This Submission Proposesresolutions for Miscellaneous Comments with the Following 4 Cids

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0535r0

IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs

LB 200 MAC CID 2670-2454-2482-2484 Resolution

Date: 2014-4-8

Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone Email 1 Fusionopolis Zander Lei I2R Way #21-01 +65 6408 2436 [email protected] Connexis

Abstract This submission proposes resolutions for miscellaneous comments with the following 4 CIDs: - 2670, 2454, 2482, 2484

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0535r0

Interpretation of a Motion to Adopt

A motion to approve this submission means that the editing instructions and any changed or added material are actioned in the TGah Draft. This introduction is not part of the adopted material.

Editing instructions formatted like this are intended to be copied into the TGah Draft (i.e. they are instructions to the 802.11 editor on how to merge the text with the baseline documents).

TGah Editor: Editing instructions preceded by “TGah Editor” are instructions to the TGah editor to modify existing material in the TGah draft. As a result of adopting the changes, the TGah editor will execute the instructions rather than copy them to the TGah Draft.

CID Page. Clause Comment Propose Change Resolution Line 2670 39.11 8.3.1.1 Title of Figure 8-14a is Change the title to: Agree with the commenter. confusing as "Type is equal to 1" "Frame Control field subfield Revised: refers to control frames which is values within S1G control frames already mentioned. when Subtype is not equal to TGah editor to make changes and not equal to 10" shown under heading CID2670 in 11-14-xxxxr0

2454 When things like "(Modified)" Either get rid of all thse Agree with the commenter. and "(NDP)" are used parentheticals, or add something to parenthetically like this, it is not 8.2.2 giving some examples after Revised. clear whether the meaning is the QoS frame-based examples clarification or alternation. That TGah editor to make changes is, if I see "(NDP) ACK" does shown under heading this mean "ACK or NDP ACK" CID2454 in 11-14-xxxxr0 or does it mean "an ACK, which is necessarily an NDP ACK in this context". Similarly "NDP (Modified) ACK" -- is an NDP ACK possible? 2482 In some places "(Short)" has Assure me it's been done Agree with the commenter in been added before various everywhere, so if I see something general. The draft has been management frame names. I'm without a "(Short)" in the amended accordingly for not sure it has been done in all combination of baseline+this better clarification when places where it has, i.e. where a amendment it really does not apply addressing other comments. Short frame would be as good as to Short frames The parenthesis in “(Short)” a normal one has already been removed in Draft 1.2.

Revised.

No further action is needed for TGah editor. 2484 Why is there no Make sure there's one of each, and Rejected. dot11ShortBeaconOptionActivat the text refers to the right thing ed? More generally, shouldn't (generally Activated, I would Short Beacon is mandatory there be an Activated for every expect) (“always activated”) once Implemented, and vice-versa? dot11ShortBeaconOptionImp lemented is true. It is not nessesory to define a new MIB entry “dot11ShortBeaconOptionAc tivated”.

No action is needed for TGah editor.

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0535r0

[CID 2670] Instruction to TGah editor: Please modify the caption of Figure 8-14a in subclause 8.3.1.1 (Format of control frames) as Figure 8-14a—Frame Control field subfield values within S1G control frames when Type is equal to 1 and Subtype is not equal to and not equal to 10

[CID 2454] Instruction to TGah editor: Please apply the changes below throughout the draft - Replace “(NDP) ACK” with “ACK or NDP ACKAck” throughout the draft - Replace “NDP (Modified) ACK” with “NDP ACK Ack or NDP PS-Poll-AckModified ACK” throughout the draft