Your Name First-Middle:Last

1. 2. 3.

4. Your Name First-Middle:Last Your PO Box Address 5. City and State

6. Attn: ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 7. 8. NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO ALL AGENTS, NOTICE TO THE AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE. 9.

10. ) ) 11. ) DECLARATION & LEGAL NOTICE: ) 12. ) RIGHT TO TRAVEL ) 13. I, (Your Name)First-Middle:Last A (Wo)man, a traveler (NOT 14. A DRIVER), and one of the people Claim AND State: 15. RIGHT TO TRAVEL 16. The right to travel freely in this country, is a 17. constitutional right, and an inalienable right. Traveling is not 18. a crime unless, a physical human being is threatened, injured, or their property is threatened or injured, and you can produce 19. the body of the victim and cause them to appear in court. THE 20. STATE and THE UNITED STATES can not be an injured party. For 21. example if someone is traveling who is intoxicated, on a public 22. highway or street with other travelers, they are threatening 23. everyone else on the road, and may injure them or their 24. property. Only Corporations, and Government (persons) are required to have driver's licenses, and persons (Drivers) are 25. defined as: “labor organization”, “employment agency”, 26. “commerce”, “industry affecting commerce”, corporation, business 27. trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, governmental

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 1 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or 3. any other legal or commercial entity by {USC § 12111 (7) & UCC § 4. 1-201 (27)}. 5. People who are in control of a vehicle while traveling for 6. personal reasons are travelers. 7. “The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental 8. right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be 9. deprived." {Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.} 10. "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and 11. to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by 12. automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the 13. right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." {Thompson 14. v. Smith, 154 SE 579.} 15. "The right to travel is a well-established common right that 16. does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is 17. recognized by the courts as a natural right." {Schactman v. 18. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.} “The right of the citizen to travel upon the highway and to 19. transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life 20. and business, differs radically and obviously from that of one 21. who makes the highway his place of business for private gain in 22. the running of a stagecoach or omnibus.” {STATE VS SPOKANE} 23. "The state cannot diminish rights of the people." 24. {Hertado v. California, 110 US 516,} "Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of 25. common right and common reason are null and void." 26. {Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60,} 27. "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 2 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. practice." {Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24} 3. "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there 4. can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate 5. them." {Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.} 6. "The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." {Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489.} 7. “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because 8. of this exercise of constitutional rights." {Sherer v. 9. Cullen, 481 F 946} 10. TRAVELER. One who passes from place to place, whether for 11. pleasure, instruction, business or health. {Lockett v. 12. State, 47 Ala. 45; 10 C.B.N.S. 429.} TRAVEL. To go from one place to another at a distance; to 13. journey; spoken of voluntary change of place. {White v. 14. Beazley, 1 Barn. & Ald. 171; Hancock v. Rand, 94 N.Y. 1, 46 15. Am.Rep. 112; State v. Smith, 157 Ind. 241, 61 N.E. 566, 87 16. Am. St.Rep. 205.} 17. DRIVER. One employed in conducting or operating a coach, 18. carriage, wagon, or other vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor car, though 19. not a street railroad car. A person actually doing driving, 20. whether employed by owner to drive or driving his own 21. vehicle. {Wallace v. Woods, 340 Mo. 452, 102 S.W.2d 91, 97.} 22. GANG. Any company of persons who go about together or act in 23. concert, in modern use mainly for criminal purposes. {State 24. v. Gaynor, 119 N.J.L. 582, 197 A. 360, 362.} {TRAVEL, GANG, DRIVER, & TRAVELER above are found in the Black's Law 25. Dictionary 4th Edition, ruled by the US SUPREME COURT to be 26. the 2nd Highest authority in these United States} 27.

The following comes from: [Shapiro v. Thompson 394 U.S. 618

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 3 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. (1969)] 3.

4. "This Court long ago recognized that the nature of our 5. Federal Union and our constitutional concepts of personal 6. liberty unite to require that all citizens be free to travel throughout the length and breadth of our land uninhibited by 7. statutes, rules, or regulations which unreasonably burden or 8. restrict this movement. That" [Page 394 U. S. 630 9. ] 10. "The constitutional right to travel from one State to 11. another . . . occupies a position fundamental to the concept 12. of our Federal Union. It is a right that has been firmly established and repeatedly recognized." [Page 394 U. S. 631 13. ] 14. "that a right so elementary was conceived from the 15. beginning to be a necessary concomitant of the stronger Union 16. the Constitution created. In any event, freedom to travel 17. throughout the United States has long been recognized as a 18. basic right under the Constitution." Page 394 U. S. 632 19. "where the freedom of Americans to travel outside the 20. country was grounded upon the Due Process Clause of the Fifth 21. Amendment." [Footnote 9] 22. 23. "We imply no view of the validity of waiting period or 24. residence requirements determining eligibility to vote, eligibility for tuition-free education, to obtain a license 25. to practice a profession, to hunt or fish, and so forth. Such 26. requirements may promote compelling state interests on the 27. one hand, or, on the other, may not be penalties upon the exercise of the constitutional right of interstate travel."

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 4 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. [Footnote 22] 3.

4. "The constitutional right to travel from one State to 5. another . . . has been firmly established and repeatedly 6. recognized." United States v. Guest, 383 U. S. 745, 383 U. S. 757. This constitutional right, which, of course, includes 7. the right of "entering and abiding in any State in the 8. Union," Truax v. Raich, 239 U. S. 33, 239 U. S. 39, is not a 9. mere conditional liberty subject to regulation and control 10. under conventional[Page 394 U. S. 643] 11. 12. "[T]he right to travel freely from State to State finds constitutional protection that is quite independent of the 13. Fourteenth Amendment." [Page 394 U. S. 644] 14. 15. "The constitutional right of interstate travel was fully 16. recognized long before adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. 17. See the statement of Chief Justice Taney in the Passenger 18. Cases, 7 How. 283, 48 U. S. 492:" [Footnote 2/3] 19. "The extent of emergency governmental power temporarily 20. to prevent or control interstate travel, e.g., to a disaster 21. area, need not be considered in these cases." [Footnote 2/5 22. Page 394 U. S. 645] 23. 24. "As already noted, travel itself is not prohibited..." [Footnote 3/5 Page 394 U. S. 651] 25. 26. "Congress enacted the welfare residence requirement in 27. the District of Columbia, so the right to travel which is invoked in that case must be enforceable against

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 5 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. congressional action. The residence requirements challenged 3. in the Pennsylvania and Connecticut appeals were authorized 4. by Congress in 42 U.S.C. § 602(b), so the right to travel 5. relied upon in those cases must be enforceable against the 6. States even though they have acted with congressional approval." [Page 394 U. S. 664] 7. 8. "Opinions of this Court and of individual Justices have 9. suggested four provisions of the Constitution as possible 10. sources of a right to travel enforceable against the federal 11. or state governments: the Commerce Clause; [Footnote 4/20] 12. the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Art. IV, § 2; [Footnote 4/21] the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the 13. Fourteenth Amendment; [Footnote 4/22] and the Due Process 14. Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [Footnote 4/23] "[Page 394 U. 15. S. 667] 16. 17. "those privileges and immunities have repeatedly been 18. said to include the right to travel from State to State, [Footnote 4/27]" [Page 394 U. S. 668] 19. 20. "that freedom to travel is an element of the "liberty" 21. secured by that clause. In Kent v. Dulles, 357 U. S. 116, 22. 357 U. S. 125-126 (1958), the Court said:"The right to travel 23. is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be 24. deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. . . . Freedom of movement across frontiers . . . 25. and inside frontiers as well, was a part of our heritage. . . 26. ." The Court echoed these remarks in Aptheker v. Secretary 27. of State, 378 U. S. 500, 378 U. S. 505-506 (1964)," [Page 394 U. S. 671]

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 6 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. 3. "interstate travel. Without specifying the source of 4. that right, the Court said: "The constitutional right to 5. travel from one State to another . . . occupies a position 6. fundamental to the concept of our Federal Union. It is a right that has been firmly established and repeatedly 7. recognized. . . . [The] right finds no explicit mention in 8. the Constitution. The reason, it has been suggested, is that 9. a right so elementary was conceived from the beginning to be 10. a necessary concomitant of the stronger Union the 11. Constitution created. In any event, freedom to travel 12. throughout the United States has long been recognized as a basic right under the Constitution." Id. at 383 U. S. 757- 13. 758. (Footnotes omitted.) I therefore conclude that the right 14. to travel interstate is a "fundamental" right which, for 15. present purposes, should be regarded as having its source in 16. the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment." [Page 394 U. 17. S. 672] 18. "has acknowledged that the right to travel interstate is 19. a "fundamental" freedom. Second, it is contended that the 20. governmental objectives mentioned above either are ephemeral 21. or could be accomplished by means which do not impinge as 22. heavily on the right to travel, and hence that the 23. requirements are unconstitutional because they "sweep 24. unnecessarily broadly and thereby invade the area of protected freedoms." NAACP v. Alabama, 377 U. S. 288, 377 U. 25. S. 307 (1964)." [Page 394 U. S. 676] 26.

27. "The Crandall Court stressed the "right" of a citizen to come to the national capital, to have access to federal

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 7 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. officials, and to travel to seaports. See 6 Wall. at 73 U. S. 3. 44." [Footnote 4/29] "Professor Chafee has suggested that the 4. Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment may similarly 5. protect the right to travel against state interference. See 6. Z. Chafee, Three Human Rights in the Constitution of 1787, p. 192 (1956)." [Footnote 4/30] [Cf. Harper v. Virginia Bd. of 7. Elections, 383 U. S. 663, 383 U. S. 670, 383 U. S. 675-680 8. (BLACK, J., dissenting).] [The above said material comes 9. from Shapiro v. Thompson 394 U.S. 618 (1969)] 10. 11. Justice Tolman of the Supreme Court of the State of 12. Washington stated: "Complete freedom of the highways is so old and well established a blessing that we have forgotten 13. the days of the Robber Barons and toll roads, and yet, under 14. an act like this, arbitrarily administered, the highways may 15. be completely monopolized, if, through lack of interest, the 16. people submit, then they may look to see the most sacred of 17. their liberties taken from them one by one, by more or less 18. rapid encroachment." [Robertson vs. Department of Public Works, 180 Wash 133, 147.] 19. 20. "The right to travel is part of the Liberty of which a 21. citizen cannot deprived without due process of law under the 22. Fifth Amendment. This Right was emerging as early as the 23. Magna Carta." [Kent vs. Dulles, 357 US 116 (1958)] 24. "Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of locomotion 25. -- to go where and when one pleases -- only so far restrained 26. as the Rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare 27. of all other citizens. The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 8 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is 3. not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at 4. will, but the common Right which he has under his Right to 5. life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this 6. Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public 7. highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in 8. an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor 9. disturbing another's Rights, he will be protected, not only 10. in his person, but in his safe conduct." [II Am.Jur. (1st) 11. Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135] 12. "Personal liberty -- consists of the power of locomotion, of 13. changing situations, of removing one's person to whatever 14. place one's inclination may direct, without imprisonment or 15. restraint unless by due process of law." 16. 17. [ Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914 ed., Black's Law Dictionary, 18. 5th ed.; Blackstone's Commentary 134; Hare, Constitution, Pg. 777 ] 19. 20. You can not be required to have a Driver's License "...We are 21. of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this 22. particular between an individual and a corporation, and that 23. the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for examination on the suit of the State. The 24. individual may stand upon his Constitutional Rights as a 25. Citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in 26. his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no 27. duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to investigation, so far as it

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 9 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. may tend to incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the 3. State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the 4. protection of his life, liberty, and property. His Rights are 5. such as the law of the land long antecedent to the 6. organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. 7. Among his Rights are the refusal to incriminate himself, and 8. the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or 9. seizure except under warrant of law. He owes nothing to the 10. public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." 11. 12. "Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the state. It is presumed to be incorporated for the benefit of 13. the public. It receives certain special privileges and 14. franchises, and holds them subject to the laws of the state 15. and the limitations of its charter. Its rights to act as a 16. corporation are only preserved to it so long as it obeys the 17. laws of its creation. There is a reserved right in the 18. legislature to investigate its contracts and find out whether it has exceeded its powers. It would be a strange anomaly to 19. hold that the State, having chartered a corporation to make 20. use of certain franchises, could not in exercise of its 21. sovereignty inquire how those franchises had been employed, 22. and whether they had been abused, and demand the production 23. of corporate books and papers for that purpose." [Hale vs. Hinkel, 201 US 43, 74-75] 24. 25. "...Based upon the fundamental ground that the sovereign 26. state has the plenary control of the streets and highways in 27. the exercise of its police power (see police power, infra.), may absolutely prohibit the use of the streets as a place for

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 10 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. the prosecution of a private business for gain. They all 3. recognize the fundamental distinction between the ordinary 4. Right of the Citizen to use the streets in the usual way and 5. the use of the streets as a place of business or a main 6. instrumentality of business for private gain. The former is a common Right, the latter is an extraordinary use. As to the 7. former, the legislative power is confined to regulation, as 8. to the latter, it is plenary and extends even to absolute 9. prohibition. Since the use of the streets by a common carrier 10. in the prosecution of its business as such is not a right but 11. a mere license of privilege." [Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 12. 516] 13. "Personal liberty -- or the right to enjoyment of life and 14. liberty -- is one of the fundamental or natural rights, which 15. has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the 16. various constitutions, which is not derived from nor 17. dependent on the U.S. Constitution. ... It is one of the most 18. sacred and valuable rights [remember the words of Justice Tolman, supra.] as sacred as the right to private 19. property ... and is regarded as inalienable." [16 C.J.S. 20. Const. Law, Sect.202, Pg. 987] 21.

22. "The term `travel' and `traveler' are usually construed in 23. their broad and general sense ... so as to include all those who rightfully use the highways viatically (when being 24. reimbursed for expenses) and who have occasion to pass over 25. them for the purpose of business, convenience, or pleasure." 26. [25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways, Sect.427, Pg. 717] 27.

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 11 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. 3. OPERATOR: Today we assume that a "traveler" is a "driver," 4. and a "driver" is an "operator." However, this is not the 5. case. 6. "It will be observed from the language of the ordinance that a distinction is to be drawn between the terms `operator' and 7. `driver'; the `operator' of the service car being the person 8. who is licensed to have the car on the streets in the 9. business of carrying passengers for hire; while the `driver' 10. is the one who actually drives the car. However, in the 11. actual prosecution of business, it was possible for the same 12. person to be both "operator" and "driver." 13. [Newbill vs. Union Indemnity Co., 60 SE.2d 658] 14. 15. 16. 17. Travelors are exempt from paying for the wear or use of the 18. roads: "... Traffic thereon is to some extent destructive, therefore, the prevention of unnecessary duplication of auto 19. transportation service will lengthen the life of the highways 20. or reduce the cost of maintenance, the revenue derived by the 21. state ... will also tend toward the public welfare by 22. producing at the expense of those operating for private gain, 23. some small part of the cost of repairing the wear …" [ Northern Pacific R.R. Co. vs. Schoenfeldt, 213 P. 26 ] 24. 25. 26.

27. "The word `traffic' is manifestly used here in secondary sense, and has reference to the business of transportation

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 12 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. rather than to its primary meaning of interchange of 3. commodities." 4. [ Allen vs. City of Bellingham, 163 P. 18 ] 5. 6. 7. LICENSE: "The permission, by competent authority to do an act 8. which without permission, would be illegal, a trespass, or a 9. tort." [People vs. Henderson, 218 NW.2d 2, 4] 10. 11. LICENSE: "Leave to do a thing which licensor could prevent." 12. [Western Electric Co. vs. Pacent Reproducer Corp., 42 F.2d 116, 118] 13. 14. LICENSE: "a permit, granted by an appropriate governmental 15. body, generally for consideration, to a person, firm, or 16. corporation, to pursue some occupation or to carry on some 17. business which is subject to regulation under the police 18. power." [Rosenblatt vs. California State Board of Pharmacy, 158 P.2d 199, 203] 19. 20. 21.

22. POLICE POWER: 23. Each law relating to the use of police power must ask three questions: 24. 25. 1. "Is there threatened danger? 26.

27. 2. Does a regulation involve a Constitutional Right?

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 13 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. 3. Is this regulation reasonable?" 3.

4. [People vs. Smith, 108 Am.St.Rep. 715;] [Bovier's Law 5. Dictionary, 1914 ed., under "Police Power"] 6. "The automobile is not inherently dangerous." [Cohens vs. 7. Meadow, 89 SE 876;] [Blair vs. Broadmore, 93 SE 532] 8. 9. "With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is 10. elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document 11. cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police 12. authority."[Connolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 540;] [Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. Co., 24 A. 848;] [O'Neil vs. 13. Providence Amusement Co., 108 A. 887] 14.

15. "The police power of the state must be exercised in 16. subordination to the provisions of the U.S. 17. Constitution."[Bacahanan vs. Wanley, 245 US 60;] [Panhandle 18. Eastern Pipeline Co. vs. State Highway Commission, 294 US 613] 19. 20. "It is well settled that the Constitutional Rights protected 21. from invasion by the police power, include Rights safeguarded 22. both by express and implied prohibitions in the 23. Constitutions." [Tiche vs. Osborne, 131 A. 60] 24. "As a rule, fundamental limitations of regulations under the 25. police power are found in the spirit of the Constitutions, 26. not in the letter, although they are just as efficient as if 27. expressed in the clearest language." [Mehlos vs. Milwaukee, 146 NW 882]

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 14 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. 3. 4.

5. DUE PROCESS: 6. "The essential elements of due process of law are ... Notice 7. and The Opportunity to defend." [Simon vs. Craft, 182 US 427] 8. 9. "There should be no arbitrary deprivation of Life or 10. Liberty ..." [Barbour vs. Connolly, 113 US 27, 31;] [Yick Wo 11. vs. Hopkins, 118 US 356] 12. "a law which hears before it condemns, which proceeds upon 13. inquiry, and renders judgment only after trial." [Daniel 14. Webster in his Dartmouth College Case (4 Wheat 518)] See also 15. [State vs. Strasburg, 110 P. 1020; ] [Dennis vs. Moses, 52 16. P. 333] 17. 18. "no one shall be personally bound (restricted) until he has had his day in court," 19. by which is meant, until he has been duly cited to appear 20. and has been afforded an opportunity to be heard. Judgment 21. without such citation and opportunity lacks all the 22. attributes of a judicial determination; it is judicial 23. usurpation and it is oppressive and can never be upheld where it is fairly administered. [12 Am.Jur. [1st] Const. Law, 24. Sect. 573, Pg. 269] 25. 26. 27. REGULATION

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 15 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. 3. "In addition to the requirement that regulations governing 4. the use of the highways must not be violative of 5. constitutional guarantees, the prime essentials of such 6. regulation are reasonableness, impartiality, and definiteness or certainty." [25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways, Sect. 260] 7. 8. "Moreover, a distinction must be observed between the 9. regulation of an activity which may be engaged in as a matter 10. of right and one carried on by government sufferance of 11. permission." [Davis vs. Massachusetts, 167 US 43;] [Pachard 12. vs. Banton, supra.] 13. 14.

15. SURRENDER OF RIGHTS 16. 17. "... the only limitations found restricting the right of the 18. state to condition the use of the public highways as a means of vehicular transportation for compensation are (1) that the 19. state must not exact of those it permits to use the highways 20. for hauling for gain that they surrender any of their 21. inherent U.S. Constitutional Rights as a condition precedent 22. to obtaining permission for such use ..." [Riley vs. Laeson, 23. 142 So. 619;] [Stephenson vs. Binford, supra.] 24. If one cannot be placed in a position of being forced to 25. surrender Rights in order to exercise a privilege, how much 26. more must this maxim of law, then, apply when one is simply 27. exercising (putting into use) a Right? [Hoke vs. Henderson, 15 NC 15]

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 16 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. 3. "We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should 4. have to be surrendered in order to assert another." [Simons 5. vs. United States, 390 US 389] 6. 7. 8. TAXING POWER 9.

10. "Any claim that this statute is a taxing statute would be 11. immediately open to severe Constitutional objections. If it 12. could be said that the state had the power to tax a Right, this would enable the state to destroy Rights guaranteed by 13. the constitution through the use of oppressive taxation. The 14. question herein, is one of the state taxing the Right to 15. travel by the ordinary modes of the day, and whether this is 16. a legislative object of the state taxation. The views 17. advanced herein are neither novel nor unsupported by 18. authority. The question of taxing power of the states has been repeatedly considered by the Supreme Court. The Right of 19. the state to impede or embarrass the Constitutional operation 20. of the U.S. Government or the Rights which the Citizen holds 21. under it, has been uniformly denied." [McCulloch vs. 22. Maryland, 4 Wheat 316] 23. "... It may be said that a tax of one dollar for passing 24. through the state cannot sensibly affect any function of 25. government or deprive a Citizen of any valuable Right. But if 26. a state can tax ... a passenger of one dollar, it can tax him 27. a thousand dollars." [Crandall vs. Nevada, 6 Wall 35, 46]

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 17 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. "If the Right of passing through a state by a Citizen of the 3. United States is one guaranteed by the Constitution, it must 4. be sacred from state taxation." [Ibid., Pg. 47] 5. 6. 7. "The courts are not bound by mere form, nor are they to be 8. misled by mere pretenses. They are at liberty -- indeed they 9. are under a solemn duty -- to look at the substance of 10. things, whenever they enter upon the inquiry whether the 11. legislature has transcended the limits of its authority. If, 12. therefore, a statute purported to have been enacted to protect ... the public safety, has no real or substantial 13. relation to those objects or is a palpable invasion of Rights 14. secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts 15. to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the Constitution." 16. [Mulger vs. Kansas, 123 US 623, 661] 17. 18. "It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the Constitutional rights of the citizen and against any stealthy 19. encroachments thereon." [Boyd vs. United States, 116 US 616 ] 20.

21. The courts are duty bound to recognize and stop the stealthy 22. encroachments which have been made upon the Citizen's Right 23. to travel and to use the roads to transport his property in the "ordinary course of life and business." [Hadfield, 24. supra.] 25. 26. Further, the court must recognize that the Right to travel is 27. part of the Liberty of which a Citizen cannot be deprived without specific cause and without the due process of law

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 18 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. guaranteed in the Fifth Amendment. [Kent, supra.] 3.

4. "Economic necessity cannot justify a disregard of 5. Constitutional guarantee." 6. [Riley vs. Carter, 79 ALR 1018;] [16 Am.Jur. (2nd), Const. Law, Sect. 81] 7. 8. "Constitutional Rights cannot be denied simply because of 9. hostility to their assertions and exercise; vindication of 10. conceded Constitutional Rights cannot be made dependent upon 11. any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to 12. afford them." [Watson vs. Memphis, 375 US 526] 13. "No public policy of a state can be allowed to override the 14. positive guarantees of the U.S. Constitution." [16 Am.Jur. 15. (2nd), Const. Law, Sect. 70] 16. 17. "The people never give up their liberties but under some 18. delusion." [Edmund Burke, (1784)] 19. 20.

21. ATTENTION ! You will be billed for any ORDERS that you give 22. me to carry out. I will not follow any instructions other 23. than orders. Slavery is a crime, and is defined as work 24. without payment. Carrying out your orders is doing work, therefore I must be compensated. 25. 26. 27. A copy of this document was served upon Law Enforcement Officer ______

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 19 of 20 Signed______Date______1. 2. Badge Number ______On The Date Of ______Time ______3. (Remember to Take a Cell Phone Picture or Video of the officer / 4. gang member receiving the Notice, and the Officer's Badge. Your 5. GPS on your phone should be turned on. If you can, make sure to 6. fill in this document using a blue pen, and keep a copy for yourself. Be polite.) 7. 8. I have personal knowledge of the foregoing facts and am 9. competent to testify as to the truth of these facts if called as 10. a witness. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing facts are true and correct. 11. So Help Me God. May Jesus bless all who read this. 12. I reserve all rights to make amends to this document to make it more clear, precise, and 13. on point if needed. 14. _____ (Inside WA DC & Territories) Executed within the UNITED STATES (Date) ______(Inside One Of The 50 States) Executed without the UNITED STATES (Date) ______15. Under necessity, I do not consent to any matters against myself, other than that I, a Man may be 16. compensated, that Justice may be restored as I have requested, & the discharge of any liability that you may claim I have herein. 17. Sincerely, 18. All Rights Reserved And Waiving None______YOUR NAME HERE 19. 'Errors and Omissions are Consistent with Intent' 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27.

LEGAL NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT – ACTING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Item # PUBLIC NOTICE-2015-10-23 Page 20 of 20 Signed______Date______