Source: Instructor S Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning by David Hanson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Source: Instructor S Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning by David Hanson

Chem 160 – K. Marr Strategy Analyst’s Report Team No. Date

Team Members (neatly print your first and last name by your role, below) Rotate roles each week. For teams smaller than four, the roles of spokesperson and strategy analyst or spokesperson and recorder can be combined—your choice! We verify that we all understand the concepts discussed and agree with the solutions to the problems. 1. Manager: ______Actively participates, keeps the team on task, distributes work and responsibilities, assures that all team members participate and understand, resolves disputes 2. Recorder: ______Actively participates, keeps a record of instructions and what the team has done; In consultation with the team prepares the final draft of any written report or assignment or other documentation that will be attached to this sheet 3. Spokesperson: ______Actively participates, shares team’s response in class discussions, presents oral reports to the class that represents the views and conclusions held by the majority of the team 4. Strategy Analyst: ______Actively participates, identifies and keeps a log of problem-solving strategies and methods; Identifies and keeps a log of what the team is doing well, what needs improvement, and insights and discoveries regarding course content and individual and team performance; Prepares the Strategy Analyst’s Report in consultation with the team 5. Homework  Each team member completed the homework assignment: YES NO  If no, use the other side to list the names of the team members that came unprepared and indicate what steps will be taken to get the team member(s) caught up and be better prepared in the future.  Instructor’s initials: ______6. Reflection on Learning (metacognition) Use the other side of this page for your response to the question posted by the instructor. 7. Self-Assessment Use the other side of this page for your response to the question posted by the instructor. 8. Assessment a. Criteria for your self-assessed grade: Did each team member… Yes No make adequate progress in learning/understanding the material? Yes No help others in the team learn/understand the material? Yes No make adequate progress in developing process skills and help others develop process skills? Yes No complete or make adequate progress in completing today’s assignment? Yes No make a positive contribution to today’s activity? Yes No make an equal contribution to today’s activity? Yes No come prepared for class? b. Provide your self-assessed grade for today’s session (3, 4 or 5): ______Instructor’s validation: ______(Instructor’s validation depends on whether the self-assessed grade is reasonable  Acts as a “reward” for realistic/reasonable self-assessment—see the bottom of page 2) c. Instructor’s grade: ______Total grade may vary for different team members based on each individual’s preparation, homework, and participation. d. Instructor’s comments:

e. Total grade: / 10 (Scores above 10 points are possible—see the bottom of page 2 for examples)

9. Attach Recorder’s Report of your team’s work

Page 1 of 2 10. Homework (#5 from page 1)  Each team member completed the homework assignment: YES NO  If no, list the names of the team members that came unprepared and indicate what steps will be taken to get the team member(s) caught up and be better prepared in the future.

Reflection on Learning (#6 from page 1)

Self-Assessment (#7 from page 1)

Examples of Assessment Grades

Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Team’s self-assessment grade (3, 4 3 4 5 3 4 5 4 or 5) Instructor’s validation (depends on if self-assessment score is 3 4 5 0 0 0 0 reasonable/realistic) Instructor’s grade 3 4 5 2 3 4 3 Total Grade 9/10 11/10* 12/10* 5/10 7/10 9/10 7/10 * Explanations  If a team’s self-assessment grade is realistic as in examples 1-3, then the instructor’s validation score is that of the team’s self-assessment grade.  The maximum possible grade is 12/10 (i.e. teams are rewarded for realistic self-assessment)  A total grade of 11/10 is assigned to scores of 12/10 (ex. #2, above, an example of good teamwork and realistic self-assessment)  A total grade of 12/10 is assigned to scores of 15/10 (ex. #3, above, an example of excellent teamwork and realistic self-assessment)  If a team’s self-assessment grade is unrealistically high or low, then the team will not receive any instructor validation points (examples 4-7)—i.e. teams are only rewarded for realistic self-assessment.

Acknowledgement: Adapted from Appendix F of the Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning by David Hanson Page 2 of 2

Recommended publications