Name of Form s3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Construction Contractor Evaluation
Company Name: Contractor Project Mgr.
Date: Project No. Project Name
Trade Performed: General Specialty(note (check all that apply) type):______Contract Type: Stipulated Sum Continuing Services Other (check all that apply)
Please rate the effectiveness of the Contractor’s performance on the capital improvement project across the following dimensions:
Evaluation criteria: 5= Met Expectations 4= Achieved Project Objectives 3= Good 2=Below 1= Did Not Meet Expectations N/A
Contractor Performance Dimensions: Value Score 1) Expertise, knowledge and Dedicated, experienced people for duration 1-5 experience of project. 2) Commitment to University Provided best effort on MBE/WBE and 1-5 Guidance apprentice utilization. 3) Problem solving and decision Provided effective & creative problem making solving coordination & fair decision making 1-5 on project. 4) Timeliness and Responsiveness Performed responsibilities, coordination & provided information/documentation in a 1-5 timely manner. 5) Process facilitation, Effective project documentation & communication and partnering communication in facilitating a successful 1-5 project. 6) Scope Management Identified issues & effectively managed 1-5 changes within project. 7) Schedule Management Effectively managed/coordinated project schedule to complete milestones and 1-5 project on time. 8) Budget Management Offered valuable input to owners for 1-5 managing project on budget. 9) Quality Management Performed quality construction in a safe 1-5 manner through demonstrated Quality
Please send completed form to Administrative Coordinator, Dee Powers, at [email protected] or 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8034, St. Louis, MO 63110. Rev. 2-16-16 Assurance. 10) Risk Management Provided prompt notification and effective 1-5 action in managing/balancing project risks 11) Overall Project Management Delivered effective overall project 1-5 management for owners. 12) Invoice/pay application Invoices/pay applications were received on 1-5 timeliness time. 13) Invoice/pay application Invoices/pay applications were correct and 1-5 accuracy vendor provided all required backup. 14) Invoice/pay application Vendor responded in a timely manner to all 1-5 corrections/additions corrections/additional information. Total
Based on these comments, would you recommend this Contractor for comparable work in the future? Yes No Please provide any comments regarding the Contractor’s performance or the quality of its work. Comments:
Evaluator’s Name: Telephone Number: Department:______Email: ______