Needs You Alive online hub.

I have also recently funded six projects via my Knife Crime Community Seed Fund to the value of £158,000, which is aimed at supporting community groups to work with parents and families. Further opportunities for additional support are available via my £45 million Youth Fund, which I set up to support communities to work with young people at risk of getting caught up in crime.

Joanne McCartney AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. The reason I ask this is because I have attended a number of local meetings now where people, and parents in particular, have said they do not know where to go and get help. These resources are really welcome. How are you going to make sure that they are consistently applied across London? One parent told me she had looked on her council website and could not find any information there and did not know where to go. Is there a role for councils as well to be highlighting and promoting these materials?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think so. I think all councils deserve huge credit. We recently had a meeting and invited the council leaders, chief executives, directors of social services, the community safety partnerships from each council, along with senior police, Sophie Linden, the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, and myself. Every council was represented, which is unprecedented. I think councils realise no one is immune from this.

Page 7

We are working on having a digital facility available to parents and carers so they can find the nearest community centre or youth club available to them, but also you are right. There are online facilities we can make available. The toolkit will help, and councils have a role to play. Often a parent or carer will go to their local council rather than going to another website and stuff, and we have to make sure councils understand the importance of promoting the toolkit, promoting the helpline, but also providing parents with the help they need. You know, as indeed I do, how difficult and challenging it is to raise children in the 21st century with the other distractions there are. That is why parents need the assistance they can get from people like us in positions of power and influence, including councils.

Joanne McCartney AM: Thank you.

Florence Eshalomi AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. On this subject, the Commissioner has mentioned that sometimes the police are met with a wall of silence, and that they are looking at ways of encouraging people to come forward, but the reality is that it is a two-way street. When people do come forward sometimes, they feel that they are not getting the help and the assistance. I cite an example of a young boy who was stabbed in Tulse Hill in 2016. His mum sought help from the local Member of Parliament (MP), the police and the Council and a range of different partners in terms of them moving. That boy was stabbed again three weeks ago, 97 times. Thankfully, he still survived. Is there anything more that the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) can do in terms of making sure all the agencies are actually connecting and, more importantly, talking to each other in terms of how to help people?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There is a convening role that we have and we are playing in trying to bring people together. One of my frustrations is the lack of powers we have. If there was a duty placed on every public authority in relation to this area, you would have some real change. We had a presentation from Wales recently. We have talked about Scotland, but in Wales there is this duty which helps them convene and bring people together. Let me give you an example. We will not use that particular case. The local authority has finite housing. We know that there is a housing crisis. Often it is very difficult for them to find an alternative place for somebody to be rehoused if they are in danger.

We know the police can protect witnesses who are vulnerable, and there are witness protection schemes, but even if you are able to find a property outside of the area to keep that child safe, all the support system that is needed - social services, Youth Offending Teams (YOTs), other support that an individual may need - will not be there unless there is proper joined-up thinking. It is difficult. One of the things we have to do is make it easier for people to come forward. I know, for example, from speaking to officers many, many times, people will not come forward to assist the police because they are worried about reprisals, but also they feel, wrongly, they can keep themselves safer than the police can. That is why I would encourage anybody with any information about a criminal offence, whether you are the victim or a witness, to please report it to the police, and they will do their best to keep you safe in the context of other public authorities - the police, youth services, it could be the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), it could be social services, it could be the NHS - working together.

Florence Eshalomi AM: Thank you.

Unmesh Desai AM: Mr Mayor, we do know that there are common factors which are present in the lives of young people committing serious violence. School exclusions, for instance. Is MOPAC doing anything specifically to develop an understanding of these common factors?

Page 8 Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): On exclusions in particular, Sophie Linden, the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, met with the head of the academies this week to discuss this issue. You will be aware, Unmesh, that actually one of the concerns that boroughs have is the lack of accountability with schools in their borough. Previously, with local management of schools, a borough would know what is happening in different schools and could make sure exclusions were consistent. There is a real concern now in some schools excluding children because it affects exam tables and because it affects other factors, and then they go to Pupil Referral Units (PRUs), but they are not really going to the PRUs, and it can lead to all sorts of other issues. You and I have both met too many people involved in criminality who at some stage were excluded. At this week’s Serious Violent Crime Taskforce meeting chaired by the Home Secretary, I made the point that there needs to be a policy around exclusions. Edward Timpson [CBE, former Minister of State for Children and Families], the former MP, is doing a review in relation to exclusions. I have written to him and I am due to meet with him to express my concern about exclusions leading to young people not having constructive things to do, which can lead to them getting involved in crime. That is just one factor. There are other factors as well, as you know.

Unmesh Desai AM: Indeed. Just to carry on, Mr Mayor, at the Knife Crime Summit on 27 June [2018] MOPAC’s Head of Insight told us that victims and offenders of violent crime overlap and that these people usually come into contact with a range of services before they commit a serious offence. This obviously gives the public sector a number of opportunities to intervene and make a positive difference to that young person’s life. How can we make the most of these interactions? What more can be done to turn around the lives of young people who are at risk of committing violent crime?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There is this statistical evidence that shows that a large number of those who are victims of crime sometimes later on get involved in being arrested for criminality, so you are right. If we can at an early stage work with people to turn them around, it makes a big difference. That is one of the reasons why we have invested this year more money in youth workers in trauma centres, in accident and emergencies (A&Es). It is that teachable moment. We are doing work with St Giles Trust, Redthread and many others to make sure we help victims, to provide them with the support and the assistance they need, so later on, God forbid, there is no reprisal or them getting involved in criminality.

The context, though, is that over the last few years we have seen a huge cut in preventative services, a huge cut in diversionary services, from youth work, mental health services, wraparound care, and other services that we know local authorities provided and the third sector provided as well. One of the reasons that I have diverted money from business rates to a new Young Londoners Fund is to invest in prevention and diversion, and at the same time investing £140 million in enforcement as well. It focuses on all three: enforcement, prevention and diversion as well.

Unmesh Desai AM: Thank you.

Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you. The school holidays should be a time for enjoyment, a pleasant time for young people, and that is what most of us will remember them being, but they clearly present potential risks. Now that we are around the time of school summer holidays in London, what support will be available for children and young people throughout London during this time, and what work is MOPAC and the wider GLA doing to link communities and young people with these services?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are right. Actually, past evidence tells us that in July and August crime is known to increase, and it does not take an expert to work out why that is when you bear in mind that in the recent years in July and August the number of activities young people can do has gone down. What I have done this year is to make sure we accelerate the new money that I have announced, but also make sure

Page 9 the money is being used in those areas where the young people do not have constructive things to do. I cannot go into every single example of the facilities we are funding, but 1,700 more young people will be involved in sport and activities because of the funding we have announced recently. 950 vulnerable young Londoners will be participating in summer schools this summer, which they were not before. 800 young people will be getting assistance from grassroots community projects to tackle violent crime. That is just to give you a vignette of some of the things we are doing. It is not enough by itself. Local authorities are frustrated because of the cuts they have had from central Government, but they are trying, to give them credit, to do what they can within limited resources. We have to make sure we give young people constructive things to do this summer. It is going to be a hot summer. Long days. What we do not want is because young people do not have constructive things to do, they get involved in antisocial behaviour or criminality.

I will make this one final point, Fiona, which you know, but the vast, vast, vast majority of young people are law-abiding, peaceful, a credit to themselves, their families and their communities. We are talking about a small number who may get attracted to criminality or antisocial behaviour because they do not have constructive things to do. I am not excusing criminality. I am just explaining some of the factors that experts say we need to address, and we are trying to address them this year. The good news is that we think we can build on this year, so next year will be an even better offer because councils will ramp up and help us and we will have more money going out the door, the £45 million.

Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. The next question on the order paper is from Assembly Member Russell and relates to the Heathrow third runway.

2018/1746 - Commons vote on Heathrow third runway Caroline Russell AM

What actions will you take to stop the third runway at Heathrow?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman, and thank you for your question. It is disappointing that despite our best efforts, the National Policy Statement (NPS) on Heathrow Expansion was approved by the House of Commons. I firmly believe it is the wrong approach. As you will recall, when I appeared before the Assembly last month, I announced that I intended to play a part in the legal challenge to the NPS. I can tell the Assembly this morning that this process is now under way and that a formal pre-application protocol letter has now been submitted to the Government. This sets out the overarching legal grounds of the case and requests key documents. Officers are working closely with their counterparts at the five boroughs with whom we are joint claimants, namely Hammersmith & Fulham, Hillingdon, Richmond, Wandsworth, and Windsor & Maidenhead. Air quality will be central to the case, noting the dire impact of Heathrow on our legal obligations to address this public health crisis of toxic air. Noise, surface access and climate change will also likely feature.

Given the dire noise, air quality and surface access impacts of Heathrow expansion and the failure of the NPS to adequately address these concerns, we believe there is merit in the legal case. I remain committed to opposing such a short-sighted decision which would have dire consequences for the health and quality of life of Londoners.

Page 10 Caroline Russell AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor, and I am really proud that we as an Assembly and you, our Mayor, are united in our position against a third runway at Heathrow. It would be desperately damaging to the lives of hundreds of thousands of Londoners.

After the Commons vote on the third runway on 25 June [2018], you tweeted that it was “the wrong decision”. Do you have a message for the ten Conservative and 17 Labour London MPs that voted in support of the third runway?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think they are wrong, and this is not party-political, by the way. It is worth noting, Chairman, through you, that the five boroughs involved are of different sizes, different political persuasions, and are united in relation to our concerns, but also there is one borough outside of London as well that understands these concerns. I think they have got it wrong.

We all understand the importance of jobs, growth and prosperity. We all understand the importance of London being open to business. Heathrow is not the answer. No one is anti-Heathrow. I suspect those of us who are against the expansion are anti-expansion. That is why it is important for those MPs who, in my view, wrongly believe Heathrow is the answer to reflect upon actually the consequences of runway 3 at Heathrow.

Caroline Russell AM: Thank you. I am really glad in your initial answer that you mentioned that the grounds for the legal case include noise and pollution, but also that you include climate change as one of the grounds of your legal challenge. Will you give climate change as much weight as pollution and noise in the joint legal action? It is one of the strongest arguments.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I just say this. As somebody who used to be a lawyer, doing what your client tells you is not always the best answer in relation to winning a case. We will be guided by the legal advice. What I suspect we will do, Caroline, is pursue those lines of argument which we have the best chance of winning the case on.

Caroline Russell AM: OK. You must be aware that for any airport expansion in the UK to be consistent with our climate change targets, sectors such as transport, building and agriculture need to cut their carbon emissions by at least 80%, but according to the Committee on Climate Change, that is just not happening.

I do not know if you are aware of the work of Plan B, who are an environmental charity, who are currently taking the Government to court because the UK’s carbon targets are based on 2ºC warming and not the 1.5ºC which is based on the Paris Climate Agreement. Would you meet with Plan B so they can tell you about the significance of climate change in their legal case and the relevance that it may have for your joint legal action with the boroughs?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, I would be keen for either Shirley [Rodrigues, Deputy Mayor for Environment and Energy] or myself to meet with them, yes, sooner rather than later.

Caroline Russell AM: Yes, sooner rather than later. Yes. That is absolutely fantastic.

The other question is about Gatwick expansion because if Heathrow is not happening, if we say Heathrow should not happen, is it really OK to be dumping the noise and pollution on the people living around Gatwick because they are outside of London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Unfortunately, Gatwick is off the table. My point in relation to Gatwick is actually, if the argument is - and I think the argument is a good one - that there is a need for increased

Page 11 aviation capacity in this part of the country, in the south east of England, there is an alternative. It is cheaper. It would happen far quicker. There are nowhere near the air quality and noise pollution concerns there are with Heathrow. Heathrow has two million people affected by noise pollution. There is an alternative there which the Government could pursue. It has chosen not to pursue Gatwick and is going for Heathrow, so let us wait and see what happens with that.

Caroline Russell AM: Mr Mayor, if we are talking about the climate change argument against Heathrow, it also applies against Gatwick. Your Environment Strategy says that you will work with other global city leaders through the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40) to support the implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement. People are looking for climate leadership. We have seen record-breaking temperatures in London. We are seeing climate breakdown. We have seen the Wanstead flats grass fire. Really frightening changes. Will you consider inviting your C40 counterparts to join you in a joint pledge for no more airport expansion and actually using existing airport capacity better?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I spend a lot of time talking to colleagues in C40. As you know, I am the Vice-Chair of C40. We must not mistake that Heathrow concerns are not just climate change. It is one of a number of factors: air quality, noise, the surface transport links, the public transport links, and climate change. There are a number of different reasons why there are concerns with Heathrow. I accept the case that the argument has been made for increasing aviation capacity in the south east of England. I am not somebody who says, “No more increase in relation to aviation capacity anywhere in the world”.

Caroline Russell AM: OK. I suspect that is incompatible with the climate change argument, but I am out of time now so I am going to have to leave it there.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. The next question if from Assembly Member Whittle and relates to police clear-up rates.

2018/2037 - Police Clear Up Rates Peter Whittle AM

I am sure the Mayor will join me in congratulating the Durham Police Force on becoming the best police force in the country, when it comes to solving crime. They solve 18% of all crimes in the university city, while similar-sized police forces manage a score of just 5%. Mike Barton, Durham's chief constable attributed the force's success to good old-fashioned policing.1 What lessons do you think might the Metropolitan Police learn from the policing model operated by the Durham Force?

1 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sunday-times-crime-map-beat-bobbies-dazzle-indurham-7jtx2dr8k

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Thank you for the question. Durham has achieved excellent results given the national reduction in funding and officer numbers, and it should be congratulated.

As far as comparisons with London are concerned, I think this should be put into context. London has a population of close to nine million, while Durham constabulary serves a population of approximately 620,000, the population of two London boroughs. In terms of resources, at the same time the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has lost 19% of its budget, Durham has lost 9%. The MPS, unlike other forces, also has a remit for national functions and responsibilities, for which we are underfunded. London has some of the most complex crimes and the largest number of gangs and organised crime networks. London also faces London

Page 12 crime demand which falls to the police, including mental health and missing persons, where sanction detection is simply not a measure.

I do agree with Chief Constable Mike Barton about good old-fashioned policing. Real neighbourhood policing with officers who know and are known to the community they serve is at the heart of my agenda for safety in London. I have doubled the number of Dedicated Ward Officers (DWO) working in all of London’s 629 wards. There are now at least two dedicated Police Constables (PC) and a dedicated Police Community Support Officer (PCSO) to help gather intelligence on local issues, detect crime and solve problems: good old-fashioned policing. Police forces across the country work closely with each other, and the MPS Commissioner [Cressida Dick CBE QPM] has been to see the work in Durham, and there are lessons to be learned about how they have invested in technology, for example, where my predecessor failed to make progress.

I would just add that crime is rising across the country, and between April 2017 and March 2018 it rose by 32% in Durham. In the same period, the MPS saw an increase of only 6.4%.

Peter Whittle AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. Did you say there that the Police Commissioner had been up to see Mike Barton? I am very heartened by that. The point, though - I would like to know your view on this - is that although undoubtedly cuts do play a huge part, it is not just about that. What seems to have happened in Durham, as you say, is this combination of bobbies on the beat, which everyone always talks about, and really quite extraordinary technological innovation. I wonder, are there any other lessons you think that the MPS could draw from that to use, basically ways in which maybe Durham is, if you like, heading the field and which we can follow?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Context is important. Durham is the size of one of our Basic Command Units. That is what we are talking about. You are right; it has had to face cuts, not as big as London has. Where it has been very, very impressive is the use of technology. By investing in technology, it has made it easier for police officers to spend more time on the front line. We are now investing in technologies in London. It is really important. Officers are not going back to the police stations, writing up their notes. Tablets will make a big difference, as indeed will the body-worn cameras. It is really important.

It has also not had to cut the PCSOs to the numbers we have. We have lost a huge amount, 65% to 70%. They have not had to do that. PCSOs are really important as the eyes and ears of the PCs. There are lessons that can be looked at from Durham, how it has made it work, but we have to be realistic about scaling up what has happened in Durham to London. That being said, it deserves huge congratulations for detection rates.

Peter Whittle AM: Yes, of course we have to be realistic about it, but it is a massive gap between 5% and 18% really in terms of clear-up. It is something definitely to take on board.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is also a big gap between 6.4% crime going up and 32% crime going up, which is the difference between London and Durham. We can throw figures around.

Peter Whittle AM: I think the point is that people of Durham, therefore, have confidence in their police force. I feel that in London in fact this is actually decreasing. In this context, Mr Mayor, I would like your comment on this. It is something I have brought up at the Police and Crime Committee a number of times relating to the MPS. As of up to January this year, rape in London had gone up by something like 20%. I am sure you would agree with me that is quite a horrifying statistic. When I did ask the Deputy Commissioner and indeed the Commissioner about this, there was a sense in which they did not quite have a grip on the situation. Conviction rates for rape have gone down in the past two years from something like 13% to 7% in the same time. I am very worried that when it comes to the population of London having confidence in their own police

Page 13 force, that when we ask about the reasons why rape has gone up, they draw a blank and they say, “We really don’t know. There is something going on with sexual offending in London but we don’t really know what”. What is your comment on that, Mr Mayor, as Chief Policeman, really?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You have raised a number of points which I will try to deal with one at a time. Firstly, there are a number of explanations for rape reports going up.

Peter Whittle AM: No, this is not just about reporting, Mr Mayor. That was made quite clear. They do not know this. It is not just about reporting.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): One could be because victims have more confidence in reporting crimes to the police because of the heightened awareness because of historic incidents. Secondly is that historic incidents have led to many more complaints being made, which is a good thing. You will have seen the publicity around disclosure in relation to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), which has led to a number of cases - in inverted commas - ‘collapsing’. It is not good enough in relation to the rules of disclosure not being followed, and you will be aware of the review taking place in relation to that.

As far as confidence in policing is concerned, it has not gone down as you suggest. The level of confidence Londoners have in the police has remained consistent. You are right, though, we need to do a better job in relation to there being fewer crimes. We need to do a better job, when there are crimes, of those being detected and the people who are responsible charged, prosecuted and convicted as well.

Peter Whittle AM: OK, Mr Mayor. I think my time is more or less nearly up, but I would just say that we have a huge epidemic of knife crime, we have violent crime, all of these things. I think that this statistic about rape, for whatever reason, has been slightly overshadowed by that. In any other circumstances, in fact, we would really be discussing this every day. Thank you.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. The next question is from Assembly Member Bacon and relates to the Congestion Charge (C-Charge) for private hire vehicles (PHVs).

2018/1990 - Congestion Charge for PHVs Gareth Bacon AM

Is charging private hire vehicles to drive into the Congestion Charge Zone a fair and proportionate measure?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. There is an urgent need to tackle increasing congestion and toxic air in London. These streets are some of the most congested in the capital. This causes delays to bus services, pushes air pollution to critical levels and makes too many places unpleasant for walking and cycling. To tackle congestion and clean up the capital’s toxic air, we need appropriate interventions.

On 6 July [2018] Transport for London (TfL) launched a consultation on a number of proposed changes to C-Charge exemptions and discounts. These include removing the exemption from the C-Charge for all private hire vehicles (PHVs) except those designated as wheelchair-accessible, and introducing a new cleaner vehicle discount to replace the current ultra-low emission discount.

The purpose of these changes is to reduce traffic and congestion in central London, as well as improve air quality. If we do not take further action by 2041, forecasts show that it will take more than an hour to travel 10kms by road in central London. That is 15 minutes longer than it does today. In recent years, the impact of

Page 14 the C-Charge on congestion has lessened due to the increasing number of vehicles who are exempt from paying. Only half of the vehicles in the Congestion Charging Zone in charging hours now pay the full charge.

When the C-Charge was introduced over 15 years ago, it was expected that 4,000 different PHVs would enter the zone daily. The figure is now over 18,000 PHVs in the zone a day in charging hours. If the proposed changes are made, designated wheelchair-accessible PHVs will not be required to pay the charge, along with those that meet the requirements of the cleaner vehicle discount. PHVs that drive outside of the zone and also outside of the hours of operation will not be required to pay the charge. Although there would be a financial impact on private hire drivers and/or operators, there would be a positive impact on the wider population from reduced traffic and better air quality. The proposals remain subject to consultation, and I would encourage everyone to respond so we can consider all the views. No decision has been made yet, and I will decide whether to take the proposals forward following the outcome of consultation.

Gareth Bacon AM: Thank you for the answer, Mr Mayor. What impact will this policy have on traffic levels in the Congestion Charging Zone?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The three different things looked at are the traffic impact on PHVs, traffic and the impact of overall traffic. For PHV traffic, the assessment says a 6% reduction. For overall traffic, a 1% reduction.

Gareth Bacon AM: A 1% reduction. The PHV traffic reduction is how many unique entries per day?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It goes from 18,000 unique entries a day to 10,000 unique entries a day.

Gareth Bacon AM: Where did that figure come from, Mr Mayor?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is the analysis undertaken.

Gareth Bacon AM: The analysis undertaken that I am looking at, which is from the Cambridge Economic Policy Associates, which is what TfL has depended on, suggests that it will be 600 unique entries per day. I think you just said 6,000. In fact, you said 8,000.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The research shows the absolute numbers of PHVs in the zone could fall from over 18,000 vehicles a day to 10,000. The vehicles that remain in the zone will make more journeys, so the traffic impact will be less and will reduce by the equivalent of 600 vehicles a day. What some operators may do is: those drivers already inside the zone do more work, and those outside do not go in.

Gareth Bacon AM: OK. The net impact is a reduction of 600 unique entries per day, notwithstanding what you have said, because I accept what you say that people will stay in the zone and operate around it, so actually we are talking about 600 units per day or 600 unique entries per day.

How much does TfL expect to raise if this proposal goes ahead?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The analysis indicates the removal of the exemption could raise up to £30 million per year. However, this assumes no PHVs would qualify for other discounts or exemptions, eg the cleaner vehicle discount. If PHVs are eligible for other discounts or exemptions, this figure would be expected to go down. We hope the driver will consider whether they need to enter the zone in charging hours and those that do will switch to the cleanest possible vehicles. It is not about raising revenues. It is about dealing with congestion.

Page 15

Gareth Bacon AM: If they change to cleaner vehicles, they will not have to pay the C-Charge, so it will not make any difference on congestion, will it?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, but the idea is to do two things. One is the congestion. Two is the air quality. You will appreciate the discount for cleaner vehicles stops in 2025, and the idea is we have zero-emission vehicles.

Gareth Bacon AM: Yes. I am focusing on congestion for the purposes of this question, though. In percentage terms, how much more would a small operator have to charge in order to cover the costs of paying the C-Charge?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There are three options open to an operator. One is for the operator to pay the charge. Two is for that charge to be paid for by the driver, and/or by the passenger. Those are decisions for the operator to take.

Gareth Bacon AM: Again, Mr Mayor, the report that TfL is relying on estimates that a small operator would have to raise their charges by 16%. Off the back of that, the same report states, and I will quote it to you,

“It is likely to have a disproportionately large impact on trips provided by small operators, as they would be less able to accommodate the increased charge, and some small operators could subsequently be forced out of business. Drivers are also likely to bear at least some of the charge, particularly for the largest operators, and this could adversely impact on already-low earnings.”

Are you content with that?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is why I asked for an impact assessment to be done, so we can see the impact of these plans. It is for operators to decide how they spread out the charge. If the charge is £10.50, if it is automated, it could be paid by the operator, and the operator could decide to specialise and have a finite number of vehicles going into the C-Charge area. The operator could decide to share it with the driver, if the driver wants to go into the C-Charge area, or the operator could decide for the passenger to pay the charge or a percentage of the charge. For example, if a driver made ten journeys in the C-Charge area in a day, you would expect a passenger to pay £1 extra according to the trip he or she makes. That is the decision for the operators to take, not for us to dictate to the operator how they spread the charge.

Gareth Bacon AM: As the report has made very clear, the smaller operators who are earning the least money are likely to be hit disproportionately hard because they will not be able to absorb it. They will have to either pass it on or they will not afford to operate anymore. Does that not cause you some concern?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The smaller operators have already decided not to work in central London because of the challenges made by other big companies that we know about, which we have talked about in the past. What we do need to realise is that actually when the C-Charge was first brought in, the exemption was brought in ostensibly to encourage those minicab operators who were not licensed to become licensed: a carrot, if you like. Also, at that stage, the expectation was 4,000 vehicles coming into the C-Charge area a day. It is now 18,000 vehicles coming into the C-Charge area a day. All this is subject to consultation, by the way. One of the things that the plans are seeking to do is to reduce the numbers of vehicles coming into the C-Charge area.

Page 16 According to the research you are reading, from 18,000, the number of vehicles coming in could be as low as 10,000, which is 8,000 fewer vehicles coming into the C-Charge area.

Gareth Bacon AM: Actually, no, as we have already discussed, Mr Mayor, the conclusion of the report is that the net reduction would be 600 vehicles because a number of the vehicles would come in and stay.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Think about road space. If you think of road space, for example, 10,000 not coming into the C-Charge area is, in road space terms, a big, big amount of road space. It is not simply a question of vehicles. It is a question of road space, congestion and air quality, but congestion is the main issue.

Gareth Bacon AM: Your answer there defeats your own argument because, as you have said yourself, the vehicles will come into the Congestion Charging Zone and stay there. That does not equate to an increase in road space. It equates to it being exactly the same, or at least a marginal difference. That is why the net figure of 600 is significant.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, there is a reduction in road space. Just logically, if you think about it, there are fewer vehicles coming in.

Gareth Bacon AM: They are staying longer. They are not leaving. They are coming in and staying, and that is the point, Mr Mayor. That is why the net decrease of 600 is so significant in the context of this. It will not free up road space.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The number of unique vehicles coming in is 45% less. The impact on PHV traffic is 6% less. The impact on overall traffic is 1% less. Whichever way you slice it and dice it, there are still fewer vehicles, less overall traffic and less PHV traffic.

Gareth Bacon AM: There are going to be 600 fewer units net. There is going to be a decrease of 1% in the Congestion Charging Zone. At the same time, there is going to be a massively disproportionate cost passed on to those cab firms that are least able to pay them. Does that not cause you any concern?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): One of the things that we need to do is look at the consultation responses. I am sure those smaller firms will be responding, not just the big companies that we have seen protests about today, the Ubers. We are going to see small companies respond to the consultation.

Gareth Bacon AM: When you increased the operator fees by thousands of percent earlier this year, since then, by the end of February, 40 minicab firms in London had ceased trading. According to the Private Hire Licensing, Compliance and Enforcement report released by TfL yesterday, that number has increased to at least 57. Do you think that this policy is going to do anything to improve that situation?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): As you know, a number of minicab drivers work for more than one operator, so those figures do not reflect the number of operators who are still driving in inner London. You will be aware, for example, that many people who drive for Uber drive for other companies as well. The key reason behind these plans which we are consulting on is to reduce the number of PHVs coming into central London and to address the issue of congestion. I have given you the answer in relation to my opening question of the congestion that could be by 2041 if no action was taken. We are talking about a journey of 10kms taking an hour. We have to take action, and these plans which we are consulting on are one of the things we are doing to encourage people to use cars less in central London. The aim is by 2041 to have 80%

Page 17 of journeys either walking, cycling or public transport, and that public transport, by the way, is sustainable, which is very, very important.

Gareth Bacon AM: Mr Mayor, I think the need to reduce congestion in central London is something that most people will agree on, but I think what this exchange has shown is that actually this measure will have a very minor increase in congestion in central London, but the cumulative policies that are being put forward by TfL in your name are going to have an absolutely devastating impact on the private hire industry. They have already had to contend with massive increases in their licence fees, way, way, way disproportionate to the actual cost of implementing them. Now they are going to have to deal with this. Can you see why people would be forgiven, in particular the private hire industry, in believing that TfL is deliberately setting out to destroy their industry?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am sorry if people think that. That is why, if they do feel that, they should respond to the consultation on the plans we have consulted on. It is a fact, though, that between 2008 and 2016 the number of PHVs jumped from a figure approaching 50,000 to a figure approaching 120,000. You may think it is acceptable for that figure to keep on going higher and higher and higher and higher and higher and higher each year, but that is inconsistent with the point you claim to have made earlier on that you agree congestion is a problem. You cannot have it both ways. If you think congestion is a problem, you should want fewer vehicles in central London.

Gareth Bacon AM: Mr Mayor, my point is that this is going to do nothing to combat congestion. What it is going to do is drive the private hire industry companies out of business, but it is not going to do anything for congestion. The only upside that I can see for this is that it will raise an extra £30 million that TfL can chuck into the black hole that it has.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Again, the premise of the question has a number of red herrings in it which I will address. Firstly, the £1 billion figure is a figure that the previous Mayor had in his business plan. It was north of £1 billion in his business plan. Towards the end of his business plan, it was still going to be in deficit. Our business plan has a situation where, by the end of the business plan, that deficit becomes zero and then it becomes a surplus, which shows our plans to make TfL not have deficits of that figure but to have it in surplus.

Secondly, even by your own figures, you accept there will be a reduction in PHVs coming into central London, you accept that there will be less PHV traffic in central London, and you accept that there will be less overall traffic in central London. That is really important if we are going to address congestion.

Gareth Bacon AM: No. Actually, Mr Mayor, without you putting words in my mouth, I accept that this report states that. Bearing in mind this is the report that TfL is relying on to argue this policy, it is suggesting a tiny decrease in the amount of traffic in London, a very big impact on particularly the lower-paid PHV drivers, and an income in the tens of millions for TfL. For me, Mr Mayor, this does not really amount to a policy that ticks the boxes that you claim you are wanting to be ticking.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Is that a speech or a question, Chairman? I am unclear. You have probably ruled that in order as well.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): It is a rhetorical question.

Gareth Bacon AM: It does not need an answer.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Is that in order, then, is it?

Page 18

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): It is a rhetorical question, yes.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I encourage all the Labour Group to make rhetorical questions as well?

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): No, you do it, too.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Do I?

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Yes, you do.

Gareth Bacon AM: All the time.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): OK. Can we go on to the next question, please, President [Donald] Trump’s visit to London? It is Assembly Member Dismore’s question.

2018/1902 - President Trump’s visit to London Andrew Dismore AM

How much did the policing of President Trump’s visit to London cost; and how many dedicated ward officers were taken off their wards to police the visit?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. I am pleased that the MPS’s policing of the visit was a success and, in coming to London, President Trump experienced an open and diverse city that has always chosen unity over division and hope over fear. He will also no doubt have seen that Londoners hold their liberal values of freedom of speech very dear.

There is, however, a significant policing cost attributed to any event of this scale. The true cost will not be known for a few weeks while the MPS calculates the considerable overtime costs. I am pleased that positive conversations have already been had with the Home Office about a special grant application. It would be unacceptable if this is not approved and would be yet another financial pressure on the MPS’s already strained resources. This is an example of the disproportionate cost of policing that falls on London as the national capital, which central Government continually refuses to sufficiently fund. The National, International and Capital City (NICC) grant of £170 million is around half of the £340 million it costs to meet these demands. I will continue to press Government to fully fund these pressures to ensure we have enough police officers to keep our city safe and secure.

With regard to the abstraction of officers, I am proud to have restored neighbourhood police in London by doubling the number of dedicated officers in every ward, and these officers are now truly dedicated to the wards they police. Where in the past they were abstracted routinely, abstractions are now down to just 5%. We have always been clear that some abstractions will be needed to major events such as New Year’s Eve, the Notting Hill Carnival, and extraordinary visits such as this. The difference now is that local communities are told about abstractions and they will soon be able to be tracked online.

Across the Friday and Saturday, 242 DWOs were abstracted, 139 on the Friday and 103 on the Saturday. In both cases they came from the north and south of London. While any abstractions are unfortunate, good planning meant this was lower than it might have been. I want to thank all the officers and staff of the MPS for their work over a challenging few days and for everything they do to keep London safe and secure.

Page 19

Andrew Dismore AM: Thank you for that. Reports suggest that Police Scotland will receive £5 million from the Home Office towards the cost of the President’s private golf trip to Scotland, not that they could stop a paraglider protester anyway. I assume you have not received any assurances that the MPS will also be reimbursed for the full cost of policing the Trump visit, which was clearly going to be more than policing a golf course. Given the need to abstract DWOs from the boroughs to make up the 4,000 officers I believe that were required for President Trump’s visit to the capital at the same time as other major demands like Pride, World Cup crowds and so on, it really is important that the Government starts to properly fund the NICC, is it not?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You have articulated the reasons why we are frustrated at the failure to fund us as a National and International Capital City. Just think about the sporting events we have. Wimbledon has just finished. Think about the concerts we have. British Summer Time in Hyde Park. Just think about the visits we have, the parades we have, the protests we have. The Government has to recognise that funding us half of the amount that they accept that we need is not good enough. That is why it is really important that the Government funds us fully for the NICC, that it funds us properly in relation to the cuts it made over the last few years and reverses those cuts, but also realises our population is growing, but we get each day 1.5 million additional visitors, tourists, commuters coming into our city. Our city is not simply 8.9 million; it is that plus 1.5 million each day.

Andrew Dismore AM: Thank you.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): OK. Thank you very much. The next question is from Assembly Member Prince and it is on London’s bus mileage.

2018/1965 - London’s Bus Mileage Keith Prince AM

What percentage reduction in London’s total bus mileage has there been under your mayoralty?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Thank you for the question. The bus network is vital to London’s continued economic and social development and to meeting our target of 80% of Londoners’ journeys being made using sustainable transport by 2041. The bus network will be reshaped in inner London to reflect changing travel patterns and make it more reliable for passengers, while in outer London we want to increase capacity to support growth and get people out of their cars.

Talking purely about bus mileage does not give the full picture of how passengers use and experience the bus network. Since May 2016, TfL has reduced bus mileage by around 0.5%. TfL has put in 66 capacity increases under my Mayoralty to meet areas of growing demand. I have frozen TfL fares and started the unlimited Hopper to make bus travel more affordable. So far, more than 200 million Hopper journeys have been made. We know people are using other options to get around, particularly in central London, and with the new Hopper fare, changes to other parts of public transport are changing demand.

TfL also expects around 40 million journeys to transfer from the bus network to the Elizabeth line by 2021. In this context, TfL is working to modernise and simplify the bus network and make sure that it reflects changing travel patterns. TfL will continue to focus on journey times and reliability, both of which have improved over the past 12 months. This does mean bus mileage will be reduced in inner and central London where there is excess capacity. Certain corridors, like Kingsway, currently have more than 100 buses passing through every hour. This will bring benefits, including reduced congestion, lower emissions and better road safety. We have

Page 20 already reduced the number of buses that use Oxford Street by 40%, bringing benefits, and will continue to reduce this further.

In outer London there will be an overall increase in capacity. The network will be rebalanced to reduce congestion and duplication where buses go through the middle of town centres, creating a better network of routes across outer London, and TfL will be providing more detail on these plans in its business plan later this year.

TfL is required to consult on many types of structural changes to the network, but I want to go above and beyond that requirement. My Deputy Mayor for Transport [Heidi Alexander] and I have made very clear we want the extensive engagement with a wide range of stakeholders and customers about changes to the network.

Keith Prince AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. Can I actually start by congratulating you on putting on the England semi-final [football World Cup] event at Hyde Park? I thought it was an absolutely amazing event, and I think it really captured the spirit of Londoners and all our hopes and dreams, which were obviously shattered, but nonetheless, credit where it is due. I thought it was a wonderful event, and hats off to you for that one. That is the nice bit over.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): On that, Keith, just the last bit, the note you dropped me was very generous, and I have passed your note on to others to thank them for organising the event. I did pass on your email.

Keith Prince AM: Thank you. Yes. OK. You said that bus journeys have gone down by 0.5%, but TfL in the operational performance plan says that bus mileage kilometrage is going to go down by 6% from 2019 to 2020 from now. How do you offset that against your 0.5%?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The figure I have given you is from 2016 until now.

Keith Prince AM: I appreciate that.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It has gone down by 0.5%. What I am also clear about is there may be a reduction in mileage in inner-central London, but there needs to be an increase in outer London. I would say this, that the criteria for measuring success I think should not just be bus mileage. It should also be journey times. It should be reliability. It should be bus speed. It should be experience. All those things, the good news is, are improving and need to continue to improve.

Keith Prince AM: Would you add to that usage?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes. Some buses are very popular. We all get frustrated. You must have seen it - I have - when you see buses going along back-to-back and they are empty. When we talk about usage, we have to make sure buses are being used frequently. Sometimes you can have more usage by actually - it sounds perverse - reducing frequency. Rather than having three buses back-to-back, the same number coming at the same time, with clever use of satellite technology, if you were to have two buses but you were certain when they were going to arrive and you knew it was reliable to get from A to B, you would be more likely to use it. Sometimes we get obsessed by numbers and not looking at bus usage, and bus usage is determined often by reliability, if you can get from A to B in a certain time, and also the experience you have. Is it a clean bus? Is it cool? All those sorts of things.

Page 21 Keith Prince AM: When will we see the increase in bus kilometrage - I am not sure why we measure it in kilometrage, but we do - in outer London? When can we expect to see these additional buses or miles driven or whatever it is?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): If you remember, at previous MQTs Florence Eshalomi [AM] asked me a question about this and I could not give her an answer in relation to mileage in different parts of London, and I was frustrated by this. What I promised I would do is ask TfL, by the next business plan, to give you an idea of different parts of London. The short answer is, for the first time you will have the information out in more specific rather than pan-London, and we are hoping to see an increase. If there is a housing development which leads to passengers, customers, expect more buses to be there. We can work with boroughs in relation to the roads they control around town centres. You would expect to see increases there. Also, do not forget, because of the unlimited Hopper, particularly in outer London, people will jump on and off a bus that they would not otherwise do, so a bus does not need to get from start to destination because you can jump on and off. It does not necessarily mean more buses per se, but you have to see more passengers using them.

Keith Prince AM: Is that clear, then, that in spite of the savings you are clearly having to make, that you are committing to increasing the bus kilometrage - I do not know why we use that - in outer London? You are committed to more buses in outer London? Are you saying you would make more buses in outer London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I use mileage? It is just a bit easier. It just rolls off the tongue better. I would expect to see a reduction in central and inner London and an increase in outer London of bus mileage.

Keith Prince AM: We would expect to see that?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We would expect to see that, yes.

Keith Prince AM: Right. I just want to make sure, Mr Mayor, because I know this is a problem for some politicians, that your ‘woulds’ are your ‘woulds’, and they will not turn into ‘wouldn’ts’.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is a good question. Chairman, I know it is tongue in cheek but you are raising a really important point, because that is the intention. The phrase used before was, “Protecting our London services”. You are right. It is protecting what we had. Obviously, if passengers stopped using the buses, we are not going to run empty buses. The good news is, around the country, whereas we have seen a fall in bus usage roughly speaking of 2.2%, in London that fall was only 0.6%. One of the explanations, I am told, is we had a TfL fares freeze, whereas outside of London they increased bus fares by 4.4%. As long as passengers are using the buses, we would expect to see usage and mileage increase. Clearly, if it is the case, hypothetically, if no one is using the bus in outer London, we are not going to run the service. With those caveats, I would want to see an increase in outer London.

Keith Prince AM: We are not going to get the bus price reduction that you promised, the fares decrease you promised?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have had questions with a false premise. We are having promises that are just completely -- unless somebody can find a reference in my manifesto, I am not sure what the Assembly Member refers to.

Keith Prince AM: It was in your campaign papers that you put out, as one of your promises in your campaign paper that you put out, which admittedly now has a qualifier saying that all of these are no longer necessarily correct, but you did promise to reduce bus fares.

Page 22

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, I am not sure if that is a rhetorical question or not.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): I do not know what that was, no. Have you finished?

Keith Prince AM: I have finished, yes.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: I have raised the issue about cuts to bus services with you before. Your new Deputy Mayor [for Transport, Heidi Alexander] has agreed to review consultation on significant changes to bus frequency, and I have raised this with you previously. Do you now support this and are you looking at where you can consult and engage more with the community as you change services?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I always support my Deputy Mayor. You are right. You, Assembly Member Dismore, raised the issue of consulting on services changing.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Significant changes.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes. I think Heidi Alexander is quite keen to address some of those concerns, and what she wants to do is speak to you - I know Andrew Dismore [AM] has raised this as well - about how we can consult better, including your advice on who the key stakeholders are and what we use to do that, bearing in mind there are loads of changes taking place all the time for very good reasons. You are not suggesting all those are consulted or communicated upon, but I think your point, which is a good point, which I am highly persuaded by, is that we have to communicate better with the local communities. That could be the Assembly, councils, residents’ groups, community groups, accessibility groups, and on and on and on. I think she wants to work with you to improve communications and that is a good thing.

Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you very much.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. The next question is from Assembly Member O’Connell and it relates to public engagement with the police.

2018/1994 - Public engagement Steve O’Connell AM

What are you doing to encourage residents of London to engage with the police?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Modern policing relies on the consent and support of the public. How the police engage with the public is incredibly important. I know Assembly Member O’Connell is passionate about this, Chairman.

This starts at the most local level. In line with my commitment to restore real neighbourhood policing, every ward in London has been assigned at least two DWOs - that is 1,258 across London, double the number under the previous Mayor - alongside a key PCSO in every ward. Public engagement is a key element of the role of the DWOs, making regular visits to schools, colleges, places of worship and community hubs, through social media, ward panel meetings and street briefings, but I am not complacent. We can and will go further to embed DWOs in local communities.

Page 23 The consultation on the Public Access and Engagement Strategy in 2017 provided a lot of feedback on what is already working well and what is not. Since then, MOPAC and the GLA have been hosting a joint working group with the MPS to develop a new approach to public engagement. This new approach is based on an “inform, influence and involve” model, and the outcome of this work will be announced before the end of this financial year.

There already are many opportunities for the public to engage with the police and policing. For example, in the last two years, borough-level Safer Neighbourhood Boards have delivered over 350 public engagement opportunities where the police and the public have come together to address local problems and to share information and crime prevention advice. The Independent Custody Visiting Scheme brings together over 200 community volunteers who visit police detainees in pairs to ensure their rights and entitlements are being upheld by the police. MOPAC supports the borough stop and search community monitoring groups. These are groups of people from the local community who regularly scrutinise stop and search data and observe the use of stop and search powers during policing operations. More broadly, the police also engage members of the public with specific experience and expertise through Independent Advisory Groups, for example, and their Special Constable and Police Cadets offer valuable opportunities for the public to engage with the police on a variety of issues. I will continue to do all I can to support and encourage the public to engage with the police, and help from Assembly Members is greatly appreciated.

Steve O’Connell AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. The last Mayor, myself and other Members recognise the importance of engagement and local accountability. Indeed, he set a target that was far too optimistic but at least he indeed set a target. Would you not agree that more than ever, it is important to engage with Londoners over crime and safety through proper structures?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I agree, not just through proper structures but also informally as well. If we believe in policing by consent, and I know you do, we need the public to be police officers’ and PCSOs eyes and ears. There are formal structures, which are important. One of the things that the Engagement Strategy will be looking at is if there are other, informal routes. You have seen the advance on social media. You have also seen the importance of informal dialogues. It could be at school fairs, it could be at places of worship and other places as well. It is important to have structured consultation and engagement but also informal and fluid as well.

Steve O’Connell AM: You wrote to me in November 2017 on this subject saying that you would be publishing a full Community Engagement Strategy next year, ie this year. Are you saying, Mr Mayor, that in fact that is not going to happen and you will be launching this in 2019? It will be 2019-plus, will it not? Is it correct?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Analysing the feedback on the work from the Public Access and Engagement Strategy that we consulted on last year, a lot of that was based on front counters and police stations, which is different to the issue you and I are talking about in relation to engagement. We are keen to look at how best we can engage and get that out as soon as we can.

Steve O’Connell AM: OK. That is later than you said. I hosted with the previous Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime events in this building for Safer Neighbourhood Board Chairs, Ward Panel Chairs and Neighbourhood Watch Chairs. We were very conscious to support these volunteers. They are good people giving of their time. When did you last hold such an event and invite those good people into City Hall, in essence, perhaps, to even thank them for what they do?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You mean the Deputy Mayor?

Page 24

Steve O’Connell AM: Through you.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I do not have a date for when there was last one of those meetings but the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime and myself regularly meet these volunteers when we go around London.

Steve O’Connell AM: Yes. That is kind of ad hoc. I think it is right that these people are recognised, thanked and informed by yourself. I am disappointed that you have not invited them into this building. There are many people who volunteer to serve their communities.

I am pleased you mentioned that you are supportive of Safer Neighbourhood Boards. My colleague, Tony Devenish [AM], will be asking a few questions about a particular council that is intending to abolish Safer Neighbourhood Boards and Ward Panels. Would you not agree, Mr Mayor, that no councils have any authority to abolish boards that are indeed a mechanism of yourself and MOPAC?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are right, they are independent boards that a council cannot abolish, but if the council wants to find other ways to engage with the community we are happy to talk to the council.

Steve O’Connell AM: Confidence continues to flatline. I mentioned that the previous Mayor set the target. It was too high but at least it was an aspiration to improve the confidence of Londoners in their police. It continues to flatline around the mid to late 60s. Do you think that is an acceptable level?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, I want people to be completely happy with the police service and the work that we do, but the context is important. Our police officers are under-resourced and overstretched. I meet officers on a regular basis who have had rest days cancelled and who are working overtime. The ratio of officers to Londoners used to be four officers to 1,000 in 2010. It is now three officers to 1,000, eight years on. You can understand why members of the public are seeing fewer police officers. That is before you take into account the additional visitors, commuters and tourists we have here in London. I can understand why there has not been an improvement, and that is the context. That is why it is important that we try to get more resources and more police officers, so confidence grows.

Steve O’Connell AM: I do not necessarily see the connection between numbers on streets and confidence because it is a different process.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Let me explain why then. If it is the case, as is often said to us - you must have heard it - “I have not seen a police officer on my street for a while”. That leads to less confidence. The point I am making is that it may be factually correct that they have fewer police officers on their street for a while because of the cuts made by central Government. Confidence is not going down, it is remaining consistent, because of the hard work of the overstretched and under-resourced officers, a smaller number of officers, the fewest we have had since 2003, doing the work in a city where the population is growing.

Steve O’Connell AM: I would just conclude by suggesting that under your tenure, public engagement and confidence and the structures within have been unfortunately allowed to wither. I do not feel those volunteers sense they are being valued and supported as much as they should be by MOPAC and yourself and I would urge you, Mr Mayor, to ask your Deputy Mayor and MOPAC to revisit those Safer Neighbourhood Boards and Ward Panels - not forgetting Neighbourhood Watch, of course, which we are blessed with - to give them more support, not necessarily financial but support in their work, Mr Mayor. I would urge you that. You may wish to respond but that is all.

Page 25 Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, can I respond? I take the suggestion in the spirit it is meant, which is that we have people who volunteer because they believe in the community and it is important they are appreciated. Putting aside the knockabout stuff, I will take away the point that was made about appreciating volunteers, encouraging them and thanking them. It is really important we do that. Let me take that away. What I will do is get in touch with you about other ideas you may have to show volunteers they are valued and appreciated. They are valued. You are right, it is not just about resources, it is about them being good citizens and being appreciated for that.

Steve O’Connell AM: Thank you.

Tony Devenish AM: Mr Mayor, are you aware of what Hammersmith & Fulham Council is trying to do on this topic that Assembly Member O’Connell has just raised with you?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Do you mean the concerns around the Safer Neighbourhood Boards?

Tony Devenish AM: Yes. Yes, I do.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes, I am aware of the concerns around Safer Neighbourhood Boards.

Tony Devenish AM: Do you think it is appropriate that a council wants to try to merge a very well-functioning community organisation with all other areas of council services, be it environment, and they have written to us and said, homelessness, community safety, health and all the other issues? If it ain’t broke, why fix it?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, I think the issue is that the Council, not unreasonably, wants to make sure that the consultation and the engagement are good. I think the Council is seeking to make sure the public engagement works and so it is trying to make the Board more representative. The Chair of the Police and Crime Committee was right: the Council cannot disband an independent body. What a Council can do is seek to improve and finesse. If the process is not working, the consultation is not there and the Board is not representative, hypothetically speaking, then I think it is not improper for a Council to work with us to try to improve it.

Tony Devenish AM: As you have said to Assembly Member [Steve] O’Connell, will you talk to MOPAC, please, to defend the local Ward Panels as they are currently constituted, rather than allow a borough council leader to try to take it over?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think what we will do, Chairman, is talk to the Council about the concerns it has and seek to address those concerns. At the same time, the point made by the Chairman of the Police and Crime Committee was that we have to value and show our appreciation to the volunteers who work voluntarily because they believe in the community. We will seek to do all those things.

Tony Devenish AM: Thank you.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you. The next question on street pedestrianisation falls because Assembly Member Pidgeon is out of time. We go on to Brexit and security.

Page 26

2018/1919 - Brexit and Security Unmesh Desai AM

How are you and the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime working with the Met to prepare for the possibility of losing access to security arrangements such as the European Arrest Warrant and Europol after the UK leaves the European Union?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Brexit is a national challenge facing policing, and our security services and the MPS are working closely with the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC), who, alongside the National Crime Agency (NCA), have established a team to drive and co-ordinate Brexit contingency planning for UK law enforcement. This team is working closely with the Home Office and the Department for Exiting the EU to understand and prepare for the effects of Brexit on UK security. My Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime and I meet the MPS Commissioner regularly to discuss a broad range of issues, including the potential impact of Brexit on the safety and security of Londoners.

I also recently met with the now former Secretary of State for Exiting the EU, [The Rt. Hon] David Davis MP, to emphasise to him the need for a deal that ensures prosperity and security for London. On the day I met with him, Michel Barnier [EU Chief Brexit Negotiator] was clear that as a third country the UK will be outside these vital arrangements. I am, therefore, seeking an urgent meeting with the new Secretary of State, [The Rt. Hon] Dominic Raab MP, to discuss these matters.

It is clear that the Government has not prioritised the issue of security. I have set out what I think are the six key measures we should be seeking to remain part of: the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol), the European Arrest Warrant, the Schengen Information System II (SIS II), EU Passenger Name Records, the European Criminal Records Information System, and the Prüm arrangements. The Government position is putting them at risk.

The MPS Commissioner recently stated to the Police and Crime Committee that any alternatives to the loss of existing tools would be “clunkier, clumsier and more expensive”. Any lessening in our access to the European Arrest Warrant, Europol or SIS II database will not only create more work for our already stretched police officers but will almost certainly lead to delays on information sharing and easier rides for criminals. The inevitable consequences will mean Londoners are less safe and I refuse to believe anyone voted for that.

Unmesh Desai AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. The Home Affairs Select Committee report into security arrangements post-Brexit, which came out earlier this year, concluded, and I quote,

“The public debate on this aspect of Brexit has been seriously lacking in detail and urgency.”

Do you share this assessment? Do you think that security concerns have not been given enough consideration in the various debates? I hear what you have said, all the representations you have been making and all the meetings that you have had. Do you feel that much more can be done to stimulate this debate?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I do not think there has been enough discussion about the concerns around security post-Brexit and I do not think the Government is taking it seriously and prioritising it, but we should realise that police officers and Chief Constables cannot be advocates publicly. They can respond to questions that the Police and Crime Committee ask and they can respond to Select Committees but they cannot lobby like the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), London First, the Chamber of Commerce, the

Page 27 Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) or others can. Our job as politicians is to be their advocates and to explain their concerns around security post-Brexit. That is why I am pleased you asked the question.

Unmesh Desai AM: Again, I have heard what you said in your answer but can you very specifically put on record the impact of losing all these various databases for London and Londoners? Have you made any specific representations, either you or your Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, to keep access to these vital security arrangements?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have. I have had a full presentation given to me by the expert who leads on this from the MPS to the NPCC and in my meeting with [The Rt. Hon] David Davis [MP] I impressed upon him the importance of these and the concerns we have.

Let me give you one example in relation to what we would lose. In 2017, the SIS II database was searched automatically 539 million times by law enforcement people. Let me give you another one: 1,735 criminals were arrested using the European Arrest Warrant in 2017. Europol supported 600 operations. Here are examples of how, operationally, the EU assists us in relation to security and policing. If it is the case that we are a third party, we cannot have access to this on the same terms. [Michel] Barnier has confirmed that. The Government has to realise that they need a plan to address these concerns.

Unmesh Desai AM: Thank you. You just told us, and I quote, “The Government has not prioritised the issue of security”, and in your opening statement earlier this morning you asked the Prime Minister to put the national interest before her own interest. You also said to put country before party. Do you feel that the infighting that we are seeing within the Cabinet and the Conservative Party is damaging our chances of achieving a deal on security arrangements? Does it help?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It does not help. People in Brussels watch what is happening in London and are astounded: astounded that Article 50 was served without the Government having any plans for what the destination was going to be and astounded that, a year and a half after negotiations began, the person in charge of it has resigned and somebody else has taken over at the eleventh hour. He is now in charge of delicate negotiations that must end by the end of October [2018]. Why? Because the European institutions and the British Parliament need time to vote on these before the end of March [2019].

We have no details of what the plans are going to be in relation to security arrangements. Think about it. On a day-to-day basis, it will mean that the police’s ability and the security services’ ability to keep us safe is less good than it was before we left the EU. That cannot be right and no one is talking about it.

Unmesh Desai AM: I should just say, Chairman, that the Police and Crime Committee will be looking at this issue in some detail later on this year. Thank you.

2018/1993 - Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation Shaun Bailey AM

Do you agree that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation represents a fantastic opportunity to build thousands of homes for London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Thank you for the question.

Page 28 Yes, I do. It is an opportunity that I am determined should not be wasted and one that the Government should back too. My draft new London Plan has identified that the Old Oak and Park Royal area has the capacity to deliver at least 25,000 homes by 2028. This area can become an amazing new part of London, built around what is planned to be the largest station to be built in the UK in a century. The regeneration of Old Oak and Park Royal can play a significant role in meeting both London-wide and local housing need, including genuinely affordable homes, homes for families and specialist homes, all provided as part of a mixed and balanced community.

The Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) is planning for the delivery of about 1,000 homes a year, which will be delivered in line with my housing policies. We are aiming for 50% of these homes to be affordable, which would mean the delivery of 10,000 new genuinely affordable homes in the area by 2038, but this is a complex site and needs a lot of infrastructure to make a viable proposition. We are working with the OPDC to prepare a detailed business case for support from the Government’s Housing Infrastructure Fund for £250 million to unlock this important site and kickstart delivery. We are looking for a positive outcome to this by the end of the year. The sooner a positive decision is taken by the Government, the sooner we can kick off delivery. As part of this, the OPDC team is working with existing landowners and with High Speed 2 (HS2) to plan for this area in a comprehensive way. This will ensure we can get the best outcome for Londoners.

Shaun Bailey AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. When was the last time you met with Liz Peace CBE [Chairman, OPDC] or Michael Mulhern [Interim Chief Executive Officer, OPDC]?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think I saw Liz [Peace CBE] a couple of weeks ago. I can send you the exact date but quite recently.

Shaun Bailey AM: Your comments would suggest that you are well aware that they have submitted a bid to the Government’s Housing Infrastructure Fund for £250 million for infrastructure. Obviously, you are aware of that. I am just going by my questions here. If this bid is unsuccessful, what will you be doing to help support the infrastructure planned on that site? Obviously, you said it is complicated but they do need to get this infrastructure done. What will your office do about that?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We hope it is successful. Our officials have been working closely with officials at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, in consultation with the Treasury as well, and so we are confident it will be successful. If it was not successful, hypothetically speaking of course, we would want to know why and what concerns the Government had because this is an ideal case for infrastructure funding. A lot of the land that needs to be unlocked needs things like new bridges, new roads, new utilities and land assembly, the things that the planning authority, the Development Corporation and the Mayor cannot do by ourselves. I would be surprised if we were not successful and if we were, we would have to consider why we were not.

Shaun Bailey AM: We all hope we are successful - let us just put it out there - but of course if your office had done more we would not have to wait to see if we are successful. There are a number of things. There was a plan, I think in 2016, around the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). People talked about it raising £380 million. That would have been more than enough to deliver this infrastructure. What happened to that plan? Why was it not pursued? Where is it now?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am not sure what plan you are referring to. What we have done is the OPDC has undertaken a review and there were concerns in relation to the previous deal done by the Mayor, for example with Network Rail, the lack of planning that we had for --

Page 29

Shaun Bailey AM: No. Sorry, Mayor, just to help you out here, as a planning authority, the OPDC can bring forward a CIL. They had a plan for a CIL. People talked about £380 million happening. What has happened to that plan? Where has it gone? Why has your office not pursued it? Why have they not pursued it? That would have answered this question and we would be well on our way to getting out 11,000 homes.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is a development corporation, just to explain to you what it is. OPDC is a development corporation.

Shaun Bailey AM: I understand that.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Right. The way the CIL works, let me explain, is that it is a levy applied for infrastructure --

Shaun Bailey AM: Sorry, Mayor, I understand that. What I am saying is that there was already a plan for a CIL. It was started in 2016. What happened to it? Where has that plan gone now? Why was that money not pursued? We would not be having this conversation about Government infrastructure planning because we would have had the money already. We would have been able to do it with our own money in London.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I was explaining, Chairman, about three minutes ago about the review but I will try again. There was a review undertaken in 2016 and 2017 around the OPDC and the recommendations of the review have been acted upon in relation to how we can get development on this site. Already we have started development on parts of the site where there is no need for the infrastructure that we are required to undertake. In parts of the north of the site, we have already seen the work on commercial space undertaken, we have already seen homes brought forward and we are receiving planning permission granted for more homes. A lot of the site, particularly the western site, needs serious investment and the Housing Infrastructure Fund is what we have applied for to get that investment.

It is possible to use the CIL to fund infrastructure projects in appropriate sites. On this particular site, the CIL is not appropriate. There is also the Neighbourhood Community Infrastructure Levy as well, which we can use.

Shaun Bailey AM: Why is it not appropriate for a CIL? What happened to the plan? The plan seems to have disappeared. If you are saying it is not appropriate, could you just let me know why?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The way the CIL generally works is for businesses to come forward and contribute, whether it is planning gain or other forms, the infrastructure required to make a site ready for development. A review was undertaken of how we could speed up and accelerate the OPDC. We have had conversations with the Department for Transport (DfT) in relation to the Network Rail land, you will be aware, in relation to the development around HS2, and the depot in relation to the Elizabeth line as well. There is work being undertaken here. For the reasons set out in the review, which I can send you a copy of --

Shaun Bailey AM: Please do because none of that explains adequately why the CIL was not pursued and that has just died. Just moving on there in the interests of time, if we are not successful - and again, we all hope we are - do you have a plan B? Does OPDC have a plan B? Are we at risk here of losing all these houses? You are under pressure to deliver your own target. Is there a plan B?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We are in danger of repeating the answer I gave to the previous question. In answer to your previous question about plan B, I am hopeful and confident in relation to the submission we have made to Government. If we are not successful, we would want to ask the Government why we were not

Page 30 successful and what the reasons were. Obviously, if we are successful it generates interest from the private sector as well and it means we can unlock some of this land. On the other pots of money, we are using to invest in this site, for example, for those sites coming forward we are using some of our Affordable Housing Fund to make sure that half the homes that are brought forward are affordable housing. We have already had some homes brought forward with between 30% and 40% affordable housing, which is progress being made. We would want to see the reasons the Government said no and then try to address those.

Shaun Bailey AM: Mr Mayor, we understand the sites and we like that you have an affordable housing target but none of that sounds like a plan B. You have been given £4.82 billion to spend on delivering housing. Have you written to the Government to ask if you can use some of that money for this infrastructure? £250 million would only be just over 5%. Have you asked that question?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The rules for the Affordable Housing Grant are quite clear. Let me explain them to you.

Shaun Bailey AM: No, I understand the rules and I know they are very clear. What I am asking is: you do not seem to have a plan B, so have you written just to ask the question? It would just be a letter. You could say to the Government, “We could potentially be opening 11,000 or some estimates say 12,000 homes here”. Have you written, just to ask the question of if you could redirect a small proportion of that money to open this?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Let me explain to you why we have not, which is very simple. The amount of money we have from the Government is to start 116,000 homes by 2022. Many of the homes we are talking about here on this site will not be ready until the late 2020s and early 2030s. I suspect some people may want affordable homes sooner rather than later, which is why it is important that the £4 billion we have secured from the Government is used to make housing starts between now and 2022.

Shaun Bailey AM: I understand.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You claim to understand but clearly you do not.

Shaun Bailey AM: What you seem not to understand is that you have the opportunity here to deliver these houses in that timeframe and you are not pursuing it. We all know we have a desperate need for housing in London. You could be doing something very quickly here and you are not. It sounds like it is because they will not be delivered in your current term. That is enough from me, Chairman.

Tony Devenish AM: I am very pleased with the progress on OPDC, in partnership working with different parts of Government. Can I take you back to the point I made right at the beginning of today in terms of the Church Street redevelopment? A similar part of west London, a great scheme. You had offered kindly to give us £23.5 million, as Westminster City Council. My leader phoned me just before MQT to say it has been withdrawn because we have not balloted. We have balloted. Can I ask you to please look at the facts again and reconsider your decision? Church Street, as I am sure you know, is a very deprived part of London, one of the ten poorest council wards. It is a Labour ward, by the way, and we want this housing. There are over 892 houses, 50% of them affordable. It is clearly something we can work on together. I know we have had an argument between the Council and you recently on other issues but surely this should not be politics.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, I am sure this question must be in order because you have allowed it. Let me deal with the question. You will be aware, Chairman, because we have raised it at previous MQTs, that we have been consulting on plans around estate regeneration. Up until now, the Mayor and City

Page 31 Hall in previous administrations have crossed their arms and done nothing about involving local residents in plans to regenerate their estates.

Last year I consulted on plans to involve Londoners more in estate regeneration. The point I made a number of MQTs ago when I announced this was that when it comes to money from City Hall being used to regenerate an estate, the expectation was that there would be a ballot of residents if you want to secure monies from City Hall. If it is the case that any council wants to regenerate an estate and they want money from City Hall, they need to make sure they ballot their residents.

If residents were consulted four, five or six years ago in a previous scheme, and it is the case that this scheme is very popular and needed, I am not sure why the Council would be scared to re-consult and to ballot its residents. I am surprised that a councillor who claims to be in tune with her residents is so nervous about balloting residents on plans to regenerate an estate, which in itself begs a number of questions.

Tony Devenish AM: I will leave it there because of time.

2018/1844 - EU Workers Fiona Twycross AM

The Office for National Statistics has found that there has been a 43 per cent drop of the number of EU citizens coming to work in the UK since the referendum. What is the impact of this in London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Thank you for your question. Recent estimates from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show a sharp fall in net international migration to London, down by more than a quarter between 2016 and 2017. This is the result of a fall in the number of people coming here from abroad and a large increase in those choosing to either move overseas or return to their home country. At a national level, the ONS has previously identified that over three-quarters of falling net migration is made up by EU citizens. The UK has also seen a large drop in the number of people immigrating here from abroad in order to look for work, especially from the EU. These dramatic shifts, which began after the EU referendum, are influenced by the change in the international perception of the UK as a place welcoming to people from around the world.

The fact that large numbers of EU citizens are now either leaving London or not coming here at all is deeply concerning. As evidenced in my submissions to the Migration Advisory Council’s review of Brexit’s impact on the labour market, people born in the rest of the European Economic Area (EEA) make up a hugely important part of London’s workforce. They account for approximately 750,000 jobs in London’s economy and are, on average, more qualified than their UK counterparts.

My London is Open campaign has worked to challenge these negative and misleading perceptions and I have committed to launch a portal to help Europeans stay in the UK after Brexit, but I have been frustrated by the Government’s failure to properly support EU citizens. The new offer of settled status should have been made much earlier and must at the very least be free to those who arrived here before the referendum. I also believe it is misguided for the Government not to extend an unconditional offer of settled status to EU citizens currently in the UK, regardless of the outcome of the negotiations. While it is important to ensure that UK workers have the training they need to engage fully in the modern economy, immigration from the EU and the rest of the world would always play a vital part in bridging London’s skill gap. I will continue to press the Government to do more to reverse this worrying trend in migration and to ensure that the post-Brexit immigration provides the flexibility that London’s businesses need.

Page 32

Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you. I noted from my social media that it is two years since you launched the videos around the London is Open campaign. It is a campaign that is needed even more so today, in some ways, than it was then. How are you making London an attractive place for EU citizens to come and live and work?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): First, what we say and how we conduct ourselves is really important. The impression that some people outside of our country have post-Brexit is that we have become inward-looking and insular, which is the very opposite of what we are: open-minded, outward-looking and pluralistic. It is really important that we espouse our values.

We also have to address the underlying issues of why people find it difficult to live in London. I do not apologise for freezing our transport fares in TfL. Some were against that. Some were happy to increase them further. There was a 42% increase in the previous eight years before I became Mayor. It is important that we address the issue of people who work hard getting a decent day’s work. You have been an advocate for the London Living Wage. We need more employers to pay the London Living Wage. It is important we address the issue of lack of affordable housing in London. That is why we are trying to make sure we build more genuinely affordable homes and address the issue of the rental market as well.

One of the things you have talked about and we have all talked about is the consequences of a hostile environment. The hostile environment is felt by people who are originally from other parts of the country, not just those of the Windrush generation but EU citizens as well. How the Home Secretary responds to the fiasco, the shameful saga of Windrush, will determine the views of those in the EU as well. It is really important that they understand that.

Fiona Twycross AM: I am pleased that you raised the tonal aspect of whether or not people choose to stay or come here in the first place. You will be aware of the report that came out overnight about Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) saying that police forces should improve their response to hate crime and get ready for an upsurge when the UK formally leaves the EU next March. Will you speak to the Commissioner of the MPS about what specific plans she will have in place to prevent this? What do you think we can do as politicians representing London, including all the EU citizens and people from other parts of the world, to make sure that the right tone is set for maintaining that sense that London really is open?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you for your question and the way you asked it. First, language matters. It matters. Tone matters. The words you use matter. It is important that we realise that as politicians, people look to us for leadership and we provide positive leadership. It is important we act responsibly. I will raise with the [MPS] Commissioner the report from the Inspectorate which came out last night. It was interesting because what the Inspectorate has done is looked at examples of where there have been spikes - and there have been spikes; some people deny there have been spikes but there have been spikes in relation to hate crime - and also predict, based on past evidence, the possibility of a further increase, which is on the day we leave the EU. We now know, based on previous evidence, that there is a possibility there could be an increase in hate crime, so we should do something about that.

The most important thing we can do is provide solidarity, in the sense of fraternity, to those who are feeling scared, who are feeling vulnerable. It is really important that they realise we are with them. They could be members of our family, our neighbours, friends or people we work with. We have to let them know we are with them and we will make sure that we are by their side. We have to make sure that there is not this increase in hate crime we have seen in the past.

Page 33

It does not need to be this way. Just because it has happened in the past does not mean in the future there needs to be a spike. I am looking to our city to be a beacon to show not just the rest of the country but the rest of the world how we do not just tolerate difference, we celebrate, embrace and respect it.

Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you.

Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Thank you, Chairman. Mr Mayor, as we are not attracting people from the EU to come and join us, particularly in the health and social care sector, and we are relying on non-EU countries to provide a skilled workforce to us, particularly doctors, nurses and teachers, do you think the Government’s loosening of the immigration cap for doctors has gone far enough from London’s point of view?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The answer is no. Let me just give you a number: 14% of jobs in London are done by those in the EEA outside our country, and 26% are done by those outside the EEA. Now, I am not saying we must not skill up Londoners to have those jobs. We have to do both. You will be aware of the vacancies in the NHS, including in the medical profession. It takes years to train doctors. We cannot overnight pull a lever. What is the answer? We have to make it attractive for experts from overseas, doctors, to come to our country. Simply lifting the cap will not be enough. You know of the resources that have been starved from trusts and their inability to make decent job offers. What is happening? These doctors, who are skilled and experienced, are going where? Australia, Canada, New York, New Zealand. We want them to come here.

Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Mr Mayor, as we celebrate the 70th anniversary of the NHS this year, I am sure you will join me in thanking all those who have worked and are working for the NHS and also recognising the huge contribution made to the NHS since its inception in 1948 by people who have come to this country, to these shores, and added to the NHS, particularly those who came on the Windrush and the doctors who worked in the most deprived areas of London. I hope you will join me in recognising their contribution also to the NHS, those who have been the backbone of the NHS since 1948.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Doctor, you were with other Assembly Members at the reception upstairs, organised by UNISON, to celebrate the 70th birthday of the NHS. The point I made during my short remarks was that it cannot be a coincidence that the Windrush arrived 70 years ago, we celebrate 70 years of Windrush and the NHS is 70 years old and we celebrate 70 years of the NHS. Immigration has been a huge benefit to our city and country economically, socially and culturally, but also the NHS is built on the foundations of immigration from the Commonwealth, including those who came on the Windrush. Doctors, nurses, healthcare workers, porters, cleaners and others who are part of the NHS family, all of them are an integral part of the NHS being a success for years. I look forward to the next period of celebrating the success of the NHS, which means not simply celebrating the workers and making sure they are treated with dignity but investing in NHS as well and putting our money where our mouth is.

Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much.

Page 34

2018/1807 - Uber Florence Eshalomi AM

Please update me on the current situation surrounding Uber and their Private Hire Operators Licence?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Thank you for the question. I fully supported TfL’s decision to refuse Uber a private hire operating licence last September [2017]. Those who criticised that decision should note that Uber has now accepted that TfL’s decision was entirely justified. When TfL made its decision, Uber was taking a highly lax approach to public safety. The lack of proactive reporting of alleged crimes to the police was extremely alarming, a view also shared by the MPS. TfL made it crystal clear that safety must be at the top of the agenda for all operators.

This has now been vindicated by the recent court judgment. At the appeal, the magistrate agreed that Uber was not a fit and proper person to hold a licence at the time of TfL’s decision in September [2017]. The company’s previous approach showed a total disregard for the rules by which everyone in the industry must play. Uber thought it was too big and too powerful to be held to the same standards as everyone else. It was dismissive and misleading, lacking the openness and transparency that is expected in London.

As a result of big changes implemented by Uber since TfL’s decision, the magistrate concluded that Uber had provided sufficient evidence to the court that it was now a fit and proper person to hold an operating licence. Uber was therefore granted a 15-month licence by the magistrate, shorter than what it wanted, and it set up stringent conditions that TfL will thoroughly monitor and enforce. They also had to pay all of TfL’s legal costs, amounting to £425,000.

Uber is now on probation. It has been forced to overhaul its culture and ethos. It is actually making changes globally. It has appointed three non-executive directors to the Uber London Board and introduced new arrangements to ensure that the rules in London are fully observed. Uber has also introduced new systems for the proactive reporting of allegations straight to the police. Uber now has to prove that it has truly changed in order to hold on to its licence. It must demonstrate that it can play by the rules.

TfL’s original decision and the court’s judgment show that in London regulation now works and is an integral part of keeping Londoners safe. As Mayor, I am working hard to ensure that London continues to be at the forefront of innovation and a natural home for new and exciting companies, but everyone has to play by the rules.

Florence Eshalomi AM: Thank you for that, Mr Mayor. I think it is right that the safety of drivers and passengers is paramount and that TfL took this action. As a result of the ruling, you will be aware that Uber has to now start reporting any serious crimes that involve passengers directly to the police, rather than the ridiculous situation where victims were having to report that crime to the police. Have you had any reassurances from Uber on any way that it will make sure this works and that it is going to adhere to this?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are right, the position before was not tenable. There were big concerns from the police, TfL and ourselves. The magistrate laid down a number of stringent conditions and they include, as you say, proactive reporting to TfL and the police. These will be regularly checked. I think every six months they will be regularly checked by TfL. TfL as the regulator takes its role very seriously. I have been reassured that TfL will closely monitor Uber’s adherence to the conditions and - I will be frank - take appropriate action if the required standards are not met.

Page 35

Florence Eshalomi AM: I know that TfL’s ruling was solely based on safety but one of the things that we looked at on the Transport Committee and in the Labour Group was the poor working practices for drivers. There were some really shocking conditions coming through. One of the conditions of the new agreement was that Uber would not circumvent obligations such as medical declarations. Again, are you satisfied that drivers will be tested? If not, will they be retested?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): This is a really important point. There was a concern about those who had been passed, in inverted commas, ‘medically fit’, had not had a proper examination in person. We were hearing stories about Skype interviews and all the rest of it. TfL has identified all the applicants and licensed drivers with whom there were concerns around their medicals and they have undertaken a new medical with a general practitioner (GP) rather than what was being done before by Uber. Uber understands that from now onwards, any new driver or those whose licence is being renewed must make sure they do proper medicals rather than the ones that were taking place before.

Florence Eshalomi AM: That is good. We will, on this side, definitely continue to monitor those 14 conditions set by TfL. I think it is right that any decision to extend its licence should again come back to TfL and the Committee.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I just say this? It is an example where - Chairman, if I may - we should be encouraged and proud of London’s response. For too long cities around the world were scared to take on the new big boys and girls, and last September, doing this properly, TfL made a decision and we stood by TfL. There were others who were saying that we had made a bad decision, and others who were using all sorts of other theories why we had taken the decision to stand by TfL. There were concerns about ‘chumocracies’ in relation to the relationship between the previous administration, members of a certain political party and Uber. We have shown how things should be done. The rest of the world has taken note and has followed our lead, but also Uber has changed the way they operate around the world. The global chief executive officer (CEO) deserves credit, I think.

Florence Eshalomi AM: Yes, definitely. Thank you, Mr Mayor.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much.

2018/1829 - Culture for All Londoners Navin Shah AM

Outer London is struggling to maintain and enhance the culture and creative industries due to austerity measures. How will your strategic vision for London’s culture provide better access to those living in outer London, particularly young people?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Government cuts to local authorities are having a profound effect on arts and culture, with a national fall of £236 million since 2010. London has been one of the hardest hit with funding levels shrinking by nearly one fifth. Government cuts have also shut down 81 youth clubs and projects in London since 2011, leaving many young people with nowhere to go.

However, I have made culture a priority. Through our flagship London Borough of Culture we are supporting five outer London boroughs with £3 million to help local people take part in the culture on their doorsteps. This includes £1.35 million each for Waltham Forest and Brent. Through the new Cultural Impact Awards we

Page 36 are supporting outer London projects with £290,000. For example, in Barking and Dagenham looked-after children will design their own cultural programme. In Kingston - I am told, Chairman, Kingston is the London home of reggae - there will be a brand new music festival, and in Merton -- the answer says. I know. I worry that there was not proper fact-checking taking place but I am told it is the London home of reggae. In Kingston there will be a brand new music festival and in Merton our funding will help address the borough’s shortage of cinemas.

At the grassroots, we have given over £75,000 to community-led projects through my new £1 million Culture Seeds programme. Almost half of these are in outer London. Nurturing young talent is also crucial. We are supporting young musicians through the Londonwide Gigs programme and young music scholars through the London Music Fund. Our Fourth Plinth Schools Award this year received almost 4,000 entries from schools in every London borough.

Culture is also central in regeneration. We have given £5.9 million of Good Growth funding to cultural projects in outer London boroughs and through our new Cultural Enterprise Zones we help young creative people and businesses in outer London put down roots. £330,000 of development funding to help shape new zones and in Haringey £650,000 will also be spent on a new skills and training programme. At East Bank, Chairman, in the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, we are invested £385 million. This is the most significant single investment in London since the legacy of the 1851 Great Exhibition, which bequeathed us the Victoria and Albert Museum (V&A), the Science Museum and the Natural History Museum. This is just a snapshot of what we are doing to support young people in outer London.

Navin Shah AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor, for delivering some great news about what you are doing to enhance culture in outer London boroughs. I would like to, on that, recommend the Regeneration Committee’s report, Creative Tensions, which was published last year. There are two specific recommendations, numbers 4 and 6, on outer London, which I hope your draft report on culture will seriously address.

The specific issue about safeguarding culture facilities in outer London, in particular funding for local councils on heritage and museums, is a big problem. Outer London boroughs are finding it difficult to sustain those kinds of heritage buildings. Is this something that you will look into to see how you can support it?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): First, I have to be candid. We cannot replace for councils the money that has been lost from central Government. We just cannot. What we can do is try to help councils. We are working with some boroughs in relation to Culture at Risk. We have set up a Culture at Risk office that works with boroughs and what I would suggest, if there are particular examples, is working with the Culture at Risk office and Deputy Mayor for Culture and the Creative Industries Justine Simons’ team about specific examples. We already have examples where the Night Czar and Justine have worked with premises that are at risk. On those examples around heritage, please speak with them and they will see what they can do. Sometimes it is convenient signposting that is helping, sometimes it is funding. We will see what we can do.

Navin Shah AM: I do have an example. In Harrow, a local arts centre is a fabulous grade 1 listed building, I think, which has been under threat for a number of years. Something needs to be done. Thanks for that. I will contact the Deputy Mayor.

Last but not least, the second facet of my question related to young people. Will you ensure, Mr Mayor, that your Cultural Infrastructure Plan takes a proactive approach to ensure that more young people have good access to culture and that the programme is developed by engaging with them to see what they aspire to?

Page 37 Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Absolutely. The good news is, just so that you are aware, that the bits from both Waltham Forest and Brent, who were the successful boroughs in 2019 and 2020 for the first ever London Borough of Cultures, took on board views of young people in their respective boroughs. It is really crucial that we have young people’s views taken aboard. It cannot be middle-aged men dictating to young people what their culture should be. We have to involve them in their views and emerging cultural views as well.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): The question on Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) is withdrawn, so the next question is on homelessness and it is from Assembly Member Copley.

2018/1912 - Homelessness Tom Copley AM

I welcome your announcement of an extra £3.3 million to tackle rough sleeping in London. However, how far will this go towards providing a long term, sustainable route off the streets for all rough sleepers without support from the Government?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you for your question. First, I hope the experience of the new Housing Minister [Kit Malthouse MP], the fifth since I became Mayor, in the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) means he fully appreciates the negative impact welfare reform is having on homelessness. Soon after becoming Mayor, we set up a new No Nights Sleeping Rough taskforce, chaired by James Murray, my Deputy Mayor for Housing. This brings together key partners from boroughs, charities and others who have been working hard to tackle this complex problem. Last year, for the first time in a decade, we saw a fall in the number of people seen sleeping rough in London, but it is still unacceptable that 7,400 people slept rough last year, more than double the number when my predecessor [Boris Johnson MP] became Mayor.

We are still at crisis point and it is our moral responsibility to act. We have now invested £8.5 million a year in core services, an extra £4.2 million we secured from Government in 2016 and a further £3.3 million secured in June [2018]. This latest money means we can double the number of outreach workers this autumn, boost local winter and emergency shelters, expand No Second Night Out (NSNO) and fund a specialist mental health team for rough sleepers.

There is still much more to do. We need more resources to help people off the streets to help prevent rough sleeping and offer people the right onward accommodation and support. That is why last month we published London’s first ever Rough Sleeping Plan of Action. This sets out what we will do with our current resources, but it is also very clear about how Government needs to step up by investing £100 million a year over five years and by addressing the root causes of homelessness, including welfare cuts and insecurity of the private rented sector.

Ministers’ press releases have said their National Strategy will be published in July [2018]. I hope they will not let that date slip. I also hope their Strategy will show they are serious about both committing the funding we need to truly tackle rough sleeping and about honestly assessing and then changing Government policies that have caused homelessness to rise to such crisis levels.

Tom Copley AM: Thank you very much for that answer, Mr Mayor, and of course we all welcome the recent fall we have seen in rough sleeping after many years of it sadly increasing. Of course, looking into those figures, I think a lot of the fall was from EU citizens. There has still been a rise in UK nationals. Could you offer an explanation for that, about whether that suggests more structural issues, and set out a bit how some

Page 38 of the very welcome money you have secured from the Government is going to help get these people off London streets?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are right, if we do a deep-dive into the figures, there has been a reduction in EU rough sleepers. The increase in UK citizens has been less high than in previous years, so we are seeing some improvement there as well. You are right to refer to the long-term structural issues. We know what they are, speaking to those at the coalface, and we are taking steps to address those. We do need more affordable housing and increased supply. We need to reform the private rental sector so that it offers secure and affordable long-term tenancies for residents.

We also need to make sure there is proper mainstream advice and support for those who became rough sleepers. Think of the issues around substance abuse and mental health issues. The fourth part of the equation is welfare reforms. There is a direct link between the Government’s welfare reform changes and an increase in rough sleeping. You cannot run away from that. What I am pleased by is senior civil servants are now looking into link. The Minister, if you remember, denied there being a link. The good news is the civil service is looking into the link between benefits and rough sleeping, and we think that might lead to, we hope, a change in Government policy.

Tom Copley AM: I really hope so. You bring me on to the issue of Universal Credit. I visited a drop-in centre recently in a borough that is trialling the roll-out of Universal Credit. They said they had suddenly started getting people who were not actually homeless coming to them for food because they were waiting so long before they got their first payment under Universal Credit. This is a major, major problem, given the Government is continuing to roll this out across London, despite all of the warnings, most recently from the National Audit Office (NAO). Have you made any assessment of the impact of a full roll-out of Universal Credit on homelessness in London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We had some numbers from the pilot in London, which caused concern, and I made representations to the Secretary of State suggesting it delay the roll-out until it had ironed out the problems there were in the pilots. The whole idea of pilots is you pilot it, you see the problems and you iron them out before you roll it out. It decided not to do so. Therefore, we are doing some work in relation to two things. One is we welcome the Government’s agreement to have a senior civil servant committed to looking at the connection between benefits and homelessness. Secondly, our own officers are doing some work around scoping. I will have them speak with you in relation to how they can do some research about the link between Universal Credit and rough sleeping, the benefit system and rough sleeping.

The obvious example is if there is a big delay and a time lag between receiving a benefit, it is not surprising, particularly in the private rental sector, if the landlord does not want to wait a long period of time and somebody is made homeless. It is very important to realise you can prevent this rather than picking up the pieces afterwards. That is why the work James Murray is doing, leading the taskforce around No First Night Sleeping Rough, is really important. That is working with other authorities, charities and others to stop people becoming rough sleepers in the first place.

Tom Copley AM: Thank you for that answer and that offer.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): The next question is from Assembly Member Twycross and relates to the NHS70 Parliamentary Awards.

Page 39

2018/1848 - NHS@70 Parliamentary Awards Fiona Twycross AM

Will the Mayor join me in congratulating the nominees, from across London, for the NHS70 Parliamentary Awards? What challenges do you see for the NHS over the next 70 years and how can we make sure that we are united to have the best health service in London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. I would like to congratulate the two London winners of the NHS70 Parliamentary Awards, Professor Shafi Ahmed at Barts, and Islington GP Federation. I want to thank the extraordinary NHS staff who provide brilliant care to patients and whose hard work and dedication are instrumental in keeping NHS running during some challenging times.

We have a growing population in London and widening differences in people’s health, depending on whether they are rich or poor. As Mayor, I am responsible for producing a Health Inequality Strategy to address this problem, and galvanising the public, private and voluntary sector to reduce the gap in healthy life expectancy that shamefully exists. People are living longer with multiple health conditions, so we need the NHS and associated colleagues to work together in a more joined-up way to make sure that people can be looked after in their communities rather than in hospital.

We also need to train and attract more health and care staff to the capital. London has the highest nursing vacancy rates in the country, at 14%, making it difficult for hospitals to run services properly. We have world-leading research centres and a thriving technology sector, which we need to promote both in terms of smart use of new technologies to improve patient care, and internationally to grow the life science sector.

Demand is increasing and people need to be able to access both digital and local NHS community services so that ambulance and A&E staff are not overwhelmed. On mental health we want the NHS to work more closely with councils, schools and others to improve young people’s ability to access earlier the mental health support they require. We are supporting the Thrive London programme, a citywide movement to improve the mental health and wellbeing of all Londoners. On children’s obesity, we have set up a taskforce to tackle this, as it will affect people’s health for decades to come.

London needs to have more decision-making powers on how we spend our NHS-associated funding so we can put Londoners’ needs at the heart of what we do. That is why I signed a devolution agreement, which includes use of NHS assets and estates. Finally, we need a fully-funded health settlement and a long-term capital allocation to ensure we have a well-staffed service operating in fit-for-purpose premises to deliver the first-class health and care services that Londoners deserve.

Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you. You mention a whole range of activities and priorities there. I want to talk a little bit about social care in London, which, as you will be aware, is struggling to cope with demand and meet the needs of Londoners who most need help. A recent survey by the Local Government Association (LGA) showed that nine in ten councils say that national taxation has to be part of the solution to securing the long-term financial stability of adult social care. Will you commit to working with London boroughs to ensure that social care is better funded and fit to give Londoners the care they need?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Absolutely. London councils do a tremendous job under terrible circumstances in relation to funding. To give you an idea of the scale of the challenge, the LGA, which you referred to, estimate that councils face a £1 billion funding gap in relation to social care by 2020. £1 billion. You will be aware that councils have faced huge cuts over the last eight years. Unless we are not careful, all

Page 40 that the councils will have funds to fund are statutory services. We have talked about youth services, we have talked about rough sleeping. If we are not careful, because of the need in other social care, that is all they will be able to do.

That is why the Government has to step in. The phrase used by the Chairman of the LGA - and by the way he is a Conservative - was ‘window dressing’. When Government says it is going to have a Department for Health and Social Care, he said it is window-dressing. Why? Because you can rebrand and change a name, but unless there are resources and equipment, you are not addressing the issue. That is why it is important we in City Hall support councils who are facing a terrible, terrible time, but actually the worst time is felt by those who need adult social care and their families who are struggling. You will be aware of the knock-on consequence to NHS and hospitals in relation to people who should be in homes receiving social care, who are in hospitals.

Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you. You mentioned devolution and additional powers under devolution. Are you confident that you will get all the powers that you would like to see devolved to yourself and City Hall to make sure we get the best health service in London possible?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, I am not confident at all. By the way, this is a good example where we are not asking for devolution to City Hall, to me, but to London, to the councils. What needs to happen is resources and responsibilities. What has happened in the past is responsibilities, not resources. Councils get blamed in relation to social care without the resources and so we need a combination of both. Devolution of powers and devolution of resources as well. The devolution we have with the Department of Health in the recent past is a good first step. There has to be an acceleration of more devolution.

Fiona Twycross AM: Will you get the level of devolution, do you think, that Greater Manchester has?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We hope so. Greater Manchester, on paper, appears to have a lot more devolution around health and social care. We will have to wait and see how it pans out in real terms, whether they have the resources as well. Our population is far bigger than most, so there are acute challenges and a greater need for devolution. I believe, though, in an NHS. What I do not want is a fragmentation of the NHS. What I do think, though, is we in London - same as those in Manchester - who are at the coalface are better placed to decide how resources are spent, how people are moved, rather than civil service in Whitehall. Also, we want more joined-up-ness between health and social care, and devolution allows us to do that.

Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): The next question is from Assembly Member Boff and relates to Pride parade.

2018/1979 - Pride Parade (2) Andrew Boff AM

Why was Peter Tatchell not invited to your Pride reception?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. I was proud to reinstate the City Hall Pride reception last year, after the previous Mayor shelved it. Our capital stands as a shining light of diversity to the world and it is important to me that the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender plus (LGBT+) community always feels that they have a home in London, and City Hall is the home of London Government. It is important to me to celebrate the capital’s LGBT+ community and I am happy to say it was a hugely successful event this year

Page 41 and last year. I am determined that the newly restored reception at City Hall will be an important yet enjoyable addition to Pride Week celebrations.

I do not personally control the guest list for the event so I cannot give you specifics on who and why people were invited. I understand that 492 people were invited to the reception and this year City Hall has tried to broaden its engagement with the LGBT+ community. For example, City Hall invited the board of UK Black Pride following the work we have been doing, not previously done by City Hall, to support this important event.

Andrew Boff AM: Mr Mayor, it is unusual that Peter Tatchell was not invited, bearing in mind he is a patron of the Pride Trust. Would his lack of an invitation have anything to do with the fact that at the previous Pride reception he challenged you over why you had imposed a 26,000 limit on the numbers who could march in Pride, and this year that meant that 20,000 people were unable to march at Pride? Could it be that he challenged you and therefore was cut out of any future receptions?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am sure it was not. As I said, those who were sorting out the invitation list, I am sure that was not the reason. I am not sure what the reason was, what the criteria is. What I do know is Peter Tatchell is a formidable campaigner who is --

Andrew Boff AM: Did you, Mr Mayor, have notice of this question?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I saw it.

Andrew Boff AM: What inquiries did you make with your team to inquire why he was not invited?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I asked how the invitation list was done and I was told it is done by City Hall staff and they try to broaden those who are invited.

Andrew Boff AM: What is the answer to the question? Why was Peter Tatchell not invited?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am not in charge of the invitation list. What I can tell you --

Andrew Boff AM: You are, actually, Mr Mayor, because you are the Mayor of bloody London and you are in charge of it. You are in charge of it. Why was Peter Tatchell not invited?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I say, Chairman, that the idea that I or any previous Mayor would be in charge of an invitation list is ludicrous? It shows the reason why --

Andrew Boff AM: Mr Mayor, you were given notice of this question. You would have notice of this question. You could ask your team what the answer was, but you do not seem to have done that. Why is that, Mr Mayor?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We can ask a number of questions about why X was not invited, why Y was not invited and why Z was not invited. There are examples --

Andrew Boff AM: I am not asking about X, Y or Z, I am asking about Peter Tatchell.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There are examples of, I suspect, lots of people in the LGBT+ community who would have liked to have been invited and may not have been. What I can say is I have no problems with

Page 42 Peter Tatchell. He is somebody who I respect hugely. Over the last three or four decades he has been a formidable campaigner, not simply for LGBT+ rights but for others as well. Many of the campaigns that I have been involved in on other issues involved Peter Tatchell’s involvement. He is somebody who is a Londoner we should be proud of. The suggestion that --

Andrew Boff AM: Very good. Will you answer his question, then? Will you answer the question he gave to you at the last Pride reception, that he wants an answer from you as to why Pride was artificially limited and that meant that 20,000 people could not march? Will you at least answer that question to him, not now but in writing to him?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Pride in London is a fantastic event, it is a fantastic celebration of our diversity.

Andrew Boff AM: Super, yes, I know, I was there, I got terrible sunburn. We know about that. Mr Mayor, will you answer his question? Will you write to Peter Tatchell and answer why you limited the numbers on Pride?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, let me answer the question now. I placed no limitations on the numbers of people who celebrate Pride.

Andrew Boff AM: OK, so write to him.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman --

Andrew Boff AM: All I am asking is if he could write. He can say yes or he will.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): The Mayor has answered the question and he has said it was not anything to do with him. If he wants to write a letter to Mr Tatchell, that is a matter for the Mayor.

Andrew Boff AM: That is a matter for the Mayor. Finally, just to finish it off. Mr Mayor, Peter Tatchell asked a question at the Pride reception, and he is cut out and excluded from the next one. [Dame] Margaret Hodge raises the issue of antisemitism with Jeremy Corbyn [MP, Leader of the Labour Party] and she gets disciplinary action taken against her. Freedom of speech seems to be under attack in the Labour Party. How will this intolerance to criticism, Mr Mayor, affect the remainder of your Mayoralty?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, can I suggest this is one of the reasons why he never wins elections?

Andrew Boff AM: Is that your answer, Mr Mayor? These are important issues about public engagement, about antisemitism, and you throw a joke.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): No, Mr Boff, these are important questions but it is not a matter for the Mayor to comment on why an MP is not invited --

Andrew Boff AM: It is his party.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): -- or has not access to her own political party. That cannot possibly be in the Mayor’s remit.

Page 43 Andrew Boff AM: I, of course, subject to your ruling.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, could I suggest that maybe some Assembly Members may benefit from guidance from you about questions that are in order and are not in order before the next MQT?

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Indeed. Mr Mayor, you have shown your competence at dealing at these things without any intervention from me, so I give you enough rope before intervening. The next question also comes from Mr Boff and it relates to overcrowding, and he is out of time.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): The next question is from Assembly Member Cooper and it relates to Car-Free Day.

2018/1879 - Car Free Day Leonie Cooper AM

Can the Mayor outline what steps he is taking to implement car-free days in London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. The central aim of my Transport Strategy is for 80% of all trips to be made on foot, by cycle or using public transport by 2041. TfL is implementing my vision for London streets with £2.2 billion allocated to a Healthy Streets portfolio to create greener, safer and more welcoming streets that enable Londoners to walk, cycle and use public transport. Together with major improvements to the public transport network, it will support London’s growth, reduce reliance on cars and help clean up London’s dangerously polluted air.

Car-free events are great opportunities to inspire change by letting people experience the city from a different perspective. We know closures can result in local improvements in air quality. Although TfL is only responsible for 5% of the roads in London, it works throughout the year to support car-free events. This year we are supporting over 100 planned street closures, ranging from high-profile events such as Pride and New Year’s Eve fireworks, to local and cultural events like the Vaisakhi processions and the Ealing Half Marathon. RideLondon this year will see over 70,000 participants cycle the car-free streets of London. TfL’s research following this event in previous years proves over half of these people continued cycling more all year round.

22 September [2018] is World Car-Free Day. Last year TfL marked World Car-Free Day by working with over 100 schools in 18 boroughs and encouraging parents and carers to substitute car journeys to school with walking or cycling. Schools set up car-free zones near their school gates, park-and-stride spots, and walking buses. These activities have continued in 2018. This year we are offering support to boroughs that are organising local car-free events, and TfL is working with the charity London Play to record existing Play Street events, which will involve local road closures, as a series of events to coincide with car-free day. TfL is also working with world car-free organisers to co-ordinate markets and activities and social media. I encourage boroughs to work with TfL and London Play and make this day a huge success and I have asked TfL to consider how they going to do even more to support this in 2019.

Leonie Cooper AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. You have mentioned previously how it manifested itself with a number of schools and a number of boroughs. Are we going to be able to get all the boroughs on board for 22 September this year? Obviously, as you say, with TfL only controlling such a small percentage of the roads, I think it would be really fantastic if we could have a pledge from all of the boroughs. Organisations

Page 44 like Living Streets and London and local cycling campaigns all say this is going to be a real focus on the same day. Is that possible?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have to make sure the major arterial roads are running and working properly, but good councils should be looking at what streets they can have car-free for the day, residential streets. Particularly at schools, in and around schools, it is really important to think about having them car-free. The great thing is parents will realise you can survive without dropping off a child to school, if you are using a car to school, and walking or cycling or getting a scooter from home to school. Also, people will realise the difference it can make, so I would encourage all the boroughs, the local London councils and 32 boroughs to think about on 22 September what they can do to make their communities car-free.

Leonie Cooper AM: Yes. I think we know that when we had the marathon this year, the level of nitrogen oxide (NOx) in the air absolutely plummeted, and the same with other occasions when we have held road closures. There is a real possibility of having a legacy in terms of cleaner air if we can get all boroughs to sign up to this at the same time.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are absolute right. The amount of particulate matter and NOx and nitrogen dioxide is obviously less when there is less usage of cars, particularly as a lot of cars are quite polluting. We have examples in our marathon, the Prudential Bike Ride and other example across London, like Lumiere, where there were fewer NOx and emissions because of less use of cars. I would encourage all boroughs to work with this. Also, people power: parents, carers, teachers, should be lobbing their boroughs to think about doing events around 22 September and also that week. They could do lots and lots of things.

Leonie Cooper AM: I hope that is something that other Assembly Members will be taking back to their boroughs across London to encourage schools and the boroughs to get involved. Is that something that TfL has been able to discuss with London councils and the Transport and Environment Committee to try to encourage them to come on board for this?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have. The chair of that committee, [Councillor] Julian Bell [Leader] of Ealing, is a passionate cycler, as you know, and he will be emphasising the importance of addressing this issue. Heidi [Alexander, Deputy Mayor for Transport] has already met with Julian Bell and the team there. We will carry on talking to London councils. By the way, it is not party-political. There are some very good examples from Conservative councils, Labour councils, Liberal Democrat councils. It is not just inner/outer. All councils have a role to play and can really make this day a special day.

Leonie Cooper AM: There is one issue we do need to take into consideration, which has been raised with me when we have had things like the Prudential Bike Ride. That is people who have access needs and Blue Badge holders. How can we make sure that they are able to still continue their lives when they have some different requirements because of their particular physical needs?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): This is a good example of why we would encourage -- residents must not just put up bollards and close the road off, because there is often a very important reason why the road needs to be entered. It has to be done in co-operation and partnership and with councils. Some of the things we are doing is making sure, when it comes to busy areas, the bus routes that are diverted, there is better communication with residents. We have to make sure those with accessibility issues can access streets. We have to make sure we take on board those who need to use their cars for essential reasons are able to get about when there are car-free days.

Page 45 Leonie Cooper AM: Finally, Mr Mayor, do you think there are any lessons that we can learn from what Anne Hidalgo [Mayor of Paris] has been managing to do in Paris that might be worth drawing to the attention of Westminster Council in relation to Oxford Street?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think the amount of roads that Anne closed off in Paris is quite small but had a huge impact. It shows the difference strong, bold leadership can make. A good example of a leader doing right by their community. Compare and contrast with Westminster. They are not simply letting down residents and businesses in London but I worry the UK economy could suffer because of the short-sighted stance taken by the council.

Leonie Cooper AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. It is a difficult area and I appreciate that you have been pushing forward on this because we really do need to clean up London’s air and we need to take these positive chances to make road closures and car-free days something that we can celebrate. Thank you.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. Assembly Member Berry will ask about police raids and the Notting Hill Carnival.

2018/1747 - Police raids and the Notting Hill Carnival Sian Berry AM

In addition to Notting Hill Carnival, when and for what other public order events have the Metropolitan Police conducted pre-event raids?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman, and thank you for your question. The MPS runs complex operations informed by intelligence to keep the public safe every single day. This includes proactively ahead of large events to minimise the risk for all attendees. For obvious reasons I am not able to provide detail on the exact nature of these operations. Pre-event crime and arrest activity is a legitimate and viable tactic utilised by the MPS in order to meet its priorities of preventing and detecting crime, protecting life and property and maintaining the peace.

I am happy to refer to events already in the public domain. The 2011 Royal Wedding and the 2013 G8 conference are examples of where the MPS has undertaken pre-event crime and arrest activity. On Notting Hill Carnival specifically, the ambition is to make sure events take place successfully and safely. Carnival is one of the most important events on our cultural calendar and it is a fantastic celebration of the capital’s diversity and vibrant history. Last year’s Carnival, thanks to the hard work of our strategic partners, was safer than previous years and we must continue to work together to maintain this direction of travel.

Carnival is a truly unique event. The police are working incredibly hard to further reduce risk and increase safety and security at this year’s event. I regularly discuss Carnival with the MPS and on Tuesday [17 July 2018] I met with the Commissioner who provided me with an update on operational planning for Carnival. As you will appreciate, given recent increases in serious violent crime and the continuing threat of terrorism, the landscape of planning for Carnival this year will be slightly different to previous years. The new Violent Crime Taskforce plays a pivotal role in operational activity to reduce violence across London. The Commissioner has confirmed that operational activity in advance of the event and during the event will be informed by current intelligence and will be proportionate to the risk posed to the safety of the public. We must all send a clear message to the small minority who plan to commit violence that it will simply not be tolerated. For operational reasons I cannot discuss the detail of the MPS’s plan for Carnival today. However, the Gold Commander for Carnival is happy to separately brief the Police and Crime Committee on the plans, as he did last year.

Page 46

Sian Berry AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. First of all, thank you for the strong support that you gave to Carnival there. I think the whole Assembly, the local councils, the Police and Crime Committee, have all fully supported the continuation of Carnival in its current form, without ticketing, moving it or changing the days. I am also pleased to hear that this year the facial recognition technology that was used over the past two years at Carnival will not be used again this year. That is really good.

Last year many members of the public, particularly on social media, including artists like Stormzy, complained that the heavily publicised police raids conducted across London in places such as Catford were being unfairly linked to the Notting Hill Carnival. What do you say to black Londoners, people from groups who take part in Carnival, who say these police activities being labelled as pre-Carnival raids are a slur on their community and their cultural events?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am not going to talk about specific operations. What I can say is nothing could be further from the truth. Last year the Minister for London made representations to move Carnival, and I was quite clear in my mind, those of us who know the history of Carnival. I had the pleasure of meeting, on the day of celebrations here - and the organiser was there as well - the Windrush generation, who talked about the history of Carnival and why we have Carnival. I am quite clear in my mind the importance of Carnival.

It is important, though, if the police have intelligence of somebody about to commit a criminal act or somebody involved in criminality, they have to act on that. If we know there are people - and it is a small minority - determined to use Carnival as an opportunity to commit crime, the police have to act on that. The reality is the vast, vast, vast majority of people who go to Carnival - and we are talking about hundreds of thousands of people - go for good reasons, to celebrate Carnival. There is a small minority who go to commit acts of criminality. That is a fact and we would be criticising the police if they were not acting on that intelligence. The police must act on intelligence but nobody should label an entire community and nobody is.

Sian Berry AM: The worry is about the labelling. The raids may need to be carried out. We have seen the taskforce and they carry out raids daily when operationally needed, but it is the publicity that seems to worry me. These raids are not just carried out, they are heavily publicised and linked to the Carnival. Do you agree this pushes a negative image of Carnival rather than what should be a positive one? It is a great event and it generates tens of millions for London’s economy every year.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I deliberately gave two examples in the public domain where the police have undertaken pre-event raids. The royal wedding. Nobody is suggesting, I am sure, that [His Royal Highness, Prince] William [Duke of Cambridge] or [Her Royal Highness] Kate [Duchess of Cambridge] are criminals, even though there were pre-event raids before their wedding. Certainl,y in 2013 the G8 world leaders, nobody was suggesting they were criminals. Nobody should suggest that the vast, vast, vast, vast majority of those who go to Carnival are criminals, but there is a small, small number, a very small number, who go along to commit acts of criminality, and I support the police taking action against those. What is clear, though, is that nobody should make sweeping generalisations about the entire community.

Sian Berry AM: Yes, or a particular event. I am running out of time but I hope you will encourage the MPS to think about the perception of Carnival when doing press releases. I know you do not get involved in operational matters but with publicity I think you can have an influence on it.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I will, but I can I just say this as well, Chairman, which is really important? Many of us enjoy Carnival, including police officers, but it is a challenging day for the police. I do not apologise for making this point. It is a great day and we all have a great day. The police work incredibly hard.

Page 47 Often it is really hot and they are wearing lots of gear and they have my huge gratitude for making sure Carnival is as safe as it can be.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. Assembly Member Kurten will ask a question on President [Donald] Trump’s visit.

2018/2038 - President Trump’s Visit David Kurten AM

Why did you give permission for an obscene blimp of President Trump to fly over London during the President’s visit to London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. The UK, like the United States (US), has a long and rich history of the right and the freedom to protest and the freedom of speech and the freedom to assemble. I have always supported the right to peaceful protest and understand that this can take many different forms. Parliament Square is a site used for protest on all kinds of issues across the centuries. It is an important assembly point at the heart of our democracy.

The City Operations Team at the GLA, as is usual procedure, met with the organisers of this protest and gave them permission to use Parliament Square Garden as a grounding point for the blimp. The City Operations Team at the GLA have the power to approve use of the gardens as long as a number of criteria are met, such as liability insurance alongside a full health and safety risk assessment by the GLA’s independent consultants. I was not involved in the decision at all. It was made by the City Operations Team at the GLA.

The organisers also had to separately seek the necessary approvals from the MPS and the National Air Traffic Service, which they did. It is important to realise it is not the Mayor’s or the GLA’s role to act as a censor or the arbiter of what is or is not a good protest. It is the GLA’s job to assess whether it can be done safely, legally and peacefully. My main priority is the safety of all Londoners and visitors to our city. As always, I am working closely with the MPS and other key agencies to ensure all protests are carried out safely and securely.

David Kurten AM: Mr Mayor, you seem to be trying to rebrand yourself as a champion of free speech, but in the two years that you have been Mayor, you have introduced new guidelines in TfL advertising that will ban an advertisement like that at Protein World, which simply has on it a picture of a woman in a bikini. You have introduced guidelines to TfL staff to ban them from using the highly offensive phrase “ladies and gentlemen”. You have also introduced new guidance to TfL staff to stop them from commemorating historical British events like the Battle of Rorke’s Drift, which of course was immortalised by Michael Caine in the film Zulu. When I asked you about that in May [2018], you said that the staff at Dollis Hill were ill-judged simply to say “on this day in history the Battle of Rorke’s Drift happened”. Therefore, the idea that you are against censorship is brazenly ridiculous, is it not, Mr Mayor?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Do you want me to deal with each of those points in turn? I am surprised you do not realise this, but freedom to protest and freedom of speech is a bit different from advertising on the Underground. Even the right to free protest has limitations. For example, if there are concerns around national security, your right to free speech can be limited. If, for example, there are issues around ‘child pornography’ - in inverted commas - your limitations are there for free speech. For example, if the laws of defamation are breached, there are limitations on free speech. I am really happy to give you tutelage on free speech.

Page 48 David Kurten AM: I do not think I need any tutelage from you, Mr Mayor.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You asked the question. Article 10 of the Human Rights Act is quite clear about the limitations on free speech. In the US Convention, which you claim to know, the first article talks about the importance of free speech and why it is so important. I am surprised, as somebody who claims to be an expert on free speech, you are not aware in certain circumstances it is right and proper, in a democracy, we have curtailment. For example, you could not go into a busy cinema and shout the word “fire”. That is a limitation on your free speech because of what it would lead to. It would lead to mass panic and all sorts of issues. That is why it is really important, and if it is the case that --

David Kurten AM: Mr Mayor, you are very good at dodging the question that I put to you beforehand, which is about what happened on TfL. Will you allow TfL staff to use the phrase “ladies and gentlemen” in future?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): What is really important is to understand the context of the protest in Parliament Square and why there was the protest in Parliament Square. It seems to me that you are conflating a number of different issues. The right to protest, which I think 250,000 expressed on Friday, and the limitations you want to bring upon them because of hurt feelings to somebody you idolise -- I do not mind you idolising him. What is important, though, is to realise that we must ensure that British citizens and others can express their right to protest.

David Kurten AM: Mr Mayor, you use the word “idolise”. Certainly, that is a childish word, Mr Mayor.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): What word would you use?

David Kurten AM: Obviously President Trump is on course to be one of the greatest presidents. He has successfully done a -- as you will admit, Mr Mayor --

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): You are taking up time.

David Kurten AM: He has successful improved relations with North Korea in a way that no other president or head of state could ever imagine. This blimp that you have allowed to fly in London is the most grotesque insult to a sitting President of the US in history. It would be inconceivable that a mayor of an American city such as New York or Washington would allow such a balloon or blimp to fly over our head of state. If that happened, we would rightly say that this is an insult not just to the head of state but the whole country. Will you admit, Mr Mayor, that this is a gross insult to the President of the US and it brings shame and embarrassment upon our city?

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Time is up. We will never know what the Mayor thinks about that.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, I think you can guess.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): I could guess. The next question is from Assembly Member McCartney and relates to toilet charging.

2018/1819 - Toilet Charging at Transport for London Stations Joanne McCartney AM

Page 49 Currently Transport for London (TfL) charges 20p for the use of toilet facilities at 15 tube stations, all others being free of charge. Network Rail has announced that they plan to scrap all toilet charges at all of its national rail toilets from 2019, stating that it is “quite wrong to penalise people when they are in discomfort”. Will you ensure that TfL abolishes these charges?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That was a very smart segue, Chairman. Public toilets are a vital facility both for Londoners and visitors to the city. They are especially important for those with disabilities, older people, people with babies and young children, pregnant women as well as tourists and visitors who may be less familiar with their surroundings. In my draft new London Plan we have put in place steps to ensure more free public toilets are made available to Londoners across the capital. As part of this, I will be working closely with TfL to see what more can be done to provide clean, safe and accessible toilets on the transport network.

You are correct that while most public toilets across the TfL network are free, there are some locations where there is a small charge per use. Generally, this is at locations where the toilet is located on the unpaid side of the ticket gates and are available for anyone to use. The small charge was originally brought in as a deterrent to antisocial behaviour and to contribute towards repairs and maintenance, as damage to facilities can put toilets out of use for extended periods while costly repairs take place.

TfL wants to be able to provide clean, safe and accessible toilets on the transport network. That is why TfL is reviewing charging as part of an overall review of toilet facilities. The review is looking at other ways to prevent a small minority of people from damaging toilets and will draw upon Network Rail’s experience. Adequate and cost-effective deterrents for antisocial behaviour need to be identified. I know the team at TfL undertaking the review would welcome any input from the Assembly.

Joanne McCartney AM: Thank you. I am very glad that TfL is undertaking a review. Two of those toilets are within my constituency, Enfield and Haringey, at Cockfosters and Oakwood; these 15 toilets, the majority of them are within the curtilage of the station. Can I gather from what you have said that if those fears that vandalism can be overcome, the principle is that they should be free?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is correct, and also to learn what we can from the Network Rail experience as well.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. The final question is from Assembly Member Copley and relates to the Garden Bridge Trust.

2018/1918 - Garden Bridge Trust Tom Copley AM

What discussions has the Mayor had with the Garden Bridge Trust about how it spent the considerable amount of public money it received from Transport for London?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): When I was elected Mayor, roughly £37 million of public money had been given to the Garden Bridge Trust under direction by the previous Mayor. I was clear straight away that I was not going to spend more London’s taxpayers’ money on the project. I have stuck to that commitment. No grant payments have been made to the Garden Bridge Trust since May 2016. It has not received any money from TfL since I was elected. Instead what I have done over the last two years is commission a thorough review, respond to the review recommendations by strengthening TfL’s Board and its processes and shine a light on areas in need of more transparency.

Page 50

It is through my intervention that TfL has extracted and published more detail about the money the Garden Bridge Trust has spent on the project, as well as the minutes of the Trust board meetings that show how the project was managed. This additional information helped me to decide in April last year that signing up the GLA to guarantee the lifetime costs of the bridge’s maintenance and operation was a serious financial risk and not one I could take while maintaining my commitment to not spend any more of London’s taxpayers’ money on that project.

The Garden Bridge Trust is now winding up its affairs following its decision to end the project. Last year the Government agreed to provide the Trust with an underwriting of up to £9 million of its potential cancellation costs, despite the Permanent Secretary formally advising against this. This was the Government’s choice. I declined to provide this support. This both allowed the project to continue for longer and increase the final bill for the taxpayer. As administrators of the public sector project funding, TfL has been in discussions with the Garden Bridge Trust about the detail of any claim against the Government’s underwriting, and I have been clear that I expect to see full transparency from the Trust before any final payment should be made.

Tom Copley AM: Thank you for that answer, Mr Mayor, and particularly for the last thing that you said about full transparency, because in August last year the Chair of the Garden Bridge Trust, Lord [Mervyn] Davies, wrote to you and said:

“On the subject of where the money has gone, we will of course account for every line of expenditure as part of the winding-up operation.”

Are you still expecting to get a line-by-line account of the Garden Bridge Trust expenditure?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am. We need to see full transparency. You will remember that the Government has asked us to deal with the Garden Bridge Trust in relation to the final part of the monies and we will make sure we get full transparency.

Tom Copley AM: Sorry, the Government has asked you to --

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The Government has asked us to be the person who negotiates and deals with the Garden Bridge Trust in relation to the money it holds, the additional money that they agreed upon. We are quite clear we want to see transparency from the Garden Bridge Trust before these monies are handed over.

Tom Copley AM: Does that mean once you have those details they will be published and the public will also be able to see them?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): They should be, yes. I cannot see a good reason that they would not be.

Tom Copley AM: Excellent. Are you aware at this stage if there is any hope of TfL and the taxpayer getting back any of the money that has been wasted on this project?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, the bad news is that monies authorised under direction by the previous Mayor have been spent. There is no chance we can get the money back; it has been spent. Obviously if Parliament wants to look into these issues - but so far Parliament has not - we would assist them in relation to any inquiry they want to have on this.

Page 51 Tom Copley AM: Do you think that Parliament should be looking into these issues, given the level of loss of money to the taxpayer?

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You will be aware previously City Hall has done a lot of work in relation to the work the Committee has done, the work that TfL has done, the review undertaken by [Dame] Margaret Hodge. You will be aware central Government authorised a considerable amount of money, as recently as last year, against the advice of the Permanent Secretary. If the Public Accounts Committee or the NAO was to look into this, we would provide all the assistance that they wanted.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr Mayor. That is the end of question time. I hope you have a peaceful break.

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman.

Page 52

Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time on 19 July 2018

Serious Youth Violence - Parents'/Carers' Advice Question No: 2018/1820 Joanne McCartney Parents/Carers often don't know where to go for advice when their child is at risk or involved in criminal activity. How are you ensuring that they have easy access to advice and guidance, and how are you ensuring that their experiences are taken into account in your youth violence prevention work?

Oral response

Commons vote on Heathrow third runway Question No: 2018/1746 Caroline Russell What actions will you take to stop the third runway at Heathrow?

Oral response

Police Clear Up Rates Question No: 2018/2037 Peter Whittle I am sure the Mayor will join me in congratulating the Durham Police Force on becoming the best police force in the country, when it comes to solving crime. They solve 18% of all crimes in the university city, while similar-sized police forces manage a score of just 5%. Mike Barton, Durham's chief constable attributed the force's success to good old-fashioned policing.1 What lessons do you think might the Metropolitan Police learn from the policing model operated by the Durham Force?

1 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sunday-times-crime-map-beat-bobbies-dazzle-in- durham-7jtx2dr8k

Oral response

Congestion Charge for PHVs Question No: 2018/1990 Gareth Bacon Is charging private hire vehicles to drive into the Congestion Charge Zone a fair and proportionate measure?

Oral response

Page 53 President Trump's visit to London Question No: 2018/1902 Andrew Dismore How much did the policing of President Trump's visit to London cost; and how many dedicated ward officers were taken off their wards to police the visit?

Oral response

London's Bus Mileage Question No: 2018/1965 Keith Prince What percentage reduction in London's total bus mileage has there been under your mayoralty?

Oral response

Public engagement Question No: 2018/1994 Steve O'Connell What are you doing to encourage residents of London to engage with the police?

Oral response

Oxford Street pedestrianisation Question No: 2018/1698 Caroline Pidgeon What is your plan B for Oxford Street?

Oral response

Brexit and Security Question No: 2018/1919 Unmesh Desai How are you and the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime working with the Met to prepare for the possibility of losing access to security arrangements such as the European Arrest Warrant and Europol after the UK leaves the European Union?

Oral response

Page 54 Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation Question No: 2018/1993 Shaun Bailey Do you agree that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation represents a fantastic opportunity to build thousands of homes for London?

Oral response

EU Workers Question No: 2018/1844 Fiona Twycross The Office for National Statistics has found that there has been a 43 per cent drop of the number of EU citizens coming to work in the UK since the referendum. What is the impact of this in London?

Oral response

Uber Question No: 2018/1807 Florence Eshalomi Please update me on the current situation surrounding Uber and their Private Hire Operators Licence?

Oral response

Culture for All Londoners Question No: 2018/1829 Navin Shah Outer London is struggling to maintain and enhance the culture and creative industries due to austerity measures. How will your strategic vision for London's culture provide better access to those living in outer London, particularly young people?

Oral response

ULEZ Question No: 2018/1991 Gareth Bacon Are you satisfied that the impact of the expanded ULEZ has been fully assessed?

Oral question receiving a written response The Mayor Please see my answer to Mayor's Question 2018/1350 and the letter I sent to you in response to the issues raised.

Page 55 Homelessness Question No: 2018/1912 Tom Copley I welcome your announcement of an extra £3.3 million to tackle rough sleeping in London. However, how far will this go towards providing a long term, sustainable route off the streets for all rough sleepers without support from the Government?

Oral response

NHS@70 Parliamentary Awards Question No: 2018/1848 Fiona Twycross Will the Mayor join me in congratulating the nominees, from across London, for the NHS70 Parliamentary Awards? What challenges do you see for the NHS over the next 70 years and how can we make sure that we are united to have the best health service in London?

Oral response

Pride Parade (2) Question No: 2018/1979 Andrew Boff Why was Peter Tatchell not invited to your Pride reception?

Oral response

Page 56 Overcrowding Question No: 2018/1982 Andrew Boff Will you be monitoring progress in tackling overcrowding in London?

Oral question receiving a written response The Mayor My Housing Strategy includes for the first time a section dedicated to overcrowding, setting out the evidence around it and the range of actions we are taking. This includes a new policy in my draft London Plan that for the first time requires boroughs to set out the size mix of low- cost rent homes they want to see in their area. This is intended to make sure new social housing is targeted toward tackling overcrowding, by taking into account local evidence such as waiting lists.

Through this policy, boroughs can require more family-sized social housing. It also means they can require smaller homes for potential downsizers, whose moving will free up existing larger homes, and for 'concealed households' of people sharing with others because they can't afford a home of their own.

We will be able to monitor the impact of my size mix policies through the Annual Monitoring Report for my London Plan. This sets out the number of homes of each size and tenure built in London each year.

I have also published, for the first time, an implementation plan for my Housing Strategy that will monitor 11 key indicators - one of which is the overall rate of overcrowding in London - that have been chosen to assess the impact of my strategy over time. These indicators will be reported on an annual basis in my 'Housing in London' report.

We need the powers and resources to build more social housing, and it is also crucial Government take other steps, such as reversing welfare cuts which are leaving some tenants with no choice but to stay in overcrowded accommodation because they can't afford to move out into somewhere of the right size.

Car Free Day Question No: 2018/1879 Leonie Cooper Can the Mayor outline what steps he is taking to implement car-free days in London?

Oral response

Police raids and the Notting Hill Carnival Question No: 2018/1747 Sian Berry In addition to Notting Hill Carnival, when and for what other public order events have the Metropolitan Police conducted pre-event raids?

Oral response

Page 57 President Trump's Visit Question No: 2018/2038 David Kurten Why did you give permission for an obscene blimp of President Trump to fly over London during the President's visit to London?

Oral response

Toilet Charging at Transport for London Stations Question No: 2018/1819 Joanne McCartney Currently Transport for London (TfL) charges 20p for the use of toilet facilities at 15 tube stations, all others being free of charge. Network Rail has announced that they plan to scrap all toilet charges at all of its national rail toilets from 2019, stating that it is "quite wrong to penalise people when they are in discomfort". Will you ensure that TfL abolishes these charges?

Oral response

Garden Bridge Trust Question No: 2018/1918 Tom Copley What discussions has the Mayor had with the Garden Bridge Trust about how it spent the considerable amount of public money it received from Transport for London?

Oral response

Non-disclosure agreements (1) Question No: 2018/1699 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how many non-disclosure agreements with former staff at Transport for London have been signed as part of the process of their employment being terminated in the years 2016/17 and 2017/18.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

There were 848 agreements entered into in 2016/17 and 704 agreements in 2017/18. The 2017/18 figure is subject to the outcome of public inspection and TfL Board Approval of TfL's Annual Accounts in July.

Page 58 Non-disclosure agreements (2) Question No: 2018/1700 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how many non-disclosure agreements with former staff at the London Fire Brigade have been signed as part of the process of their employment being terminated in the years 2016/17 and 2017/18.

The Mayor

The number of non-disclosure agreements signed with former staff at London Fire Brigade was as follows:

2016/17 - 1

2017/18 - 3

Non-disclosure agreements (3) Question No: 2018/1701 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how many non-disclosure agreements with former staff at the Metropolitan Police Service have been signed as part of the process of their employment being terminated in the years 2016/17 and 2017/18.

The Mayor

When answering this question, we have interpreted it to mean:

How many employment tribunals (ET) cases in financial years 16/17 and 17/18 have resulted in cases reaching an agreement that has concluded with the Claimant (MPS 'employee') leaving the organisation and signing a legal document to that effect AND how many of these have signed such an agreement that contains a confidentiality clause.

On that basis, within the financial years 16/17 and 17/18, five ET Claimants were released from the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) as part of Settlement Compromise Agreements which included an Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) agreement form (commonly known as a COT3 form).

Of those five Claimants, three were Police Officers and two were Police Staff members. Of the five agreements produced to deal with the settlement conditions four contained confidentiality clauses. One agreement from a Police Staff member did not contain any confidentiality restrictions.

The terms of each Settlement Compromise Agreement, and whether it includes confidentiality restrictions, will depend on all the circumstances of the case.

Page 59 Non-disclosure agreements (4) Question No: 2018/1702 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how many non-disclosure agreements with former staff at the London Legacy Development Corporation have been signed as part of the process of their employment being terminated in the years 2016/17 and 2017/18.

The Mayor

All exit agreements that LLDC enters into with members of staff contain requirements as to the confidentiality of the exit arrangement and the disclosure of confidential information. These requirements do not apply to whistle blowing or where there is a legal obligation to disclose the information. There were three agreements entered into in 2016/17 and one in 2017/18.

Non-disclosure agreements (5) Question No: 2018/1703 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how many non-disclosure agreements with former staff at the Greater London Authority have been signed as part of the process of their employment being terminated in the years 2016/17 and 2017/18.

The Mayor

In the periods requested, the following number of non-disclosure agreements were signed by former staff as part of the process of their employment being terminated

2016/17 6 2017/18 6

Page 60 Taxi Engagement Group Question No: 2018/1704 Caroline Pidgeon What plans does Transport for London have to engage all road users, such as members of the Taxi Engagement Group, in consultations about new designs for junctions and roads in London?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

All consultations run by Transport for London (TfL) are available online for comment at consultations.tfl.gov.uk. These are open to everyone and all feedback is very welcome.

TfL is committed to reaching audiences through a range of communication channels before the start of formal consultation. This includes people directly affected by a proposal, service users and their representatives. Communication often includes public meetings, letter and email notifications, focus groups and stakeholder events.

TfL holds a central consultation stakeholder contact list. The list, which includes a range of stakeholders from emergency services, MPs and boroughs, is refined for every consultation.

Representatives from fifteen taxi and private hire groups receive an email notification inviting them to have their say on every TfL consultation, from proposed changes to road layouts and bus routes to major infrastructure projects.

For consultations about taxis and private hire vehicles TfL also contacts licensed drivers, operators, trade bodies and owners of vehicles.

Page 61 Provision of body worn cameras for Taxi and Private Hire vehicle licence inspectors. Question No: 2018/1705 Caroline Pidgeon Will you consider introducing body worn cameras for Transport for London taxi and Private Hire vehicle licensing inspectors to ensure greater reliability of evidence collected and to reduce vexatious complaints?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) is closely following the developments in Body Worn Video (BWV) technology and its use in policing and compliance roles. TfL is currently examining whether cameras could have a role in supporting its officers in a range of operational roles, including Taxi & Private Hire Compliance Officers.

Grass cutting by Transport for London (1) Question No: 2018/1706 Caroline Pidgeon Please confirm what TfL's policy is for cutting grass verges on the Transport for London Road Network?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) currently has a policy to provide a low (six grass cuts per year), medium (11 grass cuts per year) or high (16 grass cuts per year) regime across the Transport for London Road Network depending on the location, as an example residential area usually receive 11 cuts a year. In some high-speed traffic areas, there may be fewer vegetation or grass cuts due to the difficulty in gaining safe access without causing excessive disruption.

TfL is currently reassessing its road network grass-cutting regime while doing this they will be taking into account resources, safety and the local environment.

Page 62 Grass cutting by Transport for London (2) Question No: 2018/1707 Caroline Pidgeon Since May 2008, how many complaints has Transport for London received per calendar year from (a) councillors, MPs and London Assembly Members, (b) members of the public, relating to reductions in grass cutting along verges on the Transport for London Road Network?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

During 2017, Transport for London (TfL) received: a) Three enquiries from councillors, MPs and London Assembly Members. b) Ten from members of the public.

During 2018 TfL received: a) 20 enquiries from councillors, MPs and London Assembly Members. b) 81 from members of the public.

Before this time grass cutting was not categorised as a separate category of enquiry.

The increase in 2018 is mainly linked to the loss of a key subcontractor in south London resulting in our first summers grass cuts not being completed. The backlog is now being addressed.

Grass cutting by Transport for London (3) Question No: 2018/1708 Caroline Pidgeon Will Transport for London consider publishing its schedule for cutting grass verges on the TLRN?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) is in the process of making changes to its grass cutting schedules across London. It would be happy to share the schedules once they have been finalised.

Page 63 Money left on Oyster cards which have not been used for at least one year (1) Question No: 2018/1709 Caroline Pidgeon Will you ensure Transport for London reduces the 48-hour threshold that exists before anyone can claim back the balance and deposit on an Oyster card?

The Mayor

The 48-hour threshold was introduced as a response to a significant risk of fraud. Transport for London (TfL) has upgraded its fraud prevention measures and recently reduced the threshold to 24 hours.

Any customers for whom it would be inconvenient to wait 24 hours (for example because they are leaving London) can obtain a refund more quickly by contacting the TfL customer team on 0343 222 1234.

Money left on Oyster cards which have not been used for at least one year (2) Question No: 2018/1710 Caroline Pidgeon Since media reports that the level of money left on Oyster cards not used for at least one year stands at over £231 million I have been contacted by a number of people who have indicated they would like to donate their remaining balance and deposit on disused Oyster cards to specific Transport for London (TfL)transport projects, such as cycling projects. Will TfL consider this suggestion?

The Mayor

I very much welcome the sentiment of contributing to further investment in transport. However, developing and maintaining the systems and processes to support the donation of remaining balances would be very complex, and therefore likely to have costs that would exceed the income received. This would result in less money being available for investing in transport projects.

TfL is committed to ensuring its customers can get back the credit on their Oyster cards if that is what they want. This is why we regularly publish the amount of unused credit on cards and information on how people can obtain a refund. Refunds can be obtained from any Tube station, ticket machine, our visitor information centres or by contacting our customer team on 0343 222 1234.

Page 64 Boxing Day service on the London Overground Question No: 2018/1711 Caroline Pidgeon Will you ensure that Transport for London finally provides a Boxing Day service on the London Overground this year?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) has been discussing the possibility of running Boxing Day services on London Overground with Network Rail and Arriva Rail London (ARL) as any decision cannot be made by TfL in isolation. It requires consideration of planned engineering work and likely demand. At this stage, no final decisions have been made.

Barking to Gospel Oak Overground service (1) Question No: 2018/1712 Caroline Pidgeon When does the lease that Arriva Rail London holds on eight Class172 diesel multiple units (172001 - 172008) owned by Angel Trains leasing expire?

The Mayor

Please see my answer to Mayor's Question 2018/1713.

Barking to Gospel Oak Overground service (2) Question No: 2018/1713 Caroline Pidgeon What contingency planning has Transport for London carried out to ensure that the eight Class172 diesel multiple units (172001 - 72008) will not be transferred to West Midlands Railway before eight New Class710 electric multiple units have entered service on the Barking to Gospel Oak Overground service?

The Mayor

A sublease arrangement for Class172 trains has been agreed until December 2018.

The Class710's manufacturer has assured Transport for London the new trains will be available for service by November.

Page 65 Central Line train service Question No: 2018/1714 Caroline Pidgeon Please set out when current investment plans will deliver improvements in the frequency of service of trains on the London Underground between West Ruislip and White City.

The Mayor

There are currently no plans to increase the frequency of trains between West Ruislip and White City. However, Transport for London's (TfL) passenger modelling shows that when Elizabeth line services start running from Ealing Broadway through Central London, 5,000 fewer passengers will use the Central line in the morning peak from the West. This means that there will be more space on the Central line for passengers travelling at the busiest times of the day.

There are other significant improvements to the Central line that will improve the quality and reliability of services. TfL is investing £356 million as part of the Central Line Improvement Programme that includes the replacement of old traction motors on the fleet, to help reduce delays on the line. The programme also includes accessibility enhancements for passengers, including more space for wheelchair users, audio and visual passenger information, and colour- contrasting features. These improvements will be complete by 2024. In the longer term, TfL will replace the current 92' Stock train fleet with the next generation of trains as part of the Deep Tube Upgrade Programme.

TfL will of course continue to seek opportunities to maximise the frequency of services within the capability of the current fleet size.

Blocking of pedestrian crossings by vehicles Question No: 2018/1715 Caroline Pidgeon A constituent has contacted me to ask whether Transport for London will consider extending the yellow box system used to keep free vehicle crossings to pedestrian crossings. They point out that if the traffic is congested, large vehicles such as lorries or buses, frequently stop across pedestrian crossings and block from view the 'green person' crossing sign. This means that pedestrians can neither safely cross when they are entitled to, nor, see when the symbol has changed from red to green.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 66 Monitoring of CO2 on the London Underground Question No: 2018/1716 Caroline Pidgeon Please set out the reasons why Transport for London does not routinely monitor levels of CO2 that can build up on London Underground trains?

The Mayor

It is essential that staff and passengers on Transport for London (TfL) services breathe the cleanest air possible.

TfL has taken measurements of the levels of CO2 on the network, most recently in winter 2017/18 as part of its work to evaluate the effect of ventilation systems. TfL took measurements inside passenger carriages on the Victoria line during rush hour periods. Given the high level of passenger usage and the fact that the Victoria Line is fully enclosed, this scenario is one in which the highest CO2 readings are likely to be encountered on the network.

The measurements have consistently shown that levels that accumulate in London Underground are far below the regulatory limits. For this reason, CO2 is not routinely monitored.

Crossrail HGV Safety Policy after February 2015 Question No: 2018/1717 Caroline Pidgeon In your response to Question 2018/3011 you stated: "there have been no further fatal incidents involving HGVs working on the Crossrail project since Mayor's Question 2016/0383 was asked in February 2016." Since Mayor's Question 2016/0383 showed the last fatality involving a Crossrail HGV was in February 2015, can you identify any working practices or policies put in place by Crossrail since that date which might have produced this better safety performance? Are there any lessons to be learnt that can be applied to other construction projects and, if so, will you ensure Crossrail publicise them?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Crossrail and its Tier 1 contractors have provided strong leadership on road safety management and set a new benchmark for the industry. Crossrail was one of the first projects to introduce mandatory requirements for additional HGV safety equipment and driver training. HGVs serving the project must be fitted with over 20 safety items and follow approved routes, and over 10,000 drivers involved in Crossrail have completed safety training.

In 2014, measures were tightened further. Drivers whose vehicles fail safety checks are suspended from the project; the driver, and a senior manager from their company, then have to re-take the safety course before they are allowed to resume deliveries to Crossrail sites. Crossrail also contributed to the development of the 'van smart' driver training, which was

Page 67 rolled out by Transport for London (TfL) in early 2016 and set a new standard for drivers of vehicles of up to 3.5 tonnes. No further significant changes have been made to the measures from February 2015 as Crossrail felt the scheme was well embedded and there was a strong compliance culture.

Three papers containing information about the Crossrail HGV safety programme and the lessons that have been learnt have been published on the Crossrail Learning Legacy website. These have been made available to all relevant organisations and the project's road safety management regime has been highlighted at around 50 events with industry partners as part of the Learning Legacy project. They are available at https://learninglegacy.crossrail.co.uk

The Construction Logistics for Cycle Safety, the industry-recognised common standard for fleet safety, was also founded largely on the best practice implemented by Crossrail.

Safety Performance Measures in FirstGroup Tram Operations Limited's Croydon Tram Contract Question No: 2018/1718 Caroline Pidgeon In your response to my Question 2017/3872 you stated: "there is currently no need to amend" Tram Operations Limited's 30-year contract with Transport for London to include safety provisions. Given the nine substantive safety issues revealed in Fatigue Audit IA 17 780 and your stated Vision Zero policy, have you now changed your initial position on this matter?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) closely monitors the safety performance of all its contracted services, including those provided by Tram Operations Limited (TOL), to ensure that relevant industry safety standards are being met and that corrective actions are being implemented to address any identified shortcomings.

In addition to undertaking audits, such as that into TOL's fatigue management arrangements, TfL collects and monitors a considerable number of safety key performance indicators from TOL on a four-weekly basis. This is to ensure that underlying safety trends are identified and managed appropriately, as well as to highlight individual issues or incidents which may require specific or more urgent attention.

TfL continually reviews and adjusts the safety indicators that are included in this monitoring system. After the audit into TOL's fatigue management arrangements was concluded, TfL subsequently added a number of specific indicators of fatigue management performance. These continue to be monitored periodically.

This safety monitoring arrangement is not an explicit contractual requirement between TfL and TOL, but nevertheless is a key feature of both organisations' safety management systems, which are required to be adopted and verified to the safety regulator, Office of Rail and Road, under the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006.

Page 68 "Administrative Error" and Fatigue Audit Report IA 17 780 (1) Question No: 2018/1719 Caroline Pidgeon In your response to my Question 2018/1312 you stated: "TfL has strengthened its procedures to ensure more robust checks are undertaken on whether any internal reports could be of interest to external investigating bodies." Please provide me with a copy of the official communication which confirms how these procedures have been "strengthened" so an "administrative error" which you report to have occurred with IA 17 780 will not occur again.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) has amended its management system document "Reporting and investigating incidents" to include the following text:

"Investigations led by regulatory bodies

Everyone must co-operate with investigations carried out by health, safety or environmental regulatory bodies; responding promptly to requests for information.

Regulatory and enforcement bodies include:

The Environment Agency

The Health and Safety Executive Local Authority

The London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority

The Metropolitan and British Transport Police

In addition, for Rail and Underground only:

Office of Rail Regulation (Railway Inspectorate)

Rail Accident Investigation Branch

In addition, for Surface Transport only:

Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA)

Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB)

Port of London Authority (PLA)

Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA)

A nominated point of contact will be identified to coordinate the interface with the regulator/enforcement body during their investigation.

In addition to responding to requests for specific information, the HSE Directorate will identify and provide information held by TfL that mayPage have 69 a material bearing on the investigation. This may include, but is not limited to the findings of previous investigations or audits.

The TfL Director of Health, Safety and Environment, or their nominee shall review investigation Data Sets used to produce graphic information on Page 10 of "Improving Cyclist Safety in London" Report Question No: 2018/1720 Caroline Pidgeon Page 10 of a Transport for London (TfL)report entitled "Improving Cyclist Safety in London" presented to the Safety Sustainability and Human Resources Panel on 20 June 2018 shows that buses and coaches are the most disproportionally involved in Killed or Seriously Injured incidents with cyclists. Can you provide me with the complete underlying data sets used by TfL to produce all the graphic information shown on that slide?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The table below provides the underlying data used to estimate the ratio of motorised vehicle involvement in collisions resulting in a cyclist being killed or seriously injured (KSI) between 2014 and 2016. Figures for the number of cyclist KSIs are sourced from STATS19 collision data (https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/road-safety) and the number vehicle kilometres travelled in London from DfT traffic counts (https://www.dft.gov.uk/traffic- counts/).

Ratio of vehicle involvement in collisions resulting in death or seriously injury: for people cycling (2014-2016)

Improving Pedestrian Safety in London Question No: 2018/1721 Caroline Pidgeon Will you consider producing a report on "Improving Pedestrian Safety in London" using the same data-rich presentations that Transport for London provided in its recent "Improving Cyclist Safety in London" as presented to the Safety Sustainability and Human Resources Panel on 20 June 2018?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

On 20 June 2018, at the request of the Safety, Sustainability and Human Resources Panel, Transport for London (TfL) provided an update on its recent and planned work relating to cycle safety.

TfL also has in depth data and a comprehensive programme relating to activity to improve pedestrian safety. TfL plans to provide the Safety, Sustainability and Human Resources Panel with a similar update in the coming months on pedestrian safety.

Page 70 Absence of Bus Safety Incident Time-Series Data in Quarterly Health and Safety Report presented to Transport for London SSHR Panel on 20 June 2018 Question No: 2018/1722 Caroline Pidgeon This quarter's health and safety report submitted to Transport for London's Safety Sustainability and Human Resources Panel on 20 June 2018 contained no bus safety data. Does Transport for London have any plans to re-issue the quarterly Health and Safety Executive report with this data included?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The Quarterly Report contains bus safety incident data from 2014/15 - 2017/18 at page 19 (collisions) and at page 25 (customer injuries and falls on buses).

Additional graphs showing incident trends were also handed out at Transport for London's Safety Sustainability and Human Resources Panel (SSHR) Panel and are now available on the TfL website: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/sshrp-20180620-part-1-item-09-appendix-q4-stats.pdf

Fatigue Audits of First Group Tram Operations Limited's Tram Drivers Question No: 2018/1723 Caroline Pidgeon Your response to Question 2018/1315 confirmed that only two such audits have taken place since Transport for London (TfL)acquired the Croydon Tram Operation from its Private Finance Initiative Partners in 2008. Why did TfL conduct so few audits of the fitness and competence of Tram Operations Limited's Tram drivers? How often does TfL intend to carry out such audits in the future?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London's (TfL's) programme of audits is planned annually using a risk-based approach to ensure assurance activity is appropriately prioritised across TfL's breadth of activities and risks. The external and internal investigations into Sandilands both address this point and provide recommendations to improve management of risk.

TfL's current audit and assurance activity relating to operational fitness is summarised in the response to Mayor's Question 2018/1131, including a further audit in relation to Tram Operations Limited that is scheduled in the 2018/19 audit programme.

Page 71 TfL Bus Garage Safety Question No: 2018/1724 Caroline Pidgeon In previous responses to Question 2014/1817 and Question 2014/1368 about bus garage safety, the previous Mayor of London stated: "TfL is also already exploring revised arrangements with bus operators that would give it greater visibility of RIDDOR [Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrence Regulations] notifications sent to the Health and Safety Executive, which would include incidents with one or two seriously injured people." Will you instruct Transport for London to finally publish detailed data about serious safety incidents at bus garages every quarter on its bus safety data page?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

50 years of Victoria Line between Walthamstow and Highbury and Islington Question No: 2018/1725 Caroline Pidgeon Will you ensure Transport for London supports the 50-year celebrations of the Victoria Line between Walthamstow and Highbury, including the events being organised by the E17 Walthamstow Pumphouse Museum?

The Mayor

Yes. Transport for London (TfL) is rightly proud of its heritage and will be supporting the celebrations.

In September 2018, TfL is planning heritage displays at several of the Victoria line stations celebrating their 50th anniversary and will be offering pre-booked tours of these stations during Open House London.

TfL has had discussions with the Walthamstow Pumphouse Museum and station staff will be briefed on the events being organised there so they can direct people to the Museum.

Page 72 Distraction by taxi and private hire drivers Question No: 2018/1726 Caroline Pidgeon In answer to Question 2018/0629 you stated that following the lack of steps being taken by the Department for Transport to research the issue of the distraction some taxi and private hire drivers might face with the use of Satnavs and Apps while driving that "TfL is now considering other potential avenues to better understand this issue". Please set out what progress Transport for London has made in its consideration of further action.

The Mayor

The issue of drivers and riders being distracted by mobile devices, apps and sat navs is one that affects all road users, including those who drive or ride for a living e.g. delivery drivers, couriers and taxi and private hire drivers.

I have asked Transport for London (TfL) to look into this issue and identify ways in which the level of distraction from these devices could be better understood. Workshops will be held with key stakeholders, from a number of industries, to understand the use of electronic devices whilst driving and explore solutions to the potential distraction these devices pose. Following these workshops, there may be a case for additional research to increase our understanding of the detriment to driver performance and increased collision risk when drivers use mobile / electronic devices.

TfL will continue to engage with the Department for Transport to request that legislation keeps pace with advances in technology and the ability to enforce against unsafe road user behaviour.

Page 73 Renewal of Taxicard contract Question No: 2018/1727 Caroline Pidgeon A number of people with disabilities have concerns with the re-awarding of the Taxicard contract to CityFleet. Will you ensure that the main conditions of the contract in terms of service delivery are made public and also set out where any improvements in service have been specified?

The Mayor

Yes, the main conditions of the new contract, in terms of service delivery, booking and provision of journeys for the Taxicard scheme are the same. They are included in the specification, which will be published by Transport for London (TfL) and London Councils with the contract at the following link: https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/contracts-greater-than-5000

Meetings with key stakeholders are being planned to discuss the new contract and the improvements it will bring for customers.

Individual Taxicard members will also receive detailed information in the autumn about the service improvements as a result of their feedback and the new contract.

Bricklayers Arms station Question No: 2018/1728 Caroline Pidgeon Transport for London (TfL) states it is currently looking at an option for an additional tube station on the Bakerloo Line Extension at the Bricklayers Arms. To help offset the costs of constructing an extra station will you instruct TfL to fully examine the option of a mixed use site at the Bricklayers Arms roundabout such as has been the case at Nine Elms station?

The Mayor

Following the public consultation on possible Bakerloo line extension stations and shafts last year, Transport for London continues to review options for the number and location of stations along the Old Kent Road as part of the proposed scheme. This work is considering a range of factors including the impact of any possible station on the delivery of new homes and jobs, both in the surrounding area and in an oversite development, such as has been the case at Nine Elms station on the Northern line extension.

Page 74 Restorative Justice (1) Question No: 2018/1729 Caroline Pidgeon Under the Victim Code of Practice, victims are entitled to be told about restorative justice. How many victims of crime in 2016/17 and in the first two quarters of 2017/18 were made aware of restorative justice? Please break this down by quarter.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Prior to the Restore:London service, the offer of restorative justice (RJ) to victims was not recorded.

Restore:London is tasked as part of the grant agreement to increase awareness of RJ. This is achieved through multiple means, including direct correspondence with victims of crime, promotional materials and stakeholder communications. It is not therefore possible to measure precisely how many Londoners have been made aware of RJ through all these channels.

However, questions about RJ have been added to the User Satisfaction Survey (USS) and the Public Attitude Survey (PAS) and this may be used as a proxy measure.

In the USS victims of crime are asked whether they were offered information on restorative justice. The proportion of respondents saying 'yes' to this question is 20% in quarter 1 (April to June 2017) and 19% in quarter 2 (July to September 2017). In context, RJ is only offered where there is an identified victim and an identified offender, so is not suitable for all victims of crime.

In the PAS, a representative sample of 3,200 Londoners are asked whether they were aware of restorative justice before participating in the survey. This question is only asked in Quarters 1 and 3. The proportion of respondents saying 'yes' is 20% in quarter 1, and 30% in quarter 3 (October to December 2017).

Page 75 Restorative Justice (2) Question No: 2018/1730 Caroline Pidgeon Since awarding the pan-London restorative justice contract to Restore:London in August 2016, how many victims accessed restorative justice? How many restorative justice cases have been concluded and how many are underway?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The Grant Agreement with Restore:London to deliver a pan-London restorative justice service is a two-phase agreement. The first phase comprised working with MOPAC and stakeholders to develop the pan-London model. Phase 2 of the agreement, the delivery of the service, began on 3 April 2017.

Up to 30 June 2018, 219 victims have accessed Restorative Justice (RJ). There are;

70 live cases

101 pending cases - these are cases that are suitable for an RJ offer but practitioners have been unable as yet to make direct contact with the victims. These victims will have received a letter ahead of the direct contact with information about RJ and alerting them that they will be contacted directly to discuss their options.

335 closed cases - these are cases where the RJ service is concluded or the victim, having been informed of the RJ services available, declined to take up the offer.

The pan-London RJ offer is a completely new service and as such no hard targets were set. However, the outputs delivered meet our expectations at this stage of the grant agreement.

Page 76 Restorative Justice (3) Question No: 2018/1731 Caroline Pidgeon Until when does the current contract with Restore:London run and what are your plans for restorative justice provision in London after that?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The conditional grant agreement for the Restore:London Consortium to provide a pan-London Restorative Justice offer to victims ends in March 2019.

I'm committed to ensuring that a restorative justice option continues to be offered where it can improve outcomes for victims. My Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime will be working with the Victims Commissioner for London, MOPAC officers and stakeholders and victims to ensure that the victims services we commission going forward, including restorative justice, best serve victims' needs.

An evaluation of the current Restore:London service will help inform this work and we'll ensure the Assembly, and the public, are made aware of our future plans when they're in place.

Restorative Justice (4) Question No: 2018/1732 Caroline Pidgeon Will you make sure that information on making victims aware of restorative justice, and how many access it, are routinely published as new data is made available?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

As part of its grant agreement Restore:London actively promotes and raises awareness of restorative justice through the Restorative Justice Network, training for police and volunteers and, not least, by contacting victims directly. I will also direct MOPAC to ensure information is available on the website and City Hall blog.

We have robust reporting mechanisms in place for the victims services we commission and this is used for performance management of services.

Page 77 Merlin ACN reports Question No: 2018/1733 Caroline Pidgeon Is the Metropolitan Police Service actively working with the health and social care sector to encourage GPs and social workers to access and act upon Merlin ACN (Adult Come to Notice) reports?

The Mayor

The Metropolitan Police Service works with partners, including health and social care sector through the multi-agency safeguarding hub (MASH). All Merlin reports are risk rated according to MPS guidance developed from the London continuum of need and the Pan- London multi agency policy and procedures. Reports are referred to Local Authority social care through the MASH rated red, amber or green, to highlight vulnerability & for decisions to be made on onward dissemination of information. Health services are represented in almost all of London's MASHs. Most London boroughs have also established a Community Multi-agency Risk Assessment Conference (CMARAC) to manage risks identified for the most vulnerable adults coming to notice.

DBS checks (1) Question No: 2018/1734 Caroline Pidgeon What is the current average length of time for the Metropolitan Police Service to complete an Enhanced DBS Check?

The Mayor

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) performance on Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS) checks has improved immensely. The average length of time to complete an enhanced DBS check is, as of July 2018, less than 19 days.

The MPS deals with more than 6,000 enhanced applications each week. An enhanced Criminal Records check can include convictions, cautions, warnings, reprimands as well as other incidents such as where the individual was never arrested, charged or prosecuted.

Basic DBS checks, consisting of convictions and conditional cautions that are not spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, are dealt with directly by the DBS.

Page 78 DBS checks (2) Question No: 2018/1735 Caroline Pidgeon In response to Question 2016/4867 you said the Metropolitan Police Service aimed to reduce the 'Work in Progress' for Enhanced DBS applications to the region of 30-35,000 applications. How many applications are currently in progress?

The Mayor

As of July 2018, the Work in Progress (WiP) is 17,970.

This is far below the original 30-35,000 target and a testament to MPS hard work to significantly and consistently improve its service provision around enhanced DBS checks.

SoundSkool Question No: 2018/1736 Caroline Pidgeon What are you doing to save the closure of SoundSkool in Enfield, which is thought to be helping children from falling into a path of violence?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

It's vitally important that this type of educational course in north London is maintained and I have been reassured by the college that provision has been secured for students to continue their work at other sites. Unfortunately, I am not in a position to offer funding to organisations without an open and transparent tendering process.

There have been recent opportunities to apply for funding through the knife crime community seed funding process and most recently through my Young Londoners Fund, where I've allocated £45 million over three years to support positive youth activities for young people.

Page 79 Spending on promotional material Question No: 2018/1737 Caroline Pidgeon How much money has been spent on 'Mayor of London' online promotional material, such as Facebook and Twitter adverts? Please provide a breakdown per social media site for each month of the last year.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The GLA only uses paid advertising across multiple channels to engage directly with Londoners, to promote London and promote the work and programmes of the Greater London Authority. Recent campaigns include:

London Needs You Alive

Help rough sleepers

New Year's Eve fireworks

The Events for London programme

The Homes for Londoners portal

The Digital Talent Programme

Pride

London Is Open

Clean Air

The GLA does not use paid advertising on any social media platforms to solely promote the 'Mayor of London' brand or any associated social media accounts. Below is a breakdown of paid media spend that has been delivered through 'Mayor of London' accounts:

Page 80 London Stadium staff Question No: 2018/1738 Caroline Pidgeon In response to Question 2017/0379 you said that some match day staff at the London Stadium who were employees of sub-contracting firms were not being paid the London Living Wage and that you would urgently seek to ensure this was put right. Are they now being paid the London Living Wage?

The Mayor

The London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) is a London Living Wage (LLW) employer, and ensures that all its direct employees, interns, and apprentices are paid at least the LLW. The LLDC has made it a contractual requirement for its main construction contractors and end-use contractors to pay the LLW to their directly-employed staff. The London Stadium is managed by such a main contractor and as a result their directly-employed staff have always have been paid at or above the LLW.

I have also required that match day staff who are employees of sub-contracting firms are paid the LLW. Stewarding and security contracts are in the final stages of being retendered, and the new agreements will include payment of the LLW. The catering contract is also being worked on, and LLDC officers will ensure that these remaining sub-contracted staff receive the LLW as soon as this process allows.

Construction licensing Question No: 2018/1739 Caroline Pidgeon The Federation of Master Builders recently launched a research report calling for a mandatory licensing scheme across the construction industry. Do you agree that this would ensure a minimum level of competence in London and reap health and safety benefits in the sector? Will you support this campaign?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 81 Knife bins Question No: 2018/1740 Caroline Pidgeon In response to Question 2018/1330 you said the Metropolitan Police Service had set aside some money towards commissioning future provision of knife bins. How much money has been set aside?

The Mayor

The Mayor allocated an extra £15m of funding for the Met to tackle knife crime in this years funding, whilst the government has been cutting funding for policing in London. Within this funding, the Met has allocated a proportion for innovative and preventive resources, one of which is knife bins, and they are currently reviewing where these are and how many more will be purchased.

Cardiff Model Question No: 2018/1741 Caroline Pidgeon In response to Question 2018/1335 you said Chelsea and Westminster emergency department were now collecting assault data but this was not being shared. Why are they not sharing this data and what are you doing to persuade them of the importance of doing so?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 82 Unstaffed London Underground stations (1) Question No: 2018/1742 Caroline Pidgeon What actions are Transport for London taking to address the rise in incidences of unstaffed stations, especially on the Central Line, as highlighted by the RMT Union on the 6 July 2018?

The Mayor

All London Underground (LU) stations are rostered to be staffed during operating hours. Stations located underground have specific staffing requirements and minimum staff numbers, which vary depending on the size of the station. This is a fire regulation requirement arising from King's Cross fire in 1987.

While there is no regulatory or legal requirement for LU's above ground stations to remain staffed when services are operating, TfL continues to plan to staff all stations at all such times. Sometimes operational requirements may mean that some above ground stations become unstaffed temporarily, for example when an incident occurs elsewhere on the line and the assistance of another member of staff is required. During these times the gates are temporarily left open, and the station remains safe to operate. This only ever relates to above ground stations.

TfL's system of prioritisation means it is generally the quietest stations that may temporarily unstaffed, as staff are moved to higher priority locations. The Central Line has a relatively high number of above ground stations, it will therefore always feature more highly than other lines. Instances of unstaffed stations on the Central Line are not, however, increasing.

TfL will continue to monitor the level of staffing across the network to ensure that customers are kept safe and receive the best possible level of service and assistance at all times.

Unstaffed London Underground stations (2) Question No: 2018/1743 Caroline Pidgeon In answer to Question 2017/4904 about unstaffed London Underground stations, you stated that by Spring 2018 Transport for London (TfL)will seek to publish information online about the incidents of unstaffed London Underground stations. Why has this information not yet been published by TfL?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

TfL apologises that this has taken longer than anticipated. The information is currently being finalised and will be published in August. I have asked TfL to keep you updated.

Page 83 Pausing of non-essential road improvements Question No: 2018/1744 Caroline Pidgeon Following the announcement on the 21 February 2018 that all 'non-essential' road improvements have been paused for two years, how is Transport for London (TfL) responding to calls for potholes to be repaired on TfL routes, especially in relation to potholes which could hinder safe cycling?

The Mayor

TfL's budget is £700m a year lower after the Government's decision in 2015 to remove the operating grant. The previous Mayor failed to defend London's transport subsidy when the Government decided to withdraw it, despite knowing how important the success of London is to the rest of the UK.

The two year pause of 'non-essential' works - a decision TfL was forced to make following the Government's decision in 2015 to remove £700m a year of operating grant - applies to road renewals, such as resurfacing lengths of carriageway. There is no pause to the repair of potholes or other safety defects because this work is essential.

Transport for London (TfL) will maintain safety for all road users, including cyclists, by continuing to carry out regular safety inspections on all of its roads. This will allow it to identify and repair potholes and other safety defects in accordance with industry guidance and good practice.

TfL will monitor the impact of the renewals pause on road condition and listens carefully to feedback from all road users. If there are any indications that the pause may compromise safety, it will take the necessary steps to address this, which may include essential repairs or enhanced inspection regimes.

Page 84 Potholes and repairs on Transport for London Road Network Question No: 2018/1745 Caroline Pidgeon Please provide the current financial year list of potholes and road repairs Transport for London has assessed need to be fixed and the timescales for doing so. Please also provide the same list for the previous financial year.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

During 2017-18, 3278 potholes and related repairs were fixed on the Transport for London (TfL) Road Network. This financial year 1,070 potholes and related repairs have been completed so far.

TfL requires defects identified on its roads as emergency or urgent repairs to be either (a) temporarily repaired within 24 hours; (b) permanently repaired within 24 hours or (c) made safe within 24 hours. Non-urgent repairs are required to be permanently repaired within 7 calendar days or 28 calendar days, dependant on the nature of the defect.

Heathrow noise insulation compensation scheme Question No: 2018/1748 Caroline Russell A third runway at Heathrow Airport would worsen Londoners' exposure to noise. An additional 300,000 people would be affected. To mitigate the impact on communities, the Secretary of State for Transport is proposing a noise insulation compensation scheme to help fund replacement windows, secondary glazing and other measures in homes, schools and community buildings. Do you agree that it will do nothing to compensate Londoners for the aircraft noise experienced outdoors in the street or a garden and lead to a deterioration of peoples' health and quality of life?

The Mayor

Analysis by the Civil Aviation Authority undertaken for Government - and released in a recent Freedom of Information request - found that 2.2 million people would experience a significant increase in aircraft noise as a result of a third runway at Heathrow.

The noise compensation measures being proposed are wholly inadequate to address these impacts. This is clearly unacceptable and I will continue to make the case for people's health and quality of life which cannot be sacrificed in this way.

Page 85 Impact of keeping windows closed to block out Heathrow aircraft noise during heatwaves Question No: 2018/1749 Caroline Russell A third runway at Heathrow Airport would worsen Londoners' exposure to noise. An additional 300,000 people would be affected. To mitigate the impact on communities, the Secretary of State for Transport is proposing a noise insulation compensation scheme to help fund replacement windows, secondary glazing and other measures in homes, schools and community buildings. However, during warmer periods and heatwaves when Londoners particularly need the option of opening windows for their comfort and wellbeing, they face exposure to aircraft noise disturbance and being woken up by night or early morning flights. Will you examine the health impacts of this, particularly on vulnerable people, and consider them in your joint legal action against the third runway?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

London City Airport signals expansion Question No: 2018/1750 Caroline Russell The chief executive of London City Airport has said that he will be considering potential options to lift the airport's current cap of 6.5 million passengers and 111,000 flights a year. Given the health and environmental impacts on Londoners, will you make it clear that you oppose any further expansion of flights at City Airport?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 86 Robin Hood energy Question No: 2018/1751 Caroline Russell Within three years of operation as a fully licensed energy supply company, Robin Hood Energy has acquired 115,000 customers and, according to company accounts, made an operating surplus of £202,000. In light of this success story, will you reconsider your decision to tender for the delivery of a white label energy supply company, and instead opt for the fully licensed supply company that your own feasibility report showed would supply a wider range of benefits?

The Mayor

I have previously set out (Mayor's Question 2017/3960) my reasons for tendering for a partner to deliver my Energy for Londoners Supply Company to bring fairer energy prices to Londoners, especially those living in fuel poverty, as well as other environmental outcomes. This tender is now underway, so I am unable to comment further due to the need to respect the confidentiality of the procurement process. As I have said, I will keep the option of moving to my own fully licensed company under review.

Page 87 Higher levels of pollution on Brixton Road Question No: 2018/1752 Caroline Russell In 2017 the air pollution monitoring site on Brixton Road recorded 75 hours of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations above the 200 ug/m3 levels when the legal limit is 18 hours a year. Even with the implementation of your clean bus zone, to date (6 July 2018) 67 hourly exceedances have been recorded this year and, based on this, pollution at the site is on course to be significantly worse than 2017. Could you offer an explanation for this deterioration? What immediate steps will you take to rectify this unacceptable situation?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I have asked my team to work with King's College London to better understand the readings at Brixton Road as a matter of urgency. Air pollutant concentrations are affected by several factors including the weather. For example, the unusually sunny and hot weather we have experienced this year has contributed to a prolonged period of elevated ozone. The complex atmospheric chemistry associated with this may be affecting pollution on Brixton Road.

However, it is important to note that the total number of hourly exceedances on Brixton Road has reduced from 539 in 2016 to 75 in 2017. The development of Brixton's Low Emission Bus Zone began in early 2017 to achieve the launch at the end of the year, so my officers will also be assessing the contribution of this to the improvement between 2016 and 2018.

Brixton Road is set to benefit further from my decision to expand the Ultra Low Emission Zone from 2021. TfL estimate this will reduce NOx emission from road transport across London by 30 per cent as well as taking 100,000 people out of areas with illegal levels of air pollution.

Page 88 Inadequate national target to eliminate avoidable plastic waste Question No: 2018/1753 Caroline Russell The Government document, A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment, published in January 2018, says it will be "working to a target of eliminating avoidable plastic waste by end of 2042." Given the urgency and scale of the problem highlighted in Blue Planet 2, and your policies to cut plastic waste, do you agree that this target is inadequate and needs to be brought forward by at least a decade?

The Mayor

My ambition is for London to send no biodegradable or recyclable waste to landfill by 2026, and by 2030, for 65 per cent of London's municipal waste to be recycled. Specifically, for packaging, I am calling on the Government to set minimum standards of design for reuse and recyclability, and strengthen Extended Producer Responsibility requirements. The Government should review the Packaging Recovery Note (PRN) system to require minimum levels of recycled content in plastic products and should at least match the ambition of the EU which is, for example, aiming for all plastic packaging to be reusable or recyclable by 2030.

Barnet Council proposal to stop separate household food waste collection (2) Question No: 2018/1754 Caroline Russell In answer to my question 2018/1463 you told me that in reference to the London Environment Strategy: "Barnet did not respond during the public consultation on the issue of food waste collection, which was included in the waste policies and proposals" and that "waste authorities have a duty under that Act to undertake their waste responsibilities in such a way as to be in general conformity with the strategy." According to an article in Material Recycling World on 3 July 2018, the leader of Barnet Council said that you: "will not be able to use executive powers to make the authority carry on with separate food waste collection." What is your response to this claim?

The Mayor

I have, under section 356 of the GLA Act, the power to direct a waste authority to take specified action if I consider it necessary for the implementation of the municipal waste provisions of my London Environment Strategy. However, I see this as an option of last resort and only to be used where no other option is available or reasonable.

I am currently in a six-week consultation period with Barnet Council on their plans and the authority is fully cooperating in providing a range of information and data. It would not be appropriate for me to say any more given this live process of dialogue and consultation.

Page 89 Barnet Council proposal to stop separate household food waste collection (3) Question No: 2018/1755 Caroline Russell The reason that Barnet Council had reportedly given for scrapping their separate household food waste collection is: "excessive additional costs." However, the additional cost of sending food waste to incinerators where the gate fees are significantly higher compared to anaerobic digestion, seems to suggest the savings are minimal. Will you ask Barnet Council for details of these alleged savings?

The Mayor

Following Barnet Council's decision on the 5th of June to withdraw the food waste collection service, I formally wrote to the leader of the council, on the 19th of June, and again on the 27th of June, expressing my profound concern at the decision and conveying my intention to direct the authority to stop the implementation of its decision for an initial six-week period. The purpose of this being to set aside a period within which we could seek additional information, data and evidence from the authority that it had used to support its decision and to see if a resolution can be found.

The Leader of the authority, Cllr Richard Cornelius, responded to that letter on the 28th of June and agreed voluntarily to set aside a six-week period to engage in dialogue and consultation.

We are currently within that six-week period and the authority is fully cooperating in providing a range of information and data. This includes all cost information including that of processing/disposal. It would not be appropriate for me to say any more given this live process of dialogue and consultation.

Page 90 Outer London car journeys set to increase by one million each week Question No: 2018/1756 Caroline Russell Research undertaken by the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has identified 450 proposed development sites in London's Green Belt, largely outside the Greater London boundary. The majority of these developments will be car dependent, which CPRE anticipates will add one million new car journeys a week in outer London. What are you doing to prevent this potential new source of air pollution?

The Mayor

I have no powers to prevent development on the Green Belt outside Greater London. I am constructively and collaboratively using my Duty to Cooperate in responding to Local Plans outside London on issues of strategic importance. My officers encourage boroughs outside of London to consider adopting some of the Mayor's strategic transport policy objectives, as set out in the Mayor's Transport Strategy, such as the promotion of the Healthy Streets Approach, rebalancing the transport system towards walking, cycling and public transport, improving air quality and reducing road danger. It is then for local planning authorities outside London to decide how to address their development, including car parking requirements, and I have no powers in this regard.

My strong approach towards protecting London's Green Belt, which is laid out in the draft London Plan, is complemented by the National Planning Policy Framework guidance on development in the Green Belt, which makes it difficult for any authority, including those outside the GLA boundary, to release Green Belt land for development.

Properly protected cycle lanes (1) Question No: 2018/1757 Caroline Russell In answer to my question 2018/1435 you told me that by 2020 you will have delivered more than 30 km of additional protected cycle space. Could you provide a breakdown of which routes this new 30 km will be on, including cycle superhighway routes, and when they will be completed?

The Mayor

I intend to publish a Cycling Delivery Plan in the autumn that will set out the actions that Transport for London, boroughs and other partners will take over the next five years to encourage more Londoners to cycle, and to continue the growth of cycling in London as part of achieving the Mayor's Transport Strategy. The Plan will include full details of my cycling programme, including timescales for new protected cycle routes.

Page 91 Properly protected cycle lanes (2) Question No: 2018/1758 Caroline Russell How many kilometres of properly protected cycle lane were in place when you took up your Mayoralty in 2016? How many of those kilometres were on cycle superhighway routes?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Six new cycle routes Question No: 2018/1759 Caroline Russell In answer to my question 2018/1435 you told me you had a detailed schedule of delivery for the six new cycle routes you announced in January 2018. Will you share this schedule?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

I intend to publish a Cycling Delivery Plan in the autumn that will set out the actions that Transport for London, boroughs and other partners will take over the next five years to encourage more Londoners to cycle, and to continue the growth of cycling in London as part of achieving my Transport Strategy. The Plan will include details of my cycling infrastructure programme, including the six new routes.

Page 92 Healthy Streets score for Highbury Corner Question No: 2018/1760 Caroline Russell In your answer to my question 2016/1983, you told me that once the Healthy Streets Check tool has been established it will be applied to all new schemes. What are the Healthy Streets scores for before and after the Transport for London (TfL) Highbury Corner scheme?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The Highbury Corner Healthy Streets baseline 'before' assessment has been completed. However, as the full detailed design is in the process of being finalised, the 'after' assessment has not yet been completed. Once the assessment has been completed, Transport for London will be happy to share the results with you.

Given the nature of the changes at Highbury Corner, including design features to enhance the walking and cycling environment specifically, the scheme represents an opportunity for a strong alignment to the Healthy Streets Approach.

Highbury Corner scheme implementation Question No: 2018/1761 Caroline Russell Will you ensure that pedestrian and cyclist safety and convenience are prioritised during the implementation of the Highbury Corner scheme?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Safety is Transport for London's highest priority during the works and TfL will also work to make travel as convenient as possible for both cyclists and pedestrians.

Cyclists are advised to use signed alternative routes via Liverpool Road to avoid the works taking place at Highbury Corner. Wayfinding signage is also in place for pedestrians. All signed diversions and routes for cyclists and pedestrians will be reviewed by TfL on a regular basis throughout the scheme implementation.

Page 93 Highbury Corner pedestrian crossing Question No: 2018/1762 Caroline Russell The bridge works have been completed at Highbury Corner but the pedestrian crossing on Holloway Road has not been moved back to its location on the desire line to Highbury and Islington Underground Station. When will the crossing be returned to its original location?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Due to the improvement works taking place at Highbury Corner roundabout, the crossing will remain at its current location for a short while longer. However, TfL is prioritising the station forecourt works so that the crossing can be moved back and re-opened as quickly as possible.

In the meantime, TfL has installed safety barriers and wayfinding signs along both sides of the footway on Holloway Road to encourage pedestrians to use the existing crossing.

Look Up campaign Question No: 2018/1763 Caroline Russell Will you ask Transport for London (TfL) to adopt the recommendations of the Look Up campaign, by introducing announcements that ask commuters to look up to check if any fellow passengers are wearing a "please offer me a seat" badge?

The Mayor

I wholeheartedly support the 'Look Up' campaign. Making transport accessible for everyone is extremely important to me and is one of the priorities in my Transport Strategy. TfL has made real progress in creating a more accessible public transport network in the capital, but we know there is much more we need to do. While we invest record amounts in step-free stations and extra capacity on the transport network, Londoners can help by looking up and seeing if there is someone in greater need of a seat. It can make someone's day.

Working with Corry, TfL is launching announcements to customers in London Underground station halls, on platforms and on trains straight away, building on the momentum her campaign has generated. TfL is also working with her to develop further creative activities and messaging and incorporate these into its existing 'Travel Kind' campaign, which asks customers to consider others when using priority seats.

Page 94 Air conditioning on London buses (1) Question No: 2018/1764 Caroline Russell It has been brought to my attention that London bus drivers have expressed concerns on their Unite social media forums about bus companies failing to maintain air conditioning on buses. Will you ask Transport for London (TfL) to investigate this issue and ensure that bus companies operating in London have fully working air conditioning units on their buses?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I'm disappointed to hear of instances where bus drivers may be working in uncomfortable conditions in one of our warmest summers in years. The quickest way to resolve such issues is for Unite representatives to raise these issues at established staff forums with the bus operators.

Any air-con units not working at full capacity should also be reported by drivers as part of their vehicle condition checks, which take place before any bus goes into service. These enable garage engineers to inspect faults without delay and carry out additional maintenance if necessary. If action isn't happening, there are channels Unite has with Transport for London (TfL) to escalate issues.

Air conditioning on London buses (2) Question No: 2018/1765 Caroline Russell Will you ask Transport for London (TfL) to introduce a maximum working temperature policy for bus drivers?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

London's bus drivers play a vital role in keeping our city moving. I've raised with the Transport for London (TfL) Commissioner the importance of improving driving conditions in this heat. Almost all London buses now have air-conditioned driver cabs, and TfL has written to all London's bus operators about ensuring air conditioning systems are working as they should.

TfL will be checking with the bus operators how driver cab ventilation and air conditioning issues are picked up and equipment is serviced, as drivers should of course be working in a comfortable environment. Bus drivers can also report any technical issues as part of their initial check of the vehicle before they begin their shift to highlight areas for engineers to look into without delay.

Page 95 Weekend opening hours at National Sport Centre Question No: 2018/1766 Caroline Russell I have been informed by a constituent that the Crystal Palace National Sports Centre (NSC) is open until 5 pm at the weekend. Whereas the Copper Box Arena with similar facilities at the Olympic Park is open until 10 pm. Given that both facilities are managed by the leisure contractors of the GLA, Greenwich Leisure Limited (GLL) and that there is a shortage of multi- use sports halls with public access, will you look at extending the weekend opening hours at the NSC?

The Mayor

I can confirm that the NSC at Crystal Palace is open until 5pm at weekends and that the current opening times are in accordance with existing contract terms with GLL. Although the cost of operating the NSC is considerable compared to the Copper Box Arena, I have asked GLA Officers to review weekend opening hours with GLL to determine if attendance numbers would increase enough to cover the cost of opening beyond 5pm.

Exhibition space and draft London Plan (2) Question No: 2018/1767 Caroline Russell In answer to my question 2018/0391 asking whether you had undertaken any specific assessments or audits of London's exhibition space as part of the evidence base for your draft Economic Development Strategy and draft new London Plan, you told me that none had been undertaken as the data available was limited. Since then, as part of your draft London Plan consultation, the Association of Exhibition Organisers (AEO) provided you with their assessment of the significant economic value of this sector. Will you reflect this assessment in your new London Plan and economic development policies?

The Mayor

My officers have analysed all the responses to the consultations on my draft London Plan and draft Economic Development Strategy, and they have reviewed the assessment submitted by the Association of Exhibition Organisers. To inform the London Plan Examination in Public I will be suggesting a number of minor changes to the draft Plan where I consider it to be appropriate. These suggested changes will be made public in the coming weeks.

Spit hoods and body worn video Question No: 2018/1768 Sian Berry Are all Metropolitan Police officers required to have their body worn video cameras turned on when a spit hood is used on a detainee in a police cell or custody suite?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 96 Legal basis for the use of automated facial recognition Question No: 2018/1769 Sian Berry The GLA Oversight Committee recommended that the Mayor: "consider suspending the use of [automated facial recognition] technology until a clear legal framework is in place and MOPAC has conducted a meaningful consultation process." With the Government's Biometrics Strategy only released on 28 June 2018 and a further 12 month process of consultation and policy development expected, when can we expect the Committee's recommendation to be adopted?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

It is right that the Met explores new technologies and evaluates their effectiveness to address the issues that London faces and keep Londoners safe.

The committee will be aware that the London Policing Ethics Panel has very recently published its interim report on the Met's use of Live Facial Recognition. I approved the workplan of the Panel and am pleased to receive their interim report and recommendations. These recommendations set out a clear way forward for the Met's continued trial of this technology. The Met engaged extensively with the Ethics Panel during the development of this report and had already implemented a number of the recommendations made in the report. They will have implemented the remaining ones by the end of July.

Knife crime toolkit Question No: 2018/1770 Sian Berry How will you track and monitor who and what organisations use your new knife crime toolkit, and how will you measure its effectiveness?

The Mayor

The #LNYA (London Needs You Alive) toolkit has been developed to allow audiences to amplify #LNYA and other broader preventive responses to knife crime and a grass roots level.

An online hub has been developed to host the toolkit. We will invite users of the toolkit to submit feedback via the hub, including specific questions with regards to recommended amendments to the toolkit and examples of how the toolkit has been used / proven to be most helpful. A feedback form will be included with the general dissemination of the toolkit.

Analytics tools will also be used to track online promotion and dissemination of the educational toolkit with community groups and educators.

Page 97 Integrated Gangs Strategy (1) Question No: 2018/1771 Sian Berry How long is the Integrated Gangs Strategy, which brings together multi-agencies including the Metropolitan Police together to address gangs in London, going to be piloted for?

The Mayor

This question appears to refer to a strategy, Strategic Ambitions for London - Gangs and Serious Youth Violence, that was completed under the last administration.

Distinct from above-mentioned previous strategy, some boroughs have created multi agency partnership teams to help them respond to youth violence holistically, from both a support and enforcement perspective. MOPAC contributes some funding, through London Crime Prevention Funding, towards these multi agency teams.

Page 98 Integrated Gangs Strategy (2) Question No: 2018/1772 Sian Berry One of the tactics from the failed Metropolitan Police and MOPAC Shield pilot was to threaten the families of those allegedly involved in criminal activity with eviction. The Integrated Gangs Strategy has also adopted this approach.

How many households have been a) threatened with eviction, and b) evicted as a result of this tactic under each of these strategies? Could you also provide a breakdown of the boroughs in which the affected households are located and the total number of people living in these households affected, in addition to alleged gang members?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

As with Mayor's Question 2018/1171, this appears to refer to a strategy and an approach, Strategic Ambitions for London - Gangs and Serious Youth Violence and the Shield pilot, that was completed under the last administration.

There are a variety of powers that allow for housing action where there is evidence of harassment, alarm and distress. Local authorities and Registered Social Landlords have powers to take a range of actions when a member of the household breaches tenancy conditions. The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2015 allows absolute grounds for possession when a person living in a house has been convicted of a serious offence and the offence was committed in the locality. The police have powers to close a premise for up to three months where it is associated with nuisance and disorder.

Use of these powers are not linked, nor were linked, to any previous or current MOPAC strategy. They are just one enforcement option available to Local Authorities to help to reduce anti-social behaviour.

Page 99 Response time when reporting online Question No: 2018/1773 Sian Berry On average, how long does it take for the Metropolitan Police Service to get back in touch with a victim or witness who has reported a crime online? Could you provide the average response time taken in each month, in 2016 and 2017?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

As there are several ways in which the calls are allocated, it is not possible to give an average monthly breakdown of the lifespan of each online crime report from receipt to contact with the victim, without accessing each report individually.

Recording judicial outcomes of hit and run offences Question No: 2018/1774 Sian Berry Thank you for your response to my questions 2018/0986, 2017/2117 and 2016/4612. Could you now provide the collision judicial outcome data for hit and run offences that has been reported using the Case Overview and Preparation Application (COPA) to support traffic collision reporting for each month since June 2017?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

As reported in Mayor's Question 2018/0986, COPA has the ability to report on the collision outcome by way of disposal decision. However, COPA doesn't allow for retrieval of management data on judicial outcomes.

For the offence of failing to stop, the total prosecutions per month since June 2017 is reported in the table. Total volumes are lower in recent months as many of those cases will be currently under investigation. Please see attached Appendix 2018/1774.

Page 100 Budget of the Serious Collision Investigation unit (2) Question No: 2018/1775 Sian Berry Thank you for your response to my question 2018/0981. What was the budget for the Serious Collision Investigation unit in the Metropolitan Police Service in 2015, 2016 and 2017? Could you provide the projected budget for future years?

The Mayor

The budget for the Serious Collision Investigation Unit was as follows:

2015/16 £8.40m

2016/17 £8.43m

2017/18 £8.51m

The MPS are currently business planning to set budgets for 2019/20 onwards; the SCIU budget will be part of this and will be confirmed once all budgets are agreed.

Page 101 No Second Night Out access policies (1) Question No: 2018/1776 Sian Berry A constituent has contacted me concerned that problems with capacity at No Second Night Out hubs can mean a verified rough sleeper added to the Combined Homelessness and Information Network (CHAIN) database is denied subsequent access to the hubs even if they did not receive any support the first time they were referred due to a lack of vacancies. Your new Plan of Action to tackle rough sleeping says you will double the number of outreach workers and give further support to No Second Night Out hubs. This may help reduce the number of rough sleepers who are turned away, but will you also ensure the policy of refusing subsequent access to hubs is changed as well?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

At present, this is the current policy, but exceptions are made where there are concerns around increased vulnerability. I have successful bid for funding for two additional staging posts in the NSNO model which are for people who have an identified route out of the NSNO hub but are waiting for that route to become available and a number of 'safe seats' for verified rough sleepers. I have also supported several London boroughs who bid for resources to open their own assessment centres to relieve some of the burden on NSNO. Once these new services are operational and we can assess their impact I hope that we will be able to review the current policy.

Specialist mental health workers to assess rough sleepers Question No: 2018/1777 Sian Berry Will the team of new specialist mental health workers you referred to in your press release dated 28 June 2018 operate pan-London or in specific boroughs?

The Mayor

It is envisaged that the team will work in specific boroughs with the highest need and no current specialist resource.

Page 102 Delivering planned schemes as community-led Question No: 2018/1778 Sian Berry The Welsh Government has funded a pilot programme to turn planned housing association schemes into cooperatives. Have you approached any housing associations in London to suggest they deliver planned schemes as community-led housing and, if not, will you?

The Mayor

My London Housing Strategy sets out an ambitious agenda to support community-led housing to make a larger contribution to increasing the supply of new homes. To support this agenda, I am providing £250,000 of funding to support the new Community-Led Housing Hub for London.

I agree that housing associations can play a role in supporting community-led housing, and I have asked the hub to provide those housing associations who they are in contact with, with practical support and advice about how they can build their own homes.

Advice for organisations that bid to build affordable homes as part of the Small Sites, Small Builders programme Question No: 2018/1779 Sian Berry Were the 79 organisations that unsuccessfully bid to deliver homes at Cable Street and Christchurch Road be given feedback they can incorporate in any future bids they may make to this programme?

The Mayor

For clarification this referred to organisations that bid for one or more of the ten TfL sites the formed the pilot launch, including Cable Street and Christchurch Road. Where feedback has been asked for it has been provided.

Responding to the Government consultation on longer tenancies Question No: 2018/1780 Sian Berry Will you be responding to the Government's consultation on the barriers to introducing longer tenancies in the private rented sector (https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/overcoming-the-barriers-to-longer- tenancies-in-the-private-rented-sector) setting out the principles for your forthcoming London Model of rights and obligations to be agreed by renters and landlords and will you publish your response when it is submitted?

The Mayor

Yes, please see my response to Mayor's Question 2018/1781.

Page 103 The London Model of private sector tenancies Question No: 2018/1781 Sian Berry How will your London Model of 'a reformed tenancy model for the capital's private rented sector' go further than the Government's new proposals to make renting a more stable option for Londoners?

The Mayor

My London Model proposal makes clear that wholesale, strategic reform is required to address the structural inequalities in the private rented sector, and to make renting into a tenure that is fit for the 21st century. The Government has announced a short consultation, which does not commit to legislation, to consider an extension of the existing, flawed assured shorthold tenancy. While I welcome any focus from Government on security of tenure, a much more comprehensive approach along the lines of my London Model is needed.

Devolution of housing powers Question No: 2018/1782 Sian Berry Could you give an update on your lobbying work to win new powers from Government that would benefit private renters in London?

The Mayor

My team and I continue to lobby for new powers from Government to help private renters in London. My Deputy Mayor for Housing recently raised this with Rishi Sunak MP though given the recent turmoil in Government and, in particular, the rapid turnover of housing ministers, progress on devolution negotiations has been predictably slow. I look forward to restarting discussions on this issue with the new minister Kit Malthouse MP.

Burglaries in commercial properties in Camden (1) Question No: 2018/1783 Sian Berry How many commercial properties in Camden have been burgled in 2017 and 2018? Could you provide a breakdown of burglaries per month.

The Mayor

The table below gives a monthly breakdown of the number of commercial properties that have been burgled in Camden since January 2017, according to MPS recorded crime.

From April 2017 onwards, a new classification of police recorded burglary was introduced, dividing offences into two categories of "residential" and "business and community".

Page 104 "Residential" burglary includes all buildings or parts of buildings that are within the boundary of, or form a part of, a dwelling. It also includes other premises used for residential purposes such as houseboats etc.

"Business and community" burglary includes all buildings or parts of buildings that are used solely for business purposes or are otherwise entirely outside the classification of residential burglary.

It is therefore impossible to compare figures for anything other than all Burglary before and after this point.

Month Total Jan-17 138 Feb-17 132 Mar-17 98 Apr-17 125 May-17 118 Jun-17 105 Jul-17 145 Aug-17 125 Sep-17 110 Oct-17 119 Nov-17 122 Dec-17 91 Jan-18 111 Feb-18 119 Mar-18 117 Apr-18 116 May-18 143 Jun-18 136

Page 105 Burglaries in commercial properties in Camden (2) Question No: 2018/1784 Sian Berry What is the Metropolitan Police Service in Camden doing to proactively reduce commercial burglaries in the borough?

The Mayor

Additional research has been undertaken to identify hotspot locations for focussed activity. Extra patrols are being deployed to these areas, including throughout the night, to prevent further crimes and to hunt for suspects.

Linked crimes have been identified and detective officers will lead on the investigations to identify and arrest offenders.

All burglary venues are visited by Neighbourhood officers and crime prevention advice is given to victims. Surrounding venues are also visited and offered the same crime prevention advice.

Defibrillators in London Underground stations Question No: 2018/1785 Sian Berry In November 2016, there were 213 defibrillators situated across 146 London Underground stations. How many defibrillators are there now and where are they located? Are there plans to introduce anymore in the forthcoming months?

The Mayor

There are currently 214 defibrillators situated across 150 London Underground stations. These are located at the stations listed below.

In addition to these fixed points, London Underground's Network Incident Response Team and British Transport Police medical officers also carry defibrillators, and take these to incidents where customers have fallen ill.

Transport for London is currently investigating installing a further four defibrillators, and will work with the London Ambulance Service to determine the best locations.

Acton Town

Aldgate

Aldgate East

Aldwych

Page 106 Amersham

Angel

Arsenal

Baker Street (there are four defibrillators at the station)

Balham

Bank/Monument (eight)

Barbican

Blackfriars

Bond Street

Bow Road

Brixton

Camden Town

Canada Water

Canary Wharf

Canning Town

Cannon Street

Chalfont & Latimer

Chancery Lane

Charing Cross (five)

Clapham Common

Clapham South

Cockfosters

Covent Garden

Earls Court (three)

Page 107 East Finchley

Edgware

Edgware Road (Bakerloo)

Edgware Road (Circle & Hammersmith)

Elephant & Castle (two)

Embankment (two)

Epping

Euston (four)

Euston Square

Farringdon

Finchley Central

Finchley Road

Finsbury Park

Fulham Broadway

Gants Hill

Gloucester Road

Golders Green

Goodge Street

Great Portland Street

Green Park

Greenford

Hainault

Hammersmith (District & Piccadilly)

Harrow & Wealdstone

Page 108 Harrow on the Hill

Hatton Cross

Heathrow Terminals 123 (two)

Heathrow Terminal 4

Hendon Central

High Barnet

High St Kensington

Highbury & Islington

Holborn (two)

Holland Park

Holloway Road

Hornchurch

Hyde Park

Kennington (two)

Kentish Town

Kew Gardens

Kilburn

Kings Cross (six)

Knightsbridge

Lancaster Gate

Leicester Square

Leytonstone

Liverpool Street (six)

London Bridge (five)

Page 109 Loughton

Maida Vale

Manor House

Mansion House

Marble Arch

Marylebone

Mile End

Moor Park

Moorgate

Morden

Neasden

North Acton

North Greenwich (two)

Northfields

Notting Hill Gate

Old Street

Osterley

Oxford Circus (five)

Paddington (three)

Park Royal

Piccadilly Circus

Pinner

Preston Road

Putney Bridge

Page 110 Queens Park

Queensbury

Queensway

Ravenscourt Park

Rayners Lane

Regent's Park

Rickmansworth

Russel Square

Seven Sisters

Shepherds Bush

Shepherds Bush Market

Sloane Square

South Kensington

Southfields

Southwark

St James's Park (two)

St Johns Wood

St Pauls

Stanmore

Stockwell

Stratford (three)

Sudbury Hill

Swiss Cottage

Temple

Page 111 Tooting Broadway

Tottenham Court Road (two)

Tottenham Hale

Tower Hill

Tufnell Park

Turnham Green

Upney

Upton Park

Uxbridge

Victoria (six)

Walthamstow Central

Warren Street

Waterloo (ten)

Wembley Central

Wembley Park

West Finchley

West Ham

West Ruislip

Westbourne Park

Westminster (two)

White City

Whitechapel

Willesden Green

Wood Green

Page 112 Wood Lane

Woodford

Hampstead Heath Overground station Question No: 2018/1786 Andrew Dismore Part of Hampstead has been left with no ATM, after Barclays Bank's "lease" on their ATM position expired. A suitable replacement position would be the Hampstead Heath Overground station which is close by. There are staff on site most of the time and it is used throughout the day and night so it would be in a fairly well monitored area. Will Transport for London include this site in their review of siting ATMs in their premises?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) is looking at how it can increase the number of ATMs on its network. Traditional hole in the wall ATMs require a large, dedicated secure space, which often limits where ATMs can be placed. TfL is therefore also reviewing the various designs of ATMs to see if there are any which require less space.

All ATMs on TfL's network are installed and managed by a contract provider, and any additional sites like the one suggested at Hampstead Heath would be subject to customer demand and agreement from the provider.

Page 113 Parking bays at Market Place A1 Question No: 2018/1787 Andrew Dismore Recently there has been another parking suspension on the parking bays from 20 Market Place to 32 Market Place- even resulting in a car being forcibly removed/ lifted to a car pound- including days where no work has been going on but still the parking restriction remained. The reason for all these works was that they put the original box for the vehicle charging bay in the wrong place. Do you agree that this is a waste of public money and inconvenience causing additional loss of trade to local businesses?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I apologise to local residents and businesses who were inconvenienced by this work.

Regrettably, contractors working on behalf of Transport for London (TfL) initially put the feeder pillar for the charging point in the wrong location, and parking restrictions had to be put in place for remedial works to be carried out.

TfL obviously had a duty to ensure that the feeder pillar complied with the approved planning application and was installed in the correct location. The cost of the remedial work was met by the contractor. The new charging point is now working and is already being used.

New York police 'Domain Awareness System' Question No: 2018/1788 Andrew Dismore New York police have a 'Domain Awareness System', combining real time information from CCTV cameras, automatic number plate readers (ANPR), chemical and radiation sensors, 911 calls, microphones that can "hear" gunshots, that is fed to all 35,000 NYPD officers who can access it through mobile smart devices. Has the Met considered this approach and do you support it?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 114 London's high streets Question No: 2018/1789 Andrew Dismore Are you concerned that London's high streets are at risk of disappearing?

The Mayor

Each high street in London has its own unique character and fulfils an important economic and social purpose. Beyond retail, high streets are places where Londoners meet, socialise, access services, exercise, eat and drink. That's why I am committed to supporting London's high streets to build resilience and adapt to change.

High streets have evolved to meet the needs of London's communities over generations and I am convinced that this resilience will help them respond to the structural changes that are taking place in the retail market. I am determined to support them as they do so.

In October, I published 'High Streets for All', which the GLA commissioned from We Made That and LSE Cities. This report explores the economic, social and environmental value of London's high streets, and seeks ways to promote their inclusive and diverse nature.

I am also supporting high streets directly through the Good Growth Fund and Crowdfund London, with a third of successful applications to these funds being related to the improvement of high streets and town centres. Through this investment we are bringing forward integrated strategies to support a range of high street uses across retail, leisure and employment.

To go even further, in the coming months I will be publishing an action plan to support the aims of my 'High Streets for All' report.

To ensure we continue to understand the problems that High Streets face, my Regeneration team has convened a High Streets Sounding Board, with representatives from a range of specialists in the sector, to advise me on how best to address some of the challenges the retail sector now faces.

Page 115 London Living Wage Question No: 2018/1790 Andrew Dismore Can you provide an update on your work to encourage businesses to pay the London Living Wage?

The Mayor

Over 1500 employers in the capital have signed up to pay their staff at least the London Living Wage of £10.20 per hour. London has already seen more than a 50 per cent increase in the number of London Living Wage accreditations since I took office. I will continue to promote the benefits of the London Living Wage and campaign for more employers to pay it, especially through my Good Work Standard. I want employers from all sectors - both big and small - and from across the capital - to engage with the principles of my Good Work Standard when it launches later this year.

I also urge business leaders directly to sign up to the Living Wage, for example when I meet with them or by letter. I was pleased to see recently Fulham FC's owner Shahid Khan announcing that the club would become Living Wage accredited following such an approach.

Businesses in London Question No: 2018/1791 Andrew Dismore What concerns are businesses in London raising with you?

The Mayor

I receive frequent feedback from businesses of all sizes and sectors, as well as key business groups and associations, via my Business Advisory Board, the London Business Board, and both mine and my Deputy Mayor for Business' frequent meetings with business leaders. The uncertainty created by the Brexit negotiations, both in terms of market access for trade in services and in goods, and access to talent, have featured most prominently among the concerns that have been raised. Many have also highlighted the need to create the right conditions for growth in London through transport and infrastructure, affordable housing and skills. The rising cost of Business Rates and shortage of affordable workspace continue to be major concerns for London's small business community in particular. My draft Economic Development Strategy sets out such challenges in more detail and my plans to address them.

Page 116 Social Value Act (1) Question No: 2018/1792 Andrew Dismore What are your views on the Government's proposed changes to the Social Value Act and how will this affect London's businesses?

The Mayor

The Minister for the Cabinet Office, David Lidington MP announced Government's intention to extend how the Social Value Act is applied across Central Government procurement. This is intended to encourage organisations that want to work with these public authorities to consider how to improve the social, economic and environmental impacts of their goods and services.

I welcome this move, but I understand Government has also said they have no plans for a minimum standard of social value in central government contracts, which feels like a missed opportunity. As part of my Responsible Procurement Policy, I have asked the GLA Group to routinely consider Social Value outcomes with our suppliers and encourage them to adopt best practice through my Good Work Standard and environmental policies.

Social Value Act (2) Question No: 2018/1793 Andrew Dismore What criteria do you believe that the Government should set for businesses in their changes to the Social Value Act?

The Mayor

I understand Government's plans do not include a minimum standard of social value in central government contracts. As part of the implementation of my Responsible Procurement Policy the GLA Group is exploring the possibility of setting a minimum threshold for social value as some other public authorities in the UK have done.

Page 117 Maternal employment Question No: 2018/1794 Andrew Dismore How are you helping women in London back into skilled employment after having a child?

The Mayor

The maternal employment rate in London is ten percentage points lower than the rest of the country. There are many factors influencing this, not least the cost and availability of flexible, high-quality childcare and we are actively looking at ways to support working parents with their childcare needs through the new Early Years Hubs. Through my Good Work Standard I also aim to influence London's employers to create more high-quality flexible work opportunities so that mothers can re-enter the workforce and progress in their chosen careers.

The ESF 2014-20 Adult Employment programme, currently in development, will have dedicated funding to support mothers to gain the skills they need to get back to work when the time is right for them. With the devolution of the Adult Education Budget to the GLA we expect to be able to do more to get the right learning and training to the Londoners who need it most, including mothers who want to return to the workplace.

London Living Wage (1) Question No: 2018/1795 Andrew Dismore Which sectors are you currently working with to increase the number of Londoners paid the London Living Wage and how are you doing this?

The Mayor

My Deputy Mayor for Business and I have met with hundreds of businesses and organisations spanning retail, hospitality, life sciences, higher education, tech, creative, banking, financial and professional services and more, and we will continue to promote the benefits of the London Living Wage and campaign for more employers to pay it, especially through my Good Work Standard. I want employers from all sectors - both big and small - and from across the capital - to engage with the principles of my Good Work Standard when it launches later this year.

Page 118 London Living Wage (2) Question No: 2018/1796 Andrew Dismore How many businesses are currently London Living Wage accredited?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The latest data from the Living Wage Foundation indicates there are more than 1500 (1537) London Living Wage employers, operating over 3000 (3141) shops, offices and street stalls in the capital.

London Living Wage and Premier League football clubs Question No: 2018/1797 Andrew Dismore Can you update me on your work to encourage the remaining Premier League football clubs in London to pay the London Living Wage?

The Mayor

I have been clear that I expect all Premier League Football clubs in London to pay the London Living Wage. In addition to having previously written to the non-accredited clubs, I most recently wrote to Shahid Khan, Chairman of Fulham FC, to congratulate him on his team's ascendance to the Premier League and press upon him the importance of high profile clubs doing the responsible thing and becoming London Living Wage accredited. I was therefore delighted when he recently announced that Fulham would work towards Living Wage accreditation. I intend to write again to those Premier League clubs that have not yet gained accreditation, or set out their intention to do so, ahead of the start of the new season.

Page 119 Good Work Standard Question No: 2018/1798 Andrew Dismore What stakeholders have you consulted on the formation of the Good Work Standard?

The Mayor

My Good Work Standard was informed by a public call for evidence process. This initially ran from 4 July to 16 August 2017, and was extended to the 18 September to allow some organisations more time to respond. 72 responses were received to a set of consultation questions asking for views about the goals, criteria, opportunities and challenges for employers.

A further feedback session on 22 January 2018 with attendees representing approximately 55 business, public sector, civil society, and trade union organisations allowed officers to consider expert policy input alongside employers' views and address some of the outstanding questions.

My officers continue to engage and consult businesses of all sectors and sizes as we develop the Good Work Standard.

London STEM Strategy Question No: 2018/1799 Andrew Dismore Can you provide an update on the progress of your London STEM Strategy?

The Mayor

In autumn 2016, I gathered together over 60 key stakeholder organisations to discuss a city- wide approach to STEM. The group's recommendations have now been embedded in my Skills for Londoners Strategy and draft Economic Development Strategy, and delivery is now taking place through new and existing programmes.

For example, I am on track to fund 5,000 young Londoners to achieve the CREST Award - the country's top accreditation scheme for STEM projects. My RE:CODE London events will also engage over 3,000 primary students with coding skills by the end of the year. RE:CODE recently achieved national recognition for our innovative partnership with the Institute of Imagination and LEGO, winning the Digital Leader's 'Cross-Sector Digital Collaboration of the Year'.

Page 120 STEM skills Question No: 2018/1800 Andrew Dismore A parliamentary report found that the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and the Department for Education do not currently have sufficient understanding of what specific skills businesses really need or how Brexit will affect the already difficult task of ensuring the supply of STEM skills in the workforce. What can you do to ensure STEM shortages are addressed in London?

The Mayor

In June, I published London's first ever skills and adult education strategy - Skills for Londoners. As part of the strategy, by the end of this year I will establish the London Occupational Skills Board, which will convene business and employer representatives to advise on how to improve and align skills provision, including specialist and higher-level skills provision, to meet skills needs in London. I will also commission analysis of how skills provision in London matches up to labour market need across London's sectors, to help identify the challenges that are facing London's economy. This will help to inform skills interventions in priority areas like STEM.

STEM and equality Question No: 2018/1801 Andrew Dismore What progress is being made on your programmes to increase the number of female and BAME Londoners taking up STEM skills?

The Mayor

I have invested £7m in my Digital Talent Programme, which aims to support more young women and young Londoners from diverse ethnic and disadvantaged backgrounds to enter digital occupations. We are currently funding six new digital skills training courses for 1,000 Londoners, including 'digital bootcamp' courses across a range of digital specialisms. The higher-level digital skills training strand of this programme is currently going through procurement, and a comprehensive 'educator' continued professional development package is going out to tender.

I am also developing comprehensive European Social Fund skills programmes, targeted at 'at- risk' individuals, with a focus on digital and STEM skills. In addition, I have funded over 2,500 pupils from groups that are typically underrepresented in STEM to achieve the CREST Award - the country's top accreditation scheme for STEM projects. This number will double by 2019.

Page 121 Universal Credit Question No: 2018/1802 Andrew Dismore Will you be responding to the Government's consultation which proposes to move all existing claimants of a working age income-related benefit to Universal Credit?

The Mayor

Universal Credit has the potential to improve and simplify work incentives. But as has been repeatedly demonstrated, most recently by the National Audit Office, the way in which it has been implemented has caused significant hardship to far too many claimants.

Until now, these problems have only affected new benefit claimants or those who have undergone a change of circumstance. The Government's proposed 'managed migration' of all remaining working-age benefit claimants next year poses a significant threat of harm being caused on a much larger scale.

As such, I will be responding to the Social Security Advisory Committee's consultation to ensure the Government approaches the migration in a way that protects the most vulnerable Londoners.

Threat to Ancient Woodland Question No: 2018/1803 Len Duvall Is the Mayor aware, and is he concerned, of the potential loss of a large number of trees, Ancient Woodland/Site of Importance for Nature Conservation in an area known as Hillcrest Woods, Sydenham in the London Borough of Lewisham and what will the Mayor do about it??

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 25/07/2018

I am of course concerned if proposed development results in the loss of large numbers of trees or ancient woodland. The London Plan seeks to protect trees and woodland, and requires Local Plans to ‘protect veteran trees and ancient woodland where these are not already part of a protected site’. In the draft London Plan I have strengthened policy to require that any trees that are removed for development are adequately replaced to provide the same value to local people. I would expect London boroughs to make planning decisions that take due regard of these policy frameworks.

The potential loss of trees and ancient woodland in this case would result from a planning application that will be determined by the London Borough of Lewisham as the local planning authority. The planning application does not meet the thresholds that require it to be referred to me for comment.

Page 122 Protecting Useable Green Open Space Question No: 2018/1804 Len Duvall Given the limitations of the existing London Plan, in what circumstances will you, as Mayor, use existing powers or influence in protecting community useable Green Open Space?

The Mayor

I understand how important green and open spaces are to the wellbeing of Londoners.

Boroughs are required to refer applications for development of more than 1,000 sqm of floorspace on Green Belt or Metropolitan Open Land to me for consultation. Where these are not consistent with London Plan policy I can exercise my powers to call in the application or direct refusal. I do not have powers to intervene on proposals for development on open space that do not meet the criteria for referable applications. These applications are the responsibility of the local planning authority but must still be determined in line with the development plan, which for London boroughs includes the London Plan. My draft new London Plan sets out improved policies to protect and enhance open spaces and green infrastructure.

In addition, my recently-published London Environment Strategy sets out how I will support boroughs and local communities to improve and enhance local green spaces. This includes the establishment of a Green Spaces Commission to assist boroughs in identifying new ways to secure resources and investment in their parks and green spaces and my Greener City Fund, which is providing £12 million in grants to help local groups improve community green spaces and plant trees, and to support boroughs in the transformation of 6 major green spaces.

Transport for London Plans Question No: 2018/1805 Len Duvall Will Transport for London consider enhancing its current plans in mitigating potential disproportionate and adverse impact on residents in regard to the Silvertown Tunnel project?

The Mayor

Page 123 Failing Schools Question No: 2018/1806 Len Duvall Do the findings of the Annual London Education report support the notion that Local Authorities should have a greater role in improving all schools found to be inadequate whether maintained or Academy schools? Will you examine the recent research which showed that Councils are best placed when it comes to boosting the inspection grades of failing schools? Will you give an assurance that you will work with London Councils to inform Government that in order to achieve better results Local Authorities need to be properly resourced and supported in this work?

The Mayor

The recent School Performance in Academy Chains and Local Authorities report from the Education Policy Institute, which was released after the 2017 London Education Report, recognises that Local Authorities have a much-needed role to play in supporting failing schools.

This role will only be possible if Local Authorities are appropriately funded. I have called on the Government to reconsider making cuts to education that will unfairly penalise London schools, teachers and pupils, and instead do more to support the recruitment and retention of teachers if we are to avoid a future crisis in school leadership.

I will continue my collaboration with London Councils to ensure that this government understands the need for properly resourced Local Authorities to support valuable school improvement work, amongst their other multiple functions.

Kennington Police Station (1) Question No: 2018/1808 Florence Eshalomi Given the interest expressed by community groups in buying Kennington Police Station can the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime explain a) what the sale process is and whether community groups will be able to bid in a transparent manner alongside any other organisations or private developers? b) What is the proposed timeline for the sale and sale process?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 124 Kennington Police Station (2) Question No: 2018/1809 Florence Eshalomi What does the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime mean by 'best value' in regard to the sale of Kennington Police Station? Does this include factors other than monetary value, such as community value and building use after sale?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Kennington Station Improvements Question No: 2018/1810 Florence Eshalomi Can the Mayor provide an update on the work at Kennington Station and whether or not this is still running to schedule?

The Mayor

The work to improve Kennington station will make it quicker and easier for passengers to change between different branches of the Northern line, and will be essential for those using the new Northern Line Extension from Kennington to Battersea Power Station, which is due for completion in 2020.

I can confirm that the work to improve the station is running to schedule and is due to be completed by mid-September 2018.

Lifts at Brixton Station Question No: 2018/1811 Florence Eshalomi Can the Mayor provide an update on the work to both lifts at Brixton tube station and an update on whether this is still running to schedule?

The Mayor

Lift replacement work at Brixton station started on 12 February 2018. Both lifts at the station are being replaced at the same time to reduce the time taken to complete the works, and minimise the inconvenience to customers.

The work is due to be complete on schedule in September 2018.

Page 125 Summer Holiday activities Question No: 2018/1812 Florence Eshalomi Will the Mayor be publicising on the London.gov.uk website a centralised list of summer holiday activities available to school children in different boroughs?

The Mayor

For a second year, I'm encouraging organisations to share the fantastic things they are doing for young Londoners across the capital by using the hashtag #OurLDNsummer.

This year we are also collecting information about summer holiday activities which will be hosted on the London.gov website and promoted to parents, young people, and youth workers.

Loughborough Junction Station Question No: 2018/1813 Florence Eshalomi What pressure is the Mayor and Transport for London putting on Network Rail to improve the much-needed accessibility at Loughborough Junction station?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 126 Oxford Street Question No: 2018/1814 Florence Eshalomi Section 261 of the Greater London Authority Act states that the "Mayor of London shall keep under review the system of highways and proposed highways in Greater London and the allocation of responsibility for that system between the different local highway authorities. If the Mayor of London considers it expedient that any highway or proposed highway in Greater London, other than a trunk road, should become a GLA road the Greater London Authority may by order direct that that highway or proposed highway shall become a GLA road as from such date as may be specified in that behalf in the order". What consideration, if any, have you given to using Section 261 with regards to Oxford Street?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Currently Westminster City Council is the highway authority for Oxford Street. Having chosen to walk away from the jointly developed project, it is Westminster's responsibility to meet the known challenges to Oxford Street and the surrounding area.

Use of Section 261 powers requires either the consent of the current highway authority or the consent of the Secretary of State for Transport if the proposed move of responsibility is contested by the local authority.

All options remain on the table if Westminster do not act to protect the future of the heart of London's West End. presumption against development on back gardens Question No: 2018/1815 Nicky Gavron The previous London Plan Policy 3.5 includes provision for boroughs to introduce a presumption against development on back gardens or other private residential gardens where this can be locally justified. Which boroughs have introduced such a presumption and which have not?

The Mayor

My Planning Team comments on all boroughs' emerging local plans to ensure they are in general conformity with the London Plan. The adopted London Plan provides for boroughs to introduce a presumption against development on back gardens or other private residential gardens through their local plans, where locally justified. As this is not an issue of conformity with the London Plan, the Planning Team does not have a record of which boroughs' local plans include a presumption against development on back gardens or other private residential gardens.

Page 127 Green Belt Housing Question No: 2018/1816 Nicky Gavron Land use change statistics released by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (published 31 May 2018) show that in Hillingdon twenty-six per cent of new residential addresses in 2016/17 were created in the green belt; 13% in Redbridge and 11% in Bromley. How concerned are you by this development?

The Mayor

I am very concerned with protecting London's Green Belt from inappropriate development, and have set out strong protection for Green Belt land in my draft London Plan.

The Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) for the London Plan shows that the vast majority of residential development in London is delivered on brownfield land. The AMR shows this stands at 98.7 per cent of residential units for 2015/16 and includes breakdowns for individual boroughs. My officers are currently producing the latest AMR, which will cover the period 2016/17.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) report covers the period 2013-2017 and does not provide detailed data behind the proportion of development in each borough that was on Green Belt land. Further analysis of these figures, allowing us to understand how they relate to those in the London Plan AMR, is therefore not possible. The report does indicate, however, that in 2016/17, 51 per cent of all new residential addresses created in the Green Belt were provided on previously developed land.

Habitats Regulations Assessments Question No: 2018/1817 Nicky Gavron What effect, if any, will the recent judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union related to habitats regulations assessments have on your Draft London Plan?

The Mayor

The full implications of the recent EU 'Sweetman ruling' is still being considered by Natural England, the Government's statutory advisors. Their initial advice suggests that this judgment has no implications for the draft London Plan.

The ruling requires a clear distinction in the Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) between mitigation measures specifically designed to avoid or reduce harmful impacts on European sites, and those which are not directly related to maintaining the integrity of the European site - such as measures to reduce air pollution to improve human health, for example.

As London Plan policies fall into the latter category, advice from Natural England suggests that the Sweetman ruling is not relevant.

Page 128 Good Design Question No: 2018/1818 Nicky Gavron "Building More, Building Beautiful: how design and style can unlock the housing crisis" by the Policy Exchange think-tank, identifies high land prices paid by developers as a key factor in the number of poorly-designed developments. How concerned are you by this report given the Draft London Plan's focus on Good Design?

The Mayor

It is clear that over recent years some developers have overpaid for development sites and then sought to recover the excess at the expense of planning obligations, affordable housing or design quality.

Since I became Mayor, I have been very clear that this is unacceptable. One of my first actions as Mayor was to introduce detailed planning guidance setting out how the viability of a proposed development should be assessed. This confirms that the price paid for land is not a relevant consideration in assessing the viability of a scheme. Developers who overpay for land do so at their own risk - the costs cannot be recovered through compromised design, reduced planning contributions or reduced levels of affordable housing.

My draft London Plan emphasises the importance of good design for all new development. While national policy makes viability a consideration, it is not a free pass for poor development - national policy supports my position that planning permission should not be granted for unacceptable development.

Breast Screening Services in London Question No: 2018/1821 Joanne McCartney Figures from the NHS show that take up of breast screening services in parts of London are as low as 50%. What actions can you take to encourage more Londoners to take up this service?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I am encouraged that breast screening rates in London have improved in recent years, although rates are variable across London and remain lower than in England as a whole. I understand from the NHS that since 2015, London has implemented a range of interventions to improve breast screening uptake including text reminders, pre-invitation letters and second-timed appointments. As part of my commitment to champion the NHS I am exploring ways in which I might promote a range of NHS campaigns including breast screening.

Page 129 Noise Pollution on Great Cambridge Road Question No: 2018/1822 Joanne McCartney A resident has contacted me about the noise pollution at his property at the junction of Southbury Road and the A10 Great Cambridge Road. He has asked if Transport for London can look into measures to reduce the impact on the A10 of traffic noise for residents living along this section of road?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) is working to reduce noise in this area. This includes speed monitoring and in February 2018, TfL installed three flexible deployment cameras along this stretch to monitor compliance with the 40 miles per hour speed limit. The data from these cameras helps to prioritise police speed enforcement deployments and lower speeds in the area will reduce noise from vehicles.

TfL also reviewed the traffic signals at this location in November 2017. On the Southbury Road junction, changes were made to improve the progression of vehicles through the traffic signals. This has reduced the number of vehicles waiting at the junction.

TfL will continue to monitor the above interventions to see if further measures are required to mitigate noise pollution.

Page 130 Walking Children to School Question No: 2018/1823 Joanne McCartney Large numbers of parents feel unsafe allowing their children to make the journey to school on foot due to factors like road safety and 'stranger danger'. According to the Living Streets Report "Swap the School Run for a School Walk" some 60% of parents say speed of traffic outside the school gates was one of their biggest worries when walking and 30% of parents said volume of traffic was a concern. What are you doing to change this?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

My Transport Strategy highlights the importance of people feeling safe using London's streets, so that they feel confident to walk, cycle, and use public transport. I want parents to be happy to let their children walk to school in our city, enabling our future generations to get the physical activity they require to stay healthy.

London has a wide ranging programme to reduce road danger. A vital part of this is introducing lower speed limits in areas where many people are walking, such as outside schools. I am investing record levels in walking and cycling, and encouraging boroughs to deliver Healthy Routes to Schools through Local Implementation Plans and Liveable Neighbourhoods.

I have recently published my Vision Zero action plan and Walking Plan which includes further details on how I plan to address road danger and enable more children to walk to school.

Page 131 Cultural Activities for Elderly Londoners Question No: 2018/1824 Joanne McCartney According to a report by Age UK "Creative and Cultural Activities and Wellbeing in Later Life", creative and cultural participation is one of the most crucial factor in wellbeing in later life. What are you doing to:

(a) increase the number of creative and cultural activities for elderly people?

(b) make sure creative and cultural activities are accessible for elderly people?

The Mayor

Participation in culture and the arts has a positive impact on people's lives, makes people healthier and happier and brings different communities together. In particular, participation in cultural activities reduces isolation and can help improve older people's wellbeing.

This is why I have made culture a top priority. I am delivering bold new programmes to enable cultural participation for all Londoners, including older people.

For example, my new London Borough of Culture Award will create opportunities for older people to participate and volunteer in Waltham Forest and Brent, as well in six other boroughs through the Cultural Impact Awards; particularly Lewisham who will create the first ever Festival of Creative Ageing involving older people in creating a programme of films, exhibitions and performances by older artists such as Sadler's Wells' Company of Elders.

Older people are also benefiting from Culture Seeds funding. For example, 'Music for the Mind' in Redbridge will offer singing and music workshops in residential care homes, and 'Learning Through the Arts' in Brent will support creative workshops in Ashford Place community centre promoting friendships.

I am making the largest investment in culture than any other Mayor which will increase access to culture for older people. My support to relocate the Museum of London to West Smithfields will reach over 2m visitors and include dementia-friendly activities. And East Bank, the new culture and education district at Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park will offer new cultural activities including for older Londoners.

Also, working with organisations including Age UK and Silverline, older people are encouraged to volunteer through Team London and all our events programme aim to achieve Bronze Charter standard so that they are accessible to all.

Page 132 Tottenham Lock 17 Development Question No: 2018/1825 Joanne McCartney Concerned residents have asked me to raise the issue of developers marketing homes oversees, such as those at the Lock17 Development in Tottenham Hale which are being marketed to investors in Hong Kong. Can you ensure that new homes built as part of the Hale Wharf development are offered to local people and Londoners first? What more can you do to ensure that these homes are offered to Londoners first and can you make this a requirement when granting permission for new homes?

The Mayor

I can confirm that Muse, who are developing Hale Wharf, are in the process of signing up to the industry's voluntary 'first dibs' offer, which restricts sales of homes under £350,000 to UK residents for the first 3 months of availability, and for some homes, for Londoners for up to the first month.

I have already signed up some of London's largest homebuilders to the pledge and will continue to encourage more to do so, whilst keeping its effectiveness under review.

Page 133 Mental health support for military personnel and veterans Question No: 2018/1826 Onkar Sahota In light of World Armed Forces Day, and from what we know of the realities of the need for, and lack of, good mental health services for veterans and members of the armed forces, how will the Mayor ensure the work of Thrive LDN is reaching out to and supporting those who serve and have served?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Most veterans and members of the armed forces do not experience mental health problems. For those that do however, it is crucially important that they receive timely and appropriate support.

One of our key Thrive LDN partners, the NHS, have developed dedicated mental health services for service personnel: the NHS Veterans' Mental Health Transition, Intervention and Liaison Service (TILS) and the NHS Veterans' Mental Health Complex Treatment Service (CTS). Further information can be found here https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/armed- forces/veterans-mental-health-services/

Thrive LDN launched its new campaign on 2 July. We want to ensure that all Londoners have an equal opportunity for good mental health. Through open conversations and partnership working, Thrive LDN aims to identify further opportunities for working with vulnerable groups such as veterans. All Londoners have a right to thrive.

Page 134 Knife Crime Strategy Update Question No: 2018/1827 Onkar Sahota In light of the awful attack on at 18 year old in my constituency, who was found with multiple stab wounds in Coldharbour Lane in Hillingdon, how is the Mayor's work to tackle knife crime in the capital progressing, and what reassurances of progress can he offer to my constituents?

The Mayor

It is completely unacceptable that young people in our city continue to fall victim to serious violence and knife crime. This violence has no place on our streets. You have my full support.

I am delivering a strong knife crime strategy, backed up with significant funding to help the Met and preventative services address this issue. The delivery of the strategy is progressing well and I have invested a £110m increase in Met funding in 2018-19 compared to the previous year and £45m over 3 years to fund positive youth activities for young people at risk of getting caught up in crime. This is in addition to £1.15m to support grass-roots community groups.

The security and the safety of Londoners is my key priority. Since 2014 crime has been going up in London, and across England and wales. Whilst I fully appreciate it is not a consolation if you are the victim of crime or if you're a bereaved family, but the fact is, crime is going up less in London than the rest of the country.

I will continue to relentlessly focus on both enforcement and prevention - funding services for young people which give them a path away from crime. To support this and the delivery of my strategy, I convened a meeting in June with all Leaders and Chief Executives to share best practice and discuss how we can support boroughs better in their work to reduce violence. This will inform the local borough knife crime action plans, which are now in place for each London borough.

As specific reassurance for residents, I am also investing in enforcement activities and have allocated the Met an extra £15m to tackle knife crime through the Violent Crime Task Force. The Taskforce is working hard to proactively target offenders & remove weapons from our streets.

Page 135 Air quality in Hillingdon Question No: 2018/1828 Onkar Sahota With stats showing Hillingdon is one of the most polluted boroughs in London, how well does the Mayor believe the local council has been able to work with him to deliver a cleaner environment locally?

The Mayor

Hillingdon submitted a report to the GLA on progress with their Air Quality Action Plan in 2017. This showed good progress against many of the actions, most notably in Air Quality Focus Areas, where initiatives include no idling areas, a more stringent approach for new developments, and an electric vehicle trial with businesses.

However - as is the case across London - there is more that boroughs can do, such as expanding electric vehicle infrastructure and delivering more air quality schools audits using my new schools toolkit. I am supporting boroughs to take action through funding streams such as the Mayor's Air Quality Fund, schools audit funding, and the Greener City Fund.

My officers are revising the Cleaner Air Borough Criteria as part of a review of the London Local Air Quality Management (LLAQM) system. This review will highlight how boroughs are performing and what opportunities are available for them to deliver cleaner environments locally.

Section 60 - Brent Question No: 2018/1830 Navin Shah How many times has a Section 60 PACE order been issued by the Metropolitan Police Service in Brent? Please provide a breakdown by the years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Section 60 - Harrow Question No: 2018/1831 Navin Shah How many times has a Section 60 PACE order been issued by the Metropolitan Police Service in Harrow? Please provide a breakdown by the years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 136 Dame Judith Hackitt's Review (1) Question No: 2018/1832 Navin Shah It's almost a month since 'The Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety' report was published. What is your overall view on the report and what action have you taken as Mayor to address the issues raised in her report?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I will be writing to Ministers with my formal response to Dame Judith's report shortly and I will send you a copy when I do so.

Dame Judith Hackitt's Review (2) Question No: 2018/1833 Navin Shah I am concerned about desktop studies being used as an attempt to approve safety compliance. Will you lobby the Government against this, as this would provide the clarity for building owners and building industry who need to know what they can use to replace dangerous cladding and insulation and help keep buildings safer?

The Mayor

I share your concern at the use of desktop studies as a route to compliance for materials used in cladding systems. On 25 May 2018 I wrote to the Secretary of State James Brokenshire arguing that, in the absence of any strict parameters governing their use, a total ban on desktop studies should be implemented. I will continue to put pressure on the Government to implement this ban as part of wider reforms to building regulations.

Dame Judith Hackitt's Review (3) Question No: 2018/1834 Navin Shah Have you made recommendations to Government following Dame Judith Hackitt's review to ensure that new construction, refurbishment and ongoing management of buildings benefit from a robust and safe framework of regulations, site supervision and management by owners/applicants such as local authorities, housing associations and private sector?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Please see Mayor's Question 2018/1832

Page 137 Dame Judith Hackitt's Review - combustible materials (1) Question No: 2018/1835 Navin Shah Will you lobby Government for a temporary ban on the use of combustible materials on complex and high-rise buildings and until we have a regulatory and testing system which is fit for purpose?

The Mayor

Please see response to Mayor's Question 2018/1832

Dame Judith Hackitt's Review - combustible materials (2) Question No: 2018/1836 Navin Shah The Government has announced they will now consult on the use of combustible cladding in England and have made a £400m commitment to remove combustible cladding. Will you be responding to the consultation?

The Mayor

Yes. I have already called for a ban on the use of combustible materials on the external walls of high rise buildings in England and I will be reiterating this in my response to the consultation.

Page 138 Harrow-on-the-Hill Station: Step-free Access update Question No: 2018/1837 Navin Shah I am happy that Harrow-on-the-Hill station was one of the first stations you committed to making step-free access under your £200m step-free accessibility programme. Can I have an update on what work has been done so far?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Work is progressing well at Harrow-on-the-Hill.

The design and build contract has been awarded to Taylor Woodrow Bam Nuttall and the detailed design stage and construction work have now started.

Four lifts have already been placed on order and enabling works have been completed to make room for the lifts on platforms 1 to 4. Station staff facilities have also been reorganised to make space for the north lift, and a temporary customer information point has been installed on platforms 5 and 6.

I understand that my Deputy Mayor for Transport has agreed to meet with you to discuss this progress in more detail.

Page 139 Stanmore Station: Step Free Access (1) Question No: 2018/1838 Navin Shah Thank you for your answer to Question 2018/1230. I strongly disagree that Stanmore Station does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the Transport for London (TfL) accessibility programme. This is not the view and experience of local residents, commuters, stakeholders such as Aspire, the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital and local resident associations. The former Deputy Mayor for Transport after her visit to the station agreed that the station was far from step-free. Your £200m accessibility fund is hugely welcomed but will you ask TfL to immediately reverse its position and include Stanmore station in the priority list of step-free stations?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) fully understands that the current 'step-free' arrangements at Stanmore are less than satisfactory. It is currently investigating ways to unlock third party funding that could improve step free access for passengers at Stanmore. I understand that a meeting has been arranged with you, the Deputy Mayor for Transport and TfL senior officers from the step-free programme to discuss this in more detail.

Stanmore Station: Step Free Access (2) Question No: 2018/1839 Navin Shah Months ago, my residents and I were told there was a new feasibility study undertaken for step free access but there is no sign of this? May I have a copy of the report?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

A detailed feasibility report was completed in 2016. I understand that a meeting has been arranged with you, the Deputy Mayor for Transport and Transport for London (TfL) senior officers, to discuss step-free access at Stanmore station and this report will be shared with you then.

Page 140 Smartwater (1) Question No: 2018/1840 Navin Shah Following the introduction of Smartwater/MetTrace has any attempt been made to its efficacy and whether it is providing value for money.

1. Could you provide figures broken down appropriately for the smartwater/MetTrace scheme as a cost annually?

2. Could you supply figures broken down appropriately for:

A). How many items of stolen property and their value have been returned to their owners through Smartwater/MetTrace; and

B).What proportion of burgled properties had Smartwater/Met Trace stickers compared to properties without them.

The Mayor

I am unable to reveal the cost of MetTrace at this time. These figures are commercially sensitive and will also potentially disadvantage MPS should they procure again later this year.

Although there are many known cases where items are returned to their owners thanks to MetTrace, MPS do not routinely record this information so it is not possible to provide a figure. Work is underway to make sure this information is captured going forward.

Burglaries in MetTrace areas have reduced by 22.2% (5,775 offences), compared to an increase of 1.6% (2,055 offences) in non-MetTrace areas. Based on the Home Office Integrated Offender Management Value for Money Toolkit the wider cost to society saved is £26,220,134.

Page 141 Smartwater (2) Question No: 2018/1841 Navin Shah Has any investigation been made to compare burglary rates for houses with Smartwater stickers and those without?

The Mayor

Every household that is given a MetTrace kit is encouraged to use the stickers included. MPS do not currently record how many households chose to display the stickers.

However, since the start of the initiative, burglaries in MetTrace areas have reduced by 22.2% (5,775 offences), compared to an increase of 1.6% (2,055 offences) in non-MetTrace areas.

Factory Made Housing Question No: 2018/1842 Navin Shah 'New London Architecture' are investigating how far modern methods of construction can support improving the delivery, viability and quality of London's housing. I appreciate your support for such innovative and much needed methods and systems to rapidly address London's housing crisis. What support are you providing to the building industry and professions to escalate the production of modular units. How many schemes currently are under way or completed in London from 2017 to date using factory made system(s)?

The Mayor

I am supporting the market to grow in scale, by promoting standardisation and developing a toolkit to identify how different precision-manufactured housing systems could be used on specific sites.

It is difficult to say exactly how many schemes use precision manufacturing in London, as data on construction methods has not been routinely collected. To address this, we are looking at how we might collect data more systematically as part of the Affordable Homes Programme. The Innovation Fund provides funding for new ways of delivering more affordable homes. The Fund has already supported the delivery of 318 precision-manufactured units, with further schemes under discussion.

Page 142 Double Decker Buses on Northwick Avenue Question No: 2018/1843 Navin Shah Thank you for your answer to Question 2018/1681. Can you please let me know when will the new operator be actually implementing the new scheme where double decker buses operate only during peak time?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

As stated in my answer to Mayor's Question 2018/1681, residents should notice fewer double deckers in Northwick Avenue outside peak hours from September. The new contract begins on 1 September 2018.

Gig economy Question No: 2018/1845 Fiona Twycross Is time up on workers being exploited in the gig economy in London?

The Mayor

The nature of the 'gig economy' model raises a number of challenges for those it employs, and I have been clear that any exploitative practices are completely unacceptable. The Matthew Taylor review into modern employment practices proposed steps the Government could take to improve the rights of workers within the 'gig economy', as well as those working through agencies or on zero hours contracts.

I am frustrated by the Government's apparent lack of urgency in bringing forward solutions to these problems, and I am seeking a meeting with the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy to push the case for the Government bringing concrete proposals forward quickly. Before the end of the year I will also have published my Good Work Standard that will outline measures all responsible employers should take up to ensure they meet their responsibilities to their employees.

Page 143 Suicide rate Question No: 2018/1846 Fiona Twycross The suicide rate for young Londoners has risen four times as fast as England and Wales as a whole. How is your Thrive LDN campaign supporting young Londoners?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Improving the mental health and wellbeing of young Londoners is a priority for me and for Thrive LDN. That is why, through the Young Londoners Fund, I have invested an additional £1.125m in Thrive LDN to rollout Youth Mental Health First Aid Training to London state schools over the next three years.

In addition, Thrive LDN has been awarded funding from NHS England to develop a suicide prevention package with the education sector. The project is in the early stages of development and will be launched in the autumn.

Thrive LDN is also working with young Londoners on a cultural programme to coincide with World Mental Health Day on 10 October.

Childcare and Brexit Question No: 2018/1847 Fiona Twycross The number of au pairs has decreased by 75% since the EU referendum, which in turn is impacting on childcare arrangements for families in London. How are you working to address the childcare shortage that Brexit is exacerbating?

The Mayor

I am working with stakeholders to improve access to high quality early education in London.

My Early Years Hubs launched in January this year provide the opportunity for schools, childminders, Private Voluntary and Independent (PVI) nurseries, and others, to work together over a three-year period to promote early years as a career, improve take up of free early education and to improve quality of the early years provision.

I am planning a new programme, using European Social Funds, to help more Londoners who want to move into a career in the early years sector.

Page 144 Single-breadwinner families Question No: 2018/1849 Fiona Twycross The Joseph Rowntree Foundation recently reported that Government benefit cuts are hitting lower-earning households, with single-breadwinner families needing an income boost of 27% in order to meet rising living costs. What action are you taking to ensure lower-income households are protected against the rising costs for food, transport, childcare and energy? What action have you demanded from Government?

The Mayor

The rising cost of living is putting significant strain on Londoners, particularly those on lower incomes. To ensure they are protected I have frozen TfL fares until 2020 and introduced the 'hopper' fare. My Early Years Hubs will help to make childcare more affordable and accessible. Through my Good Work Standard I will be encouraging London's employers to do more to help their employees - for example, by paying the London Living Wage or offering interest free loans for season tickets or childcare deposits.

My Fuel Poverty Action Plan details the actions I am taking to reduce energy costs for low income Londoners, including my £2.5m Warmer Home fund. I am also establishing an energy supply company aiming to offer fairer energy bills to Londoners.

My draft London Food Strategy includes a focus on food insecurity. I will be undertaking research on the extent of household food insecurity in London to inform the development of initiatives to help those struggling to feed their families. This will build upon work my food programme has already done, such as supporting 10 London boroughs to develop their own food poverty action plans.

Earlier this year I wrote to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions asking her to address the flaws in Universal Credit which were causing financial hardship for low-income Londoners. I also asked that she work with me to reassess how the benefit cap, Local Housing Allowances and Discretionary Housing Payment budgets for London are set and distributed.

Page 145 Pride Question No: 2018/1850 Fiona Twycross Are you concerned that a London school had to hold a Pride celebration in private due to protests from parents? What actions are you taking, or will you take, to make sure children of LGBT families feel included?

The Mayor

Ensuring that the LGBT+ community feels truly valued, happy and safe is a key priority, and part of that is ensuring children of LGBT+ families in London feel included. Childhood experiences, particularly those relating to early learning, set the course of every Londoner's life, and tackling emerging inequalities early on is vital.

I have just published 'Inclusive London', my equality, diversity and inclusion strategy for London to help address these problems, to create a fairer and more inclusive city where all people feel welcome and able to fulfil their potential.

I welcome the Government's commitment to a LGBT-inclusive curriculum in both primary and secondary schools. This autumn I will publish a new London Curriculum citizenship resource, written by the Association for Citizenship Teaching, which will support teachers to deliver citizenship lessons around identity, including gender and sexuality.

Drinking water in London Question No: 2018/1851 Fiona Twycross How successful has the Refill scheme been in London? How are you supporting its promotion?

The Mayor

I am pleased to say that there are now some 1,900 locations in the London area signed up to the Refill scheme. We have been working with City to Sea, Thames Water and the Zoological Society of London to promote and monitor the initiative, and following my press release in March, there was a large increase in businesses joining the scheme. Transport for London have also been promoting Refill internally to their staff and, as part of their 'please carry water with you in hot weather' campaign, will shortly be including the Refill logo on customer information posters that passengers see when entering stations.

Page 146 Safety of pets Question No: 2018/1852 Fiona Twycross With London's heatwave predicted to be prolonged and repeated throughout the summer, how will you ensure Londoners are aware of the risks to pets during the heat?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

As the owner of a dog I am all too aware of the dangers the current heatwave can pose to much loved pets. Most pet owners are aware of this and ensure their pets stay cool and hydrated, and not left in cars which is particularly dangerous. I do not have responsibility for animal welfare at city hall but I commend the animal charities and the media who highlight the danger to pets caused by this hot weather.

Housing market Question No: 2018/1853 Fiona Twycross With reports suggesting that over a quarter of estate agents are facing financial distress, are you concerned a) at whether this suggests underlying issues in the housing market b) whether online services are as transparent and accountable and c) what impact any closure of estate agencies could have on London's high streets?

The Mayor

Within London, according to UK Finance data, transaction levels have been subdued for a number of years, particularly among home movers. This, combined with the entrance of online agents into the sector, has put pressure on existing estate agents.

All estate agents, including online agents, are subject to the Estate Agency Act 1979, and required to be members of a government- approved independent consumer redress scheme. I am aware consumer redress for all types of housing is not working as well as it should, and I have made the case to Government in support of new single housing ombudsman to provide better access to redress for all housing consumers.

My officers have not assessed the impact of closure of estates agencies on London's high streets.

Page 147 High-speed rail connections to Europe Question No: 2018/1854 Fiona Twycross Are you concerned that Germany's state rail operator has shelved plans for international high- speed services between London, Cologne and Frankfurt due to "changes in the economic environment"? How can we ensure that post-Brexit, investment in infrastructure to strengthen transport links to mainland Europe are maintained and improved?

The Mayor

Any post-Brexit investment in transport links to mainland Europe will depend on the trading relationship we hold with the EU, and on the continued international competitiveness of our key industries.

That is why I have written to the Prime Minister (13 July 2018), stating my concern that the Government's White Paper ignores the central importance of our services sectors to the UK's economy. The Government is misguided in its belief that solutions for our trade in goods alone are enough to protect the economy from serious harm. The proposals outlined in the Brexit White Paper are therefore dangerous, and I have asked the Prime Minister to change course and accept that staying within the Single Market and Customs Union is the only way to protect jobs and growth across the UK.

Whilst there appear to be multiple reasons for Deutsche Bahn's decision, the UK remaining in the Single Market and Customs Union would surely improve the economic environment that might permit investment in high-speed services between London, Cologne and Frankfurt.

Buffer zones near abortion clinics Question No: 2018/1855 Fiona Twycross Now that a court ruling has upheld Ealing Council's decision on imposing a buffer zone near an abortion clinic, what action will you be taking to ensure the rights of women over their reproductive health are upheld both by the police and by other councils?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 148 Brexit and legal services Question No: 2018/1856 Andrew Dismore Reports in the legal press suggest that Paris is setting up law courts applying English Law and undercutting fees in commercial cases, as a direct challenge to London's courts, post Brexit. Have you seen these reports and what representations have you made about it?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

I have seen these reports, and to me they add to the growing sense that Paris is well positioned to benefit from Brexit, with the opportunity to become a significant finance and professional services hub. I am seeking a meeting with the new Secretary of State for Exiting the EU to raise these concerns, among others. I recently wrote to the Prime Minster, after the publication of the Government's Brexit White Paper, expressing my fears that a Brexit deal which heavily reduces the ability of our banks, insurers, legal and professional services firms to do business across Europe will clearly damage our status and hamper our growth.

A1000/A406 connecting bridge Question No: 2018/1857 Andrew Dismore Cyclists have complained about the state of the A1000 on the bridge over the A406: the poor state of the tarmac around drain covers and other iron work and the metal of the expansion strip on the bridge sits proud of tarmac road surface. This results in cyclists having to take evasive action to avoid damage to bike wheels and/or an accident. Given the volume (and at quieter periods, the speed) of traffic on this stretch, were a cyclist to come off their bike it could well be difficult for vehicles to avoid them. Will you ensure that these hazards are dealt with promptly?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The A1000, including the surface of the bridge of the A406, is the responsibility of the London Borough of Barnet who are the Highway Authority. Transport for London (TfL) is responsible for the bridge structure itself and engineers carry out regular inspections.

The safety of Londoners is my top priority and so I have asked TfL to consider if remedial works to the expansion strip are required to ensure the bridge is not a danger to cyclists.

TfL is happy to organise a site visit to discuss with you further.

Page 149 Met Detectives Question No: 2018/1858 Andrew Dismore How many detectives short of the correct establishment is the Met?

The Mayor

As I set out in my response to Mayor's Question 2018/1566 the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) is reassessing the number of roles that need full detective skills.

Under the current establishment target, as of June 2018, there were 482 Detective Constable vacancies. The establishment target is likely to change in response to the MPS assessment.

In the meantime, the MPS continues its work to recruit more detectives. This month saw the passing out of the first cohort of direct entry detectives and further cohorts will follow later in the year.

ULEZ blue badge discounts Question No: 2018/1859 Andrew Dismore Vehicles registered for the Blue Badge Congestion Charge Discount will not receive a discount from the ULEZ but will continue to receive the 100% discount from the Congestion Charge; as the Blue Badge scheme is only for disabled Londoners, why cannot the exemption from the congestion charge also extend to the ULEZ?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 150 Barking to Gospel Oak Line Question No: 2018/1860 Andrew Dismore In May, Transport for London promised users of the Barking to Gospel Oak line that there would be 5 extra peak time trains until the longer electric trains were introduced later in the summer. Now that extra service has been withdrawn; and the electric trains introduction has slipped to November: what has been going on? And is this acceptable?

The Mayor

Additional trains have been temporarily operating on the Gospel Oak to Barking route to manage congestion during the busiest times and ahead of new, longer Class710 trains being introduced in November.

Typically, Transport for London sees a drop-in demand during the summer months, but will continue to operate these services as often as it can.

As is standard practice with the introduction of any new trains, thorough testing, assurance, approvals and driver training must be carried out before the train can enter passenger service. The train manufacturer has also needed to do some further software development and testing on these high-tech trains, which has delayed their introduction to November.

The new Class710 trains will carry almost 700 people per train and feature a high capacity walk- through layout, doubling the capacity of the current diesel trains.

Page 151 Station safety Question No: 2018/1861 Andrew Dismore On Tuesday 3rd July a resident taking care of the Community Garden at East Finchley Station noticed smoke coming from the rear entrance. This seems to have been due to a smoker discarding their cigarette onto dry leaves. However, there were no station staff present at the time, and the resident put the fire out herself, using her gardening equipment. During events such as these, are stations safe with such few members of staff around? Do you have any plans to review station staffing to improve safety?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) has been investigating this incident since you brought it to their attention on 4 July 2018, and will be in touch with your office once this has concluded. I can confirm that two staff were on duty at East Finchley station on the afternoon of Tuesday 3 July.

All London Underground (LU) stations are rostered to be staffed during operating hours. Stations located underground have specific staffing requirements and minimum staff numbers, which vary depending on the size of the station. This is a fire regulation requirement arising from King's Cross fire in 1987.

While there is no regulatory or legal requirement for LU's above ground stations to remain staffed when services are operating, TfL continues to plan to staff all stations at all such times. Sometimes operational requirements may mean that some above ground stations become unstaffed temporarily, for example when an incident occurs elsewhere on the line and the assistance of another member of staff is required. During these times the gates are temporarily left open, and the station remains safe to operate. This only ever relates to above ground stations.

TfL's system of prioritisation means it is generally the quietest stations that may be left unstaffed, as staff are moved to higher priority locations. TfL's internal processes ensure that, even without staffing available, these stations remain safe to operate.

TfL will continue to monitor the level of staffing across the network to ensure that customers are kept safe and receive the best possible level of service and assistance at all times.

Page 152 Mill Hill East Question No: 2018/1862 Andrew Dismore I have previously raised the problem of Mill Hill East shuttle tube trains setting off while passengers are still disembarking at Finchley Central, to transfer; I was previously given assurances that the shuttle would wait to allow passengers to transfer, but this arrangement has started to break down meaning passengers then have a 15minute wait; will you ensure that Mill Hill trains wait for the incoming trains before setting off. Also, the 382 bus leaves at the same time as the shuttle from Mill Hill East which doesn't even make using a bus an option when going from Mill Hill East in the direction of Finchley Central and beyond: can this be letter co-ordinated so that the buses go at the mid point of the shuttle timetable?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) tries to plan the transport network to ensure customers are able to move between services as easily as possible. However, the sheer scale of the network means it is not possible for every journey to connect seamlessly.

The new signalling system on the Northern line currently has no function for alerting drivers on the Mill Hill East London Underground branch when the next train is coming into East Finchley station. A software update, planned to take place in Summer 2019, will rectify this situation. In the meantime, drivers are instructed to look at the incoming platform to see if a train is coming and, if so, to wait for those passengers who wish to transfer. I have asked TfL to remind drivers of this requirement.

The current 382 bus schedule, in place since July 2017, aims to connect with Mill Hill East branch services when frequencies are the same. This is possible during the hours between the morning peak and evening peak Monday to Fridays and during Saturday shopping hours. It is not possible during early mornings, peaks, Sundays and evenings when the Tube is operating at a higher frequency than the 382 bus route

Page 153 BBC Maida Vale Studios Question No: 2018/1863 Andrew Dismore Do you support the campaign to save BBC Maida Vale Studios, (where arguably every significant pop artist has recorded there from the Beatles to Beyoncé as well as classical music, light entertainment and the pioneering Radiophonic Workshop) so as to safeguard this important part of London's heritage, under threat from the BBC of closure and at risk of demolition and redevelopment?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 25/07/2018

I recognise the contribution that music produced at Maida Vale Studios has made to popular culture over the years.

The BBC has made the decision to relocate Maida Vale Studios and create new state-of-the-art facilities, building on the legacy at Maida Vale to bring great benefits to East London.

The BBC will join the list of other prestigious institutions – including the V&A, Sadler's Wells, the Smithsonian, UCL and London College of Fashion – and be part of East Bank, a new cultural and education district at the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. It will bring jobs, growth and new opportunities to East London and London as a whole.

The new studios will allow BBC Music to create a home fit for the 21st century, bringing new music opportunities to East London and nurturing the Beatles and Beyoncé’s of the future. The BBC will also work with local communities including choirs and ensembles and bring Proms performances to the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park.

I’m sure the BBC will be mindful of the history of the Maida Vale building in considering the future of the site.

Page 154 Barnet food waste collection Question No: 2018/1864 Andrew Dismore Barnet Council took a decision on Tuesday 5 June to scrap food waste collection which is sent for Anaerobic Digestion. Instead, residents will be instructed to throw all food waste in to the general waste collection which will be sent for incineration. Given your Environment Strategies' ambition to cut food waste by 20% per person by 2025 and 50% by 2030, do you agree that this is an environmentally retrograde step with a negative impact on the environment?

The Mayor

Comprehensive modelling for my London Environment Strategy suggests that the separate collection of food waste with onward processing for example via Anaerobic digestion is, in general, the most environmentally beneficial and least cost solution. This is supported by Defra's Guidance on Applying the Waste Hierarchy, and is a position that has been supported by a range of research from the likes of WRAP and the Renewable Energy Association (REA)

For further details, please see response to Mayor's Question 2018/1755.

Tube noise [1] Question No: 2018/1865 Andrew Dismore Transport for London (TfL) has on a number of occasions now indicated that they are not able to do more to reduce disturbing tube noise affecting residents, effectively stating that they just have to put up with the increased noise levels. When this increased noise is caused by corrugated rail, will you instruct TfL to consider replacing the affected rails until a longer-term solution can be found?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) will continue to examine all feasible means of minimising noise and limiting disruption to residents living close to the Tube.

In areas where noise cannot currently be further reduced, TfL will continue to work alongside industry and academia to further understand noise and vibration, and to trial new products and innovative solutions.

Rail corrugation can develop within months, and so replacing the affected rails would not be an effective long-term mitigation for residents.

Page 155 Tube noise [2] Question No: 2018/1866 Andrew Dismore Tube noise from the Victoria Line has been adversely affecting residents in Fitzrovia. Transport for London stopped remedial work, as they had complaints of increased noise from passengers for the stretch of track affected. Do you think it is fair to put the interests of passengers for a short period of time, above that of residents who face the noise nuisance all the time?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) is required to balance the interests of all groups affected by Tube noise, including local residents, passengers and members of staff. However, it is not the case that TfL has stopped works in this area.

Resilient track fastenings were installed in this area in January and December 2017, following a number of noise complaints. Following further complaints in a nearby area, TfL engineers will visit the site by the end of July 2018 to determine what further noise mitigation measures can be carried out. I have asked that TfL officers update you following this visit.

Page 156 Tube noise [3] Question No: 2018/1867 Andrew Dismore We are told by a Transport for London (TfL) press release that 'state-of-the-art technology' will increase the lifespan of the Elizabeth line with a rail milling train and two multi-purpose engineering trains, with delivery to London later this year. TfL says:

'The 48 metre long rail milling train is the first of its kind to be used in the UK rail industry. It is able to scan the rails using electromagnetic crack detection, looking for any defects. If it identifies any issues with the track, it can mill the surface of the rail to remove defects and cracks, reducing wear on the new Elizabeth line train wheels and the tracks'.

If this can be done for the Elizabeth Line, why cannot such a machine be purchased for the Northern Line, to reduce the noise from corrugated rails that is causing such misery to so many people living near the Northern Line: should they not have priority over a track that has not even been used yet?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) has rail grinding machines that operate on the Northern line. They manage rail defects on the line, as the milling train will on the Elizabeth line. Both rail grinding and milling remove material from the rail head to smooth the rails. These London Underground grinding machines use ultrasonic technology to measure rail cracks, which are then addressed by rail grinding.

Rail grinding and milling are not effective long-term methods for reducing noise and vibration. Both methods are predominantly used to maximise rail life and reduce the risk of rail defects.

Page 157 red routes Question No: 2018/1868 Andrew Dismore Why is Oxford Street not a red route while St John's Wood Road is?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The Transport for London Road Network (also known as "red routes") is largely based on the Primary Route Network established in the early 1990s, with a slight expansion as part of the 1999 GLA Act. This network - which comprises five per cent of London's roads - was established as the most appropriate set of strategic routes for moving traffic into and around London.

In terms of the wider road network, St Johns Wood Road provides a key link between the A5 and the A41, meaning TfL is the responsible highway authority. Oxford Street is a busy international destination but Westminster City Council is currently the responsible highway authority.

Baker St and Gloucester Place Question No: 2018/1869 Andrew Dismore With the pedestrianisation of Oxford Street now not happening, is there any point in continuing with the conversion of Baker Street and Gloucester Place into a two way street?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Yes. The Baker Street project will introduce two-way working on Baker Street and Gloucester Place to improve the public realm, walking routes, cycle routes, road safety, and directness of bus services.

The Baker Street project commenced design before the latest Oxford Street plans had begun and has its own business case, independent of whether or not Oxford Street is pedestrianised. The project also provides an opportunity to rebalance road space and traffic signal times for the benefit of pedestrians and cyclists, while maintaining appropriate levels of traffic and discouraging high vehicle speeds.

Page 158 CS11 and the Royal Parks Question No: 2018/1870 Andrew Dismore What are the issues causing objections to CS11 from the Royal Parks; and what is the best estimate for when these issues can be resolved?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Camden Town and Mornington Crescent planned engineering work Question No: 2018/1871 Andrew Dismore A constituent, living in Woodside Park and using Camden Town Station to get to and from work has raised the timetabling of works on the Northern Line. Planned engineering work on the escalator at Camden Town means the station entrance is closed in the afternoon/evening until late July. Many who would normally use the station therefore detoured to Mornington Crescent to access the Northern Line. However, planned engineering work on one of the two lifts at Mornington Crescent lasting until late June meant there was only one lift in use. The result: crowds of frustrated and weary passengers at street level unable to get into the one lift. Why could this work not have been coordinated better, so that the works on these neighbouring stations was not done at the same time?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) plans and coordinates lift closures carefully so as to minimise the impact on customers. Engineering works at Camden Town Station have been planned and will be completed by the end of July 2018. However the lift at Mornington Crescent developed an unforeseen fault and a plan is being put in place to get it back in operation. Mornington Crescent is, therefore, currently operating with just one lift.

TfL apologises for the inconvenience caused by this and is working to get the lift back into operation as quickly as possible.

Page 159 HS2 Question No: 2018/1872 Andrew Dismore As a consequence of HS2, Transport for London has introduced road restrictions and closures that have detrimentally affected traders in Drummond Street, already under pressure due to the impact on access to their businesses due to HS2 works. There is a lane running westbound in front of University College London Hospitals on the southern side of Euston Road. At present it is reserved for buses and black taxis.

There is space at the junction to allow a few cars wishing to U-turn to proceed forward into the junction and wait until the traffic coming eastbound along Euston Road and heading for Gower Street southbound has cleared the junction. Those cars could then U-turn onto Euston Road eastbound (the northern side of the carriageway) without any significant change needed in the phasing of the lights. It is highly unlikely that there would be more than one or two cars wanting to do so at each phase.

The option to do this U-turn was removed by the Euston Circus works some time ago, without any consideration of the damage that the construction of HS2 would do to access to the Drummond Street area. As an alternative, will you reinstate the right-hand turn from Hampstead Road northbound onto Drummond Street eastbound. Those lights have a very long dwell and without that right turn or the previous option, traffic coming from the east to Drummond Street will be forced to go Hampstead Road and do a loop via William Road and Stanhope Street in order to get onto Drummond Street eastbound (having already been forced to take a substantial detour via various traffic lights in order to be able to go north up Hampstead Road). Without either of these options the much-loved restaurants and shops of Drummond Street face a bleak future. Will you ask TfL to reinstate the possibility to U-turn from westbound to eastbound at Euston Circus?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 160 Reduction in Police Numbers in Hackney Question No: 2018/1873 Jennette Arnold Government cuts to police funding have meant a reduction in officers across the capital. How many officers have been lost in Hackney?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I have been consistently clear that as a result of government cuts, police officer numbers will be forced to fall in London, as they have done across the whole of England and Wales. Police spending per head has fallen faster in London than in any other police force in England and Wales.

The recorded number of officers, Full Time Equivalents (FTE), assigned to Hackney has decreased from 585 in June 2016 to 553 in June 2018.

Information on the number and diversity of officers is provided in the following dashboard www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/mayors-office-policing-and-crime-mopac/data-and- statistics/policing/workforce-dashboard#

The joining together of Hackney with Tower Hamlets into a single BCU later in 2018 means it will not be possible to differentiate officers between these boroughs. The decline in officer numbers is not a result of the move to BCUs, rather the reforms are designed to ensure a robust policing service for London in the face of these reductions.

I continue to do all that I can to protect police officer numbers, investing an unprecedented extra £110m to fund an additional 1,000 officers than would otherwise be affordable. But it is the government that controls the majority of police funding and they who must act to reverse the real terms cuts to policing.

Page 161 Reduction in Police Numbers in Islington Question No: 2018/1874 Jennette Arnold Government cuts to police funding have meant a reduction in officers across the capital. I have an upcoming panel meeting in Islington and would like to know how many officers have been lost in Islington?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I have been consistently clear that as a result of government cuts, police officer numbers will be forced to fall in London, as they have done across the whole of England and Wales. Police spending per head has fallen faster in London than in any other police force in England and Wales.

The joining together of Islington with Camden into a single BCU (Central North) in 2017 means it is not possible to differentiate officers between these boroughs.

The recorded number of officers assigned to BCU Central North has decreased from 1,225* in June 2016 to 1,138 in June 2018. The decline in officer numbers is not a result of the move to BCUs, rather the reforms are designed to ensure a robust policing service for London in the face of these reductions.

Information on the number and diversity of officers is provided in the following dashboard www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/mayors-office-policing-and-crime-mopac/data-and- statistics/policing/workforce-dashboard#

I continue to do all that I can to protect police officer numbers, investing an unprecedented extra £110m to fund an additional 1,000 officers than would otherwise be affordable. But it is the government that controls the majority of police funding and they who must act to reverse the real terms cuts to policing.

*note this figure precedes the BCU and is derived from combining Camden and Islington's individual officer complements to enable a comparison.

Page 162 Reduction in Police numbers in Waltham Forest Question No: 2018/1875 Jennette Arnold Government cuts to police funding have meant a reduction in officers across the capital. How many officers have been lost in Waltham Forest?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I have been consistently clear that as a result of government cuts, police officer numbers will be forced to fall in London, as they have done across the whole of England and Wales. Police spending per head has fallen faster in London than in any other police force in England and Wales.

The recorded number of officers, Full Time Equivalents (FTE), assigned to Waltham Forest has decreased from 563 in June 2016 to 501 in June 2018.

Information on the number and diversity of officers is provided in the following dashboard www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/mayors-office-policing-and-crime-mopac/data-and- statistics/policing/workforce-dashboard#

The joining together of Waltham Forest with Newham into a single BCU later in 2018 means it will not be possible to differentiate officers between these boroughs. The decline in officer numbers is not a result of the move to BCUs, rather the reforms are designed to ensure a robust policing service for London in the face of these reductions.

I continue to do all that I can to protect police officer numbers, investing an unprecedented extra £110m to fund an additional 1,000 officers than would otherwise be affordable. But it is the government that controls the majority of police funding and they who must act to reverse the real terms cuts to policing.

Page 163 On-platform signage to the lifts at Blackhorse Road Station. Question No: 2018/1876 Jennette Arnold Transport for London (TfL) has still not installed on-platform signage to the lifts at Blackhorse Road Station, months after they started operating. As a result, people struggle up the stairs with buggies, luggage etc, because they don't realise there are lifts further along the platform. Questions and chasers to TfL about this have so far produced vague promises but no action - not even temporary signs. Does the Mayor share the despair of so many of my constituents who are regular users of this station, and what will the Mayor do about it?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Unfortunately, the National Rail project to regenerate Blackhorse Road station overlooked the need to provide signage to the lift when it was first installed. Transport for London (TfL) is in the process of specifying the signage requirements and expects installation to be complete over the next few months.

In the interim, TfL has provided temporary directional signage to raise the awareness of the lift location.

Improved Platforms, Stairs, Access & Exit Routes at Blackhorse Road Station. Question No: 2018/1877 Jennette Arnold The extensive regeneration and building programme around Blackhorse Lane is bound to put increasing pressure on Blackhorse Road station, where the Overground platforms and the steps leading to them are very narrow and in need of widening, leading even now to congestion especially at peak times. What measures are planned by Transport for London to address this?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Blackhorse Road London Overground station has recently received investment through an accessibility improvement scheme which does assist in relieving congestion. The station was made step free earlier this year with the installation of lifts.

In addition, new, longer London Overground trains will come on to the Gospel Oak to Barking line later this year, which will reduce platform crowding and provide more comfortable journeys.

While there are currently no plans for further improvements at Blackhorse Road station, Transport for London will continue to keep the station under review.

Page 164 New trains on Barking - Gospel Oak Line Question No: 2018/1878 Jennette Arnold Will the Mayor confirm whether new trains will be available for passenger service on the Barking - Gospel Oak by November 2018, given that the existing diesel fleet is being moved to enhance services in the West Midlands?

The Mayor

Please see my answer to Mayor's Question 2018/1713.

Bottle Feeding Question No: 2018/1880 Leonie Cooper A constituent wants to know what arrangements are in place to ensure bottle-feeding parents have sufficient water when water supplies fail, as they did in many areas of London earlier this year?

The Mayor

Water companies are required to provide bottled water if supplies fail. However, as we saw during recent supply outages earlier this year, bottled water did not reach all those Londoners that needed it. There were problems with logistics and poor distribution.

I have no powers to direct water companies, but I have written to the water companies in London and Ofwat following this incident to ask them to do more to ensure all customers, particularly vulnerable customers and those least able to access distribution points, receive bottled water when supplies fail. I am pleased Ofwat have responded, making strong recommendations to require water companies to improve support for vulnerable customers during incidents.

I have asked water companies to work with local authorities and other utility companies to improve distribution logistics and their approach to identifying vulnerable customers, including those with infants. Good examples, such as Lambeth Council who supported vulnerable residents during the outages by ensuring bottled water reached sheltered housing schemes, could be more widely followed. Water companies are now updating their lists of priority customers who require water delivered to their homes. My officers will be meeting with the water companies over the summer to ensure this has happened.

Page 165 London Living Wage (1) Question No: 2018/1881 Leonie Cooper How many London Boroughs are now publicly committed to paying the London Living Wage to all their directly employed staff?

The Mayor

There are currently 16 London Living Wage accredited boroughs in London.

Wimbledon Police Station (1) Question No: 2018/1883 Leonie Cooper Could you please update me on the latest position with the regard to the Judicial Review of the decision to close Wimbledon Police Station?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Wimbledon Police Station (2) Question No: 2018/1884 Leonie Cooper A constituent wants to know how many people came into Wimbledon Police Station each week, from 1st January - 30th June 2018. Please provide me with this information.

The Mayor

This information is not available.

A footfall survey was conducted prior to the publication of the Draft Public Access and Engagement Strategy. This showed that an average of 2.6 crimes were reported at Wimbledon each day.

Page 166 Healthcare Devolution Question No: 2018/1885 Leonie Cooper Could you please outline what learning has been achieved during the recent health care devolution pilot, trialling work between 5 Boroughs?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The role of the five 'pilot' areas was to explore how devolution of specific decisions, powers and resources could support delivery of better health and care for Londoners. Their work focussed on health and care integration, estates, workforce and prevention.

These pilots included single boroughs (Haringey and Lewisham), collaborations across City and Hackney, and Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Red bridge, and a five boroughs collaboration across the NCL Sustainability and Transformation Partnership.

The learning from these pilots informed the content of the London Health and Care Devolution Memorandum of Understanding, signed in November last year. This document contains commitments to devolution which we are now working to make a reality. For example, London will be given the ability to take more decisions around capital investment, through the London Estates Board.

Carbon Offset Fund (1) Question No: 2018/1886 Leonie Cooper How many London Boroughs now have set up Carbon offset funds?

The Mayor

As of today, there are 28 London boroughs with carbon offset funds. My officers are continuing to work closely with the remaining boroughs to ensure funds are set up as soon as possible.

Page 167 Carbon Offset Fund (2) Question No: 2018/1887 Leonie Cooper How much Carbon offset funding has been collected, by Borough?

The Mayor

London boroughs reported in July 2017 that over £9m of carbon offset funding had been collected, and an additional £20m had been secured and was awaiting collection through the planning process. We are undertaking more detailed monitoring which will be available later in the year. This will include a breakdown by borough.

Aquatic Life Protection Question No: 2018/1888 Leonie Cooper Recently, all the swans were removed from King George's Park in Putney, due to water quality issues. Noting your responsibilities in relation to protecting London’s Waterways and section 7 of the London Plan, what arrangements are in place to ensure London's aquatic wildlife is protected during spells of hot weather?

The Mayor

Management of individual water-bodies (and aquatic wildlife) is the responsibility of the land- owners and is regulated primarily by the Environment Agency, so is not within my responsibilities.

However, I want to do what I can within my powers to improve water quality in London. To ensure the quality of surface water run-off, which can pollute waterways, is improved I have included a policy on improving water quality in my London Environment Strategy and I have updated London Plan policy with an aim to increase sustainable drainage (SuDS). I am also part-funding a project on identifying road run-off pollution hotspots, to tackle the worst cases and my Water Advisory Group is looking at solutions to the causes of poor water quality, such as tackling misconnected plumbing.

The London Environment Strategy and London Plan also contain policies on water efficiency and water demand management to help reduce the amount of water abstracted from watercourses.

In combination, these policies will contribute to improving the amount and quality of water in rivers and water-bodies, especially during periods of prolonged dry weather and drought.

Page 168 Heathrow Expansion Question No: 2018/1889 Leonie Cooper Could you update me on what steps have been taken in the campaign to prevent further expansion at Heathrow airport, including meetings with the Councils opposing expansion, such as Wandsworth?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Corrosive substances (2) Question No: 2018/1898 Unmesh Desai How will Met officers be supported to implement changes to the law which make it an offence to carry a corrosive substance in public (for example, how will stop and search be conducted on items suspected to be corrosive substances)?

The Mayor

I take these attacks very seriously and have ensured a robust policing response. The Met is a key member of the national corrosive crime action group, led by the NPCC and Home Office, that is planning the implementation of the changes proposed by the Weapons Bill. This includes frontline Met officers working with government agencies to identify technological options that offer safe solutions for evidential testing on or off street. Once the new offences are passed by parliament, all Met officers will receive the training and equipment they need to tackle these crimes further through effective application of those laws.

President Trump visit and policing arrangements Question No: 2018/1899 Unmesh Desai Will the Met be receiving any outside assistance from other police forces in England and Wales for the visit of President Trump and if so how many officers from police forces outside of the Metropolitan Police Service will be assisting the policing operation?

The Mayor

The MPS requested 29 SEG (VIP Motorcycle Escort) officers from 12 forces. They were deployed between 12-14th July inclusive and were provided with overnight accommodation during this time

Page 169 President Trump visit and policing arrangements (2) Question No: 2018/1900 Unmesh Desai Will any Metropolitan Police Officers be abstracted to support the policing operation in other parts of the United Kingdom during the visit of President Trump (for example to support the efforts of Police Scotland)? If so, how many officers will be abstracted and what are the arrangements for such visits (e.g. does the Metropolitan Police Service reclaim officer costs)?

The Mayor

Other than a small number of specialist firearms officers being sent to support Police Scotland, the MPS did not provide any officers to forces nationally in support of the presidential visit.

Policing Wimbledon Question No: 2018/1901 Unmesh Desai What was the total cost of policing Wimbledon in 2018?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Rotherhithe - Canary Wharf crossing (1) Question No: 2018/1913 Tom Copley I fully support your manifesto commitment to deliver a crossing between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf. A number of logistical issues have been raised with me regarding placing a bridge in that location. Will Transport for London give full consideration to placing the crossing in a tunnel instead?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London has carried out a number of assessments to explore a variety of crossing options, including a tunnel. This was reported as part of a recent public consultation and further information can be found at: https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/rivercrossings/rotherhithe-canarywharf/

There is a specific factsheet on options assessment, including a summary of our consideration to placing the crossing in a tunnel: https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/rivercrossings/rotherhithe- canarywharf/user_uploads/r2cw---factsheet-2---crossing-options.pdf

Page 170 Rotherhithe - Canary Wharf crossing (2) Question No: 2018/1914 Tom Copley What assessment has Transport for London made of the disadvantages of an opening bridge, which would have to be closed to pedestrians and cyclists while it is open, vs a tunnel between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

As described in the response to Mayor's Question 2018/1913, Transport for London's assessment of different crossing options was reported as part of the recent consultation. This explained that, while users of a tunnel would not be affected by river vessels, this would be a more expensive option than a bridge and could also have significant environmental impacts on the river. Further information is provided in the consultation materials.

Rotherhithe - Canary Wharf crossing (3) Question No: 2018/1915 Tom Copley A study by Knight's found that a bascule bridge between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf would require ramps of 700-800m on either side of the river. Is this Transport for London's view, and if so is there enough vacant land to build on?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

If ramps are to be provided, their scale and extent would depend upon a number of factors including the bridge height, proposed gradient and availability of suitable land. As set out in the recent public consultation, Transport for London's (TfL's) initial studies indicate that there are feasible landing locations. A summary of potential locations was presented.

TfL believes the ramps could be significantly shorter than suggested, but is currently in the process of reviewing different options to determine the most appropriate solution. This will take into consideration the views of the public and stakeholders from the consultation, as well as factors such as the technical feasibility, environmental impacts and value for money.

Page 171 Rotherhithe - Canary Wharf crossing (4) Question No: 2018/1916 Tom Copley Has an assessment been made by Transport for London (TfL) comparing the capital cost of an opening bridge vs a tunnel between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf and if not will TfL conduct one?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Yes. An assessment comparing the capital cost of an opening bridge versus a tunnel was presented as part of Transport for London's recent consultation. Further information can be found in the Background to Consultation Report, published here: https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/rivercrossings/rotherhithe-canarywharf/user_uploads/r2cw-- -background-to-consultation-report.pdf.

Rotherhithe - Canary Wharf crossing (5) Question No: 2018/1917 Tom Copley Has an assessment been made by Transport for London (TfL) comparing the ongoing maintenance cost of an opening bridge vs a tunnel between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf and if not will TfL conduct one?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Yes. An assessment comparing the ongoing maintenance cost of an opening bridge vs a tunnel was presented as part of TfL's recent consultation. Further information can be found in the Background to Consultation Report, published here: https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/rivercrossings/rotherhithe-canarywharf/user_uploads/r2cw-- -background-to-consultation-report.pdf.

Page 172 Updated CONTEST strategy (1) Question No: 2018/1920 Unmesh Desai What will the Government's updated CONTEST strategy mean for counter-terrorism in London?

The Mayor

Terrorist attacks are changing, with people increasingly being radicalised via the internet and using everyday objects as weapons. The time gap between radicalisation and attack has also grown shorter.

The updated CONTEST strategy looks to tackle this evolving threat utilising the existing framework of the four P's (Prevent, Pursue, Protect and Prepare). In practical terms, this will mean London piloting new ways of working, such as the Multi-Agency Centre collaboration between the security services and local government partners, increased cooperation with the private sector, and a continuing effort to engage technology companies to rid their platforms of extremist material.

Updated CONTEST strategy (2) Question No: 2018/1921 Unmesh Desai What input did you, the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, and the Metropolitan Police Service have in developing the updated CONTEST strategy?

The Mayor

The Home Office does not consult publicly on the CONTEST strategy, therefore there was no direct input into developing it. The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime does, however, chair the London CONTEST Board which is attended at director level by the Home Office. Through this mechanism there are regular discussions on a wide range of counter terrorism policies and initiatives which affect London, and these are fed back to both the Home Office and myself through the London Crime Reduction Board.

Page 173 Updated CONTEST strategy (3) Question No: 2018/1922 Unmesh Desai The Government's updated CONTEST strategy commits to take forward a number of recommendations from MI5 and Counter Terror Policing's 'Operational Improvement Review' which was conducted after the Manchester and London terrorist attacks in 2017. This should improve our response to counter-terrorism and I welcome this. What indications have you had that the Home Office will also implement the findings of the Harris Review, some of which remain outstanding?

The Mayor

Last October, following the One Year On progress report on the Lord Harris Review, the Deputy Mayor wrote to former Home Secretary Amber Rudd MP setting out the recommendations which were outstanding with the Home Office.

More of these recommendations will be updated and resolved in due course, but there are still some sat with the Home Office which remain outstanding. This crucially will include fully funding the National and International Capital Cities Grant. By only partially compensating the Metropolitan Police for this, London Council Tax payers end up paying an extra £61 a year to subsidise national work.

Page 174 Online Hate Crime Hub (1) Question No: 2018/1923 Unmesh Desai Thank you for delivering a London Online Hate Crime Hub. Could the Mayor kindly provide an update on progress based on the four elements of the Hub Programme:

1- Filtering and identification of online hate crimes

2- Training of police and VCSE organisations

3- Developing the intelligence base

4- and building community resilience

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

In my Police and Crime Plan I committed to take a zero-tolerance approach to hate in all its forms. The delivery of the Online Hate Crime Hub ensures that the police are able to respond to online hate as effectively as offline hate.

Throughout its pilot the Hub developed a proactive system to investigate online hate. This new system was successful and 711 cases from across London have been identified.

Hub officers also continue to work with community partners to build capacity in that sector. Stop Hate UK enjoyed joint training with officers in flagging online hate to Google, Facebook and Twitter. They are now recognised as 'trusted reporters', giving them priority status when reporting content. This is important for individuals and communities that are affected and victimised by harmful narratives. This understanding of the victim's experience is what led the Hub and partners to develop a referral system for victims to access services.

The Hub continues to work with community partners and others to share good practice, and most importantly to counter online hate and build community resilience nationally.

Online Hate Crime Hub (2) Question No: 2018/1924 Unmesh Desai How many referrals of online crimes have been investigated in London, can you provide a breakdown of the type of hate crime, and how many successful prosecutions have there been to date?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 175 Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

In my Police and Crime Plan I committed to take a zero-tolerance approach to hate in all its forms. The delivery of the Online Hate Crime Hub ensures that the police are able to respond to online hate as effectively as for offline hate.

During the pilot the Hub dealt with 711 cases of online hate across London (an average 65 a month). This improved expertise and timeliness of investigations. Of these, 9 cases gained a charge and 5 achieved a prosecution. The Hub is the first of its kind and the learnings and best practices are constantly being developed.

As part of its innovation, the Hub offers victims of Hate Crime access to services - 340 victims (48%) took up the offer for referral to specialist support. This is testament to the need to better support victims, which the Hub identified and delivered. VCSE's also support victims by delivering counter-narratives to build community resilience and reporting harmful content to be taken down.

The table below shows the breakdown of the different types of hate that were recorded.

Hate Type No. of reports % Disability 31 4% Gender 12 2% Racial 338 48% Racial & Religious 110 15% Religious 84 12% Sexual Orientation 84 12% Intersectional 31 4% Not Recorded 21 3% NB: For 168 cases that were noted to have a religious element, these were described specifically as either Anti-Semitic (34%) or anti-Muslim (66%) hatred.

NB: 'Racial & Religious' incidences are when both racial and religious hate has occurred in one incident. Intersectionality can be defined as "overlapping and interrelated identities" that are closely linked to oppression. For example, an individual can be a black, disabled woman (race, disability, gender).

Page 176 Online Hate Crime Hub (3) Question No: 2018/1925 Unmesh Desai Does the London Online Hate Crime Hub programme have any ambitions to deliver community resilience workshops in schools?

The Mayor

In my Police and Crime Plan I committed to take a zero-tolerance approach to hate in all its forms and I recognise the importance of education in ensuring that we all have the resilience to do so. The Hub is focussed on operational delivery. However, as part of the legacy of the project, our community partner, Stop Hate UK, has been developing an educational resource that will support schools and those working with young people in building the awareness, understanding and resilience to use social media safely. In addition, my Office for Policing and Crime continue to work with the Metropolitan Police Service, drawing knowledge from the Hub to develop and deliver a broader range of services aiming to encourage people to report hate crimes and connecting them to appropriate support services in a timely manner.

Online Hate Crime Hub (4) Question No: 2018/1926 Unmesh Desai Will the Mayor of London lobby Central Government to further invest in this Online Hate Crime Hub?

The Mayor

Government cuts to policing continue to provide challenges for our work across policing and crime. I make no apologies for relentlessly pushing the Government to understand that these cuts have had consequences across a broad range of issues. Fortunately, the Online Hate Crime Hub pilot has demonstrated its value and we have been able to achieve further efficiencies in the ways of working. The overall investment has therefore been reduced with no detriment to the level of service offered to victims.

The innovation and the hard work of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and the project team in my Office for Policing and Crime, has also inspired a national-level Online Hub run by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. We have, of course, worked with them to share learning and best practice to ensure the national-level Hub is of sound design and delivery.

Page 177 Corrosive substances (1) Question No: 2018/1927 Unmesh Desai Please could you provide a breakdown of 'acid attack offences' identified on MOAPC's Weapons-Enabled Crime Dashboard from June 2017-May 2018 by type of offence (e.g. criminal damage and etc.)?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Appendix 2018/1927 attached includes a monthly breakdown of 'acid attack offences' by offence type as requested. It is important that the notes page is read and understood in order to be clear on how these offences have been identified.

The headline figures show that during the requested period 77.3% of 'acid attack offences' were categorised as violence against the person, 19.4% robbery and 3.3% burglary.

Corrosive substances (2) Question No: 2018/1928 Unmesh Desai In December 2017 you informed me that the trial in East London of acid testing kits had not been as successful as hoped.1 Can you provide me with the reasons why the pilot was not successful - were the encountered problems due to equipment and the testing of substances or due to the existing legislation and the ability of the police to confiscate substances?

1 http://questions.london.gov.uk/QuestionSearch/searchclient/questions/question_297158

The Mayor

The Met's pilot in East London has now concluded. Utilising litmus paper based tests did not bring additional evidential value, with items seized still requiring forensic laboratory analysis. Whilst officers do have existing powers to seize items that are Offensive Weapons, it was the challenge of immediate and legitimate testing that stopped the trial. Current plans to introduce new offences and equipment should make a real difference to the Met's capability to prosecute those carrying substances for unlawful reasons.

Page 178 TfL use of glyphosate (1) Question No: 2018/1938 Leonie Cooper The Mayor's Environment Strategy commits the GLA Group to reduce 'the use of pesticides and peat-based products, such as compost'.1 What quantity of glyphosate is used on the Transport for London road network per year? Please provide figures back to 2010 in an Excel table.

1 P424

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) has confirmed its contactors do use glyphosate on the TfL Road Network.

Unfortunately, TfL's road contractors do not readily record this information. TfL has requested that each of its contractors provide litres purchased for last financial year and will provide this to you as soon as possible.

TfL use of glyphosate (3) Question No: 2018/1939 Leonie Cooper What proportion of glyphosate used on the Transport for London road network is general versus selective application? Please provide figures back to 2010 in an Excel table.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Please see my response to Mayor's Question 2018/1938.

Page 179 TfL use of glyphosate (4) Question No: 2018/1940 Leonie Cooper How much does application of glyphosate on the Transport for London road network cost for procurement and staff time for application? Please provide figures back to 2010 in a table.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Please see my response to Mayor's Question 2018/1938.

TfL use of glyphosate (5) Question No: 2018/1941 Leonie Cooper How often is glyphosate applied across the Transport for London road network? Please provide figures back to 2010 in an Excel table.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Please see my response to Mayor's Question 2018/1938.

Page 180 TfL use of glyphosate (6) Question No: 2018/1942 Leonie Cooper What quantity of glyphosate is used on the Transport for London tube and rail network per year? Please provide figures back to 2010 in an Excel table.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The figures below set out the approximate figures for the quantity of glyphosate used on Transport for London's (TfL's) Tube and rail network:

2010 - 1,527 (litres)

2011 - 1,626

2012 - 1,545

2013 - 1,536

2014 - 1,815

2015 - 1,760

2016 - 1,737

2017 - 1,868

Due to a change in contractor, data on the use of glyphosate for the Docklands Light Railway has been included from 2015 onwards. TfL Rail started operating in 2015. Due to a change in contractor, data on the use of glyphosate on the TfL Rail network has been included for 2017 only. This partly accounts for the increased use since 2010.

Use of glyphosate also varies from year to year depending on the rate of plant growth which relates to annual variations in rainfall and sunlight.

Page 181 TfL use of glyphosate (7) Question No: 2018/1943 Leonie Cooper What proportion of glyphosate applied on the Transport for London tube and rail network is general versus selective application? Please provide figures back to 2010 in an Excel table.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

2010 - 18 per cent selective, 82 per cent general

2011 - 23 per cent selective, 77 per cent general

2012 - 19 per cent selective, 81 per cent general

2013 - 18 per cent selective, 82 per cent general

2014 - 31 per cent selective, 69 per cent general

2015 - 29 per cent selective, 71 per cent general

2016 - 28 per cent selective, 72 per cent general

2017 - 36 per cent selective, 64 per cent general

Due to a change in contractor, data on the use of glyphosate for the Docklands Light Railway has been included from 2015 onwards. Transport for London (TfL) Rail started operating in 2015. Due to a change in contractor, data on the use of glyphosate on the TfL Rail network has been included for 2017 only.

Page 182 TfL use of glyphosate (8) Question No: 2018/1944 Leonie Cooper How much does application of glyphosate on the TfL tube and rail network cost for procurement and staff time for application? Please provide figures back to 2010 in an Excel table.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The application of glyphosate is often carried out by Transport for London (TfL) at the same time as other vegetation maintenance duties, and it is not possible to give an accurate estimate for the cost of staff time for its application.

The figures below set out the approximate cost for the purchase of glyphosate by TfL:

2010 - £8,809

2011 - £9,700

2012 - £8,971

2013 - £8,890

2014 - £11,401

2015 - £10,933

2016 - £10,712

2017 - £12,714

Due to a change in contractor, data on the use of glyphosate for the Docklands Light Railway has been included from 2015 onwards. TfL Rail started operating in 2015. Due to a change in contractor, data on the use of glyphosate on the TfL Rail network has been included for 2017 only. This partly accounts for the increase since 2010, in addition to the annual variation in the rate of plant growth.

Page 183 TfL use of glyphosate (9) Question No: 2018/1945 Leonie Cooper How often is glyphosate applied across the Transport for London tube and rail network? Please provide figures back to 2010 in an Excel table.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) does not keep a record of each time glyphosate is applied.

Please refer to my responses to Mayor's Question 2018/1938, Mayor's Question 2018/1942, Mayor's Question 2018/1943 and Mayor's Question 2018/1944 regarding the quantities and costs of glyphosate use.

TfL use of glyphosate (10) Question No: 2018/1946 Leonie Cooper What action is being taken by Transport for London to reduce their use of glyphosate and lead by example on sustainable pest management?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

To meet my London Environment Strategy commitment to reduce the use of pesticides by the GLA Group, Transport for London will map out a pathway for reduced use in consultation with its contractors.

Transport for London (TfL) uses glyphosate as part of its essential vegetation management programme, particularly along tracksides where there is a requirement to keep a weed-free buffer for safety reasons.

Glyphosate is currently licenced for use by the European Commission; but in light of concerns about the health impacts of glyphosate, TfL is working with its suppliers, contractors to explore if safer and effective alternatives are available. TfL also applies best practice to ensure use is minimal and targeted.

Page 184 TfL Board Report on Human Error Question No: 2018/1966 Keith Prince In your response to my Question 2018/1358, you mention that "at the request of its board, TfL is preparing a report setting out the circumstances of the 'human error'. Will you provide me with a copy of this report?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

A copy of the briefing note will be published on the Transport for London website, once it has been provided to Board Members.

Refusal to formally request Rail Accident Investigation Branch and SNC- Lavalin to re-issue their reports Question No: 2018/1967 Keith Prince In his formal 20 June response to a formal request from a blogger, the Chief Investigator of the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) has confirmed RAIB's intention to issue an update to its final report which will include "reference to IA 17 780 and its key findings". Given that the RAIB has agreed to amend its report to include IA 17 780's key findings and to ensure all lessons from the Croydon Crash are learned and made public, will you reconsider your refusal to formally request SNC Lavalin to amend its report as RAIB has agreed to do?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The recommendations from the RAIB report, the SNC Lavalin report and the Internal Audit Report 17 780 have all been accepted so it is not necessary for SNC-Lavalin to amend its report to include IA 17 780's key findings.

The actions arising from all the reports are, and will continue to be, tracked to completion. The RAIB has yet to re-issue its report, but it will of course be reviewed and any further recommendations adopted.

Page 185 Failure by Transport for London to provide Croydon Tram Fatigue Risk Management Investigation to British Transport Police Question No: 2018/1968 Keith Prince As you know, a First Group Tram Driver is being investigated for manslaughter by the British Transport Police for the 9 November 2016 crash. Do you think Transport for London's (TfL) failure to provide Internal Audit IA 17 780 - which reveals, inter alia, that

1. Tram Operations Limited's (TOL) Fatigue Risk Management System Guidance does not clearly detail the roles and responsibilities for those employees involved in managing fatigue;

2. TOL has no formal process for determining when fatigue risk analysis should be carried out;

3. TOL's fatigue risk awareness training does not include "Personal assessment of fatigue risk" or "training for Control room staff in recognising fatigue in drivers when booking on."

- from when it was issued on 15 September 2017 to when TfL sent it (12 February 2018) constitutes a manifest failure of disclosure of key evidence by TfL which might threaten both the objectivity and integrity of BTP's investigation?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Please see my response to Mayor's Question 2018/1358.

Page 186 Questions Raised by Mayor's Response to MQT about IA 17 780 and 23 May Transport for London Board meeting Question No: 2018/1969 Keith Prince Your response to Question 2018/1358 only raises more questions than answers. a) You allege that Transport for London (TfL) only "discovered" it had not sent IA 17 780 to the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, SNC-Lavalin, Office of Rail and Road, British Transport Police and the Coroner after the question was raised at the 22 January SSHR Meeting. A review of the 22 January 2018 meeting minutes does not capture the event you cite, so please provide me with all documentary evidence TfL might possess to confirm your statement. b) Seeing that over 3 working weeks transpired between 22 January and 12 February (when you indicate IA 17 780 was disclosed), what explains the three-week gap before meaningful action was taken? c) At the 23 May TfL Board Meeting, the Chair of the Safety, Sustainability and Human Resources (SSHR) Panel states that he asked TfL Bosses 3 times whether or not they had disclosed the document. Will you clarify with the SSHR Chair the exact dates to which he's referring and if 22 January 2018 is indeed one of them, and provide me with an update?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 187 Bus KSI Risk for Cyclists and Pedestrians Question No: 2018/1970 Keith Prince A chart on page 10 of a recent Transport for London report entitled "Improving Cycling Safety in London" (http://content.tfl.gov.uk/sshrp-20180620-part-1-item-10-improving-cyclist- safety-in-london.pdf) shows that Bus and Coaches, based on 2014-2016 data and corrected for their share in traffic, have the highest KSI risk for Cyclists of any other vehicle mode in London, including taxis and HGVs. Furthermore, a bullet point on page 7 of a presentation TfL gave to the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety in June 2016 (http://www.pacts.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/PACTS-Conference-Lilli-Matson- June-2016-FINALv1.pdf) states "Buses are four times more likely to be involved in a KSI collision with a pedestrian than would be expected for their share of traffic." Based on these two TfL-originated facts, would I be wrong to conclude that, compared to all other modes of surface transport and corrected for their presence in traffic, that Buses and Coaches hold the highest KSI risk for both Cyclists and Pedestrians?

The Mayor

Buses and coaches are disproportionately involved in collisions resulting in cyclists and pedestrians being killed or seriously injured, given their share of traffic. However, it is not true to say that they hold the highest risk, as the involvement of motorcyclists in collisions resulting in pedestrian deaths and serious injuries, given their share of traffic, is higher.

The disproportionate involvement of buses and coaches in pedestrian and cyclist injury is of real concern and Transport for London (TfL) has a comprehensive programme to improve the safety of those vehicles that pose the highest risk to cyclists and pedestrians, including buses and coaches. TfL is implementing the world-leading Bus Safety Programme, including the Bus Safety Standard aimed at improving safety through vehicle design and innovation, such as speed limiting technology known as Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA). The bus safety programme also includes improvements to existing safety processes and data collection.

Car Clubs Question No: 2018/1971 Keith Prince Proposal 17 of the Mayor's Transport Strategy states, "The Mayor, through TfL and the boroughs, will support the provision of car clubs for residents when paired with a reduction in the availability of private parking, to enable more Londoners to give up their cars while allowing for infrequent car travel in inner and outer London". What specific actions is the Mayor taking now to enable expansion of car clubs, in particular A to B models, to more Londoners?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 188 Car Clubs (2) Question No: 2018/1972 Keith Prince Car clubs are increasing Londoners' familiarity with electric vehicles and charging infrastructure, they will be an important part of raising Londoners awareness of both. Why has the Mayor not included any representation for car clubs on his Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Taskforce?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I am pleased to see more car clubs investing in electric vehicles. This enables Londoners who give up car ownership to still make essential car journeys in the cleanest vehicles possible.

Although not on the Taskforce itself, car clubs are already being considered as part of my Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Taskforce workshops. Car club operators have been invited to contribute to those workshops and inform discussions so will be represented through these. In addition, Transport for London maintains a regular dialogue with car club operators to understand the issues they face and their potential contribution to the delivery of my Transport Strategy.

A proportion of London's Go Ultra Low City Scheme funding is also being used to provide charging infrastructure for car clubs.

Page 189 Uber's Licence Question No: 2018/1973 Keith Prince After the granting of a 15 month licence, will Uber London Limited be required to conform to Transport for London's new operator licensing criteria which requires operators to demonstrate the overall booking process for all booking channels including apps is compliant with the Private Hire Vehicles act?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) has not changed its criteria for licensing private hire operators. It has always been the case that all licensed private hire operators must comply with the regulations and legislation that are in place including in relation to how PHV bookings are accepted.

Uber London Limited (ULL) is no exception to that.

The Chief Magistrate granted ULL a 15 month licence subject to a number of conditions. TfL will closely monitor ULL's adherence to these conditions for the duration of the licence, one of which requires ULL to give TfL at least 28 days' notice of any material changes it intends to make to its operating model. More information can be found at www.tfl.gov.uk/tph-news.

Page 190 Plying for Hire Question No: 2018/1974 Keith Prince In response to my question 2018/1017, the Mayor states, "Whether a vehicle is plying for hire either on-street or via an app depends on the individual facts". Will the Mayor give an example where a vehicle is deemed plying for hire via an app?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

As I made clear in Mayor's Question 2018/1017, as part of my Taxi and Private Hire Action Plan, TfL and I continue to lobby Government for a statutory definition of plying for hire and pre-booked services.

TfL is a member of the Department for Transport's Taxi and Private Hire Task and Finish Group which was created to review existing legislation. I understand the Chair has submitted the report to Nus Ghani MP, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department for Transport, and I look forward to reading the recommendations and hope these cover the key legislative requirements that I and TfL have been pressing Government to introduce for some time.

This will provide the clarity that is needed in this area. My Deputy Mayor for Transport recently had a productive meeting with Nus Ghani MP on this matter.

Publishing Minutes of Meeting between TfL and Taxi and PH representatives Question No: 2018/1975 Keith Prince Will the Mayor consider publishing the full minutes of all meetings between Transport for London officials and Taxi and Private Hire representatives? If not, what would be the Mayor's objection to doing so?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London does not record full minutes for these meetings. It does, however, record key summary notes, trade views and actions from each meeting in line with its taxi engagement policy. This is the same for private hire trade meetings.

Notes and actions from its quarterly taxi operational performance seminar with trade representatives can be found here: https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/taxis-and-private-hire/taxi- meetings?intcmp=48644.

Page 191 Rank Allocation at Heathrow Question No: 2018/1976 Keith Prince Is it reasonable for some taxi drivers to have to wait up to 4 or 5 hours under the queuing system at Heathrow for a terminal rank allocation?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

It is up to the drivers concerned whether they wish to queue at Heathrow for a fare. They are able to charge extra where accepting a fare from Heathrow to help cover the fee to access the rank.

Advertising Code Question No: 2018/1977 Keith Prince In the light of the controversy over Transport for London's (TfL) partnership with Hachette Partworks and given the Mayor's commitment to an advertising code for products advertised on the TfL network, will he extend that commitment to adverts for products for all TfL licenses?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) has an agreement with the TBSA Group to license its brand globally. Together TfL and TBSA Group carefully consider all new partnerships and products to ensure the integrity of the TfL brand. One of the products licensed under this agreement is a magazine subscription to build a classic Routemaster bus with Hachette Partworks Ltd.

All advertising should follow Advertising Standards Association guidelines. Hachette Partworks has confirmed that this specific advertisement has been withdrawn, and there are no plans for it to be shown again.

Page 192 Pride Parade (1) Question No: 2018/1978 Andrew Boff Why did you cap the Pride parade at 30,000 people?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

India Visit Question No: 2018/1980 Andrew Boff Please could you report back on your visit to India and the outcomes from it.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

In December 2017, I visited Mumbai, New Delhi, Amritsar in India and Lahore, Islamabad and Karachi in Pakistan over six days, attending 37 meetings/events and speaking to an estimated 2500 people across the course of the visit.

The purpose of my trade mission was to promote London as the world's number one location for investment, talent and ideas - encouraging increased trade links between London and the countries and cities I visited, strengthening connections across cultural and creative industries, and promoting the opportunities in London for tourism, students and business leaders.

During my visit, I met with senior politicians in both countries to promote London, including the Pakistani Prime Minister, Indian Finance Minister, the Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Mayor of Bengaluru, Mayor of Lahore and the Mayor of Islamabad. I also met with a range of senior business people and discussed the opportunities and challenges of doing business with the UK. This included delivering speeches to Indian business representatives at the Growth Summit and separately at WeWork in Mumbai, and meeting senior business leaders and young entrepreneurs in Islamabad and Lahore.

As part of this trade mission I took along a delegation of London's businesses. In India, I was accompanied by 18 of London's high-growth companies participating in the Mayor's International Business Programme mission to Mumbai and Bengaluru. The business delegates visited Indian companies offering opportunities for growth, met with Indian counterparts and corporations including Infosys and BDO India, and participated in pitching and networking events with local business leaders, VCs and entrepreneurs. In Pakistan, I was accompanied by a smaller delegation of senior business people who met with senior politicians and business people - decision makers that otherwise would have been difficult for them to access.

On the visit, I was pleased to announce new jobs and investment into London. This included more than 400 new jobs in London's tech sector as a result of investment from Indian firms,

Page 193 plans from ICT company Wipro to open a third office in London, and plans from Habib Bank AG Zurich to open two new branches in London creating 50 new jobs. I also announced the biggest-ever TV co-production between London and India - a remake of The Far Pavilions, worth £113 million. This unique production cemented London's position as the world-leading centre for VFX (visual effects) and post-production facilities.

London has since secured 11 new investment projects from India and Pakistan, creating 125 new jobs across the energy, ICT, food and drink, retail and finance sectors, and one of the companies on the business delegation has opened a new office in Gurgaon, India creating 100 new jobs in London to service the increased workloads.

Following my visit and that of my Deputy Mayor for Business, Rajesh Agrawal, the 2018 Grant Thornton India meets Britain Tracker has reported that London is surging ahead as the UK's leading investment destination, with more than half (53%) of all Indian companies invested in the UK choosing London. This is up from 44% in 2017, 39% in 2016, and 25% in 2015. Grant Thornton credited the increase partly to the London is Open message that myself and Rajesh promoted during our trade and business trip.

Criminalising people for possession Question No: 2018/1981 Andrew Boff Yes, or no, do you agree that criminalising people for possession of small amounts of cannabis is not a particularly good idea and does lead to great difficulties?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Silvertown (1) Question No: 2018/1983 Andrew Boff What steps and processes were followed in the procurement of Lend Lease as a development partner in Silvertown?

The Mayor

The GLA's development partner for the site is The Silvertown Partnership which was procured in 2011/12. Lendlease and Starwood acquired interests in The Silvertown Partnership as part of a corporate restructure this year. The Silvertown Partnership sought the GLA's consent to the transaction and following due diligence and a Mayoral Decision, this approval was given.

Page 194 Silvertown (2) Question No: 2018/1984 Andrew Boff Will you provide the Assembly with access to all documents relating to the procurement of Lend Lease as a partner in Silvertown?

The Mayor

Lendlease acquired interests in The Silvertown Partnership as the result of a corporate restructure. Lendlease were not involved in the original procurement of The Silvertown Partnership which was undertaken in 2011/12

Silvertown (3) Question No: 2018/1985 Andrew Boff How many companies and/or other organisations bid for the Silvertown tender that was ultimately awarded to Lend Lease?

The Mayor

No tender was awarded to Lendlease they acquired interests in The Silvertown Partnership through a corporate restructure.

Silvertown (4) Question No: 2018/1986 Andrew Boff Please provide a list of all bidders for the Silvertown tender that was ultimately awarded to Lend Lease?

The Mayor

Please see my response to Mayor's Question 2018/1985

Broadwater Farm (1) Question No: 2018/1987 Andrew Boff Has there been any application for GLA funding in relation to the redevelopment of Tangmere and Northolt blocks on the Broadwater Farm estate in Haringey?

The Mayor

The GLA has not received an application for funding related to the redevelopment of Tangmere and Northolt blocks on the Broadwater Farm estate.

Page 195 Broadwater Farm (2) Question No: 2018/1988 Andrew Boff If there is an application for GLA funding in relation to the redevelopment of Tangmere and Northolt blocks on the Broadwater Farm estate in Haringey, will you require residents to be balloted before being decanted?

The Mayor

My new funding condition makes clear that I expect resident ballots to be held before a landlord relocates estate residents in order to carry out a regeneration project.

Landlords can apply for an exemption to the ballot requirement in certain circumstances, including where demolitions are required to address concerns about the safety of residents.

If the GLA received a funding application related to Tangmere and Northolt blocks, my officers would need to establish whether it would subject to the funding condition and whether it would be exempt on the grounds of safety.

Trump balloon Question No: 2018/1989 Andrew Boff Following the decision to allow a balloon of Donald Trump to be flown over London during the President's visit to London, who was responsible for making that decision and what was the decision-making process?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Violence with Injury (VWI) Question No: 2018/1992 Keith Prince Since May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of Violence with Injury (VWI) in Waltham Forest, Havering and Redbridge, along with the ethnicity and age of the victims?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 196 Maintenance of red routes Question No: 2018/1995 Steve O'Connell Does the Mayor believe that the maintenance of red routes is happening with appropriate frequency?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Yes. Transport for London (TfL) undertakes regular inspections and repairs to maintain safety on the red routes.

Inspection frequencies, defect intervention levels and response times have all been set in accordance with industry standards and good practice, and have been benchmarked against London Boroughs and authorities outside London.

Inspection and maintenance practices are reviewed annually by TfL to assess their effectiveness, and to take account of any significant changes in asset condition or feedback from road users.

Anti-Social Behaviour report Question No: 2018/1996 Steve O'Connell We waited some time for your response to the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee's report Respecting others: tackling anti-social behaviour in London, and when it came it did not address all the recommendations specifically, for example the proposal for a London Antisocial Behaviour Board. Can you explain why and what your views are on those recommendations?'

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I am grateful for the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee's report on tackling anti- social behaviour in London.

In my response I set out the priority I have given to ASB, through setting it as a London wide priority, and encouraged others to do the same, despite overall responsibility sitting with central government and local authorities. I continue to work closely with London Councils and partners support the greater coordination of efforts to tackle ASB across London; this includes exploring with London Councils the value in re-establishing a multi-agency practitioner-led ASB forum.

Page 197 Burglaries with weapons Question No: 2018/1997 Steve O'Connell From May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of the total number of burglaries in London when a weapon was used and the sanction detection rate?

The Mayor

The attached Appendix 2018/1997 covers the requested monthly breakdown weapon related burglaries for the time specified. This data was extracted for the MPS CRIS reporting system on 13th July 2018.

This data has been extracted even though the MPS do not have an official definition or pre- built product to answer the query. Considering this fact please be sure to read the notes the table to fully understand the data set included.

World cup in Russia Question No: 2018/1998 Steve O'Connell Please can you provide the number of Metropolitan police officers and police staff who have been to Russia in relation to the world cup?

The Mayor

One Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) officer, a chief inspector attached to the UK Football Policing Unit (UKFPU), has been deployed to Russia for the World Cup.

Place of safety 1 Question No: 2018/1999 Steve O'Connell From May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of the number of times the Met police have taken someone suffering a mental health crisis to a place of safety?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Please see attached Appendix 2018/1999.

Page 198 Place of safety 2 Question No: 2018/2000 Steve O'Connell From May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of the number of times the Met police have taken someone suffering a mental health crisis to a police cell?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Since May 2016 the Met have taken 9 people to a police cell under section 136 of the Mental Health Act.

Section 136 gives the police the power to remove a person from a public place, when they appear to be suffering from a mental disorder, to a place of safety. The person will be deemed by the police to be in immediate need of care and control as their behaviour is of concern.

May 2016 2 June 2016 1 July 2016 1 May 2017 3 July 2017 1 May 2018 1

Page 199 Bleed control kits Question No: 2018/2001 Steve O'Connell In relation to the article in the Metro on 14 July, "Stabbing victim's mum wants bleed control kits introduced to stop knife deaths", have these been used in London? If so, how effective have they been and do you intend to continue or expand their use?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Bleed control kits are not routinely available in public places in London. However, NHS England (London) and the London Trauma System (LTS) are working together to make sure that the public have the right knowledge and support to offer medical treatment following a violent incident, if it is safe for them to do so.

London Ambulance Service control room staff also provide advice over the phone on wound control measures using clothing and other improvised materials.

LTS is promoting the Citizen Aid initiative which also aims to reduce the anxiety that can arise from having to make difficult decisions in stressful circumstances.

Police pursue 1 Question No: 2018/2002 Steve O'Connell From May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of the number of times the Met police pursued someone on a moped or motorbike?

The Mayor

The total number of mopeds / motorbikes pursued between May 2016 and the end of June 2018 within the MPS was 1,237. During the same period the total number of pursuits ceased due to a disproportionate danger posed by a moped or motorbike was 160 and the total number of mopeds, motorbikes discontinued and abandoned after a pursuit was authorised was 1,111.

Attached Appendix 2018/2002 shows the total number of these classifications split by month.

Page 200 Police pursue 2 Question No: 2018/2003 Steve O'Connell From May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of the number of times the Met police have ceased pursuing someone on a moped or motorbike for safety reasons?

The Mayor

The total number of mopeds / motorbikes pursued between May 2016 and the end of June 2018 within the MPS was 1,237. During the same period the total number of pursuits ceased due to a disproportionate danger posed by a moped or motorbike was 160 and the total number of mopeds, motorbikes discontinued and abandoned after a pursuit was authorised was 1,111.

Attached Appendix 2018/2003 shows the total number of these classifications split by month.

Police pursue 3 Question No: 2018/2004 Steve O'Connell From May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of the number of times the Met police were pursuing someone on a moped or motorbike and they got away?

The Mayor

The total number of mopeds / motorbikes pursued between May 2016 and the end of June 2018 within the MPS was 1,237. During the same period the total number of pursuits ceased due to a disproportionate danger posed by a moped or motorbike was 160 and the total number of mopeds, motorbikes discontinued and abandoned after a pursuit was authorised was 1,111.

Attached Appendix 2018/2004 shows the total number of these classifications split by month.

Page 201 Public houses Question No: 2018/2005 Steve O'Connell Would policy HC2 of your London Plan restrict proposals to reduce the size of an existing public house? If not, would you consider making this provision in the London Plan or associating planning guidance?

The Mayor

Policy HC7 of the draft London Plan seeks to protect the operation of public houses. As my Plan sets out, pubs are unique and intrinsic part of British culture and should be protected where they have a heritage, economic, social or cultural value to local communities, and where they contribute to wider policy objectives. However, it is also important that in serving their communities, the role of pubs can evolve; for example, some pubs have started providing library services and parcel collection points.

As well as seeking to prevent the loss of public houses, the policy also sets out that development proposals for redevelopment of associated accommodation, facilities or development within the curtilage of the public house that would compromise its operation or viability as a public house should be resisted. In many circumstances, the policy would therefore protect against attempts to reduce the size of an existing pub.

Uber Question No: 2018/2006 Susan Hall Do you welcome an inquiry by the Economy Committee looking into the economic impact of Uber in London and the potential implications of Uber losing its licence to operate?

The Mayor

The safety of Londoners is my primary concern.

Following a hearing in the Westminster Magistrates' Court, ULL has been granted a 15-month licence to operate in London. Uber are on probation, with a clear set of conditions that Transport for London will closely monitor and enforce.

I fully supported TfL's decision to refuse Uber a private hire operating licence last September, and Uber have now accepted that TfL's decision was fully justified. This decision has also been vindicated by the court.

I would welcome any scrutiny of the private hire trade by the Assembly's Economy Committee.

Page 202 Britain's high streets Question No: 2018/2007 Susan Hall It has been revealed that 50,000 retail jobs in Britain were axed in the past six months. What are you doing to assist London's high streets?

The Mayor

Please see my response to Mayor's Question 2018/1789.

Draft Health Inequalities Strategy Question No: 2018/2008 Susan Hall The draft Health Inequalities Strategy contains no mention of hepatitis C. Will you ensure that hepatitis C is addressed in the final strategy?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Responses to the Health Inequalities Strategy consultation revealed considerable support for the commitments on HIV and TB and there were several that called for action to address Hepatitis C alongside them. The HIS has chosen to focus on HIV and TB as particularly pressing health inequalities issues in London but also recognises that other infectious diseases like hepatitis C have a disproportionate impact on certain groups. The objective in the final HIS will be to support people and communities to tackle HIV, TB and other infectious diseases, and I will consider supporting any collaborative approaches to tackling Hepatitis C.

Page 203 Avoiding Financial mismanagement Question No: 2018/2009 Susan Hall How do you ensure the money spent by the Greater London Authority is spent as effectively as possible?

The Mayor

The GLA's budget is subject to a rigorous annual process that ensures resources are directed to priority areas and savings are identified. Furthermore, individual project spending proposals are then subject to a further check and approval through decision forms, which set out the case for investment and other pertinent factors. These proposals are reviewed by my Corporate Investment Board.

Delivery is managed robustly at directorate/team level, including by Deputy Mayors. In addition, portfolio and project performance is assessed by the Corporate Investment Board and also, starting shortly, a new Performance and Delivery Review Group chaired by the Chief of Staff. Transparency plays a part too; including through the quarterly reports made available to the Budget Monitoring Sub-Committee and other data published on the London Datastore.

Internal Audit plays an important role in the GLA's system of internal control, including ensuring value for money. An annual, risk-informed audit plan tests specified areas, resulting in an assurance rating and recommendations for each; the delivery of recommendations is checked through follow-up reviews. Ad hoc reviews take place where issues are identified in- year. In addition, External Audit tests and provides an annual value for money conclusion.

External organisations Question No: 2018/2010 Susan Hall How do you ensure money distributed by the Greater London Authority to external organisations is spent in the way it is intended?

The Mayor

As you would expect, we take a risk based approach and therefore the measures are tailored according to the nature of the funding, the organisations involved and what is being delivered.

Speaking generally, however, we seek to have transparent and competitive bidding processes; use grant agreements with clear milestones and payment on delivery (where appropriate); and include clauses to reclaim grant if and when necessary. We adopt good practice on requesting and checking evidence and where necessary will, from time to time, use Internal Audit to support this.

Page 204 Onsite User Research Question No: 2018/2011 Susan Hall The Mayor's Report to the Assembly, showing a list of decisions between 8 June 2018 and 5 July 2018, mentioned a contract with digital agency for onsite user research. Can you provide me further details on this? What is the job description for the researcher hired and from which agency was the researcher hired?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The proposed position is for a user researcher to work with the Digital team in External Relations. It is suggested that the researcher is associated with a user research agency so they have access to the necessary testing labs and equipment.

A core part of the way the team builds website functionality, services and applications involves understanding the users' requirements, and testing and validating assumptions with them. This ensures results are effective and easy to use.

Doing robust and regular user research is included in the Government Digital Service's standards and is point one of the Local Government Digital Service Standard.

Applications are currently open on the Government Digital Marketplace at: https://www.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/digital-outcomes-and- specialists/opportunities/7217

City Hall Staff Question No: 2018/2012 Susan Hall How many staff have been employed by the GLA, excluding the Secretariat directorate, in the last 6 years, broken down by year?

The Mayor

Please refer to Mayoral Question 2018/2017, which shows in detail the headcount/staff numbers from 2013 through to 2018 broken down by year.

Page 205 Postage 1 Question No: 2018/2013 Susan Hall From May 2016, please provide the monthly total spent by the Met police on postage?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Postage 2 Question No: 2018/2014 Susan Hall What control measures do the Met use to ensure all outgoing mail is for work purposes?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Home schooling 1 Question No: 2018/2015 Susan Hall When speaking at the APPG for Policing before he left, former AC Mark Rowley indicated that many of the of the 23,000 who are considered to pose a terror threat to the UK have opted to home school their children. Please can you provide the percentage figure?

The Mayor

The proportion of Elective Home Education by those who are considered to pose a terror threat to the UK is higher than that of a general population. However, we are unable to provide a specific figure due to data limitations across the 23,000 and classification restrictions.

Page 206 Home schooling 2 Question No: 2018/2016 Susan Hall What can you do along with partners to ensure home schooled children are safe and learning?

The Mayor

Every child in London should benefit from the best education possible, in a safe and healthy environment. I do not have direct responsibility for schools or statutory services for young people but the police work very closely with schools, PRUs and children's services across London to keep young people safe.

I support the introduction of mandatory registration and monitoring for home schooled children, and recommend that this must be accompanied by the resources necessary for local authorities to implement the changes and to support and reassure parents. My Deputy Mayor for Policing Sophie Linden has written to the Department for Education in response to the call for evidence on Elective Home Education.

Staff costs Question No: 2018/2017 Susan Hall MQ 2018/1378 details an increase in staffing costs for City Hall. Can you provide a detailed year by year breakdown of directorates and functions, excluding the Secretariat directorate, that have seen an uplift in staffing by the number of staff that have increased?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Headcount as at date below and variance between years Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Directorate r- Change r- Change r- Change r- Change r- Change r- 13 14 15 16 17 18 Development, Enterprise 133 7 140 24 164 16 180 0 180 65 245 and Environment External 64 3 67 7 74 -1 73 -2 71 0 71 Affairs Housing & 83 10 93 4 97 2 99 1 100 3 103 Land Head of Paid 129 6 135 4 139 -10 129 16 145 27 172 Service &

Page 207 Communities & Intelligence Mayor's 58 -8 50 1 51 -3 48 2 50 9 59 Office Resources 159 -9 150 14 164 11 175 1 176 -7 169 GLA 626 9 635 54 689 15 704 18 722 97 819 The table above shows both the total headcount in each Directorate as at 31st March in each year and the variance year by year. Some of the increases/decreases in headcount can be attributed to unit moves. For example: the increase in Communities and Intelligence headcount between 2016 and 2017 can be attributed to the move of the Community Engagement team from External Affairs; the increase in Development, Enterprise and Environment headcount between 2017 and 2018 can be, in part, attributed to the move of the European Programmes Management Unit from Resources. That increase in DEE's headcount is also be in part due to the future devolution of the skills budget and increased activity in this area.

Civic Innovation Challenge Pilot Question No: 2018/2018 Susan Hall Given the recent large increase in the budget for the Mayor's Civic Innovation Challenge Pilot, could you publish the cost benefit analysis of the pilot and do you think it represents value for money for the taxpayer?

The Mayor

The Civic Innovation Challenge will prevent the duplication of effort and create a cost saving by removing the administrative cost of running separate innovation programmes.

During project design, officers took advice from academics, experts in the tech sector, Innovate UK and others about mission-led innovation programmes, and the CIC has been designed in accordance with well-established best practice.

The impact of the business support and access to market on the companies involved will be assessed according to standard LEAP metrics, following the conclusion of the project and followed up over a number of years.

Page 208 ULEZ Question No: 2018/2019 Tony Devenish Would the Mayor agree to modelling being undertaken on the effect an expanded Heathrow would have on the impact of the Ultra Low Emission Zone?

The Mayor

I am taking forward a number of measures to address our toxic air pollution and improve public health, including the Ultra Low Emission Zone. I have made clear to Government that it is unacceptable for it to seek to take advantage of such measures to allow an expanded Heathrow, which I oppose, to worsen air quality at the expense of Londoners' health.

As part of our assessment of an expanded Heathrow, we have been modelling the impacts on air quality and this takes account of unrelated schemes such as the Ultra Low Emissions Zone. This modelling is ongoing and is informing our engagement in the planning process.

Council housebuilding Question No: 2018/2020 Tony Devenish In view of the Mayor’s best practice guidance on estate regeneration, does the Mayor share the Camden Housing Cabinet Member Meric Apak's view that the complex sub-contract arrangements for building work should be replaced by Councils in-house team? Does the Mayor agree with Councillor Apak that CDM contract management is "like putting the fox to guard the hen house"?

The Mayor

My Good Practice Guide to estate regeneration does not specify sub-contracting arrangements for building works.

Page 209 London housing market Question No: 2018/2021 Tony Devenish The London Real Estate Forum heard from expert speakers who worried that major developers were "pulling out of the London market". Berkeley Group, Crest Nicholson, Galliford Try, and Redrow were all listed as examples.

Does the Mayor worry that he may have contributed to this trend? What research has his housing team undertaken regarding activity levels and departures from the London market?

The Mayor

My officers regularly monitor activity in the London housing market. They have found a healthy pipeline of new housing, with 63,700 homes granted planning approval in 2017 according to Home Builders Federation data, an increase of 18% on 2016, and more than in any single year since the financial crisis in 2007-09.

However, developers of new housing in London, be it volume housebuilders, housing associations, SMEs, or councils, need certainty to invest in turning these planning permissions into new homes. Tony Pidgley, Chairman of Berkeley Group, explicitly referenced the macroeconomic uncertainty generated by Brexit in Berkeley's end of year report, and given the current disarray within the Government, this uncertainty unfortunately looks set to continue over the coming months.

Page 210 Oxford Street (1) Question No: 2018/2022 Tony Devenish Can you confirm that, in the best interests of Londoners, you remain ready to work with Westminster Council on their plans to improve Oxford Street?

The Mayor

It is Westminster City Council who have unilaterally decided to abandon two years of joint work developing a project that would have been in the best interest of Londoners by addressing the issues facing Oxford Street and the West End. This is shown by the nearly three quarters majority support in the recent consultation.

I have stated that I will not walk away from Oxford Street, but have also set out the clear challenges that any alternative scheme must address, as the original proposal would have done. Transport for London will provide technical input, but Westminster must now show that they can address those challenges.

The council has now set out its intention to bring forward some initial pedestrian safety changes, to be delivered ahead of the opening of the Elizabeth line, followed by a wider piece of work on the Oxford Street district. This timetable indicated Westminster will provide information on the safety scheme next month. Given the urgency of the opening of the Elizabeth line, I expect them to stick to this timeline and have also requested an update on the district-wide scheme by September.

Oxford Street (2) Question No: 2018/2023 Tony Devenish Can you confirm that, in the best interests of Londoners, you are prepared for Transport to London to contribute financially to Westminster Council's plans to improve Oxford Street?

The Mayor

Transport for London has contributed around £8m over the last two years of joint working, including payments to Westminster and their contractors to develop the joint project that Westminster have now unilaterally decided to abandon, completely against the best interests of Londoners.

I have asked to see details of the alternative proposals that Westminster is developing, and future decisions will be taken on the basis of any scheme's ability to support the heart of London's West End by addressing the known challenges set out in my letter of 3 July. This includes tackling road safety concerns, poor air quality, pedestrian crowding and a low quality of public realm, as the original proposal would have done.

The public would expect me to take into account the significant level of public funding already expended on the jointly agreed approach, which Westminster abandoned without any discussion.

Page 211 Oxford Street (3) Question No: 2018/2024 Tony Devenish Do you accept that an Oxford Street plan which would have meant sending hundreds more buses a day down Wigmore Street would not have been in the interests of local residents or other Londoners?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The jointly developed and endorsed scheme would have delivered enormous benefits to Oxford Street and the surrounding district, including better air quality across the district, lower traffic on many roads, including Wigmore Street, and a series of improvements for walking and cycling, including the new crossings at six junctions along Wigmore Street. This would have meant benefits for local residents.

I am aware that many local residents had concerns about the scheme, however joint work with Westminster City Council showed that concerns about traffic displacement would not have materialised.

The majority of Londoners supported the proposals in the recent consultation, which is further evidence that the project would have been in the interests of the millions of Londoners who visit the Oxford Street District for work, shopping or other reasons. Diversions to buses were relatively minimal and would have used the cleaner buses that follow from the introduction of the Ultra Low Emission Zone next year. Further changes were ready for discussion with Westminster when it took its unilateral decision to withdraw from the jointly-developed scheme.

Page 212 Review of Embankment CSH Question No: 2018/2025 Tony Devenish Business is expressing real concern that while Cycle Superhighways are to be applauded, the embankment design is leading to significant increases in congestion, poor air quality and risks to the mobility of the emergency services and a hit to business in one of the main thorough ways in central London. Will you please review the Embankment Cycle Superhighway design as a priority?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The Cycle Superhighway along Victoria Embankment has been a huge success, with over 10,000 people counted cycling at Embankment Pier daily in Autumn 2017, an increase of 38% compared to 2014 figures. The Superhighway has also brought significant benefits for people walking.

Many of London's businesses are supportive of cycling, with 85% of London's Business Improvement Districts reporting in a 2017 survey that a good environment for cycling is important for business performance. A large number of significant businesses also supported the introduction of the Superhighway when it was originally consulted with the public.

Transport for London always monitors the performance of recently constructed schemes. It will continue to do this with the East West Superhighway to ensure that it continues to operate in the best way possible for all road users, making any adjustments as necessary. For example, following close working with local businesses, final changes are nearing completion at the Byward Street/Trinity Square junction, with improvements to local access and network performance.

Tube Footfall Comparison Question No: 2018/2026 Tony Devenish Has Transport for London produced an illustration comparing footfall on the tube network with vacant or underutilised assets which could drive retail use? Can you share this to encourage businesses to approach you to replicate the success of a certain pasty shop in SW1?

The Mayor

Yes. Transport for London (TfL) uses footfall data and travel patterns to help identify and support opportunities for new retail space. This information is also used when units are on the market, to inform potential tenants of the opportunities available.

This data is published on TfL's website: https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and- reports/underground-services-performance

Page 213 HS2 Budget Overruns Question No: 2018/2027 Tony Devenish Does the Mayor agree that the report in the New Civil Engineer (June 2018) that HS2 civil works are £1.2 billion over budget is bad news for future infrastructure projects being given the green light? Is there anything Transport for London can do to support a robust cost challenge to assist colleagues at HS2 and the taxpayer?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) is already working closely with HS2 Ltd to improve efficiencies and help deliver value for the taxpayer.

TfL held a two-day cost engineering workshop with HS2 Ltd and its contractors to explore more efficient ways to deliver a new bridge over the rail lines at Hampstead Road, resulting in cost savings to one of the most complex parts of HS2 Ltd's work in London.

TfL will continue to manage the HS2 construction impacts on the TfL transport network while ensuring its benefits are unlocked for London.

Misuse of Public Highways Question No: 2018/2028 Tony Devenish What plans do you have to prevent misuse of public highways, for example from unwelcome washing of windscreens?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

Transport for London (TfL) has over 500 enforcement and compliance officers who are deployed on the street to deal with a range of issues, including wilful obstruction of the highways. These officers can be deployed to educate and engage with those causing a wilful obstruction to help increase their understanding and gain compliance. For a number of limited offences, these officers also have the power to issue fixed penalty notices. Where TfL receive reports of particular issues such as windscreen washing causing an obstruction, they will deploy officers accordingly on the TfL Road Network.

Page 214 Traffic Flow Question No: 2018/2029 Tony Devenish What steps are being taken to improve flow of traffic in London particularly for cars and commercial vehicles?

The Mayor

My Transport Strategy aims to create a city where people can travel around London easily, reliably and safely, and receive the goods and services that we all rely on. For London's growing population to make these trips, we must make more efficient use of our limited street space. This will only be achieved by tackling car dependency and enabling people to make short, unnecessary car trips by other modes - walking, cycling and public transport. To achieve the goals set out in my Transport Strategy, by 2041, there will need to be at least 3 million fewer daily car trips and one quarter of a million fewer cars owned in London.

Some trips made in vehicles are essential, such as some deliveries and servicing, or by people who cannot walk, cycle or use public transport. But many car trips could be made using more sustainable modes of transport. We are investing to make these options more attractive for those who could switch from using the car. This will tackle congestion and improve journey times and reliability for everyone, including the freight and servicing trips that support London's economy.

Transport for London (TfL) already uses traffic signals controlled by sensor technology to manage delays. TfL is also reviewing the timing of 1200 sets of traffic signals each year to ensure they are balanced appropriately for everyone using them. I am also supporting investment in new technology to provide more sophisticated tools for managing the road network in future.

TfL is also consulting on making changes to the Congestion Charge to reduce traffic and congestion as well as improve air quality in central London. The new proposals would see the exemption from the Congestion Charge for private hire vehicles (PHVs) removed and the introduction of a new Cleaner Vehicle Discount to replace the Ultra Low Emission Discount. More information on this can be found on TfL's consultation portal: tfl.gov.uk/ccyourviews

Page 215 Piccadilly Line Performance (1) Question No: 2018/2030 Tony Devenish Do you think the performance of the Piccadilly Line over the last three months has been acceptable?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I recognise that the Piccadilly line service has not been good enough. This is unfortunately due to the age of its assets - this is a 1970s fleet of trains that is coming to the end of its life.

TfL has recently confirmed its intention to award Siemens Mobility Limited a contract to design and manufacture 94 new generation Tube trains that, from 2023, will transform the experience of millions of Piccadilly line customers. This is the first order under the Deep Tube Upgrade Programme which, combined with a signalling upgrade, will modernise four Tube lines - the Piccadilly, Bakerloo, Central, and Waterloo & City lines - and reduce journey times for millions of people.

In the interim, TfL is addressing the most common failure issues with some fleet-wide preventative maintenance. In signals, TfL has an interim signal upgrade, looking at stabilising the oldest assets before the full signal replacement which will come in once the new fleet of trains has been introduced.

I will continue to push TfL to do everything it possibly can to minimise disruption for customers.

Piccadilly Line Performance (2) Question No: 2018/2031 Tony Devenish How many Piccadilly Line trains are delayed per week, in both percentage and numerical terms? Please answer for the last 6 months.

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 216 Pop-up brothels Question No: 2018/2032 Tony Devenish What can you do to clamp down on pop-up brothels in London?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The Met already combines both enforcement and safeguarding in its response to 'pop-up' brothels and through the VAWG strategy I have committed to working with Local Authorities and police colleagues to develop a collective and strategic response to how issues around prostitution are managed across London.

We know that the vast majority of brothels are rental premises and therefore the tactics deployed when dealing with such venues would not be any different from those used to target established venues.

Two for the price of one police officers Question No: 2018/2033 Tony Devenish A group of my residents has asked for details re the possibility of funding a Police officer(s) to be based in their geographic vicinity rather than private security after a spate of nasty crimes. Following the "two for the price of one police officers " policy some London Boroughs have had in the past would a proposal (cost and conditions) be able to be worked up for consideration by my residents?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

The "two for the price of one police officer" scheme you refer to is dependent on Section 92 of the Police Act 1996, which is only available to Local Authorities.

London remains one of the safest cities in the world and every ward in London has at least two Dedicated Ward Officers (DWOs) and one Police Community Support Officer (PCSO).

Page 217 Central West BCU Question No: 2018/2034 Tony Devenish Why are you implementing the biggest cuts to police numbers (compared to April 2016) in the Central West BCU and how do you expect to cut crime in these areas with such big reductions?

The Mayor

As you know full well it is the Government's responsibility to properly fund police forces. Since 2010/11, the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) general grant funding from the Government has fallen by more than £700 million, or nearly 40 per cent in real terms.

I have done all that I can to mitigate these cuts - investing an additional £110million into the MPS through a combination of increased council tax and business rates. It is this investment that has enabled the MPS to support an additional 1,000 officers than would otherwise have been affordable.

City Hall is now paying a greater percentage of the overall police budget in the capital than ever before. But officer numbers remain under severe pressure and it is the Government that must act to address this.

The allocation of officers to Basic Command Units (BCUs) is based on a 'bottom up' resource modelling approach. This takes account of the capacity of individual officers to manage a workload in each of the major operational strands (response, safeguarding, neighbourhoods and investigation).

This is a more rigorous approach than that previously used, reflecting a more challenging operational and financial climate, and allowing a more accurate assessment of the impact of changes in demand.

The allocation for Central West BCU includes an additional 200 officers over and above the results of this process in recognition of the unique demands of policing this area - notably the West End.

This approach will be periodically reviewed so that changes in the policing demand across London can be assessed and the allocation adjusted when necessary.

Page 218 Ward Panels Question No: 2018/2035 Tony Devenish At a time of worrying levels of violent crime, muggings, moped enabled crime, and knife crime, community-police relations are crucial. The Met works closely with local communities at a ward level across London through local Police Ward Panels, overseen by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). Does the Mayor agree that political interference with these ward panels by local authorities to dilute their focus away from crime, and to disband currently well functioning ward panels and borough safer neighbourhood boards, is a mistake? Will the Mayor instruct MOPAC to robustly defend local Police Ward Panels, to protect this vital community- police link?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

I fully support ward panels, which are an important mechanism for the police to engage with local communities, particularly on setting ward priorities. MOPAC does not over see local ward panels, this is within the remit of the Metropolitan Police Service.

I am aware that several ward panels are ably chaired by local Councillors in a non-partisan, apolitical manner with a clear focus on policing issues.

MOPAC will continue to work with individual Boroughs to develop and support the most suitable and effective form of police and community engagement for that borough that ensures communities have the opportunity to hold the police to account and to influence local policing.

Page 219 Hammersmith Bridge Question No: 2018/2036 Tony Devenish As a crucial crossing of the River Thames in West London, Hammersmith Bridge is an important link between the Boroughs of Hammersmith & Fulham and Richmond upon Thames, that residents rely on. Will the Mayor provide an update on the condition of Hammersmith Bridge and Transport for London's efforts to maintain this route?

The Mayor

Hammersmith & Fulham (H&F) Council is the highway authority for Hammersmith Bridge and is responsible for its maintenance and repair. Transport for London (TfL) is supporting the council with the assessment and repair of the bridge.

Detailed analysis will be carried out by H&F Council's specialist contractors over the coming months. This will determine the full scope of the required work and whether more extensive structural works are required. This will allow the best course of action for the bridge to be determined.

In the meantime, there is a two to three-day closure planned in August 2018 to replace some defective deck panels.

Hammersmith Bridge - and the route it supports - is a high priority for TfL. Hammersmith Bridge is currently operating under severe weight restrictions with one bus permitted to travel in either direction at any one time. Staff will remain on site to manage the bus restrictions until permanent repair works are done.

Westminster Council CCTV Question No: 2018/2039 Peter Whittle To ask the Mayor what has been the impact, if any, on criminal activity of Westminster Council's 2016 decision to scrap its entire network of 75 CCTV cameras?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 220 Met Police Training Courses Question No: 2018/2040 Peter Whittle I note the report about the Metropolitan Police in the Daily Telegraph on 3 June 2018, which stated: 'More than 10,000 officers and staff will attend five days' worth of training courses before the end of the year, as well as taking personality tests to tell them what 'colour' they are.'1 How much is this going to cost and given that you have repeatedly made the point that the Met is short of funds, how can you justify this expenditure?

1 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/03/met-police-accused-wasting-10m- leadership-training-programme/?WT.mc_id=tmg_share_tw

The Mayor

It is absolutely right that the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) invests in the development and skills of its people.

The 'Leading for London' programme is a comprehensive training package involving facilitated workshops, coaching, 360 feedback, psychometric tests, access to a digital learning system and, for Superintendents and above, detailed simulation exercises.

This training is being delivered to over 10,300 officers and staff over the year. The figure of £10million quoted in the press is for the programme in its entirety and represents less than £1,000 per officer trained.

The officers and staff of the MPS make difficult decisions in a busy and stressful environment. Good training requires investment and the MPS must support and develop its staff to be the best they can be. Effective leadership and training are vital to ensure Londoners get the best service possible.

Page 221 Police Rest Days Question No: 2018/2041 Peter Whittle To ask the Mayor how many rest days are currently owed to officers serving with the Metropolitan Police?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 26/07/2018

The Government’s cuts to police funding have hit London harder than anywhere else in the UK. For the first time since 2003, police numbers in London has fallen to below 30,000. Our police force is over-stretched and under resourced and, as a result, officers have had to cancel their rest days and work overtime.

As of June 2018, the number of owed rest days stands at 191,258.

The circumstances under which the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) can cancel rest days and the procedures for doing so are laid down in police regulations. Re-rostering rest days is a means for police forces to manage demand and there will always be a working backlog of days owed.

The number of days being cancelled has reduced in 2018 and the MPS is working to reduce the number of owed days and to ensure officers can take re-rostered rest days in a timely manner. But the only way we will be able to prevent this from continuing to be an issue is for the Government to properly fund our police service.

On behalf of all Londoners, I want to thank all our police officers for their incredible service and commitment to our city.

Police and Intelligence Question No: 2018/2042 Peter Whittle To ask the Mayor what assessment the Metropolitan Police has made of the possibility that any officer serving with the force with joint nationality may be an active asset of foreign intelligence services?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

The Metropolitan Police Service employs a rigorous vetting regime for all new and existing staff, a component of which is a CTC (Counter Terrorism Check) with external agencies.

Page 222 Operation Midland Question No: 2018/2043 Peter Whittle To ask the Mayor whether Operation Midland is complete and if so, what was the total cost of that investigation?

The Mayor

The MPS investigation, under the name Operation Midland, was closed on 21st March 2016.

The MPS issued costs for Operation Midland periodically through the duration of the inquiry, and concluded the total cost of the inquiry was approximately £2.5 million based on staffing costs and overtime expenditure.

This figure can only be an approximation as on occasion, officers working on Operation Midland may have had to undertake other duties, for example attend court on unrelated cases.

Underground noise levels Question No: 2018/2044 David Kurten What assessment has Transport for London made of the noise levels on the Central line between Holland Park and Notting Hill?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) has measured noise levels, both in local residents' homes and on board trains. TfL is aware noise levels coming from the eastbound Central line track in this area are high and has been engaging with the local community to keep them informed about plans to resolve this.

In August 2016 and May 2018 TfL fitted resilient track fastenings, which reduce ground vibrations caused by trains, to a 165m section of eastbound track located 215m away from Holland Park station. This reduced noise levels significantly, as corroborated by local residents at a recent community meeting.

TfL plans to install more resilient track fastenings over a 100m section of eastbound track. However, TfL has received reports of increased noise from passengers on board trains as they pass through tunnels where track fastenings have been installed. In response to this, TfL is procuring new softer rail pads to be fitted to this section. These softer pads will still reduce noise levels within residents' homes while also maintaining a lower level of in-train noise.

In addition, TfL is conducting a joint research project with Cambridge University to understand the impact of property development on residential noise levels coming from TfL's infrastructure.

Page 223 Underground overcrowding Question No: 2018/2045 David Kurten How many times over the last 2 years has the London Underground Paddington Station via stairs entrance been temporarily shut because of overcrowding?

The Mayor

In the last two years, there have been no full station closures due to congestion.

As a major station, the number of commuters travelling through Paddington Underground Station has increased over the past few years. In response to this, passenger access to the platform via the staircases is temporarily closed between 07:30hrs - 10:00hrs and sometimes in the evening between 17:00hrs - 19:00, Monday to Friday, to manage the flow of customers and maintain a safe and comfortable station environment. As a crowd control and safety measure, this is only for customers entering the station. Passengers leaving the station have full access to all exits.

As the station still remains open, TfL does not hold data for the partial closures to manage congestion. Any temporary closures are also only in place for a few minutes.

Policing Question No: 2018/2046 Peter Whittle What has been the cost so far to the Metropolitan Police Service for policing the anti-Brexit daily demonstration on Old Palace Yard?

The Mayor

The daily Anti-Brexit demonstration in Old Palace Yard has been peaceful with relatively small numbers attending.

It has not required a policing presence and there has been no cost to the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) for policing this demonstration.

Page 224 Sexual Offences Question No: 2018/2047 Peter Whittle What assessments have the Metropolitan Police made over the last ten years of the 193% rise in reports to the police of rape

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 27/07/2018

Both the Met and I recognise that the level of reporting of sexual offences and rape has continued to rise and analysis shows that this trend will remain upwards over the next two to five years. We recognise that rape and all sexual offences remain significantly under-reported and it is not yet clear how much of the increased numbers of reports to police is entirely due to greater confidence to report, or an increase in sexual offending overall.

This is a national concern. I made a commitment in my Police and Crime Plan to undertake analysis of both domestic and sexual violence data so that we can say with much greater certainty what changes in figures mean. This analysis work is underway.

In the meantime, it is important to state that the Met have worked hard to encourage victims of rape and serious sexual assault to come forward and report to police. They have worked with agencies such as the NHS, education and local councils to ensure that sexual offences are reported to police. Working in partnership with the London Havens service there is also an opportunity for victims to report anonymously.

Hate Crimes Question No: 2018/2048 Peter Whittle Why does the MPS report Islamophobic and anti-Semitic crimes specifically but not Christianophobic crimes?

The Mayor

The Metropolitan Police Service adheres to the crime recording guidelines set by the Home Office and this is reflected in the way hate crime levels are reported. Offences against anyone on the basis of their faith will be recorded whether they be Christian, Jewish, Muslim or any other faith.

Islamophobic and anti-Semitic hate crimes, which constitute 87% of all faith hate crimes, differ from other hate crimes in that levels can be influenced by national or international events.

Page 225 Grooming Gang Scandal Question No: 2018/2049 Peter Whittle Operation Grandbye has now been in operation for 6 months (see Question 2018/0858) What has been its preliminary report on the situation?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Uber Judgment Question No: 2018/2050 David Kurten Has Transport for London accepted any money from Uber for their court costs and has this influenced the decision on whether to take the dispute with Uber to the Supreme Court?

The Mayor

Electric Vehicle Charging (1) Question No: 2018/2051 David Kurten How many electric vehicles do you anticipate being registered in London by the year 2040?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Electric Vehicle Charging (2) Question No: 2018/2052 David Kurten How much electricity (in GWh) do you anticipate being needed to charge all the electric vehicles registered in London by 2040?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Page 226 Uber (1) Question No: 2018/2053 David Kurten Uber has apparently revised its booking process to be compliant to the 1998 Private Hire Vehicles Act. Do they now sub-contract bookings between the operator licences they hold with different authorities?

The Mayor

Uber London Limited has made changes to its booking process which Transport for London considers to be compliant with private hire legislation.

It is legal for London licensed private hire operators to sub-contract bookings to operators licensed by another authority.

Uber (2) Question No: 2018/2054 David Kurten What forensic, physical checks has Transport for London (TfL) done to ensure that all bookings are now compliant? Has TfL made the same mistakes as before and just taken assurances, from Uber or a third party such as Deloitte?

The Mayor

TfL commissioned an independent review of Uber London Limited's booking processes and is satisfied that these processes are now compliant with private hire legislation.

Page 227 Uber (4) Question No: 2018/2056 David Kurten What message does giving Uber a new Licence send out, given the high number of sexual assaults recorded as being committed by Uber drivers? What are you going to do to ensure that the public, particularly vulnerable women, are safe if they use an Uber vehicle?

The Mayor

Any offence committed against a passenger in a taxi or private hire vehicle is one offence too many. Thousands of people use these services every day, and public safety is my top priority.

The Metropolitan Police Service's (MPS) dedicated Taxi and Private Hire Policing Team is at the forefront of tackling illegal taxi and private hire activity and carries out regular operational night time deployments to target offenders. The team, in partnership with TfL, also runs a number of weekly high-visibility stop sites, where officers undertake roadside checks of taxi and private hire vehicles and drivers.

On 26 June, the Chief Magistrate at Westminster Magistrates' Court granted Uber London Limited a private hire operator's licence for 15 months - but with a clear set of conditions that TfL will closely monitor and enforce. These conditions include arrangements with the MPS for reporting passenger complaints as well as other requirements relating to complaint handling and reporting.

More information on these conditions can be found at: www.tfl.gov.uk/tph-news

Uber (5) Question No: 2018/2057 David Kurten Would you agree that having given Uber a new licence, if it is found that Uber's Modus Operandi has not changed one iota and the new version is just smoke and mirrors in front of the old 'Driver Accepting' business model, this would be extremely irresponsible and a matter worth resigning over?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) refused Uber London Limited (ULL) an operating licence in September 2017. This is a decision that has been found by the court to be the right one at that time and has been accepted by ULL.

ULL was granted a 15 month licence, subject to a number of conditions, by the Chief Magistrate at its appeal hearing on 26 June. TfL will closely monitor ULL's adherence to these stringent conditions for the duration of the licence. More information can be found at www.tfl.gov.uk/tph-news.

Page 228 Uber (6) Question No: 2018/2058 David Kurten If Uber's claims to have changed are proved to be false and more vulnerable woman are put at risk, would you consider this a matter requiring your resignation from office?

The Mayor

Please see my response to Mayor's Question 2018/2057.

Uber (7) Question No: 2018/2059 David Kurten When was Uber's new Modus Operandi checked and by whom?

The Mayor

Uber London Limited (ULL) has made a number of changes and commitments to change in relation to its corporate structure and working practices.

ULL was granted a 15 month licence, subject to a number of conditions, by the Chief Magistrate at its appeal hearing on 26 June. TfL will closely monitor ULL's adherence to these stringent conditions for the duration of the licence.

Further information on these changes and the Magistrate's judgment can be found here: www.tfl.gov.uk/tph-news

TfL commissioned an independent review of ULL's booking processes and is satisfied that these processes are now compliant with private hire legislation.

Uber (8) Question No: 2018/2060 David Kurten Did Transport for London carry out an independent, impartial investigation into Uber's new Booking Process inside London?

The Mayor

Yes. Transport for London (TfL) commissioned an independent review of Uber London Limited booking processes and is satisfied that these processes are now compliant with private hire legislation.

Page 229 Uber (9) Question No: 2018/2061 David Kurten Is the Mayor aware that Uber classes the airports at Stansted, Gatwick, and Luton as London Airports and put them in their 'London' region so that they can use Transport for London Licensed Drivers, despite the fact that the airports are all well outside the Greater London Area?

The Mayor

Transport for London (TfL) and I share your concerns about what has become known as cross border hiring. This practice, that can see private hire services operating exclusively outside the area in which they are licensed, as long as the driver, vehicle and operator are all licensed in one area, is legal. That is why I continue to lobby Government for measures to address this.

TfL published a paper 'Cross Border Hiring - Proposals for Legislative Change (http://content.tfl.gov.uk/cross-border-hiring-proposals.pdf) earlier this year - and we await the outcome of the Department for Transport Task and Finish Group on Taxi and Private Hire, which considered a number of issues including cross border hiring.

I remain firmly of the view that licensing authorities should be able to set and enforce standards within their local area - something which this regionalisation fails to deliver.

My Deputy Mayor, Heidi Alexander, recently met with Nusrat Ghani MP, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department for Transport, to press the case for urgent legislative change to restrict cross border hiring.

Uber (10) Question No: 2018/2062 David Kurten What action will be taken against Uber drivers following the revelation in court that drivers were, and may still be, accepting trips directly from customers?

The Mayor

TfL is satisfied that the way in which Uber London Limited (ULL) accepts bookings is compliant with private hire legislation. As confirmed in TfL's evidence at the appeal hearing, since TfL's decision in September last year ULL have made changes to the way the app booking process works to remove any room for doubt about that.

Page 230 Transport for London Compliance Officers (1) Question No: 2018/2063 David Kurten How often are Transport for London Compliance Operations carried out at airports outside London?

The Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Written response from the Mayor received 31/07/2018

All Transport for London (TfL) compliance operations are carried out on an intelligence-led basis and balanced alongside other compliance priorities at that time. In the last 12 months, joint compliance operations have taken place at the following airports outside of London to support local authorities in the area. As TfL is not the licensing authority in these locations, these compliance operations would of course be in addition to any other operations by the local licensing authorities.

Airport No of Operations

Stansted 12

Luton 3

Gatwick 2

Southend 2

Transport for London Compliance Officers (2) Question No: 2018/2064 David Kurten What is the cost of a Compliance Operation carried out by Transport for London at an airport outside London?

The Mayor

On average, anything between two and twelve Taxi and Private Hire Compliance officers can be deployed to undertake operations at an airport, depending on the size of the operation and the scale of the issues identified.

The average salary of a compliance officer equates to about £130 per day. All compliance operations are covered within existing staff pay budgets, and there is no additional cost for these to take place.

Page 231 London Living Wage (2) Question No: 2018/2065 Leonie Cooper How many London Boroughs are now publicly committed to paying the London Living Wage not only to their directly employed staff, but also to any staff fulfilling outsourced contract arrangements?

The Mayor

There are currently 16 London Living Wage accredited boroughs in London. Under the terms of this accreditation, the London Living Wage must apply to all directly employed staff, as well as regularly contracted staff. The exact definition is those contracted staff who work 2 or more hours a day, in any day of the week, for 8 or more consecutive weeks of the year.

Oral Update to the Mayor's Report Question No: 2018/2066 Tony Arbour Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): The Mayor will now provide an oral update of up to five minutes in length on matters occurring since the publication of his report. Assembly Members have submitted two requests for topics for inclusion within the update.

The Mayor

Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Good morning. This week the news has been dominated by Brexit yet again, an issue that could have profound consequences for the lives of millions of Londoners. Since the day after the European Union (EU) referendum, I have been working to ensure that London’s voice is heard and to fight for a Brexit deal that is in the best interests of all Londoners, and that is what I will continue to do.

Last week I wrote to the Prime Minister [the Rt. Hon Theresa May MP] to warn her that the Government’s White Paper completely fails to meet the needs of our leading service sectors, which represent 92% of our economy in London, a concern shared by many business leaders in London and across our country. There is no doubt that the kind of hard Brexit the Government is now proposing would throw up new regulatory barriers that will damage the ability of our world-leading creative, tech and financial services to do business across the EU. This would cause huge economic harm, with repercussions felt not just here in London but across the country. Worse still, with the division and disarray within the Government and the Prime Minister capitulating once again to the hard Brexiteers in her party, it is clearer than ever before there is a grave risk that we could crash out of the EU with no deal at all. This is the worst possible scenario, one that independent experts predict could lead to nearly 90,000 fewer jobs in our city. That is why I have instructed officials here at City Hall to step up preparations for such a devastating no-deal situation. I urge the Prime Minister to start putting the national interest ahead of her own interests, and her country ahead of her party. We are now running out of time. The Government needs to change course and quickly, and accept that staying within the single market and the customs union is the best way to protect jobs and growth across the United Kingdom (UK).

Since we last met, I have also been working on a number of strategies and initiatives to improve

Page 232 the lives of Londoners. This includes continuing to do everything possible to tackle violent crime, not only by cracking down on violent crime but the root causes of violent crime, too. I have also continued to lobby Ministers for the extra resources we need to help keep our city safe.

Chairman, I have been asked for two oral updates. The first one is on the Brexit White Paper from Assembly Member [Andrew] Dismore. I wrote to the Prime Minister last week warning that her White Paper completely fails to meet the needs of our leading service sectors, a concern shared by many London and UK business leaders. This kind of hard Brexit will throw up new regulatory barriers which will damage the ability of our world-leading creative, tech, professional and financial services to do business across the EU, putting jobs at risk across the country. 92% of London’s economy is service-based, and the strength of these businesses is seen beyond the capital. The financial and professional services industries alone employ over 2.2 million people across the country, only a third of whom are based in London. Trading services accounts for roughly 40% of UK exports to the EU and includes our world-leading financial services, accountants and lawyers.

It was my intention to respond more fully to the White Paper, taking on board the advice of my Brexit Advisory Panel. However, given the Prime Minister’s capitulation to her hard Brexiteers, it is looking increasingly unclear whether there will be a White Paper to respond to. It is already clear that the kind of Brexit that the Government is currently offering is untested, complex, expensive, and will take years to fully implement. Even if the EU were to agree with the deal being proposed, due to the exclusion of services there is a very real risk that jobs and investment that could have been ours might go elsewhere in Europe. Now, with the Prime Minister having accepted amendments to the Customs Bill proposed by hard-line Brexiteers, it is clearer than ever that we are at grave risk of crashing out of the EU with no deal, a situation that would cost nearly 90,000 jobs in London and nearly 500,000 across the UK according to independent analysis we commissioned from Cambridge Econometrics. This is now a risk. That is why in my letter to the Prime Minister last Friday I urged her, for the good of the economy and thousands of people’s jobs, to change course and seek a deal that keeps us in the Single Market and Customs Union.

The second request, Chairman, for an urgent oral update was from Assembly Member [Caroline] Pidgeon MBE. It is on Oxford Street. I wrote to the Leader of Westminster [Council] on 3 July [2018] and stated my disappointment at Westminster’s unilateral decision to walk away from two years of joint work to transform Oxford Street and the surrounding district. Westminster is the highway and planning authority for Oxford Street, and it is now incumbent on it to prepare an alternative plan that adequately addresses the known challenges to the area, including poor air quality, road safety, pedestrian crowding and a poor public realm. Failure to address these issues comprehensively and holistically will undermine the future economic success of London’s West End offer. The success of Oxford Street is important not only to the economic prosperity of London but also to the UK economy as a whole. The Council has now set out its intention to bring forward some initial pedestrianisation and safety changes to be delivered later this year, followed by a wider piece of work on the Oxford Street district. This timetable indicated Westminster will provide information on the safety scheme next month. I expect it to stick to this timeline, and I have also requested an update on the district-wide scheme by September [2018].

When I have seen these proposals and assessed how they address the challenges in the area, I will make a decision on Transport for London’s (TfL) and the GLA’s next steps for this project.

Page 233 We are doing our part and have already reduced the number of buses that use Oxford Street by 40%, and we continue to do what we can to reduce this further. Now it is up to the Council to step up and tell us how it proposes to make Oxford Street fit for a world-leading 21st-century city. It is worth reminding Assembly Members that pedestrianised Oxford Street was a manifesto commitment also made by the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives.

Thank you. I look forward to answering questions during the course of this morning.

Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much.

Page 234 Appendix 2018/1774 Appendix 2018_1774 - Recording judicial outcomes of hit and run offences

Year Month CSJ Code PNLD Title Grand Total 2017 June RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 30 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 59 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 72 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details July RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 28 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 45 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 68 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details August RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 23 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 28 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 42 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details September RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 22 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 44 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 58 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details October RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 26 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 37 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 56 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details

Page 235 Appendix 2018_1774 - Recording judicial outcomes of hit and run offences

November RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 30 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 52 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 66 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details December HA1 4102 Driver of a vehicle fail 1 to stop / provide own / owner details after an injury / damage accident on Heathrow Airport - Contrary to byelaws 10.2 and 2.3 of the Heathrow Airport - London Byelaws, 2014 and section 63 of the Airports Act 1986 HA9 6102 Driver of a vehicle fail 0 to stop / provide own / owner details after an injury / damage accident on Heathrow Airport - Contrary to byelaws 10(2) and 2(3) of the Heathrow Airport - London Byelaws 1996 and section 63 of the Airports Act 1986 RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 25 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 28 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 51 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details 2018 January RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 21 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 35 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 55 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details

Page 236 Appendix 2018_1774 - Recording judicial outcomes of hit and run offences

February RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 23 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 33 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 43 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details March RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 27 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 28 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 32 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details April RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 15 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 9 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 13 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details May RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 8 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 13 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 15 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details June RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 7 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 2 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 4 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details

Page 237 Appendix 2018_1774 - Recording judicial outcomes of hit and run offences

July RT8 82 18 Driver failed to stop 1 after a road accident RT8 82 20 Driver involved in an 1 accident failed to report the accident RT8 82 21 Driver failed to stop 0 after a road accident – to give name and address of self and owner/vehicle details

Page 238 Appendix 2018/1927

Notes

Mayors Question No: 2018/1927:

The CB flag will be used for the purpose of all Noxious / corrosive liquids offences (where a liquid is used against a person or property). Data cleanse was undertaken which identified those incidents where the CB flag is not appropriate.

Example where petrol has been used as an accelerant to ignite a person / building / object. In this instance the CB code would be removed. However if petrol / bleach etc was used to incapacitate / injury an individual then the CB flag would be retained. A new feature code of CF feature code has been created (definition: Noxious or corrosive fluid eg acid found in possession of suspect or the threat of such material to be used in crime) this identifies occasions where a noxious / corrosive liquid has not been used in the commission of a crime however either the threat of an offence was stated or the substance was found in the suspects possession. In both of these instances the CB flag should not be used. Page 239 Page

Last Refresh Date: 09/05/18 MetHQ Information and Insight - 783131 Data is subject to daily change Ad-Hoc Ref: 11861 If you have any queries with this report, please contact the Helpdesk © MOPAC 2018 Appendix 2018/1997

Burglary where a "weapon" Feature was recorded by the MPS Month Count of Notifiable Offences Count of Sanction Detections Year May-16 627 38 Jun-16 562 46 Jul-16 566 56 Aug-16 507 47 Sep-16 524 54 Oct-16 585 32 Nov-16 743 37 Dec-16 842 53 Jan-17 864 38 Feb-17 759 37 Mar-17 737 43 Apr-17 635 41 May-17 572 48 Jun-17 498 54 Jul-17 567 52 Aug-17 559 39 Sep-17 575 40 Oct-17 620 42 Nov-17 694 33 Dec-17 545 37 Jan-18 687 50 Feb-18 553 27 Mar-18 517 24 Apr-18 512 19 May-18 469 18 Jun-18 416 8

Notes

Mayors Question No. 2018/1997 " From May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of the total number of burglaries in London when a weapon was used and the sanction detection rate? "

The MPS does not have an official definition or a pre-built product to answer "weapons used at a burglary" so the following method has been used.

Live Notifiable Offences data was extracted from CRIS on 13/07/2018 covering a recorded date range of 01/05/2016 to 30/06/2018 The CRIS query was limited to Notifiable Offences of Burglary.

Live Sanction Detection Data was extracted from CRIS on 16th July covering a Cleared Up date range of 01/01/2010 to 15th July 2018. The CRIS query was limited to the Sanction Detections of Offences of Burglary. This data set was then matched to the Notoifiable Offences of Burglary using the Unique Crime reference in both data sets.

A known MPS CRIS data feed for Gun Crime and an adapted Knife Crime CRIS run was matched to the Burglary data set using the unique crime reference in each.

Knife Crime does not nornally include Burglary as part of it's conditions, so the basic Knife Crime query was adapted to include Offences of Burglary keeping the usual Feature codes as part of this adapted CRIS run.

A further two CRIS queries were built limited to Offences of Burglary using the following two sets of Feature codes not part of the Gun Crime data feed & adapted Knife Crime CRIS query. However, all crime reports that return a count of data in the tables for these last two "weapon" queries would require reading to determine if the circumstances that required the addition of these feature codes to a crime report were used as a means to gain entry to a propertry to commit the burglary or used against a victim of that burglary. In all cases a Feature code relates to the whole circumstances of the offence committed and it is possible that multiple Feature codes can be added to one crime report.

Set One - Other Possible Weapon Feature Codes: BB Blunt instrument used e.g. hammer BC Rope used e.g. to tie victim up BD Wire used e.g. to tie victim up BF Handcuffs used BE Keys Used BM Tape used e.g. Masking tape, Sellotape BO Other tool/weapon not included above (excluding firearms)

Set Two - Noxious/Corrosive/Stupefying substance/DuoV Feature Codes: CA Noxious or corrosive gas, including aerosol, used CB Noxious or corrosive gas used e.g. acid thrown CC Stupefying substance used e.g. ether, chloroform, Solvent CE Drug(s) used on victim (DuoV) CF Noxious or corrosive substance threatened or carried

Gun Crime offences are categorised as such if they satisfy the following criteria: 1. The offence classification is ANY notifiable * offence AND The crime report includes one of the 4 ‘S’ feature codes identifying that a firearm has been used AND The crime report includes one of the 23 ‘R’ feature codes for barrelled firearms (thus excluding CS Gas [RT] and Pepper Spray [RU]) ** OR 2. The offence classification is one of ‘Possession of a Firearm with Intent’ (HO codes: 005/14 – 16, 008/03, 008/13 – 15, 008/16 – 18, 008/23 – 25, 008/54) AND The crime report includes one of the 23 ‘R’ feature codes for barrelled firearms (thus excluding CS Gas [RT] and Pepper Spray [RU]) **

* A notifiable offence as defined under the Home Office Counting Rules ** If a crime report has both an RT/RU and one of the 23 barrelled ‘R’ feature codes, then it will still be counted as Gun Crime

SB Firearm used as a blunt Instrument to injure SF Any Firearm Fired SP Firearm intimated: victim convinced weapon present ST Any firearm used as a threat RA Shotgun (long barrelled) RB Shotgun (sawn off) RC Handgun (converted imitation) RD Handgun (reactivated) RE Handgun (converted air pistol) RF Handgun (other) Page 240 RG Handgun (unknown) RH Imitation Handgun RI Unconverted starting gun RJ Rifle RK Air weapon RL Soft Air Weapon RM Ball Bearing Gun RN Deactivated Firearm RO Other firearm RP Blank Firer RR Other imitation RS Supposed firearm RT CS Gas Needs to be recorded if relevant but as of 01/04/2008 Not a Gun Crime when used in isolation. RU Pepper spray Needs to be recorded if relevant but as of 01/04/2008 Not a Gun Crime when used in isolation. RV Machine gun RW Stun Gun RX Other converted imitation firearm RY Other reactivated firearm RZ Disguised Firearm

Adapted Knife Crime Definition with the addition of Notifiable Offences of Burglary The offence is a confirmed classification relating to one of the following Home Office Offence Groupings (CrimSec Codes): Murder (1) Attempted murder (2) Threats to kill (3B) Manslaughter (4/1) Infanticide (4/2) Wounding or carrying out an act endangering life (5A*) Wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm without intent (8F* & 8H*) Actual Bodily Harm (8G* & 8J*) Sexual assault (17 & 20) Rape (19) Robbery (34A & 34B) Burglary (28-31) and where a feature code identifying weapon usage (countable as knife crime) has been added to the crime report. XI Knife or other sharp instrument used to injure XP Knife+ intimated - victim convinced weapon present XT Knife or sharp used as threat or attempt to injure

Counting of Sanction Detections A Sanction Detection is counted if all three of the following conditions are met for a single CRIS record: The record has a status of D (Detected) There is a Clear Up Reason Code that signifies a Charge/Summons, a Caution, an FPN , or a Cannabis Warning There is at least one accused on the crime record that has a proceedings code that signifies a Charge, Summons, Caution, an FPN or a Cannabis Warning. Note that if there is not an accused on the record with a valid proceedings code, then it cannot be counted as a Sanction Detection.

Page 241 Appendix 2018/1997

Burglary where a "weapon" Feature was recorded by the MPS Month Count of Notifiable Offences Count of Sanction Detections Year May-16 627 38 Jun-16 562 46 Jul-16 566 56 Aug-16 507 47 Sep-16 524 54 Oct-16 585 32 Nov-16 743 37 Dec-16 842 53 Jan-17 864 38 Feb-17 759 37 Mar-17 737 43 Apr-17 635 41 May-17 572 48 Jun-17 498 54 Jul-17 567 52 Aug-17 559 39 Sep-17 575 40 Oct-17 620 42 Nov-17 694 33 Dec-17 545 37 Jan-18 687 50 Feb-18 553 27 Mar-18 517 24 Apr-18 512 19 May-18 469 18 Jun-18 416 8

Notes

Mayors Question No. 2018/1997 " From May 2016, please can you provide a monthly breakdown of the total number of burglaries in London when a weapon was used and the sanction detection rate? "

The MPS does not have an official definition or a pre-built product to answer "weapons used at a burglary" so the following method has been used.

Live Notifiable Offences data was extracted from CRIS on 13/07/2018 covering a recorded date range of 01/05/2016 to 30/06/2018 The CRIS query was limited to Notifiable Offences of Burglary.

Live Sanction Detection Data was extracted from CRIS on 16th July covering a Cleared Up date range of 01/01/2010 to 15th July 2018. The CRIS query was limited to the Sanction Detections of Offences of Burglary. This data set was then matched to the Notoifiable Offences of Burglary using the Unique Crime reference in both data sets.

A known MPS CRIS data feed for Gun Crime and an adapted Knife Crime CRIS run was matched to the Burglary data set using the unique crime reference in each.

Knife Crime does not nornally include Burglary as part of it's conditions, so the basic Knife Crime query was adapted to include Offences of Burglary keeping the usual Feature codes as part of this adapted CRIS run.

A further two CRIS queries were built limited to Offences of Burglary using the following two sets of Feature codes not part of the Gun Crime data feed & adapted Knife Crime CRIS query. However, all crime reports that return a count of data in the tables for these last two "weapon" queries would require reading to determine if the circumstances that required the addition of these feature codes to a crime report were used as a means to gain entry to a propertry to commit the burglary or used against a victim of that burglary. In all cases a Feature code relates to the whole circumstances of the offence committed and it is possible that multiple Feature codes can be added to one crime report.

Set One - Other Possible Weapon Feature Codes: BB Blunt instrument used e.g. hammer BC Rope used e.g. to tie victim up BD Wire used e.g. to tie victim up BF Handcuffs used BE Keys Used BM Tape used e.g. Masking tape, Sellotape BO Other tool/weapon not included above (excluding firearms)

Set Two - Noxious/Corrosive/Stupefying substance/DuoV Feature Codes: CA Noxious or corrosive gas, including aerosol, used CB Noxious or corrosive gas used e.g. acid thrown CC Stupefying substance used e.g. ether, chloroform, Solvent CE Drug(s) used on victim (DuoV) CF Noxious or corrosive substance threatened or carried

Gun Crime offences are categorised as such if they satisfy the following criteria: 1. The offence classification is ANY notifiable * offence AND The crime report includes one of the 4 ‘S’ feature codes identifying that a firearm has been used AND The crime report includes one of the 23 ‘R’ feature codes for barrelled firearms (thus excluding CS Gas [RT] and Pepper Spray [RU]) ** OR 2. The offence classification is one of ‘Possession of a Firearm with Intent’ (HO codes: 005/14 – 16, 008/03, 008/13 – 15, 008/16 – 18, 008/23 – 25, 008/54) AND The crime report includes one of the 23 ‘R’ feature codes for barrelled firearms (thus excluding CS Gas [RT] and Pepper Spray [RU]) **

* A notifiable offence as defined under the Home Office Counting Rules ** If a crime report has both an RT/RU and one of the 23 barrelled ‘R’ feature codes, then it will still be counted as Gun Crime

SB Firearm used as a blunt Instrument to injure SF Any Firearm Fired SP Firearm intimated: victim convinced weapon present ST Any firearm used as a threat RA Shotgun (long barrelled) RB Shotgun (sawn off) RC Handgun (converted imitation) RD Handgun (reactivated) RE Handgun (converted air pistol) RF Handgun (other) Page 242 RG Handgun (unknown) RH Imitation Handgun RI Unconverted starting gun RJ Rifle RK Air weapon RL Soft Air Weapon RM Ball Bearing Gun RN Deactivated Firearm RO Other firearm RP Blank Firer RR Other imitation RS Supposed firearm RT CS Gas Needs to be recorded if relevant but as of 01/04/2008 Not a Gun Crime when used in isolation. RU Pepper spray Needs to be recorded if relevant but as of 01/04/2008 Not a Gun Crime when used in isolation. RV Machine gun RW Stun Gun RX Other converted imitation firearm RY Other reactivated firearm RZ Disguised Firearm

Adapted Knife Crime Definition with the addition of Notifiable Offences of Burglary The offence is a confirmed classification relating to one of the following Home Office Offence Groupings (CrimSec Codes): Murder (1) Attempted murder (2) Threats to kill (3B) Manslaughter (4/1) Infanticide (4/2) Wounding or carrying out an act endangering life (5A*) Wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm without intent (8F* & 8H*) Actual Bodily Harm (8G* & 8J*) Sexual assault (17 & 20) Rape (19) Robbery (34A & 34B) Burglary (28-31) and where a feature code identifying weapon usage (countable as knife crime) has been added to the crime report. XI Knife or other sharp instrument used to injure XP Knife+ intimated - victim convinced weapon present XT Knife or sharp used as threat or attempt to injure

Counting of Sanction Detections A Sanction Detection is counted if all three of the following conditions are met for a single CRIS record: The record has a status of D (Detected) There is a Clear Up Reason Code that signifies a Charge/Summons, a Caution, an FPN , or a Cannabis Warning There is at least one accused on the crime record that has a proceedings code that signifies a Charge, Summons, Caution, an FPN or a Cannabis Warning. Note that if there is not an accused on the record with a valid proceedings code, then it cannot be counted as a Sanction Detection.

Page 243 Appendix 2018/2003

Month Year Pursuits per month No. involving Motorcycles or mopeds

May-16 64 25 Jun-16 37 11 Jul-16 136 40 Aug-16 118 40 Sep-16 141 40 Oct-16 167 48 Nov-16 200 62 Dec-16 165 42 Jan-17 216 59 Feb-17 192 57 Mar-17 175 69 Apr-17 171 62 May-17 139 57 Jun-17 126 50 Jul-17 132 51 Aug-17 138 56 Sep-17 118 46 Oct-17 135 44 Nov-17 135 56 Dec-17 127 40 Jan-18 168 61 Feb-18 116 44 Mar-18 115 45 Apr-18 94 26 May-18 128 51 Jun-18 131 55

Page 244 Subject evaded police/Pursuit No. ceased due to disproportionate discontinued/subject vehicle danger posed to subject/public abandoned 422 110 13 37 739 538 644 559 541 252 840 864 859 14 51 646 11 44 12 50 338 641 252 338 454 540 641 419 343 949

Page 245 Appendix 2018/2002

Month Year Pursuits per month No. involving Motorcycles or mopeds

May-16 64 25 Jun-16 37 11 Jul-16 136 40 Aug-16 118 40 Sep-16 141 40 Oct-16 167 48 Nov-16 200 62 Dec-16 165 42 Jan-17 216 59 Feb-17 192 57 Mar-17 175 69 Apr-17 171 62 May-17 139 57 Jun-17 126 50 Jul-17 132 51 Aug-17 138 56 Sep-17 118 46 Oct-17 135 44 Nov-17 135 56 Dec-17 127 40 Jan-18 168 61 Feb-18 116 44 Mar-18 115 45 Apr-18 94 26 May-18 128 51 Jun-18 131 55

Page 246 Subject evaded police/Pursuit No. ceased due to disproportionate discontinued/subject vehicle danger posed to subject/public abandoned 422 110 13 37 739 538 644 559 541 252 840 864 859 14 51 646 11 44 12 50 338 641 252 338 454 540 641 419 343 949

Page 247 Appendix 2018/2004

Month Year Pursuits per month No. involving Motorcycles or mopeds

May-16 64 25 Jun-16 37 11 Jul-16 136 40 Aug-16 118 40 Sep-16 141 40 Oct-16 167 48 Nov-16 200 62 Dec-16 165 42 Jan-17 216 59 Feb-17 192 57 Mar-17 175 69 Apr-17 171 62 May-17 139 57 Jun-17 126 50 Jul-17 132 51 Aug-17 138 56 Sep-17 118 46 Oct-17 135 44 Nov-17 135 56 Dec-17 127 40 Jan-18 168 61 Feb-18 116 44 Mar-18 115 45 Apr-18 94 26 May-18 128 51 Jun-18 131 55 Totals 3584 1237

Page 248 Subject evaded police/Pursuit No. ceased due to disproportionate discontinued/subject vehicle danger posed to subject/public abandoned 422 110 13 37 739 538 644 559 541 252 840 864 859 14 51 646 11 44 12 50 338 641 252 338 454 540 641 419 343 949 160 1111

Page 249 This page is intentionally left blank

Page 250