University of Texas at Arlington s2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Texas at Arlington s2

University of Texas at Arlington School of Social Work

Human Behavior and the Social Environment I SOCW 3302-001-002 ONLINE Spring 2010 Course Outline Instructor: Alexa Smith-Osborne, Ph.D., L.C.S.W., A.C.S.W.

Time/Place of Class: Mondays/Wednesdays 2-3:20 p.m. in SWCA 308 Office Hours: SWCA 301E Mondays 1-2:00 p.m., 3:30-4:30 p.m. Phone: 817-272-0452 Fax: 817-272-2028 Email: [email protected] Course WebCT: http://webct.uta.edu/SCRIPT/socw3302001sp10/scripts/serve_home Faculty weblog: http://blog.uta.edu/~alexaso

I. UTA Syllabus Distribution Requirement

Students must be given access to a course syllabus (either hardcopy or electronically) by the end of the first week of each fall and spring semester and by the second class day for each short semester (e.g., summer sessions, Wintersession, or Maymester). A copy must also be placed in the departmental office.

II. CSWE, EPAS Content Policy: Human Behavior and the Social Environment

Social work education programs provide content on the reciprocal relationships between human behavior and social environments. Content includes empirically based theories and knowledge that focus on the interactions between and among individuals, groups, societies, and economic systems. It includes theories and knowledge of biological, sociological, cultural, psychological, and spiritual development across the life span; the range of social systems in which people live (individual, family, group, organizational, and community); and the ways social systems promote or deter people in maintaining or achieving health and well-being.

III. Course Description

Undergraduate Catalog: One of three required human behavior courses that explores, within the context of a strengths and empowerment perspective, knowledge of the bio-psycho- social development of persons and families from birth through death.

Expanded: The Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) requires that social work students attain knowledge in the Human Behavior and the Social Environment (HBSE) foundation courses on the biopsychosocial development of individuals and the range of social systems in which individuals live. It is the intent of this course to provide some of this knowledge. This course, Human Behavior and the Social Environment II (HBSE SOCW 3302) is one of three required human behavior (HBSE) courses in the BSW Program. The other courses are Human Behavior and the Social Environment I (HBSE SOCW 3301) and Human Behavior and Diverse Populations (SOCW 3317). This course explores the behavioral and social science knowledge related to the development of individuals and families through the life course (e.g., biological and social research evidence and the theories of Freud, Erikson, Piaget, and others). In addition, theoretical perspectives that facilitate understanding of human behavior (e.g., Cognitive Theory, Feminist Theory, Social Learning Theory, Dynamic Systems Theory, the Ecosystems Perspective, and others) will be explored. Students will explore (a) the role that culture and cultural identity play in human development and norms of behavior; (b) relevant concepts of genetics and neurobiology to facilitate understanding of human functioning at the biological level; and (c) the diversity of views which facilitate the professional social worker's understanding of class, culture, diversity, ethnic identification, oppression, populations-at-risk, race, sexual orientation, social and economic justice. Liberal Arts Perspective. This perspective is demonstrated in the concentrated focus on the person-environment context and diverse groups of persons, the requirement of understanding one's cultural heritage and that of persons from other cultures, and the advancement in one's methods of thinking about and critiquing systems of inquiry about human behavior. Vertical and horizontal links to curriculum. Vertically, this course lays a key piece of the foundation for advanced courses in the curriculum. We will look at the interaction of persons, social policies, community development, research, and practice. Horizontally, the course intersects with every course taught at UTA. There is no subject that does not address individuals and the systems in which they operate.

IV. UTA-School of Social Work: Definition of Evidence-Informed Practice:

Evidence-informed practice (EIP) is a guiding principal for the UTA-SSW. This approach is guided by the philosophy espoused by Gambrill (2006) and others who discuss evidence-based practice (EBP). Though many definitions of EIP/EBP saturate the literature, we offer two definitions that most closely define our understanding of the concept and serve to explicate our vision of EIP for the UTA-SSW:

The use of the best available scientific knowledge derived from randomized, controlled outcome studies, and meta-analyses of existing outcome studies, as one basis for guiding professional interventions and effective therapies, combined with professional ethical standards, clinical judgment, and practice wisdom (Barker, 2003, p. 149). …..the integration of the best research evidence with our clinical expertise and our patient’s unique values and circumstances (Strauss, et al. (2005).

The UTA SSW vision statement states that the “School’s vision is to promote social and economic justice in a diverse environment.” Empowerment connects with the vision statement because, as Rees (1991) has pointed out, the very objective of empowerment is social justice. Empowerment is a seminal vehicle by which social justice can be realized. It could well be argued that true social justice cannot be realized without empowerment. Empowerment, anchored with a generalist base, directs social workers to address root causes at all levels and in all contexts, not simply “symptoms”. This is not a static process but an ongoing, dynamic process, a process leading to a greater degree of social justice and equality.

UTA-School of Social Work: Accepts the Definition of Empowerment as defined by Barker (2003:142) as follows:

In social work practice, the process of helping individuals, families, groups, and communities increase their personal, interpersonal, socioeconomic, and political strength and develop influence toward improving their circumstances.

Competency-based Performance Outcomes: By the end of the semester, students should be able to demonstrate the following practice behaviors, comprised of knowledge, values, and skills

1. Apply critical thinking skills within the context of professional social work practice. 2. Understand the value base of the profession and its ethical standards and principles, and practice accordingly. 3. Practice without discrimination and with respect, knowledge, and skills related to clients’ age, class, color, culture, disability, ethnicity, family structure, gender, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex, and sexual orientation. 4. Understand the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination and apply strategies of advocacy and social change that advance social and economic justice. 7. Use theoretical frameworks supported by empirical evidence to understand individual development and behavior across the life span and the interactions among individuals and between individuals and families, groups, organizations, and communities. I. Graduates will engage in life-long learning and activities to update and improve professional knowledge and skills.

This course relates to and advances the program objectives by providing HBSE course content in the knowledge base and theories on human development of persons and families across the life span and across diverse environmental contexts.

A. Apply biopsychosocial development of individuals across the life course and as they live in families, groups, organizations, social institutions, and communities. B. Apply evidence and theoretical frameworks for understanding human development and the interactions among various systems and between individuals and social systems. C. Analyze the effect of social systems on human behavior as well as the impact of human behavior on various social systems. D. Recognize ways social systems promote or block the achievement and maintenance of optimal health and well-being. Strength's based and empowerment-based approaches will be emphasized for the promotion of these goals. E. Synthesize ways of evaluating theories, and their application to client situations. This will include identification of traditional and alternative assessment approaches and application of course content to practice, including clinical, community, and social welfare policy and services. F. Recognize content on the promotion of social and economic justice (understanding the dynamics and consequences of human oppression and discrimination across the life span). G. Recognize populations-at-risk (patterns and dynamics of discrimination, economic deprivation, and oppression on groups distinguished by age, ethnicity, class, sexual orientation, religion, and physical or mental ability and the impact of discrimination, economic deprivation, and oppression upon biopsychosocial development in members of these groups). H. Apply content on diversity, including the differences and similarities in experiences, needs, and beliefs in groups distinguished by race, ethnicity, culture, class, gender, sexual orientation, religion, physical or mental ability, age, and national origin. I. Apply values and ethics regarding biopsychosocial theories and developmental evidence. Students are to develop awareness of their personal values and clarify conflicting values and ethical dilemmas about course content.

VII. Performance Measures.

By the end of the semester, the student will have achieved the following:

A. Articulate in writing assignments, class discussions, and examination experiences knowledge of selected theories of the biopsychosocial development of individuals B. Articulate in writing assignments, class discussions, and examination experiences knowledge and understanding of the range of social systems, interactions among them, and interactions among individuals and social systems. Demonstrate the capacity to apply social systems and ecological theoretical approaches to case situations. C. Articulate in class discussion, writing assignments, and examination experiences knowledge of strengths based and empowerment based approaches and their implications for achievement and maintenance of optimal health and well-being. D. Articulate in class discussions and written assignments the capacity to assess practice situations from the perspective of diversity, and the similarities and differences in experiences, needs, and beliefs among diverse groups. E. Demonstrate, through written work, the capacity to assess practice situations in terms of social and economic oppression, and discrimination in populations-at-risk. F. Articulate in class discussions, and in written work, potential sources of conflict in values and ethics regarding the course content. Demonstrate self-awareness in identifying personal conflicts regarding persons from diverse populations and willingness to rethink biased or otherwise negative views in respect to professional contacts and experiences, and rethink discriminatory behaviors. Commit to appreciation of human diversity.

VIII. Course Format.

The course will focus on the following topic areas:

A. The social work profession, values and resultant ethical obligations, and their influence on professional assessment and practice interventions. B. Traditional and alternative paradigms for understanding the human condition, and which influence the professional assessment experience. C. Systems Theory, its concepts, and its connection to the professional social work experience. D. Psychological and Sociological Theories - broadening the social work professional’s understanding of individuals, families, groups and communities.

IX. Texts.

A. Required. Hutchison, E.D. (3008). Dimensions of human behavior: The changing life course (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

B. Required. .Robbins, .P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E.R. (2006). Contemporary human behavior theory: A critical perspective for social work. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

C. Recommended. Ginsberg, L., Nackerud, L., & Larrison, C.R. (2004). Human biology for social workers. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Articles (on e-reserve, not listed in APA style):  American Indian elders: Unifiers of Indian families, Red Horse, J.G., Social Casework, Vol 61, 1980, pp. 490-497.  Beyond Coping: An Empowerment Perspective on Stressful Life Events, Gutierrez, Lorraine M., Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, Vol 21, 1994, pp. 201-219.  Cognitive therapy: A 30 year retrospective, Beck, A.T., American Psychologist, Vol 46 (4), 1991, pp. 382-389.  Genetic Family Histories, Bernhardt, B., & Rauch, J., Families in Society, Vol 74, 1993, pp. 195-205.  In a Different Voice: Women's conceptions of self and morality, Gutierriez, L.M., Harvard Educational Review, Vol 49, 1977, pp. 431-446.  Islands of the living dead: The social geography of McDonalidization, Ritzer, G, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol 47 (2), pp. 119-136.  Mental health and women's multiple roles, Piechowski, L.D., Families in Society, Vol 73, 1992, pp. 131-141.  The social work ethics audit: A risk-management strategy, Reamer, F.G., Social Work, Vol 45(4), 2000, pp. 355-366.  Theorizing globalization, Kellner, D., Sociological Theory, Vol 20(3), 2002, pp285-305.  Violence and Biology: A Review of the Literature, Johnson, Harriette C., Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 1996, pp. 3-18. Additional readings will be assigned from WebCT, professional journal sources, and book chapters.

X. Course Requirements and Grading.

Students will be evaluated throughout the semester on experiential and written assignments, examinations, class participation and attendance. An overall grade will be based on a students' performance in the following areas:

Class participation. Participation is considered a crucial aspect of learning course material. Participation in class should reflect an understanding of, or questions about, assigned reading, the integration of such with personal and professional experiences, and the desire to broaden one’s professional knowledge base. Please become familiar with the NASW Code of Ethics. It establishes the foundation for respect of each other and the evolving perspectives we might share throughout the semester.

The impact on your grade in this area will be a response to respecting and encouraging the opinions of peers, even if they do not represent your own; demonstrating the ability to read carefully and think critically; demonstrating the ability to speak up when you have a point to make, a question to pose, or an alternative perspective to present; being prepared to give and accept feedback; and being prepared to work with colleagues. Major Writing Assignments (Student Learning Objectives A-I). Two major writing assignments will be given during the semester. The first will be an opportunity to apply up-to-date knowledge of biological human development and its interaction with environmental influences on human development to a specific life stage or trajectory of your choice. . 5-10 pages (APA style) with references. Examples of topics include: 1) Biological underpinnings for addressing child maltreatment of children in a specific life stage (e.g., infancy, school-age, adolescence) 2) Biological underpinning for juvenile justice program models (e.g., latency age, adolescence). 3) Implications of the nature of early development of the central nervous system for child-rearing practices (e.g., neonatal, infancy, toddlerhood). 4) Implications of changes with aging in the central nervous system for social support systems for the elderly. 5) Biological underpinnings for recovery models in substance abuse, as applied to a specific life stage according to Erikson’s or Vaillant’s theoretical stages.

The second will be an opportunity to apply concepts related to developmental tasks expected in the early life, middle age, and elderly life stages to the life experiences of an individual you have interviewed who is in the midst of life’s later stages. The analysis is to be informed by a discussion and critical analysis (following the model provided at the end of each chapter of your Robbins, Chatterjee, & Canda text) of multiple relevant theories of human behavior and development in the social environment. 10-15 pages (APA style) with references.

Examinations (Student Learning Objectives A-I). Two Examinations will be given during the semester. They will be made up of a variety of short answer and essay questions from reading assignments and lectures.

Grading.

The following list of course requirements and percentages will be utilized in determining final course grades:

Examination I 30% of grade 30 Points Paper I 15% of grade 15 Points Examination II 25% of grade 25 points Paper II 30% of grade 30 Points

Total 100% 100 Points

Course Grading Scale.

The following scale will be used for calculating an overall course grade:

Grade Percentage Points A 100% - 90% 100 - 90 B 89% -80% 89 - 80 C 79% -70% 79 - 70 D 69% - 60% 69 - 60 F 59% and below 59 - 0 Late Assignments/Papers. All assignments must be turned in on the scheduled due date, at the beginning of class. Late assignments will be assigned a five (5) point penalty for each day late. Late assignments will be accepted up to five (5) days after the scheduled due date.

Dropping the Class. If you choose to drop this course at any point during the semester, please be attentive to specific University calendar dates established for completing this process. It is the student’s responsibility to complete the necessary paperwork according to the University’s schedule. Not doing so will result in a failing grade.

Student Support Services. The University supports a variety of student success programs to help you connect with the University and achieve academic success. They include learning assistance, developmental education, advising and mentoring, admission and transition, and federally funded programs. Students requiring assistance academically, personally, or socially should contact the Office of Student Success Programs at 817:272-6107 for more information and appropriate referrals.

Academic Dishonesty. Academic dishonesty is a completely unacceptable mode of conduct and will not be tolerated in any form at the University of Texas at Arlington. All persons involved in academic dishonesty will be disciplined in accordance with University regulations and procedures. Discipline may include suspension or expulsion from the University. “Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, collusion, the submission for credit of any work or materials that are attributable in whole or in part to another person, taking an examination for another person, any act designed to give unfair advantage to a student or the attempt to commit such acts” (Regents’ Rules and Regulations, Part One, Chapter VI, Section 3, Subsection 3.2, Subdivision 3.22).

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you are a student who requires accommodations in compliance wit the ADA, please consult with the instructor at the beginning of the semester. Faculty members are required by law to provide “reasonable accommodation” to students with disabilities, so as not to discriminate on the basis of that disability. The student’s responsibility is to inform the instructor of the disability at the beginning of the semester and provide documentation authorizing the specific accommodation. Student services at UTA include the Office for Students with Disabilities (located in the lower level of the University Center) that is responsible for verifying and implementing accommodations to ensure equal opportunity in all programs and activities.

Bomb threats. If anyone is tempted to call in a bomb threat, be aware that UTA will attempt to trace the phone call and prosecute all responsible parties. Every effort will be made to avoid cancellation of presentations/tests caused by bomb threats. Unannounced alternate sites will be available for these classes. Your instructor will make you aware of alternate class sites in the event that your classroom is not available.

XI. Class Schedule (*readings are from required texts)

Unit I: Theory and Practice Relevance. Why study theory for practice?

Classes 1-4. What is a theory and why and how to study them; the person-environment and biopsychosocial framework; the ecosystems perspective; social construction of differences and concepts relating culture, human development, and personality.

* Ashford, J.B., Lecroy, C.W., & Lortie, K.L. (2006). Human behavior in the social environment: A multidimensional perspective (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. Chapters 1-3 by Class 2. *Robbins, .P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E.R. (2006). Contemporary human behavior theory: A critical perspective for social work. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Chapters 1-7 by Class 4.

Ginsberg, L., Nackerud, L., & Larrison, C.R. (2004). Human biology for social workers. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Chapters 1-2.

On reserve or WebCT:

Ungar, M. (2003). Deep ecology and the roots of resilience: The importance of setting in outdoor experience-based programming for at-risk children. Critical Social Work, 3(1), 18-43.

Exam I.

Unit II: Complex Adaptive Systems in Human Development: The biopsychosocial framework.

Classes 4-6. Theories and the current knowledge base on individual development: biological underpinnings; prenatal, birth, infancy. *Van Wormer, Chapter 4 to p. 127.

Ginsberg et. al, Chapters 4-5.

On reserve or WebCT:

Bernhardt, B & Rauch, J. (1993). Genetic family histories: An aid to social work assessment. Families in Society, 74, 195-205. Mange,E.J. & Mange, A.P. (1999). Basic human genetics (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA.: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Chapters 1-4.

In class: Diamond, M.C., Scheibel, A.B., & Elson, L.M. (1985). The human brain coloring book. Oakville, CA.: HarperPerennial. Units 1-1 to 2-4.

Paper I.

Classes 7-10. The psychophysiology of behavior and cognition through the life span; toddlerhood, pre-school, school-age, pre-puberty .

*Van Wormer, Chapter 4 to p.141.

Ginsberg et. al, Chapters 6-7, 10-12.

On reserve or WebCT:

Excerpts from Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Johnson, H.C. (1996). Violence and biology: A review of the literature. Families in Society, 77(1), 3-18.

Mange,E.J. & Mange, A.P. Chapter 11.

Diamond et al., Unit 3

Classes 11-12. Theories of cognitive-behavioral change and emotional, moral, and spiritual development through the life span; adolescence and young adulthood.

*Van Wormer, rest of Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 to p. 177.

*Robbins et al., Chapters 8, 11, 12.

Ginsberg et. al, Chapter 3, pp.45-51.

On reserve or WebCT:

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Chapters 1-3.

Beck, A.T. (1991). Cognitive therapy: A 30 year retrospective. American Psychologist, 46, 382- 389.

Coles, R. (1990). The spiritual life of children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Excerpts you choose. Coles, R. (1991). The moral life of children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Excerpts you choose.

Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 431-446.

Gutierriez, L.M. (1994). Beyond coping: An empowerment perspective on stressful life events. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 21, 201-219.

Thyer, B.A. & Myers, L.L. (1998). Social learning theory: An empirically-based approach to understanding human behavior in the social environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1, 23-32.

In class: Diamond et al., Unit 8-1 to 8-4.

Classes 13-14. Middle age; Family development in the social environment.

*Van Wormer, Chapter 5 to p. 185 and Chapter 6.

*Robbins et al., Chapter 9.

On reserve or WebCT:

Lasch, C. (1990 November). The invasion of family by the market. The World & I, 479-489.

Lasch, C. (1991). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. (pp.237-249 on WebCT)

Piechowski, L.D. (1992). Mental health and women’s multiple roles. Families in Society, 73, 131-141.

Red Horse, J.G. (1980). American Indian elders: Unifiers of Indian families. Social Casework, 61, 490-497.

Paper II. Classes 14-15 Old age, death & dying, bereavement; Linkage with Social Institutions, Organizations, Community, and the Impact of Globalization.

Exam 2.

*Van Wormer, rest of Chapter 5 and Epilogue

On reserve or WebCT:

Bharadwaj, L., Nilson, S., Judd-Henrey, I., Ouellette, G., Parenteau, L., Tournier, C. et al. (2006). Waste disposal in First-Nations communities : The issues and steps toward the future. Journal of Environmental Health, 68, 35-39. Kellner, D. (2002). Theorizing globalization. Sociological Theory, 20(3), 285-305.

Ortiz, L., & Smith, G. (1999). The role of spirituality in empowerment practice. In W. Shera & L.M. Wells (Eds.), Empowerment practice in social work: Developing richer conceptual frameworks (307-319). Toronto, CA: Canadian Scholars Press.

Ritzer, G. (2003). Islands of the living dead: The social geography of McDonaldization. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(2), 119-136.

Specht, H. (1986). Social support, social networks, social exchange and social work practice, Social Service Review, 60, 218 – 240.

Ungar, M. (2003). Deep ecology and the roots of resilience: The importance of setting in outdoor experience-based programming for at-risk children. Critical Social Work, 3(1), 18-43.

Bibliography

Bharadwaj, L., Nilson, S., Judd-Henrey, I., Ouellette, G., Parenteau, L., Tournier, C. et al.

(2006). Waste disposal in First-Nations communities : The issues and steps

toward the future. Journal of Environmental Health, 68, 35-39.

Beaudoin, T. (1998). Virtual faith: the irreverent spiritual quest of Generation X. San Francisco:

Jossey-Bass.

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. New York; Basic Books.

Brooks, D. (2001). Bobos in paradise. New York: Touchstone.

Cannon, T.D., Rosso, I.M., Bearden, C.E., Sanchez, L.E., & Hadley, T. (1999). A prospective

cohort study of neurodevelopmental processes in the genesis and epigenesist of

schizophrenia. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 1, 467-485.

Cichetti, D. & Cannon, T.D. (1999). Neurodevelopmental processes in the ontogenesis and

epigenesis of psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 375-393.

Colby, V. (1970). The Singular Anomaly. New York: New York University Press. Coles, R. (1990). The spiritual life of children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Coles, R. (1991). The moral life of children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Coles, R. (1997). The moral intelligence of children. New York: Random House.

Cramer, E. and S. F. Gilson (1999). "Queers and crips: Parallel identity development processes

for persons with nonvisible disabilities and lesbian/gay, and bisexual, persons." Journal of

Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity 4(1): 23-37.

Daining, C. (2005). Resilience of Youth in Transition from Out-of-Home Care to Adulthood.

Unpublished Dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animal. New York: Philosophical

Library.

Deal, K. H. (2000). The usefulness of developmental stage models for clinical social work

students: an exploratory study. The Clinical Supervisor, 19(1), 1-19.

Deal, K. H. (2002). Modifying field instructors' supervisory approach using stage models of

student development. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22(3/4), 121-137.

DeForge, B., Belcher, J., O'Rourke, M., & Lindsey, M. (2005). Personal resources and

homelessness in early life: Predictors for depression in consumers of homeless multi-

serviced centers. Manuscript submitted for publication.

D'Imperio, R. L., Dubow, E. F., & Ippolito, M. F. (2000). Resilient and stress-affected

adolescents in an urban setting. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 129-142.

Dubow, E. F., Schmidt, D., McBride, J., Edwards, S., & Merk, F. L. (1993). Teaching children to

cope with stressful experiences: initial implementation and evaluation of a primary

prevention program. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 428-440. Dubow, E. F., Tisak, J., Causey, D., Hryshko, A., & Reid, G. (1991). A two-year longitudinal

study of stressful life events, social support, and social problem-solving skills:

contributions to children's behavioral and academic adjustment. Child Development, 62,

583-599.

Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course and human development. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 939-983). New York: John Wiley &

Sons, Inc.

Erikson, E. (1962). Young man Luther: a study in psychoanalysis and history. New York:

Norton.

Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed., Rev.). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.,

Inc.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.

Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.

Erikson, E.H. (1969). Gandhi's truth: on the origins of militant nonviolence. New York: Norton.

Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. In (Ed.), The standard edition of the

complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (vol. 7 ed., pp. 125-145). London:

Hogarth.

Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Dell.

Friedan, B. (1977). It changed my life. New York: Dell.

Friedan, B. (1993). The fountain of age. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Garmezy, N. (1991). Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist, 34, 416-430. Garmezy, N., & Rutter, M. (Eds.). (1983). Stress, Coping, and Development in Children. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. George, L. K. (1993). Sociological perspectives on life transitions. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 353-373. Gesell, A. L. (1925). The mental growth of the preschool child. New York: Macmillan. Gilligan, C. (1978). Woman's place in man's life cycle. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 481- 517. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gilligan, C., Rogers, A. G., & Tolman, D. L. (Eds.). (1991). Women, girls and psychotherapy: reframing resistance. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Greene, R.R. (2007). Social work practice: A risk and resilience perspective. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. Greenspan, S. I. (1992). Infancy and early childhood: the practice of clinical assessment and intervention with emotional and developmental challenges. Madison,CT: International Universities Press, Inc.. Gunnar, M. R., & Thelen, E. (Eds.). (1989). Systems and development: the Minnesota symposia on child psychology , vol.22. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hall, G. H. (1904). Adolescence: its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex crime, religion, and education. New York: Appleton & Co..

Haroutunian, S. (1983). Equilibrium in the balance: A study of psychological explanation. New York: Springer-Verlag. Herrenkohl, T.I., Hill, K.G., Chung, I., Guo, J., Abbott, R.D., & Hawkins J.D. (2003). Protective factors against serious violent behavior in adolescence: A prospective study of aggressive children. Social Work Research, 27, 179-191. Hoffman, L., Paris, S., Hall, E., & Schell, R. (1988). Developmental psychology today (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.. Holleran, L. K., Kim, Y., & Dixon, K. (2004). Innovative approaches to risk assessment within

alcohol prevention programming. In A. R. Roberts & K. R. Yeager (Eds.), Evidence-

based practice manual: research and outcome measures in health and human services

(pp. 677-684). New York: Oxford University Press.

Hrabowski, I., Freeman A., Maton, K. I., Greene, M. L., & Greif, G. L. (2002). Overcoming the

odds: Raising academically successful African-American young women. New York:

Oxford University Press.

Hrabowski, I., Freeman A., Maton, K. I., & Greif, G. L. (1998). Beating the odds: Raising

academically successful African American males. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Krause, N., & Morgan, D. (2002). Religious trajectories and transitions

over the life course. International Journal on Aging and Human Development, 55(1), 51-

70.

Jackson, Y., & Warren, J. S. (2000). Appraisal, social support, and life events: predicting

outcome behavior in school-age children. Child Development, 71, 1441-1457.

Jew, C. L., Green, K. E., & Kroger, J. (1999). Development and validation of a measure of

resiliency. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 32, 1-15.

Jung, C. G. (1965). Memories, dreams, and reflections. New York: Vintage Books.

Kellner, D. (2002). Theorizing globalization. Sociological Theory, 20(3), 285-305.

Knox, D., Langehough, S. O., Walters, C., & Rowley, M. (1999). Religiosity and spirituality

among college students. College Student Journal, 33, 430-432.

Lam, D. (1999). Parenting stress and anger: the Hong Kong experience. Child and Family Social

Work, 4, 337-346.

Lasch, C. (1990 November). The invasion of family by the market. The World & I, 479-489. Lasch, C. (1991). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations.

New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Lavee, Y., McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. (1985). The double ABCX model of family stress

and adaptation: An empirical test by analysis of structural equations with latent variables.

Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 811-825.

Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: a history of changing outlooks.

Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1-21.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

LeCuyer-Maus, E. A. (2003). Stress and coping in high-risk mothers: difficult life circumstnces,

psychiatric-mental health symptoms, education, and experiences in their families of

origin. Public Health Nursing, 20, 132-145.

Longo, D. A., & Peterson, S. M. (2002). The role of spirituality in psychosocial rehabilitation.

Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 25, 333-340.

Luthar, S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The contruct of resilience: A critical evaluation

and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.

Macias, M. M., Clifford, S. C., Saylor, C. F., & Kreh, S. M. (2001). Predictors of parenting stress

in families of children with spina bifida. Children's Health Care, 30, 57-65.

Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent

psychology (pp. 159-187). New York: Wiley-Interscience.

Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and

unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American

Psychologist, 53, 205-220. McCubbin, H. I., & Dahl, B. B. (1976). Prolonged family separation in the military: A

longitudinal study. In H. I. McCubbin, B. B. Dahl & E. J. Hunter (Eds.), Families in the

military system. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

McCubbin, H. I., Dahl, B. B., Lester, G. R., Benson, D., & Robertson, M. L. (1976). Coping

repertoires of families adapting to prolonged war-induced separations. Journal of

Marriage and the Family, 38, 461-471.

McCubbin, H. I., Hunter, E. J., & Dahl, B. B. (1975). Residuals of war: Families of prisoners of

war and servicemen missing in action. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 95-109.

McCubbin, H. I., Joy, C. B., Cauble, A. E., Comeau, J. K., Patterson, J. M., & Needle, R. H.

(1980). Family stress and coping: a decade review. Journal of Marriage & the Family,

42(4), 855-871.

McCubbin, H. I. & Figley, C. R. (1983). Stress and the family: Coping with normative

transitions. New York, Bruner Mazel.

McCubbin, M. A., & McCubbin, H. I. (1996). Resiliency in families: A conceptual model of

family adjustment and adaptation in response to stress and crises. In H. I. McCubbin, A.

I. Thompson & M. A. McCubbin (Eds.), Family assessment: Resiliency, coping, and

adaptation---Inventories for research and practice (pp. 1-64). Madison, Wisconsin:

University of Wisconsin System.

McGee, M., Nagel, L., & Moore, M. K. (2003). A study of university classroom strategies aimed

at increasing spiritual health. College Student Journal, 37, 583-594.

McQuaide, S. (1998). Women at midlife. Social Work, 43(1), 21-30. Morrison, G. M., Robertson, L., Laurie, B., & Kelly, J. (2002). Protective factors related to

antisocial behavior trajectories. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 277-290.

Murray, C. (2003). Risk factors, protective factors, vulnerability, and resilience: A framework

for understanding and supporting the adult transitions of youth with high-incidence

disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 16-26.

Musil, C.M. (2000). Health of grandmothers as caregivers: A ten month follow-up. Journal of

Women & Aging, 12, 129-145.

Naerde, A., Tambs, K., & Mathiesen, K. S. (2002). Child-related strain and maternal mental

health: a longitudinal study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 105, 301-309.

Neugarten, B. L. (1985). Interpretive social science and research on aging. In A.S. Rossi (Ed.), Gender and the life course (pp. 291-300). New York: Aldine. Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (1975). Development through life: a psychosocial approach. Homewood, ILL.: The Dorsey Press. Norman, S. M., McCluskey-Fawcett, K., & Ashcraft, L. (2002). Older women's development: a comparison of women in their 60's and 80's on a measure of Erikson's developmental tasks. International Journal on Aging and Human Development, 54, 31-41. Norman, W. H., & Scaramella, T. J. (Eds.). (1980). Mid-life: developmental and clinical issues.

New York: Brunner/Mazel.

Ortiz, L., & Smith, G. (1999). The role of spirituality in empowerment practice. In W. Shera &

L.M. Wells (Eds.), Empowerment practice in social work: Developing richer conceptual

frameworks (307-319). Toronto, CA: Canadian Scholars Press.

Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution.

Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Patterson, G. T. (2003). Examining the effects of coping and social support on work and life

stress among police officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 215-226.

Patterson, J. M. (2002). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of

Marriage and Family, 64, 349-360.

Postrel, V. (2003). The Substance of Style. New York: Harper Collins.

Quamma, J. P., & Greenberg, M. T. (1994). Children's experience of life stress: the role of

family social support and social problem-solving skills as protective factors. Journal of

Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 295-305.

Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical

Psychology, 58, 307-321.

Ritzer, G. (2003). Islands of the living dead: The social geography of McDonaldization.

American Behavioral Scientist, 47(2), 119-136.

Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (1998). Contemporary human behavior theory.

Needham Heights,MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Rolf, J., Masten, A. S., Cicchetti, D., Nuechterlein, H. H., & Weintraub, S. (Eds.). (1990). Risk

and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. Cambridge, England:

Cambridge University Press.

Rutter, M. (1983). Cognitive deficits in the pathogenesis of autism. Journal of Child Psychology

and Psychiatry,24, 513-531.

Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of

Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316-331.

Rutter, M. (1993). Resilience: some conceptual considerations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 14,

626-631. Rutter, M. (1999a). Psychosocial adversity and child psychopathology. The British Journal of

Psychiatry, 174, 480-493.

Rutter, M. (1999b). Resilience concepts and findings: Implications for family therapy. Journal of

Family Therapy, 21, 119-144.

Rutter, M. & the English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team. (1998). Developmental

catch-up, and deficit, following adoption after severe global early privation. Journal of

Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 465-476.

Rutter, M., Quinton, D., & Hill, J. (1990). Adult outcomes of institution-reared children: Males

and females compared. In L.N. Robins & M. Rutter (Eds.). Straight and devious

pathways from childhood to adulthood (pp. 135-157). Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Saleebey, D. (1992). The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.

Saltman, J.E. (2002). Theory and practice in social work: Two perspectives on reality. Arete, 26,

84-99.

Saltman, J.E.E. & Greene, R.R. (1993). Social workers’ perceived knowledge and use of human

behavior theory. Journal of Social Work Education, 29, 88-98.

Santrock, J. W. (1989). Life span development (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: W.C. Brown.

Schafft, K. A. (2006). Poverty, residential mobility, and student transiency within a rural New

York school district. Rural Sociology, 71, 212-231.

Shanahan, M. J. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: variability and

mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 667-692.

Sheehy, G. (1976). Passages. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co.,Inc.. Smith, C., & Carson, B. E. (1997). Stress, coping, and resilience in children and youth. Social

Service Review, 6, 231-256.

Smith, P. L. (2003). Adaptive coping strategies of othermothers: an examination of social

support, spirituality, stress, and depression. University of Maryland Baltimore:

Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

Smith-Osborne, A. (2005a). Antecedents to postsecondary educational attainment for individuals

with psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis. Best Practices in Mental Health: An

International Journal, 1, 15-30.

Smith-Osborne, A. (2005b). Comparative theoretical perspectives on a social problem:

Psychopathology and middle-class teen female shoplifters. Journal of Evidence-Based

Social Work, 2, 73-84.

Smith-Osborne, A. (2006). Mental Health Risk Factors and Protective Mechanisms for Post-

Secondary Educational Attainment among Young Adult Veterans. Unpublished doctoral

dissertation, University of Maryland at Baltimore.

Smith-Osborne, A. (in press). Use of meta-analysis to study resilience factors: An exemplar. In

M. Unger & L. Liebenberg (Eds.), Researching Youth Across Cultures and Contexts.

Toronto, CA.: University of Toronto Press.

Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Spina, S. U. (2000). The network orientations of highly resilient urban

minority youth: a network-analytic account of minority socialization and its educational

implications. The Urban Review, 32, 227-261.

Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: the history of America's future, 1584-2069. New

York: William Morrow. Streever, K.L. & Wodarski, J.S.(1984). Life span developmental approach: Implications for

practice. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 267-278.

Sutker, P. B., Davis, J. M., Uddo, M., & Ditta, S. R. (1995). War zone stress, personal resources,

and PTSD in Persian Gulf War returnees. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 444-

452.

Thelen, E. (1987). We think, therefore we move. Current Psychology of Cognition, 7, 195-198.

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition

and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Thoits, P. A. (1983). Life stress, social support, and psychological vulnerability: epidemiological

considerations. Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 341-362.

Ungar, M. (2003). Deep ecology and the roots of resilience: The importance of setting in outdoor

experience-based programming for at-risk children. Critical Social Work, 3(1), 18-43.

Unger, Michael. (2004). A constructionist discourse on resilience: Multiple contexts, multiple

realities among at-risk children and youth. Youth & Society, 35, 341-365.

Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaption to life. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co..

Vaillant, G. E. (1993). The wisdom of the ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univerity Press.

Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the Odds: High Risk Children from Birth to Adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. West, L., Mercer, S. O., & Altheimer, E. (1993). Operation Desert Storm: The response of a

social work outreach team. Social Work in Health Care, 19, 81-98.

White, B. L. (1975). The first three years of life. New York: Avon.

Winterowd, C. L., Street, V. L., & Boswell, D. L. (1998). Perceived social support, disability

status, and affect in college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 13, 53-

70.

25

Recommended publications