U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service Draft Bison and Elk Management Plan/EIS Errata
Summary, page xxi, Column 2, Economic Impacts, 1st paragraph, lines 1-4 – The sentence should read: “Under the alternatives, the economic impacts of recreational activities (sleigh rides, wildlife viewing, and hunting) could decrease the local economy by 1%-7%, 7% being the estimated worst case scenario.”
Page 71, Column 1, 2nd to the last paragraph, line 1 – The words, “phased out”, should read “phased back”.
Page 126, Column 2, last paragraph, last 4 lines and top 2 lines of pg. 127, Column 1 – The park names are in reverse order. The sentence should read: “For example, the prevalence of brucellosis in infected free-ranging bison herds in Wood Buffalo National Park in Canada and Yellowstone National Park ranges from 25% (Tessaro, Forbes, and Turcotte 1990) to 70.3% (Roffe, Rhyan, et al. 1999).”
Page 250, Column 1, last paragraph, 5 lines above the column end – Change “measuring” to “estimated”.
Page 267, Column 2 – Add line between 1st and 2nd paragraphs.
Page 267, Column 2, Long-term Effects paragraph, lines 8-10 – Delete “especially if the fence on the southern and southwestern sides of the refuge prevented access to some native winter range”.
Pg. 303, Column 1, 1st full paragraph, line 3 – Delete “as well as standing forage”.