Jack Krebs, President, Kansas Citizens for Science June 11, 2006 [email protected] , 785-840-5113

Hello. I’m Jack Krebs, president of Kansas Citizens for Science.

Last month Kathy Martin handed out an article entitled “The Truth of Science and of Revelation” from the Catholic magazine “Columbia.”

I would like to thank Mrs. Martin for distributing this article, because it supports a major point that we at Kansas Citizens for Science believe: that there is not a conflict between accepting the theory of evolution and believing in God.

Here is what the article says about Catholic doctrine:

“Believing that God designed the world doesn’t mean you have to reject Darwinism or any other scientific explanation… The Church has always taught that natural processes and the laws that govern them are themselves part of God’s design. … It is quite acceptable to say that evolution by natural selection is the way God did it.”1

However, the Intelligent Design advocates such as John Calvert claim that one cannot accept both evolution and God. In a new pamphlet entitled “Character Assassination and Denigration of Theism,” Calvert says that Kansas Citizens for Science has been a “tool” used to “promote a materialist world view that seeks to demean the idea of creation, … effectively promoting non- theistic religions and world views over traditional theistic views. ”2

This is categorically false. Kansas Citizens for Science does not promote any particular religious view. We do not promote materialism, nor do we promote non-theistic over theistic religions.

Board members of KCFS include an evangelical Christian, a Presbyterian minister, and other Protestants, Catholics, Jews, Unitarians, agnostics and atheists. Science can and does accommodate all those religious beliefs, and more. We believe that science is a limited form of knowledge, and that many essential matters of morals, values and spiritual belief fall outside the realm of science.

Calling us materialists and atheists just because we support mainstream evolutionary theory is a blatant falsehood, and those of us with other religious beliefs object to being characterized as such.

John Calvert has been instrumental in developing and promoting your science standards. Therefore, I want to go on public record here, in front of you, in asking that Calvert quit making these false accusations that those of us who accept modern science and evolutionary theory can’t also accept God. Many tens of thousands of religious Kansans would be offended, I am certain, to find themselves being called “tools of atheism” because of their support of science.

Kansas Citizens for Science firmly believes that science, as the “activity of seeking natural explanations about what we observe in the world around us,”3 is both the best way of learning about the physical world and is fully compatible with a wide diversity of religious beliefs, including traditional Christian beliefs about God.

1. “The Truth of Science and Revelation,“ Columbia magazine, June 2006 2. “Character Assassination and Denigration of Theism to Promote Belief in Unguided Evolutionary Change,” Intelligent Design network, June 17, 2006 3. Kansas Science Standards Writing Committee’s Recommended Standards, January 21, 2006 [Note that this sentence was removed in the Board’s science standards.]