Connor, M. (1997). Teaching United States History Thematically. Social Education, 61 (4)

Running head: THEMATIC INSTRUCTION: WEIGHING BREADTH VS DEPTH 1 & ITS CORRELATION TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT & ENGAGEMENT References

Bredekamp, S. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age eight. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Connor, M. (1997). Teaching United States history thematically. Social Education, 61 (4), 203-204.

Czerniak, C., Lumpe, A., & Haney, J. (1999). Science teachers’ beliefs and intentions to implement thematic units. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10 (2), 123-145.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1), 2-11.

Gardner, Howard (1983): Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York, Basic Books. Golonka, S., & Estes, Z. (2009). Thematic relations affect similarity via commonalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35 (6), 1454-1464.

Griffiths, M. (2009). Thematic mathematics: the combinatorics of prime factorizations. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 29, 25-40.

Hanna, P.R. (1957). Generalizations and universal values: Their implications for the social studies program. Social studies in the elementary schools. Fifty-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education Part II (pp.27-47). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hind, E., & Perry, N. (2007). Elementary teachers’ applications of Jean Piaget’s theories of cognitive development during social studies curriculum debates in Arizona. The Elementary School Journal, 108 (1), 63-79.

Hurd, P.D. (1991). Why we must transform science education. Educational Leadership, 49 (2), 33-35.

Huseman, R., Goodman, D. (1977). The history classroom: a role for debate in the thematic approach. Communication Education, 26 (2), 166-170.

Jung, E., & Reid, N. (2009). Working memory and attitudes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27 (2), 205-223.

Kaiser, C. (2010). Redrawing the boundaries: a constructivist approach to combating student apathy in the secondary history classroom. The History Teacher, 43 (2), 223-232. Running head: THEMATIC INSTRUCTION: WEIGHING BREADTH VS DEPTH 2 & ITS CORRELATION TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT & ENGAGEMENT Liu, M.-C, & Wang, J.-Y.(2010). Investigating knowledge integration in web-based thematic learning using concept mapping assessment. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (2), 25-39.

Miller, P., Eilam, B. (2008). Development in the thematic and containment-relation-oriented organization of word concepts. The Journal of Educational Research, 101 (6), 350-362.

Oddleifson, E. (1994). What do we want our schools to do? Phi Delta Kappan, 75 (6), 446- 453.

Paour, J.-L., & Bailleux, C. (2009). Developing the concept of order: an example of constructivist remediation for optimizing memory and learning processes. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8 (2), 128-147.

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P.H. Mussen (Ed), Carmichael’s Manuel of Child Psychology, 1 (1). New York: Wiley.

Reynolds, J., (2010). Writing in the discipline of anthropology – theoretical, thematic and geographical spaces. Studies in Higher Education, 35 (1), 11-24.

Shanahan, T., Robinson, B., & Schneider, M. (1995). Avoiding some of the pitfalls of thematic units. The Reading Teacher, 48 (8), 718-719.

Wan, G. (2006). Teaching diversity & tolerance in the classroom: a thematic storybook approach. Education, 127, (1), 140-154.

White, R. (1995). How thematic teaching can transform history instruction. Educational Research Complete, 68 (3).

Youssef, L. (2010) A Matter of relevance: Teaching classics in the 21st century. College Teaching, 58, 28-31.