JAST Action Plan and Monitoring

UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

JOINT ASSISTANCE STRATEGY

FOR TANZANIA (JAST)

ACTION PLAN AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK

Working Document

June 2007

1 List of Abbreviations

AcGen Accountant General CAS Country Assistance Strategy CMO Chief Minister’s Office DP Development Partner DPG Development Partners Group GBS General Budget Support IFMS Integrated Financial Management System IMG Independent Monitoring Group JAST Joint Assistance Strategy for Tanzania LGA Local Government Authority MCDGC Ministry of Community Development, Gender and Children MDAs Ministries, Departments, and Agencies MITM Ministry of Industry, Trade and Marketing MKUKUTA Mkakati Wa Kukuza Uchumi Na Kupunguza Umaskini Tanzania MKUZA Mkakati Wa Kukuza Uchumi Na Kupunguza Umaskini Zanzibar MOF Ministry of Finance MOFEA Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs (Zanzibar) MOHA Ministry of Home Affairs MPAMITA Mkakati Wa Pamoja Wa Misaada Tanzania MPEE Ministry of Planning, Economy and Empowerment MS-PORASF Ministry of State (President’s Office) – Regional Administration and Special Forces (Zanzibar) MTEF Medium-Term Expenditure Framework NSAs Non-state actors ODA Official Development Assistance OECD-DAC Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development – Development Assistance Committee

2 O&OD Obstacles and Opportunities for Development PER Public Expenditure Review PFMRP Public Financial Management Reform Programme PIU Project Implementation Unit PlanRep Planning and Reporting Database (for Local Government) PMO-RALG Prime Minister’s Office – Regional Administration and Local Government PO-PSM President’s Office – Public Service Management PO-RC President’s Office – Revolutionary Council PPAA Public Procurement Appeals Authority PPRA Public Procurement Regulatory Authority RIMKU Ripoti Ya Utekelezaji Wa MKUKUTA (MKUKUTA Monitoring System) SBAS Strategic Budget Allocation System TA Technical Assistance TOR Terms of Reference TPSF Tanzania Private Sector Foundation WG Working Group

3 Table of Content

1. What is the JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Framework?…………………………. 5 2. Structure of the JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Framework ……………...... ……..5 3. JAST Monitoring and Evaluation Process.....……………………………………..…....6 4. Immediate Actions for JAST Implementation………………………………………….7 5. JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Matrix.. ……..………………………………….….8 Annex I: Paris Declaration Indicators……………………………….…………………...20 Annex II: Tanzania Baseline and Targets for Paris Indicators…………………………..22 Annex III: Methodology Note for Monitoring JAST Indicators……..………………….25

4 1. What is the JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Framework?

The Joint Assistance Strategy for Tanzania (JAST), in Kiswahili “Mkakati Wa Pamoja Wa Misaada Tanzania” (MPAMITA), is Tanzania’s national strategy for managing development co-operation between the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania (the Government) and its Development Partners (DPs) so as to achieve national development and poverty reduction goals. Whereas the JAST Document outlines main objectives, principles, commitments and broad arrangements for JAST implementation, the JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Framework specifies the concrete actions to be undertaken by the Government and DPs to put JAST into practice during its cycle of implementation (2006/07-2010/11). The JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Framework also list a range of monitoring indicators for assessing progress in achieving JAST commitments and objectives.

2. Structure of the JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Framework

The JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Framework is presented in the matrix in section 4. The matrix is structured as follows: a) The matrix is organised around the five JAST objectives, which are: i. Strengthening national ownership and Government leadership of the development process; ii. Aligning DP support to Government priorities, systems, structures and procedures; iii. Harmonising Government and DP processes; iv. Managing resources for achieving development results, in particular on MKUKUTA/ MKUZA; and v. Strengthening domestic and mutual accountability. b) Under each JAST objective, the matrix is arranged into JAST commitments (column 1), which capture general commitments or principles outlined in the JAST Document and are the reference point for both activities and monitoring indicators. As much as possible, commitments have been limited to those that matter in particular for aid effectiveness and constitute an additionality to the already existing commitments in MKUKUTA/ MKUZA, PER, core reforms and other processes. c) Columns 2 to 5 from “activities” to “means of verification/monitorable output” constitute the Action Plan part of the combined Action Plan and Monitoring Matrix. For each JAST commitment, relevant activities are identified for its realisation. To each activity, agencies that are responsible for implementation are assigned, whereby lead agencies are also indicated (M-Lead for agencies that take lead on mainland activities; Z-Lead for agencies that take lead on Zanzibar activities). The timeframe is also specified, i.e. the month and year by when the activity is expected to be completed. In addition, the column “means of verification/monitorable output” lists the output by which it can be verified that an activity has taken place.

5 d) The columns of the matrix that are particular to the monitoring framework are the “outcome indicators”, “indicator baseline” and “indicator target”, and the “indicator review process” (columns 6-9). The monitoring indicators are outcome-based and are linked to the JAST commitments. Some of them (in italics) are indicators from the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 1, which Tanzania together with other countries reports on internationally through biennial surveys conducted by the OECD-DAC. Not all Paris indicators are included in the JAST monitoring framework, because related actions have either already been completed or are undertaken in other existing processes. Tanzania nevertheless reports on them to the OECD-DAC monitoring survey on the Paris Declaration every two years until 2010. Baseline values for the outcome indicators are set for 2005 and indicator targets for the end of the first term of JAST implementation in 2010/11. For Paris indicators, the baseline was taken from the 2006 survey using data from 2004/05; targets correspond for most indicators to the Paris equivalents, for some, they are set more ambitiously than the Paris targets to reflect the more progressive environment of Tanzania and the fact that for some indicators, Tanzania has already or almost reached Paris targets. Further details on the Paris indicators and targets, Tanzania’s progress against them, as well as their interpretation and measurement in the Tanzanian context can be found in annexes I, II and III respectively. The indicator review process shows which process is used to generate the necessary data or information for measuring the indicator and/or to review progress against the indicator.

3. JAST Monitoring and Evaluation Process

As stipulated in the JAST Document, the Government and DPs in consultation with non- state actors will review their performance in implementing the JAST on an annual basis, utilizing to the greatest extent possible the existing Government processes as the main avenues for dialogue, analysis and information generation. This will be guided by the joint Government-DP JAST Working Group. The findings from these processes will be consolidated in annual JAST progress reports, which are to be produced in November each year.

During the mid and final term of JAST implementation, the Government and DPs will jointly commission an Independent Monitoring Group (IMG) to undertake a comprehensive assessment of Government and DP performance in implementing the JAST. The IMG’s report will be discussed by the Government, DPs and non-state actors and the way forward agreed upon. The Government together with DPs will have a high level consultative meeting at mid- term (FY 2008/09) and at the end of the JAST cycle, which will be based on a more comprehensive mid-term and final review respectively as well as findings of the IMG Reports.

1 The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness was agreed upon by donor agencies and developing countries at the Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in March 2006 in Paris. It consists of a range of partnership commitments around the principles of ownership, alignment, harmonisation, managing resources for results, and accountability. Progress in implementing these commitments is monitored through 10 Paris indicators with global targets for 2010.

6 4. Immediate actions for JAST implementation

Whereas the JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Framework is a comprehensive tool that spells out actions, monitoring indicators and targets for the implementation of JAST commitments, the following actions are identified as areas for immediate work:

1. Formulate and implement a TA policy 2. Strengthen MTEF projections and integrate all external resources in the Government budget and Exchequer system 3. Establish effective division of labour within Government and among DPs 4. Harmonise and rationalise Government and DP processes in line with national calendar of processes

7 5. JAST Action Plan and Monitoring Matrix

8 Objective 1: Strengthening national ownership and Government leadership of the development process JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output 1. Develop 1.1. Formulate and MPEE(Lead), By Jun 2008 TA policy in place 1.1. Percent of TA for 50% 70% OECD sustainable national operationalise TA policy PO-PSM, PO- and operational capacity development (Paris Paris capacity for external RC through coordinated target: survey resource programmes managed by 50%) 2008, management, 1.2. Establish pooled PO- By Jun 2008 Pooled funding the Government (Paris 2010JAST MKUKUTA funding arrangements for PSM(Lead), arrangements for indicator 4) review monitoring, and other TA1.3. Establish data MOF, TA in place and processes; DPs systems for tracking of MOFEA, operational 1.2. Percent of TA provide demand- TA expenditures DPsDPs(Lead (percent of ODA) that is OECD driven TA, which is 1.4. Establish and DP PSRP By Jun 2008 TA expenditure used for capacity Paris increasingly managed maintain databank of Working tracking data development survey by the Government national experts Group-lead), systems in place and 2008, MOF, reports generated 1.3. Reliable public 4.5 5.0 2010 1.5. Integrate aid MOFEA Databank for financial management (World (World coordination and external By Jun 2008 national experts in systems (Paris indicator Bank Bank OECD resource management, PO-PSM(M- place 2a) score) score) Paris MKUKUTA and PER Lead), survey process management PO-RC(Z- 1.4. Reliable procurement 2008, functions within the core Lead) By Dec 2008 Integration reports system is in place (Paris Score not Target 2010 functions of policy and indicator 2b) yet depends planning departments of MPEE & PO- available on score PFMRP MDAs, Regions and PSM (M- LGAs Lead), MOF, 1.5. Procurement system MOFEA(Z- of international standard 1.6. Establish aid database Lead), PO-RC, in MDAs, Regions and MDAs, LGAs Regions and LGAs By Jun 2008 1.7. Strengthen the Number of MDAs, capacity of Policy and Regions, LGAs with Planning Departments in MOF(M- aid database in place external resource Lead), management MOFEA(Z- Lead), MDAs, Regions, Ongoing 1.8. Strengthen LGAs JAST Government procurement implementation systems so as to attain MOF(M- report international standards Lead), PO- PSM, MPEE, MOFEA(Z- Lead), PO-RC, MDAs, 9 Regions, FY 2009/10 PFMRP Review LGAs Report

PPRA(M- Objective 2: Aligning DP support to Government priorities, systems, structures and procedures JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output 1. Align DP support 1.1. DPs revise their CAS DPs(Lead), By Dec Number of DPs 1.1. ODA recorded in 90% 95% JAST with national and in line with JAST MOF, 2008 with revised CAS national budget as % of review sector development principles MOFEA actual ODA (annual); strategies, policies and disbursements to OECD programmes 1.2. Review projects/ MPEE (M- By Jun 2008 List of reviewed Government (Paris Paris programmes and identify Lead), projects/ indicator 3)i survey whether they are aligned MOF, programmes (2008, with (integrated into) MOFEA (Z- 2010) national and sector Lead), strategies and MDAs, DPs 1.2. Percent of projects/ JAST programmes (DPG WGs) programmes that are not review aligned with (integrated in) national and sector strategies/ programmes 2. DPs increasingly 2.1. Mainstream parallel MOF (M- Ongoing PIU mainstreaming 2.1. Number of parallel 56 0 (Paris JAST rely on Government PIUs into Government Lead), report PIUs (Paris indicator 6) target: review structures, systems structures MPEE, 19) (annual); and procedures and MOFEA(Z- OECD work towards Lead), Paris providing untied aid MDAs, survey incl. untied TA Regions, (2008, LGAs, DPs 2010)

2.2. DPs review their DPs(individu By Dec 2008 Number of DPs with 2.2. Percent of ODA 61% JAST development cooperation al DPs-Lead revised development disbursements that use 75% review policies and regulations to with JAST cooperation policies national financial (annual); allow the use of WG and regulations reporting procedures OECD Government procurement/ coordination), (Paris indicator 5a) Paris financial management MOF, survey

10 Objective 2: Aligning DP support to Government priorities, systems, structures and procedures JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output systems MOFEA (2008, (Follow-up) 2010) 2.3. Formulate and By Jun 2008 Plans in place; implement plans of untying implementation 2.3. Percent of ODA 60% JAST aid report. disbursements that use 75% review national auditing (annual); procedures (Paris OECD DPs(LeadIndi indicator 5a) Paris vidual survey DP.HQs- (2008, lead)), MOF, 2010) MOFEA 2.4. Percent of ODA 61% JAST disbursements that follow 75% review national procurement (Paris (annual); procedures (Paris target not OECD indicator 5b) yet Paris available) survey (2008, 2010)

2.5. Percent of ODA that JAST is untied review

3. DPs increasingly 3.1. Strengthen the budget MOF(M- Ongoing PER report 3.1. Percent of GBS JAST move to GBS; use management process Lead), versus basket funds versus review basket funds where MPEE, project funds in total appropriate; and MOFEA(Z- ODA disbursements project funds for Lead), MDAs (overall and by DP) large-scale infrastructure 3.2. Establish baseline for DPs(LeadIndi By Jun 2008 Baseline available; 3.2. Number of projects JAST

11 Objective 2: Aligning DP support to Government priorities, systems, structures and procedures JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output investment, piloting each DP on the vidual DPs- (ongoing) number of DPs that are in conformity review and emergency aid composition of aid (aid by lead, with available with guideline to be used modalities) and formulate coordinated plans only for piloting, and implement plans for by PRBS emergency, and large- increasing the proportion DP), MOF, scale infrastructure of GBS MOFEA support

3.3. Train MDAs, Regions By Jun 2008 Number of MDAs, and LGAs on GBS Regions and LGAs trained

MOF(Lead), MPEE, 3.4. Develop criteria to MDAs, By Jun 2008 Criteria is available determine large-scale Regions, infrastructure investments LGAs and piloting projects MPEE(Lead), MOF, MOFEA, MDAs

12 Objective 2: Aligning DP support to Government priorities, systems, structures and procedures JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output 4. Project and basket 4.1. Review existing basket MOF(Lead), By Jun 2009 Guidelines in 4.1. Percent of project and JAST funds adhere to JAST funds and develop DPs, MDAs, place; programmes (basket review principles.ii guidelines for MOFEA implementation funds) that meet JAST mainstreaming those that report principles do not meet JAST principles into GBS

4.2. Review and revise MOF(Lead), By Jun 2008 Guidelines and guidelines and processes MOFEA, processes are for basket fund and project MPEE, revised approval to be in line with MDAs JAST principles 5. Strengthen MTEF 5.1. DPs discuss and DPs(LeadDP Annual (as DP MTEF external 5.1. Percent of DPs that PER, projections and agree MTEF external G WGs-lead), agreed in the resource projections provide timely MTEF JAST integrate all external resource projections with MOF, PER process) submitted to MOF projections review resources in the MDAs, Regions and MOFEA, Government budget LGAs before submitting MDAs, 5.2. Percent of year-to- PER, and Exchequer them to MOF Regions, year variation of MTEF JAST system LGAs commitments over a review 5.2. Familiarise DPs on the Ongoing Number of DP rolling three-year MTEF use of the Government MOF(Lead), agencies trained period budget and Exchequer MOFEA, system DPs (Main 5.3. Percent of ODA 76% of 95% of PER DPG-lead) disbursements to total ODA total ODA JAST 5.3. DPs provide Ongoing Accounting details Government (in total and to to review accounting details to are provided to per DP) that are captured Governme Governme MDAs, Regions and LGAs DPs(LeadD MDAs, Regions, in the Exchequer system nt nt for direct project funds in PG with LGAs line with AcGen Note 2001 individual DP follow- up), MDAs, Ongoing Number of DPs

13 Objective 2: Aligning DP support to Government priorities, systems, structures and procedures JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output Regions, implementing plans LGAs for using the 5.4. Formulate and Exchequer implement plans to increase the proportion of DPs(LeadM funds channelled through ain DPG- Exchequer lead), MOF, MOFEA 6. GBS 6.1. Follow up and monitor MOF(Lead), Ongoing GBS annual review 6.1. Percent of DPs that 71% 100% GBS disbursements are confirmed GBS GBS DPs report conform with their GBS (timing)/ review, frontloaded in the disbursement schedule disbursement schedule in 79% JAST first half of the terms of timing and (amount) review financial year and are 6.2. Follow up on MDAs, MOF(M- Ongoing Project and basket amount in line with the Regions and LGAs Lead), fund disbursement confirmed GBS project/ programme MOFEA(Z- reports 6.2. Percent of project PER schedule of implementation and DP Lead), fund disbursements JAST disbursements. release of funds in line MDAs, against commitments to review with commitments. Regions, Government Project and basket LGAs fund disbursements 6.3. Percent of basket PER are made in fund disbursements JAST accordance with the against commitments to review existing agreements Government

6.4. ODA disbursements 85% JAST in Government review accounting (Exchequer) system as % of ODA recorded in national budget

14 Objective 2: Aligning DP support to Government priorities, systems, structures and procedures JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output 6.5. ODA disbursements 70% 85% JAST recorded in Government review accounting system as % (annual), of ODA commitments to OECD Government (Paris Paris indicator 7) survey (2008, 2010)

15 Objective 3: Harmonising Government and Development Partner processes JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output 1. Make division of 1.1. Agree on MOF(M- By Sep 2007 Sector and thematic 1.1. Number of JAST, labor within sector/thematic area Lead), area classification sectors/thematic areas that GBS, Government and classification incl. TOR MOFEA(Z- with TOR in place function appropriately sector among DPs more and specify MDA Lead), MDAs reviews, effective membership MKUKU TA-PER 1.2. DPs restructure their DPs By Sep 2007 Restructured DP engagement in (LeadJAST engagement in 1.2. Number of active DPs JAST sectors/thematic areas in WG and sectors/thematic per sector/thematic area review line with Government PRBS DPs), areas classification of sectors/ JAST WG, 1.3. Number of JAST thematic areas MDAs sectors/thematic areas per review active DP 1.3. Prepare generic TOR By Sep 2007 TOR with code of with code of conduct for conduct in place lead, active and delegating partners JAST WG 2. Harmonise and 2.1. Review the existing MOF(M- Ongoing Review report in 2.1. Revised calendar of JAST rationalise national/sector processes Lead), place processes (where necess.) review Government and DP and identify scope for MPEE, processes in line with further harmonisation and MOFEA(Z- 2.2. Number of missions 541 JAST national calendar of rationalisation around the Lead), DPs (by DP) review processes national budget and (JAST WG to (annual); MKUKUTA/ MKUZA follow-up), OECD processes with effective MDAs Paris inter-linkages survey (2008, 2.2. DPs undertake joint Annual Joint MTEF external 2010) financial programming resource projections DPs(LeadDP reported to MOF 2.3. Percent of total 17% 40% JAST G WGs-lead), missions that are review

16 Objective 3: Harmonising Government and Development Partner processes JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification / JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output MOF, Ongoing Harmonised joint/coordinated (Paris (annual); 2.3. Lead DPs coordinate MOFEA missions and indicator 10a) OECD and record missions and analytic works in Paris analytic works in line with DPs (DPG line with national survey the Government calendar Sector WGs- calendar (2008, of processes lead) 2010)

2.4. Number of analytic 81 JAST works (by DP) review (annual); OECD Paris survey (2008, 2010)

2.5. Percent of country 38% 66% JAST analytic work that is joint/ review coordinated (Paris (annual); indicator 10b) OECD Paris survey (2008, 2010)

17 Objective 4: Managing resources for achieving development results, in particular on MKUKUTA/MKUZA JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification/ JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output 1. Strengthen linkage 1.1. Strengthen linkages MOF(M- Ongoing Reports available 1.1. Percent of national MKUKU between between MTEF, SBAS/ Lead), budget allocation to TA-PER MKUKUTA/ PlanRep, IFMS and MOFEA(Z- MKUKUTA/ MKUZA MKUZA, other RIMKU Lead), national and sector MPEE, 1.2. Percent of national MKUKU strategies, policies PMO- budget spent on TA-PER and programmes and RALG, MKUKUTA/ MKUZA MKUKU the national budget MDAs, TA-PER Regions, 1.3. Percent of divergence LGAs between approved budget and actual expenditures 1.2. Roll out O&OD to all PMO- Ongoing Progress report on LGAs RALG the use of O&OD (Lead), LGAs

1.3. Initiate O&OD to all MS- By Dec 2008 LGAs in Zanzibar PORASF(Z- Lead), LGAs

18 Objective 5: Strengthening Domestic and Mutual Accountability JAST commitments Activities to implement Responsible Activity Means of Outcome indicators for Indicator Indicator Indicator JAST commitments agencies timeframe verification/ JAST commitments baseline target review monitorable (2005) (2010/11) process output 1. Strengthen 1.1. Review national/sector MOF(M- Ongoing Review reports 1.1. Satisfactory MKUKU national/sector dialogue and accountability Lead), national/sector dialogue TA-PER, dialogue and mechanisms and identify MOFEA(Z- sector accountability ways of strengthening Lead), reviews, mechanisms them MDAs, GBS Regions, review LGAs, DPs (DPG WGs) 2. Provide timely and 2.1. Prepare and MOF & Annual Relevant reports are 2.1. Timely release of MKUKU clear information on disseminate reports in MPEE (M- available relevant reports TA-PER, outcomes of English and Kiswahili on Lead), MKUZA, MKUKUTA/ budget execution, PER, MOFEA(Z- GBS, MKUZA, the GBS annual review, Lead) JAST national budget and MKUKUTA/ MKUZA review other processes as implementation, and well as on ODA JAST progress 2.2. Amount of reported JAST disbursements to ODA disbursements to review, relevant stakeholders 2.2. DPs report on their DPs(LeadIn Quarterly DPs’ quarterly Government and non-state PER ODA disbursements made dividual disbursement reports actors to Government and NSAs DPs-lead), on quarterly basis MOF, 2.3. Percent of DPs that JAST MOFEA provide timely quarterly review disbursement reports to MOF/MOFEA

3. Undertake regular 3.1. Government and DPs JAST Annual Annual JAST 3.1. Annual JAST JAST JAST monitoring and undertake annual review WG(Lead), review takes place/ implementation report is review evaluation of their performance in MDAs, JAST progress produced JAST implementation Regions, report

19 Objective 5: Strengthening Domestic and Mutual Accountability LGAs, DPs 3.2. Mid-term and final JAST (JAST WG independent assessment review DPs), NSAs /IMG report By Dec 2008 IMG 3.2. Government and DPs JAST WG (mid-term) commissioned / commission an IMG to By Sep IMG report undertake an independent 2011(final) assessment of Government and DP performance in JAST implementation 4. NSAs share 4.1. Develop code of MCDGC(Le By June 2008 Code of conduct in 4.1. Percent of registered JAST information on their conduct for NSA ad), MITM, place NSAs that adhere to code review activities and transparency and NSAs, TPSF of conduct for NSA financial resources accountability transparency and with their accountability constituents and the 4.2. Establish/maintain MCDGC(Le By June 2008 Database with Government database of NSA places of ad), MOHA, reports in place operation, activities and MDAs, resources to be used for Regions, Government planning LGAs, TPSF, Foundation for Civil Society

20 21 Annex I: Monitoring indicators of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness

22 23 Annex II: Tanzania baseline and targets for Paris indicators

Paris indicator Tanzania Paris target for 2010 JAST target for 2010/11 Review process baseline 2005 Ownership 1. National development strategy is operational B A N/A (not a JAST indicator) Biennial World Bank with clear strategic priorities linked to a medium- HQ assessment for term expenditure framework and reflected in OECD-DAC Paris annual budgets survey 2006, 2008, 2010 Alignment 2. a) Reliable public financial management 4.5 5.0 5.0 Biennial World Bank systems HQ assessment for OECD-DAC Paris survey 2006, 2008, 2010

2. b) Reliable procurement systems score not yet score not yet available JAST target will be the Biennial assessment by available same as Paris target, once OECD-DAC Joint available Venture for Procurement for Paris survey 2006, 2008, 2010 3. Percent of aid flows to government that are 90% 95% 95% Annual in-country reported on national budgets assessment by GOT and DPs for JAST review, reported biennially to OECD- DAC Paris survey 4. Percent of donor capacity development support 50% 50% 70% Annual in-country that are provided through coordinated programmes assessment by GOT consistent with national development strategies and DPs for JAST review, reported

24 biennially to OECD- DAC Paris survey 5. a) Percent of donors and of aid flows that use Aid flows: 66% Aid flows: 77% Aid flows: 75% (for Annual in-country partner country public financial management (average of i.-iii.) (average of i.-iii.) national reporting and assessment by GOT systems (i. national budget execution procedures; Donors: 95% Donors: 90% (donors auditing procedures; 95% and DPs for JAST ii. national financial reporting procedures; iii. (donors that use that use at least one for national budget review, reported national auditing procedures) at least one from from i.-iii.) execution procedures/use of biennially to OECD- i.-iii.) exchequer system) DAC Paris survey

5. b) Percept of donors and of aid flows that use Aid flows: 61% Aid flows: Target not Aid flows: 75% Annual in-country partner country procurement systems Donors: 86% yet available, depends assessment by GOT on score for 2.b) and DPs for JAST Donors: Target not yet review, reported available, depends on biennially to OECD- score for 2.b) DAC Paris survey 6. Number of parallel project implementation units 56 19 0 Annual in-country assessment by GOT and DPs for JAST review, reported biennially to OECD- DAC Paris survey 7. Percent of aid disbursements released according 70% 85% 85% Annual in-country to agreed schedules in annual or multi-year assessment by GOT frameworks and DPs for JAST review, reported biennially to OECD- DAC Paris survey 8. Percent of bilateral aid that is untied 95% More than 95% More than 95% Biennial OECD-DAC desk review for Paris survey 2006, 2008, 2010

25 Harmonisation 9. Percent of aid provided as programme-based 55% 66% N/A (not a JAST indicator) Biennial in-country approaches assessment by GOT and DPs for OECD- DAC Paris survey 10. a) Percent of field missions that are joint 17% 40% 40% Annual in-country assessment by GOT 10. b) Percent of country analytic work that is joint 38% 66% 66% and DPs for JAST review, reported biennially to OECD- DAC Paris survey Managing for results 11. Transparent and monitorable results-oriented B A N/A (not a JAST indicator) Biennial World Bank performance assessment frameworks for national HQ assessment for development strategies and sector programmes are OECD-DAC Paris in place survey 2006, 2008, 2010 Mutual accountability 12. Mutual assessments of progress in Yes Yes N/A (not a JAST indicator) Biennial in-country implementing agreed commitments on aid assessment by GOT effectiveness including on Paris Declaration are and DPs for OECD- undertaken DAC Paris survey

26 Annex III: Methodology Note for Measuring JAST Indicators

STILL TO BE COMPLETED

27 i Paris indicator 3 measures whether aid flows are aligned on national priorities. The OECD (Paris Declaration) uses a proxy for this purpose - aid recorded in the national budget as a percentage of actual ODA disbursements to the Government, assuming that recording ODA in the national budget estimates is a first step towards ensuring alignment of aid with national priorities. ii JAST principles are: (1) supporting national, sector and local priorities, strategies, programmes and plans; (2) integration in national budget process; (3) integration in Government structures, systems, regulations and procedures; (4) following proper Government process for project/programme approval.