Javascript Must Be Enabled on Your Web Browser

Javascript must be enabled on your web browser. Fields marked with * are mandatory.

INSPIRE Annex II+III Data Specification Testing Report

*Testing Slovak environmental agency coordinator

Testing Contact Point Martin *Name

*Surname Koska (Family name)

*e-mail [email protected]

*Tel. +4210917425029

Fax +4210484133635

*What kind of Feasibility Testing test would you like to report? Fitness for purpose testing

How many other organanisations participated in the testing? 1 You will be asked to provide the name and role of each organisaion

*Name of organisation 1 By typing the first letters of the organisation name you will be prompted with the names of organisations State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak already registered in the Republic INSPIRE SDIC/LMO database. However you can also also enter the name of an organisation not registered in the INSPIRE database

DATA PROVIDER

INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER

*Role of organisation DATA MAPPER 1 in the testing Please select any that apply DATA TRANSFORMER

OTHER If you selected "OTHER" please specify Feasibility Testing Step 1/4

Feasibility Testing Description

*Methodology * Study of INSPIRE data specifications used in the * Identification of relevant local datasets testing * Preparation of data for mapping (Prepara Short description of the * Mapping of input datasets to target INSPI methodology/process * Transformation used in the testing

*Description of Oracle spatial, Snow flake Go Publisher 1. software and tools used in the testing Short description of software and tools used in the testing

*How many 3 source/input datasets did you use in the testing. For each dataset you will be asked to provide the following information: Dataset name, description, URL and URL for metadata and data

Feasibility Testing Step 2/4

Source dataset description (Dataset 1)

You have already entered this dataset.

*Dataset Name Bio-geographical regions (Bio-geographical_regions.shp) Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset) Example: Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony) *Dataset description Bio-geographical regions of Slovak republic Short description of the input dataset used in the testing Example: Biogeographical regions of Slovakia

URL for Metadata If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the input dataset Example: http://geo.enviroportal.sk/catalog-client/Query/ShowCSWInfo.do? fileIdentifier=20a8a601-d3f8-4429-be24-6ca73d929fb3

URL for Dataset Data attached to the report If the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide the dataset URL here Example: http://nipi.sazp.sk/arcgis/services/naturesdiplus/naturesdiplus/MapServer/WFSServe r

*Dataset Name Habitats and biotopes (Habitats_and_biotopes.shp) Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset) Example: Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony)

*Dataset description Example of Habitats and biotopes dataset (Biotop 6240) Short description of the input dataset used in the testing Example: Biogeographical regions of Slovakia

*Dataset Name Species distribution (Species_distribution.shp) Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset) Example: Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony)

*Dataset description Example of Species distribution dataset (Ursus arctos, Lynx lynx, Lutra lutra) Short description of the input dataset used in the testing Example: Biogeographical regions of Slovakia

Feasibility Testing Step 3/4 *Which INSPIRE Themes did ANNEX 2 you test?

Please select the theme(s) tested. Elevation

Annex I themes are also listed so that you can report testing results related to inter-connections between Annex I and Land cover Annex II+III themes.

On the next page you will be able to associate your input datasets to the selected themes Orthoimagery

Geology

ANNEX 3

Statistical units

Buildings

Land use

Human health and safety

Utility and governmental services

Environmental monitoring Facilities

Production and industrial facilities

Agricultural and aquaculture facilities

Population distribution and demography

Area management/restriction/regulation zones & reporting units

Natural risk zones

Atmospheric conditions

Meteorological geographical features

Oceanographic geographical features

Sea regions

Bio-geographical regions

Habitats and biotopes

Species distribution

Energy Resources

Mineral Resources

ANNEX 1

Coordinate reference systems

Geographical grid systems

Geographical names

Administrative units

Addresses

Cadastral parcels

Transport networks

Hydrography

Protected sites

Feasibility Testing Step 4/4 Bio-geographical regions

Bio-geographical regions (Bio-geographical_regions.shp)

*Which datasets did you use to test Habitats and biotopes (Habitats_and_biotopes.shp) this theme ?

Species distribution (Species_distribution.shp)

*Select the application schema(s) used for testing Bio-geographicalRegions *Feasibility of the transformation

Fully feasible (It was possible to transform all relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and their attributes/relationships) into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas, and all transformed objects are compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of attributes).

Partly feasible (Some of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schema and/or some of the transformed objects are not fully compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of attributes)).

Not feasible (None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas.)

If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on the end of this webform

Filled Matching Tables

*What are the Transformed datasets/services feasibility testing outcomes? Other If you selected "OTHER" please specify GML 3.2.1 Dataset re

*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing? For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information: Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset 1 *Name DATASET/SERVICE 1 Title of the dataset/service (including the local name Remove Source Dataset of the dataset/service) Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony) BR (br.gml)

*Description Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing) Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions Bio-geographical regions of Slovak republ of Slovakia

URL for Metadata If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the output dataset/service

URL for Dataset If possible and the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide a URL for directly accessing the output dataset Attached to the report

Habitats and biotopes

*Select the application schema(s) used for testing HabitatsAndBiotopes

HabitatsAndBiotopes Implementation *Feasibility of the transformation

Not feasible (None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas.) If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on the end of this webform

*What are the feasibility testing Filled Matching Tables outcomes? Transformed datasets/services

Other If you selected "OTHER" please specify GML 3.2.1 Dataset re

*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing? For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information: Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset 1

*Name DATASET/SERVICE 1 Title of the dataset/service (including the local name Remove Source Dataset of the dataset/service) Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony) HB (hb.gml)

*Description Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing) Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions Example of Habitats and biotopes dataset of Slovakia

Species distribution

*Select the application schema(s) used for testing SpeciesDistribution SpeciesDistribution Implementation *Feasibility of the transformation

Not feasible (None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas.)

If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on the end of this webform

Filled Matching Tables

*What are the Transformed datasets/services feasibility testing outcomes? Other If you selected "OTHER" please specify GML 3.2.1 Dataset re

*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing? For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information: Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset 1 *Name DATASET/SERVICE 1 Title of the dataset/service (including the local name Remove Source Dataset of the dataset/service) Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony) SD (sd.gml)

*Description Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing) Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions Example of Species distribution dataset (U of Slovakia

Costs and Benefits related to the feasibility testing

If possible please 2 specify the effort Training / Studying the Data Specifications (DS) required for each area of the feasibility Identifying and collecting relevat input data sets 2 testing activities Specify the effort in person Creating the mapping rules (e.g. matching tables) 2 days for the whole testing period Setting up the testing infrastructure 0

Executing the data transformation 2

Validating the testing results 0

Documenting the testing results 0

Management and coordination of testing 0

Total 8 Person days

Please describe the benefits identified during the feasibility testing for your institution (partners, testing group)

INSPIRE Annex II+III testing comments

Comments file Testing results file