Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) for CSIS-118B
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) for CSIS-118B
SLO #1: Assess the advantages and disadvantages of the two major computer architectures.
Course Objective(s) covered
Describe the differences between the Von Newman and Harvard computer architectures
Department Learning Outcome covered:
Apply systems concepts in the investigation, evaluation, and resolution of information technology problems
Institutional Learning Outcome covered:
The student will reason and think critically.
SLO #2 Demonstrate the use of general purpose register for parameter passing.
Course Objective(s) covered:
Understand the general-purpose registers and their uses.
Department Learning Outcome covered:
Apply systems concepts in the investigation, evaluation, and resolution of information technology problems
Institutional Learning Outcome covered:
The student will reason and think critically.
SLO #3: Compose an assembly program that will handle an x86 hardware interrupt.
Course Objective(s) covered:
An in-depth understanding of interrupt handling and exceptions
Department Learning Outcome covered:
Apply systems concepts in the investigation, evaluation, and resolution of information technology problems
Institutional Learning Outcome covered:
The student will reason and think critically. Assessment Rubric for CSIS 118B Computer Organization and Assembly Language
This Rubric will be used to assess student learning outcomes based on learning domain categories using varying levels.
Learning Domain St Does Not Meet: 0 Appro Meets: 3-4 Exceeds: 5 Score: Category (LDC) ud aches: 0-5 en 1-2 t no t pr es en t (N /A ) Knowledge No evidence for knowledge Recalls Identifies most CIS definitions, Identifies significant CIS some principles, methodologies and definitions, principles, CIS theories accurately methodologies and theories content accurately and definiti ons but not always accurat ely Understand No evidence for Explai Explains/demonstrates CIS ideas, Explains/demonstrates CIS understanding ns/dem concepts and principles with ideas, concepts and principles onstrat some accuracy and relevant accurately and relevant examples es CIS examples ideas, concep ts and princip les with limited accura cy and irrelev ant exampl es Application No evidence for application Applie Applies CIS knowledge and Applies CIS knowledge and s CIS concepts with some degree of reasoning with consistently and knowle consistently and accuracy accuracy dge and concep ts with little consist ency or accura cy Analysis No evidence for analysis Breaks Breaks down theories, Breaks down theories strategies, down strategies, and methods into their and methods into their elements theorie elements with minimal difficulty with accuracy s, strategi es, and metho ds into their elemen ts with difficul ty Synthesis No evidence for synthesis Integra Integrates relevant knowledge Integrates relevant knowledge tes from diverse CIS perspectives from diverse CIS perspectives relevan with some depth and breadth with depth and breadth t knowle dge from diverse CIS perspe ctives with little depth and breadt h Evaluation No evidence for evaluation Deter Determines with some degree of Demonstrates ability to assess mines effectiveness CIS theories, the effectiveness of CIS theories, with a policies, or choices in problem policies, or choices in problem minim solving solving al degree of effecti veness CIS theorie s, policie s, or choice s in proble m solving