Individual Ethics and Cultural Characteristics in Predicting Computer Abuse

APPENDIX 2. ANALYSIS SUPPORT

Note to editor and reviewer: This appendix is intended as an online supplementary appendix to support the review process and hopefully the eventually published paper. It is not intended for publication with the print version; however, if you deem portions of this appendix to be crucial for the print version, please let us know.

Table A2.1 Outer Item Weights

Items CA CA t- Collectivis Collectivis Individualis Individualis Utilitaria Utilitarian Formalis Formalism weigh statistics m weights m t- m weights m t-statistics n weights t-statistics m weights t-statistics ts statistics caa1 0.705 10.92*** caa2 0.709 13.77*** caa3 0.714 14.03*** caa4 0.497 9.09*** caa5 0.686 15.68*** caa6 0.636 13.48*** caa7 0.765 19.44*** caa8 0.778 21.28*** caa9 0.711 19.20*** Col1 0.773 21.45*** Col2 0.855 32.18*** Col3 0.593 9.13*** Col4 0.855 33.49*** Col5 0.370(d) 3.44*** Col6 0.323(d) 2.83** Col7 0.367(d) 3.22** Col8 0.701 18.21*** ic6 0.742 3.99*** ic7 0.645 3.31** ic8 0.937 4.25*** Util1 0.641 14.96*** Util2 0.781 22.87*** Individual Ethics and Cultural Characteristics in Predicting Computer Abuse

Util3 0.835 32.79*** Util4 0.648 13.18*** Util5 0.778 25.95*** Util6 0.773 24.57*** Util7 0.676 14.55*** Form1 0.739 20.14*** Form2 0.654 14.90*** Form3 0.657 16.04*** Form4 0.743 21.77*** Form5 0.762 20.00*** Form6 0.751 15.50***

***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 , (d)=dropped because weights were much lower than other related weights

2 Individual Ethics and Cultural Characteristics in Predicting Computer Abuse

Table A2.2. Cross-Loadings from Confirmatory Factor Analysis in PLS

Items CA Collectivism Individualism Formalism Utilitarianism caa1 0.695 -0.132 0.092 -0.201 -0.152 caa2 0.712 -0.141 0.128 -0.204 -0.118 caa3 0.719 -0.204 0.009 -0.244 -0.198 caa4 0.509 -0.084 -0.021 -0.057 -0.101 caa5 0.694 -0.220 0.055 -0.246 -0.171 caa6 0.641 -0.204 0.056 -0.155 -0.114 caa7 0.761 -0.221 0.161 -0.283 -0.190 caa8 0.774 -0.146 0.157 -0.219 -0.070 caa9 0.718 -0.301 0.038 -0.180 -0.197 Col1 -0.211 0.784 -0.116 0.381 0.321 Col2 -0.232 0.851 0.000 0.395 0.322 Col3 -0.103 0.584 0.033 0.210 0.192 Col4 -0.272 0.855 -0.017 0.375 0.328 Col8 -0.186 0.705 0.105 0.336 0.402 ic6 0.052 0.055 0.730 -0.042 0.241 ic7 0.018 0.118 0.628 0.034 0.307 ic8 0.134 -0.047 0.948 -0.103 0.078 Form1 -0.196 0.369 -0.010 0.662 0.482 Form2 -0.251 0.291 -0.101 0.741 0.453 Form3 -0.225 0.345 -0.076 0.760 0.327 Form4 -0.241 0.279 -0.080 0.749 0.270 Form5 -0.186 0.346 -0.014 0.743 0.469 Form6 -0.193 0.364 -0.078 0.661 0.366 Util1 -0.083 0.294 0.207 0.293 0.648 Util2 -0.143 0.287 0.103 0.402 0.783 Util3 -0.194 0.356 0.037 0.496 0.775 Util4 -0.120 0.257 0.335 0.266 0.678 Util5 -0.182 0.310 0.072 0.453 0.783 Util6 -0.222 0.359 0.076 0.474 0.834 Util7 -0.061 0.262 0.245 0.267 0.652

3 Individual Ethics and Cultural Characteristics in Predicting Computer Abuse

Table A2.3. Assessing Common Method Bias through Common Method Factor Approach

Construct Item Substantive Variance Method Variance Factor explained Factor Explained Loading (λs2) Loading (λm2) (λs) (λm)

Collectivism c1 0.853 0.728 -0.014 0.000 c2 0.743 0.552 -0.153 0.023 c3 0.838 0.702 0.006 0.000 c4 0.758 0.575 0.021 0.000 c5 0.619 0.383 0.124 0.015 Computer abuse ca1 0.690 0.476 0.024 0.001 ca2 0.735 0.540 0.042 0.002 ca3 0.674 0.454 -0.070 0.005 ca4 0.624 0.389 0.085 0.007 ca5 0.638 0.407 -0.070 0.005 ca6 0.694 0.482 0.028 0.001 ca7 0.686 0.471 -0.063 0.004 ca8 0.848 0.719 0.110 0.012 ca9 0.679 0.461 -0.075 0.006 Formalism f1 0.527 0.278 0.183 0.033 f2 0.689 0.475 0.044 0.002 f3 0.833 0.694 -0.099 0.010 f4 0.870 0.757 -0.173 0.030 f5 0.745 0.555 0.029 0.001 f6 0.639 0.408 0.039 0.002 Individualism i1 0.860 0.740 0.020 0.000 i2 0.830 0.689 0.107 0.011 i3 0.785 0.616 -0.130 0.017 Utilitarianism u1 0.795 0.632 -0.105 0.011 u2 0.702 0.493 0.080 0.006 u3 0.670 0.449 0.147 0.022 u4 0.889 0.790 -0.195 0.038 u5 0.792 0.627 -0.023 0.001 u6 0.559 0.312 0.204 0.042 u7 0.829 0.687 -0.122 0.015 AVERAGES 0.736 54.14% 0.000 1.07%