TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background The need for TMDLs to be conducted in the Chowan River watershed is based on provisions of the Clean Water Act. The document, Guidance for Water Quality-Based Decisions: The TMDL Process (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1999), states:

According to Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and EPA water quality planning and management regulations, States are required to identify waters that do not meet or are not expected to meet water quality standards even after technology-based or other required controls are in place. The waterbodies are considered water quality- limited and require TMDLs.

…A TMDL is a tool for implementing State water quality standards, and is based on the relationship between pollution sources and in-stream water quality conditions. The TMDL establishes the allowable loadings or other quantifiable parameters for a waterbody and thereby provides the basis for States to establish water quality-based controls. These controls should provide the pollution reduction necessary for a waterbody to meet water quality standards

The Blackwater (contained in USGS Hydrologic Unit Code 03010202) (Figure 1.1) and Nottoway (contained in USGS Hydrologic Unit Code 03010201) (Figure 1.2) watersheds drain to the Chowan River basin, and the Albemarle and Lynnhaven-Poquoson watersheds (contained in USGS Hydrologic Unit Codes 03010205 and 02080108, respectively) (Figure 1.3) drain to the Currituck Sound and Chesapeake Bay, respectively. The Blackwater watershed contains impaired segments of Rattlesnake (Creek) Swamp, Mill Swamp, and Cypress Swamp, which include portions of Virginia's Isle of Wight and Surry Counties (Figure 1.4). The Nottoway watershed contains impaired segments of the Nottoway River, Little Nottoway River, Big Hounds Creek, Beaver Pond Creek, Sappony Creek, and Raccoon Creek, which include portions of Virginia’s Dinwiddie, Lunenburg, Nottoway, Prince Edward, Southampton, and Sussex counties (Figure 1.5). The Albemarle watershed contains impaired segments of Nawney Creek, Milldam Creek and West Neck Creek (middle), and includes portions of Virginia Beach City and Chesapeake City; the upper portion of West Neck Creek has recently (2004) been moved from the Albemarle watershed to the

INTRODUCTION 1 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

Lynnhaven-Poquoson watershed, which drains to the Chesapeake Bay, and includes portions of Virginia Beach City. The London Bridge Creek and Canal #2 impairment is in the Lynnhaven-Poquoson watershed. As the Upper West Neck Creek and London Bridge Creek and Canal #2 impaired segments are linked by tidal processes to the impaired segments of the Albemarle watershed, they are included in this report (Figure 1.6). The Blackwater and Nottoway watersheds drain into the Chowan River Basin, which then empties into the Albemarle Sound. The Albemarle watershed drains to the Currituck Sound, which connects with the mouth of the Albemarle Sound. The Lynnhaven-Poquoson watershed drains to the Chesapeake Bay, which empties to the Atlantic Ocean. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) has identified all of these segments as impaired with regard to fecal coliform. For the purposes of this report, all these watersheds shall be referred to as the Chowan Study Area.

Figure 1.1 Location of the Blackwater River watershed.

INTRODUCTION 2 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

Figure 1.2 Location of the Nottoway River watershed.

INTRODUCTION 3 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

Figure 1.3 Location of the Albemarle and Lynnhaven-Poquoson watersheds.

INTRODUCTION 4 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

Figure 1.4 Impaired stream segments in the Blackwater River watershed.

Figure 1.5 Impaired stream segments in the Nottoway River watershed.

INTRODUCTION 5 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

Figure 1.6 Impaired stream segments in the Albemarle and Lynnhaven-Poquoson watersheds.

Table 1.1 lists for each impairment the VADEQ water quality monitoring station used for impaired waters assessment, initial year segment was listed in the Section 303(d) TMDL Priority List and Report, current miles affected in the 2004 listing, fecal coliform violation rates in the 2002 303(d) Report on Impaired Waters and the 2004 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Integrated Report, and location of listing.

The land area of the Blackwater watershed is approximately 288,069 acres, with forest and pasture as the primary land uses (Figure 1.7). The land area of the Nottoway watershed is approximately 922,109 acres, with forest and pasture as the primary land uses (Figure 1.8). The land area of the Albemarle and Lynnhaven-Poquoson watersheds is approximately 306,600 acres, with pasture and wetlands as the primary land uses (Figure 1.9)

INTRODUCTION 6 I

N

T

T

M

R

D O .Table 1.1 Fecal coliform impairments on 2004 Section 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Integrated Report within the Chowan

L

D

River watershed.

U

D

C

e

2002 303(d) List 2004 303(d) List v T

Listing Station Initial Miles e

I

l

O

Stream Name, HUP FC Violation FC Violation Location o

ID Listing Affected p

N

Rate Rate m

e

Beaver Pond Creek, K16 5ABPC000.12 1998 7.17 9/16 9/19 Headwaters to Nottoway River n Big Hounds Creek, K14 5ABHC003.73 2002 10.35 5/27 5/28 Headwaters to Nottoway River t Cypress Swamp, K32 5ACPP003.20 2002 17.1 4/25 N/A Headwaters to Blackwater River Cypress Swamp, K32 5A-PL-SCP1B 2004 N/A 1/9 N/A Headwaters to Blackwater River From Lazaretto Creek Little Nottoway River, K15 5ALNT004.68 2002 9.85 6/27 12/28 downstream to its mouth at the Nottoway River From confluence with Moores Mill Swamp, K34 5AMSW006.77 2002 10.12 3/24 1/10 Swamp to confluence with Rattlesnake Swamp

From headwaters downstream to D

R

Milldam Creek, K41 5BMLD001.92 2002 3.29 7/58 9/50 confluence with North Landing A River. F

T Segment extends 0.08 mile up and 0.92 mile down stream of Nawney Creek, K42 5BNWN001.84 1996 .52+ 5/52 8/44 Nawney road crossing of

C

Nawney Creek h

o

Segment begins one-half mile w

a

upstream of the Nawney Creek n

Nawney Creek, K42 5BNWN000.00 1996 0.06+ 7/51 12/55 Road bridge crossing Nawney R

i

v

Creek e

r

,

From the headwaters to the

V

Nottoway River, K14 5ANTW155.06 1998 17.76 1/6 N/A backwaters of Nottoway Falls A Lake + Units are square miles

7 I

N

T

T

M

R

D

O Table 1.1 Fecal coliform impairments on 2004 Section 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Integrated Report within the Chowan

L D River watershed. (cont.)

U

D

C Listing Station Initial Miles 2002 303(d) List 2004 303(d) List e

v T Stream Name, HUP Location

e

I

ID Listing Affected FC Violation Rate FC Violation Rate l

O

o

p N The entire mainstem of Raccoon Raccoon Creek, K25 5ARCN003.36 2002 19.3 4/21 6/29 m

Creek e

n

From the confluence with t Rattlesnake (Creek) Swamp, 5ARKN006.40 2002 7.5 7/59 2/18 Pouches Swamp to the K34 Blackwater River Sappony Creek, K22 5ASAP013.69 2002 20.19 3/27 2/20 Headwaters to Spiers Pond From Princess Anne Road West Neck Creek (Upper), 5BWNC010.02 1998 3.17 8/59 19/47 crossing to junction with C08 London Bridge Creek southside of Princess Anne Road crossing to widening of West Neck Creek (Middle),

5BWNC003.65 1998 3.1 10/51 9/44 creek approx. 0.55 mi D K41 downstream of Indian River R

A

Road crossing F Segment begins at Ships Corner T London Bridge Creek & ends at confluence of Thurston 7LOB003.70 1994 0.11+ 28/32 27/31 Canal #2 Branch. Includes all of Canal #2. C

h

Segment begins at Ships Corner o

w

London Bridge Creek & ends at confluence of Thurston a 7LOB001.79 1994 0.11+ 33/59 23/51 n

Canal #2 Branch. Includes all of Canal R

i

#2. v

e

r

Segment begins at Ships Corner ,

London Bridge Creek & ends at confluence of Thurston V 7XBO001.30 1994 0.11+ 19/36 22/50 A Canal #2 Branch. Includes all of Canal #2. + Units are square miles

8 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

Figure 1.7 Land uses in the Blackwater River watershed.

Figure 1.8 Land uses in the Nottoway River watershed.

INTRODUCTION 9 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

Figure 1.9 Land uses in the Albemarle and Lynnhaven-Poquoson watersheds.

The National Land Cover Data (NLCD) produced cooperatively between the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was utilized for this study. The collaborative effort to produce this dataset is part of a Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium project led by four U.S. government agencies: U.S. EPA, USGS, the Department of the Interior National Biological Service (NBS), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Using 30-meter resolution Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite images taken between 1990 and 1994, digital land use coverage was developed identifying up to 21 possible land use types. Classification, interpretation, and verification of the land cover dataset involved several data sources when available including: aerial photography; soils data; population and housing density data; state or regional land cover data sets; USGS land use and land cover (LUDA) data; 3-arc second Digital Terrain Elevation Data (DTED) and derived slope, aspect and shaded relief; and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data. Approximate acreages and land use proportions for each impaired segment are given in Table 1.2.

INTRODUCTION 10 I

N

T

T

M

R

D O Table 1.2 Contributing land use area for impaired segments in the Chowan Study Area.

L

D

U Impaired Segment Land Use D

C Commercial Livestock e

v

T

e

I

Water Residential & Services Barren Woodland Pasture Cropland Wetlands Access l

O

o

p N (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres)

m

Nottoway River 698 140 59 2,076 33,100 3,664 393 2,042 63 e

n

Sappony Creek 548 31 184 1,823 24,491 2,126 4,972 1,292 21 t Rattlesnake Swamp 338 50 29 255 14,322 2,008 7,045 7,725 37 Raccoon Creek 601 48 259 1,266 28,324 2,627 5,489 4,866 23 Mill Swamp 266 35 20 161 10,746 2,234 5,090 5,283 25 Little Nottoway River 862 756 340 631 32,381 10,678 733 1,951 185 Cypress Swamp 497 29 11 2,286 25,086 1,693 4,506 3,572 14 Big Hounds Creek 251 383 59 307 11,612 2,321 266 302 26 Beaverpond Creek 118 14 5 29 3,745 1,607 758 30 37 Nawney Creek 119 132 42 0 202 702 2,421 1,063 77 D

R

Milldam Creek 112 0 0 0 140 53 636 1,513 10 A West Neck (Middle) 101 23 8 8 446 126 1,511 1,106 16 F

T West Neck (Upper) 446 2,966 1,407 426 1,279 731 1,521 2,166 156 London Bridge Creek 267 3,037 374 559 637 191 342 419 25

C

h

o

w

a

n

R

i

v

e

r

,

V

A 11 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

The estimated human population within the impaired drainage areas in 2004 is 105,028 with T

M

19,364 dogs and 21,685 cats associated with this population. Table 1.3 lists agricultural D

L

production rankings for counties in Chowan River basin compared to all counties in Virginia. D

e

v

e

Counties in the Blackwater, Nottoway, Albemarle and Lynnhaven-Poquoson River basins are l

o

p home to numerous species of wildlife, including mammals (e.g., beaver, raccoon, white- m

e

n tailed deer) and birds (e.g., wood duck, wild turkey, Canada goose) (Table 1.4). t

Table 1.3 Agricultural production rankings for counties in Chowan Study Area compared to all counties in Virginia. County Rankings Compared to Other Counties in Virginia County / Cattle & City Dairy Beef Horses Layers Broilers Swine Calves D Dinwiddie 61 35 63 55 43 21 N/A R

A

Isle of Wight 67 N/A 66 76 18 13 2 F Lunenburg 43 N/A 45 N/A 7 N/A N/A T Nottoway 43 35 39 60 5 8 N/A Prince Edward 44 28 30 72 9 15 N/A Southampton 63 N/A 59 73 11 12 4 Surry 83 N/A 71 N/A 90 N/A N/A Sussex 73 N/A 76 67 N/A N/A N/A Chesapeake 74 N/A 72 N/A 38 N/A N/A

Virginia Beach 93 N/A N/A 49 47 N/A 9 A

p

p

o

m

a

t

t

Table 1.4 Number of wildlife species, mammal types, and bird types inhabiting o

x

counties and cities within Chowan Study Area. R

i Number of Number of Number of Bird v

e

County / City r

Wildlife Species Mammal Types Types ,

V

Dinwiddie 386 46 172 A Isle of Wight 418 48 203 Lunenburg 345 42 159 Nottoway 332 43 160 Prince Edward 401 43 158 Southampton 403 48 174 Surry 444 48 198 Sussex 391 46 173 Chesapeake 493 51 220 Virginia Beach 557 49 287

For the period from 1972 to 2004, the portion of Chowan River watershed near Camp Pickett, Virginia received average annual precipitation of approximately 46.44 inches, with 53% of the precipitation occurring during the May – October growing season (SERCC,

INTRODUCTION 12 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

2002). Average annual snowfall is 7.9 inches, with the highest snowfall occurring during T

M

January (SERCC, 2004). Average annual daily temperature is 56.4 ºF. The highest average D

L

daily temperature of 86.8 ºF occurs in August, while the lowest average daily temperature of D

e

v

e

24.0 ºF occurs in January (SERCC, 2004). l

o

p

m

e

For the period from 1948 to 2004, the portion of the Chowan River watershed near Town of n

t Stony Creek, Virginia received average annual precipitation of approximately 44.98 inches, with 55% of the precipitation occurring during the May – October growing season (SERCC, 2004). Average annual snowfall is 8.6 inches, with the highest snowfall occurring during February (SERCC, 2004). Average annual daily temperature is 57.9 ºF. The highest average

daily temperature of 90.2 ºF occurs in July, while the lowest average daily temperature of D

R

26.4 ºF occurs in January (SERCC, 2004). A

F

T For the period from 1953 to 2004, the portion of the Chowan River watershed near the Back Bay Wildlife Refuge, Virginia received average annual precipitation of approximately 45.08 inches, with 56% of the precipitation occurring during the May – October growing season (SERCC, 2004). Average annual snowfall is 3.1 inches, with the highest snowfall occurring

A

p

during January (SERCC, 2004). Average annual daily temperature is 59.9 ºF. The highest p

o

m

average daily temperature of 85.9 ºF occurs in July, while the lowest average daily a

t

t

o temperature of 31.7 ºF occurs in January (SERCC, 2004). x

R

i

v

e

r

,

1.2 Applicable Water Quality Standards V

A According to 9 VAC 25-260-5 of Virginia's State Water Control Board Water Quality Standards, the term "water quality standards" means "…provisions of state or federal law which consist of a designated use or uses for the waters of the Commonwealth and water quality criteria for such waters based upon such uses. Water quality standards are to protect the public health or welfare, enhance the quality of water and serve the purposes of the State Water Control Law and the federal Clean Water Act."

As stated in Virginia state law 9 VAC 25-260-10 (Designation of uses),

A. All state waters, including wetlands, are designated for the following uses: recreational uses, e.g., swimming and boating; the propagation and growth of a

INTRODUCTION 13 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

balanced, indigenous population of aquatic life, including game fish, which might T reasonably be expected to inhabit them; wildlife; and the production of edible M

D

and marketable natural resources, e.g., fish and shellfish. L

 D

e

D. At a minimum, uses are deemed attainable if they can be achieved by the v

e

l imposition of effluent limits required under §§301(b) and 306 of the Clean Water o

p Act and cost-effective and reasonable best management practices for nonpoint m

e source control. n

t

G. The [State Water Control] board may remove a designated use which is not an existing use, or establish subcategories of a use, if the board can demonstrate that attaining the designated use is not feasible because:

1. Naturally occurring pollutant concentrations prevent the attainment of the use;

D

R

A

2. Natural, ephemeral, intermittent or low flow conditions or water levels F

prevent the attainment of the use unless these conditions may be compensated T for by the discharge of sufficient volume of effluent discharges without violating state water conservation requirements to enable uses to be met;  6. Controls more stringent than those required by §§301(b) and 306 of the Clean Water Act would result in substantial and widespread economic and social impact.

A

p

p

o

m

a

t

t Section 9 VAC 25-260-170 is the applicable water quality criteria for fecal coliform o

x

R impairments in the Blackwater, Nottoway, Albemarle, and Lynnhaven-Poquoson watersheds. i

v

e

r

,

V

Prior to 2002, Virginia Water Quality Standards specified the following criteria for a non- A shellfish supporting waterbody to be in compliance with Virginia's fecal standard for contact recreational use:

A. General requirements. In all surface waters, except shellfish waters and certain waters addressed in subsection B of this section, the fecal coliform bacteria shall not exceed a geometric mean of 200 fecal coliform bacteria per 100 ml of water for two or more samples over a 30-day period, or a fecal coliform bacteria level of 1,000 per 100 ml at any time.

If the waterbody exceeded either criterion more than 10% of the time, the waterbody was classified as impaired and the development and implementation of a TMDL was indicated in

INTRODUCTION 14 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

order to bring the waterbody into compliance with the water quality criterion. Based on the T

M sampling frequency, only one criterion was applied to a particular datum or data set. If the D

L

sampling frequency was one sample or less per 30 days, the instantaneous criterion was D

e

v

e

applied; for a higher sampling frequency, the geometric criterion was applied. This was the l

o

p criterion used for listing the impairments included in this study. Sufficient fecal coliform m

e

n bacteria standard violations were recorded at VADEQ water quality monitoring stations to t indicate that the recreational use designations are not being supported.

EPA has since recommended that all states adopt an E. coli or enterococci standard for fresh water and enterococci criteria for marine waters by 2003. EPA is pursuing the states'

adoption of these standards because there is a stronger correlation between the concentration D

R of these organisms (E. coli and enterococci) and the incidence of gastrointestinal illness than A

F with fecal coliform. E. coli and enterococci are both bacteriological organisms that can be T found in the intestinal tract of warm-blooded animals. Like fecal coliform bacteria, these organisms indicate the presence of fecal contamination. The adoption of the E. coli and enterococci standard is now in effect in Virginia.

A

p

The new criteria, outlined in 9 VAC 25-260-170, read as follows p

o

m

a

t

t A. In surface waters, except shellfish waters and certain waters identified in o

x

subsection B of this section, the following criteria shall apply to protect primary R

i contact recreational uses: v

e

r

,

V

1. Fecal coliform bacteria shall not exceed a geometric mean of 200 fecal coliform A bacteria per 100 ml of water for two or more samples over a calendar month nor shall more than 10% of the total samples taken during any calendar month exceed 400 fecal coliform bacteria per 100 ml of water. This criterion shall not apply for a sampling station after the bacterial indicators described in subdivision 2 of this subsection have a minimum of 12 data points or after June 30, 2008, whichever comes first.

2. E. coli and enterococci bacteria per 100 ml of water shall not exceed the following:

Geometric Mean1 Single Sample Maximum2

Freshwater3 E. coli 126 235

INTRODUCTION 15 TMDL Development DRAFT Chowan River, VA

3

Saltwater and Transition Zone T enterococci 35 104 M

D

L 1

For two or more samples taken during any calendar month. D 2 No single sample maximum for enterococci and E. coli shall exceed a 75% upper one-sided confidence limit e

v based on a site-specific log standard deviation. If site data are insufficient to establish a site-specific log e

l

o

standard deviation, then 0.4 shall be used as the log standard deviation in freshwater and 0.7 shall be as the log p standard deviation in saltwater and transition zone. Values shown are based on a log standard deviation of 0.4 in m

e freshwater and 0.7 in saltwater. n 3 See 9 VAC 25-260-140 C for freshwater and transition zone delineation. t

These criteria were used in developing the bacteria TMDLs included in this study.

D

R

A

F

T

A

p

p

o

m

a

t

t

o

x

R

i

v

e

r

,

V

A

INTRODUCTION 16

Recommended publications