LANG 4030 Assessment Criteria for Presentation 2 (App Review)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LANG 4030 Assessment Criteria for Presentation 2 (App Review)

Name: ______Section: ______

LANG 4030 Assessment criteria for Presentation 2 (app review)

Task achievement (group) Vocabulary & Grammar (individual) Delivery skills (individual)

Excellent The app is very well-selected to interest a mixed Your vocabulary is at an appropriate Your individual section has a very clear mini- technical and non-technical audience, and is level of technicality for the audience. introduction and conclusion and natural and described in appropriate detail. The overview to the Descriptive language is very well used to fluent transitions and handover. presentation generates interest in the app, and the convey the special features of the app. overall structure maintains the interest of a mixed Cohesion is very well achieved, using You use appropriate rhythm and intonation to technical and non-technical audience throughout. appropriate spoken language. You may deliver a highly effective presentation. Your The presentation conveys the key features and make one or two errors in grammar, use of non-verbal communication* effectively benefits of the app very persuasively, with word choice and word form. enhances your presentation. appropriate evidence. The demo effectively complements the presentation.

Very good The app is well-selected to interest a mixed Your vocabulary is at an appropriate Your individual section has a mini-introduction technical and non-technical audience, and is level of technicality for the audience. and conclusion and effective transitions and presented in appropriate detail. The overview to the Descriptive language is very well used to handover. presentation is engaging. The overall structure convey the special features of the app. conveys the key features and benefits of the app Cohesion is achieved, using appropriate You pronounce words clearly and your rhythm persuasively, with appropriate evidence. The demo spoken language. You make occasional and intonation are appropriate. Your use of effectively complements the presentation. errors in grammar, word-choice and word non-verbal communication* is natural and form. appropriate.

Good The app is well-selected to interest a mixed Your vocabulary is at an appropriate Your individual section has a mini-introduction technical and non-technical audience, and is level of technicality for the audience most and conclusion and your transitions and presented in appropriate detail. The overview to the of the time. Descriptive language is used handover are effective though they may be a presentation is appropriate but could be more to convey the special features of the app. little clumsy. engaging. The overall structure conveys the key You make some errors in word-choice features and benefits of the app effectively but not and word form. You make a few You make occasional pronunciation errors and very persuasively. The demo complements the repeated grammatical errors your rhythm and intonation are mainly presentation. appropriate. Your use of non-verbal . communication* is appropriate.

Satisfactory The app is well-selected to interest a mixed Your vocabulary is adequate for the task Your individual section has a mini-introduction technical and non-technical audience, but some of and mainly appropriate for the audience. and conclusion, transitions and a handover, the attractive features of the app may need more You may often use inappropriate but these may be clumsy or unnatural. elaboration. The overview to the presentation is descriptive language and make other appropriate but could be more engaging. The overall errors in word choice and word form. You You pronounce most words clearly but may structure conveys the key features and benefits of make frequent errors in grammar but you make some systematic errors. Your rhythm the app effectively but not persuasively. The demo are understandable. and intonation, and your use of non-verbal complements the presentation most of the time. communication* are mainly appropriate. You are understandable. Below The app is only of interest to a limited audience and Your vocabulary is limited and may be Your individual section lacks a mini- satisfactory does not have wide appeal. The description does too technical or too simplistic for the introduction or conclusion, or appropriate not persuade the audience that this app is relevant audience. You make frequent errors in transitions or handover. to them and the review is not very convincing. The grammar, word-choice and word form. overview may be inappropriate and the structure is Sometimes you are not understandable. You may make many pronunciation errors, and not always logical. Parts of the demo may not be sometimes you are not understandable. Your related to the presentation. The presentation may be rhythm and intonation are often inappropriate rather short. (perhaps because you are reading from notes). Your use of non-verbal communication* is mainly appropriate. Poor The app is only of interest to a limited audience and Your vocabulary is very limited. You only Your presentation lacks a mini-introduction or does not have wide appeal. The description does use high-frequency words and phrases. conclusion, or appropriate transitions or not persuade the audience that this app is relevant You make many errors in grammar, handover. to them and the review is not based on evidence. word-choice and word form. Often your There may be no overview. The structure is not presentation is hard to follow. Many words are not pronounced clearly and logical. The demo may have little relevance to the your rhythm and intonation are often presentation. inappropriate. Your use of non-verbal communication* may not be appropriate. Often you are not understandable.

Very poor The app appears to be of little interest or value and You make so many errors in grammar, Your presentation lacks a mini-introduction or the review may not be based on evidence. The word-choice and word form that you are conclusion, or appropriate transitions or structure is not logical and the presentation is hard very hard to understand. handover. to follow. The demo is absent or not appropriate. Your use of non-verbal communication* may not be appropriate. You are often not understandable.

* Non-verbal communication = speed and volume of voice; eye-contact and gestures, audience awareness and sincerity.

COMMENTS:

Recommended publications