Juvenile Accountability Block Grant

1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .2. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3. JUVENILE JUSTICE PROGRAMS 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.4. JU VENILE ACCOUNTA BILITY BLOCK GRANT 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.5. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.6. FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2013 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .7. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .8. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .9. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .10. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .11. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .12. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 .13.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.

2 APPLICATION GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2. Appl ications due by: December 6, 2013, 5:00 P.M. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.4. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.5. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.6. South Carolina Department of Public Safety 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.7. Office of Highway Safety and Justice Programs 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.8. Post Office Box 1993 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.9. Blythe wood, SC 29016

3 CONTENTS 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.10. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.12...... I. ...Introduction...... 1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.13...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.14...... II...... Purpose...... 1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.15...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.16...... III. Eligible Applicants.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.17...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.18...... IV. Eligible Program Areas...... 1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.19...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.20...... V. Funding Period...... 2 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.21...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.22...... VI. Distribution of JABG Funds.2 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.23...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.24...... VII...... Matching Requirement.3 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.25...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.26.VIII. Notice of New Post Award Reporting Requirements3 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.27...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.28...... IX. Guidelines for the Use of JABG Funds3 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.29...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.30...... X. Application Review and Evaluation Process...... 4 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.31...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.32...... XI. Evaluation Plan...... 5 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.33...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.34...... XII. Grant Application

4 and Review Schedule...... 6 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.35...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.36...... XIII...... Grant Application/Proposa l Review Check List ...... 6 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.37...... 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.38...... XIV. Appendices...8 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.39...... A.JABG Priority Program Areas B. FY2013 Federal Performance Measures C. Grant Application Proposal Scoring Form D. Sample Programs 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.40.

5 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.41. JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.42. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.43. FFY13 Application Guidelines and Procedures 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.44. I. Introduction 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2. The SC Department of Public Safety, Office of Highway Safety and Justice Programs (OHSJP), has been designated to administer the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) program. The purpose of the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) Program is to support state and units of local government in strengthening their juvenile justice systems. The Governor’s Juvenile Justice Advisory Council, serving as the State Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition, has developed a funding plan and priorities within the 17 program areas. (Refer to Appendices A and B for specific information.) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.4. II. Purpose 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.5. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.6. This document provides potential applicants with program criteria and eligibility information so that formal application proposals may be prepared. Consideration for funding will be given to applications that address the goals and

6 objectives of the JABG Plan in Appendix B. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.7. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.8. An estimated $500,000 will be available for award. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.9. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.10. The application must be completed and submitted electronically via the Grants Management Information System (GMIS) through the OHSJP website, www.scdps.org/ojp. Signatures are not necessary for electronic submissions. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.12. The deadline for submittal of applications is 5:00 p.m. on December 6, 2013. No applications will be accepted after this time. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.13. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.14. Please contact Bonnie Burns (803-896-8707 or [email protected]) regarding any programmatic questions. Contact Peggy McBride in Accounting- Grants for any financial questions at (803) 896-8414 or [email protected]. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.15. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.16. III. Eligible Applicants 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.17. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.18. JABG grant applications will be solicited from state agencies, cities, counties, towns, and due to a change in the 2004 federal regulations, private nonprofit and faith-based agencies are also eligible. School districts are not eligible to apply directly, but may serve as the implementing agency. In such cases, a representative of a state agency, city, 7 county, or town should sign as the Authorized Official, and a school representative should sign as the Project Director. Due to the reduced allocation, no jurisdictions will be eligible for a direct local entitlement for FY2013. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.19. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.20. IV. Eligible Program Areas

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.21. Applications will only be accepted within the following program areas described in Appendix A: Program Areas #1, Graduated Sanctions, specifically alternatives to secure detention, #3 Court Staffing and Pretrial Services, #12 Risk and Needs Assessment, #16 Detention/Corrections Personnel, and #17 Reentry. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.22. In the development of the plan, the Governor's Juvenile Justice Advisory Council (GJJAC) involved key law enforcement, judicial and juvenile justice personnel on the local, state and federal levels. Research was conducted to analyze the historical demands on the state's juvenile justice system, its current efforts, and projected resource needs. From this research, the eligible program areas authorized by the federal legislation were compared to the state's needs.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.23. V. Funding Period 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.24. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.25. Projects may be funded for a period of one year with possible continuation for a second or 8 third year based on an evaluation of the preceding year's grant performance. If you are applying for second or third year continuation, your application must include details about the progress and accomplishments of your program to date. Funding is contingent upon continuation of the JABG program at the federal level. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.26. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.27. VI. Distribution of JABG Funds (refer to Appendices for additional detail) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.28. FY2013 funds available for award will be approximately $500,000. The priority areas will support compliance with both Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders (DSO) and Jail Removal as well as a third mandate and state priority, Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC). As a part of South Carolina’s detention reform efforts, the Children’s Law Office (CLO) at the University of South Carolina School of Law has collected data on the use of secure detention by each county and provides technical assistance to counties and communities to help interpret this data and develop strategies to address the issue.

The Graduated Sanctions program area (specifically Alternatives to Detention) will support the implementation of the programs in categories such as (listed from least restrictive to most restrictive) home confinement, electronic monitoring, attendant care/holdover centers, day and evening reporting centers, case management/advocates, and residential alternatives. A list of sample detention alternative programs is located in Appendix D, and priority will be given to these programs and others that have been determined by national research to be best practices. Note that Disturbing Schools is now a common referral to SCDJJ, and programs to provide alternatives to detention may be tailored for this population. Detention alternatives applications should provide specific data about the numbers of youth securely detained and the types of offenses they are charged with, and tailor the program to this population.

Because the decision to detain rests with law enforcement in South Carolina, applications for detention alternatives must include a letter of support from all applicable local law enforcement agencies. A letter of support should also be provided by a Family Court judge, who should lead detention reform efforts at the local level. These agencies should be consulted throughout the developmental stages of the application, not just at the end. SCDJJ and Solicitor’s Offices are also important partners.

Note that the federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) has issued a determination that tours of adult jails and correctional facilities, which are components of many “Scared Straight” type programs, are violations of the Jail Removal mandate of the JJDP Act,

9 even if participation is a voluntary diversion from court involvement. Therefore, applicants are strongly discouraged from including such a component in any program, whether grant-funded or not.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.29. States are required to pass through, or award as subgrants, a minimum of 75 percent of its federal award each year to local areas. States may apply to the federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention for a waiver of this requirement. Because South Carolina’s juvenile justice system is centralized and the state bears over ninety percent of the costs for juvenile services, the state has traditionally applied for and been granted this waiver and plans to apply again for future federal fiscal years. This pass-through waiver does not mean that state agencies will be given any funding preference over local units of government. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.30. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.31. VII. Matching Requirement 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.32. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.33. A cash match of ten percent per line item and total program cost is required. As an example, if a line item’s/program’s cost were $50,000, the requested funding amount would be $45,000, with a $5,000 cash match. [For the construction of permanent juvenile secure correction facilities, a cash match of fifty percent of total program cost is required. For nonsecure correctional facilities, a match of ten percent is required] 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.34.

10 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.35. VIII. Notice of Post-Award Reporting Requirements 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.36. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.37. Applicants should anticipate that all recipients of awards of $25,000 or more under this solicitation, consistent with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA), will be required to report award information on any awards totaling $25,000 or more, and, in certain cases, to report information on the names and total compensation of the five most highly compensated executives of the recipients. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.38. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.39. IX. Guidelines for the Use of JABG Funds

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.40. A. Allowable Expenses 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.41. 1. Personnel, training as a component of an overall program, operating expenses, equipment and supplies are allowable expenses if they are related to the programs that address the authorized program areas. All expenditures must be related to the implementation of an actual program. This program must be defined in the program narrative sections of the application; 2. Grant-funded personnel must have one hundred percent of their time dedicated to grant activities unless they are paid by the hour and all required hourly documentation is maintained. If paid by the hour, the total percentage of time dedicated to the grant must be indicated in the grant budget pages and the grant charged accordingly (See also all non- supplanting provisions in the Grant Terms and Conditions.); and 3. Audit fees can be included in project budgets to cover the costs associated with an audit of the project. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.42. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.43. B. Unallowable Expenses 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.44. 1. Any expenditures that are not a part of an approved program or project (within the authorized program areas) are not allowable; 2. Funds may not be used to supplant existing state or local criminal or juvenile justice funds. Any expenditures must increase the existing amount of funds available for eligible activities; 11 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.45. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.46. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.47. X. Application Review and Evaluation Process 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.48. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.49. The following factors will be considered in the evaluation of applications: 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.50. A. Budget – Proposed expenditures are reasonable, adhere to the guidelines, equipment and personnel are documented as necessary and each expenditure is explained in detail in the budget narrative. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.51. B. Problem Statement – The problem is clearly defined and must be supported by available current objective statistical information, facts or a needs assessment. Existing efforts, current resources and programs being utilized to deal with the problem must be thoroughly addressed. The data should include the most current available and should be specific to the area to be served by the project. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.52. C. Needs Assessment – Clearly outlines how needs were determined and includes how cooperation needs were gathered from other agencies or jurisdictions. It includes information concerning any grant funds the applying agency currently receives or has received in the past two years concerning juveniles and families. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.53. D. Project Description – Tells the reader exactly what the program plans to do by explaining the grant activities that will be used to accomplish the objectives. It is clear to the reader that the project has been well thought out, excellent planning is evident, and chances of success are documented as good. It documents what counties will be served with this project. Includes evaluation component.

E. Progress Report – For those applying for continuation projects only. Provides detailed progress on accomplishments made during each prior year of the grant program. New applicants will type “N/A” in this section. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.54. F. Objectives – Are relevant, specific and measurable. They specify what the program will accomplish in concrete terms. Each objective corresponds to each performance indicator. Objectives outline who will do what by when and with what desirable result. Good ways to measure results include percentage increases or decreases, numerical increases or decreases and surveys administered at the beginning and end of the project that measure participants’ changes in attitudes and/or increases in knowledge. Academic improvement may be measured by letter grades, standardized test scores and promotions to the next grade level. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.55. G. Performance Indicators – The indicators match objectives exactly and state how each objective will be measured to assess the effectiveness of the project. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.56. H. Project Continuation Potential – A clear plan for pursuing project independence is evident and the probability of success is good.

12 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.57. I. Target Population or Service Delivery Area – The target population is described in terms of demographics and geographical area to be served; Target Population or Service Delivery Area – The target population is described in terms of demographics and geographical area to be served; Definition of geographic boundaries of the project’s neighborhood or community. Such information should contain the following information on the geographic area(s) that the subgrant recipient will serve using the format specified below:

Physical address: If the mailing address is a PO box, specify the physical address(es) of the location(s) where the subgrantee will provide services. If the mailing address is in a rural area with no street address, include the nearest street intersection. If the subgrant program has multiple service areas, include the required information for each.

(Example with street address) ABC Associates 123 First Street Shrewsbury, SC 29361

(Example with no street address) ABC Associates First Street and Holiday Drive Shrewsbury, SC 29361

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.58. J. Project Abstract – The abstract will be used in recommendations to officials who will not see the entire application. It should be clear, concise and tell the story in a short paragraph. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.59. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.60. K. Other Relevant Factors and Requirements – The application must contain all relevant documentation. Grant-funded personnel training requirements must be stated, project area population must be addressed, etc.; and the application must be complete.

The Juvenile Justice grant program uses a multi-step application review and evaluation process. It begins with consideration by Juvenile Justice Program staff and the Grants Committee from the Governor's Juvenile Justice Advisory Council (GJJAC). They determine which applications are best qualified, fully qualified or unqualified.

The recommendation list is subjected to further programmatic and financial staff review to determine compliance with federal and state programmatic and financial guidelines. After review by the full GJJAC, the application summaries and recommendations are reviewed at the Department level before going to the South Carolina Public Safety Coordinating Council for approval.

XI. Evaluation Plan

A. Identify by position who will be responsible for collecting data and preparing quarterly progress reports. This may be done on page 11 (performance indicators) of the application or as a separate explanation in the project description section.

13 B. Explain what quantitative and qualitative information will be collected and how this information will be maintained (e.g., manual or electronic log). Quantitative information is a numerical measurement such as number of referrals; number diverted from court, number placed in alternative treatment, number of adjudications or number of sentences. Qualitative information is information that is harder or impossible to define numerically. It includes such things as survey comments, improvement in a neighborhood’s environment or improved communication between residents, police officers and juvenile justice officials. Qualitative information can be documented through photos, interviews, observation, media reports or community reaction to expansion of a project. An explanation must be provided that details how information will be collected and what measures exist to ensure that a reliable system has been developed to collect needed project information.

C. Discuss how this information will be analyzed to determine success (e.g., comparison to prior year or baseline year, compilation of survey results, etc.). Each objective must be constructed to show success through data analysis and by compiling qualitative information. If an objective cannot be measured or proven successful through collection and analysis of quantitative or qualitative information, it must be deleted or rewritten so it can be measured. Similar periods of time must be compared to show improvements (in other words, calendar year 2013 should be compared to calendar year 2014, or fiscal year 2013 to fiscal year 2014). Prior year or baseline data should be compiled and included as part of the problem statement. Obviously, it is impossible to document improvement or increases or decreases in crime rates or trends as a result of the project if prior year or baseline data was never collected. Applicants are strongly encouraged to include some objectives and performance indicators that can be measured at intervals throughout the grant period, not just at its conclusion. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.61. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.62. XII. Grant Application and Review Schedule 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.63. December 6, 2013 Deadline for completed FFY13 applications to SCDPS, 5:00 p.m.

January 2014 Grants Committee review

February 2014 Governor’s Juvenile Justice Advisory Council review

March 2014 Public Safety Coordinating Council review

March 2014 Grant award notices mailed

April 1, 2014 FY13 JABG grant period begins

XIII. Grant Application/Proposal Review Check List

In order to avoid common mistakes, applicants should answer the following questions when reviewing their completed application:

 Do the budget figures on pages 1-3 add up correctly?  Are all sections of the application completed? 14  Are the objectives quantifiable?  Is there a corresponding performance indicator for each objective?  Do the data in the Needs Assessment/Problem Statement include the most current available? Are they specific to the target area?  Is the project within the bounds of one of the 17 Program Areas?  If you are applying for a continuation, have you included detailed information about program progress and accomplishments to date?

15 XIV. APPENDICES

16 APPENDIX A

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.64. JAB G Priority Program Areas 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.65.

1. Graduated Sanctions: developing, implementing, and administering graduated sanctions for juvenile offenders 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.66. 3. Court Staffing and Pretrial Services: hiring juvenile court judges, probation officers, and court- appointed defenders and special advocates, and funding pretrial services (including mental health screening and assessment) for juvenile offenders, to promote the effective and expeditious administration of the juvenile justice system 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.67. 12. Risk and Needs Assessment: establishing and maintaining programs to conduct risk and needs assessments of juvenile offenders that facilitate effective early intervention and the provision of comprehensive services, including mental health screening and treatment and substance abuse testing and treatment, to such offenders 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.68. 16. Detention/Corrections Personnel: hiring detention and corrections personnel and establishing and maintaining training programs for such personnel, to improve facility practices and programming including activities to address the requirements of the Prison Rape Elimination ACT (PREA). 17. Reentry: establishing and maintaining reentry programs

17 APPENDIX B

FY2013 Federal Performance Measure Areas

18 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.69. OJJDP CORE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.70. All award recipients are required to provide data for each applicable OJJDP Core Measure shown below. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.76. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.77. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.78.A. Number of program/initiatives employing 1.1.1. Number and percent of programs/initiativesReportevidence the number based and programs percent orof practices 1.1.1. 1.79. B. Total number of programs/initiatives C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.80. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.81. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.82.A. The number of youth served using an 1.1.1. Number and percent of youthThe with numberevidence-based whom and an percent program of youth or practiceserved 1.1.1. 1.84. B. Total number of youth served during the reporting period C. Percent (A/B) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.83.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.85. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.86. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.87.A. Number of program youth/families 1.1.1. 3 Number of program youth and/orAn unduplicated carriedfamilies over count from ofthe the previous number reporting of 1.1.1. period 1.90. B. New admissions during the reporting 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.88.period ProgramC. Total records youth/families are the preferred served during data the reporting period (A+B) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.89.

19 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.91. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.92. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.93.A. Number of program youth who exited the 1.1.1. Number and percent of programThe number youthprogram and having percent completed of program program youth 1.1.1. requirements 1.96. B. Total number of youth who exited the program during the reporting period (either successfully or unsuccessfully) C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.94. The total number of youth (the “B” value)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.95. Program records are the preferred data

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.97. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.98. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.101.A. Total number of program youth served 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.107. Number and percent of programTheB. number youthNumber whoand of program percent ofyouth participating tracked during the reporting period 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.99. C. Of B, the number of program youth who (short term) had an arrest or delinquent offense 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.100. during the reporting period Updated 04/01/2012 D. Number of program youth who were 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.102.committed to a juvenile facility during The numberthe reporting of youth period tracked should reflect E. Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during the reporting period F. Number of youth who received another sentence during the reporting period 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.103.G. Percent OFFENDING (C/B) A youth may be ‘committed’ to a juvenile

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.104. Certain jurisdictions refer to adjudications as

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.105. Other sentences may be community based

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.106. Example: If I am tracking 50 program youth

20 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.108. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.109. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.112.A. Total number of program youth who 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.118. Number and percent of programThe number youthexited whotheand program percent of6-12 participating months ago that you are tracking 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.110. B. Of A, the number of program youth who (long term) had an arrest or delinquent offense 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.111. during the reporting period Updated 04/01/2012 C. Number of program youth who were committed to a juvenile facility during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.113.the reporting period The number of youth tracked should reflect D. Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during the reporting period E. Number of youth who received another 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.114.sentence during the reporting period A youthF. Percent may beOFFENDING ‘committed’ (B/A) to a juvenile

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.115. Certain jurisdictions refer to adjudications as

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.117. Example: A grantee may have several youth

21 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.119. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.120. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.123.A. Total number of program youth served 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.128. Number and percent of programTheB. number youthNumber whoand of program percentRE- ofyouth participating tracked during the reporting period 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.121. C. Of B, number of program youth who had (short term) a new arrest or new delinquent offense 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.122. during the reporting period Updated 04/01/2012 D. Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.124.the reporting period TheE. numberNumber of of youth program tracked youth should who reflectwere sentenced to adult prison during the reporting period F. Number of youth who received another sentence during the reporting period G. Percent RECIDIVISM (C/B) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.125. Certain jurisdictions refer to adjudications as

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.127. Example: If I am tracking 50 program youth

22 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.129. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.130. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.133.A. Number of program youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.138. Number and percent of programThe number youthprogram whoand 6-12 percentRE- months of participatingago that you are tracking 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.131. B. Of A, the number of program youth who (long term) had a new arrest or new delinquent 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.132. offense during the reporting period Updated 04/01/2012 C. Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.134.the reporting period TheD. numberNumber of of youth program tracked youth should who reflectwere sentenced to adult prison during the reporting period E. Number of youth who received another sentence during the reporting period 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.135.F. Percent RECIDIVISM (B/A) Certain jurisdictions refer to adjudications as

23 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.139. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.140. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.143.A. Total number of program youth served 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.146. Number and percent of programTheB. measure youthNumber who determinesof program are theyouth number tracked of during the reporting period for victimization 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.141. C. Of B, the number of program youth who (short term) were victimized 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.142. D. Percent VICTIMIZED (C/B) Updated 04/01/2012 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.144. The number of youth tracked should reflect

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.145. Example:

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.147. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.148. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.150.A. Number of program youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.153. Number and percent of programThe measure youthprogram who determines 6-12 are months the ago number that you of are tracking for victimization B. Of A, the number of program youth who 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.149. were victimized during the reporting Updated 04/01/2012 period C. Percent VICTIMIZED (B/A) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.151. The number of youth tracked should reflect

24 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.154. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.155. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.158.A. Total number of program youth served 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.161. Number and percent of programTheB. re-victimization youthNumber who of program are measure youth counts tracked the during the reporting period for re-victimization 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.156. C. Of B, the number of program youth who (short term) were re-victimized 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.157. D. Percent RE-VICTIMIZED (C/B) Updated 04/01/2012 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.159. The number of youth tracked should reflect

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.160. Example:

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.162. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.163. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.166.A. Number of program youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.169. Number and percent of programThe re-victimization youthprogram who 6-12 are monthsmeasure ago counts that theyou are tracking for re-victimization 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.164. B. Of A, the number of program youth who (long term) were re-victimized during the reporting 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.165. period Updated 04/01/2012 C. Percent RE-VICTIMIZED (B/A) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.167. The number of youth tracked should reflect

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.168. Example: If I am tracking 50 program youth,

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.170. Select one of the following from 13A through 13L depending on the primary focus of the program.

25 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.171. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.172. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.174.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.176. Substance use The numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.173. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services for target behavior during the reporting 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.175.period Self-report,C. Percent staff (A/B) rating, or urinalysis are most

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.177. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.178. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.180.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.182. Substance use The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.179. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.181.exited the program 6-12 months ago Self-report,C. Percent staff (A/B) rating, or urinalysis are most

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.183. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.184. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.186.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.188. Social competence The numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.185. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services for the target behavior during the reporting period C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.187. Self-report or staff ratings are the most likely

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.189. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.190. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.192.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.194. Social competence The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.191. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who exited the program 6-12 months ago C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.195. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.196. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.198.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.200. School attendance The numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.197. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services for the target behavior during the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.199.reporting period Self-reportC. Percent or official(A/B) records are the most

26 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.201. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.202. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.204.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.206. School attendance The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.203. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.205.exited the program 6-12 months ago Self-reportC. Percent or official(A/B) records are the most

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.207. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.208. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.210.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.212. GPA The numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.209. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.211.for target behavior during the reporting Self-reportperiod or official records are the most C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.213. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.214. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.216.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.218. GPA The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.215. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.217.services for the target behavior and who Self-reportexited or the official program records 6-12 are months the most ago C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.219. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.220. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.222.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.224. GED The numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.221. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.223.for target behavior during the reporting Self-reportperiod or staff ratings are the most likely C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.225. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.226. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.228.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.230. GED The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.227. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.229.services for the target behavior and who Self-reportexited or the staff program ratings 6-12 are themonths most ago likely C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.231. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.232. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.233.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.235. High School Completion The numberthe reporting of youth period who havewith thecompleted noted behavioral change 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.234.B. Total number of youth receiving services Programfor targetrecords behavior are the preferredduring the data reporting period C. Percent (A/B)

27 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.236. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.237. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.238.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.240. High School Completion The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the noted behavioral change B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.239.exited the program 6-12 months ago ProgramC. Percent records (A/B) are the preferred data

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.241. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.242. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.244.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.246. Job Skills The numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.243. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.245.for target behavior during the reporting Self-reportperiod or staff rating is most likely data C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.247. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.248. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.250.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.252. Job Skills The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.249. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.251.services for the target behavior and who Self-reportexited or the staff program rating is6-12 most months likely agodata C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.253. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.254. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.256.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.258. Employment status The numberthe reporting of program period youth with whothe notedhave 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.255. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services for target behavior during the reporting 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.257.period Self-reportC. Percent or staff(A/B) ratings are most likely

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.259. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.260. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.262.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.264. Employment status The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.261. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.263.exited the program 6-12 months ago Self-reportC. Percent or staff(A/B) ratings are most likely

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.265. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.266. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.267.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.269. Family relationships The numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth behavioral change B. Total number of youth receiving services for target behavior during the reporting period C. Percent (A/B)

28 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.270. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.271. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.273.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.275. Family relationships The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.272. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who exited the program 6-12 months ago C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.276. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.277. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.279.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.281. Antisocial behavior The numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.278. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services for the target behavior during the reporting period C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.282. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.283. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.285.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.287. Antisocial behavior The numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.284. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who exited the program 6-12 months ago C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.288. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.289. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.291.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.293. Gang resistance/ involvementThe numberthe reporting and percent period of with program the noted youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.290. behavioral change (short term) B. Total number of youth receiving services for the target behavior during the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.292.reporting period Self-reportC. Percent or staff(A/B) ratings are the most likely

29 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.294. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.295. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.297.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.299. Gang resistance/ involvementThe numberprogram and 6-12 percent months of programago who youthhad the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.296. noted behavioral change (long term) B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.298.exited the program 6-12 months ago Self-reportC. Percent or staff(A/B) ratings are the most likely

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.300. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.301. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.302.A. Number of program youth served during 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.303. Cultural Skill building/CulturalThe Pride numberthe reporting of program period youth with whothe notedexhibit behavioral change B. Total number of youth receiving services for the target behavior during the reporting period C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.304. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.305. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.306.A. Total number of youth who exited the 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.307. Cultural Skill building/CulturalThe Pride numberprogram of 6-12program months youth ago who who exhibit had the noted behavioral change B. Total number of youth who received services for the target behavior and who exited the program 6-12 months ago C. Percent (A/B)

Program Area 1: Graduated Sanctions 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.308. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.309. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.310. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.311. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.312.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.313.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.314. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.315. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.318.A. Funds awarded to program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.319. Amount of JABG/Tribal JADG funds awardedThe amountfor services of JABG/Tribal JADG

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.316. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.317. (Mandatory for System Improvement only)

30 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.309. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.310. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.311. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.312.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.313.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.320. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.321. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.322.A. Number of graduated 1.1.1.1. Number of graduated sanctions policies institutedDeterminesanctions level policies of program 1.1.1.32 3.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.324. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.325. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.327.A. Number of units 1.1.1.1. 16 Number of juvenile justice units that are Determineimplementing coverage graduated of the 1.1.1.32 sanctions programs 8. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.326.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.329. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.330. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.331.A. Number of different 1.1.1.1. Number and percent of programs using graduatedDeterminegraduated coverage sanctions of graduated 1.1.1.33 programs implemented 2. B. Total number of programs run by the grantee C. Percent (A/B)

31 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.309. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.310. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.311. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.312.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.313.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.333. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.334. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.335.A. Number of supervision 1.1.1.1. Number of supervision meetings per youthDetermine in meetings whether held graduated 1.1.1.33 6. B. Number of youth served C. Number of meetings per youth in graduated sanctions

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.337. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.338. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.339.A. Number of youth with a 1.1.1.1. Number and percent of youth who had a behavioralDeterminebehavioral whether contract graduated 1.1.1.34 developed when they 0. entered the program B. Number of youth to enter the program C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.341. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.342. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.343.A. Number of different 1.1.1.1. Number of sanctioning options available atDetermine eachimmediate coverage sanctioning of the 1.1.1.34 options 4. B. Number of different intermediate sanctioning options C. Number of different secure care sanctioning options D. Number of different aftercare/reentry sanctioning options

32 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.309. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.310. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.311. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.312.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.313.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.345. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.346. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.347.A. Number of staff trained 1.1.1.1. Number and percent of staff trained on theTo use determine of coverage of the 1.1.1.34 B. Number of staff who offer 8. direct services C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.349. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.350. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.351.A. Number of training requests 1.1.1.1. Number of training requests RECEIVED This measurereceived represents during the the 1.1.1.35 reporting period. 2.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.353. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.354. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.355.A. Number of technical 1.1.1.1. Number of technical assistance requests RECEIVEDThis measureassistance represents requests the 1.1.1.35 received during the 6. reporting period

33 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.309. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.310. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.311. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.312.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.313.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.357. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.358. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.359.A. Number of program 1.1.1.1. Number of program materials developed duringThis measurematerials the represents developed the 1.1.1.36 0.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.361. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.362. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.363.A. Number of planning or 1.1.1.1. Number of planning or training events heldThis during measuretraining activitiesrepresents held the 1.1.1.36 during the reporting period 4.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.365. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.366. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.367.A. Number of people trained 1.1.1.1. Number of people trained during the reportingThis measure represents the 1.1.1.36 8.

34 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.309. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.310. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.311. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.312.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.313.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.369. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.370. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.371.A. Number of programs served 1.1.1.1. Percent of those served by training and technicalNumberby andTTA percentthat reported of programs using 1.1.1.37 an evidence-based program 2. and / or practice. B. Number of programs served by TTA C. Percent of programs served by TTA that report using an evidence-based program and / or practice (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.373. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.374. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.375. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.376. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.377. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.378. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.379. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.380. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.381. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.382. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.383. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.384.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.385.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.386. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.387. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.388.A. Number of people exhibiting an 1.1.1. Percent of people exhibiting an increasedThis knowledge measureincrease ofrepresents in knowledge the post-training. number 1.1.1. 1.389. B. Number of people trained during the reporting period. C. Percent of people trained who exhibited increased knowledge (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.390. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.391. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.392.A. Number of programs policies 1.1.1. Number of program policies changed, improved,This measurechanged or represents during the thereporting number period 1.1.1. 1.393. B. Number of programs policies rescinded during the reporting period

35 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.381. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.382. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.383. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.384.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.385.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.394. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.395. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.396.A. The number of organizations 1.1.1. 30 Percent of organizations reporting improvementsThe numberreporting in and improvements percent of in 1.1.1. operations based on training and 1.397. technical assistance during the reporting period. B. Number of organizations served by TTA during the reporting period. C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.398. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.399. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.400.A. Number of sanctions overturned 1.1.1. Number and percent of sanctions that wereGain successfully insight into the appropriateness 1.1.1. B. Number of sanctions applied 1.401. C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.402. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.403. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.404.A. Number of hours of service to youth 1.1.1. Number of hours of service received perMeasure youth the amount of service youth 1.1.1. B. Number of youth 1.405. C. Number of hours per youth (A/B)

36 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.381. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.382. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.383. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.384.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.385.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.406. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.407. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.408.A. Total cost per case not using 1.1.1. Cost savings Determinegraduated the efficiency sanctions of the 1.1.1. 1.409. B. Total cost per graduated sanctions case C. Cost savings (A-B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.410. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.411. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.412.A. Number of youth who without the 1.1.1. Number and percent of cases that resultDetermine in alternativesprogram if the would program have is been working assigned 1.1.1. to detention 1.413. B. Number of youth assigned to detention C. Percent (A/(A + B))

37 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.381. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.382. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.383. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.384.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.385.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.414. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.415. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.416.A. Number of cases to result in 1.1.1. Number and percent of cases that resultDetermine in communitycommunity whether service the graduated 1.1.1. 1.417. B. Number of cases to result in monetary restitution C. Number of cases to result in direct service to victims D. Number of cases handled by the grantee E. Percent of cases resulted in community service (A/D) F. Percent of cases resulted in monetary restitution (B/D) G. Percent of cases resulted in direct service to victims (C/D)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.418. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.419. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.420.A. Number of sanction-level changes 1.1.1. Number and percent of sanction changesDetermine thatto were more if sanctions restrictive are being 1.1.1. 1.421. B. Number of sanction-level changes C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.422. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.423. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.424.A. Cumulative hours from infractions 1.1.1. Time in hours from infraction to sanctionDetermineto sanctions if the program is 1.1.1. 1.425. B. Number of infractions C. Average (A/B)

38 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.381. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.382. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.383. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.384.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.385.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.426. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.427. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.428.A. Number of youth for whom staff 1.1.1. Number and percent of youth who were Determinemonitoredfollowed if the the program guidelines is of the 1.1.1. youth's behavioral contract 1.429. B. Number of youth served C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.430. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.431. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.432.A. Number of non-compliant events 1.1.1. Number of non-compliant events (e.g., missingDetermine if youth are acting more 1.1.1. B. Number of youth requirements 1.433. C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.434. Program Area 3: Hiring Court Staff/Pretrial Services 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.435. 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. 440. 1. Record Data 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1. Here 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.438. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.439. 437. Outpu Definition Data Grantee Reports 1. t Measure 1. 43 6. #

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.442. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.445.A. Funds awarded to program for 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Amount of JABG/Tribal JADG funds awardedThe amountforservices of JABG/Tribal JADG 1.446. 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.443. 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.444. 1. (Mandatory for system improvement only) 1. 1. 44 1. 7 4

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.448. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.449.A. Number of judges hired 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1.450. 1. Number and percent of each of the followingDetermine typesB. Total of staff thenumber distribution of judges of the 1. C. Percent (A/B) 1. D. Number of probation officers hired 1. E. Total number of probation officers: 1. F. Percent (D/E) 1. G. Number of defenders hired 44 H. Total number of defenders 7. 7 I. Percent (G/H) 5 J. Number of special advocates hired K. Total number of special advocates L. Percent (J/K) M.Number of pretrial service staff hired N. Total number of pretrial staff O. Percent (M/N)

40 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. 440. 1. Record Data 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1. Here 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.438. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.439. 437. Outpu Definition Data Grantee Reports 1. t Measure 1. 43 6. #

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.452. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.453.A. Number of cases 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1.454. 1. Number of cases per staff member MeasureB. Number of infrastructure. of court staff 1. C. Number of cases per staff (A/B) 1. 1. 1. 1. 45 1. 7 6

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.456. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.457.A. Number of vacant positions 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1.458. 1. Number and percent of vacant positions for eachDetermineB. ofTotal the programnumber of operational positions 1. C. Percent (A/B) 1. 1. 1. 1. 45 5. 7 7

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.460. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.461.A. Number of different types of 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number of different pretrial service types Determinepretrial program services scope. 1.462. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 45 9. 7 8

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.464. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.465.A. Number of pretrial service slots 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number of pretrial service slots Determine program scope. 1.466. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 46 3. 7 9

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.468. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.469.A. Number of hours of training 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number of hours of training about pretrial servicesMeasureoffered offered of infrastructure. 1.470. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 46 7. 8 0

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.472. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.473.A. Number of staff trained in pretrial 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number and percent of staff trained in pretrialMeasure servicesservices of infrastructure. 1.474. 1. B. Number of staff 1. C. Percent (A/B) 1. 1. 1. 47 1. 8 1

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.476. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.477.A. Number of training requests 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number of training requests RECEIVED This measurereceived represents during the thereporting 1.478. 1. period. 1. 1. 1. 1. 47 5. 8 2

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.480. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.481.A. Number of technical assistance 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number of technical assistance requests RECEIVEDThis measurerequests represents received during the the 1.482. 1. reporting period 1. 1. 1. 1. 47 9. 8 3

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.484. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.485.A. Number of program materials 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number of program materials developed duringThis the measuredeveloped represents the 1.487. 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.486. 1. 1. 1. 1. 48 3. 8 4

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.489. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.490.A. Number of planning or training 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number of planning or training events held duringThis measureactivities the represents held during the the reporting 1.491. 1. period 1. 1. 1. 1. 48 8. 8 5

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.493. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.494.A. Number of people trained 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Number of people trained during the reportingThis period measure represents the 1.495. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 49 2. 8 6

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.497. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.498.A. Number of programs served by 1.1.1.1.1.1. 1. Percent of those served by training and technicalNumber TTA and that percent reported of using an 1.499. evidence-based program and / or 1. practice. 1. B. Number of programs served by 1. TTA. 1. C. Percent of programs served by 1. TTA that report using an evidence- 49 based program and / or practice (A/B) 6. 8 7

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.500.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.501. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.502.A. Number of people exhibiting an 1.1.1. Percent of people exhibiting an increased knowledgeThis measureincrease of represents in knowledge the post- 1.1.1. training. 1.503. B. Number of people trained during the reporting period. C. Percent of people trained who exhibited increased knowledge (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.504.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.505. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.506.A. Number of programs policies 1.1.1. Number of program policies changed, improved,This ormeasurechanged represents during the the reporting 1.1.1. period 1.507. B. Number of programs policies rescinded during the reporting period

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.508.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.509. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.510.A. The number of organizations 1.1.1. 90 Percent of organizations reporting improvementsThe number inreporting and improvements percent of in 1.1.1. operations based on training and 1.511. technical assistance during the reporting period. B. Number of organizations served by TTA during the reporting period. C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.512.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.513. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.514.A. Number of individual services 1.1.1. Number of pretrial services received per youthMeasuredelivered of program 1.1.1. 1.515. B. Number of youth served C. Number of services per youth (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.516.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.517. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.518.A. Average number of hours judges 1.1.1. Number of hours per week and percent of staffMeasure timespend spent of program in direct service per week 1.1.1. 1.519. B. Average number of hours judges work per week C. Percent (A/B) D. Average number of hours probation officers spend in direct service per week E. Average number of hours probation officers work per week F. Percent (D/E) G. Average number of hours defenders spend in direct service per week H. Average number of hours defenders work per week: I. Percent (G/H) J. Average number of hours special advocates spend in direct service per week K. Average number of hours special advocates work per week L. Percent (J/K) M.Average number of hours pretrial service staff spend in direct service per week N. Average number of hours pretrial service staff work per week O. Percent (M/N)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.520.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.521. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.522.A. Number of youth screened 1.1.1. Number and percent of youth screened Measure of program 1.1.1. B. Number of youth in program 1.524. C. Percent (A/B) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.523.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.525.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.526. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.527.A. Number of youth assessed 1.1.1. Number and percent of youth assessed Measure of program 1.1.1. B. Number of youth in program 1.528. C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.529.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.530. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.531.A. Average number of hours from 1.1.1. Average time in hours from first contact to screeningMeasuredetermination of program efficiency.of screening need 1.1.1. to end of screening 1.532.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.533.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.534. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.535.A. Average number of hours from 1.1.1. Average time in hours from screening to assessmentMeasureend of of program screening efficiency. to end of 1.1.1. assessment 1.537. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.536.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.538.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.539. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.540.A. Number of youth receiving pretrial 1.1.1. Number of youth to receive pretrial servicesMeasureservice of program 1.1.1. 1.541. B. Number of youth that meet pretrial criteria C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.542.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.543. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.544.A. Average number of days from 1.1.1. Average time in days from case assignment Measureto firstassignment of program to efficiency.first meeting with 1.1.1. staff 1.546. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.545.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.547.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.548. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.549.A. Number of complete files 1.1.1. Number and percent of complete case files Measure of infrastructure. 1.1.1. B. Number of open cases 1.551. C. Percent (A/B) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.550.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.552.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.553. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.554.A. Average number of days from 1.1.1. Average time in days from referral to pretrialMeasure servicesreferral of to program to the completionefficiency. of 1.1.1. pretrial processing 1.555.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.556.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.557. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.558.A. Number of pretrial appointments 1.1.1. Number and percent pretrial appointments missedMeasuremissed by of youth accountability. 1.1.1. 1.559. B. Number of pretrial appointments scheduled C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.560.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.561. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.562.A. Number of clients that flow 1.1.1. Number and percent of youth to go through Measurethe systemthrough of systemas program operations as intended 1.1.1. 1.564. B. Number of clients C. Percent (A/B) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.563.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.565.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.566. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.567.A. Number of youth to receive 1.1.1. Number and percent of youth to receive mentalMeasure healthmental of program health servicesscope. 1.1.1. 1.568. B. Number of youth served C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.569. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.570. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.571. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.572. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.573. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.574. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.575. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.576. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.577. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.578. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.579. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.580. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.581. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.582. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.583. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.584. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.585. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.586. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.587. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.588. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.589. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.590. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.591. Program Area 12: Risk/Needs Assessments 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.592.

52 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.593. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.594. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.595. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.596.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.597.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.598. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.599. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.600.A. Number of units that use a 1.1.1.1.1 Number and percent of intake units using validMeasure andvalidated of program risk assessment .1.1.601. tool B. Number of units C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.602. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.603. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.604.A. Number of units that use a 1.1.1.1.1 Number and percent of intake units using validMeasure andvalidated of program needs assessment .1.1.605. tool B. Number of units C. Percent (A/B)

53 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.593. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.594. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.595. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.596.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.597.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.606. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.607. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.608.A. Average number of data 1.1.1.1.1 320 Average number of sources used in assessmentMeasure sources of system used per youth .1.1.609. assessment

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.610. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.611. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.612.A. Number of assessors with 1.1.1.1.1 Number and percent of assessment staff withMeasure specialized of system training .1.1.613. B. Number of assessors C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.614. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.615. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.616.A. Number of training requests 1.1.1.1.1 Number of training requests RECEIVED This measurereceived represents during the the .1.1.617. reporting period.

54 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.593. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.594. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.595. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.596.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.597.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.618. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.619. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.620.A. Number of technical 1.1.1.1.1 Number of technical assistance requests RECEIVEDThis measureassistance represents requests the received .1.1.621. during the reporting period

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.622. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.623. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.624.A. Number of program 1.1.1.1.1 Number of program materials developed duringThis the measurematerials represents developed the .1.1.625.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.626. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.627. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.628.A. Number of planning or 1.1.1.1.1 Number of planning or training events held duringThis measure trainingthe activitiesrepresents held the .1.1.629. during the reporting period

55 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.593. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.594. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.595. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.596.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.597.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.630. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.631. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.632.A. Number of people trained 1.1.1.1.1 Number of people trained during the reportingThis period measure represents the .1.1.633.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.634. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.635. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.636.A. Number of programs served 1.1.1.1.1 Percent of those served by training and technicalNumber by andTTA percentthat reported of using .1.1.637. an evidence-based program and / or practice. B. Number of programs served by TTA C. Percent of programs served by TTA that report using an evidence-based program and / or practice (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.638. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.639. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.640. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.641. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.642. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.643. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.644.

56 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.645. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.646. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.647. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.648.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.649.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.650. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.651. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.652.A. Number of programs policies 1.1.1. 328 Number of program policies changed, improved,This measurechanged or represents during the thereporting 1.1.1. period 1.653 . B. Number of programs policies rescinded during the reporting period

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.654. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.655. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.656.A. Number of people exhibiting an 1.1.1. Percent of people exhibiting an increasedThis knowledge measureincrease represents in knowledge the post- 1.1.1. training. 1.657 . B. Number of people trained during the reporting period. C. Percent of people trained who exhibited increased knowledge (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.658. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.659. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.660.A. The number of organizations 1.1.1. 330 Percent of organizations reporting improvementsThe numberreporting in and improvements percent of in 1.1.1. operations as a result of TTA one 1.661 to six months post-service . B. The total number of organizations served by TTA during the reporting period C. Percent of organizations reporting improvements (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.662. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.663. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.664.A. Number of youth with complete 1.1.1. 331 Number and percent of youth fully assessedMeasure usingfiles of system accountability. 1.1.1. 1.665 B. Number of youth . C. Percent (A/B)

57 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.645. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.646. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.647. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.648.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.649.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.666. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.667. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.668.A. Number of youth assessed as 1.1.1. 332 Of the total number of youth identified asMeasure needingneeding of system substance accountability abuse 1.1.1. treatment 1.669 . B. Number of youth identified as needing substance abuse treatment C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.670. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.671. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.672.A. Number of youth assessed as 1.1.1. 333 Of the total number of youth identified asMeasure needingneeding of system mental accountability health treatment 1.1.1. 1.673 B. Number of youth identified as . needing mental health treatment C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.674. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.675. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.676.A. Average number of hours from 1.1.1. 334 Average time in hours from screening to Measureassessmentscreening of program completion efficiency. to 1.1.1. assessment completion 1.677 .

58 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.645. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.646. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.647. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.648.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.649.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.678. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.679. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.680.A. Average number of days from 1.1.1. 335 Average time in days from assessment toMeasure first assessmentservice of program completion efficiency. to first 1.1.1. service 1.681 .

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.682. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.683. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.684.A. Number of referrals for a primary 1.1.1. 336 Number and percent of referrals to primaryMeasure prevention of program service operation. 1.1.1. 1.685 B. Number of referrals total . C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.686. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.687. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.688.A. Number of referrals for a 1.1.1. 337 Number and percent of referrals to secondaryMeasure secondary of program prevention operation. service 1.1.1. 1.689 Number of referrals B. . C. Percent (A/B)

59 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.645. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.646. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.647. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.648.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.649.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.690. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.691. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.692.A. Average number of referrals per 1.1.1. 338 Number of different service referrals per Measureyouthyouth of program operation. 1.1.1. 1.693 .

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.694. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.695. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.696.A. Average number of hours from 1.1.1. 339 Average time in hours from first justice contactMeasurefirst for of justice program contact efficiency. to screening 1.1.1. completion 1.697 .

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.698. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.699. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.700.A. Number of times youth receive 1.1.1. 340 Number and percent of times services identifiedMeasurereferred of system service accountability 1.1.1. 1.701 Number of services youth were B. . assessed as needing C. Percent (A/B)

60 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.645. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.646. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.647. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.648.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.649.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.702. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.703. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.704.A. Number of cases assigned to an 1.1.1. 341 Number and percent of cases assigned toTo determinealternative if the to detentionprogram is 1.1.1. 1.705 Number of cases assigned to B. . detention C. Percent (A/(B +B))

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.706. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.707. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.708.A. Number of youth that do not 1.1.1. 342 Number and percent of youth who cannotMeasure receivereceive of system services accountability. they are 1.1.1. assessed as needing 1.709 . B. Number of youth assessed as needing services C. Percent (A/B)

61 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.710. Program Area 16: Hiring Detention/Corrections Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.711. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.712.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.713. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.714. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.715.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.716.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.717.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.718. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.721.A. Funds awarded to program for 1.1.1. Amount of JABG/Tribal JADG funds awardedThe for amount services of JABG/Tribal 1.1.1. 1.722. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.719. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.720. (Mandatory for System Improvement only)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.723.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.724. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.725.A. Number of staff hired 1.1.1. Number and percent of staff hired Measure of infrastructure 1.1.1. B. Number of staff positions 1.726. C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.727.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.728. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.729.A. Number of vacant positions 1.1.1. 429 Number and percent of vacant positions Measure of program capacity. 1.1.1. B. Number of positions 1.730. C. Percent (A/B)

62 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.712.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.713. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.714. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.715.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.716.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.731.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.732. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.733.A. Number of youth 1.1.1. Ration of youth to staff Measure of infrastructure. 1.1.1. B. Number of staff 1.734. C. Ratio (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.735.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.736. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.737.A. Number of programs with 1.1.1. Number and percent of programs with vacant staffMeasure vacant of program staff positions 1.1.1. 1.738. B. Number of programs C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.739.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.740. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.741.A. Number of staff trained 1.1.1. Number and percent of staff trained in improvingMeasure facility of infrastructure. 1.1.1. B. Number of staff 1.742. C. Percent (A/B)

63 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.712.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.713. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.714. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.715.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.716.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.743.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.744. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.745.A. Number of hours of training 1.1.1. Number of hours of training offered in improvingMeasure facilityoffered of infrastructure. 1.1.1. 1.746.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.747.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.748. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.749.A. Number of training requests 1.1.1. Number of training requests RECEIVED This measurereceived represents during the thereporting 1.1.1. period. 1.750.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.751.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.752. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.753.A. Number of technical assistance 1.1.1. Number of technical assistance requests RECEIVEDThis measurerequests represents received during the the 1.1.1. reporting period 1.754.

64 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.712.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.713. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.714. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.715.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.716.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.755.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.756. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.757.A. Number of program materials 1.1.1. Number of program materials developed duringThis the measuredeveloped represents the 1.1.1. 1.758.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.759.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.760. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.761.A. Number of planning or training 1.1.1. Number of planning or training events held duringThis the measureactivities represents held during the the 1.1.1. reporting period 1.762.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.763.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.764. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.765.A. Number of people trained 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.766. Number of people trained during the reporting periodThis measure represents the

65 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.712.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.713. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.714. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.715.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.716.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.767.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.768. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.769.A. Number of programs served by 1.1.1. Percent of those served by training and technicalNumber TTA and that percent reported of using an 1.1.1. evidence-based program and / 1.770. or practice. B. Number of programs served by TTA. C. Percent of programs served by TTA that report using an evidence-based program and / or practice (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.771. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.772. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.773. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.774. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.775. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.776. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.777. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.778. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.779.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.780. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.781. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.782.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.783.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.784.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.785. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.786.A. Number of people exhibiting an 1.1.1.1.1. Percent of people exhibiting an increasedThis measureknowledgeincrease represents in of knowledge the post- number of 1.1.787. training. B. Number of people trained during the reporting period. C. Percent of people trained who exhibited increased knowledge (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.788.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.789. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.790.A. Number of programs policies 1.1.1.1.1. Number of program policies changed,This improved, measurechanged or represents during the thereporting number of 1.1.791. period B. Number of programs policies rescinded during the reporting period

66 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.779.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.780. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.781. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.782.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.783.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.792.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.793. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.794.A. The number of organizations 1.1.1.1.1. 442 Percent of organizations reporting improvementsThe numberreporting inand improvements percent of in 1.1.795. operations as a result of TTA one to six months post-service B. The total number of organizations served by TTA during the reporting period C. Percent of organizations reporting improvements (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.796.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.797. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.798.A. Average number of hours per week 1.1.1.1.1. 443 Staff time spent on security Determinestaff spendif project on securityactivities are 1.1.799. B. Average number of hours staff work per week C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.800.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.801. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.802.A. Number of staff to rate training 1.1.1.1.1. 444 Number and percent of staff to rate theMeasure traininghelpful of program quality. 1.1.803. B. Number of staff trained C. Percent (A/B)

67 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.779.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.780. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.781. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.782.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.783.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.804.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.805. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.806.A. Number of staff to take additional 1.1.1.1.1. 445 Number and percent of staff trained whoMeasure taketraining ofadditional staff involvement and 1.1.807. B. Number of staff trained C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.808.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.809. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.810.A. Number of sick days taken 1.1.1.1.1. 1.1.811. 446 Number and percent of sick days takenMeasureB. Number of staff of moralepossible based workdays on the C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.812.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.813. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.814.A. Number of late arrival days 1.1.1.1.1. 1.1.815. 447 Number and percent days employeesMeasure areB. lateNumber ofto staffwork of moralepossible based workdays on the C. Percent (A/B)

68 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.779.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.780. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.781. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.782.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.783.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.816.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.817. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.818.A. Number of staff improved 1.1.1.1.1. 1.1.819. 448 Number and percent of staff rated as MeasureimprovedB. Number of by training of staff benefit evaluated based on C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.820.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.821. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.822.A. Number of staff to leave program 1.1.1.1.1. 1.1.823. 449 Number and percent of staff to leave MeasuretheB. office/unitNumber of staff of satisfactionstaff in program based on C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.824.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.825. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.826.A. Number of hours youth are held in 1.1.1.1.1. 450 Number of hours that youth are held Measuresin isolationisolation use of secure detention. 1.1.827.

69 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.779.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.780. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.781. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.782.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.783.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.828.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.829. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.830.A. Number of youth held in isolation 1.1.1.1.1. 1.1.831. 451 Number and percent of youth exhibitingMustB. the selectNumber desired at ofleast youth one served measure C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.832.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.833. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.834.A. Average number of hours from 1.1.1.1.1. 452 Average time in hours from infractionMeasure to sanctioninfraction of system to sanction accountability. 1.1.835.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.836.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.837. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.838.A. Number of accountability options 1.1.1.1.1. 453 Number and percent of available accountabilityMeasureused of system accountability (i.e., 1.1.839. B. Number of accountability options available C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.840.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.841. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.842.A. Number of modifications of 1.1.1.1.1. 454 Number and percent of sanction changesMeasure thatsanctions ofwere youth to accountability.more strict 1.1.843. B. Number of modifications to sanctions C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.844. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.845.

70 Program Area 17: Reentry 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.846. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.847. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.848. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.849. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.850.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.851.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.852. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.854. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.857.A. Funds awarded to program for 1.1.1.1. Amount of JABG/Tribal JADG fundsThe amountawardedservices of JABG/Tribalfor JADG funds in 1.1.1.8 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.853. 58. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.855. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.856. (Mandatory for System Improvement only)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.859. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.860. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.861.A. Number of different pre-release 1.1.1.1. Number of different pre-release andMeasure post-releaseand of post-release program implementation. programs in operation 1.1.1.8 62.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.863. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.864. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.865.A. Number of dollars spent on pre- 1.1.1.1. 457 Amount of funds allocated to pre-releaseDeterminerelease and the post- and distribution post-release of the programming money. 1.1.1.8 66.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.867. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.868. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.869.A. Number of pre-release and post- 1.1.1.1. Number of pre-release and post-releaseDetermine release program program slots slots scope. Appropriate for 1.1.1.8 70.

71 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.847. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.848. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.849. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.850.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.851.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.871. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.872. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.873.A. Number of staff trained 1.1.1.1. Number and percent of staff trainedMeasure on pre-release of system and accountability based on 1.1.1.8 B. Number of staff 74. C. Percent (a/b)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.875. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.876. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.877.A. Number of hours of orientation 1.1.1.1. Number of hours of pre-release andMeasure post-releasetraining of infrastructure. offered Appropriate for 1.1.1.8 78. B. Number of hours of continuing education training offered C. Number of hours of cross training offered

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.879. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.880. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.881.A. Number of hours of community outreach 1.1.1.1. Number of hours of community outreachMeasureabout about of infrastructure.pre-release pre- and Appropriate post-release for 1.1.1.8 programming 82.

72 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.847. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.848. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.849. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.850.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.851.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.883. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.884. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.885.A. Number of training requests received 1.1.1.1. Number of training requests RECEIVEDThis measureduring the represents reporting the period. number of 1.1.1.8 86.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.887. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.888. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.889.A. Number of technical assistance requests 1.1.1.1. Number of technical assistance requestsThis measurereceived RECEIVED representsduring the thereporting number period of 1.1.1.8 90.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.891. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.892. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.893.A. Number of program materials developed 1.1.1.1. Number of program materials developedThis measure during representsthe the number of 1.1.1.8 94.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.895. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.896. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.897.A. Number of planning or training activities 1.1.1.1. Number of planning or training eventsThis measureheldheld duringduring represents thethe reporting the number period of 1.1.1.8 98.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.899. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.900. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.901.A. Number of people trained 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.902. Number of people trained during theThis reporting measure period represents the number of

73 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.847. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.848. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.849. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.850.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.851.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.903. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.904. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.905.A. Number of programs served by TTA that 1.1.1.1. Percent of those served by trainingNumber andreported technical and percent using an of evidence-basedprograms served 1.1.1.9 program and / or practice. 06. B. Number of programs served by TTA C. Percent of programs served by TTA that report using an evidence-based program and / or practice (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.907. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.908. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.909. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.910. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.911. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.912. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.913. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.914. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.915. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.916. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.917. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.918.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.919.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.920. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.921. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.922.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.923. 1.1.1.1 Number of program policies changed,This improved,Number measure of or programs represents policies the number changed of . during the reporting period 1.1.1.9 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.924. 25. Number of programs policies rescinded during the reporting period

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.926. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.927. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.928.A. Number of people exhibiting an 1.1.1.1 Percent of people exhibiting an increasedThis measure knowledgeincrease representsin ofknowledge the post-training. number of . 1.1.1.9 B. Number of people trained during the 29. reporting period. C. Percent of people trained who exhibited increased knowledge (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.930. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.931. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.932.A. The number of organizations reporting 1.1.1.1 470 Percent of organizations reporting improvementsThe numberimprovements andin percent in operations of as a . result of TTA one to six months post- 1.1.1.9 service 33. B. The total number of organizations served by TTA during the reporting period C. Percent of organizations reporting improvements (A/B)

74 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.915. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.916. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.917. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.918.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.919.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.934. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.935. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.936.A. Number of youth to participate in pre- 1.1.1.1 471 Number and percent of target youth Measureto receiverelease of pre- system and post-release accountability. . 1.1.1.9 Number of youth served B. 37. C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.938. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.939. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.940.A. Number of pre-release and post- 1.1.1.1 472 Number of different pre-release and Determinepost-releaserelease coverage options ofavailable the pre-release . 1.1.1.9 41.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.942. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.943. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.944.A. Average number of types of service 1.1.1.1 473 Average number of different servicesMeasure and treatmentsreceived of system per client accountability. . 1.1.1.9 45.

75 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.915. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.916. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.917. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.918.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.919.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.946. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.947. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.948.A. Number of offenders to receive skills- 1.1.1.1 474 Number and percent of offenders to receiveMeasurebuilding skills of youth training accountability. . 1.1.1.9 Number of offenders handled B. 49. C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.950. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.951. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.952.A. Number of youth to successfully 1.1.1.1 475 Number and percent of youth to successfullyMeasurecomplete completeof youth their accountability. pre-release and post- . release requirements 1.1.1.9 53. B. Number of youth to have pre-release and post-release requirements C. Percent (A/B)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.954. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.955. Narrative Questions 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.956. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.957. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.958. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.959. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.960. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.961. # Measure Definition Info Grantee Provides

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.962. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.963. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.965.A. Open ended text response (5000 1 What were your characters) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.966.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.964.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.967. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.968. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.969.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.970. 2 What goals were A. Open ended text response (5000 characters) B.

76 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.958. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.959. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.960. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.961. # Measure Definition Info Grantee Provides 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.971. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.972. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.973.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.974. 3 What problems/barriers A. Open ended text response (5000 characters) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.975.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.976. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.977. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.978.A. Yes/ No 4 Is there any assistance 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.979. If yes, please explain.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.980. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.981. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.982.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.983. 5 Are you on track to fiscally A. Open ended text response (5000 characters) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.984. (Please answer YES or NO and if no, please explain.)

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.985. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.986. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.987.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.988. 6 What major activities are A. Open ended text response (5000 characters) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.989. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.990. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.991. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.992.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.993. 7 Based on your knowledge A. Open ended text response (5000 characters) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.994.

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.995. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.996. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.997. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.998. APPENDIX C 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.999. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1000. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1001. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1002. JABG Application 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1003. Scoring Form 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1004. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1005. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1006. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1007.

77 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1008. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1009. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1010. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1011. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1012. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1013. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1014. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1015. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1016. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1017. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1018. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1019. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1020. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1021. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1022. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1023. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1024. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1025. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1026. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1027. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1028. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1029. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1030. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1031. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1032. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1033. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1034. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1035. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1036. Juvenile Justice Programs Grant Score Sheet

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1037. Application #A______Grant Program Title:______1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1038. County:______Request for Grant Year: 1 2 or 3 Funds Requested: $______

78 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1039. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1043.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1044. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1040. . 1.1 . 1.1 . 1.1 04 1.

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 42 . SP

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1045. 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1057. REQUIREMENTS 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1058. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1046. 1. If the answer to 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1059. 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1060. 1. 1. 10 47 . Do

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 48 . Do

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 79

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 50 . If

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 51 . If

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 52 . If

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 53 . If

80 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 54 .

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 55 . Do

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 56 . If

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1061. 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1064.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1065. BUDGET 1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1062. 1. Should be clear and consistent with Project Description 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 63 . Pr

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1068.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1069. 1. 81 Bu

1. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1072.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1073. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 10 71 . Bu

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1074. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1075. BUDGET NOTES AND COMMENTS 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1076. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1078.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1079.

1.1 07 7. TOT

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1080. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1081. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1082. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1084.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1085. PROBLEM STATEMENT . 1.1 . 1.1 . 1.1 08 3. A

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1086. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1087.

82 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1088. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1090.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1091. NEEDS ASSESSMENT . 1.1 . 1.1 . 1.1 08 9. The

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1092. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1093. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1094. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1096.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1097. PROJECT DESCRIPTION . 1.1 . 1.1 . 1.1 09 5. The

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1098. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1100.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1101. PROJECT OBJECTIVES . 1.1 . 1.1 . 1.1 09 9. Proj

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1102. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1103. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1104. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1106.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1107. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS . 1.1 . 1.1 . 1.1 10 5. The

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1108. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1109.

83 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1110. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1113.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1114. TARGET . 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1111. 1.1 POPULATION . 1.1 . 1.1 11 2. Ide

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1115. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1116. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1117. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1119.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1120. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE . 1.1 . 1.1 . 1.1 11 8. Incl

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1121. 1.1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1123.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1124. . 1.1 . 1.1 . 1.1 12 2. MA

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1125. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1126. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1127. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1128. APPENDIX D 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1129. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1130. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1131. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1132. Sample Detention Alternative Programs

84 Alternatives to Juvenile Pre-trial Detention 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1133. Home or Community Detention 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1134. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1135. • Program Generally 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1136. • these programs started in the late 1970s 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1137. • either public employees or community- based non-profit agencies run these programs 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1138. • Program Elements 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1139. • many programs enter into a written agreement between the youth and his parents to establish clear behavioral expectations 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1140. • these contracts clarify where the youth may go and expectations for school and employment 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1141. • the responsibilities of the parent are also outlined 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1142. • many program use electronic monitoring in 1 of 2 situations: 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1143. • as a more restrictive option for youth who have failed to comply with standard program rules (this should be in addition to face-to-face contacts – not in their place); or 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1144. • as a means to release youth who might not otherwise meet routine program eligibility criteria 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1145. • Target Population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1146. • youth who can safely reside in their own homes or with relatives 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1147. • the youth observe a weekday curfew (e.g., 6:00 p.m.) and must restrict their movement outside of home to pre-approved activities (including location & time of these activities) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1148. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1149. • home detention staff provides frequent, random, unannounced face-to-face community supervision to monitor youth’s behavior 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1150. • staff keeps in contact with the youth through frequent telephone calls 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1151. • a violation does not necessarily result in return to secured detention – staff first considers increased supervision 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1152. • Capacity 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1153. • the capacity varies depending on the program, but the average capacity is just under 200 youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1154. • Length of Stay 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1155. • this varies depending on the program, but the average length of stay is between 30 and 45 days 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1156. • Cost 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1157. • they are more cost-efficient than secure detention – on average $10 per day per youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1158. • Successful Completion Rate 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1159. • they have remarkable success rates: 90% - 95% make all of their court appearances and remain arrest-free 85 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1160. • Sample Location: Multnomah County • Program Generally • all youth are started at the same contact levels, but alters supervision levels weekly depending on compliance with the program (i.e., a youth’s curfew may be eased or he may be able to attend a special activity) 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1161. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1162. • hourly workers from Volunteers of America work with the detention program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1163. • Program Elements 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1164. • Week 1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1165. • 4 calls per day from the youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1166. • 2 face-to-face daily 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1167. • 2 face-to-face curfew checks a week 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1168. • 5 curfew phone checks 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1169. • Week 2 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1170. • 3 calls per day from the youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1171. • 1 face-to-face daily 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1172. • 2 curfew checks a week 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1173. • Week 3 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1174. • 2 calls per day from the youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1175. • 3 face-to-face contacts a week 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1176. • Week 4 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1177. • 1 call per day from the youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1178. • 2 face-to-face contacts a week 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1179. • Sample Location: Sacramento County 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1180. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1181. • the probation department operates this program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1182. • Program Elements 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1183. • the officers conduct unannounced home and school visits, make collateral contacts and install electronic monitoring devices when needed

1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1184. • Capacity 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1185. • 160 youth are supervised daily 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1186. • Cost 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1187. • daily costs for supervision is approximately $16 per youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1188. • Sample Location: Cook County 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1189. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1190. • probation staff operates this program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1191. • each team of probation officers (2 officers make up a team) is responsible for 25 cases 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1192. • Program Elements

86 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1193. • at least 3 weekly face-to-face contacts in youth’s home 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1194. • random telephone conversations 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1195. • youth restricted to home except for school and church and other approved activities 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1196. • collateral contacts to check on school attendance and other activities 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1197. • electronic monitoring as needed 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1198. • the parent must be willing and cooperative 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1199. • Target Population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1200. • secure detention-eligible youths with no more than 1 outstanding arrest warrant and no previous failures on home confinement 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1201. • willing and cooperative parent 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1202. • Length of Stay 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1203. • the length of stay in program is generally 30 – 45 days 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1204. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1205. • Cost 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1206. • daily costs for supervision is approximately $10 per youth CAPACITY 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. • the program has a capacity of 225 youths 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2. • on average, between 180 and 200 youths make up the average daily population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3. • Successful Completion Rate 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.4. • 91% of participants remain arrest-free and make their court hearings during their time in the program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.5. • Sample Location: Philadelphia Youth Advocate Program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.6. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.7. • non-profit, private agency trains community residents to operate this program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.8. • a staff member supervises no more than 4 youth at a time 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.9. • Program Elements 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.10. • 15 – 30 hours a week of face-to-face supervision in the community 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11. • youths are referred to recreational, educational, and vocational opportunities in the community 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.12. • daily checks on school attendance and curfews 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.13. • electronic monitoring as needed 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.14. • staff accompanies all youth to court appearances 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.15. • Target Population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.16. • secure detention-eligible youths referred by court 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.17. • Cost

87 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.18. • 15 supervised hours a week costs $225 per week, per youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.19. • 30 supervised hours a week costs $325 per week, per youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.20. • Successful Completion Rate 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.21. • 92% of participants remain arrest-free and make their court hearings during their time in the program

88 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.22. Day and Evening Reporting Centers 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.23. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.24. • Program Generally 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.25. • non-secure community programs that provide 6 to 12 hours of daily supervision and structured activities for youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.26. • these youth require more intensive oversight than an in-home program can provide because they are often not enrolled in school at the time of their release from detention 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.27. • the community is protected by the center’s intensive daily supervision of each youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.28. • electronic monitoring is used as needed • Length of Stay 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.29. • the length of stay for youths is approximately 30 days • Cost 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.30. • the cost for supervision is between $32 and $35 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.31. • Sample Location: Broward County, FL 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.32. • Program Generally 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.33. • day reporting is used in conjunction with non-secure residential placements 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.34. • youth participate in educational and recreational programming at the day reporting center that could not be offered at their group home 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.35. • Sample Location: Cook County • Program Generally • this county created a system of evening reporting centers that provide structure and supervision for youth between 3:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.36. • over 60% of the referrals to the evening reporting centers would have been sent to secure detention if the evening reporting centers did not exist 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.37. • Program Elements 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.38. • 6 hours of daily supervision, tutoring, counseling and recreation 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.39. • curfew checks 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.40. • evening meals and transportation home 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.41. • youths are referred for additional recreational, educational, and vocational opportunities in the community 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.42. • collateral checks on school attendance and school work 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.43. • program supervision can be enhanced by linking participants to home confinement program and/or electronic monitoring 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.44. • Target Population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.45. • secure detention-eligible youths

89 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.46. • chronic VOPs 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.47. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.48. • non-profit, community-based service organizations train community staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.49. • each staff member supervises no more than 5 youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.50. • Length of Stay 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.51. • the length of stay for youths is approximately 21 – 30 days 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.52. • Cost 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.53. • the cost for supervision is $33 per youth per day 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.54. • Successful Completion Rate 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.55. • 90% of youth make their court hearings; remain arrest-free while in the program

90 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.56. Residential Alternatives 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.57. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.58. • Program Generally – Shelter Program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.59. • a non-secure residential facility staffed to provide time- limited housing 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.60. • this alternative provides age-specific services including education, recreation, tutoring, and life skill training 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.61. • some students attend education at the shelter whereas others attend public school 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.62. • shelters are staffed to handle emergency medical situations 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.63. • Target Population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.64. • this is for youth who need 24-hour supervision to be considered for release from secure detention 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.65. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.66. • youth are supervised by staff 24 hours a day, 7 days a week – staff must report even when shelter population is low and should represent the ethnic diversity of the shelter’s population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.67. • Length of Stay 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.68. • the length of time in a shelter generally does not exceed 30 days 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.69. • Cost 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.70. • the cost is $90 - $130 per youth, per day 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.71. • Sample Location: New York 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.72. • Program Generally 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.73. • it is the most restrictive detention alternative within the detention continuum 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.74. • Target Population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.75. • this program is directed towards higher risk youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.76. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.77. • requires a minimum direct staffing ratio of 1 staff per 6 youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.78. • an on-site director and case manager must always be on site 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.79. • Sample Location: Cook County 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.80. • Program Generally 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.81. • many youth stay in the shelter while they await a slot in non-secure residential treatment alternative 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.82. • Program elements 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.83. • 24-hour residential supervision 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.84. • educational instruction 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.85. • independent living skills 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.86. • individual and group counseling 91 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.87. • transportation to court & other required appointments 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.88. • probation outreach to arrange return to parental custody 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.89. • Target Population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.90. • lower risk youth for whom no family member has been identified or is available 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.91. • youth designated by judicial order as “release upon request” 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.92. • Staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.93. • non-profit community-based agency trains professional and non-professional staff 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.94. • Capacity 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.95. • this program holds up to 20 youths 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.96. • Length of Stay 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.97. • a youth’s stay does not exceed 30 days and is generally only a few days 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.98. • Sample Location: Sacramento County 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.99. • Program Generally 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.100. • rather than developing a separate shelter, this program contracts with existing group care providers to reserve beds for youth 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.101. • a downside is that mixing pre-trial youth with another client population does not work too well because the existing program is not equipped to handle the challenges these youth present 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.102. • Cost 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.103. • this is cost-efficient and administratively convenient because they avoid start-up costs and early-program dilemmas 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.104. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.105. 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.106. Foster Care 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.107. • Program Generally • foster care is used to supplement the non-secure residential program 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.108. • foster parents are given special training about youth referred by the juvenile justice system and have access to staff resources for help 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.109. • Target Population 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.110. • this program targets younger children, girls, lower-risk cases, and other youth who are 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.111. not suitable for a group care facility 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.112. • younger children in particular are better suited for foster care 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.113. • Sample Location: Multnomah County 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.114. • this program contracts with the Boys and Girls’ Society, a private child care agency, for individualized host home slots, paying on an as-used basis