Photo: Colourbox
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
e-harbours WP3 Work plan
Photo: Colourbox Date: 07/03/2012 Author: Maarten Hommelberg Version: 0.3 *DRAFT*
Wp3 overview The partners participating in WP3 of e-harbours are: The port of Antwerp, University of applied science in Hamburg, Zaanstad (who is also participating in WP4) and the energy label part of the project.
Figure 1: Overview of work package 3 for the duration of the project Docname
Activity 3.4 Methodology development for VPP business cases This activity should have been finalized last year, but since we had some delay setting up the show cases the deliverable for this task will be written during activity 3.5. A meeting will be set up with, at least, RGU, VITO and Hamburg, where we discuss our approach to VPP’s. This will lead to a deliverable where each of these partners contribute. The deliverable will be put on the website, so we comply with all indicators set for the activity.
Description in application form: Develop innovative methodology VPP & business case. In VPP generation, transport, storage and consumption are reflected. The energy network concept will consist of a technical lay-out and a proper business case.
Running time: Yesterday
Responsible benificiary: Hamburg
Partners contributing: VITO, RGU
Output: - 1 own meeting
- 1 published material
2 Docname
Who What When VITO, Hamburg, RGU Organize meeting 9th May VITO, Hamburg, RGU Create Deliverable End May Malmo Put deliverable on website Tbd in Aberdeen
3 Docname
Activity 3.5 Application of smart energy networks (VPP’s) The time required for the activity has been extended and the time for activity 3.5 has been shortened, because in practice the economic and technical aspects of the showcases are combined. Thus we don’t require a separate 6 months to work on the business side of the showcases, but rather two months to finalize them. This also better reflects the effort required for the technical side of the showcases. Each of the partners is expected to hold an own meeting with their local stakeholders. It is encouraged to invite other partners to these meetings. There are 6 aspects in this activity we promised to deliver and they’re all covered with the current showcases. The monitoring is done by RGU – PURE, Definitions of site specific concepts are being developed by Hamburg and VITO, where the integration of renewable is a subtopic for the VITO showcase (also for Hamburg?). The energy label is a separate topic within the project. Each of the partners produces a document describing their showcase.
Description in application form: Application and validation of the smart energy networks in show cases of partners, Phases: 1) Collection monitoring 2) Definition site specific concept 3) Further technical and economic simulation show cases considered A1) Optimal upload sustainable energies A2) Energy monitoring A3) Energy label
Responsible benificiary: VITO
Partners Contributing: Port of Antwerp, Hamburg, Zaanstad, RGU
Pending: Showcase Energy Label
Running time: September 2011 – June 2012
Who What When VITO, port of Antwerp, Every location sets up a Before July 2012 Hamburg, Zaanstad, RGU meeting with the local stakeholders VITO, port of Antwerp, Each showcase produces a Before July 2012 Hamburg, Zaanstad, RGU document describing the case, what has been done and conclusions VITO, port of Antwerp, Create 2 documets and a radio Before July 2012 Hamburg, Zaanstad, RGU or tv appearance
4 Docname
Activity 3.6 Review and improvement VPP energy concepts and methodology In this task the results of task 3.5 and 3.7 will be combined into a techno-economic analysis. This techno-economic analysis of the different showcases will be presented to the E-platform. The comments from the E-platform will be gathered in a document and each of the partners receiving comments will describe the actions taken / changes made to the showcases in the document. The updated documents on the different showcases will be taken to the local stakeholders in task 3.8.
Description in application form: Review approach VPP by E-platform of energy concepts and improved on the basis of their comments
Running time: July 2012 – August 2012
Responsible benificiary: RGU
Partners involved: VITO, Hamburg. E-Platform.
Output: - 1 own meeting
- 1 published material
TODO: - Schedule the E-platform meeting
5 Docname
Who What When VITO, Hamburg, RGU Organize meeting July 2012 VITO, Hamburg, RGU Create 1 published material July 2012 Malmo Put deliverable on website July 2012
6 Docname
Activity 3.7 Finalization Business cases VPP Since activity 3.6 already contains the economic calculations for the showcases, there could be a parallel activity that focuses on the organizational and legislative aspects of VPP’s. A long list of barriers has already been composed, we need to look at the local stakeholders and help them find a way to organize a VPP in their country within the possibilities that the local legislation offers them. If the possibilities are too limited to set up a VPP, a list of suggestions for policies that enable VPP’s should be composed. If this group works in parallel to activity 3.6 the results of the discussions applied to the different showcases can be presented at the meeting with the E-platform. In my view additional to the partners listed below the VU (Gerrit Buist) should also participate in this discussion.
Description in application form: Finalization business case VPP: Evaluation/definition of economic value; organization structure of VPP with definition roles stakeholders (industrial end-users, energy suppliers, grid operators, local authorities, aggregators). Incl. general recommendations for transnational application. The analysis will be made by each responsible partner per country and guided by the E-platform.
Running time: April 2012-September 2012
Responsible benificiary: Port of Antwerp
Partners involved: VITO, Hamburg, RGU.
Output: - 1 own meeting
TODO: - Organize a working group on organizational and legislative aspects
- Set up a meeting (can be the activity 3.6 meeting)
7 Docname
Who What When VITO, Hamburg, RGU, port of Organize meeting April 2012 Antwerp, UvA organizational and legislative aspects VITO, Hamburg, RGU, UvA Create 1 published material September 2012 Malmo Put deliverable on website September 2012
8 Docname
Activity 3.8 Review and evaluation show cases by local stakeholders After a first discussion with the local stakeholders (Activity 3.5), a review from our expert panel (Activity 3.6), we return to the local stakeholders with our results. This gives them the opportunity to evaluate our work, which we can use to gather the last recommendations for the e-harbours project. Articles on the evaluations should be presented on the website.
The WP-Leader will chair the meetings with the partners and local stakeholders and should thus be invited to the 3.8 meetings.
Description in application form: Review of the approach by local stakeholder. The results of the organizational structure of the VPP will be evaluated by the local involved stakeholder. In each country participating in the show cases a meeting with the local stakeholder will be organized by the local partner responsible for the case.
Running time: September 2012 – October 2012
Responsible benificiary: VITO
Partners involved: Hamburg, Port of Antwerp. Zaanstad, Aberdeenshire ?
Output: - 4 external meeting
- 4 published material
9 Docname
Who What When VITO, Hamburg, RGU, port of Organize meeting with local April 2012 Antwerp, UvA stakeholders VITO, Hamburg, RGU, UvA Create a published material per September 2012 meeting Malmo Put deliverable on website September 2012
10 Docname
Activity 3.9 Results assessment with main EU smart grids & cities networks All the showcases and conclusions drawn from them will be combined into one document; our point of arrival document. Then this document will be presented to the different european bodies.
Description in application form: Meetings with main EU initiatives on smart grids/smart cities: discuss results with representatives of the KIC EIT InnoEnergy. European smart grid technology platform, EREF and Energy-Cities to define future role e-harbours in EU projects.
Running time: November 2012 – December 2012
Responsible benificiary: Malmo
Partners involved: Zaanstad, Malmo, Hamburg, RGU, PURE
Output: - 4 external meetings, one per platform
- At least one article per meeting on the website
- A radio or TV appearance per platform
TODO: - Ask Guy to set up a meeting with all these parties
Point of arrival document containing all information from the entire project / implementation strategy is composed here!
11 Docname
Who What When Guy (VITO) Organize the main EU smart November 2012 grids & cities networks VITO Find location / organize November 2012 meeting Sander Write article about the meeting December 2012 Malmo Put article on website December 2012
12 Docname
Activity 3.10 Broad presentation results at relevant EU smart grids networks Dissemination in it’s broadest form. We present our point of arrival document and lessons learned at all appropriate occasions.
Description in application form: Presentation results VPP approach at E-networks: EU Smart Grid Technology platform, Energie-Cities, CoM, EREF, DG Energy and transport.
Running time: January 2013 –July 2013
Responsible benificiary: VITO
Partners involved: Zaanstad, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Malmo, Hamburg, RGU, PURE.
Output: - External meetings
- 1 Final event (external meeting)
- 5 radio and TV appearances
TODO: - Start looking for conferences / meetings where we can present our findings
Who What When All partners Find conferences and submit NOW – December 2012
13 Docname
abstracts Zaanstad Organize final event July 2013 Zaanstad, Amsterdam, 1 radio / tv appearance each Before June 2013 Antwerp, Malmo, PURE Sander Write article about the Right after conferences / radio / presentations and radio / tv tv appearances appearances Malmo Put articles on website When they become available
14