Research Pape R Judging Sheet

2016-17 Northern Virginia’s Regional SeaPerch Challenge

Innovative Design Challenge

School Name ______Team Name/Team Number______Total Score______

Design Design and Propulsion Ballast Game Design Organization of Presentation Element Robot Structure (Worth 10 points) (Worth 10 Points) Strategy Explanation Team Answers TriFold (Worth 20 Points) (Worth 20 Points) (Worth 10 Points) (Worth 10 Points) (Worth 20 Points) Rubric Points - Exceptional creative -Propulsion system -Ballast is changed to play - Exceptional, - Students completely - The presentation was -Clear, creative and design. mounted in an exceptional creative and different understand their design well organized, and each professional looking TriFold. each game. Excellent - Unique use of provided unexpected manner. strategy used to and demonstrate both their member of the team -Pictures of the ROV materials and creative complete each design and understanding understood each demonstrate at least 5 of the 10/10 incorporation of additional mission (game). to the judges in a clear, participant’s role in the concepts discussed in this components. concise presentation. presentation. rubric. Or -Each student shared in the -The presentation flowed -The innovative design 20/20 innovative design smooth and clearly from process is clearly presented. explanation to the judges. one topic point to another.

- Creative design. -Propulsion system -Ballast is changed to play - Creative and -Students understand their - The presentation was -Clear, creative and -Unique use of provided mounted in a creative each game, but the changes different strategy design but may not have a somewhat organized, and professional looking TriFold. materials and/or structural unexpected manner. do not have a positive used to complete solid understanding of the each member of the team -Pictures of the ROV components. impact on play. each mission design implications; somewhat understood demonstrate at least 3 of the Good (game). therefore their presentation each participant’s role in concepts discussed in this 8/10 is not entirely clear. the presentation. There rubric. -Each student shared in the was one time when two -The innovative design or innovative design people spoke, but the process is clearly presented. explanation to the judges. team worked it out. 15/20 -The presentation flowed smooth and clearly from one topic point to another.

- Robot structure had a -Propulsion system has a -The ballast is changed for - The same strategy -Students somewhat - The presentation was -TriFold created, contains creative but slight variation slight variation from the one of the games. is used on 2 games understand their design NOT well organized, but good material, but hard to Fair from the design instructions design instructions and the third game and demonstrate both their the information was follow. has a unique design and understanding delivered. -Pictures of the ROV 6/10 strategy. to the judges in a clear, -Individuals did not always demonstrate at least 2 of the concise presentation. have a concise answer, or concepts discussed in this or -Presentation done by a more than one person rubric. 10/20 couple of team members spoke. -The innovative design rather than the entire team. process is attempted to be presented. -Robot structure is identical -Propulsion system is -The same ballast is used in - No strategy for -Students either do NOT -The presentation was -TriFold created weakly or not Needs to design instructions. identical to design the same position to play completing missions completely understand their NOT well organized. at all. instructions. every game. (games) design or do NOT -There were times when -Pictures of the ROV Improvement demonstrate both their two people would speak or demonstrate at least 1 of the 4/10 design well to the judges. no one would speak. concepts discussed in this rubric. Or -The innovative design process is not clearly 5/20 presented. Score