Feedback & Critical Incidence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Feedback & Critical Incidence

1

05-863/08-763/46-863: Introduction to Human Computer Interaction for Technology Executives Heuristic Evaluation Report Template

Dated MM/DD/YYYY

Prepared By:

YOUR NAME: Brad Myers

SIGNATURE :

Evaluation Of:

Name of system being evaluated (if any): Old CDW website

Person who created the system being evaluated: N/A

2 Page 1 of 8 3 Feedback & Critical<< Record your observations in the table on the following page, based on your observations Incidence and notes taken during the user test Description of columns in the table are as follows: Prototype Screen/Page: Which screen of the user interface was being tested at the point of feedback/critical incidence/problem.

Name of Heuristic: Which of the 10 heuristics is being referenced. Enter the full name of the heuristic. Here is a list: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html

Reason for negative feedback / breakdown: Explain the reasons why the interface violates or upholds this heuristic. Be sure to be clear about where in the screen you are referencing.

Scope: Describe the scope of the feedback or the problem; include whether the scope of the issue is throughout the product or within a specific screen or screens. If the problems are specific to a page, include the appropriate page numbers.

Severity (H/M/L) : Your assessment as to whether the implication of the feedback is low, medium, or high severity, and a justification for why you are giving it that rating.

Way(s) to rectify and Tradeoffs (i.e., why the fix might not work): Suggestion for the modifications that might be made to the user interface to address the issue or issues in this row. You MUST include trade-offs to be credible. If you can’t think of some bad trade-off, say so.

Action taken and Justification: DO NOT FILL IN THIS COLUMN. This will be filled in by the person who created the system being evaluated, to say what he did with respect to the recommendations you make.

1 2

4 Page 2 of 8 5 3 4 5

6 Page 3 of 8 7 # Prototype Name of Reason for negative Scope Severity Way(s) to rectify and any Action taken and Screen Heuristic feedback / breakdown (High/ Medium/ Low) Tradeoffs (i.e., why the fix Justification and Justification for might not work) (to by filled in later by the giving it that rating person who created the system being evaluated) Consistency Inconsistent placement Every Rating: Low – Move the button on one of “Add to Cart” product Minor, cosmetic of the sites to be in the 05-863/08-763/46buttons:-863: Introduction The “Add to to page.Human problem.Computer Rationale: Interaction same for place Technology as on the Executives

Cart” button is below Unlikely that users other site. Tradeoff: This the itemHeuristic in CDW but Evaluationwill have Report trouble Templatemay result in an above in CDW-G. with finding or inconsistency with recognizing the something else, but button. unknown what that might Dated be. MM/DD/YYYY

Prepared By:

YOUR NAME: See Picture 1

SIGNATURE :

Evaluation Of:

Name of system being evaluated (if any):

Person who created the system being evaluated:

8 Page 4 of 8 9 # Prototype Name of Reason for negative Scope Severity Way(s) to rectify and any Action taken and Screen Heuristic feedback / breakdown (High/ Medium/ Low) Tradeoffs (i.e., why the fix Justification and Justification for might not work) (to by filled in later by the giving it that rating person who created the system being evaluated)

2 See Picture 2

3 See Picture 3

4 See Picture 4

10 Page 5 of 8 11 # Prototype Name of Reason for negative Scope Severity Way(s) to rectify and any Action taken and Screen Heuristic feedback / breakdown (High/ Medium/ Low) Tradeoffs (i.e., why the fix Justification and Justification for might not work) (to by filled in later by the giving it that rating person who created the system being evaluated)

5 See Picture 5

6 See Picture 6

7 See Picture 7

12 Page 6 of 8 13 # Prototype Name of Reason for negative Scope Severity Way(s) to rectify and any Action taken and Screen Heuristic feedback / breakdown (High/ Medium/ Low) Tradeoffs (i.e., why the fix Justification and Justification for might not work) (to by filled in later by the giving it that rating person who created the system being evaluated)

8 See Picture 8

6 7 8Picture 1: 9

10 11 12 13 14Picture 2: 15 16<< insert picture 2 here >> 17 18 19

14 Page 7 of 8 15 20Picture 3: 21 22<< insert picture 3 here >> 23 24 25 26Picture 4: 27 28<< insert picture 4 here >> 29 30 31 32Picture 5: 33 34<< insert picture 5 here >> 35 36Picture 6: 37 38<< insert picture 6 here >> 39 40 41Picture 7: 42 43<< insert picture 7 here >> 44 45 46Picture 8: 47 48<< insert picture 8 here >> 49 50

16 Page 8 of 8

Recommended publications