Evergreen Valley College s2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evergreen Valley College s2

Evergreen Valley College Program Review Feedback Form Political Science Date: 4/26/11 Reviewed by: Institutional Effective Committee (IEC)

SUMMARY OF THE DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM Did the Review Team clearly articulate summary? No (Ratto) If not, provide concrete feedback on information needed. No summary provided, not sure if it is needed (Ratto)

Did the Review Team clearly identify and assess strength and areas of improvements in relevant areas? Were there action plans included that would address areas of improvement? If not, provide concrete feedback on information needed in specific section. No Summary provided (Archuleta)

PART A: Overview of Program Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information needed. Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? If not, identify areas and information needed. There are no “improvement areas”; however, there is mention about the need for a full-time faculty (Archuleta) Suggestions (Ratto)

PART B: CURRICULUM Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information needed. Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? Yes (Archuleta) If not, identify areas and information needed. Plans are under way to develop a hybrid online PS (Policital Science) course by Fall 2011. Additionally, there is mention of developing three additional PS courses. There were no action plans on when, how, or whom will be involved in developing these courses (Archuleta). Suggestions (Ratto) PART C: STUDENT OUTCOMES

1

Program Review feedback form IEC (Archuleta & Ratto) feedback 4_26_11 VP Academic Affairs Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information needed. Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Archuleta) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? Yes (Archuleta) If not, identify areas and information needed. SLO assessment tools are in the process of being developed (Archuleta)

PART D: FACULTY AND STAFF Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information needed. Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? So, so (Archuleta) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? Yes (Ratto) If not, identify areas and information needed. Comprehensive information on the evaluation process was provided, but there is no data on when the instructors were last evaluated (Archuleta) Part A & B suggestions (Ratto) PART E: FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND MAINTENANCE Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information needed. Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? No (Archuleta) If not, identify areas and information needed.

PART F: FUTURE NEEDS Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information needed. Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Archuleta & Ratto) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? No (Archuleta) If not, identify areas and information needed. Technology is mentioned as a future need – no specific plan is presented as to how this will be achieved (Archuleta)

PART G: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Provide concrete questions or feedback if needed. None (Archuleta)

Recommended publications