Acts 15—Ebooksept2019 FINAL 2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Living in the Promises of Jesus Acts 15 Lesson 11
Living in the Promises of Jesus Acts 15 Lesson 11 OBSERVATION: Read Acts 15 1. After reading through these verses, what would you say to someone if they asked you what they are about? 2. Key words help us to better understand the verses. We have listed below a group of key words. Mark each one in a distinctive way Key Words: God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, all references to Paul, Barnabas, and believe/saved/gospel DIVISION OVER CIRCUMSCISION: Read Acts 15:1-5 1. People adding to God’s requirements for salvation have been a problem for thousands of years. What was the requirement taught by certain men who came down from Judea? a. Underline the phrase you cannot be saved in your answer above. Record Paul's words to the Galatians in Galatians 1:9. 1.) Why is it so important not to add or detract from the gospel? 2. What are the components of the gospel? (What must one do to be saved?) See Romans 10:9-10 a. What are some other requirements some people add to the gospel? b. What are some ways people take away from the gospel/state people can be saved by less than what the gospel requires? 1 3. According to Acts 15:2, what was the response of Paul and Barnabas? 4. What did they decide to do to resolve the dissension? Acts 15:2,3 a. They passed through Phoenicia and Samaria, two non-Jewish regions. What did they describe/declare to the people in these regions? b. What was the result? 5. -
Acts 15:22-35
Acts 15:22-35 – The Jerusalem Letter (Galatians 1:1-6) James concludes the Jerusalem Council saying we do not want to make the Gentiles follow the Jewish Law, but we do need to address some things concerning the Jewish customs since the Law of Moses has been taught in every city where the Jews have gone and it will continue to be taught every Sabbath. Acts 15:22 – The radical branch of Christian Judaism had lost the hold on the church during a council that was overseen by the Apostles and Pastor James. There does not appear to be any negative fallout and no church split since Acts 15:22 says “the whole church” agreed to send this council’s decision to Antioch. The Apostles (Peter, John, Andrew, etc. still in Jerusalem) and Elders (James the brother of the Lord, etc.) choose Judas Barsabbas and Silas to return to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas. Acts 15:23 – A letter was drafted and sent along that summarized the Jerusalem Council’s decision and vision. - This Jerusalem Letter was sent in the name of the “Apostles and Elders” and with apostolic authority - It was sent to Antioch in Syria and the province of Cilicia. (It is not sent to Paul’s churches of Galatia, but in Acts 16:4 Paul used this “Jerusalem Letter” addressed to Syria and Cilicia as the authoritative Word of God in the Galatian churches, also: “As they traveled from town to town, they delivered the decisions reached by the apostles and elders in Jerusalem for the people to obey. -
Sermon NotesMay 12, 2019 Focus Good Shepherd Sunday with A
Sermon Notes May 12, 2019 Focus Good Shepherd Sunday with a focus on Acts 9 (Tabitha / Dorcas) Lectionary Readings http://www.lectionarypage.net/YearC_RCL/Easter/CEaster4_RCL.html I am not going to focus on “Jesus the good shepherd” in preaching so much as I’m going to invite us to be good shepherds. Tabitha /Dorcas was a good shepherd both before she died and after she was raised in Acts chapter 9. Her resurrection story is an important evolution of Jesus’ role as shepherd. Resurrection and new life help us to be a shepherd. Sidenote I offer you a couple of links to some striking Good Shepherd art. ● Asian artists Asian art of the Good Shepherd. ● Global artists Global art of the Good Shepherd Resurrection stories beyond Jesus’s resurrection (Tabitha is one of them) ● Widow of Nain’s son (Luke 7:11-17). Jesus raised this young man literally in the middle of his funeral procession. The text says it’s her only son and she’s a widow. Jesus’ fame spreads widely because of this act of power and care. It might’ve spread too widely because his approach is much more private with Jairus’ daughter ● Jairus’ daughter (Luke 8:49-56). Jesus raised the synagogue leader’s daughter in the presence of the parents, Peter, James, and John in a separate room. Then, Jesus does this curious thing by insisting no one says anything. Maybe he just wants people to own the power of God themselves instead of offloading it all the time onto him? ● Tabitha (Tabitha is Aramaic. -
The Jerusalem "Apostolic Decree" in Acts 15:1-35
The Jerusalem "apostolic decree" in Acts 15:1-35 Author: Patrick Ogbonyomi Alemayo Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108451 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2019 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. THE JERUSALEM “APOSTOLIC DECREE” IN ACTS 15:1-35 By Rev. Patrick Ogbonyomi ALEMAYO, C.S.Sp. A Thesis submitted to Boston College in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Award of the Licentiate in Sacred Theology (S.T.L.) Degree, Boston College School of Theology and Ministry, Brighton, MA, U.S.A. April 30, 2019 Primary Co-Mentor: Professor Christopher R. Matthews Co-Mentor: Rev. Professor Thomas D. Stegman, S.J. DEDICATION This work is dedicated to Very Rev. Fr. Dr. Ayodele Ayeni, C.S.Sp. Provincial Superior Congregation of the Holy Spirit Province of Nigeria North-West Abuja, Nigeria with Fraternal Love and Gratitude 2 ABSTRACT The strict historical reading of the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15:1-35 is a problematic in scholarship. This raises the question of the purpose of the Jerusalem “Apostolic Decree” in Luke’s narrative of the Jerusalem Council. This study argues that Luke’s purpose of the Decree in Acts (15:20, 29; [also found in 21:25]) is not for a pure historical evolution of the Christian mission from Jerusalem to the Gentile world, but refers to a theological and social etiology, founded on divine choice, the Mosaic law, and the prophets, that Luke promulgates as four prohibitions, which have practical values for Luke’s community in creating the conditions necessary for enabling the table-fellowship between Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians. -
Read Chapter 1 & 3
[TS – title page] Copyright © 2010 by Phil Moore. STRAIGHT TO STRAIGHT TO THE HEART OF ACTS The right of Phil Moore to be identiLied as author of this work has been Sixty Bite-Sized Insights THE HEART OF asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents PHIL MOORE Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval Acts system, without permission in writing from the publisher. First published in the UK in 2010 by Monarch Books (a publishing imprint of Lion Hudson plc) Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, England Tel: +44 (0)1865 302750 Fax: +44 (0)1865 302757 Email: [email protected] www.lionhudson.co m 60 BITE-SIZED INSIGHTS ISBN 978 1 85424 989 0 Distributed by: UK: Marston Book Services, PO Box 269, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4YN Phil Moore USA: Kregel Publications, PO Box 2607, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49501 Unless otherwise stated, Scripture quotations taken from the Holy Bible, New International Version , copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by the International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan and Hodder & Stoughton Limited. All rights reserved. The “NIV” and “New International Version” trademarks are registered in the United States Patent and Trademark OfLice by International Bible Society. Use of either trademark requires the permission of International Bible Society. UK trademark number 1448790. The text paper used in this book has been made from wood independently certiLied as having come from sustainable forests. -
The Bible in 100 Words
God created Adam disobeyed Noah arked Abraham went Covenant made Moses called Pharaoh plagued Sea divided Commandments guided Promise landed Judges led David trusted David busted Solomon prayed God provided Kings ruled God desires Prophets warned Messiah promised Hope rose Jesus born God enfleshed Son grew John baptized The sermon series at Great Bridge Presbyterian Church for 2015-2016 Satan tempted was entitled “The Bible in 100 Words.” The goal of the series was to Disciples called express the main events of the Bible, Genesis to Revelation, in 50 Love talked word pairs, which are listed to the right. People healed Jesus revealed Each Sunday we introduced the word pair accompanied by a Disciples prepared supporting Scripture. We often provided a weekly handout that Jesus rode covered additional events that occurred “in the meantime” Judas betrayed Peter denied between each Sunday’s words. The handouts were also used to Anger crucified provide further explanation or give more detail about the event Love rose described by the word pair. Thomas doubted Peter restored This booklet contains each word pair, an accompanying Scripture Mission imparted excerpt, and the material provided in the weekly bulletin inserts, Jesus departed which appears as gray-shaded excurses. Jesus remembered Disciples waited Many thanks to Steve Bowser, Charlotte Gibson, Anita Herbert, Spirit blew John Lynch, Judi Rogers, and Pam Suter for providing the content Peter preached for these handouts. Thanks as well to Christal Marshall for Church grew designing the logo for the series. And finally, thanks also to Charity Leaders equipped Stephens who composed a song inspired by the series, and to Joelle Paul wrote Doriani for the choral arrangement. -
A Chronology of the Apostle Paul
Dr. J. Paul Tanner Pauline Chronology Page 1 A CHRONOLOGY OF THE APOSTLE PAUL J.Paul Tanner,ThM,PhD 2nd Edition:February25,2003 INTRODUCTION Any attempt toreconstruct a chronology for the events inthe life of Paul must admit to some degree of approximation, thoughwe can"come close" todating certainaspects of the Apostle's life. Inreviewing the scholarship of others,twokeydecisions have strong bearing onmost everything else.The first is the date that one presumes for the crucifixion of Christ. For the purposes of this study, I will follow the commendable work of HaroldHoehner,anduse the date of AD 33for our Lord's death. 1 The secondis the date of Paul's ministry at Corinth. Acts 18:12 mentions that Paul was brought before Gallio who was proconsul of Achaia (lower Greece). The year of his office was from early summer of AD 51 to early summer of AD 52. Thus,Paul's stay inCorinthhadto overlap with the administrationof Gallio. Although most scholars agree onthis date for Gallio,they differ over the exact years that Paul was inCorinth. Had Paul recently arrived in Corinth when Gallio took office, or was he already near the conclusion of his Corinthianministry (which lastedat least 18months − Acts 18:11)? Hence,some will date Paul's arrival in Corinthas early as Dec AD 49,while others will date it inthe spring of AD 51. Most attempts toreconstruct a chronology for Paul's life will be made as a result of working backward and forward from the date of Paul'stimeinCorinth.Thisaccountsfora slightdifferenceof ayearortwoinmostschemes. Inevitably,one must alsomake certainassumptions oncertain other matters. -
A Sharp Disagreement (Acts 15:36-41)
A Sharp Disagreement ACTS 15:36-41 Baxter T. Exum (#1294) Four Lakes Church of Christ Madison, Wisconsin December 21, 2014 Most of us here this morning understand that when good people get together, they will nearly always disagree in matters of personal opinion: Coke vs. Pepsi, McDonald’s vs. Burger King, Ford vs. Chevy, and so on. The possibilities are truly endless. It is impossible for two people to be in a close relationship and to never disagree on anything. We even think of identical twins, sharing the identical genetic makeup: Do identical twins ever disagree on anything? Obviously, they do! Disagreeing is a natural part of this life. We think of marriage, the most intimate of all human relationships. The way I look at it is: If a married couple agree with each other on absolutely everything, then one of them is not necessary. God made all of us very different, we look around us, and we know from personal experience that disagreements are quite common. With this challenge in mind, I would like for us to consider a passage this morning where two of the most godly men in the Bible had such a strong disagreement with each other that they actually had to separate for a time. The Bible, in fact, describes it as being a “sharp disagreement.” The passage is found in Acts 15:36-41 (p. 1730). I am referring, of course, to Paul and Barnabas. There is a tremendous value to studying this passage, because we know that even when strong Christians disagree in matters of personal opinion, the consequences can truly be significant for eternity if those disagreements are not handled in an appropriate way. -
A Narrative Analysis of the Jerusalem Council Discourses: Table Fellowship and the Implicit Theology of Salvation
A NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE JERUSALEM COUNCIL DISCOURSES: TABLE FELLOWSHIP AND THE IMPLICIT THEOLOGY OF SALVATION MICHAEL MAHAN This study undertakes a narrative reading of the text of Acts 15:1-31 and develops the construct of implicit theology, defining it as generic, usually unspoken ideas about the theological realm that have a measurable effect on individual and congregational behavior. The reading of the Jerusalem council narrative (Acts 15:1-31) highlights three points of view regarding law, grace, and fellowship considerations. This study finds that one chief thread of the narrative is the issues of the practical matter of fellowship between Gentiles and law-following Jewish Christians. The practical issues in the narrative reveal the main narrative thread of the contrast of differing perspectives on the theology of salvation. Based on the council narrative, it is suggested that in applied settings, the implicit theology of salvation is a balance between grace and law rather than a dichotomous, theological position. This study proposes the development of instruments measuring implicit theology in congregational studies, potentially revealing implicit theological tenets underlying observable congregational characteristics. The Jerusalem consultation, recounted in Acts 15:1-31, describes a significant practical issue regarding the integration of Gentile Christians into what had been a Journal of Biblical Perspectives in Leadership 5, no. 1 (2013), 39-62. © 2013 School of Business & Leadership, Regent University ISSN 1941-4692 Mahan/JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVES IN LEADERSHIP 40 primarily Jewish body of believers. The issues seemed to have been multiple1 and necessitated the assembly of a significant portion of the early church’s leadership structure. -
ACTS NOTEBOOK Ozark Christian College—NT 150 Compiled by Mark E
ACTS NOTEBOOK Ozark Christian College—NT 150 Compiled by Mark E. Moore, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1:1 Introduction to Acts .......................................................................................................4 1:1 People, Places, Events, & Prophecies in Acts .............................................................15 1:1 Archaeology and the Book of Acts ..............................................................................19 1:1 Characteristics of the Book of Acts .............................................................................22 1:2 Apostles in Acts ...........................................................................................................23 1:2 A Brief Synopsis of the Twelve ...................................................................................26 1:3 Resurrection Appearances ...........................................................................................29 1:3 Theology of the Resurrection in Acts ..........................................................................30 1:4 Notes on the Kingdom of God .....................................................................................31 1:9 Ascension .....................................................................................................................33 1:13 Miscellaneous Comments on the List of Apostles .......................................................34 1:15 Church Growth in Acts ................................................................................................35 -
The Apostolic Decree and Our Meat Menu: Reading Acts 15 in Redemptive- Historical Perspective
THE APOSTOLIC DECREE AND OUR MEAT MENU: READING ACTS 15 IN REDEMPTIVE- HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE P.H.R. (Rob) van Houwelingen Theological University of Kampen, Netherlands ABSTRAK: Keputusan sidang Yerusalem mengenai umat percaya kafir – bahwa mereka harus menjauhkan diri, diantaranya, dari daging dengan darah yang masih ada dan dari percabulan – secara resmi dituliskan supaya dijalankan oleh komunitas Kristen mula-mula (Kis. 15). Hal ini bergema dalam surat-surat Paulus, karena instruksi rasuli ini ditujukan kepada umat percaya non-Yahudi seperti kita. Preskripsi dari Yerusalem bukanlah hal yang merupakan insidentil, tapi berakar pada prinsip-prinsip dasar akan hidup yang dicipta, dan hal ini secara umum ditaati pada abad-abad permulaan. Tetapi, kebanyakan orang Kristen sekarang tidak merasa terbelenggu dengan aturan alkitab ini dan tidak memiliki permasalahan dengan memakan pudding darah ataupun daging steak yang mentah. Tujuan dari artikel ini adalah untuk menjelaskan, mengapa, seiring waktu, Dekrit Rasuli ini dianggap menjadi tak berlaku. Di dalam gereja dengan jumlah orang Kristen non Yahudi yang makin bertambah, keharusan dekrit ini secara sejarah penebusan telah berakhir keberadaannya. KATA KUNCI: Sidang Yerusalem, sejarah penebusan, orang Kristen non Yahudi, VERBUM CHRISTI, Vol. 2, No. 1, April 2015 25 makan darah, pemberhalaan. ABSTRACT: The decision of the Jerusalem Council concerning Gentile believers – that they had to abstain, among other things, from meat with blood still in it and from sexual immorality – was officially recorded in order to be obeyed in the early Christian communities (Acts 15). It is echoed in Paul’s letters, because this apostolic instruction was intended for non-Jewish believers like us. The prescription from Jerusalem was by no means incidental, it is rooted in basic principles of created life, and it was generally observed during the first centuries. -
Acts 15: the Council of Jerusalem (49/50)
ACTS 15: THE COUNCIL OF JERUSALEM (49/50) Eternal Father, In Your Divine Providence, You called men like St. Paul to fulfill Your promise to extend Your gift of salvation to all of mankind. It is a mission that began with the faithful remnant of the Jewish men and women who were Jesus' disciples and Apostles and continues in the Church today. Give us the spiritual strength and wisdom we need, Lord, to give our witness of Christ to our families, our friends and neighbors and to support the missionary efforts of the Church in reaching other peoples throughout the world. Inspire our faith communities to follow the example of the generous spirit of the Christians of the Church at Antioch who sent St. Paul and his companions across Asia Minor and Greece to establish churches that called hundreds of Gentiles to accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. We pray in the name of God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen. IMPORTANT BACKGROUND TO THIS CHAPTER: - God sends Cornelius to Peter (10:1-8) - Peter’s vision (10:9-16) - Holy Spirit descends on the Gentiles, Peter baptizes them (10:44-48 o “Can any one forbid water for baptizing these people who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” (10:47) - Peter explains to the Church at Jerusalem 11:1-18 o “If then God gave the same fight to them as he gave to us when we believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could withstand God?”.(11:17) o When they heard this they were silenced.