Facilities and Land Management Committee s1

Agenda Board of Regents Facilities and Land Management Committee Tuesday, May 31, 2011, *2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Room 205 Bragaw Office Building 1815 Bragaw Anchorage, Alaska

Committee Members: Carl Marrs, Committee Chair Mary K. Hughes Robert Martin, Committee Vice Chair Kirk Wickersham Timothy Brady Fuller Cowell, Board Chair

I. Call to Order

II. Adoption of Agenda

MOTION

"The Facilities and Land Management Committee adopts the agenda as presented.

I. Call to Order II. Adoption of Agenda III. Ongoing Issues A. Information Item – University of Alaska Fairbanks Research Vessel Sikuliaq B. Information Item – Academic, Budget and Project Planning Process IV. Full Board Consent Agenda A. Formal Project Approval for the Kenai Peninsula College Student Housing Complex B. Formal Project Approval for the University of Alaska Anchorage Seawolf Sports Arena V. Future Agenda Items VI. Adjourn

This motion is effective May 31, 2011."

III. Ongoing Issues

A. Information Item – University of Alaska Fairbanks Research Vessel Sikuliaq Reference 1

Chancellor Rogers with Dean Castellini, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences; Director Whitledge, Institute of Marine Science and Sikuliaq

Facilities and Land Management Committee Agenda: Page 1 of 16 Agenda Facilities and Land Management Committee May 31, 2011 Anchorage, Alaska

Principle Investigator and Dan Oliver, Sikuliaq Project Director will provide a report on the Alaska Region Research Vessel, the R/V Sikuliaq. Last month’s Keel Laying Ceremony in Marinette, Wisconsin was the most recent event highlighting the reality that the 260 foot research vessel is expected to arrive in Alaska in the Fall of 2013. The recent ceremony was even more significant considering that it has been more than 30 years since the Alaska Region Research Vessel was originally planned and requested.

This report will provide information on the ship’s capabilities and its impact on science, the construction schedule, national level construction and operation oversight structure, expected events upon arrival in Alaska, and the value of the ship’s operation to Alaska. The challenge over the next 18 months is to create a much greater level of awareness and excitement throughout the state for the R/V Sikuliaq. Administration will be seeking advice and involvement from board members in spreading R/V Sikuliaq awareness.

B. Information Item – Academic, Budget and Project Planning Process Reference 2

At the January 2010 board retreat, President Gamble presented “A Methodology for Facility Determination”, a planning process analyzing and documenting need and the ‘all in’ cost for expanding a mission area. This chart, included in the reference material, provides further definition of that process which was embraced by the Board of Regents for integrating academic program, institution budgeting, and facilities project planning processes. President Gamble will present the chart for discussion.

IV. Full Board Consent Agenda

A. Formal Project Approval for the Kenai Peninsula College Student Housing Complex Reference 3

The President recommends that:

MOTION “The Facilities and Land Management Committee recommends that the Board of Regents approve the Formal Project Approval request for the University of Alaska Kenai Peninsula College Student Housing Complex as presented in compliance with the approved campus master plan, and authorizes the university administration to proceed through Schematic Design not to exceed a total project cost of $16,000,000. This motion is effective May 31, 2011.”

POLICY CITATION In accordance with Regents’ Policy 05.12.042, Formal Project Approval (FPA) represents approval of the Project including the program justification and need, scope, the Total Project Cost (TPC), and funding plan for the project. It also represents authorization to complete the development of the project through the schematic design, targeting the approved scope and budget, unless otherwise designated by the approval authority.

An FPA is required for all projects with an estimated TPC in excess of $2.5 million in order for that project’s inclusion of construction funding to be included in the university’s capital budget request, unless otherwise approved by the Board.

The level of approval required shall be based upon TPC as follows:

 TPC > $4 million will require approval by the board based on recommendations from the Facilities and Land Management Committee (F&LMC).  TPC > $2 million but ≤ $4 million will require approval by the F&LMC.  TPC > $1 million but ≤ $2 million will require approval by the Chairperson of the F&LMC.  TPC ≤ $1 million will require approval by the university’s Chief Finance Officer (CFO) or designee.

RATIONALE/RECOMMENDATION

Mission Area Alignment: The project addresses the UA, UAA and KPC strategic and academic plans in a myriad of ways which are summarized below:

. KPC housing would provide much-needed housing in a non-urban setting to address the needs of a variety of students including: o Rural Kenai Peninsula Borough students who live outside commuting distance from Kenai River Campus (KRC). o Kenai Peninsula Borough students living on the central peninsula (18-20 year olds) who would like to leave home, but they either don’t want to live in an apartment or their parents insist they live in a more supervised residential living arrangement.

o Students wanting to pursue their first two years of college and then transfer to another UA campus or outside university. o Non-resident students who move from the lower 48 to pursue KRC high demand degree programs or want to live in Alaska on the Kenai Peninsula.

. The facility will be particularly attractive to native and rural students who face increased challenges when attending large urban campuses. KPC is in a 309-acre rural setting next to the Kenai River, and has a personalized atmosphere with class size averages of 12 students per section.

. KPC offers high demand workforce development programs. Student housing will enable more Alaskans—particularly rural students—the opportunity to pursue these high paying jobs upon graduation. Many of the students will pursue degrees in process technology, industrial process instrumentation, paramedicine, nursing, welding, mechanical technology and electronics. Demand for KPC’s high demand job programs continues to increase and the new Career & Technical Center (KPC CTC) approved by the Board of Regents in February 2011 will handle that growth while student housing would enable more students to attend KPC in a supportive environment thereby increasing retention and graduates. More than $1.4 billion leaves Alaska annually in non-resident salaries; these students will get the jobs that will slow down this disturbing trend. This facility will enable Alaska industries to hire more Alaskans, trained in Alaska.

 Industry and the Alaska Process Industries Careers Consortium (APICC), the statewide advisory council for many high demand career fields have voiced concerns about having sufficient high- demand graduates from underrepresented groups in Alaska, particularly Alaska Native graduates. A British Petroleum (BP) recruiter visiting KPC in early March stated BP is considering “waiving” its long-standing policy of achieving 70% Alaskan hire if they cannot also meet their internal affirmative action hiring goal of 25% or more females and 33% or more racial minorities. Housing will provide additional opportunity for these students, particularly from rural Alaska, to pursue these high demand jobs and help employers meet their recruiting goals.

. KPC offers 16 high demand degree programs. The instrumentation AAS program is offered nowhere else in Alaska. Besides KPC,

the process technology AAS is offered only at KPC’s Anchorage Extension Site or UAF Community and Technical College, which are not necessarily conducive to acculturation by students from small towns and remote villages. With the state-of-the-art KPC CTC soon to be built across the street from housing, paired with our enrollment management focus on Alaska Native and underrepresented groups, this facility will address industry concerns.

. Student housing will allow residential students to engage in public square, local internships, learning communities and community service learning projects, a focus of many KRC faculty. Neighboring Alaska Christian College (ACC) enrolls 45 Native students each semester. ACC and KPC would collaborate on native life programs and these students will likely dine together at the ACC facility as KPC will not be building dining service in the housing facility. KPC has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with ACC that will enable KPC students to utilize the ACC dining facility.

Project Scope: This project would construct an approximately 35,000 gross square foot facility providing space for 90-100 student beds and living space for three resident assistants. The units will consist of four-person apartments with shared kitchen, living room and two students each sharing a bathroom. The facility will have office space for the three resident assistants, a residence housing coordinator and an administrative assistant. Student amenities include two lounges, computer room, laundry room and mailroom.

The commons area will provide a multipurpose room, fitness room, and seating for 100 where various student activities can be held. Dining service will not be available, but the commons would include a food preparation and serving area that would be used to support special events and summer conferences. As stated earlier, KPC and ACC signed a MOU that opens the opportunity for KRC students to utilize the ACC dining facility.

Programmatic Need Addressed by the Project The number of high demand job graduates from KPC has increased 315% (26 to 108) since 2000. Building student housing will open these fields to students that are reluctant to attend a large university whether in Alaska or the lower 48.

These students will now have a choice to attend a rural college where they can pursue a 2-year degree or one of the four UAA 4-year degrees (Liberal Studies, Elementary Education, Psychology and Art) that are available at the campus. For those students that desire to pursue a different 4-year degree at one of the MAUs, they will be prepared to make this transition after spending their first two years at KRC where they can receive the developmental and 100/200 level courses in a supportive, caring environment with low student/faculty ratios.

Since its establishment more than 46 years ago, KPC has believed student housing was needed in order to serve students in its 25,000+ square mile service area (size of Massachusetts and New Jersey combined).

In the 1984 UA Red Book, $5.187.5 million ($11,058,593 in 2010 dollars) in funding for KPC housing was approved by the Board of Regents for the 1987-1990 Capital Projects Plan. The following year, it was moved to the 1988-1991 Capital Program with $100,000 for a housing feasibility study and $1 million for site preparation. The Red Book stated, “…a minimum of 200 students will require housing prior to fall, 1986…Housing is requested for a minimum of 100 students prior to fall, 1988.”

With the 1987 merger, these capital plans were dissolved and housing at KPC in the eyes of the university was put on the back burner. KPC now comes back to the Board of Regents 27 years later requesting the same after the passage of Proposition B in November 2010.

The UAA administration believes that students both inside and outside commuting distance may not be attending KPC due to the lack of student housing. The cost of commuting continues to rise with gas prices presently at $4.42/gallon and climbing.

To further demonstrate the demand and need for housing, KPC has staffed tables at the Alaska Native Professionals Conference Career Fairs, Anchorage College and Career Fair and the Fairbanks College Fairs. Many individuals show interest in KPC’s unique programs (process technology, paramedic and nursing in particular). However, their unanimous concern was, “If you don’t have housing, it is unlikely our students can attend your college since they are not ready to live on their own in apartments.”

Despite this, KPC’s Alaska Native/American Indian enrollments continue to grow, increasing 337% from 51 in 1999 to 223 in Spring 20111. For those students that were enrolled in a KPC degree program, this 1 UA Spring 2011 Opening Enrollment Summary (2/14/11), Statewide Planning and Institutional Research, p. 10.

population constituted 6% (18) of the student body in Fall 2000, increasing to 8% (58) in Fall 20102. Much of the disparity between the degree seeking vs. non-degree seeking students is attributed to those students that don’t register for a degree program sometimes until their third or fourth semester even though they are actually taking courses toward a degree. KPC enrolls more AK Native/American Indian, Pacific Island, Asian, Black and Hispanic students than any other UAA community campus.

Support for housing in the community is evident as the Kenai Peninsula Borough, for the previous four years, requested $10 million for KPC housing in its annual capital priority list sent to the Alaska Legislature.

The McDowell Group performed a Kenai Peninsula College Student Housing Potential Market Demand Study (attached) in Spring 2008 that demonstrates a strong need and demand for such housing at the campus. “...housing helps to ease the transition to college, and in the case of rural community colleges, student housing opens up the opportunity for prospective students who are not willing to leave rural Alaska to attend college.”

Highlights from the McDowell Group KPC Housing Study The McDowell study estimates that initial demand for KPC student housing would range from 75 to150 full-time students with a mid-point of approximately 110 students. In addition, only those households that said they were “very interested” were used in the estimates. While those that stated “somewhat likely” and “somewhat interested” were not used in the estimates, there is the likelihood that additional demand would come from these households. When combined, the total estimated potential demand from the rural areas and the selected Kenai Peninsula Borough communities is approximately 127 students.

There are additional factors that will increase KPC student housing demand beyond the above estimates including the economic downturn since the study was done two years ago. Many more Alaskan students are electing to stay in Alaska as evidenced by KPC and UA enrollment growth during this period.

Of those rural community colleges with on campus housing in the U.S., 80 percent indicated that on-campus housing was filled to capacity, and 32 percent indicated that they have waiting lists (Moeck, 2005).

2 Banner data pull according to Wendy Redman.

Housing at community colleges across the U.S. is becoming a rapidly growing trend with about 254 public 2-year colleges and 62 independent colleges now having on-campus housing3. Of the community colleges that offered on-campus housing in 2006, about 90 percent were in rural settings4. Eighty percent are filled to capacity and 32% have waiting lists.

As one housing survey interviewee said, “Many rural students are unlikely to pursue post-secondary education at an urban campus. With the availability of on-campus student housing as rural colleges, more options would be open to rural students.”

Based on the findings of the McDowell Study and the assumption by UA Statewide that the number of urban high school graduates will decline and rural high school graduates will increase over the next five years, building student housing at KPC should be considered a strategy for the university to increase the number of rural Alaskans attending UA.

Housing Availability and Costs in Local Area On December 21, 2010, a search for 1-bedroom apartments on the central Kenai Peninsula was conducted using the Alaska Housing Locator sponsored by the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation. Approximately 12 units were available ranging in price from a monthly low of $600 to a high of $1,050. Average price was $780. Most rentals included gas, electric and water. The AK Department of Labor reported that the vacancy rate for 1- bedroom apartments in 2009 in the Soldotna area was 7.7%

KRC student housing units are projected to cost $2,887 per semester. Students renting apartments typically must sign 1-year contracts. For each semester in a privately owned apartment, students would actually pay five months rent to equal one semester. Ten months of rent (August to May) at $780=$7,800 vs. $5,774 for KRC housing/two semesters results in a $2,026 savings to students for one academic year. Students pursuing a 2- year degree will save more than $4,000 in housing costs during their time spent living on campus.

The housing complex will have cable TV ready rooms with high speed internet service in each room and included in the student fees. Students living in off-campus housing would pay about $40 monthly for the internet service resulting in an additional $400 cost over 10 months.

3 American Association of Community Colleges web site, “AACC Fast Facts,” http://www.aacc.nche.edu/AboutCC/Pages/fastfacts.aspx 4 “Rural Community Colleges Are the Land-Grant Institutions of This Century,” by Stephen G. Katsinas, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 26, 2007, http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i09/09b02601.htm?ccn

Students living in housing will save gas and auto maintenance repair money that they would have spent to commute to the campus. A student commuting 30 miles round trip four days a week = 120 miles X 16 week semester = 1,920 miles. If the student’s car gets 15 mpg, she would use 128 gallons of gas. Gas presently costs $4.42/gallon X 128 = $566 X 2 semesters = $1,132.

Adding in the additional costs for a commuter, students will save $3,558 each annually. Students pursuing a 2-year degree will save more than $7,000 in housing costs during their time spent living on campus.

KPC as Transition Campus UA community campuses are being viewed differently than they have in the past. Some consider them as “feeder campuses” to the MAUs and not necessarily stand-alone 2-year degree and certificate granting community colleges, offering a limited number of upper division courses and MAU degree programs. This change is present not just in Alaska but across the United States.

UA has matured to the point where it should operate similar to other U.S. university systems by using community campuses to provide the first two years of GERs and then students can matriculate to the universities if the community campus doesn’t offer the MAU 4-year degree at the campus (KPC students can pursue four UAA 4-year degrees at the campus). Examples include Penn State, University of Maine and the University of Maryland. UA community campuses continue to offer more high-demand job programs such as nursing, allied health and process technology where rural students in a region must sometimes drive more than 70 miles in winter driving conditions to take these courses. Those living off the road system don’t even have that option. Student housing will alleviate this.

Variance Report None

Proposed Total Project Cost and Funding Source(s) FY 11 GO Bond $16,000,000

Estimated Annual Maintenance and Operating Costs (O&M) Maintenance and Repair $240,000/year Facility Operating Costs $159,259/year

All operational costs, including maintenance and repair will be covered by student housing fees, summer conferences and courses, and training workshops. Full time students (12 credits or more) will occupy the 90-100 bed complex.

Consultant(s) TBD

Other Cost Considerations See Financial Proforma

Backfill Plan None

Schedule for Completion DESIGN Conceptual Design June 2010 Preliminary Administrative Approval March 2011 Formal Project Approval June 2011 Schematic Design September 2011 Schematic Design Approval September 2011

Construction Documents April 2012

BID & AWARD Advertise and Bid May 2012 Construction Contract Award June 2012

CONSTRUCTION Start of Construction June 2012 Date of Beneficial Occupancy August 2013 Procurement Method for Construction Design-Bid-Build

Affirmation This project complies with Regents’ Policy, the approved campus master plan, and the project agreement.

Action Requested Approval to develop the project documents through schematic design.

Supporting Documents Proposed Project Budget Financial proforma

B. Formal Project Approval for the University of Alaska Anchorage Seawolf Sports Arena Reference 4

The President recommends that:

MOTION “The Facilities and Land Management Committee recommends that the Board of Regents approve the amendment to the Formal Project Approval request for the University of Alaska Anchorage Seawolf Sports Arena as presented in compliance with the approved campus master plan, and authorizes the university administration to proceed with development of a 5,600 seat arena project through Schematic Design not to exceed a total project cost of $109,000,000. This motion is effective May 31, 2011.”

POLICY CITATION In accordance with Regents’ Policy 05.12.042, Formal Project Approval (FPA) represents approval of the Project including the program justification and need, scope, the Total Project Cost (TPC), and funding plan for the project. It also represents authorization to complete the development of the project through the schematic design, targeting the approved scope and budget, unless otherwise designated by the approval authority.

An FPA is required for all projects with an estimated TPC in excess of $2.5 million in order for that project’s inclusion of construction funding to be included in the university’s capital budget request, unless otherwise approved by the Board.

The level of approval required shall be based upon TPC as follows:

 TPC > $4 million will require approval by the board based on recommendations from the Facilities and Land Management Committee (F&LMC).  TPC > $2 million but ≤ $4 million will require approval by the F&LMC.  TPC > $1 million but ≤ $2 million will require approval by the Chairperson of the F&LMC.  TPC ≤ $1 million will require approval by the university’s Chief Finance Officer (CFO) or designee.

RATIONALE/RECOMMENDATION One of UAA’s Strategic Plan priorities is to build and strengthen the UAA community as a whole in order to make the best of the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead. UAA must build an institution distinguished as a diverse, engaged community of students, staff, faculty, alumni, schools, colleges, and campuses. Building strong wellness, exercise, recreation, and intramural/intercollegiate athletics programs and facilities to serve students, faculty, staff, and communities is an important part of this plan. These programs and facilities contribute significantly to student life, recruitment and retention of students and faculty.

Currently, the only space on the UAA main campus for athletic, recreation, intramural, intercollegiate, and physical education is the Wells Fargo Sports Complex (WFSC). WFSC opened in 1978 as a recreational facility for a community college with no college athletics or physical education academic program. At that time, there was also no on-campus housing. This facility consists of one basketball court, a pool, a practice hockey rink and a small weight training area created from converted racquetball courts. Locker room space and administrative offices are very limited.

In February 2004, a McCool Carlson Green study documented the WFSC severe space shortage and major deferred maintenance issues. To address most of these deficiencies, the 2004 UAA Master Plan (see more detail below) was amended and approved by the Board of Regents on February 24, 2009 to site a new sports arena north of university housing. Since 2004, the documented space shortage and deferred maintenance issues have gotten much worse. Code upgrades, mechanical and electrical system work, fire system replacement and natatorium, ice rink and supporting equipment upgrades are part of the renovation portion of a $46M renovation and expansion project programmed for completion after the new sports arena is operable. The growth in athletics, Health, Physical Education and Recreation (HPER) academics, and student/community usage has been tremendous.

Today there are 15,000 commuter students, 1,000 on-campus student residents, 300 HPER academic program students, 11 Division I and Division II athletic teams, 168 men and women student-athletes, seven head coaches, 14 assistant coaches, 19 other athletic staff personnel, and thousands of community members trying to share this space. This small facility is used every available hour of every day. It can handle up to 2,000 customers a week and would easily attract another 2,500-3,000 customers a week if it had the space. Athletic events are limited by the small 950-person gym, as well as the difficult parking environment and

on-going classes held in the busiest section of the campus. Due to the inadequacies of this facility, some athletic teams must rent space in other venues to practice and play games. Leasing space in other venues is not only an economic drain, but the time involved in travel to-and-from, has a negative impact on the student athletes and faculty involved. Storage space is also severely lacking. Gymnastics equipment, for example, must be stored in an unheated outdoor container, and transported to the sports complex prior to every home meet.

Additionally, this arena will give UAA the opportunity to get maximum engagement from and give back to the Anchorage community. A strongly engaged community will become a strongly supporting community. This signature building will act as a beacon to local community members and provide Anchorage and the Southcentral Alaska region with the mid-sized fixed-seat venue that is missing in the municipality. It will allow UAA, for the first time, to hold its graduation ceremonies on campus as well as other local school graduation events. These local school graduation ceremonies can provide a very positive and inviting introduction to all that UAA has to offer to high school graduates still considering their options. Likewise, large summer conferencing and athletic camp events will find a home in this facility. Additionally, it will give UAA the option to hold large community sporting events such as the Carrs/Safeway Great Alaska Shootout, student and community mid-sized concerts, lectures and activities too big for the current UAA facilities, but not sized for larger community venues.

The construction of the arena will significantly reduce the current pressure on the WFSC by moving all of the athletic teams (with the exception of the hockey team) to the new facility, and will increase the intramural and recreational opportunities for UAA students. This will allow the WFSC to be renovated and expanded to become a Western Collegiate Hockey Association-quality, hockey practice site and the primary recreational, wellness and physical education facility for students, staff, and community members.

Project Scope The approved project scope included in the original Formal Project Approval, approved by the Board of Regents in February 2009 envisioned a 130,000 gsf, 3,500 seat arena. Further project analysis during design development has established a requirement for a 196,000 gsf, 5,600 seat arena. The larger building, sized for the next 50 years of growth in Southcentral Alaska, will house a 5,600 seat capacity performance gymnasium for basketball, volleyball, graduations, and university/ community concerts/events; a practice and performance gym for the gymnastics program; multiple court auxiliary gym for recreation,

intramurals, dances, and concerts; support space consisting of a fitness and training room, administration and coaches offices, laundry facilities, A/V production and locker and team rooms for basketball, volleyball, gymnastics, skiing, track and cross country programs. The project will include approximately 1,000 surface parking spaces. Through the use of existing UAA parking and a partnership with Providence Alaska Medical Center, adequate parking spaces will be available within a 6-minute walk, for major spectator events. Additional parking is available nearby as well as shuttle capability from adjacent university parking. UAA’s transportation consultant, Kittelson & Associates, is confident there is adequate parking and, if recommendations for traffic flow are implemented, there will be minimal event traffic problems. The construction of Health Drive between Wellness and Elmore will ultimately improve traffic flow at surrounding intersections even with a 5,600 seat arena.

This arena project does not include an on-campus performance ice rink component. The on-campus practice rink in WFSC will be replaced and upgraded to a state-of-the art practice facility as part of the WFSC renovation. UAA, as the anchor tenant of the city-owned Sullivan Arena, is actively supporting a municipality initiative to upgrade the Sullivan Arena—including improved parking, locker rooms, media and sponsor suites.

Variance Report The original Formal Project Approval, approved by the Board in February 2009 was based upon a 130,000 gsf, 3,500 seat arena with a total project cost of $80,000,000. The current project scope includes a 196,000 gsf, 5,600 seat arena having a total project cost of $109,000,000.

Proposed Total Project Cost and Funding Source(s) FY09 Capital Appropriation $15,000,000 FY11 GO Bond $60,000,000 (funding anticipated in FY12 capital budget) $34,000,000 Total Project Cost $109,000,000

Proposed O&M Cost Impact The cost of maintenance, building operations, and utilities is estimated to be $1,965,000. It is anticipated that these facility fixed costs will be included in the annual state funded operating budget. If the State does not fund these costs as an increment to UA’s fixed costs, UAA will reallocate existing operational funds to cover them.

Consultant(s) McCool, Carlson, Green Hasting & Chivetta

Other Cost Considerations There are no additional cost considerations under review at this time. Additional staff required to operate the arena will be funded by UAA. Future phases will be required to make the spine connection from the facility across the Providence to UAA Main Library Plaza. The site can also support some expansion for parking, sports fields or a possible field house.

Backfill Plan WFSC backfill requirements are included in UAA Project 07-0046, Student Recreation/ WFSC Renovation.

Schedule for Completion DESIGN Conceptual Design Complete Formal Project Approval February2009 Schematic Design June 2009 Limited Schematic Design Approval June 2009 UAA Presentation to FLMC Working Group March 2010 Voters approve $60M in GO Bond November 2010 Authorization to update Schematic Design February 2011 Schematic Design Approval* June 2011 Site Preparation Approval June 2011 Design Development June 2011 to November 2011 Construction Documents December 2011 to April 2012

CONTRACTOR SELECTION (CMAR) Advertise and Bid March 2011 Selection Construction Contractor May 2011

CONSTRUCTION Site Preparation September 2011 Start of Construction May 2012 Substantial Completion May 2014 Beneficial Occupancy June 2014 *The construction schedule will be updated at Schematic Design Approval (expected June 2011).

Procurement Method for Construction Construction Manager at Risk

Affirmation This project complies with Board Policy, the campus master plan, and the project agreement.

Action Requested Amend original FPA to increase from 3,500 to 5,600 seat arena.

Supporting Documents Project Budget

V. Future Agenda Items

VI. Adjourn

Facilities and Land Management Committee Agenda: Page 16 of 16