Wireless Personal Area Networks s51

11/05/2018 doc: 15-06-0055-18-003c

IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area Networks

Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Title doc.: IEEE-15-06-0055-02-003c (UMD), Draft

Date [18Jan06] Submitted

Source [Ali Sadri] [Intel Corporation, 13290 Evening Voice: [+1 858-774-6202] Creek Drive ,San Diego , CA 92128- FAX: [] 3419 ,USA ] E-Mail: [[email protected]]

Re: Move reference to reference section

Abstract [802.15.3c Usage Model Document]

Purpose This document is intended to provide an outline of viable customer usage models for the 802.15.3c systems. It will suggest specific use cases that are expected to provide a common framework for comparing proposals made in response to the CFP. The models presented here are primarily focused on enabling standard’s success in the marketplace. The UMD is the guide to generate specific well- defined simulation scenarios driven by the Selection Criteria and Channel Modeling documents.

Notice This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.

Release The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

Submission Page 1 Ali S. Sadri 11/05/2018 doc: 15-06-0055-18-003c

Authors/Contributors:

Name Company Address Phone Fax Email

Ali Sadri Intel Intel Corporation, 858- [email protected] Corporation 13290 Evening 774- Creek Drive ,San 6202 Diego , CA 92128- 3419 ,USA

Alireza Philips Philips, 914- [email protected] Seyedi 945- 345 Scarborough 6318 Rd., Briarcliff Manor, NY, 10510

Tony National ICT NICTA, Level 2, +61-2- [email protected] Pollock Australia Nouvelle House, 6125- Limited 216 Northbourne 3797 Ave, Braddon ACT 2612, Australia Kazuaki Panasonic 4-12-4, Higashi- +81- [email protected] Takahashi Shinagawa, 6710- Shinagawa-ku, 2029 Tokyo 140-8507, JAPAN

Raymond Panasonic Blk 1022 Tai Seng [email protected] Yu Zhan Ave. #06-3530 Tai Seng Industrial Estate, Singapore 534415 Ichihiko NTT Network 1-1 Hikarinooka, Phone: [email protected] TOYODA Innovation Yokosuka, +81-46- Laboratories Kanagawa 239- 859- 0847, Japan 2366

Abbie NewLANS 43 Nagog Park 617- [email protected] Mathew 283- Suite 200 1363

Acton, MA 01720

Dr. E. Grass IHP-GmbH Im Tel: Fax: Eckhard Grass [grass@ihp- Technologiepark 25 +49 335 +49 335 microelectronics.com] D-15236 Frankfurt 5625 5625 (Oder) Germany 731 671

Kamran NIST 100 Bureau Drive, 301- [email protected] Sayrafian Stop 8920, 975- Gaithersburg, MD, 5479 20899

Yozo Shoji NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Shuzo Kato NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Ryuhei NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Funada Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Hirokazu NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Sawada Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Hiroshi NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Harada Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Ming Lei NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Yoshinori NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Nishiguchi Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Chang-soon NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Choi Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Fumihide NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Kojima Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Masahiro NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Umehira Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Kenichi SONY 6-7-35 +81-3- +81-3- [email protected] Kawasaki Kitashinagawa, 5795- 5795- Shinagawa-ku, 7879 7385 Tokyo 141-0001, Japan

Hiroyuki Tohoku 2-1-1 Katahira, +81-22- +81-22- [email protected] Nakase University Aoba-ku, Sendai- 217- 217- shi, Miyagi 980- 5531 5533 8577, Japan

Yasuyuki FUJITSU 5-5 Hikarino-Oka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Oishi Yokosuka-shi, 839- 839- Kanagawa 239- 5373 5560 0847, Japan

Yozo Shoji NICT 3-4 Hikarinooka, +81-46- +81-46- [email protected] Yokosuka, 847- 847- Kanagawa 239- 5295 5440 0847, Japan

Abstract

This document defines usage models for 802.15.3c, The UMD, or Usage Model Document, defines the standard’s features, and all other elements which must be defined to enable standard success in the marketplace. The UMD is the guide for the Technical Requirements, and to generate simulation results for specified well-defined simulation scenarios driven by the Selection Criteria and Channel Modelling documents.]

Revision History of Document 15-06-0055 R Comments Date Author e v is i o n R0 Initial version of the Usage Model Document. Changed January 18, 2006 Ali Sadri, name from MRD to UMD IEEE 802.15-06-0055-00-003c Ian C. Gifford R1 Add Draft to Usage Model Document (UMD) to the name January 18, 2006 Ali Sadri IEEE 802.15-06-0055-01-003c R2 Add Contributors list February 1, 2006 Ali Sadri R3 Consolidate comments from A. Seyedi, T. Pollock and K. February 8, 2006 Ali Sadri Takahashi R4 Consolidate comments from T. Pollock and I. TOYODA February 15, 2006 Ali Sadri R5 Consolidate comments from CFA doeument in to usage March 1, 2006 Ali Sadri models, Include comments from Abbie and Raymond R6 Incorporated the applications tables and converged in to March 9, 2006 Ali Sadri one table. Add new table to include the MAC systems attribute, expand the simulations scenarios, Updated applications parameter definition table. R7 Incorporated comments from Eckhard Grass on the MAC March 22, 2006 Ali Sadri attributes for Application #29 Revise table 4, applications, and combine several applications in to similar categories. The same category applications are color coded similarly R8 Regroup Applications, Re-label applications to new March 29, 2006 Ali Sadri applications name, add applications parameter definition, The new Application list is reduced to 7 applications, A1- A7. The description of the applications is the Use Cases for the applications. R9 Agreed to keep the application as A1-A7, Created sample April 13, 2006 Ali Sadri Use Case for HD streaming and Wireless Desktop R10 Update Contributor list with Abbie Mathews contact April 26, 2006 Ali Sadri information, Added use case for video streaming R11 Reformat the Use Case table 6 and add new use cased. The May 10, 2006 Ali Sadri new table includes the attributes of the use case, including separation, motion, TX and RX location and data content R12 Updated applications table, use cases table May 17, 2006 Ali Sadri R13 Ranking Use case table, Ranking available in a separate May 17, 2006 Ali Sadri table R14 Remove “Multiple Stream” definition from applications May 18, 2006 Ali Sadri table R15 Add Usage Model to the appendix section of the document Aug. 30, 2006 Ali Sadri R16 Update with approved Usage models, UM1-UM5, Scoring Nov. 16, 2006 Ali Sadri and Ranking, Mandatory and Optional UM for simulations and selection purposes

R17 Update with Kamran’s comments and Editorial comments. January 15, 2007 Ali Sadri Add Glossary R18 Editorial comments January 15, 2007 Ali Sadri

GLOSSARY

AV: Audio-Video BER: Bit Error Rate CER: Character error rate CM: Channel Model DEV: Device DV : Digital-Video DVD: Digital Versatile Disc HD: High Definition HDD: Hard Disk Drive HDMI: High-Definition Multimedia Interface HDTV: High Definition Television LOS: Line of Sight MAC: Medium Access Control MSDU: MAC Service Data Unit NLOS: Non Line of Sight P2MP: Point-to-Multipoint PDA: Personal Digital Assistant PER: Packet Error Rate PMP: Portable Media Player STB: Set Top Box TX/RX: Transmitter/Receiver UM: Usage Model USB: Universal Serial Bus WB: Wireless Bridge WPAN: Wireless Personal Area Network

TERMINALOGIES:  Device discovery o Procedure by which a device identifies devices within its potential radio proximity  Automatic Device Discovery o Procedure by which a device identifies devices within its potential radio proximity without user intervention  Isochronous o Transmission in which the time interval separating any two corresponding transitions is equal to the unit interval or to a multiple of the unit interval.  Asynchronous

o Is the sending of data blocks, for example symbols, characters or data packets, at any point in time, using variable time interval separating the transmission of the blocks.  Latency o The time from when a packet is delivered to the TX MAC to the time that the packet is recovered from the RX MAC  Multiple nearby data transmission or reception o Multiple transmitters and receivers device operating at the same time within the potential radio proximity of others

1 Introduction To support the definition of the mmWave higher throughput WPAN standard (which will define a new PHY and incorporate changes to MAC if needed to support the PHY) within the IEEE, this document attempts to define usage models based on various market-based use-cases. The usage models are intended to support the definitions of simulations that will allow 802.15 members to evaluate the performance of various proposals in terms of, for example, network throughput, delay, packet loss and other metrics. It is intended that the outputs of this document will aid in the subsequent development of the evaluation and selection criteria used by 802.15.3c.

Note - These usage models that the usage model committee develops here are subject to the following constraints: 1. They are relevant to the expected uses of the technology 2. They require higher throughput than can be achieved with existing 802.15 and similar technologies 3. They are capable of being turned into an unambiguous simulation scenario 2 Process going forward The 802.15.3c Usage Model Document committee has been given responsibility for maintaining this document.

3 Definitions This section defines some of the terms used in this document.

Application – A source or sink of wireless data that relates to a particular type of user activity. Examples: Streaming video, Wireless Display, High Capacity disc drive synchronization.

Environment – The type of place where a WPAN, or short range wireless communications system, is deployed. Examples: residential, office, desktop.

Use Case – A use case is a description of how an end user interacts with a system that exercises a particular deployment of a WPAN.. A use case includes an Application in a deployment Environment with details regarding the user activity and both sides of the link and the range at which the application should operate. Examples: Watching a television physically remote from the cable or set-top box within the home.

Usage Model – A specification of one or more applications and environments from which a simulation scenario can be created once the traffic patterns of the applications are known. Usage Models are created to "cover" Use Cases.

Simulation Scenario – A simulation scenario is a description of a usage model that supports simulation. A simulation scenario includes details needed for simulation. Types of details to be included are descriptions that link the usage model to the simulation scenario:

 Environment linked to a channel model,  Position of the transmitters and receivers,  Data traffic for all applications,  Number of users on the same frequency band channel. A Simulation Scenario is created from a Usage Model by characterizing the traffic profile of the Applications and possibly of merging multiple Applications together to reduce simulation time.

4 Mappings between Application, Environment, Channel Model, Use case, Usage Model and Simulation Scenario

Understanding and defining the Application, Environment, and channel model, Use Case, Usage Model and Simulation Scenario are all necessary to create comparative results from 802.15.3c proposals.

Channel models have been defined in doc: 15-06-0195-06-003c.

Each use case involves the use of one Application and is defined for one or more Environments. It represents a single type of use of a system using the technology.

Each Application reflects a source or sink of data. They will eventually be characterized in terms of a traffic profile that allows a simulation of the Application to be created.

Each Usage Model contains a representative mixture of Applications and channel models designed to adequately cover the selected Use Cases. There is a many to many mapping between Use Cases and Usage Models (i.e., the same Use Case may contribute to multiple Usage Models and the same Usage Model may include Applications from multiple Use Cases).

There will be a one-to-one mapping between Usage Models and Simulation Scenarios. The usage model is a marketing-oriented description of a "reasonable mixture" covering the important use cases. The simulation scenario fills in any technical details necessary to fully define the simulation inputs not present in the usage model. Following demonstrates the I/O of the UMD

Applications (Traffic profile)

Environments (Channel Models) Performance Node Deployment (Relative Usage position of the TX & RX) Evaluation Model Metrics Number of users on the same WPAN channel

Simulation Scenario The output of the above diagram provides a set of performance evaluation metrics as specified in the selection criteria document.

5 Environments Following is the list of environment and its definitions and how it maps to the channel models. Table 1 - Environment to Channel Model Mapping Channel Model Scenario Environment Descriptions Typical home with multiple rooms and furnished with CM1 LOS furniture, TV sets lounges, etc. The size is comparable to the small office room. The walls/floor are made of concrete or wood covered by wallpaper/carpet. There Residential are also windows and wooden door in different rooms within the residential environment.

CM2 NLOS

Typical office setup furnished with multiple chairs, desks, computers and work stations. Bookshelves, CM3 LOS cupboards and whiteboards are also interspersed within the environment. The walls are made by metal or concrete covered by plasterboard or carpet with Office windows and door on at least one side of the office. Cubical, laboratory, open and closed office can be CM4 treated as a generic office. Typically these offices are NLOS linked by long corridors. Typical small size library with multiple desks, chairs CM5 LOS and metal bookshelves. Bookshelves are filled with books, magazines, etc. Some tables and chairs were Library interspersed between the bookshelves. At least one side of room has windows and/or door. The walls are CM6 NLOS made of concrete.

CM7 LOS Desktop Typical office desktop and computer clutter. CM8 NLOS Partitioning surrounded this environment

6 Applications Table 3 lists the applications that are referred to from the usage models, together with relevant traffic parameters.

The parameters required to define the application are defined in Table 2.

Table 2 - Application Parameter Definitions Parameter Definition MSDU size Packet size at the top of the MAC Maximum PER Maximum packet error rate at the top of the MAC. This is defined by the error rate that can be tolerated by the application. Maximum Delay Maximum transport delay at the top of the MAC Data Type Indicates the data type of the applications. It takes one of two values: asynchronous or isochronous.

These two types are intended to represent a request for a total amount of channel time and a request for channel time on a periodic basis that does not expire. Asymmetry Yes, NO. Asymmetric applications typically have significantly different offered loads in different direction. e.g. Wireless HDMI Maximum Maximum data rate required by application. Offered Load

Table 3 - Application Definitions # Application MAX Data MSDU PER/ Delay Asymmetry Load Type (B) BER (ms) (Gbps) A1.0 HD Video Streaming 0.05-3.0 I ? ?? BER ? Yes 10-11 A1.1 0.05-2.5 ? ? ?

0.1-3.2 A1.2 1 A1.3 1 A1.4 A2.0 0.1-2.0 A 1500 BER 10-6 N/A No File Transfer Octets A2.1 0.1-2.0 ? ? ?

0.1-3.2 A2.2 A3 Wireless Docking 0.05-4.0 I/A ? For I same For I Yes station and Desktop as A1 same P2MP For A, as A1 same as For A, A2 same as A2 A4 Gaming 0.05-1 I ? ? 25ms No

Same as Low No A5 A, 1500 Shortrange Backhaul 0.156-2.5 A2 need a clarify Octets # 1500 Same as ?? No A6 Ad-hoc 0.1-1.6 A Octets A2 Same as Same No 0.5-1.0 1518 A7 Wireless Gb Ethernet A A2 as A5 Octets

7 Use Cases

Table 4 contains a definition of the use cases used in this document. Table 4 - Use Case Definitions U# Application Covered by Separation LOS/NLOS TX Position RX Position Motion Content Score Channel Model # (m) 3= high 2=mid 1=Low U1 A1 Residential 5-10 There could The transmitter sits onThe receiver sits Fixed, Uncompressed 2.82 Uncompressed be a wall a shelf near or under somewhere near the Video and Video between the the STB or AV TV Link may be Audio Streaming TX and RX receiver There may be two temporarily There may be two units at each end shadowed by units at each end spaced about 1m apartHuman Body spaced about 1m apartfor diversity for diversity U17 A7 Office 3-5m LOS Transmitter/receiver Transmitter/receiver Fixed Ethernet traffic 2.81 Gigabit Conference Room is and access point is a portable device Ethernet Library located near the (e.g. laptop) located ceiling on a desk U16 A6 Ad-hoc Office 3-5m LOS Transmitter/receiver Transmitter/receiver Fixed Ethernet traffic 2.70 Conference Room is a portable device is a portable device Library (e.g. laptop) located (e.g. laptop) located Desktop on a desk on a desk U5 A2 Office 1-3 NLOS / Transmitter next or Transmitter next or Fixed Email, news, 2.64 File Transfer Desktop LOS close to the receiver close to the receiver chat, printing, and synch 2 fixed device 2 fixed device small and Large music and video contents and files downloading and synchronization U6 A2 Desktop 1-3m LOS/NLOS The The Fixed Email, news, 2.61 File Transfer Office transmitter/receiver is transmitter/receiver is chat, printing, and synch a portable device a PC placed on the small and Large (PDA or PMP) and is desk. music and video placed on the table in contents and

front of or next to the files computing device downloading and synchronization U2 A1 Conference room 10-20 LOS The transmitter is The receiver is Fixed, Uncompressed 2.57 Uncompressed located on or near the mounted on or close Video and Video presenter’s podium, to the ceiling and it Audio Streaming It is connected to a (the receiver) is laptop or a connected to a HD multimedia server projector, which illuminates a large screen U3 A1 Residential 3-5m LOS/NLOS The transmitter is a The receiver sits Fixed, Uncompressed 2.52 Uncompressed portable device (PDA somewhere near the Video and Video or PMP) and is placedTV Link may be Audio Streaming on the table in front ofThere may be two temporarily or next to the TV. units at each end shadowed by spaced about 1m apartHuman Body for diversity U11 A3 Desktop 1-3 NLOS Transmitter in the Same Device is jittered Wide range of 2.52 Wireless Office drawer or in a cabinet during Data rates from Desktop beneath the monitor transmission such BT rate to HD Receiver on the desk as handheld in Streaming video or next to the laptop hand or laptop on lap U7 A2 Office 1-3m LOS The The receiver is a Fixed Large music and2.50 File Transfer Conference Room transmitter/receiver is portable device (PDA, video contents and synch * a kiosk in a store PMP, digital camera) and files placed next to the kiosk U9 A2 Residential 0.1-1 LOS TX/RX near AV TX/RX is associated Fixed during Large/Small 2.43 File Transfer Office recorder, Kiosk or with portable device transferring video contents associated with and files portable device. downloading and uploading U14 A5 Corridor 20-30m LOS The transmitter and The transmitter and Fixed Gig E or similar 2.42 Short range receiver are connectedreceiver are connected traffic Backhaul to the wall or ceiling to the wall or ceiling in a corridor in a corridor

U10 A3 Office 1-3 NLOS Transmitter on the Receiver in the Fixed Single high 2.31 Wireless Desktop desk drawer throughput Docking station connection from Laptop to the docking station U4 A1 Residential 0.1-1 LOS Transmitter near AV Receiver is associated Fixed during Video and 2.25 Video player or associated with portable device streaming Audio Streaming with portable device

U13 A4 Residential 1-3m LOS Transmitter is a hand- The receiver is placed Jittered (hand Interactive 2.10 Mobile Gaming held device (e.g. near a TV movement) Video mobile phone)

U8 A2 Office 3-5m LOS/NLOS The transmitter is a The receiver is a Fixed Files, “byte 2.07 File Transfer PC or a portable printer located stream” device placed on a elsewhere in the room desk U15 A5 AWGN 200-300 LOS Transmitter on Pole Transmitter on Pole Fixed, jitter due to Gig E 2.00 Short range top or on a tower or top or on a tower or wind equivalent data Backhaul outdoor on the wall outdoor on the wall Professionally Receiver on Pole top Receiver on Pole top installed or on a tower or or on a tower or outdoor on the wall outdoor on the wall U12 A4 Residential 1-3 LOS Transmit and receive Transmit and receive Jitter low throughput 1.61 Mobile GamingOffice are held closely to are held closely to Data with low each other each other latency

Use CaseHigh Mid Low High Mid Low TotalAverage Ranked Data 1 10 4 0 13 1 0 28 2.82 17 10 3 0 11 2 0 26 2.81 16 11 2 0 9 4 1 27 2.70 5 10 4 0 9 4 1 28 2.64 6 10 6 0 9 6 0 31 2.61 2 8 6 0 9 4 1 28 2.57 3 8 8 0 7 6 0 29 2.52 11 7 7 0 9 5 1 29 2.52 7 7 7 1 10 4 1 30 2.50 9 9 5 1 6 8 1 30 2.43 14 8 3 2 7 4 2 26 2.42 10 6 6 2 8 4 3 29 2.31 4 9 4 1 2 9 3 28 2.25 13 6 6 3 4 7 4 30 2.10 8 4 8 2 5 5 5 29 2.07 15 5 2 5 5 4 5 26 2.00 12 0 6 8 1 9 4 28 1.61

8 Usage Models

The purpose of these models is to merge representative use cases to create a small number of credible mixtures of applications. The usage models have to be realistic in terms that they are covered by the use cases listed above and different from each other.

The number of usage models needs to be limited because each usage model adds simulation time to the preparation of results for submission against the 802.15.3c selection criteria.

doc.: 15-06-0369-09-003c November 15, 2006 summary-usage-model UM1 Uncompressed Video Streaming

U1/U3 TV Point-to-point PC, uMPC, Set top Box TV or Monitor (STB) Environment Throughput BER/PiER Distance Note MAC SAP NLOS, LOS 1.78 Gbps 10-6 BER for PHY •No data retransmission Simulations 5 required 1.49, W/O Blk Residential *Justification for this •Unidirectional data Stream, Up to transmission noted by (STB-TV) value is needed Solid line 1080i, 24, 60 •Low bitrate reverse link LOS, NLOS 3.56 Gbps 10-6 BER for PHY •Target of 10-9 TMDS Simulations 10 CER for HDMI 2.98, W/O Blk •Pixel is RGB, 24 bits Residential *Justification for this Stream, Up to value is needed (STB-TV) 1080p, 24, 60 Submission Slide 2 Ali Sadri, Intel Corporation

UM2 Option 1,

doc.: 15-06-0369-09-003c November 15, 2006 summary-usage-model UM2 multi Uncompressed Video Streaming U1/U3 TV1

Separated TV or Monitor by 5m PC, uMPC, TV2 Set top Box Point-to-multi-point (STB) Environment Throughput BER/PiER Distance Note MAC SAP Residential TV1: 10-6 BER for PHY •No data retransmission Simulations STB-TV1 required 1.75 Gbps •Unidirectional data *Justification for this TV1:LOS & transmission noted by solid 1.49, W/O Blk value is needed TV2:NLOS line for U1 Stream STB-TV2 •Low bitrate reverse link 1080i, 24, 60 •TV1-TV2 are not co-located, 5 m separation 5 m TV2: •Different video content TV1-TV2 transmitted on each link 0.62 Gbps •Target of 10-9 TMDS 0.497, W/O Blk 5 m CER for HDMI Stream •Pixel is RGB, 24 bits 720x480p, 24,60 Submission Slide 4 Ali Sadri, Intel Corporation

UM2 Option 2.

doc.: 15-06-0369-09-003c November 15, 2006 summary-usage-model UM2 multi Uncompressed Video Streaming Continue

Environment Throughput BER/PiER Distance Note MAC SAP Residential TV1: 10-6 BER for PHY •No data retransmission Simulations STB-TV1 required 0.62 Gbps •Unidirectional data *Justification for this TV1:LOS & transmission noted by solid 0.497, W/O Blk value is needed TV2:NLOS line for U1 Stream STB-TV2 •Low bitrate reverse link 720x480p, 24,60 •TV1-TV2 are not co-located, 5 m separation 5 m TV2: •Different video content TV1-TV2 transmitted on each link 0.62 Gbps •Target of 10-9 TMDS CER for HDMI 0.497, W/O Blk 5 m •Pixel is RGB, 24 bits Stream 720x480p, 24,60

Submission Slide 5 Ali Sadri, Intel Corporation

Select option 1 or 2 for simulations purposes and not both.

doc.: 15-06-0369-09-003c November 15, 2006 summary-usage-model UM3 Office Desktop U1/U2 TV Printer (PR)

TV or Monitor Computer (C) HDD Environment Throughput BER/PER Distance Note MAC SAP NLOS, Desktop 3.56 Gbps 10-6 BER for PHY 1 m •No data retransmission (C-TV) 2.98, W/O Blk Simulations required for TV LOS, Desktop Stream, *Justification for this •Unidirectional data (C-HDD) 1080p, 24, 60 value is needed transmission noted by solid line for U1 & U9 NLOS, Office And/or •Low bitrate reverse link for (C-PR) 1.75 Gbps unidirectional link 1.49, W/O Blk •TV, HDD, PR are not co- Stream located, separation by 120 1080i, 24, 60 deg. -9 0.25 Gbps, average async. 8% PER before 1 m •Target of 10 TMDS Each direction for HDD retransmission CER for HDMI 2K Byte •Pixel is RGB, 24 bits 0.5 Gbps, 8% PER before 5 m •One simulation for this Usage Model average async. retransmission 2K Byte

doc.: 15-06-0369-09-003c November 15, 2006 summary-usage-model UM4 Conference Ad-hoc

Wireless TV Bridge (WB) TV or U17 Computer Computer Projector (C2) (C0) Submission Computer Page 21 Ali S. Sadri (C1)

Environment Throughput BER/PER Distance Note MAC SAP 1.75 Gbps 10-6 BER for PHY •No data retransmission required LOS, office. Simulations 5 m for TV1 1.49, W/O Blk *Justification for •Unidirectional data transmission (C0-TV) Stream this value is noted by solid line for U1 1080i, 24, 60 needed •Low bitrate reverse link for unidirectional link LOS, Desktop 8% PER before 0.0416 Gbps, , average •device are not co-located, retransmission 1 m async. Each direction geometry TBD (C0-C1-C2) 2K Byte •Target of 10-9 TMDS CER for HDMI LOS, office 0.125 Gbps, , average async. 8% PER before •Pixel is RGB, 24 bits Each direction for WB retransmission 3 m 2K Byte •One simulation for this Usage (C0,C1,C2)- Model WB •Total Async throughput of 1 Gbps Submission Slide 9 Ali Sadri, Intel Corporation 11/05/2018 doc: 15-06-0055-18-003c

doc.: 15-06-0369-09-003c November 15, 2006 summary-usage-model UM4 Conference Ad-hoc

Wireless TV Bridge (WB) TV or U17 Computer Computer Projector (C2) (C0) Computer (C1)

Environment Throughput BER/PER Distance Note MAC SAP 1.75 Gbps 10-6 BER for PHY •No data retransmission required LOS, office. Simulations 5 m for TV1 1.49, W/O Blk *Justification for •Unidirectional data transmission (C0-TV) Stream this value is noted by solid line for U1 1080i, 24, 60 needed •Low bitrate reverse link for unidirectional link LOS, Desktop 8% PER before 0.0416 Gbps, , average •device are not co-located, retransmission 1 m async. Each direction geometry TBD (C0-C1-C2) 2K Byte •Target of 10-9 TMDS CER for HDMI LOS, office 0.125 Gbps, , average async. 8% PER before •Pixel is RGB, 24 bits Each direction for WB retransmission 3 m 2K Byte •One simulation for this Usage (C0,C1,C2)- Model WB •Total Async throughput of 1 Gbps Submission Slide 9 Ali Sadri, Intel Corporation

doc.: 15-06-0369-09-003c November 15, 2006 summary-usage-model UM5 Kiosk File-downloading

U7/U9 U7/U9

STB, Game Consol Mobile Storage Movie and Game Kiosk Device, PDA

Environment Throughput BER/PER Distance Note MAC SAP LOS-office 1.50 Gbps burst 8% PER before 1 m • Asymmetric download/Upload retransmission (Server-PDA or (Server-PDA or 2K Byte • Low data rate reverse link PDA-STB) PDA-STB) • Degradation due to PDA jitter LOS-office 2.25 Gbps burst 8% PER before 1 m needs to be considered in the retransmission (Server-PDA or simulation (Server-PDA or 2K Byte PDA STB) PDA-STB) • PDA jitter needs to be specified

Following table shows the result of the ranking of the Usage Models for simulations and comparison purposes. The UM1 and UM5 are mandatory and UM2, UM3, and UM4, are optional modes of operation.

Usage Model Number UM1 UM2 UM3 UM4 UM5

Description P2P Video P2MP Video Wireless Conference P2P Kiosk Desktop

Total Score 116 72 72 73 114 Average Score 2.64 1.64 1.64 1.66 2.59 Ranking Score 1 4 4 3 2 Modes Mandatory Optional Optional Optional Mandatory

9 Geometry and Simulation Scenarios for UM1-UM5 Geometry and simulation scenarios for UM1 and UM5 are denoted in previous section. The access is defined as follows:  Horizontal line is X access  Vertical line is Y access

Geometry and simulation scenarios for UM2, UM3 and UM4 are as following

November 2006 doc.: IEEE 802. 15-06-0xxx-00-003c Geometry for usage model 2 TV1 5m

STB 5m

5m TV2

STB (0,0,0) (m) TV1 (5 3 / 2,2.5,0) TV2 (5 3 / 2,2.5,0)

Submission Slide 5 Fumihide Kojima

In the above diagram the access are define as follows:  Horizontal line is X access  Vertical line is Y access  Origin in the STB node

November 2006 doc.: IEEE 802. 15-06-0xxx-00-003c Geometry for usage model 3 TV 1m C 5m PR 1m HDD C (0,0,0) (m) TV (0.5, 3 / 2,0) HDD (0.5, 3 / 2,0) PR (5,0,0)

Submission Slide 6 Fumihide Kojima

In the above diagram the access are define as follows:  Horizontal line is X access  Vertical line is Y access  Origin in the C node

November 2006 doc.: IEEE 802. 15-06-0486-00-003c Simplified geometry for usage model 4

C2 TV 1m 4m WB C0 1m 1m WB (0,0) (m) C0 (1,0) C1 C1 (0,1) C2 (0,1) TV (4,0)

Submission Slide 2 Chun-Ting Chou

In the above diagram the access are define as follows:  Horizontal line is X access  Vertical line is Y access  Origin in the WB node

9.1 Usage Models MAC Attributes

Table 5- MAC related Systems Attributes

# Usage model MAC Related Systems Attributes 1 UM1 a) Isochronous b) High throughput c) Point-to-Point d) Support for high gain antennas for Data Transmission/reception e) Automatic Device discovery f) Moderate latency g) Minimum reserved bandwidth 2 UM2 a) Isochronous b) High throughput efficiency c) Maintain link throughput while in motion jitter d) Point-to-Point e) Support for moderate gain antennas for Data Transmission f) Automatic device discovery g) Moderate latency h) Minimum reserved bandwidth i) Multiple nearby data transmissions 3 UM3 a) Asynchronous b) High throughput efficiency c) Point-to-Point d) Support for moderate gain antennas for Data Transmission e) Device discovery (Automatic preferred) 4 UM4 a) Asynchronous b) High throughput efficiency c) Point-to-Point d) Support for moderate gain antennas for Data Transmission e) Device discovery (Automatic preferred) f) Multiple nearby data transmissions g) Power saving mode

# Usage model MAC Related Systems Attributes 5 UM5 a) Asynchronous b) Point-to-Point c) Support for moderate gain antennas for Data Transmission d) Device discovery (Automatic preferred) e) Multiple nearby data transmissions f) Power saving mode g) Fast connect 6 Local file transfer for a) Asynchronous printing, document and b) Point-to-Point small size file c) Support for moderate gain antennas for Data Transmission d) Device discovery (Automatic preferred) e) Multiple nearby data transmissions f) Power saving mode 7 Local file transfer for bulky a) Asynchronous music and video, point-to- b) Point-to-Point point connection c) Support for moderate gain antennas for Data Transmission (photo/video camera and d) Device discovery (Automatic preferred) photo/video handy phone, e) Multiple nearby data transmissions mp3 player) f) Power saving mode 8 Wireless docking station a) Isochronous b) High throughput efficiency c) Maintain link throughput while in motion jitter d) Point-to-Point e) Support for moderate gain antennas for Data Transmission f) Device discovery (Automatic preferred) g) Moderate latency h) Minimum reserved bandwidth i) Multiple nearby data transmissions

10 References

[1] IEEE P802.15-05-0353-07-003c

Appendix: Data Rate With TMDS (Gbps) Applications 1 1280 x 720 p, 24 Hz 0.7810 US HDTV 2 1280 x 720 p, 30 Hz 0.9763 US HDTV 3 2880 x 576 i, 50 Hz 1.5457 Game consoles 4 2880 x 288 p, 50 Hz 1.6165 Game consoles 5 1440 x 480 p, 59.94 Hz 1.6200 High end DVD players 6 1440 x 576 p, 50 Hz 1.6200 High end DVD players 7 1440 x 480 p, 60 Hz 1.6216 High end DVD players 8 2880 x 240 p, 59.94 Hz 1.6231 Game consoles 9 1920 x 1080 i, 50 Hz 2.1830 EU HDTV 10 1920 x 1080 i, 60 Hz 2.1830 US HDTV, EU HDTV 11 1280 x 720 p, 50 Hz 2.2275 EU HDTV 12 1280 x 720 p, 60 Hz 2.2275 US HDTV, EU HDTV 13 1920 x 1080 p, 24 Hz 2.2275 US HDTV 14 1920 x 1080 p, 30 Hz 2.2275 US HDTV 15 1920 x 1080 p, 50 Hz 4.4550 NEXT GEN 16 1920 x 1080 p, 60 Hz 4.4550 NEXT GEN

doc.: 15-06-0369-01-003c September 2006 summary-usage-model HDMI Requirement

HDTV Resolutions Only change fonts in blue.

Resolutions 24 bits/pixel HDMI Standard TMDS Overhead 6 bits/pixel HDMI Standard

A B C D E F G Resolution (pixels) Frame Rate Aspect Blanking Overhead Raw Data Rate Raw Data Rate With TMDS (frames/s) Ratio (pixels) Excl. Bl. (Gbps) (Gbps) (Gbps) 1280 x 720 p 50 16:9 700 x 30 1.1059 1.7820 2.2275 1280 x 720 p 60 16:9 370 x 30 1.3271 1.7820 2.2275 1920 x 1080 i 50 16:9 720 x 45 1.2442 1.7820 2.2275 1920 x 1080 p 60 16:9 280 x 45 2.9860 3.5640 4.4550 1920 x 1080 p 50 16:9 720 x 45 2.4883 3.5640 4.4550 1920 x 1080 i 60 16:9 280 x 45 1.4930 1.7820 2.2275

Submission Page 31 Ali S. Sadri