Canadian national Election Study-1965

List of Variables v1 ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225 v2 INTERVIEW NUMBER v3 INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE v4 DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE v5 PROVINCE OF INTERVIEW v6 R CONSTITUENCY v7 SIZE OF PLACE m8.1 MOST IMP PROBLEMS FOR CANADA-1 m8.2 MOST IMP PROBLEMS FOR CANADA-2 m9.1 PRBLM FOR CDA-SPECIAL CONCERN TO R-1 m9.2 PRBLM FOR CDA-SPECIAL CONCERN TO R-2 v10 R FEELINGS ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS v11 R REASON FOR FEELINGS ELECTION RESULTS v12 FED/PROV GOVT HANDLES CANADIAN PROBLEMS v13 ANY PROVINCIAL GOVT MORE POWERFUL v14 NL GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v15 PEI GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v16 NS GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v17 NB GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v18 QC GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v19 ON GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v20 MB GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v21 SK GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v22 AB GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v23 BC GOVT MORE POWERFUL COMPARED W/OTHERS v24 LEVEL OF GOVT MOST IMP TO R m25.1 IMP ISSUES IN ELECTION-1 m25.2 IMP ISSUES IN ELECTION-2 v26 SOCIAL WELFARE ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION v27 ECONOMIC ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION v28 ENG/FR ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION v29 FLAG ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION v30 CANADIAN UNITY-IMP FOR ELECTION v31 GOVT CORRUPTION-IMP FOR ELECTION v32 MAJORITY GOVT ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION v33 STRONG LEADER ISSUE-IMP FOR ELECTION v34 MAKE DIFF IF PARTY FORMING GOVT MAJORITY v35 VOTE FOR OTHER PARTY IF MAJORITY GOVT v36 DEGREE OF INTEREST IN POLITICS v37 CROOKED PEOPLE IN GOVT v38 TAX MONEY WASTED BY GOVT v39 TRUST GOVT TO DO RIGHT THING v40 PPL WHO ARE HIGH IN GOVT TREAT PPL EQUAL v41 GOVT PEOPLE KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING v42 VOTING ALLOWS SAY IN HOW GOVT RUN THINGS v43 GOVT DOESN'T CARE WHAT PPL LIKE ME THINK v44 POLITICS TOO COMPLICATED FOR PPL LIKE ME v45 PPL LIKE ME HAVE NO SAY WHAT GOVT DOES v46 MP'S LOSE TOUCH WITH PEOPLE v47 INTELLECTUALS TOO STRONG IN GOVT v48 PERSONAL FINANCIAL SATISFACTION v49 CHANGE IN PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION v50 PERSONAL EMPLOYMENT SITUATION v51 FUTURE PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION v52 ELCTN RESULT AFFECT PRSNL FIN SITUATION v53 ELCTN RSLT-PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION v54 R BEEN UNEMPLOYED DURING PAST YEAR v55 FAMILY MEMBER BEEN UNEMPLOYED PAST YEAR v56 R/FAMILY MBR BEEN UNEMPLOYED LAST 3 YEAR v57 ANY PROVINCE/REGION BTR OFF THAN OTHERS v58 NL BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v59 PEI BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v60 NS BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v61 NB BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v62 QC BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v63 ON BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v64 MB BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v65 SK BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v66 AB BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v67 BC BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v68 MARITIMES BETTER OFF THAN OTHER REGIONS v69 PRAIRIES BETTER OFF THAN OTHER REGIONS v70 SPECIFC AREA BETTER OFF THAN OTHERS v71 ANY PROVINCE/REGION WORSE OFF v72 NL WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v73 PEI WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v74 NS WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v75 NB WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v76 QC WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v77 ON WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v78 MB WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v79 SK WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v80 AB WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v81 BC WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES v82 MARITIMES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER REGIONS v83 PRAIRIES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER REGIONS v84 SPECIFIC AREA WORSE OFF THAN OTHERS v85 R'S OWN PROVINCE ... THAN OTHER v86 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-NEWFOUNDLAND v87 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND v88 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-NOVA SCOTIA v89 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-NEW BRUNSWICK v90 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-QUEBEC v91 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-ONTARIO v92 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-MANITOBA v93 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-SASKATCHEWAN v94 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-ALBERTA v95 R WOULD LIKE LIVE-BRITISH COLUMBIA v96 R WOULD NOT LIVE-NEWFOUNDLAND v97 R WOULD NOT LIVE-PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND v98 R WOULD NOT LIVE-NOVA SCOTIA v99 R WOULD NOT LIVE-NEW BRUNSWICK v100 R WOULD NOT LIVE-QUEBEC v101 R WOULD NOT LIVE-ONTARIO v102 R WOULD NOT LIVE-MANITOBA v103 R WOULD NOT LIVE-SASKATCHEWAN v104 R WOULD NOT LIVE-ALBERTA v105 R WOULD NOT LIVE-BRITISH COLUMBIA v106 DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES v107 DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC v108 DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO v109 DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES v110 DIEFENBAKER-CONNECTION TO BC v111 PEARSON-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES v112 PEARSON-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC v113 PEARSON-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO v114 PEARSON-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES v115 PEARSON-CONNECTION TO BC v116 DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES v117 DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC v118 DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO v119 DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES v120 DOUGLAS-CONNECTION TO BC v121 THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES v122 THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC v123 THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO v124 THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES v125 THOMPSON-CONNECTION TO BC v126 CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO MARITIMES v127 CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO QUEBEC v128 CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO ONTARIO v129 CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO PRAIRIES v130 CAOUETTE-CONNECTION TO BC m131.1 WHICH POLITICIAN MAKE BEST PM-MENTION 1 m131.2 WHICH POLITICIAN MAKE BEST PM-MENTION 2 v132 HOW MUCH DIFFERENCE BTWN FEDERAL PARTIES v133 FEDERAL PARTIES MOST ALIKE v134 FEDERAL PARTIES LEAST ALIKE v135 PARTY THAT GOVERNS MATTERS v136 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-1 v137 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-2 v138 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-3 v139 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-4 v140 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-5 v141 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-6 v142 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-7 v143 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-8 v144 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-9 v145 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-10 v146 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-11 v147 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-12 v148 YOUR IDEAL PARTY RATING-13 v149 LIB PARTY RATING-1 v150 LIB PARTY RATING-2 v151 LIB PARTY RATING-3 v152 LIB PARTY RATING-4 v153 LIB PARTY RATING-5 v154 LIB PARTY RATING-6 v155 LIB PARTY RATING-7 v156 LIB PARTY RATING-8 v157 LIB PARTY RATING-9 v158 LIB PARTY RATING-10 v159 LIB PARTY RATING-11 v160 LIB PARTY RATING-12 v161 LIB PARTY RATING-13 v162 PC PARTY RATING-1 v163 PC PARTY RATING-2 v164 PC PARTY RATING-3 v165 PC PARTY RATING-4 v166 PC PARTY RATING-5 v167 PC PARTY RATING-6 v168 PC PARTY RATING-7 v169 PC PARTY RATING-8 v170 PC PARTY RATING-9 v171 PC PARTY RATING-10 v172 PC PARTY RATING-11 v173 PC PARTY RATING-12 v174 PC PARTY RATING-13 v175 NDP PARTY RATING-1 v176 NDP PARTY RATING-2 v177 NDP PARTY RATING-3 v178 NDP PARTY RATING-4 v179 NDP PARTY RATING-5 v180 NDP PARTY RATING-6 v181 NDP PARTY RATING-7 v182 NDP PARTY RATING-8 v183 NDP PARTY RATING-9 v184 NDP PARTY RATING-10 v185 NDP PARTY RATING-11 v186 NDP PARTY RATING-12 v187 NDP PARTY RATING-13 v188 SC PARTY RATING-1 v189 SC PARTY RATING-2 v190 SC PARTY RATING-3 v191 SC PARTY RATING-4 v192 SC PARTY RATING-5 v193 SC PARTY RATING-6 v194 SC PARTY RATING-7 v195 SC PARTY RATING-8 v196 SC PARTY RATING-9 v197 SC PARTY RATING-10 v198 SC PARTY RATING-11 v199 SC PARTY RATING-12 v200 SC PARTY RATING-13 v201 CRED PARTY RATING-1 v202 CRED PARTY RATING-2 v203 CRED PARTY RATING-3 v204 CRED PARTY RATING-4 v205 CRED PARTY RATING-5 v206 CRED PARTY RATING-6 v207 CRED PARTY RATING-7 v208 CRED PARTY RATING-8 v209 CRED PARTY RATING-9 v210 CRED PARTY RATING-10 v211 CRED PARTY RATING-11 v212 CRED PARTY RATING-12 v213 CRED PARTY RATING-13 v214 LIBERAL MPS-JOB PERFORMNCE v215 CONSERVATIVE MPS-JOB PERFORMANCE v216 NDP MPS-JOB PERFORMANCE v217 SOCIAL CREDIT MPS-JOB PERFORMANCE v218 CREDITISTE MPS-JOB PERFORMANCE v219 QC ONLY-SC PARTY BTR/WRSE THAN OTHERS v220 QC ONLY-SC COME TO POWER IN NEXT 10 YRS v221 R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION v222 R'S STRENGTH OF PARTY IDENTIFICATION v223 R EVER FEEL CLOSER TO ANY PARTY IN PAST v224 PARTY ID-FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL v225 FEDERAL ID KNOWN:PROVINCIAL PARTY ID v226 PROVINCIAL ID KNOWN:FEDERAL PARTY ID v227 NON-ID:LEAN TOWARDS WHICH PARTY v228 NON-ID:LEAN TO PARTY-FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL v229 NON-ID:FED ID KNOWN:LEAN PROV PARTY v230 NON-ID:PROV ID KNOWN:LEAN FED PARTY v231 NON-ID:LEAN TOWARDS PARTY-PAST v232 TRUE NON-ID-EVER LEAN TOWARDS A PARTY v233 WHEN DID R'S PARTY ID CHANGE v234 MAIN THING WHY R CHANGED PARTY ID v235 SECOND CHOICE FOR FEDERAL PARTY v236 LAST CHOICE FOR FEDERAL PARTY v237 MOST IMP WHEN VOTING:LEADER,PARTY,CAND v238 R'S VOTE WHEN BAD CAND,GOOD PARTY v239 R'S VOTE WHEN BAD POLICY,GOOD PARTY v240 FATHER'S INTEREST IN POLITICS v241 FATHER'S POLITICAL PARTY PREFERENCE v242 MOTHER'S INTEREST IN POLITICS v243 MOTHER'S PARTY PREFERENCE v244 REMEMBER NAME OF ELECTD CAND LAST ELECTN v245 REMEMBR PARTY OF ELECTD CAND LAST ELECTN v246 R READ/HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT ELECTED MP v247 TYPE OF INFO R READ/HEARD ABOUT MP v248 WAS THE ELECTED MP THE INCUMBENT v249 IF INCUMBENT, DID MP AID CONSTITUENCY v250 ELECTED MP EVER AID R/R'S FAMILY m251.1 RMBR NAME OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION1 m251.2 RMBR NAME OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION2 m251.3 RMBR NAME OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION3 m251.4 RMBR NAME OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION4 m252.1 RMBR PRTY OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION1 m252.2 RMBR PRTY OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION2 m252.3 RMBR PRTY OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION3 m252.4 RMBR PRTY OF OTHR CAND IN RIDNG-MENTION4 m253.1 READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT CAND-MENTION1 m253.2 READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT CAND-MENTION2 m253.3 READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT CAND-MENTION3 m253.4 READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT CAND-MENTION4 v254 REGULAR VOTER IN FEDERAL ELCTN v255 VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY IN FED ELECTION v256 VOTE WHICH SAME PARTY IN FED ELECTION v257 REGULAR VOTER IN PROV ELECTION v258 VOTE FOR SAME PARTY IN PROV ELECTION v259 VOTE WHICH SAME PARTY IN PROV ELECTION v260 QUEBEC VOTE 1962 FED ELECTION v261 QUEBEC VOTE 1963 FED ELECTION v262 QUEBEC VOTE 1965 FED ELECTION v263 WHEN DID R DECIDE HOW TO VOTE v264 WAS THE 1965 VOTE EASY OR NOT v265 WHY 1965 VOTE DECISION NOT EASY v266 DID R USE AN AID TO REMEMBER CAND NAME v267 WHY CHANGE VOTE FROM 1963 TO 1965 v268 R'S REASON FOR 1965 VOTE v269 PARTY VOTED FOR LAST PROV ELECTION v270 MOST IMP ELCTNS:LOCAL/PROVINCIAL/FEDERAL v271 DID R ATTEND CAMPAIGN MEETINGS v272 # OF CAMPAIGN MEETINGS ATTENDED v273 DID R READ PRTY MATERIALS DURNG CAMPAIGN v274 R HAVE ANY PARTY CANVASS AT THEIR HOME v275 CONSERVATIVES CANVASSED AT R'S HOME v276 LIBERALS CANVASSED AT R'S HOME v277 NDP CANVASSED AT R'S HOME v278 SOCIAL CREDIT CANVASSED AT R'S HOME v279 OTHER PARTY CANVASSED AT R'S HOME v280 R PERSONALLY HELP A PARTY/CANDIDATE v281 R TRIED TO INFLUENCE OTHER PPLS VOTE v282 R A MEMBER OF A POLITICAL ORGANIZATION v283 HEARD ABOUT FED PARTY RAISING FUNDS v284 R CANVASSD FOR PARTY/CAND CONTRBUTION v285 WAS HH ASKED TO DONATE $ FOR PARTY/CAND v286 WHO IN HH WAS ASKED TO DONATE $ FOR PRTY v287 CONSERVATIVE ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION v288 LIBERAL ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION v289 NDP ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION v290 SOCIAL CREDIT ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION v291 OTHER PARTY ASKED R FOR CONTRIBUTION v292 HOW WAS R APPROACHED FOR CONTRIBUTION v293 R KNEW MONEY CANVASSER v294 R MADE CONTRIBUTIONS TO WHICH PARTY v295 OTHER IN HH CONTRIBUTE TO CAMPAIGN FUNDS v296 WOULD R HAVE CONTRIBUTD TO PRTY IF ASKED v297 R WOULD RATHER GIVE MONEY/TIME TO PARTY v298 FEELNGS ABOUT BUSNESS/UNIONS CONTRBUTION v299 SHOULD PLTCL CNTRBTNS BE TAX DEDUCTIBLE v300 SHOULD PARTY PUBLISH EXPENSES v301 SHOULD PARTY CONTRIBUTORS BE KNOWN v302 SHOULD PRTY REVEAL AMOUNT OF CONTRBTIONS v303 SHOULD GOVT PAY ANY CAMPAIGN EXPENSES v304 R'S MARITAL STATUS v305 WHO IS THE FAMILY'S MAIN WAGE EARNER v306 FAMILY'S MAIN WAGE EARNER'S OCCUPATION v307 R'S YEARS OF SCHOOLING v308 R'S SOCIAL CLASS-OWN RANKING v309 R'S RELIGION v310 R'S CHURCH ATTENDANCE v311 R'S ETHNIC ORIGIN v312 R'S PLACE OF BIRTH v313 YEAR R IMMIGRATED TO CANADA v314 R'S SPOKEN LANGUAGE AT HOME v315 SIZE OF GEOGRAPHIC PLACE WHERE R GREW UP v316 HAS R LIVED IN OTHER CANADIAN PROVINCES v317 R LIVED IN NEWFOUNDLAND v318 R LIVED IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND v319 R LIVED IN NOVA SCOTIA v320 R LIVED IN NEW BRUNSWICK v321 R LIVED IN QUEBEC v322 R LIVED IN ONTARIO v323 R LIVED IN MANITOBA v324 R LIVED IN SASKACTHEWAN v325 R LIVED IN ALBERTA v326 R LIVED IN BRITISH COLUMBIA v327 R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO LABOR UNION v328 R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO TRADE ASSOCIATION v329 R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO FARM ORGANIZATION v330 R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO PROF ASSOC v331 R/HH MEMBER BELONG TO OTHR VOL ASSOC v332 QC ONLY-R VISIT OTHR'S HOME-LAST 7 DAYS v333 QC ONLY-OTHRS VISIT R'S HOME-LAST 7 DAYS v334 QC ONLY-R HAS BEEN OUT W/OTHRS-LST 7 DAY v335 R'S AGE (YEARS) v336 R'S FAMILY INCOME v337 R'S SEX