Annex 2: Paps PAF INDICATORS 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annex 2: Paps PAF INDICATORS 2006

Annex 2: PAPs PAF INDICATORS 2006 Objectives Activities No. Indicators Target

1 % of GBS in total PAPs aid flows disbursed to the 40% GBS Portfolio GoM. Composition 2 % of program aid in total PAPs aid disbursed to the 70% Program Aid GoM. 3 % of PAPs with multi-year agreements of not less 100% Commitment of than 3 years. funds 4 Commitments of GBS for year n+1 within 4 weeks 100% Predictability of the JR in year n 5 Disbursement of confirmed GBS commitment in 100% the fiscal year for which it was scheduled, Disbursement according to precise quarterly disbursement schedule agreed with GoM 6 PAPs adhere strictly to GBS common 95% conditionality. 7 (a) number of PAPs not having Annex 10 7(a) 13 Consolidation exceptions; 7(b) 2 and harmonization (b) number of PAPs significantly reducing of conditionality annex 10 exceptions with a view to eliminating such exceptions. 8 Strict harmonization between all new bilateral 100% agreements and MoU 9 % of PAPs aid flows to the government reported to 80% the budget 10 % of PAPs aid flows to the government included in 45% the Treasury payment system 11 % of PAPs aid flows to government using public 45% procurement systems 12 Implementation and evaluation reports required by Review Harmonization the PAP from the government outside established reporting and Alignment normal government reporting systems are requirements in eliminated (excluding projects, which have their Health, own reporting system; and audits). Education and Agriculture Utilization of 13 Significantly reduce the overall number of No. of GBS government missions for evaluation and appraisal undertaken missions outside systems and by officials of donor countries involving meetings JR & MYR < 7 reporting with government officials, AND significantly No. of non-GBS increase the share of those missions that are joint. missions < 160 Share of joint missions: 20% 14 Analytical work at country level related to In line with development, implementation and impact GoM priorities: evaluation of government programs and policies 80% AND involving government officials is undertaken Joint: 50% jointly with other donors and in line with government priorities and strategies. 15 Donors agree and implement “quiet period” with Reach GoM. Agreement and Implement Extension of 16 Share of sector and provincial aid with a MoU MoU for Health, predictability Sector and moving towards the same rules of predictability Education and and alignment Provincial Aid and alignment as defined above. Agriculture

17 Reach agreement on guidelines for national Reach Agreement Technical capacity development support in line with cooperation government priorities and strategies, and subsequently adhere to it. Capacity 18 PAPs and GoM agree on a system and format of ODAMOZ data Building information about aid programs and flows to the base adjusted, Transparent GoM, which is feasible, accurate, timely and and transition flow of useful for statistical, analytical and policy work, towards information and subsequently adhere to it. ownership and management by the GoM started. Annex 5 (B) Ranking Table: Indicators and points for the Individual PAPs Objectives Activities No.1 Indicators Target Points

1 % of GBS in total PAPs aid flows disbursed to the Portfolio GBS 40% 5 Composition GoM. (25% of total 2 % of program aid in total PAPs aid disbursed to the Program Aid 70% 5 points) GoM. 3 % of PAPs with multi-year agreements of not less 100% 4 Commitment of than 3 years. funds 4 Commitments of GBS for year n+1 within 4 weeks Predictability 100% 4 of the JR in year n (35% of total points) 5 Disbursement of confirmed GBS commitment in the fiscal year for which it was scheduled, Disbursement 100% 6 according to precise quarterly disbursement schedule agreed with GoM 6 PAPs adhere strictly to GBS common 95% 2 conditionality. 7 (a) number of PAPs not having Annex 10 Consolidation exceptions; and 7(a) 13 2 harmonization (b) number of PAPs significantly reducing 7(b) 2 of conditionality annex 10 exceptions with a view to eliminating such exceptions. 8 Strict harmonization between all new bilateral 100% 2 agreements and MoU 9 % of PAPs aid flows to the government reported to 80% 2 the budget 10 % of PAPs aid flows to the government included in 45% 1 the Treasury payment system 11 % of PAPs aid flows to government using public 45% 1 procurement systems 12 Review Harmonization Implementation and evaluation reports required by reporting and Alignment the PAP from the government outside established requirements in (35% of total normal government reporting systems are 1 Health, points) eliminated (excluding projects, which have their Education and own reporting system; and audits). Agriculture Utilization of government 13 No. of GBS systems and Significantly reduce the overall number of missions outside reporting missions for evaluation and appraisal undertaken JR & MYR < 7 by officials of donor countries involving meetings No. of non-GBS 1 with government officials, AND significantly missions < 160 increase the share of those missions that are joint. Share of joint missions: 20% 14 Analytical work at country level related to development, implementation and impact In line with evaluation of government programs and policies GoM priorities: 1 AND involving government officials is undertaken 80% jointly with other donors and in line with Joint: 50% government priorities and strategies. 15 Donors agree and implement “quiet period” with Respect “quite 1 GoM. period” agreed.

1 The number for each indicator in the ranking matrix is exactly the same as in the PAPs’ PAF matrix. 16 Actively seek to Capacity Reach agreement on guidelines for national promote Building Technical capacity development support in line with agreement about 2 (5% of total cooperation government priorities and strategies, and harmonized and points) subsequently adhere to it. aligned CDS

Recommended publications