Constitutional Convention
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Name______Date______
US History: Zagari/Squires
Constitutional Convention
Of 1787
“Bundle of Compromises”
Directions: Using your textbook, pg. 142-143 and complete the following organizer. Write a brief explanation of the issue, the different positions held and the compromise that was reached.
Issue NJ Plan VA Plan Compromise Representation in Unicameral Appeased larger Great Compromise Congress legislature (1) populated states Bicameral (2) Congress with Each state would 2 house legislature the House of receive two senators (bicameral) Representatives and Senate regardless of Both houses would House of Representatives population be based on state (lower house) seats are William Patterson population based on population size of Appease small states the state who feared larger o Census is taken state would every 10 years to dominate the federal determine legislature population size Senate (Upper house) seats based on 2 per state
Issue North South Compromise Should slaves be Slaves should not be Wanted slaves to be 3/5 Compromise considered as counted towards counted towards 3 out of every 5 slaves would count part of the population for the general towards taxation and population general representatives but population but not population? towards taxation towards taxation They were considered that if slaves were not counted towards population the national legislature would be dominated by northern states Issue Strong Central Government Strong State Government Compromise Central government Authority derives Federalism (division of States are fearful of a should be stronger from the states powers between state and repeat of the colonial Authority derives States should fed) experience under British from the people remain stronger rule. than the central Delegated Powers: Powers government given to the federal government
Reserved Powers: powers reserved to the states
Concurrent: powers that are shared between states and federal
Summary:
1. Why the Constitution was considered a “bundle of compromises”?
2. How did the compromises made, at the convention, address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation?
3. Does the Constitution reflect a change in the purpose of government? Why? Why not?