Preview of RULES for the CONDUCT OF

2018 DWD MTG – ATTACHMENT 6g

pREVIEW OF RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF DANCES WITH DOGS COMPETITIONS –

NATIONAL COMPILATION OF SUBMISSIONS

The following document is a compilation of all submissions from State/Territory ANKC Member Bodies to the review of the Rules for the Conduct of Dances with Dogs Competitions.

This document contains the full rules as they currently exist, with the State/Territory submissions relating to each relevant rule interspersed throughout the document, in rule order.

To assist navigation of the document the following layout principles have been applied:  State/Territory submissions are included in alphabetical order of the relevant State/Territory – eg Dogs ACT’s submission will be first and Dogs WA will be last.

 Each State/Territory proposal has a heading highlighted in a particular colour throughout (the colour intended to represent, as closely as possible, the relevant State/Territory’s colour): DOGS ACT PROPOSAL DOGS NSW PROPOSAL DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL DOGS SA PROPOSAL DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL DOGS WEST PROPOSAL (To facilitate navigation of the document if printing the document, it is suggested that a colour printer be used.)

 Each rule on which a submission has been received is numbered as an ‘Item’ and starts on a new page.

 Where there has been any submission on a current rule, the following heading appears followed by the existing text: CURRENT RULE

 ‘Tracking’ of text is used to indicate change. Thus deletions are shown by strike through in red; additions are shown by underlining in red; and there is a vertical line in the margin against any changed text.

 To indicate the end of documentation of submissions on a particular rule and resumption of the current rules (which are not the subject of any change proposal), the following heading appears: ------RULES CONTINUE

 Rule change proposals appear in black standard text.  Rationale appear in purple in italics.  Consequential changes (if any) appear in blue in italics.  Editorial comments are in { } brackets.

1 2018 DWD MTG – ATTACHMENT 6g

ITEM NUMBERS

Item Rule no Topic Page 1 Change of title of the discipline 7 2 Terminology of ‘Freestyle’ 9 3 Terminology of ‘competition’ 10 4 1 Introduction 11 5 2 Definitions - Order 13 6 2 Definitions - Freestyle 14 7 2 Definitions – Heelwork to Music 16 8 2 Definitions – Heelwork to Music – Percentage heelwork 17 9 3.1 Titling classes – addition of Pre-Starter and Open 19 classes 10 4.1 Qualifying certificates 21 11 4.2 DWD titles – Pre-Starter title 23 12 4.2 & DWD titles – Advanced titles 24 table 13 4.2 & DWD titles – Open title 25 table 14 Rule 4.2 DWD titles – Grand Champion 26 & table 15 Rule 4.2.3 Format of table 32 table 16 5.1 Ring size 34 17 5.8 & 5.9 Rings 35 18 5.11 Motivators outside ring 36 19 6.1 Eligibility of exhibits – age limit 39 20 6.2 Entries 40 21 6.3.2 Costume 41 22 6.3.3 Footwear 42 23 6.3.5 Music checks 44 24 6.4.2 Assembly area, availability in 45 25 7 Removal of dog 46 26 9 The routine - duration 48 27 9 Prescriptions re Open class routines 50 28 9.2.2 Dog attire – Collars, harnesses 51 29 9.2.3 Dog attire – Artificial colouring 54 30 10 Competing – Jurisdiction of Judging Panel 55 31 10 Competing – Commands/cues 56 32 10.6 Competing – Use of lead 58 33 11 Judges and judging – Judging Panel 60

Item Rule no Topic Page 34 11.2 Judges’ marking criteria 61 35 11.3 Penalties - Corrections 67 36 11.4 Disqualification 68 37 11.5.3 Marks and placings – Tied scores 72 38 Appendix Judges’ mark sheet 73 A 39 Appendix Consequential amendments 81 B OTHER ITEMS 40 Tricks Dog titles 83 & attached 41 FCI Affiliation and Championship competitions and titles 84 & attached

AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL KENNEL COUNCIL LTD

Rules for the Conduct of

Dances with Dogs Competitions {See proposed changes below} (Encompassing Dances with Dogs Freestyle & Heelwork to Music)

(Effective from 1st January, 20142019)

Adopted by the Member Bodies of the Australian National Kennel Council Limited 2008

Amended October 2010 February 2011 August 2013 August 2018

Adopted by the Member Bodies of the Australian National Kennel Council Limited

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Dogs ACT PO Box 815 DICKSON ACT 2602 Phone: (02) 6241 4404 Fax: (02) 6241 1129 Email: [email protected]

WESTERN AUSTRALIA Dogs West Cnr Ranford & Warton Roads SOUTHERN RIVER WA 6110 Phone: (08) 9455 1188 Fax: (08) 9455 1190 Email: [email protected]

QUEENSLAND Dogs Queensland PO Box 495 FORTITUDE VALLEY QLD 4006 Phone: (07) 3252 2661 Fax: (07) 3252 3864 Email: [email protected]

NORTHERN TERRITORY Dogs NT PO Box 37521 WINNELLIE NT 0821 Phone: (08) 8984 3570 Fax: (08) 8984 3409 Email: [email protected]

NEW SOUTH WALES Dogs NSW PO Box 632 ST MARYS NSW 1790 Phone: (02) 9834 3022 Fax: (02) 9834 3872 Email: [email protected]

SOUTH AUSTRALIA Dogs SA PO Box 844 PROSPECT EAST SA 5082 Phone: (08) 8349 4797 Fax: (08) 8262 5751 Email: [email protected]

TASMANIA Dogs Tasmania PO Box 116 GLENORCHY TAS 7010 Phone: (03) 6272 9443 Fax: (03) 6273 0844 Email: [email protected]

VICTORIA Dogs Victoria Locked Bag K9 CRANBOURNE VIC 3977 Phone: (03) 9788 2500 Fax: (03) 9788 2599 Email: [email protected]

CONTENTS

{Consequential change to be made later} Page 1. Introduction 4 2. Definitions 4 3. Dances with Dogs Competitions 5 4. Titles 6 5. Rings 8 6. Exhibit requirements 8 7. Removal of a dog 10 8. Withdrawal of a dog 10 9. The Routine 10 10. Competing 11 11. Judges and Judging 12 Appendix A Dances with Dogs Judges Mark Sheet 14 Appendix B Official Dances with Dogs Entry Form 15 Appendix C Guidelines for Dances with Dogs Schedules 16

ITEM 1 - CHANGE OF TITLE OF THE DISCIPLINE DOGS ACT PROPOSAL Change the name of the discipline to one of the following: Freestyle and Heelwork to Music Musical freestyle and heelwork Heelwork and Freestyle to Music Musical Freestyle

DOGS ACT RATIONALE We feel that the name Dances with Dogs provides the wrong impression for the sport with many under the impression that it implies that the handler must be able to dance or of dogs dancing. We would prefer the name not include Dancing or the word Canine (which isn’t included in any other sports). Additionally, the use of the terms Freestyle and Heelwork in the name would help people understand the sport.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Change the name of the discipline to Canine Music Sports (encompassing Freestyle and Heelwork to Music).

DOGS QUEENSLAND RATIONALE The term ‘Dances with Dogs’ gives an impression that the dog and/or handler ‘dance’ in the common understanding of that term. This tends to create an expectation among the general public of dogs walking on their hind legs and even wearing costumes, which demeans the sport. It can also be a deterrent to prospective handlers who consider themselves to have no ability or capacity to develop the ability to ‘dance’. Using ‘Canine Music Sports’ as the umbrella discipline title would help overcome these misconceptions.

Consequential changes would be made throughout the document; these have not been made at this point, pending endorsement or otherwise of the proposal.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL Change of title of sport from “Dances with Dogs” to “Canine Musical Sports”.

Note: this submission would not change the existing divisions of Freestyle and Heelwork to Music.

Proposed Amendment: That the updated rules and all references to the (existing) sport of Dances with Dogs be amended to read “Canine Musical Sports”.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE  The existing name of the sport does not encourage participation. As our sport struggles currently to gain numbers relative to other canine sports, we need to consider the future of the sport and its appeal to the wider community.

 The current name is often incorrectly called “Doggy Dancing”.

 The current name gives the incorrect and off-putting perception that the handler must be a proficient dancer. This could discourage older participants or participants with disabilities and is not inclusive.

 The current name of “Dances with Dogs” puts the emphasis on the dancing ability of the handler to dance with their dogs. However the emphasis should be on the dog, and less on the handler’s dancing ability.

 The proposed name of Canine Musical Sports places the emphasis on

 the dog  the incorporation of music (which is a point of difference to other ANKC sports),  and strengthens the perception that this is a sport, not a dancing contest.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGES: Any changes to nomenclature would require consequential changes in the 36 instances where ‘Dances with Dogs’ appears in the Rules.

ITEM 2 – TERMINOLOGY OF ‘FREESTYLE’ DOGS SA PROPOSAL Change the title of the Freestyle Division to “Canine Freestyle”.

{The Dogs SA submission first raised this proposal in relation to Rule 1.2 as below.}

1.2 Dances with Dogs encompasses two separate divisions: (a) Canine Freestyle and (b) Heelwork to Music.

DOGS SA RATIONALE  The term Canine Freestyle is used internationally and easily recognised. Eg World Canine Freestyle Organization (US); Canine Freestyle Federation (US); Canine Freestyle GB (UK); Paws 2 Dance Canine Freestyle Organization (Canada). Renaming one division of Dances with Dogs as ‘Canine Freestyle’ acknowledges these international routes, without the need to rename the whole sport.  ‘Freestyle’ is vague. ‘Canine Freestyle’ is more specific.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGES On almost all occasions where ‘Freestyle’ is mentioned in the rules, it will need to be changed to ‘Canine Freestyle’.

ITEM 3 – TERMINOLOGY OF ‘COMPETITION’

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL Change of reference from “competitions” to “trials”.

Proposed Amendment: That the updated rules and all references to competitions be amended to read trials.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE This submission asserts that the primary intent of current competitions is NOT to establish superiority over others, but is to be a test of performance.

The dictionary definition of a competition is as follows, and does not reflect the intent of the (currently named) competitions.

o the activity or condition of striving to gain or win something by defeating or establishing superiority over others. o an event or contest in which people take part in order to establish superiority or supremacy in a particular area.

The dictionary definition of “trial” is as follows, and reflects the intent of current “competitions” to be a test of performance, resulting in Qualifying or Non-qualifying scores. :

Noun: o a formal examination of evidence by a judge, typically before a jury, in order to decide guilt in a case of criminal or civil proceedings. o a test of the performance, qualities, or suitability of someone or something.

Verb o test (something, especially a new product) to assess its suitability or performance. o (of a horse, dog, or other animal) compete in trials. o "the pup trialled on Saturday"

NOTE: This would also bring the terminology in line with other dog sports within the ANKC, such as Obedience, Rally O, Agility, Lure Coursing, Tracking, Herding etc.

ITEM 4 – RULE 1 - INTRODUCTION

1.0 INTRODUCTION CURRENT RULES 1.1 Dances with Dogs competitions provide handlers and their dogs with an opportunity to demonstrate a skilful, choreographed routine, performed to music. 1.2 Dances with Dogs encompasses two separate divisions: (a) Freestyle and (b) Heelwork to Music. 1.3 Dances with Dogs has its foundation in traditional obedience heelwork. However, in the discipline of Dances with Dogs, the inclusion of innovative and creative moves, and movement in time to and interpretation of the music are expected. 1.4 The discipline requires a good rapport between dog and handler, reflected in a high level of teamwork. 1.5 Dances with Dogs performances should have spectator appeal. 1.6 In the event that interpretation of these Rules is required, clarification should be sought, in writing, through the relevant member body, from the Dances with Dogs Committee of the ANKC, the decision of which will be binding. 1.7 Any person making an entry in a Dances with Dogs competition does so at their own risk. 1.8 The National Dances with Dogs Committee shall review and may recommend to the ANKC change(s) to these Rules at five-yearly intervals.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL 1.1 Dances with Dogs competitions provide handlers and their dogs with an opportunity to demonstrate a skilful, choreographed routine, performed to music.

1.2 Dances with Dogs encompasses two separate divisions: (a) Freestyle and (b) Heelwork to Music.

1.3 Dances with Dogs has its foundation in traditional obedience heelwork. However, in the discipline of Dances with Dogs, the inclusion of innovative and creative moves, and movement in time to and interpretation of the music are expected. The purpose of these rules is to encourage the owners, trainers and handlers to further develop and extend their skills by participating in the discipline of Dances with Dogs. The rules are designed in such a way that all breeds are able to compete on an equal footing and the welfare of the dog is guaranteed.

1.4 The objective in DWD is for the dog and handler to devise and perform together an artistic routine combined with music and presented with obvious co-operation between a dog that is willing and working well and a supportive handler. The training involved for this discipline will increase the dogs’ willingness to respond to their handlers and thus their overall behaviour in everyday life. Trained dogs will contribute to the acceptance of dogs and their owners and owners in the society in general.

1.5 The discipline requires a good rapport between dog and handler, reflected in a high level of teamwork. 1.6 Dances with Dogs performances should have spectator appeal.

1.5 In the event that interpretation of these Rules is required, clarification should be sought, in writing, through the relevant member body, from the Dances with Dogs Committee of the ANKC, the decision of which will be binding.

1.6 Any person making an entry in a Dances with Dogs competition does so at their own risk.

1.7 The National Dances with Dogs Committee shall review and may recommend to the ANKC change(s) to these Rules at five-yearly intervals.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE The revised text is based on the FCI Rules for Dog Dancing Competitions and describes the sport in a very positive manner which is more encouraging of participation than some of the current wording which it is proposed to replace.

ITEM 5 – RULE 2 - DEFINITIONS - ORDER

2.0 DEFINITIONS DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL Change the order in which terms are listed so that “Dances with Dogs” comes before “Freestyle”.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE “Dances with Dogs” is talking about Freestyle and Heelwork to Music , the definition of these should follow the definition which is referencing them.

------RULES CONTINUE

Where referred to in these Rules, the following words will have the meanings assigned to them below:

“Affiliate”: a member body of a Canine Control conducting a Dances with Dogs competition.

"ANKC Ltd member body" or "member body": the ANKC Ltd member body in each State or Territory of Australia.

ITEM 6 – RULE 2 - DEFINITIONS - FREESTYLE

CURRENT RULE “Freestyle”: a division of Dances with Dogs, in which the dog works off lead and in which the routine may, subject to the provisions of these Rules, encompass a variety of moves, including heelwork and non-heelwork moves to present an interpretation of their music; there is no prescription as to the nature of moves or the level of heelwork required in Freestyle routines.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL “Freestyle”: a division of Dances with Dogs, in which the dog works off lead and in which the routine may, subject to the provisions of these Rules, encompass a variety of moves, including heelwork and non-heelwork moves to present an interpretation of their music; any moves that are not covered by the definition of Heelwork to Music below are regarded as Freestyle moves. There is no prescription as to the nature of moves or the level of heelwork required in Freestyle routines other than that the safety of the dog must not be compromised.

Both the Freestyle and Heelwork to Music moves must be taken into account in awarding the score.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Clarification may be required that any non-HTM position or move falls within the description of Freestyle and that all elements of a routine are considered in judging.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL “Freestyle”: a division of Dances with Dogs, in which the dog works off lead and in which the routine mayshould, subject to the provisions of these Rules, encompass a variety of moves, including heelwork and non-heelwork moves to present an interpretation of their music; there is no prescription as to the nature of moves or the level of heelwork required in Freestyle routines. At any class level, a minimum of 70% of a Freestyle routine must consist of freestyle moves; the percentage of freestyle moves in a routine is based on the time spent performing the freestyle moves. The remainder of the routine may consist of heelwork.

DOGS SA RATIONALE  For consistency sake, the freestyle definition would match that of heelwork (but with inverse requirements). As it is specified that 70% of heelwork is required in a Heelwork to Music routine, it is logical to also specify the requirements for Freestyle.  This proposed amendment is designed to clarify what is meant by Freestyle. The need for this further clarification has come about because many otherwise technically excellent routines have been marked down as they could be mistaken for Heelwork to Music, and there appears to be a lack of understanding of the definition of Freestyle. A Freestyle routine that is largely Heelwork does not have the same flair or spectator appeal that is expected of Freestyle. (Rule 1.5)  Competitors, especially those new to Dances with Dogs, are often unsure of the difference between the two categories, and explaining the percentage of HTM in a FS routine would contribute to their understanding.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE: The entry form in appendix B would need to change.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL “Freestyle”: a division of Dances with Dogs, in which the dog works off lead and in which the routine may, subject to the provisions of these Rules, encompass a variety of moves, including heelwork and non-heelwork moves to present an interpretation of their music; there is no prescription as to the nature of moves or the level of heelwork required in Freestyle routines. At any class level, a minimum of 70% of a Freestyle routine must consist of Freestyle moves, the percentage of Freestyle moves in a routine is based on the time spent performing the Freestyle moves. The remainder of the routine may consist of Heelwork.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE So that Freestyle is more than just a heelwork to music style routine with some tricks added. This is to be consistent with the rule for a Heelwork routine which says:

This way, there is a clear differentiation between a Freestyle routine and a Heelwork to Music routine.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE: The Entry Form in Appendix B needs to include % of Freestyle and % of Heelwork.

DOGS WEST PROPOSAL “Freestyle”: a division of Dances with Dogs, in which the dog works off lead and in which the routine may, subject to the provisions of these Rules, encompass a variety of moves, including heelwork which at any class level can only be to a maximum of 30% and non- heelwork moves to present an interpretation of their music; there is no prescription as to the nature of moves or the level of heelwork required in Freestyle routines.

DOGS WEST RATIONALE This brings the ruling in line with the Heelwork to Music section where a routine can only consist of 30 % freestyle moves, it is important to show a clear and defined difference between the two disciplines and ensure that we see a clear difference in routine performance in the two divisions. It would also bring us in to line with expectations from other countries such as the UK which demand a 70 % freestyle routine.

ITEM 7 – RULE 2 - DEFINITIONS – HEELWORK TO MUSIC

CURRENT RULE “Dances with Dogs”: an ANKC approved canine sport which encompasses both (a) Freestyle and (b) Heelwork to Music divisions.

“Heelwork to Music”: a division of Dances with Dogs in which the dog works off lead in any of the following heel positions, moving at any pace and in any direction:

(a) Dog on Right Hand Side of handler: 1- facing forwards 2- facing backwards (b) Dog on Left Hand Side of handler 3- facing forwards 4- facing backwards (c) Dog across front of handler: 5- facing left 6- facing right (d) Dog across back of handler: 7- facing left 8- facing right DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Add the following after the listing of positions: A dog may be regarded as in one of the above heelwork positions if it meets the positional requirements above and is moving in position while on four or three legs or momentarily static in a stand or sit position.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Providing additional postures in which the dog may perform the heelwork positions provides greater flexibility and allows for greater creativity in HTM routines.

The dog must: (a) move parallel to the handler in one of the nominated heelwork positions; (b) keep the same distance in relation to the handler in all positions; (c) move in the same direction as the handler; (d) move at the same pace as the handler.

ITEM 8 – RULE 2 - DEFINITIONS – HEELWORK TO MUSIC – PERCENTAGE HEELWORK

CURRENT RULE At any class level a minimum of 70% of a Heelwork to Music routine must consist of heelwork, during which the dog’s shoulder should be reasonably close to the handler’s leg; the percentage of heelwork in a routine is based on the time spent undertaking heelwork positions. The remainder of the routine may consist of freestyle. DOGS ACT PROPOSAL Retain 70% as the minimum heelwork content in a HTM routine.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE We would not like to see the percentage of heelwork required increased unless the definition of heelwork was to include ‘transitions’ (i.e., the dog moving directly from one heel position to another). Under the current rules (70% heelwork requirement) in one minute of routine, 42 seconds must be in heelwork, leaving 18 seconds for ‘freestyle’. However, the 18 seconds is also required to transition from one heel position to another. For a quick and agile dog, it may take 2-4 seconds to transition (i.e., single leg weave, 180 turn, etc), however, for a larger, less flexible, slower, nervous or older dog, the same transition may take 4-8 seconds. Therefore, some competitors are at a disadvantage in using any additional time simply to transition, while others can include more transitions and ‘freestyle’ moves or use this to add even a start and finish pose. Further, we believe ‘finding’ each of the eight heel positions is also “heelwork” and therefore moving directly from one heel position to another – a transition – should be included in the definition of heelwork, rather than a ‘freestyle’ component. This should only apply to short and direct transitions to take up a new heel position. For example:  a 180 degree turn (i.e., from (b) Dog on left hand side of handler 3 – facing forwards to 4- facing backwards)  a 180 degree turn and move half way around handler (i.e., from a) Dog on right hand side of handler 1-facing forwards to b) dog on left side of handler facing forwards)  moving 90, 180 or 270 degrees forwards or backwards around handler (i.e., from c) Dog across front of handler 5-facing left to b) Dog on left hand side of hander 4- facing backwards), and  a single leg weave to heel position on the opposite side. To avoid the overuse of transitions (which would in any case be reflected in the judges’ scoring) we would further suggest that the inclusion of transitions in the heelwork component be limited to three transitions per minute of routine, thereby covering at a minimum the three heel positions suggested for starter level and up to 12 transitions at Advanced level. Alternatively, simply including transitions in the heelwork component and then increasing the overall heelwork component to 75% or even 80% would be acceptable. This would provide fairer timing across all breeds and levels of ability, particularly larger, less flexible, older or slower dogs. It would also put focus on dogs finding heel positions and this being included as a technical skill reflected in the scoring. However, we feel the status quo to be the easier option and that this is current workable and caters for dogs’ different abilities and speeds.

DOGS NSW PROPOSAL 2.00 (final paragraph): At any class level a minimum of 7075% of a Heelwork to Music routine must consist of heelwork, during which the dog’s shoulder should be reasonably close to the handler’s leg; the percentage of heelwork in a routine is based on the time spent undertaking heelwork positions. The remainder of the routine may consist of freestyle. 25% only of the total marks should be awarded to Freestyle moves in a Heelwork Routine.

DOGS NSW RATIONALE 25% non Heelwork in a Heelwork routine gives adequate time for the non Heelwork start, finish, transitions. (In accordance with 9.1.3, in a 1 minute routine, time allowed for non heelwork is 15 seconds; 1min 30, would give 22.5 seconds; 2 min 15: 33.75 seconds; 3 min: 45 sec.) Competitors would be encouraged to include more heelwork moves and perhaps some duration in the positions. Easier for the competitors to calculate, and for judges to estimate.

Freestyle moves can be spectacular, and in a Heelwork Routine where there are prescribed positions for the execution of the heelwork, these moves may overbear the actual heelwork. However, since the Division is Heelwork, which must be at least 75% of the routine, and at least 75% of the marks, then only 25% of the marks can be awarded to non heelwork.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL At any class level a minimum of 70% of a Heelwork to Music routine must consist of heelwork, during which the dog’s shoulder should be reasonably close to the handler’s leg; the percentage of heelwork in a routine is based on the time spent undertaking heelwork positions; a routine which contains less than 70% in heelwork will be awarded a non- qualifying score and the result will be recorded as NQ. The remainder of the routine may consist of freestyle. Both the Heelwork to Music and non-Heelwork to Music moves must be taken into account in awarding the score.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Clarification that failure to include at least 70% in heelwork positions results in a non- qualifying score and that all elements of a routine are considered in judging. At present the rules talk about must be 70% heelwork but there is nowhere where a penalty is prescribed where there is less than 70% heelwork.

3.0 DANCES WITH DOGS COMPETITIONS

The scheduling of any Dances with Dogs competition shall be subject to the approval of the relevant member body. An Affiliate conducting a Dances with Dogs competition shall offer all of the titling classes listed in section 3.1 below.

ITEM 9 – RULE 3.1 – TITLING CLASSES – ADDITION OF PRE- STARTER AND OPEN CLASSES

CURRENT RULE

3.1 Titling Classes

The following titling classes are available in the Freestyle and Heelwork to Music divisions of Dances with Dogs competitions.

3.1.1 Freestyle

(a) FREESTYLE STARTER: For dogs that have not qualified for the Starter title.

(b) FREESTYLE NOVICE: For dogs that have qualified for the title of ‘Freestyle Starter’ (FS.S.).

(c) FREESTYLE INTERMEDIATE: For dogs that have qualified for the title of ‘Freestyle Novice’ ( FS.N.).

(d) FREESTYLE ADVANCED: For dogs that have qualified for the title of ‘Freestyle Intermediate’ (FS.I.).

3.1.2 Heelwork to Music

(a) HEELWORK TO MUSIC STARTER: For dogs that have not qualified for the Starter title.

(b) HEELWORK TO MUSIC NOVICE: For dogs that have qualified for the title of ‘Heelwork to Music Starter’ (HTM.S.).

(c) HEELWORK TO MUSIC INTERMEDIATE: For dogs that have qualified for the title of ‘Heelwork to Music Novice’ (HTM.N.)

(d) HEELWORK TO MUSIC ADVANCED: For dogs that have qualified for the title of ‘Heelwork to Music Intermediate’ (HTM.I.).

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL

[Include] (a) FREESTYLE PRE-STARTER: For dogs that have not qualified for the Starter title (FS.S).

[Include] (a) HEELWORK TO MUSIC PRE-STARTER: For dogs that have not qualified for the Starter title (HTM.S).

DOGS VIC RATIONALE Introduction of the Pre-Starter class: This class is intended as an optional class for those who may have less experience in training and competing with dogs, or have a very young green dog, who may not be quite ready for the Starter class. It is an attempt to encourage new people into the sport and, over time, help raise numbers of participants in trials. It is also meant to assist those starting out to get some trial experience with their dog and to then step up to the Starter class. The option of using a (loose) lead in this class brings Dances with

Dogs in line with the CCD title in Obedience and the RN title in Rally Obedience where the first class is performed on lead.

It is intended that the Pre Starter class is judged at a similar level to the Starter class, and requires similar type of moves, however the main difference is the option of allowing the dog to perform the routine on lead. The lead should remain loose throughout the routine and under no circumstances should the dog be corrected with the lead while in the ring.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGES

Rule 4, 9 & 10 (as per below).

[Include] (f) FREESTYLE OPEN: For any dog eligible to compete in a Dances with Dogs competition.

[Include] (f) HEELWORK TO MUSIC OPEN: For any dog eligible to compete in a Dances with Dogs competition.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE Introduction of the Open class: There is a large increase in the difficulty between the Novice and the Intermediate class. This class is intended to fill a gap between these two classes when a dog may have completed their Novice title but is not yet at the Intermediate level. This is why the moves/requirements and skill level have been set at the upper-novice level. To set the standard for this class at Intermediate level or above would be counterproductive as dogs with their Intermediate and Advanced titles can still compete in the Intermediate class. Once a dog has their Novice Title there is no other class for them except Intermediate, and many people stop entering trials at this point as the difference in the standard of Novice to Intermediate is very high. The Open class also offers a little more structure by listing a set of (novice level) moves that must be performed during the routine that may assist some handlers with their choreography, or act as an additional challenge when choreographing a routine.

In addition, this class may be enjoyable for dogs and handlers who have completed higher titles and would like to step back into the Open class. As their dog ages a handler may feel the physical demands placed on their dog to perform some of the more advanced moves is too much and would like to still compete with their dog but no longer at the Advanced or Intermediate level. This is why options have been given in the Freestyle Open class between two different moves to satisfy the requirement, so dogs are not excluded due to their breed or age.

In all of the above situations, it is hoped that the Open class will increase the number of dogs and handlers entering a competition, and encourage people to continue longer in the sport. The inclusion of the title suffix (FS.O2 etc.) is to encourage people to continue to enter competitions once they have completed the requirements for their titles, rather than stopping once they have earned the titles they have aimed for.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGES: Rules 4 and 9 (as per below).

3.1.3 Progression through titling classes

3.1.3.1 A dog shall not be entered for any class in either division without previously having qualified, and an application having been lodged, for the title at the level of the previous class.

3.1.3.2 A dog which has gained sufficient Qualifying Certificates for the title of FS.S., HTM.S., FS.N. or HTM.N. shall not be eligible to compete in any further class at that level except in a competition for which entries closed before the final qualification score required for that title was gained.

3.1.3.3 At the discretion of the Affiliate’s nominee, a competitor who completes the necessary Qualifying Certificates for a title and has applied for that title after the closing of entries may request and be transferred to the next higher class in the relevant division.

3.2 Non-titling Classes

An Affiliate conducting a Dances with Dogs competition may, at its discretion, offer non- titling classes.

ITEM 10 – RULE 4.1 – QUALIFYING CERTIFICATES CURRENT RULE

4.0 TITLES

4.1 Qualifying Certificates

To be awarded a Qualifying Certificate, a competitor must gain the following from at least two of the three judges: (a) a score of at least ten (10) points in each of the three (3) judging categories; and (b) a total score of at least forty-five (45) points.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL 4.1 Qualifying Certificates

To be awarded a Qualifying Certificate, a competitor must gain the following from at least two of the three judges: (a) a score of at least ten (10) points in each of the three (3) judging categories; and (b) a total score of at least forty-five (45) points; (c) individual judges scores to be shown on pass certificate.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE: So that it is possible to look back at pass cards and see scores from individual judges.

ITEM 11 – RULE 4.2 – DWD TITLES - PRE-STARTER TITLE

CURRENT RULE

4.2 Dances with Dogs titles

4.2.1 All dogs eligible to be entered in a Dances with Dogs competition in accordance with these Rules shall be eligible to receive Title Certificates upon meeting the requirements set out in Rule 4.2.2 below.

4.2.2 The member body will receive applications for the use of the relevant title letters in connection with the name of each dog, when the dog has gained Qualifying Certificates in accordance with the following requirements:

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL (a) ‘FS.PS/HTM.PS signifying Freestyle Pre-Starter/Heelwork to Music Pre- Starter in connection with, and after the name of, each dog, which has gained a total of two (2) Qualifying Certificates in the Starter class in the relevant division

DOGS VIC RATIONALE Pre Starters would be a titling class, therefore the Pre Starters Title would need to be included in the Rules as a Title.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE: Renumber following paragraphs.

------RULES CONTINUE (a) ‘FS.S’/ ‘HTM.S’ signifying Freestyle Starter/Heelwork to Music Starter in connection with, and after the name of, each dog, which has gained a total of three (3) Qualifying Certificates in the Starter class in the relevant division, under at least two (2) different Judging Panels.

(b) ‘FS.N’/ ‘HTM.N’ signifying Freestyle Novice/Heelwork to Music Novice in connection with, and after the name of, each dog, which has gained a total of three (3) Qualifying Certificates in the Novice class in the relevant division, under at least two (2) different Judging Panels.

(c) ‘FS.I’/ ‘HTM.I’ signifying Freestyle Intermediate/Heelwork to Music Intermediate in connection with, and after the name of, each dog, which has gained a total of three (3) Qualifying Certificates in the Intermediate class in the relevant division, under at least two (2) different Judging Panels.

ITEM 12 – RULE 4.2 and TABLE IN RULE 4.2.3 – DWD TITLES – ADVANCED TITLES

CURRENT RULE

(d) ‘FS.A’/ ‘HTM.A’ signifying Freestyle Advanced/Heelwork to Music Advanced in connection with, and after the name of, each dog, which has gained a total of three (3) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced class in the relevant division, under at least two (2) different Judging Panels.

(d) ‘FS.A’/ ‘HTM.A’ signifying Freestyle Advanced/Heelwork to Music Advanced in connection with, and after the name of, each dog, which has gained a total of three (3) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced class in the relevant division, with aggregate scores of 150 points or more, under at least two (2) different Judging Panels.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE To show a progression of improvement through the classes.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE - table in Rule 4.2.3

Class Advanced Champion Title FS.A unchanged HTM.A Number of certificates 3 with aggregate scores of 150 points or more

Minimum number of 2 judging panels

ITEM 13 – RULE 4.2 and TABLE IN RULE 4.2.3 – DWD TITLES - OPEN TITLE

[Include] (g) ‘FS.O’/’HTM.O’ signifying Freestyle Open/Heelwork to Music Open in connection with, and after the name of, each dog, which has gained a total of three (3) Qualifying Certificates in the Open class in the relevant division, under at least two (2) different Judging Panels.

Multiplier suffixes for FS.O/HTM.O may be awarded for multiples of three certificates gained e.g. 9 FS.O qualifications is equal to FS.O3.

Applications may be made for any multiplier suffix title without requiring applications for any predecessor suffixes i.e. an owner may apply directly for FS.O7 without any requirement to apply and pay for FS.O2, FS.O3, FS.O4, FS.O5 and FS.O6 titles

DOGS VIC RATIONALE Open would be a titling class, therefore the Open Title would need to be included in the Rules as a Title.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE: 4.2.3 The table will need to be updated to include the Open class and the requirement of 3 certificates under at least 2 different judging panels.

(e) ‘FS.Ch’/’HTM.Ch’ signifying Freestyle Champion/ Heelwork to Music Champion in connection with, and before the name of, each dog which has gained its FS.A or HTM.A title respectively and thereafter gains a further seven (7) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced class in the relevant division, with aggregate scores of 160 points or more, under at least three (3) different Judging Panels.

Those additional seven (7) Qualifying Certificates must include at least three (3) different pieces of music, which may include music used for the Advanced title. Evidence of the use of different pieces of music must be supplied to the member body when applying for the Championship title. In the case of dogs which have attained Qualifying Certificates towards the Championship title prior to 1 January 2014, those Qualifying Certificates may be counted in accordance with the rules effective to 31 December 2013. Qualifying Scores achieved after 1 January 2014 must satisfy the requirements of this Rule.

ITEM 14 – RULE 4.2 and TABLE IN RULE 4.2.3 – DWD TITLES – GRAND CHAMPION TITLE/S

DOGS NSW PROPOSAL (f) DWD Gr Ch signifying Dances With Dogs Grand Champion in connection with and before the name of each dog which has gained its F.S.Ch and HTM Ch titles and thereafter gains a further five (5) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced Class in EACH of FS and HTM Divisions with an aggregate score of 160 points or more, under at least two (2) Judging Panels in each division, and, in each Division, must include two (2) pieces of music which have never been used by dog or handler in any division up-to and including Advanced Titles and Championship Titles. Evidence of the use of the different pieces of music must be supplied to the Member Body when applying for the Title of Grand Champion.

All Qualifying Certificates towards the title of DWD Gr Ch must be gained on or after 1st January, 2019.

DOGS NSW RATIONALE {{None provided.}}

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE: 4.2.3: Summary of requirements for Titles, addition of Grand Champion to the table.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Add the following after paragraph (e):

(f) ‘FS.Gr.Ch’/’HTM.Gr.Ch’ signifying Freestyle Grand Champion/Heelwork to Music Grand Champion in connection with, and before the name of, each dog which has gained its Freestyle/Heelwork to Music Championship and thereafter gains a further five (5) Qualifying Certificates in the Freestyle Advanced class in the relevant Division, with aggregate scores of 165 points or more, under at least three (3) different Judging Panels.

Those additional five (5) Qualifying Certificates must include at least two (2) pieces of music different from those used for the Advanced or Championship titles. Evidence of the use of different pieces of music must be supplied to the member body when applying for the Grand Championship title.

Qualifying Certificates towards the title of Grand Champion must be achieved after 1 January 2019.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Providing separate Grand Champion titles for each of the HTM and Freestyle Divisions recognises the distinct range of skills required for each and affirms the distinctiveness of each Division.

160 points is the minimum score required for Championship level; it is proposed that a higher standard – 165 points or more (91.6% of total marks) – be required for the title of Grand Champion The requirement for a Grand Champion of a minimum of 5 qualifying scores of 165

points (91.6%) or more following completion of the Championship title is similar to that for Obedience, viz 5 qualifying scores of 185 points (92.5%) or more under at least 3 different judges, subsequent to the UDX and Champion titles.

It is considered that the two pieces of music should be different from those used both in attainment of both their Advanced title and in their Championship title.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE – Table in Rule 4.2.3

Class Starter Novice Intermediat Advanced Champion Grand e Champion Title FS.S FS.N FS.I FS.A FS.Ch FS/Gr/Ch HTM.S HTM.N HTM.I HTM.A HTM.Ch HTM.Gr.Ch Number of 3 3 3 3 7 (subsequent 5 (subsequent to certificate to Advanced the Champion s title) with title) with aggregate aggregate scores scores of 160 of 165 points or points or more more and and including including at least at least 3 2 pieces of music different not used for pieces of Advanced or music Champion title Minimum 2 2 2 2 3 3 number of Judging Panels

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL Insert the following:

(f) ‘Grand Ch FS’/’Grand CH HTM’ signifying Freestyle Grand Champion/ Heelwork to Music Grand Champion in connection with, and before the name of, each dog which has gained its FS.CH or HTM.CH title respectively and thereafter gains a further five (5) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced class in the relevant division, with aggregate scores of 165 points or more, under at least three (3) different Judging Panels.

Those additional five (5) Qualifying Certificates must include at least two (2) different pieces of music, which may include music used for the Advanced title. Evidence of the use of different pieces of music must be supplied to the member body when applying for the Championship title.

In the case of dogs which have attained Qualifying Certificates towards the Championship title prior to 1 January 2019, those Qualifying Certificates may be counted in accordance with the rules effective to 31 December 2018. Qualifying Scores achieved after 1 January 2019 must satisfy the requirements of this Rule.

Class Advanced Champion Grand Champion

Title FS.A unchanged FS.Gr.Ch HTM.A HTM.Gr.Ch Number of 3 5 (subsequent to certificates Champion title) with aggregate scores of 165 points or more and including at least 2 different pieces of music

Minimum number of 2 3 judging panels

DOGS VIC RATIONALE Addition of Grand Champion in each class.

DOGS VICTORIA FIRST ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL Insert the following additional paragraph: (f) ‘FS.Gr.Ch’/’HTM.Gr.Ch’ signifying Freestyle Grand Champion/ Heelwork to Music Grand Champion in connection with, and before the name of, each dog which has gained its FS.Ch or HTM.Ch title respectively and thereafter gains a further five (5) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced class in the relevant division, with aggregate scores of 165 points or more, under at least three (3) different Judging Panels. At least one of the Qualifying Certificates must be of a class winning score.

Those additional five (5) Qualifying Certificates must include at least two (2) different pieces of music, which may not include music used for the Advanced or Championship title. Evidence of the use of different pieces of music must be supplied to the member body when applying for the Grand Championship title.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE In introducing the Grand Championship title, it is important to keep the two divisions, Heelwork To Music and Freestyle, separate just like with the Championship titles for two reasons:

1. There are enough differences between the two divisions to be counted as separate disciplines.

This is not the same as in Agility where Jumping is categorically a subset of Agility. There nothing in Jumping that is not in Agility. Therefore it is appropriate that the Agility Championship title requires points in both Agility and Jumping, and the Jumping Championship title does not exist.

2. Maintaining the clear separation between Heelwork To Music and Freestyle is necessary to support the push for the ANKC to approve the HTM and Freestyle Champion/Grand Champion titles to be part of multi Champion/Grand Champion titles for dogs with the respective conformation titles, e.g. Dual Ch (FS) (HTM) or Dual Gr Ch (FS) (HTM).

Making the Grand Championship title a combined title will nullify the chance of making this happen.

Minimum Number of Class Title Number of Certificates Judging Panels FS.S Starter 3 2 HTM.S FS.N Novice 3 2 HTM.N FS.I Intermediate 3 2 HTM.I FS.A Advanced 3 2 HTM.A 7 FS.Ch with aggregate scores of 160 Champion points or more including at 3 HTM.Ch least 3 different pieces of music 5 with aggregate scores of 165 points or more including at Grand FS.Gr.Ch least 2 different pieces of 3 Champion HTM.Gr.Ch music. At least one of the Qualifying Certificates must be of a class winning score.

DOGS VICTORIA SECOND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL Insert the following additional paragraph: (f) ‘DWD Gr Ch’ signifying Dances With Dogs Grand Champion in connection with, and before the name of, each dog which has gained its FS.Ch and HTM.Ch title respectively and thereafter gains a further five (5) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced class in both divisions (Freestyle and Heelwork to Music), with aggregate scores of 160 points or more, under at least three (3) different Judging Panels. Those additional five (5) Qualifying Certificates in each Division must include at least two (2) different pieces of music, which may not include music used for the Advanced or Champion title. Evidence of the use of different pieces of music must be supplied to the member body when applying for the Championship title. In the case of dogs which have attained Qualifying Certificates towards the Grand Championship title prior to 1 January 2018, those Qualifying Certificates may be counted in accordance with these rules effective to 1 January 2018.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE Introduction of the Grand Champion Title: The Champion title rewards those dogs who specialise and excel in their chosen Division of DWD competitions. The Gr Ch title is intended to reward those dogs versatile in both Divisions and succeed at the highest levels of both Heelwork to Music and Freestyle. It also gives those dogs and handlers at the top of the sport a further chance to develop and perform their skills and be rewarded for their dog’s abilities.

This title will reward the teams that are versatile in both Divisions, while not removing any of the achievements of the Champion title for those dog/handler teams specialising in one Division only.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE – Table in Rule 4.2.3 4.2.3 The table will need to be updated to include the Grand Champion title and the requirement of 5 certificates under at least 3 different judging panels with an aggregate score of 160 points or more and including at least 2 different pieces of music.

DOGS WEST PROPOSAL Add the following after paragraph (e): (f) ‘DWD GR CH signifying DANCES WITH DOGS GRAND CHAMPION in connection with, and before the name of, each dog which has gained its FS.Ch and HTM.Ch title and after completion of the HTM CH title a further five (5) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced class with aggregate scores of 160 points or more, under at least two (2) different Judging Panels will count to the DWD GR CH and after completion of the FS CH title a further five (5) Qualifying Certificates in the Advanced class with aggregate scores of 160 points or more, under at least two (2) different Judging Panels will count to the DWD GR CH

Those additional ten (10) Qualifying Certificates (5) from the Heelwork to Music Division and (5) from the freestyle division, must include at least two (2) different pieces of music, which may not include music used for the Advanced or Championship title. Evidence of the use of different pieces of music must be supplied to the member body when applying for the Grand Championship title.

DOGS WEST RATIONALE In introducing the Grand Championship title, it must be shown that the dog can perform more than what is required for a Champion title. By proposing the title of Dances with Dogs Grand Champion it will mean that this dog has embraced all facets of the sport and performed it at an exemplary level on a consistent basis. It is important to note that whilst there are two divisions in Dances with Dogs it is only one discipline, and to encompass the sport as a whole and be named Grand Champion the dog should be able to demonstrate a high degree of performance in both divisions.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE These titles need to be added to the Table under Rule 4.2.3.

Minimum Number of Class Title Number of Certificates Judging Panels FS.S Starter 3 2 HTM.S FS.N Novice 3 2 HTM.N FS.I Intermediate 3 2 HTM.I FS.A Advanced 3 2 HTM.A 7 (subsequent to Advanced FS.Ch Title) with aggregate scores of Champion 3 HTM.Ch 160 points or more including at least 3 different pieces of music Grand DWD GRAND 5 from heelwork to music 2 Champion CH 5 from freestyle with aggregate scores of 160 points or more including at least 2 different pieces of music

ITEM 15 –TABLE IN RULE 4.2.3 – FORMAT OF TABLE

CURRENT RULE 4.2.3 The following is a summary of the requirements for titles at each level. Only the highest Dances with Dogs title in each division awarded to the dog shall be used in connection with the name of the dog.

Class Starter Novice Intermediate Advanced Champion Title FS.S FS.N FS.I FS.A FS.Ch HTM.S HTM.N HTM.I HTM.A HTM.Ch Number of 3 3 3 3 7 (subsequent to certificates Advanced title) with aggregate scores of 160 points or more and including at least 3 different pieces of music Minimum 2 2 2 2 3 number of Judging Panels

PROPOSAL FROM DOGS VICTORIA AND DOGS WEST {That the format of the table in Rule 4.2.3 be altered to list titles horizontally rather than vertically.

RATIONALE To facilitate presentation of data. Other changes proposed above, if approved, would be incorporated in the revised format.}

Minimum number of Judging Class Title Number of Certificates Panels FS.S 2 Starter 3 HTM.S FS.N 2 Novice 3 HTM.N FS.I 2 Intermediate 3 HTM.I FS.A 2 Advanced 3 HTM.A 7 3 (subsequent to Advanced FS.Ch Title) with aggregate scores of Champion HTM.Ch 160 points or more including at least 3 different pieces of music

4.2.4 Application for title Applications for all titles must be submitted on the appropriate form, accompanied by the prescribed fee. Upon approval by the member body, a title certificate authorising the use of the letters concerned will be issued to the applicant.

4.3 Decisions

4.3.1 Decisions of the Committee of the Affiliate conducting any Dances With Dogs competition shall be subject to appeal to the relevant member body in accordance with the rules of that member body.

4.3.2 The rules of the member body shall apply to any Dances With Dogs competition and to any Affiliate conducting competitions. In the event of any inconsistency, the member body rules shall prevail.

4.3.3 Anyone taking part in a competition who openly impugns the actions or decisions of the Judging Panel shall render themselves liable to be debarred from further participation in the competition and may be ordered from the grounds and further dealt with in accordance with the rules of the relevant member body.

ITEM 16 – RULE 5.1 – RING SIZE

CURRENT RULE

5.0 RINGS

5.1 Except with the approval of the relevant member body, the ring shall be a minimum of 12m by 15m. Dimensions of the ring must be stated in the Schedule.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL 5.1 Except with the approval of the relevant member body, the ring shall be a minimum of 12m by 15m size of 169sq metres with a minimum length of 12 metres. Dimensions of the ring must be stated in the Schedule.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE The current minimum ring size of 12m by 15m provides 180sq metres in a rectangle shaped area. We would like the ring size to be reconsidered as it is extremely difficult to find an appropriate indoor venue which is 15m long. We would suggest a minimum ring size of 169sq metres with a minimum length of 12 metres. This would allow for a 13x13 ring, making it far easier and cost effective to find a suitable indoor venue. We don’t believe that reducing the long side of the ring by 2 metres would be detrimental to the performance of DWD. Ring size is advertised in the Schedule and competitors who do not wish to compete in a slightly smaller ring have the information on which to base their decision. This would assist the ACT in hosting additional, cost-effective indoor DWD events which would assist in increasing membership of the sport. It is noted that the World Canine Freestyle Organisation ring size may be a minimum of 167sq metres.

5.2 Where competitions are held indoors, the floor must have or be covered with a non-slip surface.

5.3 Ropes or markers indicating the ring perimeter must be highly visible to competitors and the Judging Panel and not obscure the Judging Panel’s vision of competitors.

5.4 All ring equipment necessary for the proper conduct of a competition shall be provided by the Affiliate conducting the competition.

5.5 A distance of at least one metre from the ring perimeter is to be cordoned-off. Spectators must remain outside the cordoned area.

5.6 The allocated judging area must be separated from all spectators.

5.7 The ring entrance and competitor assembly area must be kept free from spectators throughout the competition.

ITEM 17 – RULES 5.8 AND 5.9

CURRENT RULES 5.8 Dogs, other than exhibits, must not be within four (4) metres of the competition ring perimeter.

5.9 The ring may be available for access by all competitors and their dogs prior to commencement of the competition, as advised by the Competition Manager or nominee in consultation with the Judging Panel.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL

5.8 Dogs, other than exhibits, must not be within four (4) five (5) metres of the competition ring perimeter.

5.9 The ring may be available for access by all competitors and their dogs prior to commencement of the competition, as advised by the Competition Manager or nominee in consultation with the Judging Panel. Unless otherwise specified, no competitor may enter the ring later than 15 minutes prior to commencement of competition. After that time the ring must not be used for any reason other than actual competition.

No food/training toys/motivators are to be used or taken into/worn in the competition ring at any time.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE 5.8 is consistent with the provisions re exclusion zones in Obedience and Rally O. Where space constraints apply in a particular venue, permission for variation of this requirement can be obtained.

5.9 is clarification/simplification only.

5.10 No dog or handler shall be permitted to enter the competition ring after the Judging Panel has confirmed the suitability of the ring, except for the purpose of competition.

ITEM 18 – RULE 5.11 – MOTIVATORS OUTSIDE RING

CURRENT RULE 5.11 No food, toy or motivator shall be used within 6 metres of the competition ring.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL 5.11 No food, toy or motivator shall be used left within 63 metres of the competition ring.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE We would like the term ‘used’ changed to ‘left’ and the distance changed from 6 metres to 3 metres.  Given the use of generally indoor venues, it is difficult to allocate space where the competitor can still motivate their dog while waiting in the assembly area as this is generally within 6 metres of the ring.  Competitors would currently generally have to leave the assembly area to place their food/toys outside the 6m distance, at times needing to exit the building.  We feel it is important to continue to be able to motive the dog up until entering the ring, particularly where a competitor is called up “at the completion of the previous routine” (6.4.2) and then may be held in the assembly area for some time. We note that DWD is the only sport where a competitor is required to wait in an area for an unknown period and without currently being able to motivate their dog.  The primary concern should always be that any motivator does not cause a distraction to a performing dog. Motivators should only be used at the completion of the previous team’s routine, while waiting to enter the ring.  Logically, we cannot see that food or a toy left 3m from a ring would behave differently in the ring with these same motivators 6m from the ring. The change in distance is not an advantage to a well-trained dog, but may be a disadvantage to a less trained dog who may choose to return to the food/toy; however, competitors always have the choice not to leave items.  We would agree that once in the ring any motivators (food/toys) should not be visible to the dog. This could be dealt with through providing a visual barrier for toys and food and with any remaining food being in a sealed container.  We would also point out that at most competitions, both spectators and judges have access to food and there are no rules preventing a spectator sitting 1m from the front of the ring eating a hot dog.  While the other option would be to not call the competitor to an assembly area, there are several reasons why this is of value as addressed at 6.4.2.  Other sports use smaller distances (Obedience is 5m) and there is generally no waiting time.

DOGS NSW PROPOSAL 5.11 No food, toy or motivator shall be usedleft within 6 metres of the competition ring.

DOGS NSW RATIONALE Competitors are unlikely to use toys or food close to a ring when another is competing (and others would quickly point out their mistake). However, competitors may wish to play with/reward their dogs just before entering the ring and as there will be no one else in the ring

36 2018 DWD MTG – ATTACHMENT 6g at this point, no other dog will be affected/influenced. Since no food or motivators may be left within the area, there is no unfair advantage.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL 5.11 No food, training toy or motivator shall be used within 6 five (5) metres of the competition ring.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE This is consistent with the provisions re exclusion zones in Obedience and Rally O. Where space constraints apply in a particular venue, permission for variation of this requirement can be obtained.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL 5.11 No food, toy or motivator shall be used within 6 five (5) metres of the competition ring.

DOGS SA RATIONALE  In obedience and rally obedience, the distance specified is 5 metres, so this change would make DWD consistent with other sports.  As many DWD competitions are held at indoor venues, this rule change allows more flexibility when organizing floor plans for venues.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL 5.11 No food, toy or motivator shall be used or left within 6 metres of the competition ring. The lead is not to be actively used as a tug toy/motivator in the ring. Exclusion area to be defined by affiliate conducting the competition.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE To stop leaving motivators in sight of the dog. Some dogs are motivated by the sight of such things as food, toys therefore moving them out of sight they are no longer being used as a motivator.

A lead actively used as a tug toy is a kind of motivator, just like a toy, which in principle violates Rule 5.11 itself. No motivator other than a dog’s relationship with its handler is allowed in the ring. This is also so as not to give competitors who train their dogs to tug on the lead an unfair advantage over those who don’t, by actively giving their dog a motivator right before the start of their routine in the ring.

The term “actively” needs to be included to ensure that penalties only apply to competitors who deliberately encourage their dogs to engage with its lead in the ring.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE Rule 11.4. Disqualification.

DOGS WEST PROPOSAL

5.11 No food, toy or motivator shall be usedleft within 6 metres of the competition ring and no food or toy shall be used within 6 metres of the ring until the previous dog has exited the ring.

DOGS WEST RATIONALE Judges are marking the previous dogs score and should not have to split their attention by watching a dog outside the ring. It is logical to not allow toys or food directly outside the ring and the competing dog should not be distracted by the next team to compete.

5.12 No items of any kind shall be thrown by any person into the ring at any time during a competition.

ITEM 19 – RULE 6.1 – ELIGIBILITY OF EXHIBITS – AGE LIMIT CURRENT RULE 6.0 EXHIBIT REQUIREMENTS

6.1 Eligibility of exhibits

Dances with Dogs competitions are open to dogs that are: (a) registered with the relevant member body; (b) 12 months of age or over on the first day of a sanctioned event which includes a Dances with Dogs competition.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL (b) 12 6 months of age or over on the first day of a sanctioned event which includes a Dances with Dogs competition.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE We would like the age reduced to 6 months. DWD offers much greater scope for preparing a dog that is fit, flexible and has been provided with positive training methods. Once a competitor has commenced a sport such as Rally-O or Obedience, in which they can trial with a dog at six months, it is more difficult to bring them into DWD. Additionally, those with young dogs are often keen to join a less ‘strict’ sport and compete, particularly in a sport such as freestyle which allows for motivating behaviours and talking during competition. We understand there would be some concerns over the safety or appropriateness of certain moves or behaviours for young dogs (or with all dogs). This could be addressed under 6.5 Welfare of Dogs, with an additional clause relating to the moves as presented appearing safe. It would be important to limit the definition of ‘safe’ to what is presented on the day – i.e., the dog performed it well, didn’t slip or twist, etc. This should not be based on judges’ biases as to what they feel is suitable or safe as this is impossible to justify without knowing the training history or abilities of the dog.

ITEM 20 – RULE 6.2 - ENTRIES CURRENT RULE

6.2 Entries 6.2.1 All entries must be made on the prescribed entry form and in accordance with the member body rules and the timelines published in the Schedule.

6.2.2 A separate entry form must be submitted for each entry.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL 6.2.1 All entries must be made on the prescribed entry form a form providing the required data as per the example at appendix B and in accordance with the member body rules and the timelines published in the Schedule. 6.2.2 A separate entry form must be submitted for each entry if requested.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE We would like the ‘prescribed’ entry from to be an example rather than the requirement. The form (appendix B) requires substantial transcribing, usually retyping, and is time consuming for the Competition Secretary and prone to errors. Utilising a form comprising tables, particularly if provided as a Word document, allows for a quick copy and paste of all competitor data into an excel database. Rather than a ‘prescribed’ form, this could state, “a form providing the following required data as per the example at appendix B”. Similarly, with the use of modern programs, it is simpler to receive one form for an am/pm competition than two separate forms. This way the Competition Secretary knows that all the information is the same. In receiving two forms, they need to check if the music or length or anything else may be different, again taking more time. The entry form should contain am/pm options and allow for one form if no changes are made from the am to the pm entry. This should be at the discretion of the Club and we suggest the addition of the words “if requested” to provide this option.

6.2.3 A dog may be entered in both Freestyle and Heelwork to Music divisions, but shall be entered in only one class within a division.

6.2.4 A dog with an Intermediate title may only compete in either Intermediate or Advanced class within a division at the one competition.

6.2.5 A dog may be entered in both titling and non-titling classes when the latter are offered by the Affiliate conducting the competition.

6.3 Music and costume

6.3.1 Music in the public domain is acceptable and encouraged, provided it is not offensive or sexually suggestive in language. Competitors may obtain their music by creating it new, purchasing it, or receiving it free. Competitors do not need to hold music licenses for routines entered in member body events1.

1 Responsibility for obtaining music licences will rest with the relevant member body or Affiliate.

ITEM 21 – RULE 6.3.2 – COSTUME

CURRENT RULE 6.3.2 Costume, music and/or routine must not be offensive or sexually suggestive in language or presentation. Violations of this rule shall result in the routine being disqualified. DOGS ACT PROPOSAL 6.3.2 Costume, music and/or routine must not be offensive or sexually suggestive in language or presentation and should be suitable for viewing by the public, i.e., be ‘G’ rated. Violations of this rule shall result in the routine being disqualified.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE The wording around music requires review. Most music is about love/sex, including many choices currently being used for DWD. This means that the music is ‘sexually suggestive’. However, it is also acceptable mainstream music, listened to by children and adults the world over. We believe the word ‘offensive’ is strong enough to cover music that is explicit. A well- known term such as ‘G’ rated could be used.

ITEM 22 – RULE 6.3.3 - FOOTWEAR

CURRENT RULE 6.3.3 Appropriate2 footwear is required to be worn by all handlers in the ring.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL 6.3.3 Appropriate2 footwear is required to be worn by all handlers in the ring.Handlers should wear appropriate and safe attire.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE While we understand that an attempt has been made to enhance the safety of competitors, we feel this is too prescriptive. On an indoor surface on carpet, or even outdoors on grass, bare feet are a very safe option, safer than shoes in many cases. Similarly, there are thongs and scuffs available that are very secure and some people are very used to this footwear. Additionally, they may have a routine which doesn’t involve much handler movement or difficult steps, where either would be suitable. And while ‘scuffs’ have been highlighted, assuming because they have no back closure, this wouldn’t prevent a competitor from wearing clogs or three inch heels, and it may be that heeled dance shoes are in fact appropriate. We feel it would be best to leave what is appropriate footwear to the handler in determining their routine. Should a judge feel that the footwear wasn’t appropriate this could be a deduction or lower costume score. Bare feet on a surface that is a ring suitable for DWD should be allowable and not a deduction at any time. Rather than focussing on footwear, this clause should relate to the safety of handler attire overall.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL 6.3.3 Appropriate2 footwear is required to be worn by all handlers in the ring. Competitors should wear some type of appropriate 2 footwear, that complies with the safety requirements of the Member Body and at the same time complements the costume designed for the routine.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Clarification.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL 6.3.3 Appropriate2 footwear is required to be worn by all handlers in the ring.The onus is on the handler to choose suitable footwear (if any) in the ring.

DOGS SA RATIONALE  Performers in this sport are of varied physical ability and as such, each individual should be responsible for selecting appropriate clothing attire including footwear that does not impede their physical performance or create a hazard to them during their performance and while entering/leaving the ring. Singling our footwear as the only risk is not logical,

2 Excludes thongs, scuffs and bare feet.

since other garments could also be a hazard if inappropriately worn eg tripping over long scarves or flowing dresses.  The current rule limits creativity. Some competitors are ‘forced’ to wear shoes when their routine’s costume would be more appealing without footwear.  Many DWD events are held indoors, so the safety aspects of footwear are not always relevant.

6.3.4 All handlers are responsible for providing the Music Steward with one (1) copy of their music, labelled with competitor’s name, division, class, music selection and duration, at least thirty minutes before commencement of the competition. Music must be in a suitable audio format as specified in the competition schedule.

ITEM 23 – RULE 6.3.5 – MUSIC CHECKS

CURRENT RULE 6.3.5 Music checks will be available at least thirty minutes before commencement of the competition. Handlers are responsible for the quality of recorded material.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL 6.3.5 Music checks will be available at least thirty minutes before commencement of the competition. Handlers are responsible for the quality of recorded material.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Music checks typically commence once vetting opens, but any individual piece of music may not necessarily have been checked 30 minutes before commencement of the competition.

6.3.6 At the discretion of the Affiliate, a competitor may change the details of the music (the music selection/title, duration etc) at the point of registration. Details of the change must be provided to other relevant officials at the competition and be recorded on the marked catalogue submitted to the relevant member body.

6.3.7 Once handlers have provided their music to the Music Steward and the music check has been completed, the music must remain with the Music Steward until completion of at least that class of the competition.

6.3.8 Handlers are responsible for the collection of their music at the end of the competition.

6.4 Registration and attendance

6.4.1 Handlers are responsible for registering their presence with the Secretary or nominee prior to the commencement of the competition, as specified in the Schedule.

ITEM 24 – RULE 6.4.2 – ASSEMBLY AREA, AVAILABILITY IN

CURRENT RULE 6.4.2 The handler and dog shall be in the assembly area at the conclusion of the routine of the competitor prior to them.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL 6.4.2 The handler and dog shall be in the assembly area available to the ring steward at the conclusion of the routine of the competitor prior to them. DOGS ACT RATIONALE DWD is different from other sports with a longer time taken to complete scoring at the conclusion of the performance. As judges are still marking at the conclusion of a routine and, as currently the assembly area is generally within 6 metres of the ring (particularly in indoor venues with limited space), the next competitor is required to wait in the assembly area without motivation for the dog (refer 5.1.1) for several minutes while the judges conclude their scoring. Competitors should not be required to enter the assembly area until the steward is ready to announce them to go into the ring OR, preferably, they should be allowed to use motivators in the assembly area while waiting. The previous competitor should also have exited the ring (and assembly area if that is the through way) before the next competitor is called in. The ring steward is generally aware that the next competitor is available and waiting so there should not be the requirement to be in the assembly area. However, it is often beneficial for the dog to be in the assembly area and take stock of the environment – while being motivated – to ensure the optimal chance of a good performance. Therefore, the preference would be a combination of the suggestions at 5.11 and a shorter waiting period.

6.5 Welfare of Dogs

6.5.1 All handlers whose dogs are entered at a member body sanctioned event shall take all reasonable steps to ensure the needs of their dog are met, and shall not put their dog’s health or welfare at risk by any action, default, omission or otherwise.

6.5.2 Exhibits may be required to be inspected in accordance with the requirements of the relevant member body.

6.6 Bitches in Oestrum

Bitches in oestrum or showing a coloured discharge of any sort shall not be permitted to compete in any competition or to remain within the precincts of the competition venue.

ITEM 25 – RULE 7 – REMOVAL OF DOG

CURRENT RULE 7.0 REMOVAL OF A DOG DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Add an additional sub-rule as follows: 7.1 Competitors are under the jurisdiction of the Judging Panel the entire time they are in the competition ring, not just during the performance of the routine.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Clarification of scope of this rule.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE Renumber subsequent sub-rules.

7.1 Any dog that attacks or displays aggressive behaviour towards any person or another dog shall be removed and disqualified from all competition on the day, and the matter shall be addressed in accordance with the incident reporting procedures of the member body.

CURRENT RULE 7.2 The Judging Panel may order the removal from competition of any dog which is deemed disorderly or unmanageable, any handler who interferes wilfully with another competitor or a competitor’s dog or whose behaviour is objectionable, and shall exclude or order the removal from competition of any dog which the Judging Panel considers unfit to compete.

7.2 The Judging Panel – (a) may order the removal from competition of any dog which is deemed disorderly or unmanageable, or any handler who interferes wilfully with another competitor or a competitor’s dog or whose behaviour is objectionable and (b) shall exclude or order the removal from competition of any dog which the Judging Panel considers unfit to compete

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Clarification through numbering of paragraphs.

8.0 WITHDRAWAL OF A DOG

8.1 A competitor may withdraw a dog before or during judging but, following such withdrawal, that handler/dog team will not be able to take any further part in that class of the competition, unless the Judging Panel, in exceptional circumstances, otherwise approves.

8.2 If, for any reason, a competitor requests that the music be stopped and that they be allowed to leave the ring, then the competitor is regarded as having withdrawn. A competitor who wishes to withdraw must provide a clear indication of this intention to the judges and to the music steward and may not thereafter continue with the routine.

8.3 If a competitor withdraws, no scores will be allocated for any of the scoring categories and the score sheet shall be marked “Withdrawn (W/D)”. If a competitor withdraws, no placing shall be awarded to that entry.

9.0 THE ROUTINE

9.1.1 The standard and quality of the work presented by the handler and dog team should be higher and, shall be judged accordingly, as they progress through the classes. In particular, there should be an increase in achievement levels of content, technical merit and musical interpretation as competitors move into higher level classes.

9.1.2 The routine must start, continue, and finish within the confines of the ring.

ITEM 26 – RULE 9 – THE ROUTINE - DURATION

CURRENT RULE 9.1.3 The duration of a routine must be a minimum of one (1) minute and a maximum of four (4) minutes. It is expected that the duration of routines in the lower class levels will be towards the minimum end of the nominated time and towards the maximum end of the nominated time for routines in the higher classes.

The following guidelines regarding the minimum duration of routines are provided for competitors: Starter minimum of 1 minute Novice minimum of 1 minute 30 seconds Intermediate minimum of 2 minutes 15 seconds Advanced minimum of 3 minutes.

DOGS NSW PROPOSAL 9.1.3 The duration of a routine must be a minimum of one (1) minute and a maximum of four (4) minutes. It is expected that the duration of routines in the lower class levels will be towards the minimum end of the nominated time and towards the maximum end of the nominated time for routines in the higher classes.

The following guidelines regarding the minimum duration of routines are provided for competitors are the minimum duration of routines for each class are the minimum duration of routines for each class. Starter minimum of 1 minute Novice minimum of 1 minute 30 seconds Intermediate minimum of 2 minutes 15 seconds Advanced minimum of 3 minutes.

DOGS NSW RATIONALE The above times are very generous. In each class, a routine of less than the stated times, would rarely contain enough Content (and therefore Technical Merit and Musical Interpretation - you can't judge what isn't there) to qualify in that class. Making the minimum a Rule will assist competitors in making correct choices.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL 9.1.3 The duration of a routine must be a minimum of one (1) minute and a maximum of four (4) minutes. It is expected that the duration of routines in the lower class levels will be towards the minimum end of the nominated time and towards the maximum end of the nominated time for routines in the higher classes.

The following guidelines regarding the minimum duration of routines are provided for competitors: Pre-Starter minimum of 1 minute Starter minimum of 1 minute

Novice minimum of 1 minute 30 seconds Open minimum of 1 minute 30 seconds Intermediate minimum of 2 minutes 15 seconds Advanced minimum of 3 minutes.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE As with the other classes, a time limit guide should be included for the Pre Starter class. As it is supposed to be similar to Starters class, the time limit should be similar to Starters class.

As with the other classes, a time limit guide should be included for the Open class. As Open class is to be achievable for those dogs who have earned their Novice Title but are not yet at Intermediate level standard, the time limit should be similar to Novice class. To have it longer could prevent some dogs from entering who have their Novice title, and therefore reduce the entries in the class by excluding those dogs using Open class as a ‘stepping stone’ from Novice to Intermediate class.

ITEM 27 – RULE 9 – PRESCRIPTIONS RE OPEN CLASS ROUTINES DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL Insert two new sub-rules as follows:

9.1.4 The Freestyle Open Class shall be judged at a similar level to the Novice class and MUST include a Paw touch or bow, a Beg or Up High, a jump or prop retrieve, and a leg weave or grapevine. The routine may also include any other move the handler chooses to include. 9.1.5 The Heelwork to Music Open Class shall be judged at a similar level to the Novice class and the dog MUST demonstrate at least three (3) heelwork positions and move in at least two (2) different directions in at least one (1) heelwork position.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE There would need to be an aspect of Open class to set it aside from the other classes. By specifying a small number of moves, tricks or positions that must be included in the routine, a new dimension is added to both the judging of the creation of an Open routine. The rules need to state what these moves, tricks or positions must be. By offering two options for each requirement, it allows for more dogs to be able to compete in the Open class. For example, if the rules specified a Jump must be included, older dogs or those dog breeds with features that prohibit the performance of a jump would be unable to fulfill the requirements of the Open Class. The above tricks, moves, and heel positions have been selected as they are Novice – upper novice moves. This allows for competitors to use the Open class as a ‘stepping stone’ to Intermediate. To make the compulsory moves or positions at Intermediate level or above, a competition could simply enter Intermediate class. Therefore, moves are set at Novice level, with enough scope to still allow for competitors to create individual routines suited to their dog.

ITEM 28 – RULE 9.2 – DOG ATTIRE – COLLARS, HARNESSES

CURRENT RULE

9.2 Dog attire 9.2.1 Dogs may only wear a decorative/co-ordinated neck collar, scarf and/or a buckle collar, or no collar.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL 9.2.1 Dogs may only wear a decorative/co-ordinated neck collar, scarf and/or a buckle collar, or no collar . Dogs may also wear decorative neck attire so long as this is safe, does not interfere with the dog’s movement or the judges’ view of the dog, and maintains the dignity of the sport.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE This is ambiguous and doesn’t provide clarity as to the purpose of the rule. A scarf could be a winter scarf hanging to the floor or dragging behind the dog and it does not state how a neck collar is different to a collar. It is assumed that the intent of this clause is two-fold: Safety for the dog and maintaining a level of dignity for the sport. Given that all dogs are different and all dogs are comfortable wearing different things, we feel this clause could be more informative by focussing on the intent. We would see this is allowing the use of decorative pieces such as a tie which may hang down to the dog’s mid-chest/sternum, but should in no way impede his movement or safety. I.e, if the dog was to perform a crawl, the piece should not interfere with that movement. This change will allow for clearer chooses by competitors and decisions by judges based on safety and dignity.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL 9.2.1 Dogs may only wear a decorative/co-ordinated neck collar, scarf and/or a buckle collar, or no collar while performing their routine.

DOGS SA RATIONALE  Currently, the rule implies that a dog is restricted in what it can wear in the whole precinct of the competition, while really this rule attempts to control the attire of the dog while it is performing.  Competitors have at times been corrected for walking their dog into the performance ring wearing a harness, when this should not be a problem for the competition or their routine, assuming the dog wears appropriate attire when performing.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL 9.2.1 During the routine, Ddogs may only wear a decorative/co-ordinated neck collar, scarf and/or a buckle fixed collar, or no collar.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE Adding the phrase “During the routine” in Rule 9.2.1 allows a dog to wear a slip collar (as in a sight hound) or a harness (as in a dog with delicate neck) upon entering the ring on lead (Rule 10.6 Page 11) which is to be removed before the start of the routine. In this case the dog will wear no collar during the routine.

CURRENT RULE 9.2.2 Dogs must not wear: (a) any kind of prong, choke, or slip collars (made of chain or any other material); or (b) anything other than mentioned in 9.2.1.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL 9.2.2 Dogs must not wear: (a) any kind of prong, choke, or slip collars (made of chain or any other material); or (b) anything other than mentioned in 9.2.1. Dogs may, when entering and exiting the ring, wear a collar or harness with lead attached, or slip lead.

DOGS SA RATIONALE  There is no need to protect dogs from these devices in this rule, as 10.1 disallows handlers from issuing punitive corrections.  The current rule prevents handlers from using slip leads to enter and exit the ring, which is a useful device for speed and ease, especially for competitors with a number of dogs competing.  When dogs are wearing ‘fancy collars’ for their performance, they are not often suitable for connecting a lead to, and so handlers waste time putting a different lead/collar on and off as they enter the ring.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL 9.2.2 During the routine, dDogs must not wear: (a) any kind of prong, choke, or slip collars (made of chain or any other material); or (b) anything other than mentioned in 9.2.1.

9.2.3. In the precinct of the competition venue, dogs must not wear: any kind of shock, prong or pinch collar (made of chain or any other material).

DOGS VIC RATIONALE The rule as it currently reads does not differentiate between a dog/handler entering the ring on lead and the dog/handler performing their routine. Some dog breeds (such as sight hounds with long necks and narrow faces, or heavily coated breeds with large ruffs of fur

52 2018 DWD MTG – ATTACHMENT 6g around their necks), due to their physical characteristics, make it impractical to use a buckle or flat collar. Many of these breeds use a form of slip collar that is removed with the lead and is not used as a form of correction but as a practical collar/lead for walking.

Additional to this, if this rule was to be enforced as it currently reads, all dogs would need to wear a buckled or clipped flat collar into and out of the ring, increasing the time a handler takes to remove the collar at the beginning of the routine and replace it at the end, especially if they have a long coated breed. Furthermore, the option to wear no collar when it is required that dogs enter and exit the ring ‘on lead’ is ambiguous. The change in wording proposed here will eliminate this ambiguity and have the rule read as it is actually being enforced at current trials.

Adding Rule 9.2.3. makes sure that the Dances With Dogs sport in Australia is consistent with the other countries in promoting that the sport only uses positive reinforcement training methods.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE Renumber Rule 9.2.3 as 9.2.4.

ITEM 29 – RULE 9.2.3 (and new 9.2.4) – DOG ATTIRE – ARTIFICIAL COLOURING and HAIR BANDS

CURRENT RULE 9.2.3 A dog may not be artificially coloured.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL

9.2.3 A dog may not be artificially coloured. To maintain the dignity of the sport, a dog should not be artificially coloured for the purpose of competing.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE Some people choose to colour their dog’s coats or nails or use colour enhancing shampoos. While we agree that a dog should not be coloured for competing, we would expect that it can be more difficult to remove colour prior to a competition. There are also some show dogs competing in DWD using ‘colour’ shampoos to enhance coats which is technically an artificial colour. It is not clear, but we would assume, that this also refers to dogs with coloured nails. We feel that as artificial colouring is not gaining the competitor points and may cause greater difficulty to remove, that this clause should focus on the dignity of the sport, rather than penalise for personal likes. We may lose a potential DWD enthusiast who also likes to paint their dog’s nails!

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Add an additional sub-rule as follows: 9.2.4 A rubber hair band (on the head) for long coated dogs is allowed in order to allow the dog to see clearly. The purpose is primarily to improve visibility of the dog, and the hairband should not be considered decoration.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE The inserted text is based on the FCI Rules and provides clarification which may be beneficial in the case of some long coated breeds.

9.3 Props and other items

If props are used, they must be an integral part of the routine and must be used by the handler and/or dog. Violation of this rule shall result in a one (1) penalty point deduction per prop. No props may be included or removed from the ring once the routine has commenced. Each Judge shall deduct such point(s) in the ‘Deductions’ section on the score sheet.

ITEM 30 – RULE 10 – COMPETING – JURISDICTION OF JUDGING PANEL

CURRENT RULE

10.0 COMPETING DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Add an additional sub-rule as follows: 10.1 Competitors (dogs and handlers) are subject to the jurisdiction of the Judging Panel from the point of entry to the ring to their departure from the ring and the behaviour of both dog and handler is subject to assessment for the duration of their presence in the competition environs.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE: Renumber subsequent sub-rules.

10.1 Any person who carries out punitive correction or harsh handling of any dog at any time within the precincts of the competition venue shall be reported and dealt with under the member body rules.

ITEM 31 – RULE 10 – COMPETING – COMMANDS/CUES

CURRENT RULE

10.2 Verbal commands and/or encouragement may be provided by the handler to the dog and shall not be penalised at any level. Physical touch as encouragement or reward before or after completion of a routine shall not be penalised at any level.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL 10.2 Verbal commands and/or encouragement may be provided by the handler to the dog and shall not be penalised at any level. Physical touch as encouragement or reward before or after completion of a routine Verbal praise and/or some physical touch as encouragement or reward may be provided so long as this does not detract from the overall choreography. Such encouragement shall not be penalised at any level.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE This clause currently states that physical touch as encouragement or reward before or after completion of a routine shall not be penalised at any level. However, it currently does not allow this during the routine. We would like to see this clause brought into line with the sport of Rally Obedience where ‘patting’ of the dog is permitted for praise during the course. We feel this change would allow Starter and Novice competitors particularly to provide further positive encouragement to and connection with their dogs. It would also allow competitors at higher levels to use touch as encouragement, particularly with older dogs who are no longer able to hear or even see as well. Obviously, this needs to be balanced with presenting a routine where stopping and patting after each behaviour would detract from the overall picture. Should this become excessive, this would likely be reflected in the scoring under Musical Interpretation, particularly items i and ii. However, we would rather see an engaged and happy dog competing. We would also like to see the word ‘command’ replaced by ‘praise’.

DOGS NSW PROPOSAL 10.2 Verbal commands and/or encouragement may be provided by the handler to the dog and shall not be penalised at any level. Physical touch as encouragement or reward before or after completion of a routine shall not be penalised at any level. During a routine, where the same behaviour is being repeated in a continuous sequence, the Handler is permitted to repeat any cue as a keep going signal, provided the dog is clearly performing the behaviour cued. Repeating a cue due to the dog's refusal or inattention must be penalised.

DOGS NSW RATIONALE There is no direction within the Rules that indicate that competitors may cue their dogs in any way and using any words they choose. Unfortunately some believe that Rally O and Obedience Rules apply. Therefore this Rule would clarify the position.

10.2 Verbal commands and/or encouragement may be provided by the handler to the dog and shall not be penalised at any level.

10.2.1 When during a routine a move is required to be repeated, the handler may repeat the chosen cue provided that the dog is obviously performing the behaviour cued. Repeating a cue due to the dog's refusal or inattention is to be penalised.

10.2.2 Physical touch as encouragement or reward before or after completion of a routine shall not be penalised at any level.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE What word to use as a “keep going signal” is a matter of preference and a competitor is not to be penalised if he/she prefers to use the same cue used to acquire a behaviour as a keep going signal. If the competitor clearly repeats a cue due to the dog not performing the behaviour asked then this is to be penalised.

10.3 After a dog has commenced competing in a class, no substitution of handler is permitted in that class.

10.4 Handlers with disabilities may compete, provided such handlers can move about the ring without physical assistance. The use of a wheelchair, crutches or cane is acceptable. The dog is to perform all necessary requirements of their routine as stated in these rules.

10.5 At the Judging Panel’s discretion, if a dog’s performance was prejudiced by peculiar or unusual conditions, the Panel may re-judge the entire routine.

ITEM 32 – RULE 10.6 – COMPETING – USE OF LEAD

CURRENT RULE

10.6 For the duration of the competition, all dogs must be on a lead (or otherwise restrained [e.g. in a crate]) except when competing or practising prior to the competition. Dogs will enter and leave the competition ring on lead under the control of the handler. At any point after entering the ring, the competitor may remove the lead and hand it to the ring steward who will return it to the handler on completion of the routine.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL 10.6 For the duration of the competition, all dogs must be on a lead (or otherwise restrained [e.g. in a crate]) except when competing or practising prior to the competition. Dogs will enter and leave the competition ring on lead under the control of the handler. At any point after entering the ring, the competitor may remove the lead and hand it to the ring steward who will return it to the handler, inside the ring, on completion of the routine.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Minor clarification and renumbering consequential on addition of sub-rule 10.1.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL 10.6 For the duration of the competition, all dogs must be on a lead (or otherwise restrained [e.g. in a crate]) except when competing or practising prior to the competition. Dogs will enter and leave the competition ring on lead under the control of the handler. At any point after entering the ring, the competitor may shall remove the lead and hand it to the ring steward who will return it to the handler on completion of the routine. A dog who exits the competition ring off lead at any time may be penalised, up to disqualification, in accordance with Rule 7 and Rule 11.4.1.b.

DOGS SA RATIONALE  Part a: As it currently stands, it is within the rules for a competitor to complete their whole routine while on lead. This is not in competing with the nature of an appealing spectator sport, nor is it the manner in which DWD competitions have been run in the country.  Part b: By adding the last line it is hoped to clarify confusion that has arisen regarding the penalty in place for dogs that leave the ring before and after performance of their routine but whilst they are in the ring area. Dogs that leave the ring off lead pose a safety hazard and can be very disruptive to competitors about to enter the ring. Though the current rule is clear that dogs must be on lead, it is not clear what the appropriate penalty is. The only penalty explanation currently in force is 11.4.1 (b) “the dog and/or handler leaving the ring at any time during their routine;” This does not cover the time spent in the ring before and after their performance.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE Somewhat: 11.4.1 (b) – see next section.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL 10.6 For the duration of the competition, all dogs must be on a lead (or otherwise restrained [e.g. in a crate]) except when competing or practising prior to the competition. Dogs will enter and leave the competition ring on lead and/or harness/collar/slip lead (not made of chain), under the control of the handler. At any point after entering the ring, the competitor may remove the lead and/or harness/collar or slip lead and hand it to the ring steward who will return it make it availableto the handler on completion of the routine, with the exception of the Pre-Starter Class, where the handler may choose for the dog to remain on lead throughout the routine.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE To allow the use of harnesses and slip leads when entering and leaving the rings. Slip leads are more appropriate for long haired dogs. The Rules state that dogs must perform off lead, the pre Starter class is an on lead class, therefore this exception needs to be listed as an on lead performance, not an off lead performance.

DOGS VICTORIA ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL 10.6 For the duration of the competition, all dogs must be on a lead (or otherwise restrained [e.g. in a crate]) except when competing or practising prior to the competition. Dogs will enter and leave the competition ring on a lead attached to a fixed/slip collar or harness under the control of the handler. At any point after entering the ring, the competitor may remove the lead and any attire other than mentioned in 9.2 and hand it to the ring steward who will return it to the handler on completion of the routine.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE This is to clarify that the combination of a fixed collar and a lead is not only form of restraint allowed going into the ring. A dog can also wear a slip collar or a harness to attach its lead to provided that they are removed before the start of the routine to satisfy the requirements under Section 9.2.1 Dog Attire.

The need to include this phrase “on a lead attached to a fixed/slip collar or harness” arises because under the current rulebook there have been incidences where a judge told the trial secretary to warn competitors that a harness or slip collar are not mentioned in the rulebook Section 9.2.1 Dog Attire, hence is subject to disqualification under Section 11.4.1. if used to take a dog into the ring.

------RULES CONTINUE 10.7 The competition Secretary will allocate handlers a competition number for each entry submitted. Handlers are not required to wear numbers during competition. Numbers and names of the handler and dog, together with other relevant information, will be listed in the competition catalogue and the name of the handler and dog will normally be announced as they enter the ring. Other on-site displays of names of competitors and their dogs are permissible.

ITEM 33 – RULE 11 – JUDGES AND JUDGING – JUDGING PANEL

CURRENT RULE

11.0 JUDGES AND JUDGING

11.1 Composition of Judging Panels

11.1.1 Each class in a titling Dances with Dogs competition will be judged by a Judging Panel comprised of three licensed Judges.

11.1.2 Persons participating in a Judging Panel at any titling Dances with Dogs competition must have been approved by the relevant member body for judging at the relevant level.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Add the following sub-rule: 11.1.3 The Judging Panel will nominate one of its members as Head Judge for that competition.

If during the competition any incident occurs which is not dealt with in these Rules or the Rules of the Member Body, the Head Judge shall decide how to proceed or how to evaluate the incident. The Head Judge may negotiate the matter with the Judging Panels before making a decision. The Head Judge’s decision is final and no competitor shall impugn that decision.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE This change, which reflects the FCI Rules, authorises the appointment and clarifies the role of the Head Judge. This is already being done in principle at many competitions.

ITEM 34 – RULE 11.2 – JUDGES’ MARKING CRITERIA CURRENT RULE 11.2 Judges’ marking criteria

Each judge will mark all three sections of the Judging criteria as follows:

(a) Routine Content – 20 points (i) The routine is varied with no excessive repetition of moves, befitting the class entered. (ii) Degree of difficulty in respect of the type of moves. (iii) Teamwork displays harmony, a strong relationship and enjoyment between dog and handler.

(b) Technical Merit – 20 points (i) Accuracy of the moves and the dog’s speed in responding; a smooth flow from one move to the next by both handler and dog. (ii) Quality of moves and the extent of mistakes and/or refusals. (iii) Accuracy of heelwork (Heelwork to Music division only). (iv) The dog works in a natural and willing manner.

(c) Musical Interpretation – 20 points (i) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in changes and moves. (ii) Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept. (iii) Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes balance, structure, and design and makes best use of available space. (iv) Costume enhances interpretation of the routine.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL (a) Routine Content – 20 -30 points (i) The routine is varied with no excessive repetition of moves, befitting the class entered. (ii) Degree of difficulty in respect of the type of moves. (iii) Teamwork displays harmony, a strong relationship and enjoyment between dog and handler. (b) Technical Merit – 2030 points (i) Accuracy of the heelwork/positions /moves and the dog’s speed in responding; a smooth flow from one move to the next by both handler and dog. (ii) Quality of moves and the extent of mistakes and/or refusals. (iii) Accuracy of heelwork (Heelwork to Music division only). (iv) The dog works in a natural and willing manner. (c) Musical Interpretation – 2040 points (i) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in changes and moves. (ii) Movements and styling/theming (costume/props) are complementary to the routine’s concept. (iii) Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes balance, structure, and design and makes best use of available

space. (iv) Costume enhances interpretation of the routine.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE Consideration should be given to the current scoring system for DWD. We believe it would be easier to score if it was out of 100. We strongly feel that the separate criteria included in the current score sheet should be retained as this provides valuable feedback to competitors. It is not often feasible for competitors to seek clarification or feedback from judges and the current components of the scoresheet allow them to understand their strengths and weaknesses and areas where they need to focus for improvement. Removing this information would reduce a valuable form of communication while also placing greater pressure on judges to potentially see several competitors and provide individual feedback. If these were to be consolidated into just the main category as we believe is being proposed by some, we feel another mechanism would be required to give feedback to competitors. Otherwise it would be akin to entering an obedience trial and not knowing where you lost points. The following points are made in favour of a revised score system:

CURRENT ( / 60) PROPOSED ( / 100)

Currently we have just 15 points difference Would provide 25 points between a pass and (45 pass, 60 perfect score) between the super routine (75 pass, 100 perfect score). most amazing routine ever and a ‘just pass’. This then requires giving half points (or less!) to better differentiate or reflect what we see and which also makes adding up generally take longer for both judges and the score stewards.

Overall Score: Currently 20/20/20 to come to Proposed: 30/30/40 to come to 100. 60

Currently the first item listed in each category We believe they are all equally important. It is is given the most importance – scored out of also difficult enough for competitors to ensure 10 - and the second two out of 5. Why is one they cover all three bases, without having to seen as more important, i.e., is the accuracy worry about nuances. more important than the quality of a move? The categories and sub-categories are important to provide competitors with information on their routine and points for improvement.

Several items allocated just 5 points - trying 10 per item across the board for Content and to take away points where there have been a Technical subcategories will be easier to couple of missed cues or a refusal is also score. At 10 points there is greater scope to very difficult. Half points or ¼ points are then take a couple of points off without leaving a used and all these fractions become very low score or resorting to fractions. increasingly difficult to add up.

Musical Interpretation: Currently 6/6/6/2 Proposed: 15/10/10. To get to 100, an extra 10 points is allocated in Musical Interpretation - in Freestyle/HTM this is the differentiating factor, so it is valid that this category is higher. Costume has been incorporated into the

routine concept, as well as props and movements, becoming about the overall style or theming of the routine. This also addresses concerns on having to ‘dress up’ to receive a costume score.

Currently a pass is Out of a 100, a pass would be: To be awarded a Qualifying Certificate, a To be awarded a Qualifying Certificate, a competitor must gain the following from at competitor must gain the following from at least two of the three judges: least two of the three judges: (a) a score of at least ten (10) points in each (a) at least 50% in each category (15/15/20); of the three (3) judging categories; and and (b) a total score of at least forty-five (45) (b) a total score of at least 75 points points.

This would be one less difficult thing as most Difficult for newcomers to understand scoring people are familiar with scores out of 100 and process – three judges, category passes, a 75% pass score. individual judge passes, overall pass.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Each judge will mark all three sections of the Judging criteria as follows:

(a) Routine Content – 20 points (i) The routine is varied with no excessive repetition of moves, befitting the class entered. (ii) Degree of difficulty in respect of the type of moves. (iii) Teamwork displays harmony, a strong relationship and enjoyment between dog and handler. (i) Variety of moves/ positions. (ii) Degree of difficulty in respect of the type of moves/positions.

(b) Technical Merit – 20 points (i) Accuracy of the moves and the dog’s speed in responding; a smooth flow from one move to the next by both handler and dog. (ii) Quality of moves and the extent of mistakes and/or refusals. (iii) Accuracy of heelwork (Heelwork to Music division only). (iv) The dog works in a natural and willing manner. (i) Accuracy of positions/ moves; the extent of mistakes and/or refusals. (ii) Fluency of dog’s response to cues; smoothness of transitions from one move/position to the next by both dog and handler.

(c) Musical Interpretation – 20 points (i) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in changes and moves. (ii) Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept. (iii) Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes balance, structure, and design and makes best use of available space. (iv) Costume enhances interpretation of the routine. (i) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in changes and moves. Apparent and flowing choreography and use of available space.

(ii) Level of teamwork, harmony and relationship demonstrated between the dog and handler. Natural and willing manner of working demonstrated by the dog. (iii) Extent to which costume and props (if any) are appropriate to and enhance the routine.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE The elements relating to teamwork and do not readily fit within the categories of Content and Technical Merit respectively. It is suggested that they be retained (with slight modification of wording) but included under Musical Interpretation.

The remaining criteria under Routine Content and Technical Merit simplify the existing statements of requirements but retain the existing allocation of points; consistency of grammar is also addressed.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL Amend paragraph (c) Musical Interpretation as follows:

(c) Musical Interpretation – 20 points (i) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in changes and moves. (ii) Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept, either as a dance ensemble or storytelling. (iii) Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes balance, structure, and design and makes best use of available space. (iv) Costume enhances interpretation of the routine. (v) Spectator appeal.

DOGS SA RATIONALE Paragraph (ii): In the current global trend where storytelling seems to be favoured over dance ensemble (with no obvious story to tell) in routines in international competitions like Crufts and the Open European Championship), a clarification that dance ensemble and storytelling are equally acceptable in the Australian rulebook is needed as a clear statement that no bias is applied toward any of the two choreography styles.

Paragraph (v):  While sections 1.3 “Dances with Dogs has its foundation in traditional obedience heelwork. However, in the discipline of Dances with Dogs, the inclusion of innovative and creative moves, and movement in time to and interpretation of the music are expected.” and section 1.4 “The discipline requires a good rapport between dog and handler, reflected in a high level of teamwork.” are well covered by the Judges Marking Criteria. However, section 1.5 “Dances with Dogs performances should have spectator appeal” is not covered in the criteria. That is, these expectations are listed in the rules, but not reflected in the mark sheet.  The intention of this amendment is to encourage competitors to put more consideration into producing a routine that is entertaining to watch as a spectator, bringing it in line with the intentions of the sport (1.5). As it stands, it is possible to perform a technically accurate routine, with sufficient content that achieves a reasonable score but is actually not very engaging.  There is currently nowhere on the judges’ mark sheet to reflect spectator appeal in a routine.  The changes to scores for other categories under “Musical Interpretation” have been made in order to compensate for this new mark category. This has the added benefit of being out of 5 marks, which is easier for judges to calculate.

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE: Appendix A – inclusion in marks sheet.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL Amend paragraph (c) Musical Interpretation as follows:

(c) Musical Interpretation – 20 points (i) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in changes and moves. (ii) Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept, either as a dance ensemble or storytelling. (iii) Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes balance, structure, and design and makes best use of available space. (iv) Costume enhances interpretation of the routine.

DOGS VIC RATIONALE In the current global trend where storytelling seems to be favoured over dance ensemble (with no obvious story to tell) in routines in international competitions like Crufts and the Open European Championship (see the Table below as an illustration from Crufts), a clarification that dance ensemble and storytelling are equally acceptable in the Australian rulebook is needed as a clear statement that no bias is applied toward any of the two choreography styles.

Routine Style Crufts 2017 Placings Breakdown Day 1 7 Storytelling 1st Storytelling Freestyle 3 Dance Ensemble 2nd Storytelling 3rd Storytelling 4th Storytelling

Day 3 Int’l 8 Storytelling 1st Dance Ensemble Freestyle 1 Mixed 2nd Storytelling - equal score with 1st place 5 Dance Ensemble 3rd Storytelling 4th Dance Ensemble

Day 2 4 Storytelling 1st Storytelling Heelwork To 6 Dance Ensemble 2nd Storytelling Music 3rd Dance Ensemble 4th Dance Ensemble

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE The judge’s mark score sheet in Appendix A needs to be changed accordingly:

DOGS WEST PROPOSAL

Amend paragraph (c) Musical Interpretation and add new paragraph (d) Costume as follows:

(c) Musical Interpretation – 2018 points (i) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in changes and moves.

(ii) Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept. (iii) Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes balance, structure, and design and makes best use of available space.

(d) Costume enhances interpretation of the routine. – 2 Points

DOGS WEST RATIONALE There is no need for each score sheet to break down to a judge how to mark, it is not necessary in any other sport and once judges have been through judges training they should be aware of how to mark each section It is important to leave the costume points separate as the musical interpretation mark should not be elevated by flamboyant costumes

CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE The judge’s mark score sheet in Appendix A needs to be changed accordingly:

11.3 Penalties

11.3.1 The penalties referred to in this rule relate to a deduction from the total score awarded by each individual Judge.

11.3.2 Barking may incur a penalty of up to four (4) points, provided that barking which is cued and is obviously part of a routine shall incur no penalty. Continuous barking shall result in disqualification.

11.3.3 Inclusion in the performance of a prop which is not integral to, and used by the handler and/or dog during the routine shall incur a penalty of 1 point per prop.

ITEM 35 – RULE 11.3 – PENALTIES – CORRECTION CURRENT RULE 11.3.4 Physical management or manipulation of the dog during the routine shall incur a penalty up to disqualification, according to the level of management/ manipulation undertaken.

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL 11.3.4 Physical management or manipulation of the dog during the routine or harsh verbal commands or corrections in the competition ring shall incur a penalty up to disqualification, according to the level of management/manipulation or harsh verbals undertaken.

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Changed for consistency with Rule 11.4. It clarifies that harsh verbal commands/corrections shall also incur a penalty. It is also consistent with FCI Rules.

ITEM 36 – RULE 11.4 – DISQUALIFICATION

11.4. Disqualification

11.4.1 The following shall result in disqualification of the dog and handler and their immediate removal from the ring: (a) a dog fouling/eliminating at any point between entering and exiting the ring;

CURRENT RULE (b) the dog and/or handler leaving the ring at any time during their routine; if a dog or handler accidentally steps outside the ring during a routine they will not be penalised;

DOGS SA PROPOSAL (b) the dog and/or handler leaving the ring at any time during their routine while off lead; however if a dog or handler accidentally steps outside the ring during a routine they willmay not be penalised; DOGS SA RATIONALE  Broaden the criteria for disqualification beyond just the dog leaving the ring during the routine, but also if the dog bolts out of the ring before or after the routine has started.  Substituting in the word ‘may’ instead of ‘will’ allow judges to determine a penalty as fitting to the competitor and the level they are competing at.

------RULES CONTINUE (c) harsh or punitive treatment of the dog in the competition ring;

CURRENT RULE (d) excessive physical manipulation of the dog in the competition ring;

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL (d) excessive any deliberate physical manipulation of the dog in the competition ring;

DOGS VIC RATIONALE To allow for accidental manipulation of the dogs

CURRENT RULE (e) any violation of the rules relating to dog attire or adornment, including artificial colouring;

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL

(e) any violation of the rules relating to dog attire or adornment, including artificial colouring handler or dog attire that is a safety concern; DOGS ACT RATIONALE Refer 6.3.3, 9.2.1 and 9.2.3 re footwear, adornment and colouring. Disqualification should only occur for reasons of safety.

------RULES CONTINUE (f) costume, music, or routine offensive or sexually suggestive in language or presentation; (g) (i) using a real or replica weapon3 of any kind; (ii) using any prop in a manner which simulates or portrays threatening, attacking, injuring or otherwise harming the dog or any person, or other violence or aggression;

CURRENT RULE (iii) using live or recorded weaponry or explosive sounds4;

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL Amend footnote 4 to read:

All music/sounds must be orchestral, or instrumental or vocal in origin.

CURRENT RULE (h) use of, or having on the person of the handler, during a performance, any food, toy or motivator of any kind;

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL (h) use of, or having on the person of the handler, during a performance, any food, toy or motivator physical marker device of any kind

DOGS ACT RATIONALE The inclusion of ‘motivator’ in this clause is very subjective and relies on a good knowledge of the dog. For example, a jingly sound may be very motivating to one dog and another may have had to be desensitised to the same. Additionally, the use of a platform, jump or retrieved item, or any prop where the dog has been positive (reward) trained or generally likes the behaviour is technically a motivator, as is the handler and cues.

3 Toy weapons may be used 4 All music/sounds must be orchestral or instrumental in origin.

We therefore feel the term motivator leaves the scope too open. We feel this clause really relates to the handler inadvertently or purposefully taking items into the ring to assist in the dog’s performance. This clause should be reworded to: “use of …. any food, toy or physical marker device”. It is noted that this does not prevent a handler from using marker words or sounds in the ring. This then leaves an issue that needs to be addressed of a dog being over aroused by the use of a prop or piece of costume, i.e., tugging excessively/not letting go or continuously wanting to interact with the prop when not cued. We don’t feel this warrants disqualification. This type of issue should be addressed with a lower score in ‘Technical Merit’, however, it could be included as a specific item under penalties.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL (h) use of, or having on the person of the handler, during and right before a performance in the ring, any food, toy or motivator of any kind;

DOGS VIC RATIONALE See rationale for change to 5.11.

(i) use of any human or animal prop; (j) continuous barking;

CURRENT RULE (k) a routine which significantly contravenes the time specified in rule 9.1.3.

DOGS ACT PROPOSAL

(k) a routine which significantly contravenes the time specified in rule 9.1.3 is 30 seconds over the following allowed times for Starters 1:00-2:00 minutes, Novice 1:30-3 minutes, Intermediate 2-3:30 minutes and Advanced 2:30-4 minutes.

DOGS ACT RATIONALE This is currently ambiguous. Rule 9.1.3 only states a minimum time of 1 minute and a maximum time of 4 minutes. Therefore, disqualification would only apply to routines ‘significantly’ over 4 minutes. If this is the intent, then ‘significantly’ should be defined – i.e., more than 10% over? (which would be 4m 32s). However, it is understood that this clause should be applied to excessive times for all levels, i.e., that a Starters routine should not go for 3 or 4 minutes. It is noted that times for the levels at Rule 9.1.3 are currently provided as guidelines. These could become rules, including maximum times, which would then provide the basis for rule 11.4.1(k). However, this may be seen as being overly prescriptive.

If specific timings are implemented, we feel that 1-2 minutes would be appropriate for starters. For Novice, Intermediate and Advanced, a variation of up to 90 seconds would be appropriate, i.e., Novice 1:30-3 minutes, Intermediate 2-3:30 minutes and Advanced 2:30-4 minutes. The ‘significant contravening time’ could then be applied across the board at either 10% or, preferably, a straight 30 seconds.

11.4.2 If a competitor is disqualified, the score sheet must be marked “Disqualified (D/Q)”.

11.5 Marks and placings

11.5.1 The results for each class, including marks and Judge’s name, must be displayed on the day and be accessible to all competitors.

11.5.2 The aggregate score (the sum of all Judges’ marking) will determine placings. Qualifying scores take precedence over non-qualifying scores for placings.

ITEM 37 – RULE 11.5.3 – MARKS AND PLACINGS – TIED SCORES

CURRENT RULE:

11.5.3 In the event of a tied score, a decision will be on the following criteria: (a) Highest total score for Technical Merit; if scores remain tied, use criterion (b). (b) Highest score for Routine Content; if scores remain tied, use criterion (c). (c) Highest score for Musical Interpretation; if scores remain tied; (d) Determined at the discretion of the Judging Panel.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL 11.5.3 In the event of a tied score for Heelwork to Music, a decision will be on the following criteria: (a) Highest total score for Technical Merit; if scores remain tied, use criterion (b). (b) Highest score for Routine Content; if scores remain tied, use criterion (c). (c) Highest score for Musical Interpretation; if scores remain tied; (d) Determined at the discretion of the Judging Panel.

11.5.4 In the event of a tied score for Freestyle, a decision will be on the following criteria: (a) Highest total score for Musical Interpretation; if scores remain tied, use criterion (b). (b) Highest score for Routine Content; if scores remain tied, use criterion (c). (c) Highest score for Technical Merit; if scores remain tied; (d) Determined at the discretion of the Judging Panel.

DOGS SA RATIONALE

 As Freestyle requires more creative moves & gestures & expressive choreography that interprets the music, the tied markings should be reflected through Musical Interpretation.  This scoring further differentiates the two classes of Dances with Dogs, which is helpful to competitors, judges, and spectators.

ITEM 38 – APPENDIX A – JUDGES’ MARK SHEET CURRENT APPENDIX A

DANCES WITH DOGS JUDGES’ MARK SHEET

Club Date

Competitor number Starter  Category Freestyle  Class NoviceHTM  Intermediate  Judge Advanced  Judge’s Signature

Maximum Score Judging category points available

Routine Content (Max 20) The routine should be varied with no excessive repetition of moves, befitting the category entered 10

Degree of difficulty in respect of the type of moves 5

Teamwork displays harmony, a strong relationship and enjoyment between 5 dog and handler

Technical Merit (Max 20)

Accuracy of the heelwork/positions/moves and the dog’s speed in responding; 10 a smooth flow from one move to the next by both handler and dog

The quality of moves and the extent of mistakes and /or refusals 5

The dog works in a natural and willing manner 5

Musical Interpretation (Max 20) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in 6 changes and moves Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept 6

Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes 6 balance, structure, design and makes best use of the available space

Costume is appropriate to and enhances the routine 2 Sub Total Deductions

DOGS NSW PROPOSAL New Rule: Each judging category has a total of 20 available points. Judges award points in accordance with the guidelines in the rules: 11.2. (refer to Appendix A (a) - attached)

Club Date

Routine Content (Max 20) The routine should be varied with no excessive repetition of moves, befitting the category class entered 20 Degree of difficulty in respect of the type of moves Teamwork displays harmony, a strong relationship and enjoyment between dog and handler

Technical Merit (Max 20) Accuracy of the heelwork/positions/moves and the dog’s speed in responding; a smooth flow from one move to the next by both handler and dog 20 The quality of moves and the extent of mistakes and /or refusals The dog works in a natural and willing manner

Musical Interpretation (Max 20) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in changes and moves

Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept 20 Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes balance, structure, design and makes best use of the available space Costume is appropriate to and enhances the routine (Maximum 2 points) Sub Total Deductions

60 TOTAL Comments

DOGS NSW RATIONALE Obedience judges give an overall score for each section: for heeling, for the Recall, for the Retrieve etc. They are not required to score separately every element of each section ( eg the

74 2018 DWD MTG – ATTACHMENT 6g dog's focus and attention in heeling, the quality of the turns, the speed of response and accuracy of positions, etc, etc. ) They score the performance as a whole.

Scoring the categories as an entity will give DWD judges more scope to judge each Routine as it affects them, as they see the whole performance. Often judges see a routine as deserving of a certain mark but with the present restrictions placed on them as to how many marks they must award for each element, the final score may not reflect what the judge feels the Routine deserves. (Judges are mindful of competitors feelings and the fact that everyone can view the score sheets - it's hard to give a mark of 1 out of 5, even if one feels that Degree of difficulty deserves this; so much fairer to see this category as deserving 14 out of 20! and "movements are complementary to the routines concept"? 4, or what, out of 6? but overall deserving 15 out of 20, so how do I score each part?, where do I put the points? )

The guidelines remain to remind and help the judge with scoring. It will speed up the process and may eliminate errors in addition. Eliminating the points breakdown will result in a much fairer result for all competitors. Other countries are not so restrictive with regard to scoring. They judge each category as a whole entity. Consequential changes: APPENDIX A Judges Score Sheet ( refer Appendix A Original and Appendix A (a) Musical Interpretation: Costume - 2 points maximum

DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL JUDGES’ MARK SHEET

Club Date

Maximum Score Sub- Judging category points total available

Routine Content (Max 20) The routine should be varied with no excessive repetition of moves, - befitting the category entered Variety of moves/positions 10 - Degree of difficulty in respect of the type of moves/positions 510

Teamwork displays harmony, a strong relationship and enjoyment 5 between dog and handler - Sub-total Routine Content

Technical Merit (Max 20) Accuracy of the heelwork/positions/moves and the dog’s speed in - responding; a smooth flow from one move to the next by both handler 10 and dog

The quality of moves and the eExtent of mistakes and /or refusals 5 - The dog works in a natural and willing mannerFluency of dog’s 5 - response to cues Smoothness of transitions from one move/position to the next by both dog and handler

Sub-total Technical Merit - Musical Interpretation (Max 20) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music 610 - in changes and moves. Apparent and flowing choreography and use of the available space Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept 6

76 2018 DWD MTG – ATTACHMENT 6g horeography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes 68 - balance, structure, design and makes best use of the available space Level of teamwork, harmony and relationship demonstrated between the dog and handler Natural and willing manner of working demonstrated by the dog

Extent to which costume and props (if any) areCostume is appropriate to 2 - and enhances the routine

Sub-total Musical Interpretation - Sub Total - Deductions -

- TOTAL

DOGS QLD RATIONALE Revised, consequential upon proposed change to Rule 11.

An extra column has been added to the right of the Score column in which to record the sub- totals for each category. This way, the sub-totals will be more obvious and not buried among the scores for each criterion. This should help both judges and score stewards when calculating/checking the total score.

DOGS SA PROPOSAL JUDGES’ MARK SHEET

Club Date

Maximum Score Judging category points available Routine Content (Max 20) The routine should be varied with no excessive repetition of moves, befitting the category entered 10

Musical Interpretation (Max 20) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in 65 changes and moves Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept either as a dance 65 ensemble or storytelling

Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes 65 balance, structure, design and makes best use of the available space

Costume is appropriate to and enhances the routine 2

Spectator appeal 3 Sub Total Deductions

DOGS SA RATIONALE See rationale under changes to Rule 11.2.

DOGS VICTORIA PROPOSAL JUDGES’ MARK SHEET

Club Date

Routine Content (Max 20) The routine should be varied with no excessive repetition of moves, befitting the category entered 10

Musical Interpretation (Max 20) Interpretation of the music, reflecting rhythm and phrasing of the music in 6 changes and moves Movements are complementary to the routine’s concept either as a dance 6 ensemble or storytelling Choreography is apparent and flowing. The routine includes 6 balance, structure, design and makes best use of the available space

Costume is appropriate to and enhances the routine 2 Sub Total Deductions

DOGS VIC RATIONALE See rationale under changes to Rule 11.2.

DOGS WEST PROPOSAL JUDGES’ MARK SHEET

CLUB DATE

COMPETITOR NUMBER Starter  CATEGORY Freestyle  CLASS NoviceHTM  Intermediate  JUDGE Advanced  JUDGE’S SIGNATURE

MAX POINTS SCORE JUDGING CATEGORY AVAIL.

ROUTINE CONTENT (Max 20)

ROUTINE VARIATION, DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY, TEAMWORK 20

TECHNICAL MERIT (Max 20)

ACCURACY AND SPEED RESPONSE, QUALITY OF MOVES, DOGS 20 WILLINGNESS TO WORK

MUSICAL INTERPRETATION (Max 18)

CHOREOGRAPHY IS APPARENT AND FLOWING, MOVEMENTS AND 18 INTERPRETATION COMPLIMENT THE ROUTINES CONCEPT

COSTUME (Max 2)

COSTUME IS APPROPRIATE TO AND ENHANCES THE ROUTINE 2

SUB TOTAL

DEDUCTIONS

DOGS WA RATIONALE See rationale under changes to Rule 11.2.

ITEM 39 – APPENDIX B - CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS APPENDIX B {The following submissions have recommended changes to Appendix B:  Rule 2 – definition of Freestyle – Dogs SA and Dogs Vic;  Rule 6.2.1 – Dogs ACT.}

OFFICIAL DANCES WITH DOGS ENTRY FORM (ENCOMPASSING FREESTYLE AND HEELWORK TO MUSIC) To be held under the Rules and Regulations of the State Member Body Note: Writing must be in ink, and all names of dogs and owners must be in block letters. Use a separate form for each entry. ______Club Date of Competition / / (Name of club for which entry is made)

EXHIBITOR’S DECLARATION I hereby apply to enter the following exhibit in terms of and upon the conditions set out in the State/Territory member body’s Constitution Rules and Regulations by which I agree to be bound, and I hereby certify to the correctness of the particulars endorsed hereon.

BREED ______

NAME OF EXHIBIT______Details of dog entered must be identical with the registration of the Canine Control with which the dog is registered Date of Birth ______Sex ______Registered No______State D or B Name of Registered Owner/Lessee______(Mr, Mrs, Ms, Miss - BLOCK LETTERS please)

______Membership No______Postal Address______Post Code ______Phone ______Email______Name of handler (if different from owner/lessee):______

Entered in Freestyle  Starters Novice Intermediate Advanced Please √ HTM      Title of Music ______Artist______Duration of Music______Minutes & ______Seconds CD  USB or other*  I certify that this exhibit has not within a period of three months been in kennels affected with Distemper, Canine Hepatitis, Parvo Virus or any other contagious or infectious disease and that the dog has been vaccinated. Usual Signature of owner/lessee(s)______Entry Fees ______Catalogue ______Sundries ______Total ______Cheque No.______

*If permitted in accordance with Schedule.

APPENDIX C

GUIDELINES FOR DANCES WITH DOGS SCHEDULES

Subject to member body requirements, published Schedules for Dances with Dogs competitions normally include the following information: 1. The name of the Affiliate conducting the competition. 2. The date and venue at which the competition is to be conducted. 3. Details of the venue (such as whether it is an open or roofed/enclosed area, the surface of the ring [eg grass, carpet etc] and the specific dimensions of the ring). 4. The closing date for entries. 5. The address to which entries should be forwarded. 6. Entry fees. 7. Divisions and classes offered and the members of the Judging Panel(s) for each. 8. Commencing time of vetting, submission of music, music checks and judging. 9. Contact phone number (mobile) for the Affiliate on the day of the competition. 10. Such other information specific to the competition as the Affiliate considers appropriate.

ITEM 40 – TRICK DOG TITLES

DOGS WEST PROPOSAL Add titles for Trick Dogs 4 levels of titles for Trick Dog:

• Starter Trick Dog (TKS) • Novice Trick Dog (TKN) • Intermediate Trick Dog (TKI) • Advanced Trick Dog (TKA)

CLASS STARTER NOVICE INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED

NO OF CERTIFICATES 3 5 5 8

QUALIFY UNDER A MINIMUM NO OF JUDGES 2 2 2 3

A full description of the levels, and score sheet is attached.

DOGS WEST RATIONALE We wish to encourage and promote training of dogs and the teaching of new behaviours in a positive manner, training tricks helps dog owners perform successfully in the Freestyle section of Dances with Dogs and creates a great bond.

However we have found that many that enjoy the training of tricks do not feel that they can compete as they do not wish to be judge on their musical ability and choreography.

By introducing these new titles we feel we will encourage more people to participate and as they move to the advanced section which includes bonus points for story telling that they may feel comfortable to move to the freestyle side of Dances with Dogs.

Even if they do not the benefits to the Dog, Handler, the Community and Spectators that watch our sport can only be enhanced by adding these titles.

ITEM 41 – FCI AFFILIATION AND CHAMPIONSHIP COMPETITIONS AND TITLES DOGS QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL AND RATIONALE

FCI – International Dog Dancing Competitions - Submission for Australian National Kennel Council to affiliate with FCI for International Dog Dancing Champion Competitions and Titles

The Australian National Kennel Council in an agreement with the FCI is now a recognised social member of the FCI. Therefore, ANKC Affiliates will have the opportunity to apply for sanctioned events to conduct FCI Dog Dancing Competitions once procedures are put in place. Such sanctioned events will give competing dogs in Australia the opportunity to compete for the FCI Title of International Dog Dancing Champion Freestyle/Heelwork to Music.

While this membership arrangement between the ANKC and FCI is still in the early stages Dogs Queensland wishes to propose the following items for consideration. These items would provide a basis for discussion once the membership process with the FCI is further progressed and would ensure that ANKC Dances With Dogs is well positioned to offer ANKC members the facility to compete for the FCI International Championship titles.

1. Competitions:

Upon application and permission from the ANKC, Affiliated ANKC Clubs may conduct Competitions under the Rules and Regulations presently in use by the FCI for International Dog Dancing Competitions. The FCI International Dog Dancing Competition rules would be used in place of the ANKC Dances With Dogs Rules - (See Appendix 1 – FCI Dog Dancing Competition Rules). For example, the FCI competition may be conducted as solo event, at the conclusion of an ANKC competition or there may be two separate judging panels being utilised during an ANKC competition; one panel would be judging under ANKC Rules and the other would be judging under FCI Rules.

2. Judges Training:

ANKC DWD Licensed Judges will need to apply to the ANKC to become sanctioned FCI International Dog Dancing Licensed Judges. Aspiring Judges will undergo a training programme to ensure that Australian Judges judging FCI events were competent and understanding of FCI Rules for Dog Dancing Competitions. Minimum training requirements will be developed by the ANKC National Dances With Dogs Committee. Trainee judges will undergo evaluation and will have to attain a certain standard before being licensed to judge FCI events. These training programmes will be conducted by the relevant ANKC State Member Body and that State’s present Dances With Dogs Judges Training Panel.