If You Are in Private Practice, What Is the Size of Your Firm?

2014 EMI, Litchfield Park, AZ 03/10/2014

If you are in private practice, what is the size of your firm? # Answer Response % 1 Solo 2 13% 2-15 2 2 13% Attorneys 16-99 3 2 13% Attorneys 100+ 4 9 60% Attorneys Total 15 100%

Statistic Value Min Value 1 Max Value 4 Mean 3.20 Variance 1.31 Standard Deviation 1.15 Total Responses 15

How many years have practiced law? # Answer Response % 1 0-5 years 6 24% 2 5-10 years 1 4% More than 10 3 17 68% years I do not 4 1 4% practice law Total 25 100%

Statistic Value Min Value 1 Max Value 4 Mean 2.52 Variance 0.84 Standard Deviation 0.92 Total Responses 25 Please select the range that fits your age: # Answer Response % 1 18-25 0 0% 2 26-40 6 23% 3 41-60 11 42% 4 61 and over 9 35% Total 26 100%

Please choose the location that best describes where you reside/practice: # Answer Response % 1 East Coast 3 12% 2 West Coast 5 20% 3 Midwest 4 16% 4 South 11 44% 5 Other 2 8% Total 25 100%

How would you best describe your practice? # Answer Response % Private 1 14 54% practitioner In-House 2 6 23% Counsel 3 Government 2 8% 4 Academic 1 4% 5 Law student 1 4% 6 Supplier 0 0% 7 Other 2 8% Total 26 100% Statistic Value Min Value 1 Max Value 7 Mean 2.12 Variance 3.15 Standard Deviation 1.77 Total Responses 26

How long have you been a member of the ABA Health Law Section? # Answer Response % 1 0-5 years 13 50% 2 5-10 years 4 15% More than 10 3 7 27% years I am not a member of 4 the ABA 2 8% Health Law Section Total 26 100%

Did you visit any of the exhibitor tables? # Answer Response % 1 Yes 21 88% 2 No 3 13% 3 Comments: 0 0% Total 24 100%

Comments:

Statistic Value Min Value 1 Max Value 2 Mean 1.13 Variance 0.11 Standard Deviation 0.34 Total Responses 24 What format do you prefer for written materials and power point presentations? # Answer Response % 1 Printed book 4 15% 2 Flash drive 9 35% 3 Online 10 38% 4 Hand outs 3 12% Total 26 100%

Please rank the following factors in order of how they influenced your decision to attend: Total # Answer 1 2 3 4 5 6 Responses 1 Location 5 4 5 6 2 0 22 2 Cost 2 5 2 4 7 0 20 3 CLE 3 3 5 6 2 0 19 Networking 4 3 8 3 4 4 0 22 Opportunities 5 Sessions/Speakers 8 3 7 1 3 0 22 Other (Please 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 describe) Total 24 23 22 21 18 0 -

Other (Please describe) program reputation task force meeting leadership role; speaker at IG luncheon Other Networking Statistic Location Cost CLE Sessions/Speakers (Please Opportunities describe) Min Value 1 1 1 1 1 1 Max Value 5 5 5 5 5 1 Mean 2.82 3.45 3.05 2.91 2.45 1.00 Variance 1.77 2.16 1.61 1.90 1.97 0.00 Standard 1.33 1.47 1.27 1.38 1.41 0.00 Deviation Total 22 20 19 22 22 3 Responses

How did you hear about this conference? (check all that apply) # Answer Response % 1 Email 15 60% Mailed 2 10 40% brochure 3 Social Media 0 0% From a 4 colleague or 8 32% friend Previously 5 9 36% attended HLS leader (IG, Planning 6 9 36% committee, Council, etc.) 7 Other 0 0%

Statistic Value Min Value 1 Max Value 6 Total Responses 25 What did you enjoy most about the conference: Text Response networking, excellent CLE, location Education, networking, nice weather & location, Fraud & Abuse,. Ethics in Interesting Times were very good programs Diversity of program offerings, size of conference attendees lends itself to network and task force work, interesting diverse groups of attendees Location Networking, Cancer Workshop The networking opportunities and the interest group lunches Presentation Good content and location The Thurs night reception The weather, topics & speakers were timely & informed, not too basic Sessions & the receptions Presentation & setting I enjoyed the broad selection of courses Good topics & networking Outstanding presentations

Statistic Value Total Responses 15 Additional comments or suggestions: Text Response This was a great EMI. The speakers were great. The ability to network was great. The location was quaint. The wireless stunk and was non-existent in my room Speakers (the mechanical not individuals) could have been better, hard to hear in some rooms, individuals could have spoken into mikes better The hotel wireless was very poor in the list of attendees, if it was grouped by region/state and/or practice areas it would be really helpful for networking and for follow up after the conference The conference staff were all excellent, professional, helpful The Thursday 445-545 time slot had three sessions I would have liked to attend, while there was another time I wasn't interested in any. I know this is a common problem with conferences, but might be something to evaluate for next year. "There is No Such Thing as a Compounding Manufacturer!" - I would have liked if this presentation focused more on the recent compounding statutory changes and moving forward instead of so much background Internet access was terrible Please do not schedule conferences at hotels that have inadequate internet bandwidth. This should be a primary consideration in this day & age. Internet bandwidth here was atrocious Need internet in conference, should be a factor in selection of location. Would like to see speaker names in schedule I would have liked printed slides to take notes while the speakers spoke "A Mid-Course Report Card....." - very interesting & educational on how it is all coming together. Some effort to identify legal issues would be of value. Apodaca is a tedious presenter, E. Ryan is really interesting, Sreckovich is really good. "Fraud & Abuse" had clearly a group of experts with good focus on emerging trends. "Ethics in Interesting Times...." - Homchick & Horton are two keepers, actually a real conversation on ethics. "Life Sciences..." was a well-constructed discussion that illustrated issues well. "Ambien, Anyone?" was a real conversation about the root causes of health care enforcement. I have lived this and these speakers are genuine. "A Frank Conversation....." - too much a political effort to enlist attendees in own agenda, didn't like that, not education. "Deciphering the Self-Disclosure Puzzle" - Mathias is an awkward presenter, not very focused on self-disclosure for his part, very weak program, technical glitches. "Expanded Liability for Payors...." - good, genuine details revealing both know-how & good prediction of specific ACA problems/legal

Statistic Value Total Responses 11 Please rate the following: Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses The registration fee was priced in line with the products 1 received (i.e. 6 11 1 0 18 CLE sessions, receptions, luncheons) The programming was appropriate 2 10 9 0 0 19 for my background and interests I obtained new ideas that will be 3 8 11 0 0 19 useful in my work I learned or acquired new 4 skills that I plan 6 11 2 0 19 to apply to my current position The content and experience 5 matched the 8 11 0 0 19 promotional materials A sufficient amount of time 6 was allocated for 7 11 1 0 19 delivery of the program content Overall I am satisfied with the 7 value I received 9 10 0 0 19 with this learning experience The hotel accommodations 8 10 6 1 1 18 met my expectations The food and 9 beverage met 8 10 1 0 19 my expectations The I A registration learned sufficient Overall I fee was I or The The amount am priced in obtaine acquired programming content and of time satisfied The food line with d new new The hotel was experience was with the and the ideas skills accommodations Statistic appropriate matched allocated value I beverage products that will that I met my for my the for received met my received be plan to expectations background promotional delivery with this expectations (i.e. CLE useful in apply to and interests materials of the learning sessions, my work my program experience receptions, current content luncheons) position Min Value 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Max Value 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 4 3 Mean 1.72 1.47 1.58 1.79 1.58 1.68 1.53 1.61 1.63 Variance 0.33 0.26 0.26 0.40 0.26 0.34 0.26 0.72 0.36 Standard 0.57 0.51 0.51 0.63 0.51 0.58 0.51 0.85 0.60 Deviation Total 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 19 Responses

The Real World: Health Law – An Introduction to the Fundamentals of Health Law

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Jonathan 1 7 1 0 0 8 Anderman Matthew 2 7 1 0 0 8 Fisher Geeta 3 7 1 0 0 8 Kaveti Alexandra 4 5 3 0 0 8 Plasencia Tracy 5 7 0 0 0 7 Powell

Jonathan Matthew Alexandra Statistic Geeta Kaveti Tracy Powell Anderman Fisher Plasencia Min Value 1 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 1 Mean 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.38 1.00 Variance 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.27 0.00 Standard 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.52 0.00 Deviation Total 8 8 8 8 7 Responses Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Jonathan 1 6 1 0 0 7 Anderman Matthew 2 6 1 0 0 7 Fisher Geeta 3 6 1 0 0 7 Kaveti Alexandra 4 2 5 0 0 7 Plasencia Tracy 5 5 1 0 0 6 Powell

Jonathan Matthew Alexandra Statistic Geeta Kaveti Tracy Powell Anderman Fisher Plasencia Min Value 1 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.71 1.17 Variance 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.24 0.17 Standard 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.41 Deviation Total 7 7 7 7 6 Responses

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Jonathan 1 6 1 0 0 7 Anderman Matthew 2 6 1 0 0 7 Fisher Geeta 3 6 1 0 0 7 Kaveti Alexandra 4 2 5 0 0 7 Plasencia Tracy 5 5 1 0 0 6 Powell Jonathan Matthew Alexandra Statistic Geeta Kaveti Tracy Powell Anderman Fisher Plasencia Min Value 1 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.71 1.17 Variance 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.24 0.17 Standard 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.41 Deviation Total 7 7 7 7 6 Responses

A Mid-Course Report Card on Healthcare Reform

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Michelle 1 14 7 1 0 22 Apodaca Elizabeth 2 15 6 0 0 21 Ryan Kathleen 3 Scully- 12 8 0 0 20 Hayes Catherine 4 14 8 0 0 22 Sreckovich

Michelle Kathleen Scully- Catherine Statistic Elizabeth Ryan Apodaca Hayes Sreckovich Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 3 2 2 2 Mean 1.41 1.29 1.40 1.36 Variance 0.35 0.21 0.25 0.24 Standard 0.59 0.46 0.50 0.49 Deviation Total Responses 22 21 20 22 Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Kathleen 3 Scully- 10 9 0 0 19 Hayes Catherine 4 11 10 0 0 21 Sreckovich Elizabeth 2 11 8 1 0 20 Ryan Michelle 1 8 12 1 0 21 Apodaca

Michelle Kathleen Scully- Catherine Statistic Elizabeth Ryan Apodaca Hayes Sreckovich Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 3 3 2 2 Mean 1.67 1.50 1.47 1.48 Variance 0.33 0.37 0.26 0.26 Standard 0.58 0.61 0.51 0.51 Deviation Total Responses 21 20 19 21

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Michelle 1 10 10 1 0 21 Apodaca Elizabeth 2 13 7 0 0 20 Ryan Kathleen 3 Scully- 11 8 0 0 19 Hayes Catherine 4 13 8 0 0 21 Sreckovich

Michelle Kathleen Scully- Catherine Statistic Elizabeth Ryan Apodaca Hayes Sreckovich Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 3 2 2 2 Mean 1.57 1.35 1.42 1.38 Variance 0.36 0.24 0.26 0.25 Standard 0.60 0.49 0.51 0.50 Deviation Total Responses 21 20 19 21 Fraud & Abuse (Enforcement Update)

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Gregory 1 22 2 0 0 24 Demske Pamela 2 22 1 0 0 23 Johnson Linda 3 22 1 0 0 23 Kontos Cathy 4 22 1 0 0 23 Ostiller

Statistic Gregory Demske Pamela Johnson Linda Kontos Cathy Ostiller Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.08 1.04 1.04 1.04 Variance 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.04 Standard 0.28 0.21 0.21 0.21 Deviation Total Responses 24 23 23 23

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Gregory 1 17 6 0 0 23 Demske Pamela 2 18 3 0 0 21 Johnson Linda 3 19 3 0 0 22 Kontos Cathy 4 19 3 0 0 22 Ostiller

Statistic Gregory Demske Pamela Johnson Linda Kontos Cathy Ostiller Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.26 1.14 1.14 1.14 Variance 0.20 0.13 0.12 0.12 Standard 0.45 0.36 0.35 0.35 Deviation Total Responses 23 21 22 22 Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Gregory 1 17 6 0 0 23 Demske Pamela 2 17 4 0 0 21 Johnson Linda 3 18 4 0 0 22 Kontos Cathy 4 17 4 0 0 21 Ostiller

Statistic Gregory Demske Pamela Johnson Linda Kontos Cathy Ostiller Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.26 1.19 1.18 1.19 Variance 0.20 0.16 0.16 0.16 Standard 0.45 0.40 0.39 0.40 Deviation Total Responses 23 21 22 21

Breast Cancer Legal Advocacy Workshop

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Stephanie 1 2 0 0 0 2 Fajuri Jason 2 2 0 0 0 2 Lacey Michelle 3 2 0 0 0 2 Matheson Kristi 4 2 0 0 0 2 Morley Coral 5 2 0 0 0 2 Quiet Hilary 6 2 0 0 0 2 Young Stephanie Jason Michelle Kristi Hilary Statistic Coral Quiet Fajuri Lacey Matheson Morley Young Min Value 1 1 1 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Deviation Total 2 2 2 2 2 2 Responses

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Stephanie 1 2 0 0 0 2 Fajuri Jason 2 2 0 0 0 2 Lacey Michelle 3 2 0 0 0 2 Matheson Kristi 4 2 0 0 0 2 Morley Coral 5 2 0 0 0 2 Quiet Hilary 6 2 0 0 0 2 Young

Stephanie Jason Michelle Kristi Hilary Statistic Coral Quiet Fajuri Lacey Matheson Morley Young Min Value 1 1 1 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Deviation Total 2 2 2 2 2 2 Responses Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Stephanie 1 2 0 0 0 2 Fajuri Jason 2 2 0 0 0 2 Lacey Michelle 3 2 0 0 0 2 Matheson Kristi 4 2 0 0 0 2 Morley Coral 5 2 0 0 0 2 Quiet Hilary 6 2 0 0 0 2 Young

Stephanie Jason Michelle Kristi Hilary Statistic Coral Quiet Fajuri Lacey Matheson Morley Young Min Value 1 1 1 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Deviation Total 2 2 2 2 2 2 Responses

Women in Leadership Workshop: Succeeding as a Woman in the Workplace

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Beth 1 Connor 2 1 0 0 3 Guest Alexandria 2 Hien 2 1 0 0 3 McCombs Cindy 3 3 0 0 0 3 Pladziewicz Kathleen 4 Scully- 2 1 0 0 3 Hayes Beth Connor Alexandria Hien Cindy Kathleen Scully- Statistic Guest McCombs Pladziewicz Hayes Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 1 2 Mean 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.33 Variance 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.33 Standard 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.58 Deviation Total Responses 3 3 3 3

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Beth 1 Connor 2 1 0 0 3 Guest Alexandria 2 Hien 2 1 0 0 3 McCombs Cindy 3 3 0 0 0 3 Pladziewicz Kathleen 4 Scully- 2 1 0 0 3 Hayes

Beth Connor Alexandria Hien Cindy Kathleen Scully- Statistic Guest McCombs Pladziewicz Hayes Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 1 2 Mean 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.33 Variance 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.33 Standard 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.58 Deviation Total Responses 3 3 3 3 Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Beth 1 Connor 3 0 0 0 3 Guest Alexandria 2 Hien 3 0 0 0 3 McCombs Cindy 3 3 0 0 0 3 Pladziewicz Kathleen 4 Scully- 3 0 0 0 3 Hayes

Beth Connor Alexandria Hien Cindy Kathleen Scully- Statistic Guest McCombs Pladziewicz Hayes Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Deviation Total Responses 3 3 3 3

Ethics in Interesting Times: Advising Clients in a Shifting Regulatory and Enforcement Environment

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Robert 1 18 4 0 0 22 Homchick William 2 20 3 0 0 23 Horton

Statistic Robert Homchick William Horton Min Value 1 1 Max Value 2 2 Mean 1.18 1.13 Variance 0.16 0.12 Standard Deviation 0.39 0.34 Total Responses 22 23 Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Robert 1 17 5 0 0 22 Homchick William 2 18 4 0 0 22 Horton

Statistic Robert Homchick William Horton Min Value 1 1 Max Value 2 2 Mean 1.23 1.18 Variance 0.18 0.16 Standard Deviation 0.43 0.39 Total Responses 22 22

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Robert 1 17 5 0 0 22 Homchick William 2 18 4 0 0 22 Horton

Statistic Robert Homchick William Horton Min Value 1 1 Max Value 2 2 Mean 1.23 1.18 Variance 0.18 0.16 Standard Deviation 0.43 0.39 Total Responses 22 22

It's Not Too Complicated: Presenting Complex Medical Information to Judges and Juries

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Robert 1 7 1 0 0 8 Graziano Suann 2 7 0 0 0 7 Ingle Gary 3 6 1 0 0 7 Keilty Statistic Robert Graziano Suann Ingle Gary Keilty Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 1 2 Mean 1.13 1.00 1.14 Variance 0.13 0.00 0.14 Standard Deviation 0.35 0.00 0.38 Total Responses 8 7 7

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Robert 1 6 2 0 0 8 Graziano Suann 2 5 2 0 0 7 Ingle Gary 3 5 2 0 0 7 Keilty

Statistic Robert Graziano Suann Ingle Gary Keilty Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.25 1.29 1.29 Variance 0.21 0.24 0.24 Standard Deviation 0.46 0.49 0.49 Total Responses 8 7 7

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Robert 1 6 2 0 0 8 Graziano Suann 2 5 2 0 0 7 Ingle Gary 3 5 2 0 0 7 Keilty

Statistic Robert Graziano Suann Ingle Gary Keilty Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.25 1.29 1.29 Variance 0.21 0.24 0.24 Standard Deviation 0.46 0.49 0.49 Total Responses 8 7 7 Trends in Employer and Provider Obligations: The Demise of DOMA and the Rise of New HIPAA Wellness Programs Rules

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Howard 1 Bye- 6 1 0 0 7 Torre William 2 5 2 0 0 7 Hopkins Michelle 3 5 2 0 0 7 McCarthy

Statistic Howard Bye-Torre William Hopkins Michelle McCarthy Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.14 1.29 1.29 Variance 0.14 0.24 0.24 Standard Deviation 0.38 0.49 0.49 Total Responses 7 7 7

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Howard 1 Bye- 4 3 0 0 7 Torre William 2 4 3 0 0 7 Hopkins Michelle 3 4 3 0 0 7 McCarthy

Statistic Howard Bye-Torre William Hopkins Michelle McCarthy Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.43 1.43 1.43 Variance 0.29 0.29 0.29 Standard Deviation 0.53 0.53 0.53 Total Responses 7 7 7 Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Howard 1 Bye- 5 2 0 0 7 Torre William 2 5 2 0 0 7 Hopkins Michelle 3 5 2 0 0 7 McCarthy

Statistic Howard Bye-Torre William Hopkins Michelle McCarthy Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.29 1.29 1.29 Variance 0.24 0.24 0.24 Standard Deviation 0.49 0.49 0.49 Total Responses 7 7 7

PODs – What next? The Impact of the OIG’s Special Fraud Alert

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Donald 1 5 1 0 0 6 Romano Lisa D. 2 6 1 0 0 7 Taylor Joseph 3 6 1 0 0 7 Truhe, Jr

Statistic Donald Romano Lisa D. Taylor Joseph Truhe, Jr Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.17 1.14 1.14 Variance 0.17 0.14 0.14 Standard Deviation 0.41 0.38 0.38 Total Responses 6 7 7 Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Donald 1 5 1 0 0 6 Romano Lisa D. 2 5 2 0 0 7 Taylor Joseph 3 6 1 0 0 7 Truhe, Jr

Statistic Donald Romano Lisa D. Taylor Joseph Truhe, Jr Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.17 1.29 1.14 Variance 0.17 0.24 0.14 Standard Deviation 0.41 0.49 0.38 Total Responses 6 7 7

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Donald 1 5 1 0 0 6 Romano Lisa D. 2 6 1 0 0 7 Taylor Joseph 3 6 1 0 0 7 Truhe, Jr

Statistic Donald Romano Lisa D. Taylor Joseph Truhe, Jr Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.17 1.14 1.14 Variance 0.17 0.14 0.14 Standard Deviation 0.41 0.38 0.38 Total Responses 6 7 7 Anatomy of a Valuation - Step by Step Examination of Valuation Opinions

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Andrew 1 3 0 0 0 3 Demetriou Terese 2 2 1 0 0 3 Farhat Chip 3 3 0 0 0 3 Hutzler

Statistic Andrew Demetriou Terese Farhat Chip Hutzler Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 1 2 1 Mean 1.00 1.33 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.33 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.58 0.00 Total Responses 3 3 3

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Andrew 1 1 1 0 0 2 Demetriou Terese 2 1 1 0 0 2 Farhat Chip 3 1 1 0 0 2 Hutzler

Statistic Andrew Demetriou Terese Farhat Chip Hutzler Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.50 1.50 1.50 Variance 0.50 0.50 0.50 Standard Deviation 0.71 0.71 0.71 Total Responses 2 2 2 Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Andrew 1 1 1 0 0 2 Demetriou Terese 2 1 1 0 0 2 Farhat Chip 3 1 1 0 0 2 Hutzler

Statistic Andrew Demetriou Terese Farhat Chip Hutzler Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.50 1.50 1.50 Variance 0.50 0.50 0.50 Standard Deviation 0.71 0.71 0.71 Total Responses 2 2 2

The HIPAA Omnibus Rule Turns One: How Are Business Associates Enjoying Being Invited to the Party?

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Kirk 1 9 0 0 0 9 Nahra Jennifer 2 9 0 0 0 9 Rathburn Joel 3 9 0 0 0 9 Wakefield

Statistic Kirk Nahra Jennifer Rathburn Joel Wakefield Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Responses 9 9 9 Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Kirk 1 9 0 0 0 9 Nahra Jennifer 2 9 0 0 0 9 Rathburn Joel 3 9 0 0 0 9 Wakefield

Statistic Kirk Nahra Jennifer Rathburn Joel Wakefield Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Responses 9 9 9

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Kirk 1 9 0 0 0 9 Nahra Jennifer 2 8 0 0 0 8 Rathburn Joel 3 9 0 0 0 9 Wakefield

Statistic Kirk Nahra Jennifer Rathburn Joel Wakefield Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Responses 9 8 9 A Frank Conversation about the Stark Law: The History and Future of Government Regulation of Physician Referrals

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Troy 1 20 4 0 0 24 Barsky Anthony 2 18 5 0 0 23 Burba Lewis 3 21 3 0 0 24 Morris Kirk 4 20 3 0 0 23 Ogrosky

Statistic Troy Barsky Anthony Burba Lewis Morris Kirk Ogrosky Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.17 1.22 1.13 1.13 Variance 0.14 0.18 0.11 0.12 Standard 0.38 0.42 0.34 0.34 Deviation Total Responses 24 23 24 23

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Troy 1 17 5 1 0 23 Barsky Anthony 2 14 7 1 0 22 Burba Lewis 3 18 4 1 0 23 Morris Kirk 4 15 6 1 0 22 Ogrosky

Statistic Troy Barsky Anthony Burba Lewis Morris Kirk Ogrosky Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 3 3 3 3 Mean 1.30 1.41 1.26 1.36 Variance 0.31 0.35 0.29 0.34 Standard 0.56 0.59 0.54 0.58 Deviation Total Responses 23 22 23 22 Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Troy 1 18 4 1 0 23 Barsky Anthony 2 16 6 0 0 22 Burba Lewis 3 19 4 0 0 23 Morris Kirk 4 17 5 0 0 22 Ogrosky

Statistic Troy Barsky Anthony Burba Lewis Morris Kirk Ogrosky Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 3 2 2 2 Mean 1.26 1.27 1.17 1.23 Variance 0.29 0.21 0.15 0.18 Standard 0.54 0.46 0.39 0.43 Deviation Total Responses 23 22 23 22

”Ambien Anyone?” The Issues That Keep Compliance Officers Awake At Night

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Gwen 1 13 4 0 0 17 Chapman Steve 2 14 3 0 0 17 Hinkle John 3 13 4 0 0 17 Kelly 4 Jeff Miller 12 5 0 0 17

Statistic Gwen Chapman Steve Hinkle John Kelly Jeff Miller Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.24 1.18 1.24 1.29 Variance 0.19 0.15 0.19 0.22 Standard 0.44 0.39 0.44 0.47 Deviation Total Responses 17 17 17 17 Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Gwen 1 11 4 1 0 16 Chapman Steve 2 10 6 0 0 16 Hinkle John 3 10 6 0 0 16 Kelly 4 Jeff Miller 10 6 0 0 16

Statistic Gwen Chapman Steve Hinkle John Kelly Jeff Miller Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 3 2 2 2 Mean 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Variance 0.38 0.25 0.25 0.25 Standard 0.62 0.50 0.50 0.50 Deviation Total Responses 16 16 16 16

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Gwen 1 10 5 0 0 15 Chapman Steve 2 10 5 0 0 15 Hinkle John 3 9 6 0 0 15 Kelly 4 Jeff Miller 10 4 1 0 15

Statistic Gwen Chapman Steve Hinkle John Kelly Jeff Miller Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 3 Mean 1.33 1.33 1.40 1.40 Variance 0.24 0.24 0.26 0.40 Standard 0.49 0.49 0.51 0.63 Deviation Total Responses 15 15 15 15 There is No Such Thing as a Compounding Manufacturer!

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Jay 1 6 0 0 0 6 McEniry W. 2 Thomas 6 0 0 0 6 Smith

Statistic Jay McEniry W. Thomas Smith Min Value 1 1 Max Value 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.00 Total Responses 6 6

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Jay 1 5 0 0 0 5 McEniry W. 2 Thomas 4 1 0 0 5 Smith

Statistic Jay McEniry W. Thomas Smith Min Value 1 1 Max Value 1 2 Mean 1.00 1.20 Variance 0.00 0.20 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.45 Total Responses 5 5

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Jay 1 4 1 0 0 5 McEniry W. 2 Thomas 4 1 0 0 5 Smith Statistic Jay McEniry W. Thomas Smith Min Value 1 1 Max Value 2 2 Mean 1.20 1.20 Variance 0.20 0.20 Standard Deviation 0.45 0.45 Total Responses 5 5

Recent Antitrust Developments in Healthcare and Hospital Mergers; Lessons Learned and Practical Preparation Techniques to Avoid Roadblocks

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses 1 Alicia Batts 6 3 0 0 9 Robert 2 5 2 0 0 7 Baudino Robert 3 6 1 0 0 7 Canterman

Statistic Alicia Batts Robert Baudino Robert Canterman Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.33 1.29 1.14 Variance 0.25 0.24 0.14 Standard Deviation 0.50 0.49 0.38 Total Responses 9 7 7

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses 1 Alicia Batts 6 1 1 0 8 Robert 2 5 1 0 0 6 Baudino Robert 3 5 0 1 0 6 Canterman

Statistic Alicia Batts Robert Baudino Robert Canterman Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 3 2 3 Mean 1.38 1.17 1.33 Variance 0.55 0.17 0.67 Standard Deviation 0.74 0.41 0.82 Total Responses 8 6 6 Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses 1 Alicia Batts 6 0 1 0 7 Robert 2 6 0 0 0 6 Baudino Robert 3 5 0 1 0 6 Canterman

Statistic Alicia Batts Robert Baudino Robert Canterman Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 3 1 3 Mean 1.29 1.00 1.33 Variance 0.57 0.00 0.67 Standard Deviation 0.76 0.00 0.82 Total Responses 7 6 6

Deciphering the Self-Disclosure Puzzle

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses William 1 5 2 1 0 8 Mathias Lisa 2 5 2 0 0 7 Ohrin

Statistic William Mathias Lisa Ohrin Min Value 1 1 Max Value 3 2 Mean 1.50 1.29 Variance 0.57 0.24 Standard Deviation 0.76 0.49 Total Responses 8 7

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses William 1 2 4 2 0 8 Mathias Lisa 2 2 5 0 0 7 Ohrin Statistic William Mathias Lisa Ohrin Min Value 1 1 Max Value 3 2 Mean 2.00 1.71 Variance 0.57 0.24 Standard Deviation 0.76 0.49 Total Responses 8 7

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses William 1 3 4 1 0 8 Mathias Lisa 2 4 1 1 0 6 Ohrin

Statistic William Mathias Lisa Ohrin Min Value 1 1 Max Value 3 3 Mean 1.75 1.50 Variance 0.50 0.70 Standard Deviation 0.71 0.84 Total Responses 8 6

Healthcare M&A Post-Consolidation Roundtable

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Christi 1 11 1 0 0 12 Braun Kenneth 2 Goldblum, 10 2 0 0 12 MD Denise 3 9 2 0 0 11 Hanna Howard 4 10 1 0 0 11 Wall Kenneth Statistic Christi Braun Denise Hanna Howard Wall Goldblum, MD Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.08 1.17 1.18 1.09 Variance 0.08 0.15 0.16 0.09 Standard 0.29 0.39 0.40 0.30 Deviation Total Responses 12 12 11 11

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Christi 1 8 3 1 0 12 Braun Kenneth 2 Goldblum, 9 3 0 0 12 MD Denise 3 8 3 0 0 11 Hanna Howard 4 10 1 0 0 11 Wall

Kenneth Statistic Christi Braun Denise Hanna Howard Wall Goldblum, MD Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 3 2 2 2 Mean 1.42 1.25 1.27 1.09 Variance 0.45 0.20 0.22 0.09 Standard 0.67 0.45 0.47 0.30 Deviation Total Responses 12 12 11 11

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Christi 1 7 5 0 0 12 Braun Kenneth 2 Goldblum, 8 4 0 0 12 MD Denise 3 8 3 0 0 11 Hanna Howard 4 9 2 0 0 11 Wall Kenneth Statistic Christi Braun Denise Hanna Howard Wall Goldblum, MD Min Value 1 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 2 Mean 1.42 1.33 1.27 1.18 Variance 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.16 Standard 0.51 0.49 0.47 0.40 Deviation Total Responses 12 12 11 11

Shedding Some Light: Reporting Obligations and Compliance Implications of the Sunshine Act

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Sefanie 1 3 0 0 0 3 Doebler Abraham 2 3 0 0 0 3 Gitterman Doug 3 3 0 0 0 3 Brown

Statistic Sefanie Doebler Abraham Gitterman Anita Griner Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Responses 3 3 3

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Sefanie 1 2 0 0 0 2 Doebler Abraham 2 2 0 0 0 2 Gitterman Doug 3 2 0 0 0 2 Brown Statistic Sefanie Doebler Abraham Gitterman Anita Griner Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Responses 2 2 2

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Sefanie 1 2 0 0 0 2 Doebler Abraham 2 2 0 0 0 2 Gitterman Doug 3 2 0 0 0 2 Brown

Statistic Sefanie Doebler Abraham Gitterman Anita Griner Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 Variance 0.00 0.00 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Responses 2 2 2

Expanded Liability for Payors under the False Claims Act: Escalating Risk and Response for Managed Care Organizations

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Laurence 1 3 0 0 0 3 Freedman Gabriel 2 2 1 0 0 3 Imperato Stephen 3 2 1 0 0 3 Sullivan Statistic Laurence Freedman Gabriel Imperato Stephen Sullivan Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 1 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.33 1.33 Variance 0.00 0.33 0.33 Standard Deviation 0.00 0.58 0.58 Total Responses 3 3 3

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Laurence 1 1 1 0 0 2 Freedman Gabriel 2 1 2 0 0 3 Imperato Stephen 3 1 2 0 0 3 Sullivan

Statistic Laurence Freedman Gabriel Imperato Stephen Sullivan Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.50 1.67 1.67 Variance 0.50 0.33 0.33 Standard Deviation 0.71 0.58 0.58 Total Responses 2 3 3

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Laurence 1 1 2 0 0 3 Freedman Gabriel 2 2 1 0 0 3 Imperato Stephen 3 1 1 0 0 2 Sullivan

Statistic Laurence Freedman Gabriel Imperato Stephen Sullivan Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.67 1.33 1.50 Variance 0.33 0.33 0.50 Standard Deviation 0.58 0.58 0.71 Total Responses 3 3 2 Responding to a Government Subpoena: Assuring Quality and Avoiding Pitfalls in the Age of E-Discovery

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Joel 1 5 3 0 0 8 Androphy Ross 2 6 2 0 0 8 Goldstein Carol 3 5 3 0 0 8 Poindexter

Statistic Joel Androphy Ross Goldstein Carol Poindexter Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.38 1.25 1.38 Variance 0.27 0.21 0.27 Standard Deviation 0.52 0.46 0.52 Total Responses 8 8 8

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Joel 1 3 3 1 0 7 Androphy Ross 2 4 3 0 0 7 Goldstein Carol 3 3 4 0 0 7 Poindexter

Statistic Joel Androphy Ross Goldstein Carol Poindexter Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 3 2 2 Mean 1.71 1.43 1.57 Variance 0.57 0.29 0.29 Standard Deviation 0.76 0.53 0.53 Total Responses 7 7 7 Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Joel 1 3 3 1 0 7 Androphy Ross 2 3 3 1 0 7 Goldstein Carol 3 3 3 1 0 7 Poindexter

Statistic Joel Androphy Ross Goldstein Carol Poindexter Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 3 3 3 Mean 1.71 1.71 1.71 Variance 0.57 0.57 0.57 Standard Deviation 0.76 0.76 0.76 Total Responses 7 7 7

Diversity Substantive Session

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses C. Ty 1 Reidhead, 1 0 0 0 1 MD

Statistic C. Ty Reidhead, MD Min Value 1 Max Value 1 Mean 1.00 Variance 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 Total Responses 1

Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses C. Ty 1 Reidhead, 0 0 0 0 0 MD Statistic C. Ty Reidhead, MD Min Value - Max Value - Mean 0.00 Variance 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 Total Responses 0

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses C. Ty 1 Reidhead, 0 0 0 0 0 MD

Statistic C. Ty Reidhead, MD Min Value - Max Value - Mean 0.00 Variance 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.00 Total Responses 0

Life Science Companies: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas

Knowledge of Subject Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Michael 1 7 1 0 0 8 E. Clark Robert 2 7 1 0 0 8 Rhoad Robyn 3 7 1 0 0 8 Shapiro

Statistic Michael E. Clark Robert Rhoad Robyn Shapiro Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.13 1.13 1.13 Variance 0.13 0.13 0.13 Standard Deviation 0.35 0.35 0.35 Total Responses 8 8 8 Presentation & Facilitation Skills Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Michael 1 5 2 0 0 7 E. Clark Robert 2 5 2 0 0 7 Rhoad Robyn 3 6 1 0 0 7 Shapiro

Statistic Michael E. Clark Robert Rhoad Robyn Shapiro Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.29 1.29 1.14 Variance 0.24 0.24 0.14 Standard Deviation 0.49 0.49 0.38 Total Responses 7 7 7

Organization & Clarity of Content Strongly Strongly Total # Question Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Responses Michael 1 4 3 0 0 7 E. Clark Robert 2 5 2 0 0 7 Rhoad Robyn 3 5 2 0 0 7 Shapiro

Statistic Michael E. Clark Robert Rhoad Robyn Shapiro Min Value 1 1 1 Max Value 2 2 2 Mean 1.43 1.29 1.29 Variance 0.29 0.24 0.24 Standard Deviation 0.53 0.49 0.49 Total Responses 7 7 7