DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 CDP Cities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2016 CDP Cities City Country Region Access Commune de Bakata* Burkina Faso Africa Public La mairie de Bujumbura* Burundi Africa Public City of Yaoundé 6* Cameroon Africa Public Commune de Bangangté* Cameroon Africa Public Ville de Foumban* Cameroon Africa Public City of Abidjan Cote d Ivoire Africa Public City of Grand-Bassam* Cote d Ivoire Africa Public Democratic Republic of Ville de Kananga* Congo Africa Public Democratic Republic of Ville de KinsHasa* Congo Africa Public City of Cairo* Egypt Africa Not Public Addis Ababa City Administration EtHiopia Africa Public Accra Metropolitan Assembly* Ghana Africa Not public City of Kisumu* Kenya Africa Public City of Nairobi Kenya Africa Public City of Nakuru* Kenya Africa Public Antananarivo* Madagascar Africa Public Blantyre City Council* Malawi Africa Public Lilongwe City Council* Malawi Africa Public Municipalité de Rabat* Morocco Africa Public Cidade de Maputo* Mozambique Africa Public Municipality of Nacala* Mozambique Africa Public City of WindHoek* Namibia Africa Public Abuja Federal Capital Territory* Nigeria Africa Public City of Ibadan* Nigeria Africa Public City of Lagos Nigeria Africa Public City of ZiguincHor* Senegal Africa Public Commune de Dioudoubou* Senegal Africa Public City of Cape Town SoutH Africa Africa Public City of Durban SoutH Africa Africa Public City of JoHannesburg SoutH Africa Africa Public City of Pietermaritzburg SoutH Africa Africa Public EkurHuleni Metropolitan Municipality SoutH Africa Africa Public Emfuleni Local Municipality* SoutH Africa Africa Public Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality* SoutH Africa Africa Public Pretoria - Tshwane SoutH Africa Africa Public SekHukHune District Municipality* SoutH Africa Africa Public Ugu District Municipality* SoutH Africa Africa Public 1 Vhembe District Municipality* SoutH Africa Africa Public Commune Ain DraHem* Tunisia Africa Public Jinja Municipal Council* Uganda Africa Public United Republic of ArusHa City Council* Tanzania Africa Public United Republic of City of Dar es Salaam Tanzania Africa Public United Republic of Morogoro Municipal Council* Tanzania Africa Public United Republic of Mwanza City Council* Tanzania Africa Public Mazabuka Municipal Council* Zambia Africa Public City of Harare* Zimbabwe Africa Not public City of SHenzHen China East Asia Not Public People's Government of GuangzHou Municipality* China East Asia Public WuHan Municipal People's Government China East Asia Not public Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Hong Kong East Asia Public City of HirosHima Japan East Asia Public City of Nagoya Japan East Asia Public City of Okayama* Japan East Asia Public City of YokoHama Japan East Asia Public Tokyo Metropolitan Government Japan East Asia Public Ansan City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Boseong County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Changwon City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Cheongsong County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Daejeon Metropolitan City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Damyang County* SoutH Korea East Asia Public Geoje City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Geumsan County SoutH Korea East Asia Public GoHeung County* SoutH Korea East Asia Public Gokseong County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Gunpo City* SoutH Korea East Asia Public Gurye County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Gwangju Metropolitan City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Gwangyang City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Haenam County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Hoengseong County SoutH Korea East Asia Public HongcHeon County SoutH Korea East Asia Public HwacHeon County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Imsil County SoutH Korea East Asia Public IncHeon Metropolitan City SoutH Korea East Asia Public 2 Inje County SoutH Korea East Asia Public JangHeung County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Jangseong County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Jecheon City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Jeju City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Jeongseon County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Jeonju City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Mokpo City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Muan County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Naju City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Nonsan City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Pyeongtaek City SoutH Korea East Asia Public SamcHeok City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Sejong Metropolitan Autonomous City* SoutH Korea East Asia Public SeocHeon County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Seogwipo City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Seoul Metropolitan Government SoutH Korea East Asia Public Shinan County SoutH Korea East Asia Public SuncHang County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Suwon City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Tongyeong City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Uljin County SoutH Korea East Asia Public Wonju City SoutH Korea East Asia Public Yeonggwang County SoutH Korea East Asia Public HsincHu County Government Taiwan East Asia Public KaoHsiung City Government Taiwan East Asia Public New Taipei City Government Taiwan East Asia Public Pingtung County Government Taiwan East Asia Public Tainan City Government* Taiwan East Asia Not Public Taipei City Government Taiwan East Asia Public Taoyuan City Hall* Taiwan East Asia Public Yilan County* Taiwan East Asia Public City of Tirana* Albania Europe Not public Sofia Municipality* Bulgaria Europe Not public Stara Zagora* Bulgaria Europe Public City of Zagreb* Croatia Europe Public Brno City Council* CzecH Republic Europe Public AarHus Kommune* Denmark Europe Public Alleroed Minicipality* Denmark Europe Public City of Ærøskøbing* Denmark Europe Public 3 City of CopenHagen Denmark Europe Public City of Hvidovre* Denmark Europe Public Egedal Municipality* Denmark Europe Public Frederikshavn Kommune* Denmark Europe Public Gladsaxe Kommune* Denmark Europe Public Hoeje-Taastrup Kommune* Denmark Europe Public HørsHolm Kommune* Denmark Europe Public Jammerbugt Kommune* Denmark Europe Public Middelfart Kommune* Denmark Europe Not public Municipality of Hjørring* Denmark Europe Public Odder Kommune* Denmark Europe Public Skive Kommune* Denmark Europe Public Sonderborg Kommune* Denmark Europe Public City of JoHvi* Estonia Europe Public City of Helsinki Finland Europe Public City of LaHti Finland Europe Public City of Turku Finland Europe Public Amiens Métropole France Europe Public City of Paris France Europe Public Communauté urbaine du Grand Nancy* France Europe Public Métropole Nice Côte d'Azur France Europe Public Ville de Villeurbanne* France Europe Public Tbilisi City Georgia Europe Public City of Berlin Germany Europe Not public Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg Germany Europe Public Landeshauptstadt Magdeburg* Germany Europe Public Stadt Heidelberg Germany Europe Public City of Gibraltar Gibraltar Europe Not public City of AtHens Greece Europe Public Municipality of THessaloniki* Greece Europe Not public City of Akureyri* Iceland Europe Public City of Reykjavík Iceland Europe Public Dublin City Council Ireland Europe Public Comune di Bologna Italy Europe Public Comune di Bolzano Italy Europe Public Comune di Cagliari* Italy Europe Not public Comune di Ferrara Italy Europe Public Comune di Firenze* Italy Europe Public Comune di Genova Italy Europe Public Comune di Lucca* Italy Europe Public 4 Comune di Milano Italy Europe Public Comune di Monza* Italy Europe Not public Comune di Napoli Italy Europe Public Comune di Olbia* Italy Europe Public Comune di Oristano Italy Europe Public Comune di Padova Italy Europe Public Comune di Piacenza Italy Europe Public Comune di Ravenna Italy Europe Public Comune di Reggio Emilia Italy Europe Public Comune di Rimini* Italy Europe Public Comune di Torino Italy Europe Public Comune di Udine Italy Europe Public Comune di Venezia Italy Europe Public Roma Capitale Italy Europe Public Pristina Municipality* Kosovo Europe Public Šiauliai City Municipality* Lithuania Europe Not Public Vilnius City Municipality Lithuania Europe Public Ville de Monaco Monaco Europe Public City of Podgorica* Montenegro Europe Public City of Amsterdam NetHerlands Europe Public Gemeente Groningen* NetHerlands Europe Public Gemeente Nijmegen NetHerlands Europe Public Gemeente Rotterdam NetHerlands Europe Public The Hague* NetHerlands Europe Public Bærum Kommune* Norway Europe Public City of Oslo Norway Europe Public Tromsø Municipality* Norway Europe Not public Trondheim Municipality Norway Europe Not public City of Gdynia* Poland Europe Public City of Warsaw Poland Europe Public City of Wroclaw* Poland Europe Public Gdańsk* Poland Europe Public Tarnów* Poland Europe Public Barreiro Portugal Europe Public Cascais Portugal Europe Public City of Lisbon Portugal Europe Public City of Porto Portugal Europe Public Fafe Portugal Europe Not public Faro Portugal Europe Public Funchal Portugal Europe Public 5 Município de Águeda Portugal Europe Public Município de Braga Portugal Europe Public Município de Lamego Portugal Europe Not public Município de MatosinHos Portugal Europe Not public Município de Moita Portugal Europe Public Município de Ovar* Portugal Europe Public Município de Vila Nova de Famalicão Portugal Europe Public Santarém Portugal Europe Public Torres Vedras Municipality Portugal Europe Public Viseu* Portugal Europe Not Public City of Alba-Iulia* Romania Europe Public City of Tulcea* Romania Europe Not public Moscow Government Russia Europe Public Subotica Serbia Europe Public City of Ljubljana* Slovenia Europe Public Ajuntament de Barcelona Spain Europe Not public Ayuntamiento de Madrid Spain Europe Public Ayuntamiento de Murcia* Spain Europe Public City of Zaragoza Spain Europe Public City of StockHolm Sweden Europe Public Municipality of Trelleborg* Sweden Europe Public Basel-Stadt Switzerland Europe Public Stadt
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Regional Director

    Report of the Regional Director

    The W ork of WHO in the South-East Asia Region 2018 The Work of WHO in the South-East Asia Region Report of the Regional Director Report of the Regional Director This report describes the work of the World Health Organization in the South-East 1 January–31 December Asia Region during the period 1 January–31 December 2018. It highlights the achievements in public health and WHO's contribution to achieving the 1 January–31 December 2018 Organization's strategic objectives through collaborative activities. This report will be useful for all those interested in health development in the Region. ISBN 978 92 9022 717 5 www.searo.who.int https://twitter.com/WHOSEARO https://www.facebook.com/WHOSEARO 9 789290 227175 SEA/RC72/2 The work of WHO in the South-East Asia Region Report of the Regional Director 1 January–31 December 2018 The Work of WHO in the South-East Asia Region, Report of the Regional Director, 1 January–31 December 2018 ISBN: 978 92 9022 717 5 © World Health Organization 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted.

  • 2013 GOC Chart As of August 1St 2012.Xlsx

    2013 Games Organizing Committee Chart (As of August 1st, 2012) Chairwoman of 2013 GOC Chief Secretary 5th Na, Kyung Won Choi, Su Young Cho, Sung Jin The National Assembly Contract Employee Contract Employee 4th Officer of Audit & Inspection Secretary Secretary General of 2013 GOC Officer of Games Security 4th 4th 4th Jeon, Choon Mi Kwon, Oh Yeong Park, Hyun Joo Lim, Byoung Soo Kim, Ki Yong Jang, Chun Sik Park, Yoon Soo Lee, Chan Sub Donghae city The Board of Audit & Inspection of Korea Gangwon Province ormer Assistant Deputy Minister of MCS Gangwon Province Gangwon Province GW Police Agency Director General of Planning Bureau Director General of Competition Management Bureau Director General of Games Support Bureau Yi, Ki Jeong Cho, Kyu Seok Ahn, Nae Hyong Ministry of Culture, S & T Gangwon Province Ministry of Strategy & Finance Director of Planning & GA Departmen Director of Int'l Affairs Department Director of Competition Department Director of Facilities Department Director of HR & Supplies Departmen rector of Games Support Departme Jeon, Jae Sup Kim, Gyu Young Lee, Kang Il Lim, Seung Kyu Lee, Gyeong Ho Hong, Jong Yeoul Gangwon Province MOFAT Ministry of PA & Security Gangwon Province Gangwon Province Gangwon Province Manager of Planning Team anager of General Affairs Te Manager of Finance Team Manager of Protocol Team anager of Int'l Relations TeaManager of Immigration Tea anager of Credentialing Tea Manager of General Competitions Team Manager of Competition Support Tea Manager Snow Sports Team Manager of Ice Sports Team Manager
  • City and Delegate Profiles

    City and Delegate Profiles

    City and Delegate Profiles 1 Bangladesh Benapole Benapole Pourashava (town) is located in Sharsha (Jessore district) about 7 km from Upazila headquarter and about 34 km from the district headquarter, Jessore. The Pourashava came into existence on 16th May 2006 as a `C’ Class Pourashava and became an `A’ Class Pourashava on 20 September 2011. The 2011 total population of the Pourashava is 88,672. Benapole Pourashava is governed by 1 Mayor and 12 Councilors – 9 male and 3 female. The Pourashava is spread over an area of 17.40 km2 and is divided into 9 wards consisting of 9 mouzas. Benapole Pourashava has regional significance because the Asian Highway and Railway line both pass through the Pourashava. The Pourashava faces many problems like the lack of planned residential areas, lack of electricity and safe drinking water, traffic congestion, lack of community facilities, lack of infrastructure facilities, and poor capacity of the Pourashava administration etc. Population size 88,672 Land area (km2) 17.4 Population density (per km2) 5,096 Md. Asraful Alam Liton Mayor, Benapole Municipality He is a businessman by profession and became the Mayor of Benapole in February 2011. South-South City Leaders’ Forum 2014 2 Bangladesh Chuadanga Chuadanga District was a sub-division of former Kushtia District and was upgraded to a District on 26th February, 1984. It was raised to the status of a Municipality in 1972 and became a “B” class Municipality in 1984. At that time, Chuadanga Municipality had an area of 32.67 km2 with three wards and 13 mahallas. It was upgraded to an “A” class Municipality in 1995 with an area of 37.39 km2, consisting of 9 wards, 41 mahallas, 13 mouzas and 71 mouza sheet (BBS-2001).
  • Pakistan) Kumari Navaratne (Sri Lanka) G

    Pakistan) Kumari Navaratne (Sri Lanka) G

    Public Disclosure Authorized BETTER REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH FOR POOR WOMEN IN SOUTH ASIA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Report of the South Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized Analytical and Advisory Activity MAY 2007 Authors Meera Chatterjee Ruth Levine Shreelata Rao-Seshadri Nirmala Murthy Team Meera Chattejee (Team Leader) Ruth Levine (Adviser) Bina Valaydon (Bangladesh) Farial Mahmud (Bangladesh) Tirtha Rana (Nepal) Shahnaz Kazi (Pakistan) Kumari Navaratne (Sri Lanka) G. Srihari (Program Assistant) Research Analysts Pranita Achyut P.N. Rajna Ruhi Saith Anabela Abreu: Sector Manager, SASHD Julian Schweitzer: Sector Director, SASHD Praful Patel: Vice President, South Asia Region Consultants Bangladesh International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh Data International, Bangladesh India Indicus Analytics, New Delhi Foundation for Research in Health Systems, Bangalore Nepal New Era, Kathmandu Maureen Dar Iang, Kathmandu Pakistan Population Council, Pakistan Sri Lanka Medistat, Colombo Institute for Participation in Development, Colombo Institute of Policy Studies, Sri Lanka This study and report were financed by a grant from the Bank-Netherlands Partnership Program (BNPP) BETTER REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH FOR POOR WOMEN IN SOUTH ASIA CONTENTS ACRONYMSAND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. V Chapter 1. Reproductive Health in South Asia: Poor and Unequal... 1 WHY FOCUS ON REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INSOUTH ASIA? ........................ 2 HOW THIS
  • A Community-Based Intervention for Improving Medication Adherence for Elderly Patients with Hypertension in Korea

    A Community-Based Intervention for Improving Medication Adherence for Elderly Patients with Hypertension in Korea

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article A Community-Based Intervention for Improving Medication Adherence for Elderly Patients with Hypertension in Korea Kang-Ju Son 1 , Hyo-Rim Son 2 , Bohyeun Park 3 , Hee-Ja Kim 4 and Chun-Bae Kim 2,5,6,* 1 Research Institute for Healthcare Policy, Korean Medical Association, Seoul 04373, Korea; [email protected] 2 Hongcheon County Hypertension and Diabetes Registration and Education Center, Kangwon Province, Hongcheon 25135, Korea; [email protected] 3 Hongcheon County Health Center, Kangwon Province, Hongcheon 25135, Korea; [email protected] 4 Hoengseong County Health Center, Kangwon Province, Hoengseong 25220, Korea; [email protected] 5 Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Korea 6 Institute for Poverty Alleviation and International Development, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-(0)33-741-0344; Fax: +82-(0)33-747-0409 Received: 16 December 2018; Accepted: 21 February 2019; Published: 28 February 2019 Abstract: The chronic disease management program, a community-based intervention including patient education, recall and remind service, and reduction of out-of-pocket payment, was implemented in 2005 in Korea to improve patients’ adherence for antihypertensive medications. This study aimed to assess the effect of a community-based hypertension intervention intended to enhance patient adherence to prescribed medications. This study applied a non-equivalent control group design using the Korean National Health Insurance Big Data. Hongcheon County has been continuously implementing the intervention program since 2012. This study involved a cohort of patients with hypertension aged >65 and <85 years, among residents who lived in the study area for five years (between 2010 and 2014).
  • Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire

    Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire

    13 · Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire o. A. w. DILKE We have already emphasized that in the period of the A further stimulus to large-scale surveying and map­ early empire1 the Greek contribution to the theory and ping practice in the early empire was given by the land practice of small-scale mapping, culminating in the work reforms undertaken by the Flavians. In particular, a new of Ptolemy, largely overshadowed that of Rome. A dif­ outlook both on administration and on cartography ferent view must be taken of the history of large-scale came with the accession of Vespasian (T. Flavius Ves­ mapping. Here we can trace an analogous culmination pasianus, emperor A.D. 69-79). Born in the hilly country of the Roman bent for practical cartography. The foun­ north of Reate (Rieti), a man of varied and successful dations for a land surveying profession, as already noted, military experience, including the conquest of southern had been laid in the reign of Augustus. Its expansion Britain, he overcame his rivals in the fierce civil wars of had been occasioned by the vast program of colonization A.D. 69. The treasury had been depleted under Nero, carried out by the triumvirs and then by Augustus him­ and Vespasian was anxious to build up its assets. Fron­ self after the civil wars. Hyginus Gromaticus, author of tinus, who was a prominent senator throughout the Fla­ a surveying treatise in the Corpus Agrimensorum, tells vian period (A.D. 69-96), stresses the enrichment of the us that Augustus ordered that the coordinates of surveys treasury by selling to colonies lands known as subseciva.
  • Barking Riverside, London First Options Testing of Options: Sketch (Neighborhood Scale)

    Barking Riverside, London First Options Testing of Options: Sketch (Neighborhood Scale)

    CLIMATE-RESILIENT URBAN PLANS AND DESIGNS QUEZON CITY Tools for Design Development I - Urban Design as a Tool Planning Instruments •Philippine Development Plan / Regional Development Plan Comprehensive Plans, NEDA – National Economic and Development Authority •The Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) ~1:40 000 - 1: 20 000 strategic planning approach, specific proposals for guiding, regulating growth and development; considers all sectors significant in the development process consistent with and supportive of provincial plan provides guidelines for city/municipality, including •Zoning Ordinances (implementing tool of the CLUP) divides a territory into zones (residential, commercial, industrial, open space, etc) and specifies the nature and intensity of use of each zone. It is required to be updated every 5 years. •Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) Medium-term plan of action implementing the CLUP (3-6 years), covers the social, economic, infrastructure, environment and institutional sectors •Barangay Development Plan (BDP) socio-economic and physical plan of the barangay; includes priority programmes, projects and activities of the barangay development council enumerates specific programmes and projects and their costs; justifies the use of the Barangay’s share of the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) coming from the national government. Usually a list of projects. Urban Design “CityLife Masterplan” - Milano II - The Design Brief as Tool for Resilient Urban Design Instruments per Scale, New ZealandMetropolitan City-wide (urban area) Urban District PrivateNeighborhood Space Street Purpose of the Design Brief 1. The Task specifies what a project has to achieve, by what means, in what timeframe so the design team works towards the right direction (e.g. environmental targets, programme, demands for m²) 2.
  • New Challenges Facing Asian Agriculture Under Globalisation

    New Challenges Facing Asian Agriculture Under Globalisation

    New Challenges Facing --------1-------- Asian Agriculture under Globalisation Volume II Edited by Jamalludin Sulaiman Fatimah Mohamed Arshad Mad Nasir Shamsudin 34 Farm Household Debt Problems in Jeonnom Province, Korea: ACose Study J.K. Park, P.S. Park and K.H. Song Introduction Farm loans have increased quite rapidly in the recent decades and the farm household debt 1 matter has become a serious socio-economic issue in Korea. In an effort to get around this critical issue, the government would prepare and implement impromptu new debt measures. Yet, the farm-debt ratio over farm income has been increasing very rapidly since the beginning of the WTO in 1995 and the IMF financial crisis of 1997, leading to 88 per cent as that of 2000, mainly due to low agricultural income. During the period of 1994 (the year right before the beginning of the WTO)-2000, farm household income had increased by 13.6 per cent but debt had increased by as much as 156.3 per cent (MAF, 2001 ). That is, farm household debt has been increasing very rapidly since 1995. Yet, the ratio of non-farm income accounted for around 32 per cent of farm income in recent years, which made it more difficult for farmers to repay their loans. This problem is getting even more complicated because of joint surety among the farmers, which would lead to total bankruptcy of farms including financially sound farms. Recently, more than 7 5 per cent of farm loans were utilised for the purpose of agricultural production. In order to cope with labour shortage problems due to the rural-urban migration of labour force, farmers began to purchase more agricultural machinery, which eventually led to the galloping farm household debts.
  • Christian Communication and Its Impact on Korean Society : Past, Present and Future Soon Nim Lee University of Wollongong

    Christian Communication and Its Impact on Korean Society : Past, Present and Future Soon Nim Lee University of Wollongong

    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year Christian communication and its impact on Korean society : past, present and future Soon Nim Lee University of Wollongong Lee, Soon Nim, Christian communication and its impact on Korean society : past, present and future, Doctor of Philosphy thesis, School of Journalism and Creative Writing - Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong, 2009. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3051 This paper is posted at Research Online. Christian Communication and Its Impact on Korean Society: Past, Present and Future Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Wollongong Soon Nim Lee Faculty of Creative Arts School of Journalism & Creative writing October 2009 i CERTIFICATION I, Soon Nim, Lee, declare that this thesis, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of Creative Arts and Writings (School of Journalism), University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Soon Nim, Lee 18 March 2009. i Table of Contents Certification i Table of Contents ii List of Tables vii Abstract viii Acknowledgements x Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Christianity awakens the sleeping Hangeul 12 Introduction 12 2.1 What is the Hangeul? 12 2.2 Praise of Hangeul by Christian missionaries
  • Mayor Pam Hemminger and City Council Members From: Miriam Thompson and Rev

    Mayor Pam Hemminger and City Council Members From: Miriam Thompson and Rev

    April 8, 2016 To: Mayor Pam Hemminger and City Council members From: Miriam Thompson and Rev. J. Mark Davidson, Co-Conveners Abrahamic Initiative on the Middle East Cc: AIME Steering Committee members Dear Elected leaders, Early this week, we shared our deep concern with the decision of our Chapel Hill Mayor and Council to host 4 Israeli Knesset members, whose tour is sponsored by the U. S. State Department’s International Visitors’ Leadership Program, and coordinated in the Triangle by Raleigh based International Focus. We understand you have confirmed plans to host the delegation this coming Monday, April 11th, starting at 1pm, following which the members will visit the Botanical Gardens. We understand you plan to host the meeting in the Town Hall conference room, and open the Town Hall conversation to the public. However, the Mayor’s office has informed us that NO public comment will be solicited because the meeting is not a regularly scheduled business meeting. However, we can find no policy that precludes the Council from a more democratic process. We were invited to submit targeted questions and comments to our Town’s elected officials that they might consider posing to Knesset visitors to sharpen the conversation. We have cited some guiding commentary and questions below that we hope are helpful. But because of the concerns we will enumerate below, we continue to press the Council to reconsider its decision AND allow public comment at a public meeting, Our deep concerns over the Mayor and Council’s decision to host the Knesset member
  • Mr. Jeffery T. Folden, PE, DBIA Subject

    Mr. Jeffery T. Folden, PE, DBIA Subject

    69 Baekjegobun-ro, Songpa-gu Seoul, Republic of Korea, 05556 Tel: +82 2 3400 3513 / Fax: +82 2 3400 3519 E-mail: [email protected] Hompage: http://www.samoocm.com 20th December 2017 To: Chief, Innovative Contracting MDOT State Highway Administration ATTN: Mr. Jeffery T. Folden, P.E., DBIA Subject: Official Submission of response to RFI Dear Mr. Jeffery T. Folden, On behalf of my company and our Korea consortium (SAMOOCM, HWASHIN ENGINEERING, and SAMBO ENGINEERING), we would like to express strong interest in participating in the I-495, I-95 (Capital Beltway) and I-270 Congestion Relief Improvement Project. Also, we have met with Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA)’s Maryland office on December 19, 2017 to form strong partnership to participate in this project together. We have enclosed our response to the RFI below for official submission. Please do not hesistate to contact us if you need more information regarding the RFI. Thank you Yours sincerely, Hur, In CEO and President SAMOOCM Architects & Engineers Co., Ltd. Response to Maryland DOT’s RFI I-495/I-95 (Capital Beltway) Congestion Relief Improvements from the American Legion Bridge to the Woodrow Wilson Bridge I-270 Congestion Relief Improvements From I-495 to I-70 December 20, 2017 Korea Consortium 1. RFI’s Intent ▪ Provide the basic information about this project, and when this project is promoted as a private investment, we will collect opinions of experts such as individuals, companies, and organizations, etc. to evaluate the appropriateness of pushing forward private investment project. ▪ Reviewing specific and innovative initiatives throughout the project by gathering of opinions from experts and collecting ideas 2.
  • Development of Streamflow Drought Severity–Duration–Frequency Curves

    Development of Streamflow Drought Severity–Duration–Frequency Curves

    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3341–3351, 2014 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/3341/2014/ doi:10.5194/hess-18-3341-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Development of streamflow drought severity–duration–frequency curves using the threshold level method J. H. Sung1 and E.-S. Chung2 1Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Yeongsan River Flood Control Office, Gwangju, Republic of Korea 2Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul, 139-743, Republic of Korea Correspondence to: E.-S. Chung ([email protected]) Received: 5 October 2013 – Published in Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 3 December 2013 Revised: 16 July 2014 – Accepted: 22 July 2014 – Published: 3 September 2014 Abstract. This study developed a streamflow drought also derived to quantify the extent of the drought duration. severity–duration–frequency (SDF) curve that is analogous These curves can be an effective tool to identify streamflow to the well-known depth–duration–frequency (DDF) curve droughts using severities, durations, and frequencies. used for rainfall. Severity was defined as the total water deficit volume to target threshold for a given drought dura- tion. Furthermore, this study compared the SDF curves of four threshold level methods: fixed, monthly, daily, and de- 1 Introduction sired yield for water use. The fixed threshold level in this study is the 70th percentile value (Q70) of the flow dura- The rainfall deficiencies of sufficient magnitude over pro- tion curve (FDC), which is compiled using all available daily longed durations and extended areas and the subsequent re- streamflows. The monthly threshold level is the monthly ductions in the streamflow interfere with the normal agricul- varying Q70 values of the monthly FDC.