REVIEW of a scientific or an expert paper received by the editorial board of THE BULLETIN OF THE SLOVENIAN ARMED FORCES or THE MILITARY EDUCATION JOURNAL

1 IDENTIFICATION DATA

1.1 Title of the paper

1.2 Name and surname of the author, institution (we give each author a cipher)

1.3 Name and surname of the reviewer, institution

1.4 Date of receipt of the paper for a review

2 DETERMINING THE EXPERT FIELD YES NO 2.1 The paper belongs to the military science field 2.2 The paper belongs to the military and technical science field 2.3 The paper from other scientific fields is transferred to the military field

3 PAPER FORMATION 3.1 Distinguishing characteristics of the paper 1.1 Title(s) of the paper YES NO - only the actual title of the paper - subtitle of the paper 3.1.2 Abstract - the paper has an abstract in Slovene - the abstract is properly written

3.2 Main text of the paper YES NO 3.2.1 The paper includes the following mandatory components: purpose of the paper, references, attitude towards the previous work, description of the method, techniques, outcomes and discussions. 3.2.2 Written expression in compliance with the standards .- standard notation - the measurements are written in Slovene - names, symbols and a special nomenclature are properly presented - numeric records for dates and time are correct - citations are correct - bibliographic descriptions in references and/or bibliography are correct

3.3 Other components of the paper 3.3.1 Papers originally written for a different purpose YES NO

- the paper is adapted, adopted, translated, - the initial use of the paper is adequately indicated - the variant of the adoption or a translation is properly marked 3.3.2 The drawings (illustrations) and the tables (spread-sheets) YES NO - the drawings and/or tables are adequately marked - the illustrations and/or tables are adequately described - in the text the author refers to the illustrations and/or tables

3.3.3 Appendixes YES NO - the paper has appendixes - the appendixes are adequately placed after the references - the appendixes are adequately marked - the contents of the appendixes is appropriate

3.3.4 Extracts from other works YES NO - the paper includes a longer extract (or extracts) from the works of other authors - the author has suitable permit for the publication of such an extract

3.4 Style YES NO - adequate language expression - adequate terminology - complying with the demands of the scientific style of expression - appropriate formation of paragraphs, sections and chapters - appropriate use of nonverbal means (illustrations and tables)

4 PAPER CONTENT YES NO 4.1 Originality and freshness of the - original issue treated topic - unoriginal issue, repetition and confirmation of other researches - broadening of the topic with some original components - an overview of the discipline in a certain area - scientific (not a research) topic - the treated topic is up to date and important

YES NO 4.2 Copyright (the author is - the demarcation between the author’s anonymous and the reviewer contribution and the contribution of other tries to evaluate only the author’s authors is clearly defined in the text contribution) - the author’s contribution to the treated issue is disputable/not proven

YES NO 4.3 Content overview - the title(s) correspond(s) to the contents of the paper - the title gives enough information and contains key words - the purpose of the paper is clearly defined - the attitude towards the previous works is adequately described - the methods and techniques used are reliable - the description of the methods and techniques gives enough detail that the 2 research/expert work can be repeated - the amount of the listed data is sufficient - the argumentation is clear and convincing - the description of the outcomes contains mistakes (typewrite and similar) - the outcomes are accompanied by comments and critiques - the conclusion includes a summary of previous thesis, their synthesis - the answer to the initial hypothesis - the bibliography must be supplemented or enlarged

4.4 Accuracy of the outcomes accurate disputable not accurate

5 CLASSIFICATION OF THE PAPER TYPE - original scientific paper - review paper - short scientific article - professional article - review, book review, critique - polemics, discussion paper - interview - popular article - other papers and essays

6 REVIEWER’S SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS AND ARGUMENTATIONS ADD BELOW

7 RECOMMENDATION FOR THE EDITORIAL BOARD - publication recommended (without modifications) - publication conditional (after the author modifies the paper in accordance with the reviewer’s demands) - paper not suitable for publishing in the Slovenian Armed Forces publication

Place and date

Signature of the reviewer

3