The Ringelmann Effect
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Ringelmann Effect
When does this arise?
When the average individual performance decreases as a group size increases
Eight people pulled only four times as hard as one, NOT eight times as hard
This loss of performance was due to both co-ordination and motivational problems
Mainly due to individuals within the group losing motivation
Sporting Examples:
Hockey team penalty corner drill continues to break down because the timing of the players involved does not match
Losses in performance due to co-ordination fault
A water polo team are not playing very well because one particular player is not trying very hard
Losses in performance due to motivational fault Latane (1979) also studied group performance
He also found that group performance suffered as groups got larger – due to motivation and coordination problems
Motivation losses = Social loafing
“When individuals lose motivation when in a group situation”
It is undesirable in teams – therefore if present – should be eliminated
Social loafing is caused by an individual losing their identity when placed in a group
Individuals may feel their efforts are not being recognised – by spectators or team mates
How can Social loafing ( motivation ) be avoided?
Individual performance should be highlighted
Credit given to team situations – make individuals feel important - “Tackle counts” - Rugby - “Assists” – Basketball Feedback to individuals about performance can help to combat social loafing
Support from team mates – referred to as “social support”
“Peer pressure” will aid elimination of social loafing and can serve to reinforce individual effort
How can Social loafing ( co-ordination ) be avoided?
Individuals should be selected on their interactive skills
Teachers/coaches should emphasise that good coordination will eventually lead to better performance
Games using small teams may help to coordinate the actions of different sets of players within a team