Schedule 3: Drafting Checklist
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
National Heavy Vehicle Regulator
Schedule 3: Drafting Checklist
No. Requirement Stage Complete? Section of RICP
1) Has the purpose of the RICP been considered and 2.2 documented?
2) Has the scope of the RICP been considered and 2.2 documented?
3) Have relevant stakeholders been identified and 2.1 consulted? Has this consultation process been documented in the RICP?
4) Have the relevant duties under the HVNL been 2.2 identified and recorded?
5) Have all relevant HVNL related health and safety 2.4 risks been identified?
6) Have each of the identified risks been assessed? 2.5 7) Have appropriate control methods been suggested? 2.6 8) Is the risk management process (RMP) that was used 2.3 to assess high level risks consistent with AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009?
9) Is a report on that process included for submission 2.5 with the RICP?
10) Is guidance provided to an adopter to perform a 2.7 customized risk management process (RMP) of their own operation?
11) Is the adopter required to identify, assess and 2.7 control risks?
12) Is the adopter required to document their RMP? 2.7 13) Is the adopter required to monitor compliance with 2.7 their RMP and use feedback to review and update it?
14) Are the links between relevant parts of the HVNL, 2.8 risks, and controls clearly explained?
15) Is the RICP expressed as simply and clearly as 2 possible?
16) Are technical terms and acronyms explained in a 2 glossary or list of definitions?
17) Has the way of maintaining, reviewing and auditing 2.7
National Heavy Vehicle Regulator 201701-0463 Page 1 of 2 No. Requirement Stage Complete? Section of RICP the RICP been considered and documented?
18) Has a suitable person been identified who can 3.1 assume responsibility for the above? Has the person agreed to undertake the duty?
19) Is a signed statement from the developer included? 3.2 20) Is evidence of the administrator’s authority 3.2 included?
21) Is a signed statement from the administrator 3.2 included?