Arbitration Summary and Award Log s8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arbitration Summary and Award Log s8

ARBITRATION SUMMARY AND AWARD LOG OCB AWARD NUMBER: 1160

OCB GRIEVANCE NUMBER: 34-28-19951025-0182-01-09-

GRIEVANT NAME: PROBST, KAREN L. UNION: OCSEA DEPARTMENT: WORKERS COMP. ARBITRATOR: GRAHAM, HARRY

MANAGEMENT ADVOCATE: BRUNDIGE, EUGENE 2ND CHAIR: UNION ADVOCATE: ARBITRATION DATE: 9/13/1996 DECISION DATE: 9/28/1996 DECISION: GRANTED CONTRACT SECTIONS:

HOLDING:

COST: SUBJECT: ARB SUMMARY #1160

TO: ALL ADVOCATES

FROM: KENNETH COUCH

AGENCY: WORKERS COMP. UNION: OCSEA ARBITRATOR: GRAHAM, HARRY STATE ADVOCATE: BRUNDIGE, EUGENE UNION ADVOCATE: BNA CODES: 119.01 Promotions-Selection In General 119.1221 Promotions-Ability And Qualifications

SEE GRIEVANCE #34-28-950816-0132-01-09.

ARBITRATION SUMMARY AND AWARD LOG OCB AWARD NUMBER: 1160

OCB GRIEVANCE NUMBER: 34-28-19960122-0006-01-09-

GRIEVANT NAME: PROBST, KAREN L. UNION: OCSEA DEPARTMENT: WORKERS COMP. ARBITRATOR: GRAHAM, HARRY

MANAGEMENT ADVOCATE: BRUNDIGE, EUGENE 2ND CHAIR: UNION ADVOCATE: ARBITRATION DATE: 9/13/1996 DECISION DATE: 9/28/1996 DECISION: GRANTED CONTRACT SECTIONS:

HOLDING:

COST: SUBJECT: ARB SUMMARY #1160

TO: ALL ADVOCATES

FROM: KENNETH COUCH

AGENCY: WORKERS COMP. UNION: OCSEA ARBITRATOR: GRAHAM, HARRY STATE ADVOCATE: BRUNDIGE, EUGENE UNION ADVOCATE: BNA CODES: 119.01 Promotions-Selection In General 119.1223 Promotions-Minimum Qualifications

SEE GRIEVANCE #34-28-950816-01-09.

ARBITRATION SUMMARY AND AWARD LOG OCB AWARD NUMBER: 1160

OCB GRIEVANCE NUMBER: 34-28-19950816-0132-01-09-

GRIEVANT NAME: PROBST, KAREN L. UNION: OCSEA DEPARTMENT: WORKERS COMP. ARBITRATOR: GRAHAM, HARRY

MANAGEMENT ADVOCATE: BRUNDIGE, EUGENE 2ND CHAIR: UNION ADVOCATE: ARBITRATION DATE: 9/13/1996 DECISION DATE: 9/28/1996 DECISION: GRANTED CONTRACT SECTIONS:

HOLDING:

COST: SUBJECT: ARB SUMMARY #1160

TO: ALL ADVOCATES

FROM: KENNETH COUCH

AGENCY: WORKERS COMP. UNION: OCSEA ARBITRATOR: GRAHAM, HARRY STATE ADVOCATE: BRUNDIGE, EUGENE UNION ADVOCATE: BNA CODES: 119.01 Promotions-Selection In General 119.1221 Promotions-Ability And Qualifications

Grievance was sustained.

The union claimed that the grievant was improperly prescreened for the position of Claims Service Representative,PCN 20130.0.

The facts of this case are undisputed. Grievant applied for the position of Claims Service Specialist, PCN 20130.0, in July 1995. After this application was rejected in the prescreening process, she again applied for two other identical vacancies, and subsequently suffered the same result. Grievances were filed after each prescreened rejection, and were consolidated into one for the purposes of arbitration.

Union position: the union claimed that the employer violated Article 17.05 (a) (1) by failing to fill vacancies with the grievant, who possessed the minimum qualifications. First, the union alleged that grievant possessed the necessary undergraduate coursework since the das "minimum qualification conversion table" lists "associate degree" as indicating "equivalence." second, grievant had 36 months experience working in a position equivalent to a claims service representative for a private organization. Prior to her state employment, the grievant worked for six years in two different doctor's offices, dealing with insurance providers, filling out insurance claims for patients, and often worked with BWC staff. Further, since another bargaining unit member had been placed in this position, the union argued that this employee should remain in his position as a Claims Service Specialist.

Employer position: the state does not believe that an associate degree is equivalent to "undergraduate core coursework". Second, the employer believes the phrase "or equivalent position" refers to experience in a private insurance organization, and therefore, grievant's work in a medical office is of little help in the selection process. Further, if the arbitrator decides in the grievant's favor, the proper remedy would simply be to place grievant in the disputed position, with back pay, and return the other employee to his former position.

Decision: first, the grievant had not satisfied the necessary undergraduate core coursework because she did not complete coursework in the appropriate fields of business, humanities, education, social and behavior science that were set out in the minimum qualifications. Second, grievant did meet the minimum qualification of having 36 months experience in a position equivalent to claims service specialist in a private insurance organization. Arbitrator graham found the employer's interpretation of the phrase "or equivalent position" to be "strained, convoluted, tortured and without support in the record or in the english language". Dr. Graham continued: "the state asserts the phrase 'or equivalent position' refers to work in a private insurance organization. There would be no need for the phrase if the state's view were correct. The first sentence of the second paragraph of the minimum class qualification could then read, '36 months experience in private insurance organization as claims representative'. Under the interpretation advanced by the state there is no need for the concluding phrase 'or equivalent position'. That it exists means that the state itself has contemplated and accepted the notion that an applicant may qualify by virtue of experience in a private insurance organization or some other equivalent experience". Since the grievant's experience in the medical office was very similar to those tasks performed by wc claims specialist, the grievant met the equivalency test.

Award: grievance sustained with grievant to be placed in the Claims Service Specialist position at the Bridgeport BWC office retroactive to the award of the position to the other bargaining unit member with appropriate back pay set off by her earnings in her previous position. However, the arbitrator was without the power to direct the state to direct the state to keep the other employee in the same position.

Recommended publications