Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society Architecture and Evolution Author(s): Robert Mark Reviewed work(s): Source: American Scientist, Vol. 84, No. 4 (JULY-AUGUST 1996), pp. 383-389 Published by: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29775710 . Accessed: 01/05/2012 16:19 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Scientist. http://www.jstor.org Architecture and Evolution In over thedebate adaptation,which view is best served by themetaphors of the "spandrels" of SanMarco and thebosses ofKing's College? Robert Mark their criticism of the evo? dral de San in support (Basilica Marco) Venice, primary documents and from archaeo? of has come to To lutionary precept adaptationism, pervade evolutionary dis? logical examination, have greatly en? Gould and course. For in texton biologists Stephen Jay example, his 1992 hanced our understanding of architec? Richard Lewontin in 1979 devised an evolution Williams George categorical? tural innovation. They have also helped rooted in historical architec? states "New structures arise in analogy ly evolu? iUuminate themethods used by presci ture.